The following are the writings of Freud from which Solms structures this lecture: On Narcissism: An introduction (1914) Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning (1911) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921, this one not so sure but the part about ego ideal, ideal of the ego is here) The Ego and the Id (1923) Instincts and Their Vicissitudes (1915) Repression (1915) The Unconscious (1915) Also a lot of these texts are sumarized in An Outline of Psychoanalysis (1938) Not so sure which of Kleins writings is he basing on but a lot of what he talks about is on "Envy and gratitude & other works, 1946-1963"
I don't understand the expression around 0:55-56. "There's a (...) between ego and id, between ego and superego." It sounds like "rent" but that can't be right?
These two lectures are so brilliantly accessible and important!
Very good, thanks
Dr. Solms is a precious source of understanding of the brain and mind. 🍾
The following are the writings of Freud from which Solms structures this lecture:
On Narcissism: An introduction (1914)
Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning (1911)
Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921, this one not so sure but the part about ego ideal, ideal of the ego is here)
The Ego and the Id (1923)
Instincts and Their Vicissitudes (1915)
Repression (1915)
The Unconscious (1915)
Also a lot of these texts are sumarized in An Outline of Psychoanalysis (1938)
Not so sure which of Kleins writings is he basing on but a lot of what he talks about is on "Envy and gratitude & other works, 1946-1963"
Thank you for uploading
Thank you for sharing this
Excelente
TIA, not TBI
Does Prof. Solms somewhere go over the same range of material, in the same detail, but from the viewpoint of the "conscious Id" concept?
Did you find anything re: this?
I don't understand the expression around 0:55-56. "There's a (...) between ego and id, between ego and superego." It sounds like "rent" but that can't be right?
rent - verb, to tear with violent force
@@jamescronan7220 thanks. Didn't know this expression.
@@jamescronan7220 Excellent