So if astronomers took photos at different points of our orbit when we would be moving fastest and slowest relative to our collision with Andromeda, how different should we expect those photos to be and do we have evidence of the differences?
Your past, became a moment of my future. It was enjoyed in its fullness of my present. But sadly, as it must be. It is now also a moment of my past that I look fondly back upon while anticipating the next time I get to enjoy your efforts in my future!
Shows how much you know. I'll be watching this next week, so it's my future about your past, but our future when you read this about the past, which will be a present or gift of confusion for us all.
"What the hell am I looking at?" "You're looking at now, now." "Go back to then!" "Now?" "Yes!" "Can't." "Why not?" "We missed it." "When?" "Just now." "When will then be now?" "Soon!" "How soon??"
So something moving fast have more time but moving slow or not moving have less time. Looks at sea turtles living to 200 years Olds hmm I guess they stay in sea currents to be faster while not moving much them selfs. "Shocking twist sea turtles are time traveling farther in time then we are So they are in fact younger then we think they are because they are experiencing less time then we are.
Luis Lopez Your comment does NOT make much SENSE... Look I know you want be funny but then you're telling that you and the ones that like your comment like to accept ANY information even if it has HOLES in it!!!!! Then, you just say its "good"?!... because you don't understand ANYTHING?!... So "imagine" if he made a BAD video (LIKE THIS ONE which IS REALLY BAD!!!) then you're saying that as you don't understand it then you say: "you trust this video"?!... cmon......................................................................................................................................................
I love seeing all the little details in the back of the facility, like the poster that says "Don't forget to get tested weekly for genetic abnormalities"
@@dolst yes, Buffy has appeared in the Buffy several times. I would, but my body is already broken beyond medical aid. At what point does the experience make the pain worth it?
"What the hell am I looking at? When does THIS happen in the move? " "NOW. You're looking at now, sir. Everything that happens now is happening now." "Go back to then! " "What? " "THEN! " "I can't! " "Why not? " "We passed it! " "When? " "Just now! " "When will then be now? " "SOON!"
reality is capitalist. things are born (created), they age, then they're used up (die) and are recycled back into new things. there are NO unlimited resources. its finite. even if its a gigantic amount of resources, it is still finite.
@@jamesbrock8877 huh? Seriously? Heard of "wage slavery"? Of "exploitation"? Well, even Abe Lincoln's Republican Party was against these very unpopular features of the capitalism in the mid-19th century during initial stages America's industrial revolution. But most of our ancestors have, since the 1860s, had that bit of historical anti-capitalism driven out of them. So, today, we all feel, what else is there but being slaves to bosses for wages. And, some of us, actually ask the question, "what's wrong with capitalism?" Unbelievable!
@@barquerojuancarlos7253 @James Brock Both of you need to define capitalism. Debate is useless without a common terminology. And please make sure the definition isn't just a checklist of the points you want to make about it. Instead, it should provide a useful way to distinguish the concept defined from everything else.
Kyle: "Space is big, it's vast, it's bigger than vast, we don't have words to describe how big it is." Me: So you could say it's... SPACE-IOUS? I'll let myself out now.
This is one of the best, most understandable explanations of simultaneity I've ever seen. Thanks for this. Perhaps in the future, you could address what this says about whether our universe is absolutely deterministic. Also, your Carl Sagan is very good, I must say. Well done, all around.
Shh! I don't want determinism, lets stick with free will. Determinism is scary. ☺ OK let's put up a fight I mean a debate. If there are infinite choices then I would think that therefore there's free will, even if there is only a finite number of choices then free will can still exist because you can infinitely choose any one of the finite choices avaliable to you even if you knew the outcome. It's a bit like determinism with free will thrown in. ☺ Sorry if I wasn't too clear.
@@ZeusHelios No, I think you're spot on. Viewed from the outside, our universe is like a two-by-four piece of lumber (with four dimensions), with time being one of its dimensions. It is what it is (heh), and no amount of turning it in our hands and viewing it at different angles will change anything about it along any dimension, including time. The future is as immutable as the past, and everything is 100% deterministic. That the future is as unchangeable as the past and that our universe is 100% deterministic is the logical conclusion we can draw from the way the universe jumps through whatever hoops are necessary to make simultaneity what it is, since one person's future can be another's past (and vice-versa), and both perspectives are perfectly valid. I know some won't accept that one person's future can be another's past and vice-versa, but we see this in other phenomena. Think of two trumpet players playing the same tune. One is standing on the sidewalk, and the other is in the bed of a pickup truck zooming away at 30mph. Due to the Doppler effect, each will swear the other is flat, and both perspectives will be valid. So if the universe is an immutable loaf, there is no free will. However, all our experience tells us that free will exists since we perceive time only in the present moment. All our experience tells us that we CAN change the future, but not the past. We can debate whether the flow (arrow) of time is an illusion and that we're just unchanging chrono-smears in a piece of lumber. But I believe (with admittedly no evidence whatsoever) that our perception of time is valid, and that we live only in the present moment and perceive the arrow of time as a feature of the universe. So does free will exist? From inside the universe, yes, it does. From outside the universe, no, it doesn't. And as with the trumpet players, and as with the two beings in different galaxies experiencing each other's future and past, both perspectives are perfectly valid.
