Deist Destroyed By Atheist Presuppositional Apologetics
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Fatfish here was making crazy claims and being really rude. I was just sitting there minding my own business playing 7 days to die and I linked him the video that explains why theists ask how everything comes from nothing after he had said that. He said it AGAIN so I exited 7 days to die and destroyed his worldview.
Join us at discord.gg/politics for more great discussions!
Please like, comment, share, and subscribe for more amazing videos!
this is too funny.
Thank you!
Special theory of revelation was created by Alfred Einstein
LOL
I was like "WTF is atheist presuppositional apologetics" 😂
A new method of apologetics
That's the only reason I clicked XD
@@Goldenrod6901 LOL. Well thank you for watching!
@@realBreakfasttacos just the thought of it makes me cringe, but I'll check out your other videos to see where this goes
apologetics can be applied to any topic right now there is a lot of genocide apologetics going on .
Taco please don't let the two nose angels get me.
LOL
It is my `suspicion` that something has indeed always existed. Probably a lot more than we're aware. However, I don't need to know, or even have a belief in the origin of being, if there even `is` an origin of being, to see that god concepts are an arbitrary and inexplicable explanation, that has no tether to anything we understand about reality. No, that doesn't make it impossible. That would be an argument from incredulity, however it certainly does not make it a reasonable probability either. Starting with an answer and looking for something to apply it to, is not a rational way to understand the existence we are a part of. I would argue that any epistemology that starts with a god concept as a philosophical axiom, is irrational.
My thought is that energy has always existed.
@@realBreakfasttacos That's the most reasonable likelihood imo as well, based on what we observe.
@@somersetcace1 Yup
Blessed Bowel movement is this bashing on Darth XD it has all of his red flag tick marks all over this conversation
LOL. It is a new method of atheistic apologetics focused on elucidating to the interlocutor the natural and special revelations that they have already received but have been rejecting in their unrighteousness.
Welcome to athiesm my brother!
True
"They knew in the SEVENTIES that atheists don't believe that shit!" Lol I'm dying.
LOL
Certified hood classic
Aww how kind.
That greatest tragedy of hell is the fact you don't have to go.
There aren't any works we must perform for salvation, it was all taken care of at the cross and is offered as a free gift. Romans 4:5, "And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness,"
Romans 1:16 tells us, "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek."
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 tells us exactly what this Gospel is, "Now, brothers and sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,"
All the breaking of God's laws and evil things you and I have ever done (past, present and future) has already been paid for. It won't do any good though if you don't accept the payment. Why not take the free gift of eternal life? :)
The self evident truth of our shared naturalistic/atheistic reality has been revealed to all of sound mind through both natural and special revelation in an undeniable way. You are simply rejecting the truth in your unrighteousness because you want sin and evil to exist outside of a conceptual nature.
@@realBreakfasttacos Thanks for the reply. May I ask what evidence led you to this conclusion? :)
You really think you make sense, don't you, lol.
Just throwing minds in there like, yeah bro, nothing to see here, move along. All the material of a brain exists on after the conscious is no longer there....
I would never grant to you that you have a mind in conversation. I was just engaging in good faith with him because he was a deist.
Are you a theist?
@@Altitudes He is a theist troll, and very bad at apologetics.
@@Julian0101 Then I would want to know how he accounts for knowledge on a worldview in which God can change the parameters at any time.
@@Altitudes Oh, that would be an interesting question. I wonder if he has the baIIs to answer it.
Forrest Valkai and his friends on AnswersInAtheism are chickening out of debating me. I just opened up the challenge on Then Modern Day Debate Discord Server for other challengers. The headline and current proposed resolution is "Can you be an atheist and say gods exists in any context?". You may be able to hold your own @breakfesttacos.
I'm not a fan of MDD, sorry.
@@realBreakfasttacos I understand that. The plan is to relocate the debate as soon as I find someone who would at least be willing to debate it without the need to hold onto moderation powers like on Atheist Talk Shows like The Line.
Forrest Valkai is willing to clown someone who doesn't understand hermeneutics for the better part of an hour, but when someone likes me pulls him off of the naytheism island of stability, he is angry and frustrated and wants the call to end, and that goes 5X for the AnswersInAtheism panel.
Only in your delusinal Dreans , my little Pidgeon Chess Champion
@@manopapadopoulos6043 It should be an easy win for you then.
@@oflameo8927 You failed to understand how his joke was mocking you for being an obnoxious and irrational interlocutor. A pigeon doesn't play chess, it just flips the board, knocking all the pieces, crapping on it, and then struts around like it has won the game despite doing jack, which is you.
DUMB + DUMB = THIS CONVERSATION
LOL