ECMO CPR (eCPR) (Westmead NSW) - Demo for EVIDENCE Study

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ธ.ค. 2020
  • Westmead specific suggested approach to eCPR for the EVIDENCE study - content is for medical professionals only and will not apply to all settings. Concerns of comments can be flagged with email(s), website at end of video
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @winsi4072
    @winsi4072 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    May I ask, have they ever done Prone CPR simulation based on 2020 Interim CPR Guidelines? Can I request for those doctors and nurses to upload their own simulation videos on how to manage a cardiac arrest Covid-19 patient undergoing Prone Position Ventilation inside the ICU?

  • @uberim
    @uberim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why is the leader not wearing a face mask?

    • @sean2200
      @sean2200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Implying a face mask offers anything other than minimal protection from droplet spread.

  • @andrewrcoggins
    @andrewrcoggins  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At this time masks were optimal.
    I mean really if pt had covid would this be something we d be doing

    • @winsi4072
      @winsi4072 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, doctor. What if a prone ventilated cardiac arrest patient needs Prone CPR, which part of the spine would you do compressions based on 2020 Interim AHA CPR Guidelines?

  • @eiba8322
    @eiba8322 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very hard STOP criteria.

    • @andrewrcoggins
      @andrewrcoggins  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes a little. We’ve pulled them out (time wise) a bit since this video

    • @andrewrcoggins
      @andrewrcoggins  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What do you think of 100 minus age as time guide?

    • @eiba8322
      @eiba8322 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      100 - Age: collaps to ecmo flow? Sounds realistic. We are struggling with no flow time if there is no bystanderCPR. We have seen good outcomes after 10-12min no flow if first detected rhythm is VF. Sometimes it is a clinical decision: some patient look dead even if they have no exclusion criteria, some met exclusion criteria but look "still alive".

    • @andrewrcoggins
      @andrewrcoggins  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eiba8322 that’s right 100 minus age to flow target - completely unvalidated but seems like a ball park based on past outcomes