@@Astronomator ☺ 👍. What about consiouness? Does consiouness of our past still exist in our past even though we've traveled forward in time into the future. For example a 10 year old. Would a 10 yrd old still be consious of existing as a 10 Yr old even though that person is say 30 Yrs old now? In other words are our past still there and still self consious of itself existing in that time frame even though its in the past. Also say an consious alien exist on another world 100 light yrs away, we look at each others world from our own worlds seeing each others world as it was a 100 yrs ago. Let's say both human and alien died at 90 earth yrs would they still be consious or does light only carry physical images or does consiouness go with it. I suppose just as a video carries images the images probably don't carry with it consiouness. Silly questions I know probably because of my ignorance of how time works.
@@Astronomator If the universe and our life's are predetermined then all the more we should do everything we can to make our lifes a happy predetermined life. ☺ We should be doing that anyway but some how thinking of a predetermined life is scary to me so all the more I feel I want to put more effort into making sure its a happy predetermined life. ☺
@@ZeusHelios Ah, now you're getting into emergent qualities of the universe: things like consciousness, love, and the creepiness of scorpion mouth parts. I'm no expert in such things, but I would certainly say that if two beings can be living in each others' past/future, then by extension every moment in time (spacetime, actually) is always a valid perspective. Thus, you are always you, in whatever slice of your chrono-smear you choose to examine. So if consciousness is a thing (and I'm not saying it isn't, it's just that I can't prove it), then the ten-year-old is/will-be/always-has-been conscious of his existence twenty years ago.
What the heck am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?! Now, you are looking at now, sir. We are looking at now, now. Everything that's happening now is happening now. Well go back to then Now? Yes We can't Why not? We missed it When Just now When will then be now? Soon
Sir! What?! We've identified their location! Where?! It's the moon of Vega! Good. Set a course and prepare for our arrival! When?! At 1900 hours, sir! By high noon tomorrow, they'll be our prisoners. WHO?!? *slam*
@@SuperVstech sir What? Aren't we being too literal? No you idiot we've been told to comb the desert so we're combing it... FOUND ANYTHING YET? NOTHING YET SIR! WHAT ABOUT YOU GUYS? *SHAKES HEAD* WHAT ABOUT YOU? WE AINT FOUND SH*T
The major problem is simply one of grammar, and the main work to consult in this matter is Dr. Dan Streetmentioner's Time Traveler's Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations. It will tell you, for instance, how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be descibed differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is futher complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations while you are actually traveling from one time to another with the intention of becoming your own mother or father. Most readers get as far as the Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional before giving up; and in fact in later aditions of the book all pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy skips lightly over this tangle of academic abstraction, pausing only to note that the term "Future Perfect" has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be.
There are two ways to approach socal situations, either you're gonna start off by asking them about their parents siblings or what color they want their dogs fur died.. Or you get straight to the point and ask them for spare coins because you lost your subway card
I would love if this channel is building up an ARG with all of the unusual, out of context, sometimes unexplained events that occur. I feel Kyle could do a great job with it over the course of the channel.
Amazing Carl Sagan impression!!! Sagan is my science hero. If I could speak to any person, living or dead, Sagan has always been #1. Right before Bruce Lee :)
"you shouldn't be eating as many carbs as you are" Said at the exact moment I'm shoving spaghetti into a baguette...why you gotta call me out like this, Kyle?
@@丸い地球-y5l how are those even remotely comparable? Spaghetti and bread is awesome. Its a double carb and both are savoury. Salmon and Nutella is taking something sweet and adding everyone's least favourite highly pungent protein: fish. Thats more like putting your Spaghetti in vodka.
I just loved the Command And Conquer reference!! I have always felt that the movies that were included in the story lines were greatly underappreciated.
Also like how this comment is a reply from my perceived present in response to you comment seen in my present yet still representing your past. Both of these post have entered the past and symbolize a societal interaction through the space time continuum roughly 1 hour apart. Perhaps these are not the only 2 post in the chain right now?
7:22 I'm convinced Tim Curry did the whole script in one take without reading it before hand and that line was the absurdity of the whole thing sinking in
Consider you're observation of "now" as a ping in space: the sooner the response -the more relevant to the present, as the ping travels further in space, it travels further in time and becomes less relevant to the present. In order to truly capture a moment in time (to an approximate relevance) you would have to simultaneously collect data from multiple points at once (likely quantum tech), save it, send it, and compile it. From there you would have data account for what's happening in all of those spaces at that given moment. Basis is similar to looking at a mirror in space that is 1 lightyear away. You'll see 2 years in the past. Taking photos of things that are lightyears away results in data that is years old. If you wanna know what their "now" you would need to either be there or perhaps use quantum entanglement tech. Assuming its "entanglement" truly surpasses the speed of light to that degree
The speed of light is also the maximum speed of causality. Nothing can effect anything else faster than light and that includes the transmission of information. Discernible information cannot be sent via entanglement. Even though observation of one particle would cause the wave function of the other to collapse in a perfectly predictable manner, the outcomes would have to be compared to transmit information. How would the two parties observing both entangled particles be able to compare results and communicate their comparison faster than light? That’s the problem
I've always thought that time was a reference of divided sums of our trips around and around the sun (inaccurately) held in place by decay. That time was not the measurement of a distance traveled but about the friends we made along the way.
