Theology Uncorked - You believe what about Mary?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @vonitaesse4307
    @vonitaesse4307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video, albeit poorly made, contains real gems! A real treasure!! I would sell all I have just to be given this treasure, which is Truth! Thank you so much Allison! God bless you!

  • @adao2025
    @adao2025 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am Vietnamese, so I don't have a problem understanding the part about brothers and sisters; we all call each other brothers and sisters. Thanks, Allison, for all your lessons. I learned a lot from you.

  • @ni200v
    @ni200v 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a really excellent presentation! Thank you so much for providing all the examples from scripture that can be used to demonstrate the logic of the Church's position and venerable tradition regarding the Marian dogmas!

  • @peaveawwii1
    @peaveawwii1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    THIS TEACHER IS EXCELLENT. PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO LISTEN TO THIS/ GREAT STUFF

  • @bahreh.7807
    @bahreh.7807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant mind. This presentation is really helpful .

  • @faithofourfathers
    @faithofourfathers 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job on this presentation! Love it! One thing to mention. At 1:07:32 in the video… Actually St. Paul tells us very specifically … “and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.” 1 Tim 2:14

  • @annapennrose1158
    @annapennrose1158 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That was an awesome presentation, Allison.

  • @uncatila
    @uncatila ปีที่แล้ว

    lets get started already

  • @aure818v
    @aure818v 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    really great lecture.
    the out of focus throughout the video is annoying.

  • @juliorivera870
    @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mary's sons did not believe that Jesus was the son of God, Jesus was the only begotten of the Father, but not the only begotten of Mary, psalm 69: 8-9 tells you this.unless the Catholic Church have taken it out of the Catholic Bible.

  • @juliorivera870
    @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand? Mary is not the mother of God the Father, and not the mother of God the holyspirit? But she is the mother of God the son! Because Jesus did not exist before her? Jesus said: I was set up from everlasting, proverbs 8:23 to 30

    • @viktorzaritskyi4722
      @viktorzaritskyi4722 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Do you believe that Marry is mother of Jesus?Is Jesus 100% God and 100% man? Was he God when Marry had him in her womb or when she delivered him? If you agree ,that Marry is mother of Jesus,who is God(and always was) so she is mother of God

  • @juliorivera870
    @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Paul only saw James the Lord's brother, Gal 1:19

  • @juliorivera870
    @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Catholic Church teach another Gospel, the gospel of Mary, even if an angel give you another gospel, let him be a curse, Christ was born without sin ,die a virgin, didn't have sons or daughters, & resurrected, this is the gospel of Jesus Christ.

    • @rubentayco1316
      @rubentayco1316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no Gospel of Mary. It is not good to lie about Mary.

    • @juliorivera870
      @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rubentayco1316 your correct, that what the Catholic Church do, they make Mary the queen of heaven as a goddess. They lie

    • @rubentayco1316
      @rubentayco1316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      julio rivera if the Son is King of Heaven, doesn’t it mean His Mother is Queen?

    • @juliorivera870
      @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rubentayco1316 who told you that lie, Jesus is God, Mary is a mortal.

    • @ammarageorge2254
      @ammarageorge2254 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't believe you finished this full video, with justification and early church reference she is giving and still using may and may not be, in the end she concluded that she can't believe that if Mary was chosen for being Mother of GOD the Son would be sinful. She could have refuse like Jonnah and remained in fish for three day to be obedient. Why does not it clear up your mind woman. After 1500 years some realize oh catholic Christian was wrong and after another 1500 years somebody again stand and say oh Protestant Christian was teaching wrong. I mean is it joke that Jesus himself said I am with you from the beginning till the end this world. Now who can prove me you doctrine beginning. I can't trust any one else than catholic Christian because they were with Christ and Christ with them from beginning.

  • @tatianaG
    @tatianaG 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "The number 1 reason I believe this is because the church teaches it, and I trust the church."

    • @juliorivera870
      @juliorivera870 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't believe it if is catholisim DOGMA

    • @EliteTrainingForBasketball
      @EliteTrainingForBasketball 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what Christian tradition do you follow?

    • @beag.b4894
      @beag.b4894 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus is the Cornerstone of His Church.

  • @beag.b4894
    @beag.b4894 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY PRTOTESTANTS DO NOT RESPECT MARY, IT JUST DOES NOT MAKE SENSE, IF YOU LOVE JESUS, YOU SHOULD ALSO RESPECT HIS MOTHER!

    • @bowlineastronomenov5507
      @bowlineastronomenov5507 ปีที่แล้ว

      We respected Her! We just do not treat her like a god just like how you catholics treat her without noticing.

