Cromwell: Hereditary monarchy is evil. English people: Yes! When you’re gone, how will the succession work? Cromwell: I think we’ll go with my son. English people: WTF? Ya, no. Where’s Charles’ kid?
Some of the english: We should make it such everyone has a voice and no one has to go without, that everyone's rights shall be met and no one shall be the victim of somebody's sellfishness. Cromwell: Yeeteth thee into the grave.
To be fair, the problem was that Parliament sucked. They refused to hold new elections, fearing it would cause unrest and threaten their positions. Parliament essentially became as tyrannical and incompetent as the king, so Cromwell took over exclusive control. On his death no-one really knew what to do, so did what they were used to: appoint the son of the previous ruler. When this was an obvious disaster, they called back the king.
Cromwell actually ordered that he wanted no more kings. To create a true Republic. But as the population had only ever known kings and couldn't imagine a world without one they treated him like a king which actually really annoyed Cromwell and he constantly lamented. That's what happens when you have a starving bunch of illiterate peasants for your populace, with the imagination tortured out of them for millennia by brutal monarchs.
@@darrens3 I think it's a bit more complicated than that. I don't know much about the English Civil War/this period, but I know some about institutions. The English institutions had all been built with the a certain format in mind, at which the king was at the top. Take away the king, and you have a power vacuum. Since I don't know much about English institutions, I'll use a large business as an example. So, the CEO is suddenly gone. Who's going to give direction to the CFO, the COO, etc? Who's going to get everyone to work together? Will the front-line cashiers do it? I doubt it; they may not have liked the old CEO, but they're not really in a position (and probably don't have the experience or expertise) to take over the company - regardless of whether they're literate, well-fed, and not-tortured. So, in an institution built on having someone at the top, everyone will keep on looking for someone to give orders until finally the Board of Directors (Parliament?) appoints a new CEO to start giving direction. Fundamentally changing the structure of such a large institution as a big company (or the English government) takes a lot of effort! Again, I don't know this part of history, but did Cromwell institute voting mechanisms, or make other reforms to fundamentally change how the government functions or is constructed? If not, we have a power vacuum - can someone please step up to the plate?
who else remembers the king Charles rap from horrible histories? my name is, my name is, my name is Charles the second. I love the people and the people love me so much that they restored the english monarchy I'm part scottish, french, ittalian, a little bit dame but 100% party animal, champagne?
I don't often see it acknowledged that human rights are invented, but I think that's an important thing in understanding how civil rights truly progress. Thanks for always thinking complexly, John.
I don't know about you but this man and his brother are literally guiding me through the hell that is italian high-school THANKS MUM FOR MAKING ME BILINGUAL, COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT ANY OTHER WAY
I get that you're doing episodes on absolute monarchy right now, but that's even more of a reason to make a video on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, since their model of monarchy is as far from absolute hereditary monarchy as a government can get while still being a monarchy
Yeah! It was a constitutional, parliamentary and elective monarchy that even styled itself as "republic" - _Res publica_ or Rzeczpospolita in Polish, which was a direct translation of the Latin term and although it is conventionally translated to English as "Commonwealth" in this context, modern Polish Republic is also a Rzeczpospolita. :)
@@cathykeller8551 really glad to hear it! I never learned anything about the PLC in high school, which is a shame because it was so unique and interesting among its contemporaries
"England is now a republic, although, not quite like a contemporary republic, since it was ruled by the increasingly dictatorial Oliver Cromwell. Although come to think of it, that does make it some contemporary republics" Nice jab there John
@@Caraxes130 He threatens the Congress or the Supreme Court every time they demonstrate they won't vote in his favor. He threatens opposing Journalists with deportation. Seriously, if you can't see it now, than you'll never see it. Just be glad that it's better to be ignorantly doomed than knowingly so.
Feels thats what this playlist is for. It seems very much based on an American curriculum about European history. Which means it's deeply anglocentric.
