Our First Tarantino movie and it was NUTS! Want to watch 4 weeks EARLY and access our UNCUT reactions? AND Vote for what Movie we watch next over on Patreon! www.patreon.com/spartanandpudgey
now that you've seen Tarantino's work and Christoph Waltz's mindblowing acting, you HAVE to watch Inglourious Basterds!! one of the greatest movies ever
Specifically this is a tribute to “spaghetti western” style. Tarantino has often talked about his love for Sergio Leone’s “dollars” trilogy starring Clint Eastwood. The intro song especially reminded me of a Leone film.
Rango!!!!! 😂 Most of us at home all knew were your brain was at Pudgey don’t stress it mate 😝 Now I can’t stop picturing a cowboy lizard going on a rampage through town!
Old stephen hates Jango because Stephen has sold his soul for what little freedom and status he has while Django has more freedom and status than Stephen will ever have. When he finds out Django got all that without torturing and enslaving his own people his rage is brutal because Django proves Stephen did all those horrible things for nothing.
The reason for the black spit is chewing tobacco. Also, you have to understand that up until the end of the 19th Century there wasn't exactly a thing as everyone brushing their teeth. Most people only rinsed their mouth. In fact, there is a historical town where they have everything preserved. The tooth brush that you could rent was communal. Yes, they shared the tooth brush. They also shared the bathtub in brothels. The water would get changed a couple times a day, but it would continue to be used by different people. 30:24 No, he couldn't be saved. Schultz was showing weakness. There was absolutely no reason for someone in his role wanting to get into the Mandingo business showing any concern for a random "broken" slave. Django stepping in like he did saved their cover. 57:00 Here's the easiest way to understand this movie. If it has to do with slavery, it's serious. If it has to do with fighting it, its played for laughs. One example. When they depict any pain inflicted on black people it is played absolutely straight and depicted with full cruelty. When Django starts blasting slavers, the blood geysers are over the top, the "victims" stumble around and curse, and it's generally played with a cartoonish tone. When it comes to the characters, everyone has witty things to say, but it's balanced on a razors edge of tone.
Exactly, it wraps up disgusting facts with action, humor, great direction and snappy dialogue. Many of the scenes don't hold back. Nobody would pay attention any other way. People are banning books because they don't like facts. Tarantino is a genius.
As someone who grew up in the southern US, that hot box is one of the most horrifying things in this movie to me. Imagining the southern summer sun beating down on that metal box while being forced to lay in it. I don't know how anybody could survive long without suffering immensely and then succumbing to heat stroke. This might be Tarantino's most violent movie, but nothing he shows here would be beyond the realities of many slaves in the US of this time, and some people still try to glorify the time period and the people who fought one of our bloodiest wars to preserve slavery.
Worst part is that a few years ago they tried to accuse of him being a racist because the n word was used many times in the movie by white people, totally looking passed the fact he made a movie about a slave getting to kill slave owners.
@@NecramoniumVideoI mean, the guy seems to really like the N-word beyond this film. He cast himself to say it multiple times in Pulp fiction. I'm sure there's an interview out there where he talks about his reasoning for that but I'm just not overly interested so it's whatever (*by that I mean his use of the word) Lol
@@that.ll_do_pigI don't care about Tarantino, personally, but this movie is an ironically fitting depiction of the greatest shame of my country. I don't see his use of "nigger" or whatever as some dog whistle or indication of racism.
Django wasn't getting lost in his character when he told Calvin that King Shultz wouldn't reimburse him for his slave, which caused Calvin to have him killed by dogs. King Schultz almost blew their cover and Django saved him.
He also knows that the man who was torn apart by dogs wasn't going to have a future either way. Either he would die right there or he would die in a fight. Django was counting his losses and fighting to save the people he knew he could save: King Schultz and Hilde.
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the slave masks were used on troublesome slaves who were prone to spit or bite their handlers. ------- Tarantino used those masks in the movie to show the brutality of slave treatment.
leo's acting in this is next level and also the glass smash and bleeding was an accident of his acting he wasnt ment to cut himself but he kept acting through it and made that scene amazing and you didnt notice quentin tarantino in the film lol
@@larrykile3190 it's partially true. he cut his hand accidentally and acted through it, but the part where he smears it on hildie is from the reshoot. obviously you should never ever smear your real blood on a fellow actor's face.
Thank you for stating the ACTUAL fact and not the myth, but you should specify that the closeup shot of Hilde's face being rubbed with blood was part of a reshoot to keep consistency, and wasn't actual real blood being smeared on her face.
This is definitely how all his movies are like. He plays with timelines a lot. His movies can be a bit confusing, but that's what makes them so good. He has such a unique style of film making. You guys have to check out more of his movies like Inglorious Basterds, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, and Reservoir Dogs
You guys need to watch these ASAP!!! •PULP FICTION •ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD •KILL BILL Vol: 1 & 2 •THE HATEFUL EIGHT •INGLORIOUS BASTARDS •DEATH PROOF •JACKIE BROWN •RESERVOIR DOGS His style of films are so beautiful and fun to watch!
Fun tidbit for a cameo: the guy who comes up to Django at the bar and says he knows the „d“ is silent is Franco Nero who played Django in the original eponymous western movie…
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the brilliance of Tarantino is his use of comedy to diffuse the horror surrounding the degrading conditions of the slave trade. -------- Eventually by the end of the movie the gloves come off with respect to the brutally in the movie.
@@PROVOCATEURSK Yes. White slave media can be seen with "Sparticus", "Gladiator" and the TV show, "Rome". ------- White slavery during this time was called Apprenticeship. ------- Where a person could be bound to a business owner for as much a 10 years with minimal pay and harsh working conditions.
Finally some Tarantino 😍 I love this movie so much, Tarantino always makes you feel like you watch a proper movie. The style, the cinematography, the dialogue... everything is so immersive to me ^^
All of these things done to the slaves in this movie was a real thing. The hot box., Mandingo fights, breaking families up and selling them the head mask they would lock on their head and soo much more.