Well then, when will then be now? But then again, when then is now, what is now if not just then. When you think of it, if then would be now, then now would also be then, which then brings us back to the now-then dilemma.
Sometimes it’s easier to look at it the opposite way, there is no “now,” it’s just the latest ripple in space, time, matter and energy from the Big Bang, where as soon as you’ve consciously observed it, it’s already in a slightly newer state.
"Not to get into too much college level physics" Then you have me just chilling here waiting for classes to start in 3 weeks when I take quantum physics 1.
Dude it just to much, to even lay the foundations of the mechanisms of time would take weeks of talking. And there is no baseline standard, only percieved. As conditions can alter standards, i.e. pressure, temp. Its all the spooky boat ride from Willy Wonka. Im exhausted just imagining the complexity.
@@dustinfirkins5736 oh yeah it definitely is a lot to lay out, but it can always keep my brain interested and thinking. I really enjoy that about time.
4:38 "Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space. Listen..." --DNA
@@TheVitaNerd turn the playback speed down the lowest and go to a second before the time and watch. It's there and def the same represented image of the basilisk, a theory that he covered in a different video.
Dark Helmet: What's happening? Where is this in the movie? Colonel Sandurz: Now, sir. What's happening, now is happening now. Dark Helmet: What happened to then? Colonel Sandurz: We passed it. Dark Helmet: When? Colonel Sandurz: Just now. Dark Helmet: Now? Colonel Sandurz: Now! Dark Helmet: Why? Colonel Sandurz: We missed it. Dark Helmet: When? Colonel Sandurz: Just now. Dark Helmet: When will then be now? Colonel Sandurz: Soon. Dark Helmet: How soon? Colonel Sandurz: What? Dark Helmet: Where? Colonel Sandurz: Good work. Set a course and prepare for our arrival. Dark Helmet: When? Colonel Sandurz: By tomorrow, they will be our prisoners. Dark Helmet: WHO?
Hey Kyle! Love the show! This is something that's perplexed me. If we had the technology to bend space in such a way to communicate to those farther than light has yet traveled, then would it then be possible to be in two places at once? Could you travel to a location where the present you would look and see past you? Could you talk to yourself in two different instances in time? If there's a predetermined future then I think that it would be possible but what if there wasn't? Would it still be possible?
*Thanks for watching my past in your present, nerdling swarm*
So if astronomers took photos at different points of our orbit when we would be moving fastest and slowest relative to our collision with Andromeda, how different should we expect those photos to be and do we have evidence of the differences?
Your past, became a moment of my future. It was enjoyed in its fullness of my present. But sadly, as it must be. It is now also a moment of my past that I look fondly back upon while anticipating the next time I get to enjoy your efforts in my future!
Kyle Hill Relativistically?
Shows how much you know. I'll be watching this next week, so it's my future about your past, but our future when you read this about the past, which will be a present or gift of confusion for us all.
After the thing happened can we agree of what was now at that moment.. ?
Sorry, "present time" like that hypothetical slice.. dunno ha
I started with the basilisk one, and "NOW" I'm in a never-ending loop
Me too. Except I'm doing it now...
The basilisk brought me here also, lol.
Yes but did you see the Basilisk glitch there? Freeze at 4:14 ;)
Same XD
ME TOO
who needs drugs when you have high level physics
I do
Both are preferable
Drugs plus physics equals existential crisis maximum power
@@ipad9844: Drugs plus physics equals string theory.
Quantum physics is the most physics can be on drugs.
You know it is a good paradox when you grasp it, lose it and then re-grasp it when you slow down and think about it.
"What the hell am I looking at?"
"You're looking at now, now."
"Go back to then!"
"Now?"
"Yes!"
"Can't."
"Why not?"
"We missed it."
"When?"
"Just now."
"When will then be now?"
"Soon!"
"How soon??"
"𝐼 𝑎𝑙𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝐼 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑐ℎ 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑟. 𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡! 𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑦 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡!"
This is the exact comment I was looking for.
I would have been sorely disappointed if this comment was not already here
Classic
It's good to be the king
"more than 4 billion years out and you are DEFINITELY not going to make it..."
Challenge accepted.
Oh shit oh fuck they’re too powerful.
You still alive bro ?
I mean, the basilisk is probably gonna keep us alive forever, with or without eternal torment
you still here?
I plan to live forever. So far so good.
You know it’s good physics when you can’t even understand it.
Kylie Minogue's _Come into my world_ can help illustrate the matter a little bit.
Whenever Kyle, VSauce, or Veritasium speak I’m just like “Haha, funny man say big science words!”
Three dimensions of time, one dimension of space, Penrose go brrrrr
So something moving fast have more time but moving slow or not moving have less time. Looks at sea turtles living to 200 years Olds hmm I guess they stay in sea currents to be faster while not moving much them selfs. "Shocking twist sea turtles are time traveling farther in time then we are So they are in fact younger then we think they are because they are experiencing less time then we are.