    • @user-tr9ee8bk7d
      @user-tr9ee8bk7d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bowlineastronomenov5507no you do not respect Her in fact you hate Her. You don't even call Her Mama Mary or Blessed Mother or Our Lady you just call Her plainly Mary!

  • @alhilford2345
    @alhilford2345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    20:00
    34:07
    1:03:52
    1:17:00
    29:00
    48:00
    1:25

  • @parrisroy
    @parrisroy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Martin Luther was a Roman Catholic Monk and continued in many of Rome's false doctrines and dogmas.
    He didn't see the depths of Rome's Spiritual depravity and deception straight away.
    Even though he "cottoned on" more as time passed, he still never managed to see Rome for all of her true idolatrous ways and vile blasphemies.
    Today we are far more advanced in knowledge and understanding.

  • @lauraritonya
    @lauraritonya 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    oh my gosh, the church doesn't say. Seriously??? Why not look at what the word of God says?????????

    • @RumorHazi
      @RumorHazi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Haleyjo What did the "Word of God" say between the lives of Christ and the Apostles and the 4th century? You do know that the Church predates the New Testament right? Who do you think put the Bible together?

    • @lauraritonya
      @lauraritonya 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then why aren't their teachings in the bible? I'll tell you why, because it isn't the word of God. It's man-made doctrine.

    • @RumorHazi
      @RumorHazi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Haleyjo It's not "doctrine". There are no new revelations. The Church Fathers were the disciples of the Apostles. The ones like Ignatius of Antioch, Clemente of Rome, Irenaeus of Lyon, Polycarp, etc. The Church doesn't claim their writings were inspired like Divine Scripture. Many of them were taught directly by the Apostles.

    • @RumorHazi
      @RumorHazi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Google the Council of Rome. That's be a good start. That's where the Church had the first Council to decide what books would make up the Bible.

  • @parrisroy
    @parrisroy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Keys
    Janus was worshipped in Rome as the god of doors and hinges, and was called "the opener and shutter." Hislop explains what appears at first sight to be a rather strange belief about Janus. "This had a blasphemous meaning, for he was worshipped at Rome as the grand mediator. Whatever important business was in hand, whatever deity was to be invoked, an invocation first of all must be addressed to Janus, who was recognised as the "God of gods," in whose mysterious divinity the characters of father and son were combined, and without that no prayer could be heard - the "door of heaven" could not be opened." [5, page 210] Therefore, Janus was represented with a head with two faces, one old and one young, and holding a key in his hand [7, page 75]. In like fashion the goddess Cybele also carried a key [5, page 207].
    Hislop [5, page 210] points out, that the worship of Janus prevailed in Asia Minor at the same time as the Lord commanded the apostle John to write to the seven churches. Thus we read in the book of Revelation, "And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth." (Revelation 3. 7) Here the Lord confirms that he is the one true God, who alone opens and shuts the door of heaven.
    As the great head of the Mysteries in Rome, the Sovereign Pontiff or "Pontifex Maximus" held the key of Janus and the key of Cybele, which were tokens of his position as their earthly representative. The keys became the symbols of the authority of the Pontifex Maximus [5, page 207] [7, page 74]. He was known by the Latin title "Pater Patrum," which means in English "Father of Fathers" [7, page 75]. He was also addressed by the title "Your Holiness" [5, page 212].
    The Interpreter of the Mysteries
    The Pontifex Maximus had one more title that we must consider here. This is a mysterious one, variations of which were used by heads of the Mysteries in other parts of the ancient world. The priest or Pontiff who explained the Mysteries to the initiated was known as the "Interpreter," which is in Chaldee (the real language of the Mysteries) "Peter" [5, page 208]. Hislop explains about Peter the Interpreter as follows: "As the revealer of that which was hidden, nothing was more natural than that, while opening up the esoteric [i.e. intended only for the initiated] doctrine of the Mysteries, he should be decorated with the keys of the two divinities whose mysteries he unfolded. Thus we may see how the keys of Janus and Cybele would come to be known as the keys of Peter, the "interpreter" of the Mysteries." [5, page 208]
    The Pontifex Maximus had one more title that we must consider here. This is a mysterious one, variations of which were used by heads of the Mysteries in other parts of the ancient world. The priest or Pontiff who explained the Mysteries to the initiated was known as the "Interpreter," which is in Chaldee (the real language of the Mysteries) "Peter" [5, page 208]. Hislop explains about Peter the Interpreter as follows: "As the revealer of that which was hidden, nothing was more natural than that, while opening up the esoteric [i.e. intended only for the initiated] doctrine of the Mysteries, he should be decorated with the keys of the two divinities whose mysteries he unfolded. Thus we may see how the keys of Janus and Cybele would come to be known as the keys of Peter, the "interpreter" of the Mysteries." [5, page 208]
    The god of the Mysteries was also known by the title "Peter-Roma," which is Chaldee for the "Grand Interpreter" [5, page 209]. In the next chapter we will see how "Peter-Roma" the Grand Interpreter of the Mysteries, was transformed by the papacy into the Apostle "Peter of Rome." Behold, the mystery of iniquity !
    Martin Luther made a very perceptive statement when he wrote, "I know that the papacy is none other than the kingdom of Babylon, and the violence of Nimrod the mighty hunter. ... The papacy is a vigorous chase led by the Roman bishop, to catch and destroy souls." (quoted by D'Aubigné, [12, page 197])
    Ancient Pagan Romish religion or Modern day Roman Catholicism? Do you see a difference?

