How Did Genesis Know That?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 13K

  • @CosmicSkeptic
    @CosmicSkeptic  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1153

    Full debate available now on Pangburn Philosophy’s TH-cam channel!

    • @RinZ3993
      @RinZ3993 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      This debate is a goldmine for shorts.. Dinesh doesn't need more than 30 seconds to sound stupid

    • @VeridicusMaximus
      @VeridicusMaximus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Funny thing is that Genesis does not say that the Universe had a beginning. It actually teaches creatio ex materia and God taking that material and giving it form and function - basically order from chaos!

    • @djksan1
      @djksan1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Wait, Pangburn is still around?? They screwed so many people over back in 2018 with the event that never happened in NYC. Myself included.

    • @bengreen171
      @bengreen171 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I wish you'd been this scathing with Peterson.

    • @bignenny
      @bignenny 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Working with criminals and frauds. You must be desperate for that cash Alex

  • @j0b01231
    @j0b01231 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18977

    ‘You can’t now move the goalposts, especially if you’re still going to miss’
    Now THAT was a Hitchslap if ever I’ve heard one.

    • @jaffaarmy
      @jaffaarmy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +469

      I think he’s on his way to become more infamous than the great hitch, he is. Mid 20s and is debating the same people

    • @stevenl378
      @stevenl378 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Get hitch slapped 😂😂😂

    • @cg1906
      @cg1906 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      Do we still need to carry the idol of Hitchens hero worship around?

    • @ZombieLover84
      @ZombieLover84 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +447

      @@cg1906 Yes. He was incredibly important to the public discourse in these areas.

    • @stevenl378
      @stevenl378 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      @@ZombieLover84 💪

  • @zcobryant
    @zcobryant 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3848

    “You can’t move the goalposts, especially if you’re still going to miss.” Is one of the best zingers I’ve ever heard.

    • @michaeltaylor981
      @michaeltaylor981 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Read Job 38:9, go back and read the creation account, and do it all with the understanding that the framework has God hovering over the Earth. Lastly, when it says he “made the sun, moon, stars” it is in a complete verb form in Hebrew which means it is not stating at what point before that moment he made them. If you want to disbelieve, Satan will make it very easy. If you want the TRUTH, seek and ye shall find. You cannot grasp truth in subjects as complex as God by scratching at the surface and thinking well enough.

    • @zcobryant
      @zcobryant 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠​⁠@@michaeltaylor981 “read the religious text that I believe, and make sure you frame it up just the right way so that it makes sense.”
      Nah man. I appreciate the offer but I’m good. If you wanna believe that book, have at it!

    • @kadencoates8774
      @kadencoates8774 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      @@michaeltaylor981 "If you want to disbelieve, Satan will make it very easy. If you want the TRUTH, seek and ye shall find." Christians always say this, but I've been seeking god's truth for decades and haven't found anything.

    • @PatrickManser
      @PatrickManser 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kadencoates8774 seek harder. If you don't find him, you haven't looked hard enough. ObViOuSlY. /s

    • @HereComesThe-Sun
      @HereComesThe-Sun 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Doesn't Satan being able to manipulate our minds kinda take away from our free will/decision to believe

  • @eddymuigai3909
    @eddymuigai3909 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9706

    This debate was a public execution

    • @Xulios16
      @Xulios16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

      Not really. He said the scientific method
      reveals his belief. The only issue is that the scientific method requires observation and must be repeatable and since no one has observed it this is not scientific.😮

    • @RaphaelBraun
      @RaphaelBraun 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +279

      ​@@Xulios16No, the scientific method requires evidence, not direct observation. Besides, this is not the point of the comment. The comment intended to say, that the person thought that Alex was the clear winner in the debate !!!in their opinion!!!. If you check the comments underneath the original debate you will find a lot of comments which use very strong language to express how much Alex won this debate. They write about "massacre", "genocide", "murder", "slaughter", "destroy". Note that those are attempts to make clear that Alex not just won in their opinion, but won in such a convincing way, that just stating "Alex won" sounds like an understatement.
      It's totally fine if you don't share that opinion.

    • @eddymuigai3909
      @eddymuigai3909 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @@Xulios16 I once heard Brian Cox say something on a JRE episode in the lines of 'If you can't measure something, it does not exist'
      The scientific method doesn't always provide observable evidence but as long as you can measure it, you can prove it

    • @Xulios16
      @Xulios16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@eddymuigai3909 Yeah I think that's a logically false statement. One cannot measure love or measure consciousness etc etc. But it is as real as the air you breathe.

    • @xenon3633
      @xenon3633 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@Xulios16 I think that the Earth is "real" in a different way than love or by extension consciousness is "real" though. Yeah, consciousness is real, but is it a real tangible thing, or simply chemical reactions in the brain that we can measure. Of course it's more than the sum of its parts, which makes it the greatest mystery to modern biology, but it's certainly intangible, though real. In the same way God is intangible, making it impossible to prove or disprove, however there is a little less than an infinite amount more evidence for consciousness "existing" than god. Really difficult to discuss such things over text, but you've brought up a super interesting point about the very concept of existence (tangible and intangible) itself.

