The angle of the resultant in the couple diagram is 180+8 degree for sure. But we use mass balancing to cancel the resultant couple and hence it should be in the opposite direction to that of the resultant. That's why the angle becomes 8 degree.
Surini Fernandopulle actually the direction should be opposite of closing force,he has just drawn opposite to show reaction force and the reaction force is always opposite.hope now you have understood.
@@gauravchaudhary7747 no it will be 180+30 or -(180-30) because the tail of final vector is at head of Vector Mm and if you know vector then the angle of a vector is taken from reference axis.
akhilesh khadse actually the direction should be opposite of closing force,he has just drawn opposite to show reaction force and the reaction force is always opposite.hope now you have understood
Check out our trending course on Theory of Machines - bitly.ws/K4Zr
Use coupon “TH-cam 12” to get “FLAT 12%” OFF at checkout.
You deserve an Award!!! Many thanks from South Africa
Am here coz Ive got end semester exans in 36hrs
Well I got 3 days
Great hard work sir
Yr teaching method is very nice sir . Keep going on
Sir I got marks last seen FM .. because of you thank you sir
Shouldn't the angle of the reultant in the couple diagram be 180+8??
The angle of the resultant in the couple diagram is 180+8 degree for sure. But we use mass balancing to cancel the resultant couple and hence it should be in the opposite direction to that of the resultant. That's why the angle becomes 8 degree.
Pichle vid.m angle 180+.. liye the or draw bhi same angle p kiye the force diagram m.
Fir vo kyo opposite nhi bnaye? @maxAbrahamjames
very well explained. Thank you sir
hi sir how did you find the mass of 192.5 kg. great video
direction of resultant vectors should be opposite and therefore angle w.r.t x axis will also change
You are the masiha for me as i don't get in college lecture so...
how did you find 8 degrees for the other plane in couple polygon?
why we add 180 to 30 to get angle for Mm from mass A in force polygon illustration.
Surini Fernandopulle
actually the direction should be opposite of closing force,he has just drawn opposite to show reaction force and the reaction force is always opposite.hope now you have understood.
@@somebuddy
dont u think it must be 180 - 30 then ???
@@gauravchaudhary7747 no it will be 180+30 or -(180-30) because the tail of final vector is at head of Vector Mm and if you know vector then the angle of a vector is taken from reference axis.
if 180 is added in case of force diagram why not the same is done for couple diagram, as it is also drawn opposite to it??
How u got that angles degree??
Thanks sir
The distance taken from reference plane is incorrect... Otherwise the video is good 🤘👍
Sir why is 0.1Mm in opp direction of 0.04Mm??
What if they are rotation is clockwise
very nice sir
thank you sir
why u draw couple polygen in direction of force
Too much help
I’m still confused by y we made the Length at A negative??
Our reference point is X soo when we go on the left side of X becames negative and right side of X becames positive (- +)
there is no mass finding calculation in video
Sir balancing of reciprocating masses k numerical k uper bhi video banaiye
Thanks sir for wonderful explained
in force polygon, you took the wrong scale ...
I am understand
From 11:20 to 13:19 not well explained more room for improvement
Try to exaplane clearly
Why did we add 180 to 30 for finding Orientation of Mm
akhilesh khadse
actually the direction should be opposite of closing force,he has just drawn opposite to show reaction force and the reaction force is always opposite.hope now you have understood
@@somebuddy But he didn't mention like that, he just said that its closing & so 180 + 30
@@chiragtambade2775 may be he forgot to mention that
Making videos is for weak students sir..u must have to do each & every calculations...tks
th-cam.com/video/vWJ0yIpby7s/w-d-xo.html
Bakwas
thank you sir
Bakwas