What I learn from this video is that John Green is single handily responsible for the Scottish independence movement after calling Scotland England and telling Scots they have the same money as England
I really enjoyed this episode. When I had a layover in London on my trip to study abroad I visited the Banquet Hall, where Charles was kept just before being executed. It is gorgeous.
_Hmmm..._ I hope there's an upcoming video about what happened to Ireland during these times, the Leinster, Munster and Ulster plantations sanctioned by the monarchs Elizabeth, Mary and James. Cromwell's "To hell or to Connacht" and the Battle of the Boyne (mentioned). The Nine Years War from 1594 - 1603 and subsequent Flight of the Earls. _Ahh apologies, John, what I meant to say is that this seems very England-focused, and the spotlight should be given to Wales somewhat._
At least it's not about France or England. That said I sometimes get a feeling the British has no idea there are European countries that aren't on the Atlantic coast.
@jaca van heesch And what it is his job to cater to peoples false assumptions about the term? I would remind you that Europe is so big is centre line passes through Vilnius.
This series seems more like Western European history so far. I understand that English-speaking world does not care much about Central and Eastern Europe but learning something about its history would probably not hurt anybody.
Funny you say that, I've studied quite a bit about the Wars in this period and I was just thinking how irritating it is that recaps like this always give Ireland the short straw.
I kinda wish these went into more details. Like Charles I being offered to head a constitutional monarchy and end the instability or Cromwell trying to relinquish power multiple times, only coming back to stop the parliamentary factions from tearing itself apart.
Fairfax was appointed "Captain General and Commander-in-Chief" of the New Model Army when it was created in 1644 but resigned in 1650 and was replaced by Cromwell. In 1644 Monck was a Royalist held prisoner in the Tower of London, he was released when he agreed to serve in the Parliamentary army sent to Ireland in 1647.
8:14 that quote was inscribed on a plaque on pudding lane... not "the monument", although the monument does say "but popish frenzy, which wrought such horrors, is not yet quenched"
This missed out how the Glorious Revolution led to 1 or 2 events in what was then north-eastern Ireland which are never mentioned or commemorated today. Not ever. Really, everyone's forgotten all about them.
If you take a British Literature class (in college), you know who Aphra Behn is. I say this because I recently took a British Literature class, and Oroonoko was one of the last literature we had to read. The ending was not pretty
Ireland deserved more than an honorable mention considering how England was constantly trying to control them with penal laws, exporting goods, and the oppression of catholics/gaelic culture. The English Civil War definitely affected Ireland more than is mentioned in this video. Can we get a follow up on Ireland specifically? I think the history needs to be shared honestly
Ireland has never been a major power in European politics. It's presumably only because there has been so much emigration to the USA that people think they deserve all this special attention, as opposed to many other small countries that have been dominated by stronger neighbours.
You guys are DEFINITELY the best channel on TH-cam!!! ❤❤❤ I've learned so much from your videos and sincerely appreciate what you are doing for the public as a whole and academia!!! Much love!!!
The English Civil War also saw a rebellion in Scotland as the reason why Charles I called the Long Parliament, as well as a rebellion in Ireland. Also, until about 1649, Sir Thomas Fairfax led the New Model Army, which with Cromwell leading the Cavalry Also, the book on 1688 by Steven Pincus is very good at dispelling the myth that politics was fundamentally linked to religion, showing that Catholics could side with Protestants against other Catholics and so could Protestants when conflicting with other Protestants. Religion is only important to high politics if those involved choose to make it important in their thinking. In lower politics, religion was still powerful, but again not all dominating. James II was greeted very positively by most people in England despite his Catholicism for example, and James II was criticised by the Spanish and even the Pope for following a form of Catholicism that was ‘too French.’ Religion was important but not all dominating
Hi John! Fan from India. I love parsing through most of your videos on world history, europe history and english literature. I wanted to know, do you retain all of these historical events and progressions in your head (or at least the major ones of them) regardless of which video you do, or do you remember only the significant political events and let the rest fall away? Basically- wanted to know if you have all of these (or most of these) facts of history memorized in your head, and if yes, then how! Is a recreational approach to learning history better aimed at trying to cram as many facts/events in your head as possible or just letting whichever major events are memorable stick and allowing the rest to fade away from memory? Thanks for the knowledge!