That's Why QT is one of my favorite directors. Like five of his movies are in my Top 10 favorite movies of All Time. It's his details and fact checking when he writes a movie. He really talks to multiple historians before he writes These movies and actually gets information about things that a lot of movies about Slavery don't cover. Like for instance "The Cleopatra Room" that's where they would take the Most Beautiful female Slaves and Doll them up to entertain guests mostly Rich White Slave Owners or Any rich White Men from All over the world visiting the South. I've never heard anyone talk about The Cleopatra Room on TV or in School. I know about it from my Family's history Stories being told to us. I got a lot of family members that lived a long life and I'm 46. My Great Great grandpa was Born in 1877 & Died when I was 9yrs old in 1987 & he was still smart as a Whip and told us a lot of stories. He was born after slavery but the stories he got were first hand experiences. Like for instance his Grandmother was from Egypt and basically a "Pet" or Arm Candy for a very Rich White Man Who Bought and Sold Slaves For Slave Owners. Kinda how Calvin Candy was with Sheba and told her she could stay & she said "I knew you didn't mean me"
Basically all historians I’ve seen weigh in have said Mandingo fights were not a real thing, if they ever happened in any form (there can always be super rare exceptions) they were nothing like presented. It’s an anachronism and even the name for it seems to have come from a late 50s exploitation novel. Tarantino has said the 70s blaxploitation film by the same name is one of his favorites. That doesn’t at all diminish the brutality and core inhumanity of chattel slavery, you don’t have to add ahistorical details to be worth complete disgust. Per historians, there are no direct records of anything like this and with as large of an investment as slaves were fights with high risk, much less expectation, of severe disability or death just don’t make sense. Again there can be exceptions, there are a few interview accounts far later from former slaves describing organized fights but from what I understand it’s tenuous and rare evidence it happened outside of specific rare situations vs there being some organized fight circuit like the movie suggests.
I'm not going to take the word of mostly white historians who lots of them try to downplay the evil shit white people did to slaves including castration of the strongest male slaves and the raping of female slaves through force and threat of separating their family members
This one of my favorite films of all time. Such an amazing and awesome story. All the actors absolutely kill their roles, even the extras and side characters.
The Aussie Actor is John Jarrett, TV Presenter in Australia, and Actor, most notably the Wolf Creek 1 and 2. Also, the actor for Dr King Shultz, Christoph Waltz was also in another Tarantino film, Inglorious Basterds. The Guy Django shoots (and blows up), that is Quentin Tarantino.
Now that you have seen Christoph Waltz play the best german good guy ever, you HAVE TO watch Inglorious Basterds where he plays the worst german bad guy ever… and he won Oscars for both, so that tells you all you need to know about the man!
Waltz is brilliant but the world is drowning in german villains, it's so cliche at this point close to a century later, I'm frankly sick of seeing it any more.
@@popded It is indeed a good question why, considering many nations have a much, much higher body count on their conscience, and the two world wars were most certainly a group effort.
30:00 As I see it, when Shultz offers to buy the fighter he has in that moment reached the actual enlightenment of how wrong all he has witnessed has been, and he can’t take it anymore. Unfortunately, he is in serious danger of blowing his and Django’s cover, and if that happens the fighter is probably still going to die and they aren’t going to get anywhere near Hildy. Django has to bail him out because he understands the situation and has already deduced that outcome.
The reason Stephen could joke around and be more assertive with Calvin is because Calvin had a special fondness for Stephen. Coming from a rich plantation owning family Calvin as a child would have a slave assigned to him to act as a valet. Someone in Calvin's position raised on a plantation would not have many if any friends and would use this valet as any child would as a play mate in childhood games which would obviously result in more personalized relationship than with any other slave.
This was Christoph Waltz's second Oscar-winning performance as King Schultz; his previous was as S.S. Colonel Hans Landa in Inglorious Basterds...both directed by Quentin Tarantino. In the scene where Leonardo DiCaprio slammed his hand on the table, he cut it badly. He kept on playing the scene, however. Every Tarantino movie is worth watching...Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, Kill Bill Vol 1 & 2, Once Upon A Time...In Hollywood, The Hateful Eight, and Inglorious Basterds.
I clicked on this so fast, this is my favorite movie. Watching you guys experience a movie such as this one was very interesting. I am sure after watching a film such as this one, had you probably go and do some researching. I know those of us are going to inform you both of a lot that went on in this movie that has so much meaning to it and is unfortunately historically accurate. The way QT infused so much of the horrors of slavery back then here in America was exceptionally well. He is a master of his craft and to me I have it ranked #1 as his best film.
Pudgey, You're talking about Rango in the beginning. With the green lizard. It's also an amazing animated film with a powerful message that I think you two would absolutely love. Not a lot of reactions to it, that would be a great one. But yeah Spartan she's not crazy it is a great movie as well. Rango, not Django. Although this is an ALL time great film as well. One of my favorite Tarantino films.
I love that you are based in Australia, it is always my lunch time in Hungary when you post a video, so there is always something i can watch with my food😂
Little Funfact: Christoph Waltz while being a really serious actor never did much movies before he teamed up with Tarantino. He mostly did TV work for the German and Austrian TV..some real silly stuff in parts as well...but Tarantino saw something in him and boy was he right....He is the good guy here, but man can Waltz pull off a bad guy...he can get scary as fck. Also Jamie Foxx is one of the VERY few people alive who won awards for being an actor, a world class singer and a world class comedian
@SS4Luxray and sing, comedy, impersonations. He may be the most varied talented human on this planet. Love that my first exposure to him was as Wanda on In Living Color in early 90s.
Something really cool, which I don't think I've seen commented yet is the fact that Leonardo DiCaprio actually cut his hand during the dinner scene when he slammed the table. It was unintentional and you can actually see the surprise in some of the other cast members such as Christoph Waltz. They ended up cutting in the middle of the scene so that they could tend to his wound and then apply fake blood which he would use to smear on Hilda's face. What a crazy incredible actor Leo is...
@@emmanuelpaquette3310 This film, or rather this version of Django, is by Quentin Tarentino! It is edited miles better and has amazing camera angles. The characters are well developed and don't have to hide from the original film by Sergio Corbucci.
He cut his hand, but obviously the blood he wipes on Kerry Washington's (Hildy) face isn't real. They cut the scene after he unintentionally hurt his hand, reset after he saw the onset medic and then continued the scene with the addition of fake blood on his hand. Wiping the (fake) blood on Hildy was also an ad lib by DiCaprio so her reaction was genuine. I would've hated that so much. Even someone touching my face out of nowhere, but with fake blood? It weirds me out, but the tense energy of the scene is incredible.
@@vordt4139 Eh, to say that the blood "made" the scene discredits Leo's efforts with keeping the attention and the suspense where it is. Leo made the scene.
when Leonardo DiCaprio smashes his hand on the dinner-table, he did accidentally crush a small stemmed glass with his palm and did really begin to bleed. He ignored it, stayed in character, and continued with the scene.
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the significance of the hand shake at the end of Hildi's purchase is to further humiliate and degrade Dr. Shultz after swindling $11,700 from Dr. Shultz in the purchase of Hildi.(which should have been only $300)
@@russellward4624 Heck you could have bought a plantation for that amount of money. -------- Also, Dr. Shultz should not be even walking around with so much money to have made that transaction happen. ------- Most businessmen of that era world have converted that money into gold or diamonds, to make their fortune much easier to hide. Since I'm guessing he didn't trust a bank.
