Origin of TE and TM Modes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @noahballou6350
    @noahballou6350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Are you planning on becoming a professor? We need you in the classrooms, you are exceptionally good at explaining fundamentals and that is a rare talent in the school system

    • @zb5775
      @zb5775 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So true! He did more with a few short videos than my EM prof, in 3rd year EE, did in the whole semester.

  • @zhengyangg4708
    @zhengyangg4708 5 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    5:35 I believe there's a typo on your lecture slides. For the reflected Kx it should be Kx = Ko*sin(θ). Just for the future viewers. Great video as always!

  • @LightHolmes
    @LightHolmes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, your videos helped clear up a ton of things. Can't thank you enough.

  • @amartanshdubey9750
    @amartanshdubey9750 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Great explanation! You should also make a video showing how waves will propagate inside the rectangular waveguide.

  • @tylergeneharrison3594
    @tylergeneharrison3594 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Electromagnetic just got fun! Best explanation I believe I have seen!

  • @aJ-sk2hf
    @aJ-sk2hf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please make a follow up of this video. Great explanation!!

  • @christianmierescurra6392
    @christianmierescurra6392 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hello Jordan, great job. I couldn't find the continuation video about TE and TM modes, if there is one. Thanks.

  • @bharathchoudhary3185
    @bharathchoudhary3185 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great Quality Explanation With Details!!

  • @aydogakallem6450
    @aydogakallem6450 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this simple and clear explanation!

  • @pyrokinetikrlz
    @pyrokinetikrlz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Goddammit! That was a great explanation of TE and TM waves!

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! :D This video came out of a conversation I had with another grad student at Berkeley, Cem, he's awesome. It makes so much more sense to me this way.

  • @PTNLemay
    @PTNLemay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:40
    I find the terminology a bit confusing, because if we ask ourselves "Ok, in TE mode how are the magnetic waves propagating?" We would find them to be at right angles to the electric component and at right angles to the direction of propagation. In our volume here they would oscillate in the Z direction. This is also transverse to the direction of propagation (which I understand to be in the X direction here). I get that it's just a terminology that the industry agreed upon. But would it be false to say "In TE mode the magnetic field is also travelling transverse to the direction of propagation"?

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Uh, usually these modes are confined inside a waveguide, so they aren't *really* traveling at all, they are sort of stuck. In free space, this might be more correct to say.

  • @KaptainLuis
    @KaptainLuis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    omg this helps sooooo much! LOVE YOU! Thank you veeery much!!!

  • @حسن-د7ص6ت
    @حسن-د7ص6ت ปีที่แล้ว

    How can i determine the waveguide when be TM or TE

  • @Cb12500
    @Cb12500 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If the electric or magnetic field components from the TE and TM mode goes to zero will the wave be still an EM wave?

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nope. A magnetic field cannot exist without an electric field if the wave is to propagate.

    • @albo5194
      @albo5194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JordanEdmundsEECS So the magnetic field does then propagate in wave direction in a TE mode right? But doesnt the poynting vektor of the wave always have to be orthogonal to both electric and magnetic field?

  • @samarfawzy7240
    @samarfawzy7240 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it correct to say that s-polarized light will not give a TM mode? because the E field must be in the plane of incidence for the H field to be pointing at us? so it has to be p-polarized light?

  • @memsuniverse
    @memsuniverse 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation , many thanks

  • @satyamdas151
    @satyamdas151 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the way u explained all...

  • @mutazshannag2353
    @mutazshannag2353 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation thanks a lot for your great efforts.

  • @JorgeMiraUSC
    @JorgeMiraUSC 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job, congratulations! What program do you use for this? I specially find useful the possibility of shifting the blackboard without deleting the previous writter work. Thanks!

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Autodesk sketchbook, yeah I love infinite canvases.

  • @kevinyao7468
    @kevinyao7468 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't there be an additional term in the reflection to account for the 180 phase shift, if we are talking about microwave waveguide here?

  • @kevinyao7468
    @kevinyao7468 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since the 2 cos terms are multiplied with each other, in stead of addition, maybe it's better to say it's it's a mix of standing and traveling mode?

    • @JordanEdmundsEECS
      @JordanEdmundsEECS  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m confused as to why they multiply. You’re adding two waves on top of each other, and using linearity of Maxwell’s equations. You’re correct that there will both be a standing wave and a traveling wave :)p

    • @kevinyao7468
      @kevinyao7468 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JordanEdmundsEECS I was talking about 2y_hatE_0cos(wt-k_xX)*cos(k_zZ) @8:22

  • @ayeleleka4976
    @ayeleleka4976 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for your explanations,

  • @GurITheGurU
    @GurITheGurU 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simply Amazing ,
    Love your work , waiting for more on TM & TE modes. Are you planning a follow up , I am kinna stuck at TM mode analysis. 😅

  • @billfang3664
    @billfang3664 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Video! Could you make more video related to waveguide and finding attenuation

  • @Masongao
    @Masongao 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear

  • @niklaskras5498
    @niklaskras5498 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good video!

  • @kanishkakosala9078
    @kanishkakosala9078 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great!! Thanks man..

  • @aloysiocamposdapaz8041
    @aloysiocamposdapaz8041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are amazing

  • @phy_dude
    @phy_dude 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Decent content

  • @isaacjohnson4123
    @isaacjohnson4123 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Absolute clickbait. You didn't explain the figures in the thumbnail.

  • @syedanaushabinzakirkhan20p50
    @syedanaushabinzakirkhan20p50 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bigger and larger

  • @radjaameftah7859
    @radjaameftah7859 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very good explanation, thank you 🙏