Luis Lopez
Your comment does NOT make much SENSE... Look I know you want be funny but then you're telling that you and the ones that like your comment like to accept ANY information even if it has HOLES in it!!!!!
Then, you just say its "good"?!... because you don't understand ANYTHING?!...
So "imagine" if he made a BAD video (LIKE THIS ONE which IS REALLY BAD!!!) then you're saying that as you don't understand it then you say: "you trust this video"?!...
cmon......................................................................................................................................................
Me: "If you were really Sagan, you'd be wearing a turtlene--"
Kyle: "I didn't have a turtleneck, shut up!"
Me: 😶
But if he was wearing a turtleneck, he might still not be Carl Sagan, he might be Steve Jobs instead.
@@medexamtoolscom or The Rock
"The smartest men wear turtlenecks."
-Albert Einstein
@@medexamtoolscom or both, at the same time.
He must have had a perspective that allowed him to experience your comment just as you were actually making it.
“WHEN WILL THEN BE NOW?”
“ S O O N “
i understood that reference
I'm surrounded by assholes.
It appears your Schwartz is as big as mine
"What's the matter colonel Sanders, chicken?"
Came here for this. 😂
Me: "pssht, Sagan never wore v-necks."
Kyle literally 1 second later: "I didn't have a turtleneck, shut up."
My wife and me: ･_･ ･_･
it's almost as if he could see into the future ...
or into the present.
lmaooo
I hope you and your wife are doing well these days. Thanks for the comment which made me laugh :)
Hahaha the same happened to me ! XD
"Now entering the facility"
Or are we?
*V-sauce music intensifies*
The very beginning of this video felt very much like V-sauce
So, in the words of Obi-wan Kenobi: "from a certain point of view"
Hello there
@@eliasvsaa General Kenobi
It seems like i am a bold one
My favorite song
=D
I love seeing all the little details in the back of the facility, like the poster that says "Don't forget to get tested weekly for genetic abnormalities"
Me: Tap screen to clear TH-cam's UI. Just happen touch spot where Kyle's shirt is.
Kyle: "Don't touch me."
Are you sure you're in the past?
So glad it wasn't just me! 😂
Also, saw that basilisk... 🥺
Surf Wisely.
I poked him in the eye, he didn't seem to notice...
@@seriousmaran9414 Weird, because I just watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer season 7 episode "Dirty Girls" a few hours ago. 👁😬
@@dolst yes, Buffy has appeared in the Buffy several times. I would, but my body is already broken beyond medical aid. At what point does the experience make the pain worth it?
@@seriousmaran9414 Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
"What the hell am I looking at? When does THIS happen in the move?
"
"NOW. You're looking at now, sir. Everything that happens now is happening now."
"Go back to then!
"
"What?
"
"THEN!
"
"I can't!
"
"Why not?
"
"We passed it!
"
"When?
"
"Just now!
"
"When will then be now?
"
"SOON!"
My braincells
Well you beat me to it.
Was thinking of this scene during the whole of the video :D
Came to the comments just for the Spaceballs references. You did not disappoint.
So what happens to the Paradox when one goes _Plaid_
Kyle: "The one place not corrupted by capitalism... SPACE!"
Elite Dangerous players: "Are you sure about that"
Nevermind elite, Eve would like a word
Sooo, capitalism is bad? How so?
reality is capitalist.
things are born (created), they age, then they're used up (die) and are recycled back into new things.
there are NO unlimited resources.
its finite.
even if its a gigantic amount of resources, it is still finite.
@@jamesbrock8877 huh? Seriously? Heard of "wage slavery"? Of "exploitation"? Well, even Abe Lincoln's Republican Party was against these very unpopular features of the capitalism in the mid-19th century during initial stages America's industrial revolution. But most of our ancestors have, since the 1860s, had that bit of historical anti-capitalism driven out of them. So, today, we all feel, what else is there but being slaves to bosses for wages. And, some of us, actually ask the question, "what's wrong with capitalism?" Unbelievable!
@@barquerojuancarlos7253 @James Brock Both of you need to define capitalism. Debate is useless without a common terminology. And please make sure the definition isn't just a checklist of the points you want to make about it. Instead, it should provide a useful way to distinguish the concept defined from everything else.
Kyle: "Space is big, it's vast, it's bigger than vast, we don't have words to describe how big it is."
Me: So you could say it's... SPACE-IOUS?
I'll let myself out now.
It’s okay. My eyes forgive you lol
its almost like you discovered where that word came from....
You're my new best friend.
You mean yesterday
Well said...(followed by golf clap for 3-5 seconds)
“Andromeda is what astronomers call really far away.”
Oh, is that a technical term?
That is THE technical term
@Ivan hm. Pretentious.
How is that pretentious
@@swine13 small brain micro minded self centered uneducated neurotypical protozoan FOOL.
@@lordfelidae4505 “that was legitness”😂 & I have to borrow that, sorry
Tim Curry's acting in C&C RA3 was the best thing about that game. Change my mind.