Yes, correct. He still feels like they're getting too much of what they wanted, and he doesn't like that. So he rubs their faces in it. I would've thought it would've been obvious from...ya know, WATCHING the movie, but nonetheless, thank you for clarifying.
It's more than that. He wants to humiliate Schultz by bringing him down to candy's level. Shaking hands like they're the same and forcing him to do it to show he's superior. Schultz couldn't do it.
I think it's an interesting perspective having you guys react to this because I think you're at the same level as King Schultz who's a bit naive about the depravity and overwhelming nature of slavery. So much so that he underestimates the cruelty of Calvin and thinking he can save people who were already doomed. To the point where he kind of condemns both Django and Hildi because of his overwhelming disgust at truly meeting slavery for the first time. Whereas Django, uttering my favorite line in the film, is just more used to Americans than he is.
I like the symbolism of Django playing a free man, even though he is technically Mr. Schultz's property, and then earning his actual freedom through this.
The Last Song is "Trinity". Every German will now the Song from the great Movie "My Name is Trinity / They Call Me Trinity (1970)" Or in German "Die linke und die rechte Hand des Teufels". Is one of the great Movies from Terence Hill and Bud Spencer.
One of my favorite aspects of the villain dynamic in this film is how easily led Calvin is. Calvin is always visibly trying to read someone, looking them up and down, furrowed brow as he follows along the conversation. He is superficially charming, and is in turn taken in by superficial charm. He is easily thrown off balance when the conversation takes an unexpected turn. You can he is having to focus and make the effort to read everyone enough to just keep up. Contrast Stephen, who you can tell just glances at someone and KNOWS. He reads them like a book, knows something is off, knows where to apply pressure to learn more, and then does so- all in a second or two, and without dropping his character as the servile old coot. How much do you think Calvin relied on Stephen just to make business deals? Stephen's perceptiveness, shrewd maneuevering, and ability to steer his masters' conversation without them even realizing it... there was a reason Steven was at Calvin's shoulder throughout the whole dinner scene when they were talking business. Candyland isn't Calvin's empire, he just reaps the benefits. I can almost guarantee every actual major business deal was only made possible by Stephen. As much as I don't care for defending the devil here, Stephens actions are easy to define as evil but racism like his and his willingness to cross lines that would make a normal human shutter are not necessarily exclusively due to him being evil. It may have been a desperate attempt to survive in his younger years that eventually became his defining traits in his older years. That being said, Stephen is a cruel monster of a man but he's a villain that did what he had to survive. It's a common trope in fiction to have what's called a dark mirror. In the west, it's just good versus evil but no one stops to ask, "would I have been any better if I were born into that life?" It's easy to look at it from outside the box and proclaim our moral superiority but what determines it is how well we would have done in the same situation. Luckily the movies don't show us any suffering in his past, to the viewers he was always an evil Uncle Tom.
Curious if you also have all of this empathy and understanding for Nazi’s and other terrorists??? Every perpetrator has a backstory, but ppl who strangely feel the need to empathize with those who participated in the rape, murder, torture and kidnapping of human beings for more than TWO CENTURIES is weird and sick, and quite revealing
@@amagriggs6009 Understanding is not the same as justification, analyzing the characters' motivations and development does not equate to condoning their actions or beliefs, hence why I referred to Stephen as a monster. Exploring complex characters in fiction allows for a deeper understanding of human nature and historical contexts without endorsing real-world atrocities, further-more you're accusation that I empathize with slavers, murderers, and rapists is a mischaracterization of my analysis, which focused on character dynamics and the psychological aspects of there behaviors, feelings, thoughts and attitudes. Examining how villains are shaped by their circumstances is a common practice in literary and film analysis, and doesn't imply support for their actions. Then of course there's you're question/accusation of whether I have empathy and understanding for Nazis and terrorists witch doesn't address the nuanced discussion of fictional characters in this specific historical setting but I will answer it anyway. NO I do not empathize with Nazis why would I, but at the same time have I aloud my emotions to hinder me from understanding how and why such evil entity's might come into being, no why would I do that, seeking to understand the psychology behind evil actions in a fictional context can actually help prevent such behaviors in reality by recognizing warning signs and societal factors, more-so you're assumption that analyzing villainous characters equates to some sort of hidden inner racism is illogical and stifles meaningful discussions about complex narratives and historical representations in film. So like i said at the start my analysis condemns the actions of Stephen and Calvin while exploring the factors that shaped them, which is a valid approach to character study in film criticism.
Best way to enjoy Tarantino films, is to simply realize that anything can happen, and that characters are all unique, with their own quirks. Its all about the characters and the dialogue, and the unpredictability of it all. Its style above substance, just enjoy yourselves for what it is. These movies are a real treat. Soundtracks are always great in his films as well. Hope you continue your journey with this great Director. Its worth it.
Hey Pudgey, Mandingo refer to large African men. There fighting is equivalent to UFC fighting or NFL players colliding. ------- Except they didn't fight to the death.
Umm no. UFC Fighting and the NFL are fighters and players that are volunteering for a sport and paid very well to participate in it. What Mandingo fighting was slaves being treated like dogs in dog fighting or cock fights. There was no choice. If they refused, they had no value to their owner so they were killed or done something else with but the point is that they were treated as and considered as just animals fighting for sport and gambling. This was not wrestling or gladiator sport or any of that. Please understand the difference and not diminish the brutality of it because it makes people uncomfortable.
@@bryce253 I was not diminishing the horror of Mandingo fighting. I was just giving a brief comparison of modern sports they could related to but with the element of death involved and no choice in the matter. ------ As we saw in the example of dogtanion being of no use to Calvin Candie after 3 fights.
If you go for the genre "revenge fantasy", I think it explains some of the weirdness. It's not a comedy, meant to make you laugh. It's not an action movie, meant to give an adrenaline rush. It's not a tragedy, meant to make you sad. It's revenge fantasy, meant to make you hate the bad guys, and root for the good guys. So the bad guys get built up with scenes of them being terrible human beings, and the good guys get shown as being both fun and epic. And there is over-the-top violence, because there is some catharsis in being over-the-top violent against the really vile bad guys. And then there are a couple wrinkles, like Schultz getting killed and Jango captured, or Jango having to act badly himself to keep his cover.
@24:32 Movie Trivia: The guy with the accent watching the "Mandingo Fighting" is the actor (Francisco Nero) who played Django in the original movie. Later when Jamie Fox (Django) tells him the J in his name is silent, he replies, "I know." Great Easter Egg! So good!
41:10 Leonardo DiCaprio really did accidentally cut his hand on glass but instead of stopping he continued with the rest of the scene, Tarantino liked the authenticity and left in the movie.