    • @row1landr
      @row1landr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Garbage, minion of Satan, be gone! Your lies to try to destroy Jesus and His Church are insane!

    • @row1landr
      @row1landr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one believes your lies

  • @parrisroy
    @parrisroy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funny.. she said, (when referencing the Marian Dogmas,)
    "why do I believe this?" Number 1. "Because the church teaches it and I trust the church!"
    Well we Christians don't believe it because, number 1. The Holy Bible, (God's Word,) doesn't say it, and we trust God's Word for all we need to know of His will and His ways. 😇

    • @EliteTrainingForBasketball
      @EliteTrainingForBasketball 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean the Bible that the Catholic church compiled and assembled the canon of at the Council of Rome in 382?

    • @user-tr9ee8bk7d
      @user-tr9ee8bk7d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then why do you read the Bible? Why do you believe the Bible is the word of God. Why do you believe there are only 4 Gospels in the Bible? Who said so or who taught you? It is the Catholic Church who compiled the Bible. What if the Catholic Church put in the Bible words that should not be there? What if the Catholic Church was wrong in translating the Bible? Why do you believe it as Gospel truth? First and foremost if you question the Catholic Church's dogma you should first question the Bible because the Catolic Church made it and part of the Church's dogma.

  • @tassiespirit
    @tassiespirit 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mary is a sinner like all of us humans the Bible teaches that we have all fallen short of the Glory of God. 2. She did not remain a virgin as she had Jesus as a human baby and then other sons( James), 3.Mary is the mother of Jesus not God the Son - Jesus was human and the scriptures say He was born human not a God on Earth4. We all are taken to Heaven if we are Christians and forgiven. 5. Mary needed Jesus to save her sin Mary has original sin in her like you and me; like Abraham etc. When Dogma is not in the Scriptures then it is Heresy

    • @vonitaesse4307
      @vonitaesse4307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Some Truths are not given to all to understand. It’s obvious that you did not take the take to understand anything. You might have not even taken the time to hear what the presenter had to say. Rejecting Truth is an action you have taken and will have to suffer the consequences for.

    • @thatcatholicgirlhelena
      @thatcatholicgirlhelena 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me ask you this question, to which you should try to answer HONESTLY; So now, would you look at God and think he can't be THOROUGH ENOUGH to PRESERVE the VESSEL via which his SON would come into this world? Have you ever thought about this; You say "Mary was a sinner just like the rest of us." But I ask you, won't that mean that "Jesus would also be born a sinner?" Think about this. And give me a honest reply.

    • @row1landr
      @row1landr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow! You are so wrong!!! You do not know the Bible and you do not know true context of what you read.
      You are a troll and a minion for Satan! No one here believes your lies!

    • @AnabellaWherrett
      @AnabellaWherrett 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Angel Gabriel addressed Mary “Hail, full of grace “!
      The angel was just a messenger from the Holy Trinity and instructed him yo say those words.
      Hail!!is only use yo address kings, the fact that the angel used it to Mary means she is someone important in the eyes of God because God made her. She’s the Queen in Rev.12.1
      She’s “full of grace” so she’s perfected by God to carry God the Son in her womb.
      God doesn’t dwell in a defiled vessel (body). So it makes sense that God preserved her from all sins, that’s why the angel addressed her “Hail, full of grace”. The angel didn’t even dare to utter her name out of utmost respect because the angel knew who the blessed Mother really is-- the perfected vessel for the Son of God to come through her on earth.

    • @AnabellaWherrett
      @AnabellaWherrett 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jesus was born with 2 natures: God and human! How are you going to separate Jesus’s God nature when he entered into Mary’s womb He didn’t leave His Godhood in heaven. His divinity came into human flesh. So when He was born, he is both God and human ! It’s not impossible because nothing is impossible to God. Our minds are limited to understand the things of God. We need the Holy Spirit’s help.