is Modern Warfare 3 just MW2 DLC?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2023
- These are my first impressions of the MW3 Beta... ENJOY! :D
➤Twitter: / tbaggamingyt
➤Discord: / discord or / discord
➤Instagram: / tbaggaming
➤Twitch: / tbaggamingyt
➤Business Enquiries: tbaggaming.business@gmail.com
#TBAG #MW3 #ModernWarfare3 - เกม
thought on Modern Warfare 3?
Cringe
Different name, same fodder
It's bad
Another money pit
Gameplay looks ass
1:10 cod players in a nutshell:
Gets killed too fast-
Player:"Increase a time to kill"
Developers:"Ok, we increased TTK"
Player after having to shoot enemy for a longer time:
"WHY IS HE NOT DYING?"
Except I die faster than everyone in every cod after 2019
Seriously go to 7:17 and watch in 0.25. Count the headhshots, trusting you can count lol
Its that battle rage thing that's kind of overpowered right now, other than that the ttk is pretty good
@@Yea___i call that skill issue.
@@Yea___only thing i see is him having to shoot the enemy for longer time than in mw2. And you know why? Because now hp increased to 150 which made ttk higher. I know that cod players want it that way, that only their own hp was increased while their enemies' hp was decreased, but i wanna tell them, that there's a terrible thing which is called "balanced experience" which puts players in equal conditions, for everyone to enjoy a game
This doesn't even deserve the title of DLC, it's just a full price patch
Might as well rename it to MW2.1
Nah, this is a $70 expansion pack.
Same could be said about mw2 2009 and mw3 2011. Go cry about it
@@procrastinatesit’s not worth it 😂
@@electro5175their all dlc only children are. Dumb enough to buy it it’s Fortnite at this point 😂
The reason that they changed all of the names for the guns is because California made a law that no new games can be sold that promote real-life firearms, which is just another dumb af California law.
That really make perfect sense now. Stupid law from California.
wait are you for real? thats the actual reason?? just because of 1 state in the US, the rest of the world has to see this lame ass change ?
california is their biggest market because of the 17 million pride flags they put in lmao
@@TBAGless money for licensing fees too they won't argue
@@TBAGCalifornia sucks. Gas prices, their general atmosphere, and it’s overrated. We gotta let them have at least something ig
Can’t wait to buy a dlc that’s full price 💀
😂😂😂
people will gobble it up sadly
@@HumzablowbrainMK2and defend Activision on their bullshit
@@stacked4637 oh absolutely that’s going to happen
yeah of course they will so will i. why? because the damn memories for these Maps Activision knows how to bait us.@@HumzablowbrainMK2
$70 for a campaign and some minor improvements/additions to multiplayer is inexcusable. I said for 10 years straight I would never buy the next cod but I’ve only kept that promise since Cold War came out, and I’m keeping it this year too
Nor will I. I got bamboozled with the surprisingly good quality of mw2019 so I mindlessly bought mw2022 expecting a good game but as we all know it was far from it.
@@stacked4637mw2019 quality is unmatched,just look at rust,mw3 version looks like a cheap copy version of mw19 rust...
what additions? every single cod is the exact same
@@TerribleGamesTV2 you definitely go with the majority just to not feel excluded lmao
@@stacked4637MW2019 was the last COD game I bothered buying after seeing how pathetic the last COD games were post BO2. MW2 was an absolute waste and I thankfully refunded it once I saw how inferior it was to MW'19
I do remember -Activision saying- Jason Schreier rumoring MW2 was a 2-year game, and something about OG MW2 maps. Then Activision changed their tune and went back to yearly CoDs.
So yes, MW3 is $70 DLC for MW2
Activision never said that, that was reports from insiders and spread around by the community. Since Activision never said it, everyone who believed Activision wouldn't release a full-price game this year were being delusional. Otherwise they would have used that as a marketing push to get more people to buy MW2022.
@@matthewk4912but mw3 was a dlc no? So they must have had a two year plan
@@nikolajjensen4453No.