When they meet Calvin for the first time, the other man who asks Django his name is the man who origanally played the main roll in the Django movie from 1966 Franko Nero.
Although Tarantino was given shit as a white guy making a slavery movie. -------- Whereas many slavery movies can be avoided by younger audiences. WhenTarantino splices in humor, heroism and love in the pot, it attracts hoards of fans too see his flicks. -------- As such, you observe the horror surrounded by the tale of love and action we see with Django. Not just the depravity and brutality.
@@G_zuz none of them are exploring the trauma, most a retelling actual events. -------- Tarantino created a fictional tale and was able to inject humor to soften the blow of the horrors. ---------- Their aim was to bring attention to events of the past, so that awareness can be brought to them today. -------- Other slave movies for the most part, they stick with the facts, with the creative licence of a movie.
54:28 The 'Bye Miss Laura' part is the funniest for me. Mainly because, not only does she go flying, but she flies 90 degrees away from the source of momentum defying physics twice. Scenes like this are why I classify this movie as part of Quentin's 'Movie Movies' Universe.
One of the most underrated parts of the movie in my opinion is when Steven and Candie are in private and Steven’s accent and demeanor goes from being a frail crazy old man to the most intelligent person on that plantation
The music at the end where Django blows up the house is from "They Call Me Trinity" with Terrence Hill and Bud Spencer. Also a classic western. Definately a must watch.
Our First Tarantino movie and it was NUTS!
Want to watch 4 weeks EARLY and access our UNCUT reactions? AND Vote for what Movie we watch next over on Patreon! www.patreon.com/spartanandpudgey
First Tarantino movie?!? What the hell?! You HAVE to see more!!!
Inglorious Basterds is even THAT much better.
@@WheresWaldo05 as good as Django is, Basterds is absolutely 💯 better!
The green lizard movie is Rango ..you guys are going to like it
@@MyDevilishLullaby I want a fight against pudgey,who would win
now that you've seen Tarantino's work and Christoph Waltz's mindblowing acting, you HAVE to watch Inglourious Basterds!! one of the greatest movies ever
My favorite movie by Tarantino for sure, and one of my favorites in general
SOUND GOOD!!!
YES YES YES
Dominiq de Coco approves!
100%
Guys the classification of this movie is 'Quentin Tarantino'.
Very much this. If you haven't seen his other films either there is plenty to check out!
SO TRUE lmaoo
This! Tarantino movies have they're own classification! All of his movies have this type of strange flow that works so well! Love his movies! 💯🙌
It was pure kino is what it is, cinema at its peak
Specifically this is a tribute to “spaghetti western” style. Tarantino has often talked about his love for Sergio Leone’s “dollars” trilogy starring Clint Eastwood. The intro song especially reminded me of a Leone film.
Rango!!!!! 😂 Most of us at home all knew were your brain was at Pudgey don’t stress it mate 😝 Now I can’t stop picturing a cowboy lizard going on a rampage through town!
Definitely! They should watch that one as well
😅😅pudgey is contagious lol her laughter
I mean.. is that not Rango as well? 😂😂😂
@@haileyfuentes6785 Now you mention it that does track also 😜 maybe just less blood and gore 😉😂😂😂
Old stephen hates Jango because Stephen has sold his soul for what little freedom and status he has while Django has more freedom and status than Stephen will ever have. When he finds out Django got all that without torturing and enslaving his own people his rage is brutal because Django proves Stephen did all those horrible things for nothing.
Hmmm.. never saw it in that way. It makes a lot of sense ❤
The reason for the black spit is chewing tobacco. Also, you have to understand that up until the end of the 19th Century there wasn't exactly a thing as everyone brushing their teeth. Most people only rinsed their mouth. In fact, there is a historical town where they have everything preserved. The tooth brush that you could rent was communal. Yes, they shared the tooth brush. They also shared the bathtub in brothels. The water would get changed a couple times a day, but it would continue to be used by different people.
30:24 No, he couldn't be saved. Schultz was showing weakness. There was absolutely no reason for someone in his role wanting to get into the Mandingo business showing any concern for a random "broken" slave. Django stepping in like he did saved their cover.
57:00 Here's the easiest way to understand this movie. If it has to do with slavery, it's serious. If it has to do with fighting it, its played for laughs. One example. When they depict any pain inflicted on black people it is played absolutely straight and depicted with full cruelty. When Django starts blasting slavers, the blood geysers are over the top, the "victims" stumble around and curse, and it's generally played with a cartoonish tone. When it comes to the characters, everyone has witty things to say, but it's balanced on a razors edge of tone.
Exactly, it wraps up disgusting facts with action, humor, great direction and snappy dialogue.
Many of the scenes don't hold back.
Nobody would pay attention any other way.
People are banning books because they don't like facts.
Tarantino is a genius.
As someone who grew up in the southern US, that hot box is one of the most horrifying things in this movie to me. Imagining the southern summer sun beating down on that metal box while being forced to lay in it. I don't know how anybody could survive long without suffering immensely and then succumbing to heat stroke. This might be Tarantino's most violent movie, but nothing he shows here would be beyond the realities of many slaves in the US of this time, and some people still try to glorify the time period and the people who fought one of our bloodiest wars to preserve slavery.
Worst part is that a few years ago they tried to accuse of him being a racist because the n word was used many times in the movie by white people, totally looking passed the fact he made a movie about a slave getting to kill slave owners.
@@NecramoniumVideoI mean, the guy seems to really like the N-word beyond this film. He cast himself to say it multiple times in Pulp fiction. I'm sure there's an interview out there where he talks about his reasoning for that but I'm just not overly interested so it's whatever (*by that I mean his use of the word) Lol
@@NecramoniumVideoSpike Lee went after him for it but now Django Unchained is a modern classic and nobody even knows the last movie Spike did🤷♂️
@@that.ll_do_pigI don't care about Tarantino, personally, but this movie is an ironically fitting depiction of the greatest shame of my country. I don't see his use of "nigger" or whatever as some dog whistle or indication of racism.
Inglorious Bastards and Hateful Eight.
This! 🙌
Hateful 8 is so good
And Kill Bill
Reservoir Dogs
Hateful Eight is awful they should check other tarantinos before that one
The guy holding the dynamite was Tarantino... Steven was Samuel L Jackson
U seriously had to explain that to him?
@@kdizzle901 yes because guys didn't know Tarantino before.
@@kdizzle901ah yes, every single person on this planet knows what tarantino and samue l jackson look like
@@dieAlbaKidswho Tf doesn’t know who Samuel l Jackson is?
the scene with the dog attack, where Django says "i'm just a little more used to americans than he is" is the best line in the movie in my opinion.
