Interesting, but I think the question of whether contemporary continental philosophy is a response to the work of Heidegger is still an open one, it's interesting Critchley includes Deleuze in this, echoing if I'm not mistaken Badiou's characterisation in The Clamour of Being .. I wonder what Manuel Delanda would say ..
and of course everybody is quoting political.. & 'geist' in holderlin is much more complex, he seems to use it more and more as a summary, samenvatting, of a complex (of bodies-anticipations) he went through.. the 'term' changes, of course, him still using it in writing towards the end and after the written hymns, odes, tragedies.. and fragments.. bye now & speaker on 34. says he doesn't know what the choir is for on stage.. & the philosophers talk, the birdies are singing
An object is existence without being and the horror of existence is what an object is and existence without being is all around us for we live in a world of objects that exist-there without being-there and to our absolute horror there are even humans there that exist without being existing-there-without-being-there for existing-there is not being-there: Ontology for Heidegger is Obology just as Ontology for Harman is Obology and Obology for Heidegger and Harman is objectified-being-into-obing.
Interesting, but I think the question of whether contemporary continental philosophy is a response to the work of Heidegger is still an open one, it's interesting Critchley includes Deleuze in this, echoing if I'm not mistaken Badiou's characterisation in The Clamour of Being .. I wonder what Manuel Delanda would say ..
and of course everybody is quoting political.. & 'geist' in holderlin is much more complex, he seems to use it more and more as a summary, samenvatting, of a complex (of bodies-anticipations) he went through.. the 'term' changes, of course, him still using it in writing towards the end and after the written hymns, odes, tragedies.. and fragments.. bye now & speaker on 34. says he doesn't know what the choir is for on stage.. & the philosophers talk, the birdies are singing
An object is existence without being and the horror of existence is what an object is and existence without being is all around us for we live in a world of objects that exist-there without being-there and to our absolute horror there are even humans there that exist without being existing-there-without-being-there for existing-there is not being-there: Ontology for Heidegger is Obology just as Ontology for Harman is Obology and Obology for Heidegger and Harman is objectified-being-into-obing.
Heraclitus...relentless reshaping of beings.