  • @7hundred_7ty7
    @7hundred_7ty7 หลายเดือนก่อน +349

    That awkward silence actually killed me 😂

    • @CJN1979
      @CJN1979 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Dude he David edited out his answer to make it look like Dinesh choked he didn't he tore his butt up before the edits he edited out almost all Dinesh is answers so it's smoke and mirrors

    • @thebirdfromtwitter1249
      @thebirdfromtwitter1249 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

      @@CJN1979what are you even talking about you can literally go to the actual thing and see nothing was edited out, just the silence to make it quicker

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@CJN1979 tore his butt up - with what? A wet flannel?

    • @jcenglish9711
      @jcenglish9711 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It’s called thinking before speaking.

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@jcenglish9711 no, that's the cognitive dissonance operating in real-time.

  • @rocklee169
    @rocklee169 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3620

    “Well in context we don’t know what day means”
    *”yeah but day 4 definitely comes after day 1”*
    😂😂

    • @ASTROTECH-R2
      @ASTROTECH-R2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

      Well, if it’s that ambiguous, then it’s not worth reading.
      How people think the Bible is a book to be followed when everything can be so skewed by personal interpretation is bonkers.
      Oh ya a God wrote this book 🤪 clearly ancient Middle Easter tribal males wrote the book.

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

    • @Mewse1203
      @Mewse1203 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

      "Yeah but it means epoch or eras"
      "Ok, that's much worse"
      😂😂
      Dinesh walked right into up to a tar pit and Alex pushed him in with a breath.

    • @waxwaine
      @waxwaine 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      1 to 7 is a priority order of creations to receive MEN, not a sequence. First, you build the house and last you put people inside

    • @Mewse1203
      @Mewse1203 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      @@waxwaine cool apologetics

  • @riskybiscuits688
    @riskybiscuits688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2983

    That was the most beautiful example of hoisting on your own petard I've ever seen. Bravo Alex for not letting him get out of his corner while not being a jerk about it.

    • @TheFPSCameron
      @TheFPSCameron 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Dinesh did look really petarded in this whole thing, yeah

    • @dirkmoras
      @dirkmoras 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I'm Dutch and I translated "hoisting on your own pretard" and I love it.

    • @riskybiscuits688
      @riskybiscuits688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dirkmoras 🤣

    • @emailvonsour
      @emailvonsour 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good job butchering Shakespeare.

    • @sirnunez7923
      @sirnunez7923 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you mean idiot , Alex is fkn stupid. Hahaha as are you. You aren’t able to read and comprehend hahahahah

  • @christophernye1970
    @christophernye1970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +428

    "All right....so..so..so..so"😂

    • @brianross7454
      @brianross7454 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So so so so YES! 😂

    • @rolosilver3256
      @rolosilver3256 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Mohammed Hijab: "Why are you stuttering?"

    • @dezeefresh5257
      @dezeefresh5257 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let There b Lght spoken by GOD Dnt mean it wz d Sun which d Earth circles.

    • @Th3Snipe
      @Th3Snipe 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@dezeefresh5257 wrf was that incoherent rambling

    • @Revolvercon
      @Revolvercon 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      A sun cannot be formed without space dust (earth).. so so so

  • @SteveSines-p3c
    @SteveSines-p3c วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Face it Alex, you wiped the floor with him, he cannot recover. 😂

  • @markhaunert5029
    @markhaunert5029 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1680

    Dinesh is creating more atheist than Alex is.

    • @ene5520
      @ene5520 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      😂😂😂

    • @1193bobmcc
      @1193bobmcc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Lmao!!

    • @Handlethis342
      @Handlethis342 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Comment of the week!

    • @AlanXEverfrost
      @AlanXEverfrost 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      It's a team effort. Dinesh sets himself up, Alex knocks him down, Dinesh stumbles and does that funny dance-in-the-air thing cartoons do as they scramble to try and stay up before falling a humiliatingly long way down.

    • @markhaunert5029
      @markhaunert5029 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @AlanXEverfrost Ha good point. That's what happens when you put the best in their field up against the worst in theirs.

  • @treyforest1999
    @treyforest1999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1366

    "How did the writers of Genesis know the universe had a beginning?" It either did or it didn't. That's a 50/50 guess

    • @SaHaRaSquad
      @SaHaRaSquad 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

      And for a human something infinite isn't even comprehensible, so they'll always make the guess that makes more sense to them.

    • @rsr6193
      @rsr6193 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Exactly 😂

    • @captainblackthumb
      @captainblackthumb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah!!! Shrodingers CAT!! LOL

    • @PromptedHawk
      @PromptedHawk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      You forget the best thing - it's actually a 100/0 guess because it plays both sides:
      The universe was created from nothing by god at genesis - beginning
      genesis 1 describes that there were waters and all that so that's existing material that god shaped into the world - no beginning, was always there, just like god
      Which interpretation? Depends on who you're arguing with, and if they're enough of a weasel it also depends on what the point in discussion is.

    • @YourWrongImRight933
      @YourWrongImRight933 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why does the Bible mention Jerusalem so much? Why is Israel currently under siege? Who predicted this?