@@nikolajjensen4453 That was the initial plan but they scrapped it because Activision wanted another premium release.
They never confirmed that MW2 would have a two-year plan though. This is Activision we're talking about, we know what they're like. But people bought into the hype and bought MW2 because they believed they would stick to the 2-year plan. Even though Activision said nothing about it themselves.
They never confirmed that it would be a 2 year, it was talked about but they decided not to and never even talked about the idea publicly. Still pretty obvious that a large portion of mw3 was supposed to be updates and dlc to mw2 though
Looks like a mix between vanguard and mw
The funny thing is from all the gameplay seen, two the optics are ripped straight from Vanguard, even the optic that tbag has at the very beginning of the video is the slate reflector from Vanguard
@@sandvich3943 yes, I saw it too
Guns and audio feel so cheap. It's disgusting
@@strelitzia669and half the guns are ported from mw2 2022
It honestly plays really good so far imo
So you basically pay full price for them listening to the MW2’s beta feedback, but a year later
I've been thinking that perks in games should affect your appearance, like giving your character a mobility perk should change their boots or give them an EOD vest with a perk that reduces explosive damage
That would be awful because that's just another way to monetize the game. It's already up to its eyes in microtransactions. Microtransaction that get all the attention when it comes to creativity and care, things that should rightly already be included in the overpriced price tag. SBMM is also effected by microtransaction which is a hard fact and that shit is straight up unethical. But should we be surprised that a multi billion dollar game company is greedy as fuck and will do anything to keep on milking the emaciated cash cow that is the wet chin fanbase of this franchise?
Basically what BO1 did. Ghost gave Ghillie Suits, Flack Jacket gave EOD vests, Lightweight was a minimal armored operator. Scavenger had a lot of pouches. Hardline was just a normal looking soldier.
That wouldn't work in a game that has an insane amount of micro transactions.
@@_tokii__Hence why those shouldn't be in the game . .
@@DazHotep6EQUJ5
I don't think they'd be able to monetize perks.
I get guns and weapon BPs, but perks are more in line with killstreaks. Also given how operators are still here, most of the monetization will likely still be from cosmetics and weapon bps
@@retro_groovin I didn't mean monetize the perks themselves I meant monetize the cosmetics that are linked the perks the OP mentioned. Like boots, gloves, vests and so on. If Activision could get away with monetizing the actual perks they absolutely would.
Gotta love the first red dot sight being ripped straight from vanguard 💀💀💀
It was in the original mw too
Finally a TH-camr that doesn’t jump on the MW3 hype train and speaks the truth
Fr
What truth🤡 just be honest your skill level fell off and you can’t compete anymore it’s okay grandpa
Let people enjoy it if that is what makes then happy. If you don’t like it don’t buy it. Why does everyone feel the need to shit on others constantly? It’s cringe
@@LeSkinnerYour relentless defense of mediocrity and liquid shit being spoon fed to you is what's cringe.
@@2hotflavored666 1. I'm not interested in getting the game 2. The same thing was said about mw2 and mw3 back in 2009-2011, people calling it cod4 dlc, yet a decade later people don't stop yapping about how perfect they were 3. Not every game needs to be a masterpiece, good middle of the road games also can exist, not everything it's dogshit 4. let people enjoy whatever the fuck they want. Believe me, between someone like you and someone that's hyped to play the game, you're the one losing, the other person will actually enjoy it if it's up their alley. Keep stewing in anger about what other people do with their money bud
Can you play bf1 on the 20th or 22nd?
If you want a big scope gun that you can use for close range, put a hybrid sight on it.
The point is that we doesn't need to do that now
@@cokeweasel1064 yeah, just tilt it aside and you can use it like that
The more things change the more they stay the same, back when the OG MW3 came out people said that it was MW2.5, fast forward to 2023 now people are saying the same thing, history repeats itself
Also og MW3 multiplayer and spec ops/survival was made by sledgehammer games.