Cromwell didn't just "crush the Catholics" in Ireland, he committed mass genocide. His actions in Ireland had an impact on the country which can still be felt today.
Locke and Hobbes actually don't differ that much. Hobbes doesn't actually think people are bad, he thinks the world is naturally in a condition that promotes bad human behaviour (ie. scarcity combined with equality). It's that the state of nature is a state of war, not that humans are inherently warlike. Meanwhile, Locke takes an incredibly similar perspective. He distinguishes between the state of nature and the state of war, something permitted by his perception that earth's resources are not scarce, but even so argues that the state of nature naturally decays into the state of war. As a result, Locke argues that the state of society is necessary to limit people's liberties and license. This directly parallels Hobbes' absolutist views, right down to the essential role played by state violence; Locke supports a direct, majoritarian democracy of able bodied adult men on the basis that the side of an issue with more such people has enough might to violently suppress the other side and if the losing side is rational (hah!) they'll admit defeat without the need for overt violence. You also misrepresented the right to property. Locke argues that the right to property is an extension of the right to life. We need stuff to survive (food, clothing, shelter, etc.) and we have a right to more than we need inasmuch as 1) possessing it doesn't deprive others and 2) we don't waste or spoil anything.
4:34 Charles I didn't call on soldiers to arrest the Five Members. He straight up went to Parliament to arrest them himself. Just before he arrived, they were warned of his coming. The House of Commons barricaded the door, only for the King's usher and retinue to break it down (this event is celebrated at the opening of Parliament every year). Charles I commandeered the Speaker's chair and asked if he'd seen the Five Members, remarking "I see that the birds have flown". The Speaker said "I have neither eyes to see nor tongue to speak, except as this House gives me leave". Unable to get an answer from anyone, he left, dissolving Parliament once more.
@CrashCourse It appears that this video is not numbered and it is missing from the European History playlist. I almost missed it as I was using the playlist to catch up on the series :-) Thanks for the great content!
Not all the nobility were Royalists, when the war started the Earls of Essex, Warwick, Northumberland, Bedford, Peterborough, Denbigh, Stamford and Manchester were Parliamentarians along with numerous other Viscounts and Barons.
Yeah, she was portuguese, and the Portuguese empire had traded for quite some time with China and other countries in the Indian and Pacific oceans, which led to their contact with tea.
Well the parliament did become a military dictatorship that committed one of the worst genocides in Europe history against the Irish and as a result made every on in Britain very weary of a republic
Hello Mr. Green. Being a french-canadian, I had learnt in school that the test act was in part adopted to squash Catholic french -canadians and to further inscribe English rule in the newly subdued Canadian territory. Your video seems to possibly contradict that theory. Was there any historical grounds to what I learned or was it simply part of the then sepatist governement's way to further popularise its views?
Hi! If you refer to other states, I think it would be nicer to use the name of that state in that time! So instead of "The Netherlands" you could say the Dutch Republic which is a bit more correct ^^
"Although not quite like a contemporary republic, as it was ruled by the increasingly dictatorial Oliver Cromwell... Although come to think of it that does make it like some contemporary republics." I like what you did there John very sneaky ;) Great video though, such an interesting time in British history!
James VI and I didn't inherit the British crown. He inherited both crowns that covered part of Britain one after the other, but it would be his great-granddaughter who would first have all of Britain as one kingdom.
Hah... once asked a Scotsman where in England he was from.... you can imagine the result. (In my defence, this happened in Norway, he'd apparently been raised in London and didn't have the faintest trace of a Scottish accent, but that was no excuse)
Efficient summary of difficult period but....(1) historians now use War of Three Kingdoms, not 'English Civil War': helps clarify the complex England/Scotland/Ireland picture, Catholic v Protestant, monarchy v republic. Also of interest (2) Glorious Revolution installed the 'Orangemen', still objected to today (3) Charles II's bastards were well looked after, given noble titles (Dukedoms etc) and his ultimate blood descendants included...Diana Princess of Wales....Sarah Ferguson....and Camilla Parker-Bowles
I love how you push your modern personal politics into every single one of these videos. It's not the slightest bit narcissistic, and will never get old.