  • @kreaturen
    @kreaturen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +923

    "How did the authors of Genesis know that?!" Good grief, imagining "a beginning" is the most intuitive thing in the world.

    • @sandroelbers
      @sandroelbers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      and yet an unfounded and unwarranted conclusion.

    • @KevinMannix-sf5zk
      @KevinMannix-sf5zk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@sandroelbers "you cant see past the end of your nose"
      interpret that :)
      you as they say are a "literal fool"

    • @yt.personal.identification
      @yt.personal.identification 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Every story needs a beginning.
      Going with a strong opener is a great literary technique.

    • @mbrum3230
      @mbrum3230 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@sandroelbers agreed. For example if there was ever absolutely nothing how would that condition ever change?

    • @KevinMannix-sf5zk
      @KevinMannix-sf5zk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CraigScottFrost Well seeing as we are the only sound focused creature on earth, then I guess saying the grower of all things does SPEAK to us all , in our sound brain created delusion
      P.S only one of our 7 brains focuses on sound, and we can over associate with that noise and pretend the rest of us does not exist , like instead of 7 gods we have the one god otherwise known as the LEFT PFC
      Notice that ? created in 7 days, you have 7 brains, its all encoded

  • @fitnessteacher1845
    @fitnessteacher1845 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Nothing more frustrating when they move the goalposts well done for holding him accountable

  • @BMCKINN7
    @BMCKINN7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1008

    Man got cooked in this debate. Completely embarrassed himself

    • @chadalpha7983
      @chadalpha7983 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Dinesh feels no shame, he's a sociopathic huckster

    • @feonor26
      @feonor26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      He obviously learned nothing from being slapped by the Hitch either when he was alive.

    • @matthewrhee8242
      @matthewrhee8242 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If one's interpretation of the book of truth counters that one's interpretation of the book of nature, then one's interpretation(s) of one or both must be wrong. Hypothesis: the Bible is the Book of Truth; and nature is truthful.

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

    • @davidspencer343
      @davidspencer343 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@matthewrhee8242 that's making fun of someone who believes that right? Like that isn't actually your take its satire?

  • @FuneFox
    @FuneFox 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4713

    "The bible got this right"
    "But it also got this wrong"
    "Well it's not a science book"
    EDIT: This comment must've struck a lot of nerves because I'm still getting notifications from it.

    • @The_Orphanizer
      @The_Orphanizer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +401

      "it just described a process!" Well, it describes the process incorrectly.

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@The_OrphanizerWhat would you say to the argument that it's supposed to be Metaphorical?

    • @The_Orphanizer
      @The_Orphanizer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

      @@m-ox2tx i would ask: "was it always assumed to be metaphorical, or did that interpretation conveniently rise to prominence after the development of the scientific revolution?"

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@The_Orphanizer Not necessarily, or else that would position most interpretations of the Bible as literal before a certain point which would be taking the argument as it's most undesirable angle.
      Certain stories are obviously meant to be metaphorical in nature, so the idea then becomes how much of the Bible can be looked at as metaphorical as a valid interpretation.
      Which is why the Bible can neither condone or condemn anything, not only because of its heavily contradictory nature but because of how one Christian may look at it when compared to another Christian.

    • @flanderg123
      @flanderg123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      When I use a metaphor crutch, I prefer a splintered reed.

  • @ga6589
    @ga6589 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +244

    Alex, I'm an old woman and have to say that I have learned a great deal from you. I so admire your ability to keep your cool and present your arguments with stunning reason and intellect. Bravo!

    • @AtriadGamasekav
      @AtriadGamasekav 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Come on you can’t be that old ))) I like Alex too. As a matter of fact I was using his videos to learn English way back in a days when he was a kid and younger version of him was not as witty as he is today but surely super intelligent and well versed and listening to him helped to make learning routine more enjoyable.

    • @antygona-iq8ew
      @antygona-iq8ew 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Alex seems to have a lot of female fans. I will check his earlier videos.
      I certainly would like to improve my English.

    • @ga6589
      @ga6589 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@AtriadGamasekav I've got fillings in my teeth way older than Alex. Let's just say I was born the year, "Mr. Sandman" and "Shake Rattle and Roll" were top hits in the US.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      He relies on skepticism, semantics, twisted logic, fallacies, and verbal shell games.

    • @AtriadGamasekav
      @AtriadGamasekav 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue oh yeah? Logic can’t be twisted it either is or it’s not. So could you please demonstrate where his statements lacked logic?

  • @weslemens5963
    @weslemens5963 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Debates like these are so important.

    • @Erathold
      @Erathold 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hahahaha 😂

    • @weslemens5963
      @weslemens5963 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @Erathold 🤷‍♂️

    • @ContemplativeCat
      @ContemplativeCat 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dinesh is out of his depth.

  • @itsmederek1
    @itsmederek1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +189

    That final comment was a death blow. It not only showed that the guy was wrong but also that the critic was listening intently to what he was saying. Masterpiece

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not believing in god won’t save you from his judgement!