It can be agreed upon that even now the OG MW3 is just MW2.5 and inferior to the OG MW2.
There is meant to be a bf1 anniversary tournament on the 20th of October come along and play!
Gotta love, that all the voicelines are exactly the same as in MW22.
It’s still a beta so probably just a place holder
I agree the grapichs dosent look that special but i think it might look better if you lower the brightness and increase the saturation of the colors a bit
The only man to trust for honest CoD reviews
It was supposed to be a game priced (roughly £60) DLC for the year 2 of MW2 but Activision decided to turn it into a whole new rushed game for money. My theory is it was never meant to be DLC but they said it would be and that MW2 would have a 2 year game cycle so the sales of MW2 would increase then they announced that it was no longer DLC but I don't think they ever were going to make it a DLC.
Activision is doing the impossible which is selling what could have been a QoL update for MW2 as a fully fledged $70 game.
thank you for your great videos love them so much
It shouldn't cost £70 if its dlc we should pay £30 your playing MW2 reskin
Nah it should be free. As a game designer you could probably add most of MWiii into MWii and it won’t really break anything. Nobody should buy this game and if someone does they are brain dead
@@SlippiMeSkipper literally I have MW2 but I ain't paying another £70 for MW3
I like how both mw3s were just mw2 reskins
@@aidanwhite2894 OG MW3 is 10X better then the new one
Man, suddenly i just realize i am craving for a tbag rage compilation
Yes, yes it is
And I’m still waiting on bfv end of round themes worst to best
Your alive your a fan of bithb
Both
"And I'm still waiting on bfv end of round themes worst to best" entitled much? I didn't know he worked for you?
Bfv is still grea
@@jaygatsby5013 i also think it's "grea"
Didnt even mention, the fact that the ENTIRE game base design is MW2 - warzone animations , voice overs , create a class, the lobby layout, everything, waited a whole year for this? and to slap a $70 price tag on it blows my mind.
Tbag raging never gets old love the new video cant say the same to the game
Lets bring back BF1 October 20th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LET'S ALL GET BACK PLAYING BF1 OCTOBER 21ST
Shit game
I played the 2019 MW....The only diffrence between the games is the XP number font when you get a kill or assist. If that would not be the case, I would think this is MW.
Nothing crazy when you see the same movement and the same weapon (striker 45) from MW 2019. And the red dot from Vanguard. Aaand the sound design from WW2. Easy to get that dejavu when they recycle 99% of the content.
🤌🏼
"THATS TOO LOUD" while screaming 😂 I love this guy
1:43 that lag moment, on that map unlocks some good memories
God this Justin makes me miss modern warfare 2019 the memorys 😢 the gameplay on that was smooth as butter
Ah Yes a full price dlc game with upcoming battlepass and in game currency
it doesnt feel like AAA game anymore
i would definitely play this for free or less
I think it is the 120hz that makes it look okay. It looks the same as MWII imo. Maybe a little worse. Not sure how I feel about this yet.
Its a patch to adjust movment speeds, remove perk charge times and add new maps and guns
The name licensing isn’t necessarily a money thing, some companies just refuse to give out licenses to COD to avoid controversies. I think it happened back in the day with ACR and then it happened with MW2019.
No, it's a california gun advertising law problem. In california (where Activision is based in) advertising guns is prohibited and having the real name of guns in video games counts as advertising.
The time to kill looks so much better. Also the guns don’t have there real names due to copyright that happened a year or so ago and yes it’s very dumb
i like that the guns dont have the og name still, as you can make different guns with a platform people call something else, like how you can turn the m16 in mwii into an m4a1 carbine (except burst fire), since the m4 in the game doesnt have a carry handle option in the sights menu (which i desperately hope they add to mwiii!). and another great example of that is the p890, which is based of the sig sauer p220, which i think can be turned into a five seven, but can be turned into somewhat of a colt 1911 (the daemon is based off the KIMBER 1911! it's more modern and definitely more stylish, but it's notorious for jamming on the first bullet of it's magazine so be careful, check out the kimber 1911 rapide if you're a gun nut, it's beautiful), and definitely a hk usp too.
its the p226 and you can convert it into the p226 X5 supercomp (fattest slide), the p226 X6 (longest slide) and the p229 (shortest slide). no 1911 and defenitly no 5-7.