"Tim Curry ... best thing" I made you more correct ;)
4:19 "The Andromeda galaxy is on a collision course with the Milky Way... You are definitely not going to make it!"
Well, at least my atoms will.
"You are definitely not going to make it"
Not with that attitude...
That’s the spirit. Way to look at things optimistically.
It's not your atoms, you are just borrowing them
you mean the atoms we've borrowed
Is Andromeda a cluster or spiral, if its a cluster we'll eat it.
This is one of the best, most understandable explanations of simultaneity I've ever seen. Thanks for this. Perhaps in the future, you could address what this says about whether our universe is absolutely deterministic.
Also, your Carl Sagan is very good, I must say. Well done, all around.
Shh! I don't want determinism, lets stick with free will. Determinism is scary. ☺ OK let's put up a fight I mean a debate. If there are infinite choices then I would think that therefore there's free will, even if there is only a finite number of choices then free will can still exist because you can infinitely choose any one of the finite choices avaliable to you even if you knew the outcome. It's a bit like determinism with free will thrown in. ☺ Sorry if I wasn't too clear.
@@ZeusHelios No, I think you're spot on. Viewed from the outside, our universe is like a two-by-four piece of lumber (with four dimensions), with time being one of its dimensions. It is what it is (heh), and no amount of turning it in our hands and viewing it at different angles will change anything about it along any dimension, including time. The future is as immutable as the past, and everything is 100% deterministic.
That the future is as unchangeable as the past and that our universe is 100% deterministic is the logical conclusion we can draw from the way the universe jumps through whatever hoops are necessary to make simultaneity what it is, since one person's future can be another's past (and vice-versa), and both perspectives are perfectly valid.
I know some won't accept that one person's future can be another's past and vice-versa, but we see this in other phenomena. Think of two trumpet players playing the same tune. One is standing on the sidewalk, and the other is in the bed of a pickup truck zooming away at 30mph. Due to the Doppler effect, each will swear the other is flat, and both perspectives will be valid.
So if the universe is an immutable loaf, there is no free will.
However, all our experience tells us that free will exists since we perceive time only in the present moment. All our experience tells us that we CAN change the future, but not the past.
We can debate whether the flow (arrow) of time is an illusion and that we're just unchanging chrono-smears in a piece of lumber. But I believe (with admittedly no evidence whatsoever) that our perception of time is valid, and that we live only in the present moment and perceive the arrow of time as a feature of the universe.
So does free will exist? From inside the universe, yes, it does. From outside the universe, no, it doesn't. And as with the trumpet players, and as with the two beings in different galaxies experiencing each other's future and past, both perspectives are perfectly valid.
@@Astronomator ☺ 👍. What about consiouness? Does consiouness of our past still exist in our past even though we've traveled forward in time into the future. For example a 10 year old. Would a 10 yrd old still be consious of existing as a 10 Yr old even though that person is say 30 Yrs old now? In other words are our past still there and still self consious of itself existing in that time frame even though its in the past. Also say an consious alien exist on another world 100 light yrs away, we look at each others world from our own worlds seeing each others world as it was a 100 yrs ago. Let's say both human and alien died at 90 earth yrs would they still be consious or does light only carry physical images or does consiouness go with it. I suppose just as a video carries images the images probably don't carry with it consiouness. Silly questions I know probably because of my ignorance of how time works.
@@Astronomator If the universe and our life's are predetermined then all the more we should do everything we can to make our lifes a happy predetermined life. ☺ We should be doing that anyway but some how thinking of a predetermined life is scary to me so all the more I feel I want to put more effort into making sure its a happy predetermined life. ☺
@@ZeusHelios Ah, now you're getting into emergent qualities of the universe: things like consciousness, love, and the creepiness of scorpion mouth parts. I'm no expert in such things, but I would certainly say that if two beings can be living in each others' past/future, then by extension every moment in time (spacetime, actually) is always a valid perspective. Thus, you are always you, in whatever slice of your chrono-smear you choose to examine. So if consciousness is a thing (and I'm not saying it isn't, it's just that I can't prove it), then the ten-year-old is/will-be/always-has-been conscious of his existence twenty years ago.
I love when the entire episode is completely over my head, yet the conclusion explains exactly what I thought the actual answer would be.
For true!! This was by far the most difficult episode to wrap your head around lol.
"Deactivate Carl Sagan mode."
I think it was deactivated a while back, you just didn't notice because your moving perspective was fixed on the past.
"I'm hungry you shouldn't be eating as many carbs as youa re shut up"
*Sitting here guiltily with a plate of nachos >.>*
I slowly looked down to my triple cheese pizza and just kept it aside 😭
As long as you'd stick to more unrefined sources of carbs from whole foods, you should be fine 😉
😊
Was eating the party size Lays and remembered that there's more air so i was relieved
Aditya Bairathi I’m eating an entire pizza as well.
@@senzubeanmedic don't worry if there's more cheese than dough you're technically eating more protein than carbs..
I bet Carl Sagan would be stoked to know you're here continuing the work of science communication. His original series was a big part of my youth.
Hear, hear!
