The philosophy of psychedelic experience w/ Aidan Lyon - Voices with Vervaeke

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @alexandrazachary.musician
    @alexandrazachary.musician 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I second the motion that we buy John a decent mic. I don’t want to miss a word! 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

    • @dsuleyma
      @dsuleyma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Came here to say this.

    • @amirj259
      @amirj259 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now I remember John actually used a mic in "awakening ..." series. I dont know what happened to it.

  • @davidw8668
    @davidw8668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Shall we do some crowdfunding to get John a proper mic?

  • @MrGroovequest
    @MrGroovequest 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching these videos is a psychedelic experience!
    My mind is revealed in all it's mundanity and profundity.
    Thanks!

  • @JustinTimeAnderson
    @JustinTimeAnderson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    John, keep it up! You got put on a LOT of people's radar recently - there's no better time to drop consistent, current videos. Grateful to have been exposed to you.

  • @sebastiangaete2639
    @sebastiangaete2639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant. More confirmation of and convergence with my own experiences and reflections on psychedelics and meditation, especially around insight, flow and movement (which I've also written about). Can't wait to read your book Aidan!

  • @justinbirkholz
    @justinbirkholz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great conversation! Thank you, John, for bringing Aidan on and introducing us to such an interesting thinker. I can't wait to read his book.

  • @shamanverse
    @shamanverse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent. Wise. Fresh. Thank you both for this dialogue.

  • @joshbowe-artwork5489
    @joshbowe-artwork5489 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Transformations are not representations - You've just given me a whole new art project to work on John, thank you. Fascinating conversation, thank you both

    • @johnvervaeke
      @johnvervaeke  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good to hear from you Josh!

  • @matfar100
    @matfar100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoyed this conversation it was wonderful to see the convergence of ideas. Thanks so much for doing this publicly so that we viewers could learn from you both.

  • @leedufour
    @leedufour 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Aidan and John!

  • @richardsantomauro6947
    @richardsantomauro6947 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is awesome!!! Can’t wait for the book!

  • @alodera
    @alodera 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pity I can mark this video with like only once 👍👍👍

  • @arono9304
    @arono9304 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It’s not just the mic, the audio levels on both ends also don’t match up; Aidan is way louder and with a dialogos like this we can’t turn up and off the volume all the time ;)
    A better mic would also be a great addition!

  • @EnemyOfEldar
    @EnemyOfEldar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you John and Aiden 🙏. Amazing convergence and discussion of that convergence. What you two get onto in the last 15mins was golden and such a natural crescendo, I felt. And I was thinking "I bet Zevi is here loving this" and boom, then you mentioned it! Cannot wait for that to happen.
    Thank you so much!
    [I wrote a big explication of my crazy maths based metaphysical view that reality has to be like this because numbers (maths) are real. I obviously know now from John's work that that's a kind of Platonism. But it was just indulgence. Even this bracketed section is an indulgence. My apologies 🤲. 'spose I'm hopin' someone just has fun with this and pokes me on it]
    It was endearing to see what I perceived to be you two academics skirting around calling it the big boy metaphysics it was. Far too big for my feet at least. Giant stuff :) thank you, again 🙏.

  • @MattFRox
    @MattFRox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes,yes,yes talk with Zebi (sp?) on Seekers of Unity. Yes , please

  • @alxsmac733
    @alxsmac733 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Phenomenological touchstone" is a fantastic term

  • @forecast_hinderer
    @forecast_hinderer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m definitely biased here, but I think many cyclists experience cycling as a meditative movement practice. Interesting too, in Grand Tour professional cycling, a sprinter when interviewed after c.200km stage with sprint finish, will often be able to recite every little move than happened in the last 10 seconds with precise accuracy.

    • @KalebPeters99
      @KalebPeters99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think this is a great point, and in my estimation should apply to most high-level athletic practices even beyond cycling! Humans are always tryna access transcendance somehow ✨

  • @tleevz1
    @tleevz1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is exciting. Thank you fellas.

  • @ziggyzigfried7398
    @ziggyzigfried7398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "...the bullshit cycle..." I like it. Is the remedy based on the phrase "cut through the crap"?

  • @ptadisbander7959
    @ptadisbander7959 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    God this line of thought is just so much more interesting and I think consequential than psychedelics help
    With x mental
    Health condition. It’s actually getting to why they help and it has massive implications for
    Culture.

  • @alexandrazachary.musician
    @alexandrazachary.musician 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’d like to hear how this can be mapped onto the indigenous ontology of people who traditionally use psychedelics. I think the salience landscape is somewhat different. And it has become very confusing for westerners seeking understanding within indigenous contexts where they don’t share the meaning making machinery. 🙏🏽❤️

  • @MikeTownsend
    @MikeTownsend 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    John when is your birthday? We gotta get you a mic as a present.

  • @mediocrates3416
    @mediocrates3416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:31:15 The transfer function becomes the driving function. Look; i'm sorry i took Control Systems, ok? Y'all say "jolt" or "shock" a system; you mean, present a delta or gamma function. Presumably, transformation is a step fumction. Sorry, geez.

