Generative AI and Copyright Law: CIPIL Seminar

Speaker: Dr Alina Trapova, UCL
Biography: Dr Alina Trapova is a Lecturer in IP Law at University College London (UCL) and a Co-Director of the Institute for Brand and Innovation Law (IBIL) at UCL Laws. Prior to that, she worked at the University of Nottingham as an Assistant Professor in Law and Autonomous Systems and Bocconi University as a Research Assistant and Coordinator of the LLM in European Business and Social Law. Alina's research interests focus on copyright law and the implications of machine learning and artificial intelligence on the creative industries. Alina also has a keen interest in EU law, particularly in examining the EU's law-making powers in the field of IP law. She is also a keen blogger and acts as a Co-Managing Editor of the well-known Kluwer Copyright Blog.
Abstract: AI-generated output has been a topic for discussion in the past years in academic, institutional and governmental circles. The topic involves a copyright challenge on both the input and output stage: (i) is an AI system engaging in copyright infringing activities when it processes information for the purposes of training; and (ii) are the outputs of these systems protected with copyright law as original works? While answers to these questions have remained difficult to find, a new type of AI systems have come to light - generative AI. These typically engage in the so-called prompt engineering activity whereby images and music are generated as a result of written text instructions. The copyright law puzzle becomes even more difficult to put together. This seminar will paint the picture of these issues by referring to EU, UK, and US copyright law due to ongoing litigation in these jurisdictions, as well as legislative and policy initiatives.
For more information see: www.cipil.law....

[@aarushirelan646]

Very Informative!

[@shanefinlay9203]

Very helpful and informative. I'd love your thoughts on private LLM's with T&C's on human led subject matter expert content. - Perhaps you are aware of what Morgan Stanley and Vodafone are doing don't this? Happy to discuss. I've sent you a linkedIn request. Cheers

[@redwithblackstripes]

You'll own nothing and be happy, not even your imagination.

[@IKnowNeonLights]

A game, any game, all possible combinations of games work as such. Think in regards to being, existence in all of its possible ways one can think, apply constraints, constrictions and limits as ways and methods to such being, and a set of, or a particular action will have (N) possible combinations. Being that game requires to always pick one, that will lead to an (N) result which according to the constraints, constrictions, and limits applied as a (N) start to an (N) end, can and will be taken as forwarded advantage or a forwarded disadvantage off and by the game.
The crucial part is this, it is the actual being itself which is applying the game with its set constraints, constrictions and limits by and off it self, to it self, which requires off and by itself to fallow as itself. This means the concept of being intelligent applies only and only to begin, always.
To collect, take, save, hold enormous amounts of a, any and all possible combinations of copies (called data) off and by being, apply constraints, constrictions and limits in order to produce (N) results through an (N) start to (N) end which can then be forwarded as an advantage or disadvantage to actual being should be illegal within most ascending and descending levels and degrees of existing order, especially if and when such (called data) correspond directly to life forms, as in the case of human beings, landscape, water, wind, or the usual physical and living stuff.
It should be illegal not out of anyone's want, but because it is already illegal for most police forces, judicial systems, education and health systems, employees, and civilians, in fact the most feared intelligence agencies have such illegality applicable to their system, or the intelligence part has to be given up.
Never in the history of mankind has such structure been forwarded as a possible solution to humanities problem, not in such a way or such a scale. If this were to be forwarded by the Nazi, Fascist, Dictatorial or any other similar in operating system, and upon asking an admission is the most likely outcome, a categorical denial would be instead, and such denial would be right and proven through documentation. With an extreme interest by and off such systems to use this new structure instead of their old one.
In most simplest digital terms, if and when any game requires an x command for example as a change of circumstances, it means the game is already set to react to such an x command through an (N) start to an (N) end, that is how all games work, and none of such games are intelligent.
On the other hand, if and when one swaps the requirement of an x command within the exact same game with a, any and all possible combinations of lateral life, physical existence or the usual living stuff, such as millions of possible face angles for example as a change of circumstances, the game will proceed exactly as it has been set through an (N) start to an (N) end. Such a game is always not intelligent, and will remain so always. Because it is not the game learning but the always changing circumstances of being, it is a bugger but that how being is.
In such a circumstance one is faced with an intelligence agency as a operating system for day to day life or instead a democracy. The democracies insisting one is the other and the other is the other one, are in most simplest terms incorrect, in fact are not democratic at all be it left, right, middle or coloured, simple based on the fact that none democracies do not insist so, unless advantageous or disadvantageous to do so.
Coercing crucial part of state and government structures, civil society, private or even the civilian public, to think games are intelligent even as a artificial term or supposed construction, first all it should be illegal, then once presented as games, at minimum strict levels of illegality should be applicable as it usually is, unless everyone has given up.
One might call it
(Information Technology Solution Games)
(ITSG)
© Emir Doçaj
April 19/2024

[@taimoorkhan4216]

the teacher just wasted time and didn’t explain anything