"Humans are moths that fly towards the light of power" - truer words have never been spoken
Am I the only one who wants to hear the rest of that story about John's misadventure in a Scottish bar?
archvermin, you are not alone
Well he is still alive but maybe his friend didnt make it.
John slipped his running shoes on. "Why?" his friend said, "we can't outrun them.".
"Yes, but I can outrun you.".
True story.
i do why would you u try to regain conversation by saying "well you have the same money"
Scottish people hate the English
Cromwell: Hereditary monarchy is evil.
English people: Yes! When you’re gone, how will the succession work?
Cromwell: I think we’ll go with my son.
English people: WTF? Ya, no. Where’s Charles’ kid?
Some of the english: We should make it such everyone has a voice and no one has to go without, that everyone's rights shall be met and no one shall be the victim of somebody's sellfishness.
Cromwell: Yeeteth thee into the grave.
To be fair, the problem was that Parliament sucked. They refused to hold new elections, fearing it would cause unrest and threaten their positions. Parliament essentially became as tyrannical and incompetent as the king, so Cromwell took over exclusive control. On his death no-one really knew what to do, so did what they were used to: appoint the son of the previous ruler. When this was an obvious disaster, they called back the king.
@@psammiad Well, ya, but that would not have made for a good meme.
Cromwell actually ordered that he wanted no more kings. To create a true Republic. But as the population had only ever known kings and couldn't imagine a world without one they treated him like a king which actually really annoyed Cromwell and he constantly lamented. That's what happens when you have a starving bunch of illiterate peasants for your populace, with the imagination tortured out of them for millennia by brutal monarchs.
@@darrens3 I think it's a bit more complicated than that. I don't know much about the English Civil War/this period, but I know some about institutions.
The English institutions had all been built with the a certain format in mind, at which the king was at the top. Take away the king, and you have a power vacuum.
Since I don't know much about English institutions, I'll use a large business as an example. So, the CEO is suddenly gone. Who's going to give direction to the CFO, the COO, etc? Who's going to get everyone to work together? Will the front-line cashiers do it? I doubt it; they may not have liked the old CEO, but they're not really in a position (and probably don't have the experience or expertise) to take over the company - regardless of whether they're literate, well-fed, and not-tortured. So, in an institution built on having someone at the top, everyone will keep on looking for someone to give orders until finally the Board of Directors (Parliament?) appoints a new CEO to start giving direction.
Fundamentally changing the structure of such a large institution as a big company (or the English government) takes a lot of effort! Again, I don't know this part of history, but did Cromwell institute voting mechanisms, or make other reforms to fundamentally change how the government functions or is constructed? If not, we have a power vacuum - can someone please step up to the plate?
who else remembers the king Charles rap from horrible histories?
my name is, my name is, my name is Charles the second.
I love the people and the people love me
so much that they restored the english monarchy
I'm part scottish, french, ittalian, a little bit dame
but 100% party animal, champagne?
I don't often see it acknowledged that human rights are invented, but I think that's an important thing in understanding how civil rights truly progress.
Thanks for always thinking complexly, John.
I don't know about you but this man and his brother are literally guiding me through the hell that is italian high-school THANKS MUM FOR MAKING ME BILINGUAL, COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT ANY OTHER WAY
I get that you're doing episodes on absolute monarchy right now, but that's even more of a reason to make a video on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, since their model of monarchy is as far from absolute hereditary monarchy as a government can get while still being a monarchy
Yeah! It was a constitutional, parliamentary and elective monarchy that even styled itself as "republic" - _Res publica_ or Rzeczpospolita in Polish, which was a direct translation of the Latin term and although it is conventionally translated to English as "Commonwealth" in this context, modern Polish Republic is also a Rzeczpospolita. :)
Stay tuned! Poland-Lithuania will be in episode 16
Artur M. That’s actually really amazing. Why haven’t we learned about it more in European history?