Django wasn't getting lost in his character when he told Calvin that King Shultz wouldn't reimburse him for his slave, which caused Calvin to have him killed by dogs. King Schultz almost blew their cover and Django saved him.
Exactly
Emphatically. 😢
Them misunderstanding that frustrated the hell out of me.
He also knows that the man who was torn apart by dogs wasn't going to have a future either way. Either he would die right there or he would die in a fight. Django was counting his losses and fighting to save the people he knew he could save: King Schultz and Hilde.
Of course they didn't get it
2:00 You're thinking of the animated film _Rango,_ which is also great!
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the slave masks were used on troublesome slaves who were prone to spit or bite their handlers. ------- Tarantino used those masks in the movie to show the brutality of slave treatment.
leo's acting in this is next level and also the glass smash and bleeding was an accident of his acting he wasnt ment to cut himself but he kept acting through it and made that scene amazing and you didnt notice quentin tarantino in the film lol
That's a myth.
@@larrykile3190well he did actually cut his hand and kept going but they reshot the scene afterwards and he was able to keep the same intensity.
@@larrykile3190 no lol actors from the movie and he himself have spoken about it :) type it in youtube it comes up
@@larrykile3190 it's partially true. he cut his hand accidentally and acted through it, but the part where he smears it on hildie is from the reshoot. obviously you should never ever smear your real blood on a fellow actor's face.
Thank you for stating the ACTUAL fact and not the myth, but you should specify that the closeup shot of Hilde's face being rubbed with blood was part of a reshoot to keep consistency, and wasn't actual real blood being smeared on her face.
I so hope you guys watch more Tarantino films 😁
Pudgy got a big brain. No one ever predicts the sheriff had a bounty on him
Welcome to the Tarantino-ism.
He makes fucking bangers that don't seem to make sense or flow normally, but it's so damn good.
It's like it shouldn't work, but it does work!
This is definitely how all his movies are like. He plays with timelines a lot. His movies can be a bit confusing, but that's what makes them so good. He has such a unique style of film making. You guys have to check out more of his movies like Inglorious Basterds, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, and Reservoir Dogs
You guys need to watch these ASAP!!!
•PULP FICTION
•ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
•KILL BILL Vol: 1 & 2
•THE HATEFUL EIGHT
•INGLORIOUS BASTARDS
•DEATH PROOF
•JACKIE BROWN
•RESERVOIR DOGS
His style of films are so beautiful and fun to watch!
Fun tidbit for a cameo: the guy who comes up to Django at the bar and says he knows the „d“ is silent is Franco Nero who played Django in the original eponymous western movie…
Yep! But, movIES. There are a few Django adventures.
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the brilliance of Tarantino is his use of comedy to diffuse the horror surrounding the degrading conditions of the slave trade. -------- Eventually by the end of the movie the gloves come off with respect to the brutally in the movie.
Are there any movies about white Slave from Europe?
@@PROVOCATEURSK Gladiator
@@PROVOCATEURSK Yes. White slave media can be seen with "Sparticus", "Gladiator" and the TV show, "Rome". ------- White slavery during this time was called Apprenticeship. ------- Where a person could be bound to a business owner for as much a 10 years with minimal pay and harsh working conditions.
@@PROVOCATEURSK tons of them. My favorite genre is white slave movies. Really empowers me.
@@PROVOCATEURSK watch the tv show "Spartacus".
"I like the way you die, boy" always hits different.
Perfect response to: "I like the way you beg boy."
This Movie is a masterpiece.
Finally some Tarantino 😍 I love this movie so much, Tarantino always makes you feel like you watch a proper movie. The style, the cinematography, the dialogue... everything is so immersive to me ^^
Proper movie? He's nothing but a copy cat.
@@DestinyAwaits19 So you're saying Tarantino is a fraud?
All of these things done to the slaves in this movie was a real thing. The hot box., Mandingo fights, breaking families up and selling them the head mask they would lock on their head and soo much more.
That's Why QT is one of my favorite directors. Like five of his movies are in my Top 10 favorite movies of All Time. It's his details and fact checking when he writes a movie. He really talks to multiple historians before he writes These movies and actually gets information about things that a lot of movies about Slavery don't cover. Like for instance "The Cleopatra Room" that's where they would take the Most Beautiful female Slaves and Doll them up to entertain guests mostly Rich White Slave Owners or Any rich White Men from All over the world visiting the South. I've never heard anyone talk about The Cleopatra Room on TV or in School. I know about it from my Family's history Stories being told to us. I got a lot of family members that lived a long life and I'm 46. My Great Great grandpa was Born in 1877 & Died when I was 9yrs old in 1987 & he was still smart as a Whip and told us a lot of stories. He was born after slavery but the stories he got were first hand experiences. Like for instance his Grandmother was from Egypt and basically a "Pet" or Arm Candy for a very Rich White Man Who Bought and Sold Slaves For Slave Owners. Kinda how Calvin Candy was with Sheba and told her she could stay & she said "I knew you didn't mean me"
Basically all historians I’ve seen weigh in have said Mandingo fights were not a real thing, if they ever happened in any form (there can always be super rare exceptions) they were nothing like presented. It’s an anachronism and even the name for it seems to have come from a late 50s exploitation novel. Tarantino has said the 70s blaxploitation film by the same name is one of his favorites. That doesn’t at all diminish the brutality and core inhumanity of chattel slavery, you don’t have to add ahistorical details to be worth complete disgust. Per historians, there are no direct records of anything like this and with as large of an investment as slaves were fights with high risk, much less expectation, of severe disability or death just don’t make sense. Again there can be exceptions, there are a few interview accounts far later from former slaves describing organized fights but from what I understand it’s tenuous and rare evidence it happened outside of specific rare situations vs there being some organized fight circuit like the movie suggests.
@@RocketSurgn_I disagree with you fully. Until it's REAL RECORDS OF SLAVES. Then I don't believe it. Wonder who kept the records. Smh
I'm not going to take the word of mostly white historians who lots of them try to downplay the evil shit white people did to slaves including castration of the strongest male slaves and the raping of female slaves through force and threat of separating their family members
@@RocketSurgn_ sounds like something a white person WOULD say lol i dont buy it, slave fighting definitely happened
This one of my favorite films of all time. Such an amazing and awesome story. All the actors absolutely kill their roles, even the extras and side characters.
30:43 If Django reacts to the murder, Candy and his pigs will kill him on the spot.
The Aussie Actor is John Jarrett, TV Presenter in Australia, and Actor, most notably the Wolf Creek 1 and 2.
Also, the actor for Dr King Shultz, Christoph Waltz was also in another Tarantino film, Inglorious Basterds. The Guy Django shoots (and blows up), that is Quentin Tarantino.