@@simonm6546 alright, cool, thank you for correcting me!
Tbag please make a bf1 video ranking every operation from worst to best.
Smart way to buy mw3 is wait for it to go on sale and then it’s gonna be a 30-40$ dlc instead of it being a $70 dlc
Waste of money, just buy food or pay bills
@@Yea___ or just buy food :,D
Damn, two tbag vids in one week?
Shame we don't have the bf1 tree ranking vid yet.
So its going to cost an arm and a leg... but micro transactions will still be the only thing they care about.
Sledgehammer Guns sound like a pen being tapped on a desk at 1,000 RPM
The "micro uzi" can be the PM83 "Glauberyt" the old Polish smg. Im not sure tho
It's a Mod or expansion on Mw2 all they seemingly added or "re added" slide cancel and reload cancel... which is not a feature it was a bug. They added or re added old maps. A few new Dlc guns same old killstreaks from previous cods this is 70$ this is better off being a 35$ expansion
Finally an honest review. Also, is it just me or did they take the clear sight and the hit market sounds from Vanguard?
3:59 that van had double doors!
I like it when Tbag loses temper.
3:32 IKR??? man getting a headshot in mw2 gave me a headache atleast this one is not as high pitch
Cool MW2 video, bro!
"Me likey"
Tbag 2023 😂
7:16 I thought that was warden from R6 for a sec 💀
Totally agree! The graphics didn’t seem that vivid. And shots from some auto weapons didn’t do too much. And very loud indeed. And the exact movement engine as MW2 and vocal stabs but with updated old school maps. Maybe the final version will be better.
It feels like vangaurd and soundeffects is exactly just like vangaurd
Looks like it. Please rank the windows in bf1. There are big ones, small ones, ones with no glass etc.
The MTZ 556 irl is a Czech rifle named CZ805 Bren 2
me here again asking for historically accurate doors in bf1 ranked from worst to best.
Bloody hell the time to kill is to long and never mind the battle rage on top of it
bro they even brought the og lag from MW2 back holy shit.
Tbag, your lookin so dapper at the wedding 🗿🍷
(I got that photo from your Instagram account)
They did it again, Modern Warfare 2.5 except even closer.
yeah, it really is, 70 bucks for a dlc, its bananas
nowadays its bananas... full price foods, electronics, games.... list goes on..
And people still buy this shit! Unbelievable
I like the gun sounds. Also the retro U.I.’s kind of interesting.
The gun sounds are shit af.
The game doesn't even look any different from MW2. The OG MW3 atleast tried to change the aesthetics of the weapons, gear, graphics etc. But with MW23. It looks exactly the same.
So apparently there's no stim, battlerage is a non-lethal now
You're not the only one. Hit markers and kill sounds are way over the top
I bought MW2 because i loved the 2019 one ,and they said it would have a 2 year cycle, then they changed that, i really like mw2 but i think a game gets to its full potential more than a year after release at least for cod, something about the vibe of mw2 gets me but if they are going back to every year cods guess im done for know with the series , ill still buy mw3 after months , just for the story because i really like where its going but not at lunch , still the beta looks fun , but whats the point? if another one will come next year.
If this "game" was a dlc for mw2 then i would be happy af , of course i would buy it , but activision had to to their thing
I’m still confused why they would release another MW game after the last one only came out a year ago I think and the one before that had a way longer time difference
If he kills me, I'm going to commit some...thing I'm not going to say for youtube. Absolutely great TBAG.
I agreed.
Its still look like mw2
When i first saw the gameplay.i was like wait whaat .? Is it mw3 or mw2?😂
After i saw the CODnext video i kinda have hopes for this game
i hope the campaign is good
It really feels like Sledgehammer kept some stuff from COD WW2, but I can’t really put my finger on what.
