💯 and everyone over 3 years here I've meet staff from all levels and all are so positive and carring and see the good in everything I love working on this local project if you really won't to get involved you can shine I love this about the management team and sizwell staff positivity approach really does work I think what a great opportunity in life for all ages
Hello brother how are you..? Can you help me please I’m working now Southampton oil gas refinery this job nearly close soon So can I apply Size well as a concrete fnisher or ground worker i have blue card street work ticket please reply and how to direct apply this job easy?
Nuclear costs 6x what renewables do and takes 10 years to bring online. Hinkley was estimated at £9 billion, but it’s already 10x over budget at £92 billion. China is installing renewables at a rate of 5 nuclear power station equivalents per week. The only possible reason for nuclear power now is to make fuel for nuclear bombs.
Your comparisons for cost and build time will be way off when you consider the full picture. Renewable installations last only 15-30 years while nuclear installations can last up to 80 years, the lifetime capacity factor of renewables will also be in the 10%-30% range, while nuclear is around 90%. Renewables also shift a lot of the costs associated with an energy system over to the connecting infrastructure side (costs conveniently hidden), while nuclear is the plant itself. Your comment about reprocessing civilian spent fuel for non-civilian purposes is laughable, this has been banned since 1970, 54 years ago! by the United Nations, and the IAEA frequently make unannounced visits to facilities worldwide to enforce this. And even if this wasn't the case... we simply do not have the facilities or logistics in the UK to be able to process nuclear material into weapons and such facilities couldn't just be started up overnight, nor within the term of a government.
You are ignoring all the obvious benefits of nuclear; it is the most effective method by fuel per energy produced, it is much safer than fossil fuels, has total average emissions three times lower than solar energy, and takes up a tiny amount of space. The future of energy is effectively nuclear, with gas, hydroelectric and wind to back it up.
💯 and everyone over 3 years here I've meet staff from all levels and all are so positive and carring and see the good in everything I love working on this local project if you really won't to get involved you can shine I love this about the management team and sizwell staff positivity approach really does work I think what a great opportunity in life for all ages
Hello brother how are you..? Can you help me please I’m working now Southampton oil gas refinery this job nearly close soon So can I apply Size well as a concrete fnisher or ground worker i have blue card street work ticket please reply and how to direct apply this job easy?
Seen lots of opposition against Sizewell c from the locals via signage, still they ignored them and went ahead by the looks of it
Nuclear costs 6x what renewables do and takes 10 years to bring online. Hinkley was estimated at £9 billion, but it’s already 10x over budget at £92 billion. China is installing renewables at a rate of 5 nuclear power station equivalents per week. The only possible reason for nuclear power now is to make fuel for nuclear bombs.
Your comparisons for cost and build time will be way off when you consider the full picture.
Renewable installations last only 15-30 years while nuclear installations can last up to 80 years, the lifetime capacity factor of renewables will also be in the 10%-30% range, while nuclear is around 90%. Renewables also shift a lot of the costs associated with an energy system over to the connecting infrastructure side (costs conveniently hidden), while nuclear is the plant itself.
Your comment about reprocessing civilian spent fuel for non-civilian purposes is laughable, this has been banned since 1970, 54 years ago! by the United Nations, and the IAEA frequently make unannounced visits to facilities worldwide to enforce this. And even if this wasn't the case... we simply do not have the facilities or logistics in the UK to be able to process nuclear material into weapons and such facilities couldn't just be started up overnight, nor within the term of a government.
you are braindead, it only costs that much because we over regulate
You are ignoring all the obvious benefits of nuclear; it is the most effective method by fuel per energy produced, it is much safer than fossil fuels, has total average emissions three times lower than solar energy, and takes up a tiny amount of space. The future of energy is effectively nuclear, with gas, hydroelectric and wind to back it up.
You have seen an incomplete picture. Go and research again. Don't believe in Social Media.