  • @gidi1899
    @gidi1899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    psychedelic experience
    what about calling it: "the cloud connecting experience"
    because it feels like:
    2 or more clouds of understanding (the brain is a net, right?) connect.
    and all the "commons" between the clouds emerge.

  • @jgarciajr82
    @jgarciajr82 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zevi and Aidan 🙏

  • @mediocrates3416
    @mediocrates3416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Self is an ontological fact; it is a living body, a soul. Ego evolved because we are gregarious animals and we need to know our place; it's likely there is a space for ego like there is for language. Personal identity is an illusion: it's not a delusion, it's an illusion that comes from the memory set addressed by the driving function. Change the driving function and you have a different memory set.

  • @mediocrates3416
    @mediocrates3416 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extracellular electrotonic wave dynamics. Grey matter neural branchlets are viscerally connected to the extracellular electrotonic environment. Is that ineffable? Pretty ineffable.

  • @raivis2973
    @raivis2973 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Improve the quality of your mic and this content will become legendary.

  • @HolyWisdom93
    @HolyWisdom93 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We enter into the Entirety and the material dimension as into a womb, actualizing the divine potential of the Living Father through the Divine Mother - conceived and growing in her until our gestation is complete and we are born to the Pleroma of Light, reborn of the Mother Spirit into union with God and Godhead.

  • @jamespercy8506
    @jamespercy8506 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    not so much incompressible as recursively generative? Just a thought.

  • @amirj259
    @amirj259 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    John please buy a mic. There are even these nice headphones on Amazon that have microphones built into them

  • @beluga2841
    @beluga2841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    John please please please new Microphone. It's very screechy and uncomfortable to listen to. Amazing conversation btw.

  • @futurecultureproject9692
    @futurecultureproject9692 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    somehow he sounds like he copied a lot from John

  • @renegadegardener
    @renegadegardener 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What bothers me about these conversations is that there is a whole religious tradition that operates exclusively in the spaces that these two are talking about. A tradition that has worked out a lot of the questions being brought up here, but it is primarily Spanish speaking so it is under or unrepresented in these conversations. I would love for john to speak to an actual practitioner of a shamanic tradition as opposed to a European or North American

    • @MattFRox
      @MattFRox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      With all due respect, I’ve talked to many English-speaking shamans, and I’d lay money these two gentlemen have spoken to a few also. So please just throw out a few names or perhaps traditions that we can investigate. There is no reason to make implicit political accusations. ?Verdad?

    • @pedrogorilla483
      @pedrogorilla483 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's that called?

    • @renegadegardener
      @renegadegardener 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No political accusation intended. Just an overly brief comment during my lunch break at work. I'm legitimately interested in seeing conversation happen between thinkers like Vervaeke and spiritual leaders like those who I sit with in Colombia and Mexico. I worry that the western psychedelic movement is trying to reinvent the wheel around how to use these medicines safely and in a way that achieves the utmost leverage for personal growth and development. I listen to podcasts like these and hear questions being asked that my teachers in the south have 1000+ year old traditional answers to. I would love to see john speak with a inga elder or Mexican Maricami about the ritual use of psychedelics, the same way he has spoken to Zevi Slavin about Jewish Mysticism, or Johnathan Pageau about Christian symbolism. Look my critique is purely out of love of John's work, as well as recognition of its critical importance. In fact I would say that it is as important as the work my ceremonial family does to preserve the indigenous teachings of both north and south America. That's why I want to see that conversation happen.

    • @richardsantomauro6947
      @richardsantomauro6947 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@renegadegardener How can you say there is no political accusation intended? Your comment says “what bothers you about these conversations” is that there are traditions that are “unrepresented”. If your aim was to sincerely ask Dr. Vervaeke allocate some of the time he has been generously giving toward speaking with someone from this tradition, why not ask him politely, instead of bending over backwards to make it an issue of cultural insensitivity, when it’s not?
      1. The topic is philosophy, not “a survey of psychedelic drug use in cultures around the world”. They are talking about book. Exactly what kind if “representation” is lacking on that topic that you are so disturbed not to see?
      2. De. Vervaeke is the most culturally respectful public intellectual in the world. He has demonstrated openness and sensitivity to all cultures.
      3. The “representation” you are demanding doesn’t even make sense. As an expert in cross cultural indigeounous Shamanism, you must be aware that the term is overloaded and it would be difficult to even count the traditions and ways in which they vary. They are not even remotely homogeneous. To “represent” them all would require a whole separate TH-cam channel. Will you still be so “bothered” if the only one that gets reoresented is the one to which you belong?
      4. Dr. Vervaeke did not hunt down the participants you mentioned above. They have been generous anough to volunteer their time in the same way that he is. If you really have access to an authentic indigeounous Shaman who would be interested in these cognitive science related tooics and willing to share in these conversations PLEASE make the introductions. At the very least, add his contact her, and links to ANY genuine authentic material in ANY format would be amazing.

    • @shamanverse
      @shamanverse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How one likes their infinity served is a matter of taste, really. Being a Quetzalero from Costa Rica I savor the intercivilzational dialogue, hybridity, and novelty that passes through Snake Island. There is a delicious intersectionality happening between North and South America that forwards superlative well being.:)