He was so good in wolf creek lol
@MrSkinner69 he creeped me the fk out in Wolf Creek, I was so used to seeing him on Play School 😂
Now that you have seen Christoph Waltz play the best german good guy ever, you HAVE TO watch Inglorious Basterds where he plays the worst german bad guy ever… and he won Oscars for both, so that tells you all you need to know about the man!
Waltz is brilliant but the world is drowning in german villains, it's so cliche at this point close to a century later, I'm frankly sick of seeing it any more.
@@headhunter1945 gee, I wonder why? (and in every case, Waltz plays here the hero, so...)
@@popded It is indeed a good question why, considering many nations have a much, much higher body count on their conscience, and the two world wars were most certainly a group effort.
@@headhunter1945I mean… inglorious bastards DID take place in World War II. Not like Germany was a major dictatorship at the time or anything
@@hmonsalve74 And there have only been a zillion movies about that very topic, it's getting old af
Interesting fact Django's costume was inspired by "The blue boy" painting.
One of my favorite movies of all time
30:00 As I see it, when Shultz offers to buy the fighter he has in that moment reached the actual enlightenment of how wrong all he has witnessed has been, and he can’t take it anymore. Unfortunately, he is in serious danger of blowing his and Django’s cover, and if that happens the fighter is probably still going to die and they aren’t going to get anywhere near Hildy. Django has to bail him out because he understands the situation and has already deduced that outcome.
💯 great read!
I laughed a little too hard when Pudgey asked "What's a Mandingo?"
The reason Stephen could joke around and be more assertive with Calvin is because Calvin had a special fondness for Stephen. Coming from a rich plantation owning family Calvin as a child would have a slave assigned to him to act as a valet. Someone in Calvin's position raised on a plantation would not have many if any friends and would use this valet as any child would as a play mate in childhood games which would obviously result in more personalized relationship than with any other slave.
and stephen also was calvins fathers valet.
This was Christoph Waltz's second Oscar-winning performance as King Schultz; his previous was as S.S. Colonel Hans Landa in Inglorious Basterds...both directed by Quentin Tarantino.
In the scene where Leonardo DiCaprio slammed his hand on the table, he cut it badly. He kept on playing the scene, however.
Every Tarantino movie is worth watching...Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, Kill Bill Vol 1 & 2, Once Upon A Time...In Hollywood, The Hateful Eight, and Inglorious Basterds.
I clicked on this so fast, this is my favorite movie. Watching you guys experience a movie such as this one was very interesting. I am sure after watching a film such as this one, had you probably go and do some researching. I know those of us are going to inform you both of a lot that went on in this movie that has so much meaning to it and is unfortunately historically accurate. The way QT infused so much of the horrors of slavery back then here in America was exceptionally well. He is a master of his craft and to me I have it ranked #1 as his best film.
Pudgey, You're talking about Rango in the beginning. With the green lizard. It's also an amazing animated film with a powerful message that I think you two would absolutely love. Not a lot of reactions to it, that would be a great one. But yeah Spartan she's not crazy it is a great movie as well. Rango, not Django. Although this is an ALL time great film as well. One of my favorite Tarantino films.
Rango is also made by the creator of the original Pirates of the Caribbean movies :D
Also based on and inspired by the original Django character from a series of spaghetti westerns.
I would love watching you reacting to even more Tarantino movies! 🎉
24:26 that is the original Django. A great cameo.
I love that you are based in Australia, it is always my lunch time in Hungary when you post a video, so there is always something i can watch with my food😂
More Tarantino:
Inglorious Bastards
Kill Bill
Pulp Fiction
Hateful Eight
Death proof
@@chrisherber1635I don't think that one would be a good idea for Pudgey, given what it's about
@@simonO712 she’s had a traumatic experience involving the subject matter of the movie?
@@simonO712 Can someone explain?
Little Funfact: Christoph Waltz while being a really serious actor never did much movies before he teamed up with Tarantino. He mostly did TV work for the German and Austrian TV..some real silly stuff in parts as well...but Tarantino saw something in him and boy was he right....He is the good guy here, but man can Waltz pull off a bad guy...he can get scary as fck. Also Jamie Foxx is one of the VERY few people alive who won awards for being an actor, a world class singer and a world class comedian
Yeah I remember him in "kommisar Rex" as the scariest serial killer of the entire show
Waltz was the reason Inglourious Basterds was made :D
Jamie Foxx is an entertainment BEAST!
Yeah Jamie’s filmography is really strong and aside from his 3 Oscar nominations (1 win), he’s given some really great performances
I love Jamie Foxx, he is kind of under appreciated imo. I listened to his song 'overdose' like a thousand times when i was a teenager back in 2005.
@SS4Luxray and sing, comedy, impersonations. He may be the most varied talented human on this planet. Love that my first exposure to him was as Wanda on In Living Color in early 90s.
The Aussie accent is hilarious! 😅 Especially Peggy's "I knooooouuuuu".
I can garentee you that EVERYONE wants you to react to all Tarantino's films! Every movie is a great ride
24:26 Fun Fact: This Spanish guy watching the Mandingo fight is Franco Nero...the ORIGINAL actor who played Django in the 60's.
Not Spanish, Italian!
Something really cool, which I don't think I've seen commented yet is the fact that Leonardo DiCaprio actually cut his hand during the dinner scene when he slammed the table. It was unintentional and you can actually see the surprise in some of the other cast members such as Christoph Waltz. They ended up cutting in the middle of the scene so that they could tend to his wound and then apply fake blood which he would use to smear on Hilda's face. What a crazy incredible actor Leo is...
That was no comedy, no splatter, no drama. That was Quentin Tarantino 👏👏👏👏👏👏
That wasn't a Quentin Tarantino movie its a knockoff, the proof there was no foot fetish scene in the movie. Case closed.
And don't forget the feet scenes 😂
@@emmanuelpaquette3310 This film, or rather this version of Django, is by Quentin Tarentino! It is edited miles better and has amazing camera angles. The characters are well developed and don't have to hide from the original film by Sergio Corbucci.
I think you mean noawr comedy, noawr splatter, noawr drama.
Yeah. Dicaprio actually cut his hand for real in that dinner scene. He just stayed in character and continued the monologue.
Truly a cosmic intervention, the blood adds so much to that scene and it was an accident
He cut his hand, but obviously the blood he wipes on Kerry Washington's (Hildy) face isn't real. They cut the scene after he unintentionally hurt his hand, reset after he saw the onset medic and then continued the scene with the addition of fake blood on his hand. Wiping the (fake) blood on Hildy was also an ad lib by DiCaprio so her reaction was genuine. I would've hated that so much. Even someone touching my face out of nowhere, but with fake blood? It weirds me out, but the tense energy of the scene is incredible.