    • @itsmederek1
      @itsmederek1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jbjb3907 If you truly believe that there is no point telling me lol

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@itsmederek1If God exists and his name is Jesus, that’s the best news of all! Jesus command of the spread the truth.
      Make disciples of all nations:
      In Matthew 28:18-20, Jesus gives the Great Commission, which includes making disciples of all nations.
      Proclaim the gospel:
      In Mark 16:15, Jesus says, "Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation"

    • @itsmederek1
      @itsmederek1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jbjb3907 Yuck

    • @jbjb3907
      @jbjb3907 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@itsmederek1 You do have free will… just remember that if God exist that means there are demons. You must ask yourself are you being influenced by a demon?

  • @paulrawlinson8653
    @paulrawlinson8653 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +700

    D'Souza's level of argument is pretty embarrassing

    • @sirwojenheimthethird2268
      @sirwojenheimthethird2268 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It’s right on par with the hack that he is.

    • @joshuataylor3550
      @joshuataylor3550 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It's not his fault if he's defending the bible

    • @hewasfuzzywuzzy3583
      @hewasfuzzywuzzy3583 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He's not really even arguing though. He just brushes it aside or moves the goal post whenever he can't handle his way of thinking or interpreting is challenged.

    • @shacktime
      @shacktime 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, but I think it’s equally embarrassing to assert that the universe had a beginning. Sure, we don’t have evidence of what preceded this “beginning,” and science is loathe to proclaim things without evidence, but something was definitely always and infinitely there.
      I see the universe more as a container of sorts that holds properties of various types in perpetual states of flux. When one area of the universe is expanding another is contracting. Where a seeming void exists in one area of the universe another area is teeming with activity.

    • @mickquigley3083
      @mickquigley3083 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. He should just tell the other guy he is an idiot like all our science that is buffoonarism to say the least

  • @3_14pie
    @3_14pie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +711

    "so why they got that bit wrong?"
    "..."
    "..."
    "... alright, so.."
    that pause lmao

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @drrickmarshall1191
      @drrickmarshall1191 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ​@@maambomumba6123If you can't see the source of light, you're not going to see the light at all.

    • @davebowman760
      @davebowman760 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@maambomumba6123 before the Sun was formed, there was no Earth to be standing on for any observer. Also, the text doesn't mention that at all (because of course, its author was unaware of all of this), so that's a wide interpretation based on nothing.

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@davebowman760 since you’re critiquing the Bible you’d have to point to what it actually says. Genesis 1:1 says “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”. This was the first epoch of creation. The first “day” so to speak. During this epoch the Sun was created before the earth. Also during this epoch the light from the Sun diffuses through the Earths atmosphere “let there be light”, Genesis 1:3. The Sun itself however only became discernible, as the source of this light, in the fourth creation epoch, the “fourth day”.
      The perspective of the narration is implicit in the text itself. The Bible was written for mankind and the Earth was prepared for mankind’s existence. So it makes total sense that the perspective of the creation account be written from the viewpoint of an observer on Earth.
      The Bible NEVER claims the Sun was created after the Earth. I’d encourage you to go over the first chapter of Genesis once more and read it with this information in mind. Thanks.

    • @davebowman760
      @davebowman760 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@maambomumba6123 as David Wood says, "Miracle of reinterpretation!"

  • @Aaronsl-202
    @Aaronsl-202 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    BRILLIANT!!! I’ve been watching all of your videos as I recently discovered your channel, and you are brilliant and articulate. Keep it up!

  • @danielvining4947
    @danielvining4947 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +701

    “The concept of day doesn’t mean day”
    *Ken Ham aggressively storms in and takes Dinesh’s mic*

    • @asagoldsmith3328
      @asagoldsmith3328 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Battle of the creationist hacks

    • @Mirrorgirl492
      @Mirrorgirl492 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

      And Jordan Petersen says: "That depends on what you mean by 'day'."

    • @smears6039
      @smears6039 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@Mirrorgirl492then Peterson starts bawling his eyes out

    • @tecategpt1959
      @tecategpt1959 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The concept of day in the original Hebrew doesn’t mean day* if you couldn’t understand what he meant by that then you shouldn’t be participating in these debates in the first place

    • @bobbyfartz5591
      @bobbyfartz5591 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jordan Peterson looks on happily

  • @Anglomachian
    @Anglomachian 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1059

    “How did primitive shepherds know that the universe had a beginning?”
    They didn’t. They guessed.

    • @MrThatguy333
      @MrThatguy333 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +140

      50/50 shot, also it's hard to imagine something not having a beginning. That's why God's in almost all religions have a beginning, few Religions imagine a God that exists without a beginning.

    • @Anglomachian
      @Anglomachian 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@MrThatguy333 very true. Earlier iterations if the Abrahamic god have a beginning before it’s current timeless spaceless flavour

    • @hayskig1226
      @hayskig1226 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      The universe to them was 5 planets the earth, moon and the sun. The stars were holes in the sky with the light of heaven shining through them.