@@cathykeller8551 really glad to hear it! I never learned anything about the PLC in high school, which is a shame because it was so unique and interesting among its contemporaries
oh!you mean The Boyar Democracy?
Cromwell, perhaps the most despised man in Ireland.
Vathek How about Robert Peel?
@@robertjarman3703 committing genocide is far worse than doing nothing
The Irish deserved it, tbh.
@@mikeoxsmal8022 the irish did
@@takod323 No the irish never committed genocide
9:40 This is the greatest way of saying "Boom headshot!" that I have ever heard.
"England is now a republic, although, not quite like a contemporary republic, since it was ruled by the increasingly dictatorial Oliver Cromwell. Although come to think of it, that does make it some contemporary republics" Nice jab there John
As a Brazilian this quote hit right home.
Fatema Zohra
Turks would feel it too, and depending on who you ask....americans....
@@Edubububu not liking a president doesn't make him a dictator.
@@Caraxes130 He threatens the Congress or the Supreme Court every time they demonstrate they won't vote in his favor. He threatens opposing Journalists with deportation. Seriously, if you can't see it now, than you'll never see it. Just be glad that it's better to be ignorantly doomed than knowingly so.
@@Edubububu vc realmente acredita nas coisas q vc escreve ou vc pelo menos tem noção de que tá mentindo?
Obligatory "who here just likes to watch these videos and isn't studying for a test?" Comment
Yep
Me
Feels thats what this playlist is for. It seems very much based on an American curriculum about European history. Which means it's deeply anglocentric.
I'm watching so I'll have something in common with Jaden Smith
I do.
What I learn from this video is that John Green is single handily responsible for the Scottish independence movement after calling Scotland England and telling Scots they have the same money as England
"english civil war" which one?
The song of the clash probably...
The other big one
The Revolution!!
The one that's not a dynastic dispute.
1642 to 1649
Lol as a Scot, I'm in stitches at his experience in a Scottish bar.
I really enjoyed this episode.
When I had a layover in London on my trip to study abroad I visited the Banquet Hall, where Charles was kept just before being executed.
It is gorgeous.
Hearing that next week's episode will talk about Dutch cannibalism makes me hope we get a good Double Dutch joke out of it.
I only wish I could tell you guys how much this channel has done for me.
_Hmmm..._ I hope there's an upcoming video about what happened to Ireland during these times, the Leinster, Munster and Ulster plantations sanctioned by the monarchs Elizabeth, Mary and James. Cromwell's "To hell or to Connacht" and the Battle of the Boyne (mentioned). The Nine Years War from 1594 - 1603 and subsequent Flight of the Earls.
_Ahh apologies, John, what I meant to say is that this seems very England-focused, and the spotlight should be given to Wales somewhat._
Excited for Dutch Golden Age!
Zeg makker
Ah, golden age they said.
At least it's not about France or England. That said I sometimes get a feeling the British has no idea there are European countries that aren't on the Atlantic coast.
@jaca van heesch And what it is his job to cater to peoples false assumptions about the term? I would remind you that Europe is so big is centre line passes through Vilnius.
This series seems more like Western European history so far. I understand that English-speaking world does not care much about Central and Eastern Europe but learning something about its history would probably not hurt anybody.
LakyStar completely agree
I guess the east comes when it becomes part of the west.
East and west is an arbitrary and nonsensical dividing line to begin with - and it has mostly seen use for political purposes against either.
Funny you say that, I've studied quite a bit about the Wars in this period and I was just thinking how irritating it is that recaps like this always give Ireland the short straw.
Wasn't there a whole episode on the 30 years war?
lol i also love the reference to calvin and hobbes. i love watterson's discription of hobbes: a dim view of human nature.
I kinda wish these went into more details. Like Charles I being offered to head a constitutional monarchy and end the instability or Cromwell trying to relinquish power multiple times, only coming back to stop the parliamentary factions from tearing itself apart.
4:55 The New Model Army was led by George Monck and Thomas Fairfax, *not* Cromwell. Cromwell was a prominent commander at the time.