The blood MADE that scene imo.
@@vordt4139 Eh, to say that the blood "made" the scene discredits Leo's efforts with keeping the attention and the suspense where it is. Leo made the scene.
@@ThatSamoanGuyYou sound pretentious.
when Leonardo DiCaprio smashes his hand on the dinner-table, he did accidentally crush a small stemmed glass with his palm and did really begin to bleed. He ignored it, stayed in character, and continued with the scene.
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, the significance of the hand shake at the end of Hildi's purchase is to further humiliate and degrade Dr. Shultz after swindling $11,700 from Dr. Shultz in the purchase of Hildi.(which should have been only $300)
And $12k was the equivalent of $450,000 today.
@@russellward4624 Heck you could have bought a plantation for that amount of money. -------- Also, Dr. Shultz should not be even walking around with so much money to have made that transaction happen. ------- Most businessmen of that era world have converted that money into gold or diamonds, to make their fortune much easier to hide. Since I'm guessing he didn't trust a bank.
Yes, correct. He still feels like they're getting too much of what they wanted, and he doesn't like that. So he rubs their faces in it. I would've thought it would've been obvious from...ya know, WATCHING the movie, but nonetheless, thank you for clarifying.
@@ThatSamoanGuy I think Calvin treated the negotiation similar to the Mandingo fighting. When he has you down he will humiliate you.
It's more than that. He wants to humiliate Schultz by bringing him down to candy's level. Shaking hands like they're the same and forcing him to do it to show he's superior. Schultz couldn't do it.
42:10 Yeah Leo legit cut his hand there, that wasn’t supposed to be in the movie but they just went with it and kept going
08:20 It was illegal for slaves to ride horses in the slave states
56:05 one of the best pauses in cinema 😁
I think it's an interesting perspective having you guys react to this because I think you're at the same level as King Schultz who's a bit naive about the depravity and overwhelming nature of slavery. So much so that he underestimates the cruelty of Calvin and thinking he can save people who were already doomed. To the point where he kind of condemns both Django and Hildi because of his overwhelming disgust at truly meeting slavery for the first time.
Whereas Django, uttering my favorite line in the film, is just more used to Americans than he is.
Also Pretty funny: The guy that get‘s blown up in the end (with the dynamite) is Terentino himself.
Loved your reaction, as always ❤
He loves giving himself hilarious roles. He was the rapey creep whose balls melted off in Planet Terror.
You dont know John Jarratt? Hes a legendary Australian actor, he wasnt chucking on an accent lol.
Send em to wolf creek
They were talking about Jamie Foxx doing the accent haha, cause he sounds very different to John Jarratt
There is also Tarantino’s awful attempt at an Australian accent.
They were clearly talking about Tarantino
@@wastingtime9004 My bad, i should've read their mind.
Inglorious Basterds and also very overlooked Hateful Eight, youre gonna love both
Honestly think you are the first people ive seen to not love this movie.
Damn its sooo good!
I like the symbolism of Django playing a free man, even though he is technically Mr. Schultz's property, and then earning his actual freedom through this.
The Last Song is "Trinity". Every German will now the Song from the great Movie "My Name is Trinity / They Call Me Trinity (1970)" Or in German "Die linke und die rechte Hand des Teufels".
Is one of the great Movies from Terence Hill and Bud Spencer.
One of my favorite aspects of the villain dynamic in this film is how easily led Calvin is. Calvin is always visibly trying to read someone, looking them up and down, furrowed brow as he follows along the conversation. He is superficially charming, and is in turn taken in by superficial charm. He is easily thrown off balance when the conversation takes an unexpected turn. You can he is having to focus and make the effort to read everyone enough to just keep up.
Contrast Stephen, who you can tell just glances at someone and KNOWS. He reads them like a book, knows something is off, knows where to apply pressure to learn more, and then does so- all in a second or two, and without dropping his character as the servile old coot.
How much do you think Calvin relied on Stephen just to make business deals? Stephen's perceptiveness, shrewd maneuevering, and ability to steer his masters' conversation without them even realizing it... there was a reason Steven was at Calvin's shoulder throughout the whole dinner scene when they were talking business. Candyland isn't Calvin's empire, he just reaps the benefits. I can almost guarantee every actual major business deal was only made possible by Stephen.
As much as I don't care for defending the devil here, Stephens actions are easy to define as evil but racism like his and his willingness to cross lines that would make a normal human shutter are not necessarily exclusively due to him being evil. It may have been a desperate attempt to survive in his younger years that eventually became his defining traits in his older years. That being said, Stephen is a cruel monster of a man but he's a villain that did what he had to survive. It's a common trope in fiction to have what's called a dark mirror. In the west, it's just good versus evil but no one stops to ask, "would I have been any better if I were born into that life?"
It's easy to look at it from outside the box and proclaim our moral superiority but what determines it is how well we would have done in the same situation. Luckily the movies don't show us any suffering in his past, to the viewers he was always an evil Uncle Tom.
just watch the malcom x description of the field negro and the hose negro, then u will understand steven
i meant steven
Curious if you also have all of this empathy and understanding for Nazi’s and other terrorists??? Every perpetrator has a backstory, but ppl who strangely feel the need to empathize with those who participated in the rape, murder, torture and kidnapping of human beings for more than TWO CENTURIES is weird and sick, and quite revealing
@@amagriggs6009 Understanding is not the same as justification, analyzing the characters' motivations and development does not equate to condoning their actions or beliefs, hence why I referred to Stephen as a monster. Exploring complex characters in fiction allows for a deeper understanding of human nature and historical contexts without endorsing real-world atrocities, further-more you're accusation that I empathize with slavers, murderers, and rapists is a mischaracterization of my analysis, which focused on character dynamics and the psychological aspects of there behaviors, feelings, thoughts and attitudes. Examining how villains are shaped by their circumstances is a common practice in literary and film analysis, and doesn't imply support for their actions. Then of course there's you're question/accusation of whether I have empathy and understanding for Nazis and terrorists witch doesn't address the nuanced discussion of fictional characters in this specific historical setting but I will answer it anyway. NO I do not empathize with Nazis why would I, but at the same time have I aloud my emotions to hinder me from understanding how and why such evil entity's might come into being, no why would I do that, seeking to understand the psychology behind evil actions in a fictional context can actually help prevent such behaviors in reality by recognizing warning signs and societal factors, more-so you're assumption that analyzing villainous characters equates to some sort of hidden inner racism is illogical and stifles meaningful discussions about complex narratives and historical representations in film. So like i said at the start my analysis condemns the actions of Stephen and Calvin while exploring the factors that shaped them, which is a valid approach to character study in film criticism.
