Oakley BiSphaera VS Flak 2.0 XL - Sport Sunglass Comparison | SportRx

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @A.H_610
    @A.H_610 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recently purchased the Flak 2.0 XL sunglasses and I am thoroughly impressed with its performance. However, I am disappointed to find that the Prizm 24K option without polarization is not available. Even the official replacement parts website by Oakley only offers the polarized version.

  • @cedrickcamacho1
    @cedrickcamacho1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    do you all sell replacement lenses for the BISPHAERA

  • @craigbartz480
    @craigbartz480 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Rob, what glasses are you wearing in this video?

  • @aurosmith5733
    @aurosmith5733 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Oakley Bisphaera vs 100% speed coupe ? please

    • @sportrxeyewear
      @sportrxeyewear  20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Both are awesome. The nosepads on the speedcoupe are a bit more comfortable compared to those on the Bisphaera, but the the latter includes Prizm lens tech and a slimmer temple making it a good option for hat/helmet compatibility. Can't go wrong with either.

  • @edrosie24
    @edrosie24 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You make a mistake at 4 minutes. You suggest the BiSphaera is better fro cycling then say stick with the Flak XL.

    • @sportrxeyewear
      @sportrxeyewear  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi! The wording is a bit confusing. He mentions that it's easier to see over the frame of Bisphaera when in the aero position, which is NOT something a cyclist would want. Hence, why he suggests sticking with the Flak. He follows this up with... 'obviously everyone's a little bit different, that's just my opinion', meaning some face and nose shapes may pair better with the Bisphaera for cycling over the Flak. Good catch! Hope this clears up any confusion 🤙🏼

    • @edrosie24
      @edrosie24 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sportrxeyewear Riiiiight. Got it. I thought he was suggesting that looking over was a benefit. Noted