Was about to come here to say this
Fairfax was appointed "Captain General and Commander-in-Chief" of the New Model Army when it was created in 1644 but resigned in 1650 and was replaced by Cromwell.
In 1644 Monck was a Royalist held prisoner in the Tower of London, he was released when he agreed to serve in the Parliamentary army sent to Ireland in 1647.
I'm English and ought to know this stuff, but I found it very helpful. Thank you!
thank you for what you do John, sincerely.
you make the world better, sincerely.
Thank u so much for including women and their situation in those years. U are amazing john! Xx
I love the art and animation style of the cartoons!
I’ve been watching this channel for years. It’s crazy to see how much things change.
8:14 that quote was inscribed on a plaque on pudding lane... not "the monument", although the monument does say "but popish frenzy, which wrought such horrors, is not yet quenched"
This missed out how the Glorious Revolution led to 1 or 2 events in what was then north-eastern Ireland which are never mentioned or commemorated today. Not ever. Really, everyone's forgotten all about them.
If you take a British Literature class (in college), you know who Aphra Behn is. I say this because I recently took a British Literature class, and Oroonoko was one of the last literature we had to read. The ending was not pretty
Oh man im glad to see little spark on john's face today..he looks happier compared with previous episode
Play on x1.25 speed for that classic crash course feel
Thanx😄 that helps
So true
You've found the Golden rate OF IDK LOL. THANK YOU 😊!!!!
Great episode. Nice to see you again. Your awesome
Thanks for teaching! I just LOVE these lessons!!!! Cheers, from Brazil!
Incredible work this episode CrashCourse!
Ireland deserved more than an honorable mention considering how England was constantly trying to control them with penal laws, exporting goods, and the oppression of catholics/gaelic culture. The English Civil War definitely affected Ireland more than is mentioned in this video. Can we get a follow up on Ireland specifically? I think the history needs to be shared honestly
I agree. One of the few things that annoys me about this series is that it seems to focus on a very specific handful of European nations
They announced the series by making a wider word history series so southern /western Europe might be featured in that more prominently.
@@vigilantsycamore8750 get the big players, in and out the way, then diversify.
Remember the first focused history series was just on the US itself.
Ireland has never been a major power in European politics. It's presumably only because there has been so much emigration to the USA that people think they deserve all this special attention, as opposed to many other small countries that have been dominated by stronger neighbours.
@@mankytoes well ireland did have lots of influence in the post roman europe with the schcottenkloistern .
I love how the cartoon characters nod their head it’s so cute
THE ONE I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR: THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR
You guys are DEFINITELY the best channel on TH-cam!!! ❤❤❤ I've learned so much from your videos and sincerely appreciate what you are doing for the public as a whole and academia!!! Much love!!!
Amazing video, thank you so much for such a concise and informative history video. Very much appreciated!!
1:15 Try to say "how much you are loving Spain" when you visit Catalonia for a similar experience.
The English Civil War also saw a rebellion in Scotland as the reason why Charles I called the Long Parliament, as well as a rebellion in Ireland. Also, until about 1649, Sir Thomas Fairfax led the New Model Army, which with Cromwell leading the Cavalry
Also, the book on 1688 by Steven Pincus is very good at dispelling the myth that politics was fundamentally linked to religion, showing that Catholics could side with Protestants against other Catholics and so could Protestants when conflicting with other Protestants. Religion is only important to high politics if those involved choose to make it important in their thinking. In lower politics, religion was still powerful, but again not all dominating. James II was greeted very positively by most people in England despite his Catholicism for example, and James II was criticised by the Spanish and even the Pope for following a form of Catholicism that was ‘too French.’ Religion was important but not all dominating
Hi John!
Fan from India. I love parsing through most of your videos on world history, europe history and english literature. I wanted to know, do you retain all of these historical events and progressions in your head (or at least the major ones of them) regardless of which video you do, or do you remember only the significant political events and let the rest fall away? Basically- wanted to know if you have all of these (or most of these) facts of history memorized in your head, and if yes, then how! Is a recreational approach to learning history better aimed at trying to cram as many facts/events in your head as possible or just letting whichever major events are memorable stick and allowing the rest to fade away from memory?