I love that Tim curry reference... that expression was awesome😂😂
What about the Joey Lawrence reference?
I completely forgot Tim Curry was in C&C... *Hands in gamer card and TCFC card*
Tim Curry was great. I really thought we were gonna get a Spaceballs, "when will then be now?" ..." Soon"
@@CHIIIEEEEEEEEFFFFSSS" what's the matter Colonel Sanders? Chicken???"
I just found this channel today. This is some seriously high quality content! Thank you for doing this!
"When is now?"
*VSauce intensifies.*
*Cries in Michael*
Q vsauce music*
*Or does it?*
@@juliolp95 Doooooooooo. Do do
What the heck am I looking at? When does this happen in the movie?!
Now, you are looking at now, sir. We are looking at now, now. Everything that's happening now is happening now.
Well go back to then
Now?
Yes
We can't
Why not?
We missed it
When
Just now
When will then be now?
Soon
Sir!
What?!
We've identified their location!
Where?!
It's the moon of Vega!
Good. Set a course and prepare for our arrival!
When?!
At 1900 hours, sir!
By high noon tomorrow, they'll be our prisoners.
WHO?!?
*slam*
Yes. I love Spaceballs.
inception 2 plot confirmed
The-List_1 never watch that scene again.
@@SuperVstech sir
What?
Aren't we being too literal?
No you idiot we've been told to comb the desert so we're combing it... FOUND ANYTHING YET?
NOTHING YET SIR!
WHAT ABOUT YOU GUYS?
*SHAKES HEAD*
WHAT ABOUT YOU?
WE AINT FOUND SH*T
I loved the Tim Curry reference. I immediately knew what you were doing. I appreciate your whole channel.
Prepositions of time for time travelers must will been “fun” ⏳🧠😎
The major problem is simply one of grammar, and the main work to consult in this matter is Dr. Dan Streetmentioner's Time Traveler's Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations. It will tell you, for instance, how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be descibed differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is futher complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations while you are actually traveling from one time to another with the intention of becoming your own mother or father.
Most readers get as far as the Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional before giving up; and in fact in later aditions of the book all pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy skips lightly over this tangle of academic abstraction, pausing only to note that the term "Future Perfect" has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be.
Fosuke M ??
Reminds me of doctor who when the tardis becomes trapped in a person, "tenses are hard"
When ?
"Excruciatingly painful small-talk." That's a mood.
There are two ways to approach socal situations, either you're gonna start off by asking them about their parents siblings or what color they want their dogs fur died..
Or you get straight to the point and ask them for spare coins because you lost your subway card
@@UltraBadass or you win a marathon
This is me every time I have to meet people.
@@evol-yu4mu thinking about it walking doesn't sound too bad, it's gonna be easier than chatting to strangers for sure
@@UltraBadass remember the time someone wrote off winning marathon as just walking?
Still easier than talking to strangers tho
I would love if this channel is building up an ARG with all of the unusual, out of context, sometimes unexplained events that occur. I feel Kyle could do a great job with it over the course of the channel.
What's an ARG? An argument?
To quote Dark Helmet, "When will then be now?"
Soon.
Never.
Oh, it's already now .
Go back to then
"dont touch me" *reaches out and strokes screen*
Amazing Carl Sagan impression!!! Sagan is my science hero. If I could speak to any person, living or dead, Sagan has always been #1. Right before Bruce Lee :)
Not just science, Nick. Where would you rank the Kardashians?
1st Astronaut: Is it now?
2nd Astronaut:
[holds up gun]
Always has been...
This video reminds me of my favorite scene in Spaceballs.
"Let's go back to then!"
"We can't."
"Why?"
"We missed it."
"When?"
"Just now."
"If this week was next week last, then next week isn't this week until next Saturday"
~ Daffy Duck
"you shouldn't be eating as many carbs as you are"
Said at the exact moment I'm shoving spaghetti into a baguette...why you gotta call me out like this, Kyle?
Spaghetti in a baguette?? Why not have nutella on smoked salmon, then
@@丸い地球-y5l how are those even remotely comparable? Spaghetti and bread is awesome. Its a double carb and both are savoury.
Salmon and Nutella is taking something sweet and adding everyone's least favourite highly pungent protein: fish. Thats more like putting your Spaghetti in vodka.
Dark Helmet: When will then be "NOW" ?
Soon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Came for this
How soon?!
Well go back
Supposedly a sequel is in the works
Yes!!!!
I love videos with deep, engaging concepts like this.
"What time is it?"
"Now or when you asked me?"
I love George Carlin. My hero.
"There is no now."
That bit about time is epic, George was a genius
I can just imagine his reaction on 2020
@@ABadassDragon his head would explode
@@divingwithfriends
There is only NOW!
Time does not exist.
It is a necessary illusion for experiencing this realm.
“Totalitime” sounds like a name Cisco would give to something from the CW Flash
😂😂😂😂 true
Then he gets mad and walks out of the room as some else says, "I'll go talk to him..."
Underrated show
@@alexanderlovellette318 You misspelled overrated*.
@@thegirlwhowaited6316 i love it when every time they get mad first place to go is the hallway.
