John Company 2nd Edition: 1758 Solo - PART 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @christianvansomeren3760
    @christianvansomeren3760 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is such a fun solo game, well done on designing it! And another great playthrough, so fun to watch!

  • @Versehen
    @Versehen 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wish there is more solo content for John company 😢

  • @demo4444
    @demo4444 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This game is just fantastic

  • @dtelquess
    @dtelquess ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ah, the next installment cometh.

  • @manuelmay768
    @manuelmay768 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One Question, at around Minute 28 the Company had 37Pounds in the coffers. Shouldn´t you remove 5 Pounds due to Callico Acts ?

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, absolutely; on turn 1 we hadn't yet passed Deregulation, so the Company must pay the penalty. Good spot ! R.R.

  • @MichaelNorrish
    @MichaelNorrish ปีที่แล้ว

    33:02 “If the region pictured on the top of the draw stack is sovereign, add a
    tower level to it. Otherwise, treat this event as a Rebellion in the pictured
    region”. Your leader event should be affecting the region at the top of the stack, not Bengal.

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly right. I don’t know why I said Bengal was on top of the stack… it was until I drew it! 😂Good spot 👍👍

  • @der.Schtefan
    @der.Schtefan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I binge watched all of your JC videos. Amazing. Btw, if you send your audio through an AI podcast enhancer, it sounds like recorded with a studio mic. I downloaded your videos, sent them through Adobe podcast (free online tool), and combined them again for watching. (I made sure to run the video in the background for the views and liked them). Just some food for thought, as a non native speaker it was hard for me to follow otherwise.

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      great tip. I'm using iMovie inherent voice enhancer, but it still ain't great

  • @LeTerrorist88
    @LeTerrorist88 ปีที่แล้ว

    During the first Family phase, is it correct that the Crown buys a workshop using the extra action, even though her climate was set to stag? I took the meaning of the rules to mean that the Crown only uses an extra action when the action in question is listed as one of the actions she wants to take, depending on her climate.

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      she will. She will use the extra action as her standard action if it is an action should have taken anyway. for example, if her climate says she would take a shipyard and the free extra action is a shipyard, then she will take the shipyard as a free action and then do the next two actions, so she ends up taking 3 actions from her menu. Hopefully that makes sense? otherwise she will take the shipyard last as an action extra to her normal 2.

  • @warlord76i
    @warlord76i ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent as always. Though I would have a question. When u choose the law u consider ( player asset - crown asset) where -1 its better than -2 and so on. (that means that positive nr is even better..m I right?) and multiplay it by -1 when its tax..so in you case you had 0-6 or so, with ships and 0-4 in luxuries resulting in -6 and -4 multiplied by-1 the result is 4 and 6 where 6 is better, so according to the rule, the crown should had been choosen 6 been tax on ships ? or my logic is wrong?

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Istvan,
      it's the other way around: so it is Crown Assets minus Player Assets; and then multiply by -1 if it is a Tax. So, if it is a Bonus, and Crown value is higher, then Crown will benefit more; if it is a Tax, and Crown value is lower, then Crown will benefit more.
      Ricky.

  • @thorozar3662
    @thorozar3662 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    40:40 doesnt the crown have 2 windows from their luxury cards to require them to pay 2 pounds in tax during the upkeep stage? Not a big deal in the solo game since you cant bleed them dry and start losing stuff but nonetheless a tax is required.
    43:00 the crown should have thrown in their 4 pounds to vote against deregulation. Unless there was an update to the rules the crown always votes first, and were voting against.

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hi . Thanks for your questions: no , there is no tax applied during the Upkeep phase. Taxes are normally a result of a passed law with a Tax policy. Re deregulation: the Crown always votes last and against, and will only spend the money if it moves the vote to a failing position. Hope this helps! Ricky

    • @thorozar3662
      @thorozar3662 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @BoxofDelights sorry tax was the wrong phrase. They have 2 windows on their luxury cards, so during upkeep don't they pay a pound per window?

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No, there is no cost on windows during Upkeep. In the Upkeep phase everyone must pay for their family members on prizes - that's it ! Hope this helps - best wishes, Ricky.

  • @dereksimmons5877
    @dereksimmons5877 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the DoT or the tiebreaker clarification the only changes? I don't see them on the Errata document and I'm worried now I've missed other tweaks. I wouldn't want to go easy on myself :p

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว

      Which errata doc are you referring to? There are only two changes on the errata: the DoT one and one on Manager of Shipping, but the DoT one is likely too recent to be on the 2nd printing, so will remain an errata item for now.

    • @dereksimmons5877
      @dereksimmons5877 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BoxofDelights docs.google.com/document/d/1hvtkMaKiyhENYW7SWNoBdGQkL-FCcSFkOycgTlaGris/edit
      I see the one about fitting ships, and I've already made that change in my handbook, but this is the first I'm seeing about the DoT one. I'm asking specifically because I've found pumping the Crown DoT a little too consistently viable.

  • @TheNickman007
    @TheNickman007 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shouldn't the rebellion about the 30min mark in Bengal been in Hyderabad rather than Bengal? Leader card should be top of the stack rather than where the elephant is, yeah?

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes, exactly right. I was still focused on the card that was on top of the deck before I flipped it (Bengal), so Bengal was stuck in my head; but you are spot on: it should have been Hyderabad.

    • @TheNickman007
      @TheNickman007 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BoxofDelights it’s all good, mate, it’s such a complicated game. I’ve played dozens of solo games and I still miss things all the time, little steps here and there. Sometimes I can retroactively go back and fix them once I realise, sometimes I can’t.
      I have another question for you… how do you interpret the “Fitted Ships” AI card? That one’s always confused me somewhat. Is it total fitted ships, including firms? Or just company fitted ships? I assume ships still on shipyards don’t count as they’re not fitted yet, and neither do extra or company ships, as they’re “leased” and “bought” (and in hindsight, extra ships are never out at this stage of the round).

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheNickman007 it's all ships in a sea zone; it is a bit of a puzzle to get the definition, but if you check the Manager of Shipping card, you can see that all types of ships are referred to as "fitted" once they are up in a sea zone. In hindsight, I might have been better to have written it as "number of ships in all sea zones".

    • @TheNickman007
      @TheNickman007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BoxofDelights ok cool, so it DOES count firm ships? I have always played it as such, as they’re fitted ships

  • @ekted
    @ekted ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't see your "updates" to the Special Envoy anywhere on BGG. Did this change not end up being official?

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the updates are not on bgg. there is a Google doc on the Wehrlegig discord server.

    • @ekted
      @ekted ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BoxofDelights I looked at that document. It doesn't mention any changes to the cost of the Special Envoy. It doesn't even list page 6 as having any changes at all.

    • @BoxofDelights
      @BoxofDelights  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ekted I added a post to BGG, copying the Errata from the document into this thread: boardgamegeek.com/thread/2936700/article/41627121#41627121