For those of us who never had a father to run to, that was powerful imagery and so true, let us rely on Jesus and cling to His leg for Wisdom, guidance and protection in all things Amen
Your knowledge that Father God and Jesus through the Holy Spirit has blessed you with. Your endeavor to share the gospel of Jesus is commendable and I praise our Jesus for your service. Yet I'm totally shocked at your depth of the false pretrib midtrib or prewrath rapture doctrines??? The constant false definitions are appalling. 1. One event of Jesus returning ?? Not 2 or 3 matt24: 29-31 2. 2 events of the resurrections. One for the dead righteous into eternal life and the other is the condemned to eternal contempt DANIEL 12:2 3. One event of the gathering together all the righteous. With the living being caught up or harpazo or rapture. Not 2 or 3 1thess4: 13-17 4. 1thess4: 13-17 tells us the resurrection of the dead righteous actually happens FIRST BEFORE the catching up or rapture. And the FIRST resurrection of the dead righteous according to Rev20 : 4-6 includes martyrs of the tribulation refusing the mark of the beast making the resurrection of the dead righteous POSTTRIB making the catching up or rapture also POSTTRIB!! False definitions totally ignore the foundational truths of the scriptures. There is too much twisting, adding to and subtracting from scripture with false definitions that are all easily debunked. #1 false definition "The first resurrection of Rev20: 4-6 doesn't really mean The FIRST resurrection" ???? WARNING Rev22: 18,19.
@jeffnbarbiemiller I was listing the false definition!!! Not the facts. The fact is it is the first resurrection of the dead righteous the second resurrection is the condemned rev20: 4-15. Only one resurrection of the dead righteous and one resurrection of the condemned. Daniel12:2. The false definition is when "they" say " the first isn't really the first??? Your saying the last which is technically true because there is only one resurrection of the dead righteous and it is the FIRST and the last of the dead righteous yet the resurrection of the condemned is the 2nd resurrection listed in rev20: 4-15 One could say the resurrection of the condemned is the first and last resurrection of the condemned. There is only 2 resurrections Daniel12: 2 the First is the dead righteous into eternal life rev20: 4-6 the 2nd resurrection is the condemned into eternal contempt ( lake of fire) rev20: 12-15. There are not 2 or 3 resurrections of the dead righteous ONLY 1.
For those of us who never had a father to run to, that was powerful imagery and so true, let us rely on Jesus and cling to His leg for Wisdom, guidance and protection in all things Amen
Thank you so much for all your teaching of GODS word I appreciate it so much GOD bless you y’all ❤❤❤
GOD. JE CH .
Amen!
Your knowledge that Father God and Jesus through the Holy Spirit has blessed you with. Your endeavor to share the gospel of Jesus is commendable and I praise our Jesus for your service.
Yet I'm totally shocked at your depth of the false pretrib midtrib or prewrath rapture doctrines??? The constant false definitions are appalling.
1. One event of Jesus returning ??
Not 2 or 3 matt24: 29-31
2. 2 events of the resurrections. One for the dead righteous into eternal life and the other is the condemned to eternal contempt
DANIEL 12:2
3. One event of the gathering together all the righteous. With the living being caught up or harpazo or rapture. Not 2 or 3 1thess4: 13-17
4. 1thess4: 13-17 tells us the resurrection of the dead righteous actually happens FIRST BEFORE the catching up or rapture. And the FIRST resurrection of the dead righteous according to Rev20 : 4-6 includes martyrs of the tribulation refusing the mark of the beast making the resurrection of the dead righteous POSTTRIB making the catching up or rapture also POSTTRIB!!
False definitions totally ignore the foundational truths of the scriptures. There is too much twisting, adding to and subtracting from scripture with false definitions that are all easily debunked.
#1 false definition "The first resurrection of Rev20: 4-6 doesn't really mean The FIRST resurrection" ???? WARNING Rev22: 18,19.
Amen... It's the last
@jeffnbarbiemiller I was listing the false definition!!! Not the facts. The fact is it is the first resurrection of the dead righteous the second resurrection is the condemned rev20: 4-15.
Only one resurrection of the dead righteous and one resurrection of the condemned. Daniel12:2. The false definition is when "they" say " the first isn't really the first??? Your saying the last which is technically true because there is only one resurrection of the dead righteous and it is the FIRST and the last of the dead righteous yet the resurrection of the condemned is the 2nd resurrection listed in rev20: 4-15
One could say the resurrection of the condemned is the first and last resurrection of the condemned. There is only 2 resurrections Daniel12: 2 the First is the dead righteous into eternal life rev20: 4-6 the 2nd resurrection is the condemned into eternal contempt ( lake of fire) rev20: 12-15. There are not 2 or 3 resurrections of the dead righteous ONLY 1.