Another great video, thanks for putting these in more simplified examples!
I just loved the Command And Conquer reference!! I have always felt that the movies that were included in the story lines were greatly underappreciated.
Just like this message is from my present, to your future, reading my past....
Also like how this comment is a reply from my perceived present in response to you comment seen in my present yet still representing your past. Both of these post have entered the past and symbolize a societal interaction through the space time continuum roughly 1 hour apart. Perhaps these are not the only 2 post in the chain right now?
@@thelivingglitch307 responding only for the sake of gratifying the last part of your post.
.ɘmit ni ƨbɿɒwʞɔɒd ϱnivom ,ɘɿυtυʇ ɘʜt moɿʇ ƨi tƨoq ƨiʜT
Kyle, you're keeping me distracted during a very hard time in my life. I'm grateful for your videos.
"Now entering the facility" did i already enter it??? Will I already enter it?
"Now exiting the facility" did i exit already? Am I still in there??
The facility paradox? Idk my brain is fried by this point
7:22 I'm convinced Tim Curry did the whole script in one take without reading it before hand and that line was the absurdity of the whole thing sinking in
I dig your style brother. Keep being you and keep educating people. Thank you for the video
4:38 was the perfect opportunity for a Hitchhiker's Guide reference
I'll take your nerd-card now, sir
Is it a coincidence that 4 plus 38 = 42? Lol
Consider you're observation of "now" as a ping in space: the sooner the response -the more relevant to the present, as the ping travels further in space, it travels further in time and becomes less relevant to the present.
In order to truly capture a moment in time (to an approximate relevance) you would have to simultaneously collect data from multiple points at once (likely quantum tech), save it, send it, and compile it. From there you would have data account for what's happening in all of those spaces at that given moment.
Basis is similar to looking at a mirror in space that is 1 lightyear away. You'll see 2 years in the past. Taking photos of things that are lightyears away results in data that is years old. If you wanna know what their "now" you would need to either be there or perhaps use quantum entanglement tech. Assuming its "entanglement" truly surpasses the speed of light to that degree
Yeah we'd need instant data transfer over large distances to actually measure this. Cool concept though.
The speed of light is also the maximum speed of causality. Nothing can effect anything else faster than light and that includes the transmission of information. Discernible information cannot be sent via entanglement. Even though observation of one particle would cause the wave function of the other to collapse in a perfectly predictable manner, the outcomes would have to be compared to transmit information. How would the two parties observing both entangled particles be able to compare results and communicate their comparison faster than light? That’s the problem
I've always thought that time was a reference of divided sums of our trips around and around the sun (inaccurately) held in place by decay. That time was not the measurement of a distance traveled but about the friends we made along the way.
"I don't have a turtleneck shut up!"
No! You buy a turtleneck, no excuses!
where?
You get an instant like for the Carl Sagan impression!
The voice really was spot on lol
Your extensions are stunning, bro !!
Perhaps only quantum-entangled particles can truly share the same "now"
More important question: "how soon is now?"
When you commented it’s definitely not then lol
Yes.
Go ask The Smiths.
We've never seen now. Now is the future for us. So the question is "when is future"
@@grendy7602 Now! But not anymore
Your production quality is off the charts homie
In the words of that great philosopher, Rick Moranis, “when will then, be now.”
Soon!
You're in now now!
You just missed it.
When?
Just now.
@@Elohist2009 How soon?
Wait, I answered your question which was asked in my past in your future. Damn it.
Well then, when will then be now? But then again, when then is now, what is now if not just then. When you think of it, if then would be now, then now would also be then, which then brings us back to the now-then dilemma.
Roko's Basilisk at 4:14 ?
Do you believe in him now?
Yaaaas!!! A Command and Conquer: Red Alert reference! I love it, Kyle! 😁
If you were looking for the hidden basilisk 4:14
I wasn't, but it found me anyway. I don't feel good about it.
Wait has that been in all of them since the basilisk video?
@@michaelpalmer5995 it always has been
*gunshot*
I don't super appreciate a memetic hazard being shown without consent
You've doomed us all
Sometimes it’s easier to look at it the opposite way, there is no “now,” it’s just the latest ripple in space, time, matter and energy from the Big Bang, where as soon as you’ve consciously observed it, it’s already in a slightly newer state.
"I didn't have a turtleneck... Shut up!"
LMFAO Dude. 👍
😁😂🤣
"Not to get into too much college level physics"
Then you have me just chilling here waiting for classes to start in 3 weeks when I take quantum physics 1.
“I’m gonna call this totalitime”
I think you mean toast-alitime
everyone who remembers After Dark just had that flying toaster song start playing in our heads
First time I've seen one of your videos. Good work, love it.
Zeradin hey I appreciate that, thank you
This is the last place I expected a Red Alert 3 reference. Awesome
"I'm going to the one place that hasn't been corrupted by video game references! .....😐🙂😐😌😐🥴😐😵💫😐 Kyle Hill's TH-cam channel!"
Kyle: "If I were right next to you right now..."
Me: "Please don't watch me poop, Kyle..."
you have your laptop on your lap when you poop?