Thanks for the knowledge!
Cromwell didn't just "crush the Catholics" in Ireland, he committed mass genocide. His actions in Ireland had an impact on the country which can still be felt today.
Locke and Hobbes actually don't differ that much. Hobbes doesn't actually think people are bad, he thinks the world is naturally in a condition that promotes bad human behaviour (ie. scarcity combined with equality). It's that the state of nature is a state of war, not that humans are inherently warlike. Meanwhile, Locke takes an incredibly similar perspective. He distinguishes between the state of nature and the state of war, something permitted by his perception that earth's resources are not scarce, but even so argues that the state of nature naturally decays into the state of war. As a result, Locke argues that the state of society is necessary to limit people's liberties and license. This directly parallels Hobbes' absolutist views, right down to the essential role played by state violence; Locke supports a direct, majoritarian democracy of able bodied adult men on the basis that the side of an issue with more such people has enough might to violently suppress the other side and if the losing side is rational (hah!) they'll admit defeat without the need for overt violence.
You also misrepresented the right to property. Locke argues that the right to property is an extension of the right to life. We need stuff to survive (food, clothing, shelter, etc.) and we have a right to more than we need inasmuch as 1) possessing it doesn't deprive others and 2) we don't waste or spoil anything.
Some pretty resounding messages in this one
Stuart Rise, Fall, and Restoration @ 0:49
Restoration to Glorious Revolution @ 7:11
Imagine having a King
This post was made by Roundhead Gang
Please add this to the European History playlist for binge purposes...
4:34 Charles I didn't call on soldiers to arrest the Five Members. He straight up went to Parliament to arrest them himself. Just before he arrived, they were warned of his coming. The House of Commons barricaded the door, only for the King's usher and retinue to break it down (this event is celebrated at the opening of Parliament every year). Charles I commandeered the Speaker's chair and asked if he'd seen the Five Members, remarking "I see that the birds have flown". The Speaker said "I have neither eyes to see nor tongue to speak, except as this House gives me leave". Unable to get an answer from anyone, he left, dissolving Parliament once more.
The new model army was not led by Cromwell it was led by Thomas Fairfax
Is that hank standing beside him in Scotland looking SUPER worried in the thought bubble? 😂
@CrashCourse It appears that this video is not numbered and it is missing from the European History playlist. I almost missed it as I was using the playlist to catch up on the series :-) Thanks for the great content!
++
This series is awesome. Thanks to Crash Course and specially to the presenter.
You changed my life. Thank you
Samuel Pepys wrote well his obs'rvations of this time of beshrew and fires, viz. his dairies.
LOVING the Jamestown reference here!
Finally you talked about England
Just a note - Cavaliers are usually referred to as royalists and roundheads as parliamentarians.
Not all the nobility were Royalists, when the war started the Earls of Essex, Warwick, Northumberland, Bedford, Peterborough, Denbigh, Stamford and Manchester were Parliamentarians along with numerous other Viscounts and Barons.
It is said that charles ii wife introduced tea to england
Yeah, she was portuguese, and the Portuguese empire had traded for quite some time with China and other countries in the Indian and Pacific oceans, which led to their contact with tea.
She also brought land in India as part of her dowry
@@jvsl1999 i know. Eu sou portugues (i am portugueze). I just wanted to highlight this story
@@JimBob4233 Yes. She gave city of Mumbai to Charles II.
Tea was always English. Wandering Stone Age druids introduced it to the Chinese in the 4th millennium BC ;)
You forgot one incident, in 1688 British parliament ceased the power of Monarchy and you also didn't mention about Wolf Tone
Wolf Tone was 100 years later
this video is missing from your european history playlist.
I think you called Rousseau Locke when introducing the segment with the two portraits comparing Hobbes and Rousseau (11:58).
“Refusing to call parliament, felt like an absolutist move” sounds like Boris and proroguing Parliament..