    • @VenusFeuerFalle
      @VenusFeuerFalle 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      and even more funny, we might be wrong about it all along xD

    • @donsample1002
      @donsample1002 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      And Hebrew scholars generally consider versions of the bible with “In the beginning God created…” to be a bad translation. The first phase should be more like “When God began to create…” and have him working from pre-existing materials.

  • @mikeleaptrott
    @mikeleaptrott 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    This was great! I watched the whole debate twice. It’s hard to tell if D’Sousa is this incompetent or just didn’t care to prepare at all. Maybe both.

    • @Sanxioned1
      @Sanxioned1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      It's both. He got so used to steamrolling unregulated college first years that he thinks he doesn't need to use anything more sophisticated.
      Look at how he keeps trying to shift the topic to what the word "day" means instead of dealing with the incorrect chronology of the Bible. What a day means is irrelevant -- sequence is what matters.
      And some other debaters would definitely take the bait and let this snake slither away.

    • @ghytd766
      @ghytd766 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's worse, he's dishonest to the core.

    • @shambhav9534
      @shambhav9534 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Not being prepared is fine to a degree, but he didn't even know what he even believed, IMO.

    • @Vinny2fingers
      @Vinny2fingers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's because people who believe the Bible don't question it so he's always had people who believe every word. You'd be surprised how many people think the earth is 3000 years old.

    • @emmanuel.n8458
      @emmanuel.n8458 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Vinny2fingersthe Bible is the most questioned, analyzed, book in history..no other book comes close. This guys just not smart enough to defend the Bible. Also, the Bible account of creation makes absolute sense unless if you wanna tell me you have proof to show you can get smth from nothing.

  • @williamvetter5960
    @williamvetter5960 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge

    • @berenvalari
      @berenvalari 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      The fear of the lord is the beginning of nonsense.

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Then why are theists typically ignorant?

    • @gorilla30100
      @gorilla30100 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@stevelaw3886 The average theist knows nothing. The average atheist knows everything, which also means they know nothing. It's all the same.

    • @stevelaw3886
      @stevelaw3886 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@gorilla30100 I neither think theists know nothing, nor that atheists know everything, nor that everything and nothing are the same.

    • @gorilla30100
      @gorilla30100 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@stevelaw3886 What I am saying is that the average theist that I have dealt with knows nothing about their religion and hasn't bothered to study anything about their religion. As a Christian, I believe this is a great problem, and that they ought to study it much more.
      The average atheist I have dealt with believes that they "know everything", meaning that they can point out a few bible verses (Usually something they cherry-picked online, and then use those few Bible verses to say that they've read it in it's entirety, historical context and the rest of the pages), and make a few arguments that they believe no one has ever debated or heard about before, and that they are geniuses enlightened by their own intellect for going against the grain.
      In reality, it's a much more nuanced conversation and it is, at the very least, extremely reasonable to be a believer even if you do not believe it is true, it has a ton of merit for it being true, just as I believe it is also reasonable to be an atheist.
      It annoys me to see a large growth in pseudo intellectuals trying to flex their knowledge (Even though it is incomplete) to pretend as if they've got it all figured out, and to call others ignorant as if they're not just the same.
      It is one thing to be ignorant and to be aware of it. It is another thing entirely to be ignorant and pretend as if you aren't, and that's the problem I have with a lot of atheists today. Naturally, there are Christians like this too, and this doesn't just apply to religion (This can even apply to myself at times), but I see it very often amongst atheists and it seems to go unnoticed.

  • @thomasherzog86
    @thomasherzog86 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    The funny thing about this is, that no scientist will tell you that we "KNOW" the universe had a beginning. We certainly know that its expending out of something we call singularity - but we dont know whether thats the beginning of its existence.
    However, we DO KNOW that the sun was before the earth.

    • @VenusFeuerFalle
      @VenusFeuerFalle 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      even the singularity is nothing but a working hypothesis, which probably did never exist in the first place...

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Actually we really don't know if the earth or the sun was formed first, for all it's possible earth was formed as a rogue planet and only later entered the solar system.

    • @thomasherzog86
      @thomasherzog86 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@AndrewJF
      Nope, thats pretty much impossible.

    • @matsab7930
      @matsab7930 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AndrewJFplanetary scientist here; we’re very confident that the earth formed after the sun. Even if you make the argument that it originated outside the solar system, we date it using the radioactive decay of material on earth. We can then date more primitive objects in the solar system such as asteroids to determine a sort of maximum age of the solar system. This all tends toward 4.6 billion years.
      The sun was the first body to form in our solar system; by definition this is the case because the collapse of a solar nebula into a star is what begins the formation of a solar system, hence it must be at least as old as the oldest bodies in the solar system (excepting those originating outside our solar system, which are a tiny minority), which puts the suns age at older than the Earth.
      There’s more to it than this, if you’re curious the research is generally publicly available; if it’s not, you can use sci-hub to access it ;)