@@davidjones-vx9ju I watch TH-cam on my phone.
@@joshuahales7551 while you poop?
@@davidjones-vx9ju yup. While I poop.
@@joshuahales7551 0k
My Recommended did me a huge favor! I really love your content. It’s wholesome, entertaining, engaging and intriguing!
"Colonel! Bring me a copy of Spaceballs the Movie!"
-some guy smoking space crack coming up with the Andromeda Paradox
Great stuff. I hope you get as big as VSauce and Veritasium, you deserve it!
Good friends of mine, actually
Awesome video! Thanks guys!
"There's a whole different now, now." ~George Carlin
I can't remember when he said that. But, at some point, he said it now.
My coworkers avoid me whenever I bring this topic up. Something about them being uncomfortable. Idk I think it's pretty cool
Uncomfortable about you or the topic? The topic is pretty tame.
@@GameTimeWhy the topic. Some of my co-workers don't want to think about time as it changes
Dude, people don't want to think about anything in general. Humans are so fed up just with the life itself. Take it easy fellas.
Dude it just to much, to even lay the foundations of the mechanisms of time would take weeks of talking. And there is no baseline standard, only percieved. As conditions can alter standards, i.e. pressure, temp. Its all the spooky boat ride from Willy Wonka. Im exhausted just imagining the complexity.
@@dustinfirkins5736 oh yeah it definitely is a lot to lay out, but it can always keep my brain interested and thinking. I really enjoy that about time.
You know Kyle had a WHOLE loada fun making these videos lol 🙃
Now I know I'm a nerd because I've thought about this on my own too many times to count. Glad I'm not alone.
This reminds me of that one Spaceballs bit.😊
I’ve been thinking a lot about time and it’s purpose and if there’s another way of measuring “time” without using time. This video helps alot
4:38 "Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space. Listen..."
--DNA
I love that that's his initials. Kind of like RNR the painter.
0:34 is that Atlantis from Stargate I see on the second screen from the bottom?
I love the edition on this videos, btw I hardly understand everything but anyways the content it’s always 10/10
"now" does not exist.
it is a frame of reference for extreme near future, based on our 1/10th of a second visual cortex input delay.
Actually, Now is the only time point of reference in time that exists
The real question is, "How soon is now? [Guitar wails...]
Man of culture
There it is!
See, I've already waited too long... and all my hope is gone.
@@Laeiryn *Puts head on the bar...*
I love your transitions
The intro reminds me of space balls "when dose this take place in the movie"
4:14 Did anyone else see that?!
Haha pretty sure it was the basilisk
I didn't see anything. What's the basilisk?
@@TheVitaNerd turn the playback speed down the lowest and go to a second before the time and watch. It's there and def the same represented image of the basilisk, a theory that he covered in a different video.
@@e30ordie I mean, there is a basilisk in the facility, isn't there?
@@e30ordie it really wants to exist, doesn't it?
Kyle is so goofy. I'm a music teacher, but I could see these videos being used as supplemental material for our science instructors.
Hey Kyle can you do a video on the 1:1 moving RX-78-2 Gundam being built for the Japanese Olympics when its being reopened.
Present is always now. It's the past that we see. And future we try to predict.
Oh, you sweet, sweet summer child...
Now is now. We're at now, now. Everything that's happening now, is happening *now*.
Dark Helmet:
What's happening? Where is this in the movie?
Colonel Sandurz:
Now, sir. What's happening, now is happening now.
Dark Helmet:
What happened to then?
Colonel Sandurz:
We passed it.
Dark Helmet:
When?
Colonel Sandurz:
Just now.
Dark Helmet:
Now?
Colonel Sandurz:
Now!
Dark Helmet:
Why?
Colonel Sandurz:
We missed it.
Dark Helmet:
When?
Colonel Sandurz:
Just now.
Dark Helmet:
When will then be now?
Colonel Sandurz:
Soon.
Dark Helmet:
How soon?
Colonel Sandurz:
What?
Dark Helmet:
Where?
Colonel Sandurz:
Good work. Set a course and prepare for our arrival.
Dark Helmet:
When?
Colonel Sandurz:
By tomorrow, they will be our prisoners.
Dark Helmet:
WHO?
Now* entering [THE FACILITY]
Wow so to take a photo of the universe I need to leave the lens cap on my camera! Joking, love your stuff, and as a photographer I do that often.
Kyle: "I didn't have a turtleneck, shut up!"
Me: "Pft, amateur!"
I fuck with my that drawing
You're cute
Hey Kyle! Love the show!
This is something that's perplexed me. If we had the technology to bend space in such a way to communicate to those farther than light has yet traveled, then would it then be possible to be in two places at once? Could you travel to a location where the present you would look and see past you? Could you talk to yourself in two different instances in time? If there's a predetermined future then I think that it would be possible but what if there wasn't? Would it still be possible?
Better yet if you could go faster than light in some way could you talk to your past self by beating the transmission to its destination?
Faster than light travel is a form of time travel, so yes.
I enjoy your paradox and thought experiment videos.
That Tim Curry impression was amazing. I love your hair, too.
"Hark, stationary brethren!"