Well the parliament did become a military dictatorship that committed one of the worst genocides in Europe history against the Irish and as a result made every on in Britain very weary of a republic
Richard Johnson So?
The basic issues are the same
Richard Johnson the question now is about where power lies: with either the executive, legislative or the people
Same fundamental issue
6:49 well, I guess we can finally declare that CrashCourse has sunk to that historian's cardinal sin, Wig historiography! ;)
This is what I’m learning right now.
Thomas Hobbes: *China* (Dictatorship)
John Locke: *America* (Democracy)
I get you, but America wasn't much of a democracy for minorities for a very long part of its history either.
Thanks for the video!
I love your upload! 👍
Will you make an episode about polish parliamentarism? This is something worth mentioning :)
Who else wants crash course middle east history
You should be on PBS!
Farewell the jeweled crown, farewell the velvet gown, watch it all come tumbling down, goodbye to the crown~
parliamentarian gang
The og Gucci gang with their wigs.
Eloquin- That's interesting, what is it from?
pantslizard farewell to the crown by chumbawamba (the band that did the I get knocked down song)
Creative Zaara- chumbawamba? Ok, cool. (haven't heard of them in years) Thanx
Hello Mr. Green. Being a french-canadian, I had learnt in school that the test act was in part adopted to squash Catholic french -canadians and to further inscribe English rule in the newly subdued Canadian territory. Your video seems to possibly contradict that theory. Was there any historical grounds to what I learned or was it simply part of the then sepatist governement's way to further popularise its views?
I love this stuff!! ❤
Tell us more about the pub mishap.
if you watch this guys old videos he sounded so enthusiastic and always talked so fast, this video is so weird since he seems so monotone
wow john remember 2013 videos where you used to be happy and enthusiastic looks like everyone has grown old :(
Hi, this is Crash Course West European History
Best yet!
Hi! If you refer to other states, I think it would be nicer to use the name of that state in that time! So instead of "The Netherlands" you could say the Dutch Republic which is a bit more correct ^^
"Although not quite like a contemporary republic, as it was ruled by the increasingly dictatorial Oliver Cromwell... Although come to think of it that does make it like some contemporary republics." I like what you did there John very sneaky ;) Great video though, such an interesting time in British history!
James VI and I didn't inherit the British crown. He inherited both crowns that covered part of Britain one after the other, but it would be his great-granddaughter who would first have all of Britain as one kingdom.
I love the people and the people love me so much that they restored the English monarchy
I like the bar storry
The truest truth that John Green ever learned = Scotland ain’t England
Hah... once asked a Scotsman where in England he was from.... you can imagine the result. (In my defence, this happened in Norway, he'd apparently been raised in London and didn't have the faintest trace of a Scottish accent, but that was no excuse)
It's funny I'm actually watching more crashcourse than i did in school 😂😂
Amazing and best video
Ended for good? There were at least 2 Jacobite uprisings to put the Stuart successor (or pretender, if you like) back on the throne.
No talk of the levellers or diggers?
Ceash Course Astrology please! ✨🤩
Not calling parlement back together? Hmm, now where have I seen this recently?
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all of it 14:30
Efficient summary of difficult period but....(1) historians now use War of Three Kingdoms, not 'English Civil War': helps clarify the complex England/Scotland/Ireland picture, Catholic v Protestant, monarchy v republic. Also of interest (2) Glorious Revolution installed the 'Orangemen', still objected to today (3) Charles II's bastards were well looked after, given noble titles (Dukedoms etc) and his ultimate blood descendants included...Diana Princess of Wales....Sarah Ferguson....and Camilla Parker-Bowles
Here and I was so sure the Glorious Revolution referred to the ascension of the House of Orange.
William III of England was William of Orange.
I love how you push your modern personal politics into every single one of these videos. It's not the slightest bit narcissistic, and will never get old.
HEY! THIS CLIP IS NOT IN THE PLAYLIST, PLS REMEDY ASAP.
All caps, of course. It's needed ti draw attention. This is an important issue!