    • @Ciph3rzer0
      @Ciph3rzer0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Whatever the "universe" is changes the way you talk about it. Most of the time scientists are talking about the observable (material) universe. When they talk about the universe being compressed to a marble before the big bang, they mean the matter in the observable universe would be compressed to that size. It could have been a marble in an meter cubed block, which all also expanded. And of course there are components of the universe, of reality like forces, which didn't just emerge WITH the universe, because our models suppose the behavior of forces stays the same throughout time.
      Scientists talk about the "creation" of our *universe as we observe it today*. It's basically the boundary of what science could ever hope to explain. IMO There probably was or still is something else from which we our universe emerged. "empty space" has particles being created all the time. The universe could be an emergent phenomenon of what we call empty space. Some theoretical models work off of this idea.
      Apologists use a different conception of universe. They want to say that "creation of the universe" is everything that isn't heaven, the mortal realm. And then of course it sounds stupid to say a big bang 'from nothing' created the universe. Clearly it was God!
      I'm not sure if that distinction is clear, but science is very reserved about what it even claims it's possible to know. That's the difference. Science is mostly interested in what's "useful" rather than true. That's why we can use inaccurate orbital models of electrons to make predictions even though probability clouds are more accurate.
      Or why you can use a map to navigate even though the earth isn't flat. It's about the simplest model that can accurately predict outcomes given on the factors you need to account for. You don't need to account for curvature when driving to the pub.

  • @planetlumi4138
    @planetlumi4138 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +333

    Alex is back to his old debating

    • @Dann-md9eq
      @Dann-md9eq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And we miss that

    • @Johnvwilliams0
      @Johnvwilliams0 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes he debates Uneducated shills and claims he’s debunking Christianity 😂

    • @jackwhitbread4583
      @jackwhitbread4583 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Dann-md9eqI don't, honestly he's a pretty average debator and nowhere near the league of Dawkins, Dillahunty or Ra. There are dozens and dozens of atheist activists who are a million times more effective than Alex.

    • @Winskl9010
      @Winskl9010 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@jackwhitbread4583You don’t know anything about what qualifies as a good debaters if you genuinely think Richard Dawkins is a better debater than him 😂 it’s so obvious you’re a disguised hater. The man is only 24 and is on an equal level/better than the ones you listed

    • @justsomeguy859
      @justsomeguy859 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jackwhitbread4583Aron Ra is a horrible debater. I want to like him, but he just embarrasses himself. He’s not careful with his words or his thinking, and he goes off on completely unrelated tangents arguing against irrelevant points that the other person never made. Matt is pretty good in debates, but his debate/conversation with Alex about veganism was just flat out embarrassing for Matt. And I say that as a person who is not vegan. I agree with Matt on the subject, and still found his arguments to be horrible. He is nowhere near Alex’s level in knowledge of philosophy, or just base intellect. Alex is charismatic, knowledgeable, articulate, and absolutely brilliant. He is already surpassing all the great atheists that came before him.

  • @DarkMatter2525
    @DarkMatter2525 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Dinesh just kept digging that hole.

    • @skepticalcentral8795
      @skepticalcentral8795 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      MY MAN GOOD TO SEE YOU HERE!

    • @Green-ishEcho
      @Green-ishEcho 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      THE LEGEND IS HERE!!

    • @rafetizer
      @rafetizer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You just pop up everywhere lol

    • @magicker8052
      @magicker8052 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      we're not worthy

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      not really - Alex just kept shifting semantics and changing contexts by manipulating language.

  • @oludave
    @oludave หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Alex is well articulated here and Dinesh was falling into the contextual trap. An underlying factor is that the Scriptures are '"spiritually discerned" and as much as logic may try to dissect each nuance, we will only discover with time, that we were off, and the Holy Writ is spot on.
    My simple take on this matter...
    3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day (Genesis Chapter 1)
    These are simple words in our context but they speak depth beyond our common grasp. I think the concept of "the day" was neither chronological nor depictive. In verses 3 to 5, seemingly personas were regarded as light and day, and later, on day 4, the talk shifted to sun and moon. All of these are preceded by the concept of the "first day," which was ordered as evening followed by morning.
    A better grasp suggests that Genesis 1 was a recreation in itself due to the "darkness covering the deep" in verse 2 which the Spirit of God brooded over to recrop the creation. This may be as a result of the rebellion of the fallen star. But again, these are excerpts here and there on our own means to interpret these.
    We know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when the full comes, we shall know as we are known.
    Great debate as Alex challenges the norm for the true Christian to search the deep things of the Spirit. We shall know the truth, and the truth shall make us free!

    • @dre.creator
      @dre.creator 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Love this!!

  • @Deadman1000
    @Deadman1000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +360

    I first saw Dinesh get owned by Hitchens and now I get to see the next generation do it too, well done 😂

    • @PramodKumar-gy8lb
      @PramodKumar-gy8lb 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      When you hold on to a false premise every generation will smack you down.

    • @lukepoplawski3230
      @lukepoplawski3230 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I haven’t seen that debate yet, but funnily enough if you watch the intro to this discussion two moderators discuss the Hitchens v Denish debate and they both agree that Denish got the better of Hitchens. Again, I haven’t seen it and can’t draw an opinion yet, but that’s what the commenters from Pangburn (the hosts of this discussion) said.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lukepoplawski3230he gave Hitchens a hard time . Alex had him on the run for most of this .