The sound when the character is under enemy bullets’ suppresion seems to be exaclty the same for me.
Edit: also the enemy death’s sound
In defence of CoD not having real life firearm names, it's not up to them, but the weapons manufacture. No one wants to be sued like Remington and if they can't have most of the real life names, they might as well fictionalise all of them for consistency. I do agree with you however, I've always prefered having the real weapons featured.
Either way, they are still guns that kill. If they are still based on the real firearms, I'll be glad to have something that looks functional and practical.
You can get it licensed by their legal owners to use the names as OP also mentioned in the video
bro the beta installs on top of the MW2 file that I have installed. It’s literally a DLC
"ME LIKEY" - TBag 2023
Good thing I decided to pass up on MWll
Campaign expansion and new season. Wooo
Short answer: Yes, yes it is
The UI looks exactly the same as MW2022 except the font just looks 100 times worse
1:47 so it it's just me that's having lagging problems 💀
Dude, they used the same audio records from MW2 for the killstreaks lol
No, you’re not the only one complaining about the sound of headshot me too.
what is going on with the graphics!!?? did u try to disable the 120HZ
Keep going🥰
I noticed the SVA 545 is an AN-94 but comply unrecognizable. it does not have a canted magazine and the gas block is upside down (the gas black would be on top of the barrel while this AN-94 copy cat has it under the barrel) I wont lie that bugs me. other than that good video. As to what I think I rather keep playing Mw 2019 and mw2 2022.
For me MW2 was a downgrade when it comes to a weapon authenticity. And MW3 seems to be even worse.
@@arlequinn5936Fair point. I do agree that there were some creative choices between MW and MW2 that I think made MW2 weaker. As to MW2 and MW3 I can see your point. But again the SVA is just painful to see when MW 2019 has a model accurate version.
The SVA looks like that one bootleg AK from MGSV the enemies mostly used
Luckily if you plan on buying mw3 all mw2 guns transfer which are alot better in sound and visual quality but I don't know how authentic to real life guns mw2 guns are
@@NateTheGreat368 To be honest most of the guns are faithful to their IRL counter parts. I only brought up the SVA because it is a An-94 that is not accurate to the real gun model. As to MW2 gun sounds and looks I do like them I think its more of a preference to what IW did in 2019 that to me at least holds up more. But true if MW3 comes at a discount sometime in the future and has some good stuff to it and the current cod (in future) is garbage I would get it.
I don't see a point in buying a game that has the same ui some same assets in warzone 3(the loot boxes and perk packages) that's being priced as a full game
I have a family member that works with Activision
They told me this was originally dlc that was going to be 30$
But the heads themselves wanted to do a test run on sheep cod buyers. If they will buy the same game that’s callled a different game. That’s really just dlc for full price.
If the game sells well they will keep this formula for awhile! Since we know most call of duty players have low IQs & buy these games every year that takes way the best features! They know it will allways sell!
Mw3 is mw2 with old maps
Updated, fixes & tweaks noting more or less!
Same code too!
I have more details but I’m not a gaming channel 😂
Yeah I realize that after trying MW3 bro 😂😂
Modern Warfare 2019 was my first ever COD and probably my last
Been playing this game for the past year other than the fact it’s airsoft instead of real weapons.
It probably is
Now please rank all bf1 operations from worst to best :)
Yes, question answered- next question?
Me Likeee....Dies....Me no Likeee LOL
The way it looks kind of reminds me of vanguard graphics and gun play
Absolutely gun sounds and feeling are shit af. Exactly like vanguard, If you didnt play the beta yet.
TOGGLE TACTICAL
TBAG wat is the ww2 game name that jou playd 3 days n go
If you told me this is modern warfare 2, i would belive you
Remember when a Battle Pass wasn't nearly half the price of the game? Yeah me neither.
I’m happy I’m not the only person that thinks mw has ridiculously loud gun shots that are un proportional to everything else in the game🤣