29:45 They're chewing tobacco.
Stephen ran candy land. Not Calvin. I think this was samuels best role to date 😂 was just brilliant
He's the representation of the dragon ('Fafnir') from the tale Doc Schultz was referring to when he heard Hildi's name.
Hey Spartan and Pudgey, I believe the actors at the end of the movie were Aussie. And yes that's how you guys sound to us.
Apparently Pudgy has never heard of "chewing tobacco" before, and I got a dip in my mouth right this second as I type this.
Gross....
Yeah I was like “do they not have that in Australia?”
@@robtintelnot9107Agreed.
Spartan: "What the hell just happened?! This is the most random movie ever!". Welcome to Quentin Tarantino, haha
Except, "random" is probably the least accurate description of this movie ever.
18:00 "They kinda remind me of the KKK ."😂😂😂😂......um yeah.
waltz & tarantino is a dream match. waltz is one of my favorite actors. also i just love this theme song :)
Pudgy was thinking of the movie “Rango” with Johnny Depp.
Steven is such a good hype man
Also, Django Reinhart is one of the most famous Jazz musicians from the 20th century.
Best way to enjoy Tarantino films, is to simply realize that anything can happen, and that characters are all unique, with their own quirks. Its all about the characters and the dialogue, and the unpredictability of it all. Its style above substance, just enjoy yourselves for what it is. These movies are a real treat. Soundtracks are always great in his films as well. Hope you continue your journey with this great Director. Its worth it.
Hey Pudgey, Mandingo refer to large African men. There fighting is equivalent to UFC fighting or NFL players colliding. ------- Except they didn't fight to the death.
Umm no. UFC Fighting and the NFL are fighters and players that are volunteering for a sport and paid very well to participate in it. What Mandingo fighting was slaves being treated like dogs in dog fighting or cock fights. There was no choice. If they refused, they had no value to their owner so they were killed or done something else with but the point is that they were treated as and considered as just animals fighting for sport and gambling. This was not wrestling or gladiator sport or any of that. Please understand the difference and not diminish the brutality of it because it makes people uncomfortable.
@@bryce253 I was not diminishing the horror of Mandingo fighting. I was just giving a brief comparison of modern sports they could related to but with the element of death involved and no choice in the matter. ------ As we saw in the example of dogtanion being of no use to Calvin Candie after 3 fights.
The movie pudgey was thinking about is called rango and yes it’s a lizard cowboy type movie😂
If you go for the genre "revenge fantasy", I think it explains some of the weirdness. It's not a comedy, meant to make you laugh. It's not an action movie, meant to give an adrenaline rush. It's not a tragedy, meant to make you sad. It's revenge fantasy, meant to make you hate the bad guys, and root for the good guys. So the bad guys get built up with scenes of them being terrible human beings, and the good guys get shown as being both fun and epic. And there is over-the-top violence, because there is some catharsis in being over-the-top violent against the really vile bad guys. And then there are a couple wrinkles, like Schultz getting killed and Jango captured, or Jango having to act badly himself to keep his cover.
It's Django. The D is silent, but it's there
a mix of very serious and very funny, Welcome to the world of Tarantino 😁
Rango is such a good movie
@24:32 Movie Trivia: The guy with the accent watching the "Mandingo Fighting" is the actor (Francisco Nero) who played Django in the original movie. Later when Jamie Fox (Django) tells him the J in his name is silent, he replies, "I know." Great Easter Egg! So good!
But real life is serious and funny and ludicrous just like this. This is an amazing movie.
41:10 Leonardo DiCaprio really did accidentally cut his hand on glass but instead of stopping he continued with the rest of the scene, Tarantino liked the authenticity and left in the movie.
I don't know if I love this movie more than Inglorious Basterds
They’re both great in their own right
Spartans eyes after the blade was at Djangos balls....priceless😂
Welp. Now it’s time for “Inglorious Basterds”
Love when pudgey cracks herself up 😂😂😂
Now watch Inglourious Basterds and we will all hate Christoph Waltz just as much as we love him in Django 😂
I watched this in an all-black movie theater in Newark NJ. One of the best cinema experiences of my life!! Such an amazing time!
When they meet Calvin for the first time, the other man who asks Django his name is the man who origanally played the main roll in the Django movie from 1966 Franko Nero.
There goes Candyland because of a handshake 😊
Don’t bother trying to categorize this movie. The genre is called “Tarantino” and it’s amazing.
"Is that what we sound like to you?"
Well, no... the accent they have in the movie is like a tame, moderate version of yours.
Yours is crazy. 😁
Although Tarantino was given shit as a white guy making a slavery movie. -------- Whereas many slavery movies can be avoided by younger audiences. WhenTarantino splices in humor, heroism and love in the pot, it attracts hoards of fans too see his flicks. -------- As such, you observe the horror surrounded by the tale of love and action we see with Django. Not just the depravity and brutality.
He also incorporates it as a fairy tale. Black women don't often get the chance to play the damsel in distress who gets to ride with her knight.
I would rather slavery movies be like this than what they usually make that just feels like exploitng the trauma
@@G_zuz none of them are exploring the trauma, most a retelling actual events. -------- Tarantino created a fictional tale and was able to inject humor to soften the blow of the horrors. ---------- Their aim was to bring attention to events of the past, so that awareness can be brought to them today. -------- Other slave movies for the most part, they stick with the facts, with the creative licence of a movie.
One of my absolute favorite movies, unreal that u two are getting around to it now. Getting out the popcorn and drinks for this one
This is probably the least craziest QT film. Linear plot, easy to follow. Awesome movie.
46:00 where Spartan says "this guy's a Legend"
Quentin Tarantino: No one makes violence more fun.
51:00
"is that what we sound like to you guys?"
Yes. Yes it is.
54:28 The 'Bye Miss Laura' part is the funniest for me. Mainly because, not only does she go flying, but she flies 90 degrees away from the source of momentum defying physics twice.
Scenes like this are why I classify this movie as part of Quentin's 'Movie Movies' Universe.
This is also an ode to old Western movies. Westerns used to never show women dying on screen.
One of the most underrated parts of the movie in my opinion is when Steven and Candie are in private and Steven’s accent and demeanor goes from being a frail crazy old man to the most intelligent person on that plantation
Fun fact: When Leonardo hit his hand on the table at 41:10 You can see the blood on his hand. Cut him self when the glass broke and kept acting.
Fun fact: there is no TH-cam reaction that someone does not mention this fun fact in the comments.
@@threeminuteshate and every one of them think they are the only ones to point it out
The music at the end where Django blows up the house is from "They Call Me Trinity" with Terrence Hill and Bud Spencer. Also a classic western. Definately a must watch.