    • @ryanparker4996
      @ryanparker4996 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@PramodKumar-gy8lb you there: prove that the universe happened by accident

    • @robertluechtefeld5017
      @robertluechtefeld5017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a matter opinion.

  • @steeter93
    @steeter93 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

    Like watching a sand castle slowly collapse.

    • @MaGaO
      @MaGaO 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not slowly though

    • @andresfelipegaspar2980
      @andresfelipegaspar2980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But this was a bunch of naipes without any kind of shape falling apart

    • @gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120
      @gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because Genesis is not a History book but one of myths as most of the Bible, understanding myth as a narrative to explain something profund not easily explained otherwise.
      Some events described are historic but many are not
      If you defend the Bible validation as an History book, you will always loose

    • @MaGaO
      @MaGaO 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@gabrielalbertocastillomarq6120
      Unfortunately, some argue for its fitting current science through "interpretation" (AKA hermeneutics).

  • @InShadowsLinger
    @InShadowsLinger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    I loved how you mopped the floor with him and didn’t give him any room for bullshit.

    • @InShadowsLinger
      @InShadowsLinger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@amt4653 thanks

    • @cuzzohh2768
      @cuzzohh2768 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Continue on living your spiritually shallow shithole of a life and see where that gets your you purposeless sack of cells and shit.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      by misunderstanding the point, yes.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue the only person misunderstanding the point here, is you

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​​@@ithurtsbecauseitstrueWhen you have to misunderstand truth to even get the point, you're not making a point or telling the truth. But you are right about the truth hurting, bc you've lashed out at like 4 truthful comments on here they hurt you so bad. You know, you can just jump over to the truth here with us and stop hurting, right?

  • @ІванПугач-х5к
    @ІванПугач-х5к หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It depends on how one interprets Scripture and scientific evidence regarding the sun's and Earth's ages, as these are speculative discussions that may or may not be accurate. The Bible in Genesis focuses more on why the universe was created rather than how. However, based on verse 6, one could argue that the expanse (or Earth) was formed after the sun. Before this, the Earth appears to have been a water-covered or hydrogen-dominated sphere, which might not align with modern definitions of a planet of Earth.

    • @donfette5301
      @donfette5301 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It’s just a silly myth made up by ignorant superstitious savages in the Bronze Age. Means nothing, in reality.

  • @iammichaeldavis
    @iammichaeldavis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +246

    “You can’t just move the goalposts; especially if you’re still gonna miss” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @d4024
      @d4024 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah when conversations devolve from truth seeking to rhetorical scoring.

    • @iammichaeldavis
      @iammichaeldavis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@georgehatzimanolakis1904 might want to carefully re-read what he said, big dawg

    • @iammichaeldavis
      @iammichaeldavis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@georgehatzimanolakis1904 con-ver-say-shuns, big homie

    • @georgehatzimanolakis1904
      @georgehatzimanolakis1904 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iammichaeldavis oh, my bad

    • @bennin9455
      @bennin9455 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He didn't even make a point though science is not 100% true it's theory

  • @sparksdog8111
    @sparksdog8111 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +243

    "Alright, so..." just might be the funniest line ever said, at least within this specific context.

    • @againstdrivingdrunk614
      @againstdrivingdrunk614 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      zuess created the sun

    • @JDdr86
      @JDdr86 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@againstdrivingdrunk614*Zeus

    • @againstdrivingdrunk614
      @againstdrivingdrunk614 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JDdr86 the believers have been tried and shaken, by a mighty force.

  • @albertobottopoala7691
    @albertobottopoala7691 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    Protect this man at all costs

    • @weedlol
      @weedlol 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Yeah we need to get Dinesh out of there before he dies of embarassment.

    • @cassiusdhami9215
      @cassiusdhami9215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      👏🏾​@@weedlol👍🏾
      😆😅😂🤣

    • @cassiusdhami9215
      @cassiusdhami9215 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd be okay with that ​@@weedlol... unfortunately you can't embarrass the shameless. 😊

    • @paulrawlinson8653
      @paulrawlinson8653 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Protect him from what?

    • @Feefa99
      @Feefa99 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Me jumping with backflip in front of Alex protecting him from religious fanatics while Whitney Houston singing

  • @ashlynjobe4967
    @ashlynjobe4967 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    “Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day.”
    ‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1‬:‭2‬-‭5‬ ‭

  • @Suparaf
    @Suparaf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    Alex has a very sharp mind. Dinesh probably thought he was debating some college student.

    • @tcamp1969
      @tcamp1969 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Dinesh clearly didn't prep at all for this.

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not really. Even a 5 year old can see through his bullshit

    • @DominicSJarrett
      @DominicSJarrett 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That changed after Alex's opening speech. You can tell when Dinesh stood up and started his opening. You could hear in his voice he started crapping himself realising what he got himself into.

    • @Nuffsed81
      @Nuffsed81 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@subhuman3408care to explain how Alex is bullshiting? or are you just going to assert "bullshit" and hope nobody asks for an example of how? Clearly the video shows who is full of bs. The Bible was worng and the dishonest muppet can't even admit it. Isn't dishonesty suppose to be sinful.

    • @johnallen8043
      @johnallen8043 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dinesh was unprepared and Alex was uneducated.

  • @CatDaddyGuitar
    @CatDaddyGuitar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    The stunned look on Dinesh's face 😂😂😂
    Alex slapped him hard.

    • @tuffwith2effs899
      @tuffwith2effs899 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How somebody who doesn't see this coming ended up in this debate is beyond me.

    • @CatDaddyGuitar
      @CatDaddyGuitar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@tuffwith2effs899 Desperately trying to defend his confirmation bias. The problem with Dinesh, Tour, Peterson, etc is that they've invested their entire reputation on being intellectually dishonest and if they concede to any logical conclusion, they're ruined.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ....only in how to describe depth to someone obviously going for retarded verbal twists and cheap shots. It's hard to describe nuance to a strawmanning low-brow gotcha-artist.

    • @munchkingod6
      @munchkingod6 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CatDaddyGuitarthis. The only way Dinesh can maintain his positions (especially political ones) is by lying. He lies constantly because his political beliefs are fundamentally incompatible with reality.

    • @rathraven1313
      @rathraven1313 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alex needs to be slapped by the fact a society based Christian valves allows him to exist.

  • @grayintheuk8021
    @grayintheuk8021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Cognative disconnect with this magical thinker. Nice job Alex.

  • @neotheone477
    @neotheone477 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Alex doing some serious hitchslaps here 😂

  • @johnanthony1141
    @johnanthony1141 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Person: I'm going to be debating someone.
    Other person: oh cool...who are you debating?
    Person: Alex O'Connor
    Other person: been nice knowing you

    • @kidohchi
      @kidohchi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No sh!t-
      He is sharp and knowledgeable

    • @geroffmilan3328
      @geroffmilan3328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Other person: have you prepared your will & put your estate in order?
      Dinesh: what does "prepare" mean?

    • @tklyte
      @tklyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂🤣🤣 That made my day.

    • @rathraven1313
      @rathraven1313 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kidohchi Like a five year old not getting his favorite toy.

  • @CrippIusDungledeen
    @CrippIusDungledeen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    I love how he had nothing to say for a few seconds, just trying to fathom what you just said

    • @dabartos4713
      @dabartos4713 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they're ready for philosophers who will indulge them but when you put it 1:1 it always has to fail.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thats not what happened. but ok

    • @CrippIusDungledeen
      @CrippIusDungledeen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Did you even watch the video?

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CrippIusDungledeen Yeah. And that's not what happened.
      What happened was he brought up where Genesis coincides with a truth that even science denied for quite some time: that the universe was finite.
      Science held that it was eternal until proven wrong.
      Genesis - in teaching that God made it... coincided with a scientific fact - while not being ABOUT science.
      It is about refuting pagans who ALSO thought the universe was eternal - or in other cases created by some hot god sex. Genesis refutes that by saying God made it. It also refutes the idea that the sun, moon and stars are gods. Nope. The Bible says they are all just creation. This also COINCIDES with a science fact - while not being about science.
      The look you're seeing on his face is:
      Okay, we're gonna strawman this with no nuance and no critical thinking and no understanding of purpose or meaning - and just pretend it's all aligning to science now.
      He knew it was immediately a low-end low-thought gotcha kind of line of attack. He PROBABLY heard Alex was smart and a good philosopher. So he probably thought this line of attack was beneath Alex. But if you know Alex, you know he runs for the shell game semantic low end skepticism and strawman presentations A LOT.
      So that look is: crap, how do I explain this to someone unwilling to go there?
      It was ALEX that moved the goal post to taking Genesis as a science description rather than his opponents points which was that the Bible got this right even when handling OTHER topics. Just like the Bible knew about ocean currents - but only poetically references it in praises and prayers to God. The Psalms are not suddenly science books.
      Even if Maury searched for and found the ocean currents due to the Bibles praise of God.

    • @anthonyernst999
      @anthonyernst999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Bro, you still haven't explained why the book would state that the Earth was made BEFORE the sun. You just explained that the book says God made it all, but it still has the timeline wrong so why wouldn't other things be wrong?

  • @alecbarrett3607
    @alecbarrett3607 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    "And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day." Genesis 1:3-5

    • @HH-hm3qn
      @HH-hm3qn หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Right?! I was thinking that too when I watched this. What's the business about Day 4?

    • @beewest5704
      @beewest5704 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Day 1: light & darkness
      Day 2: sky & sea
      Day 3: land
      Day 4: SUN, moon & sky

    • @missyllanita
      @missyllanita หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      This is all about what came first the chicken or the egg. God made the plants with it's seeds and the next day the plants had the sun. Why can't God not create something in one day? Time does not exist where he is. He created time.

    • @LuisRivers-g7b
      @LuisRivers-g7b หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I was just wondering how "God" had Idea to create without a brain or thoughts!
      There has to be something available in life in order to be creative with!! Hense,"God" is a ridiculous concept.
      For instance:" let there be light" how the hell is light even a concept if it never existed!!!
      "Let there be water" if the concept never appeared in a thought that was never a thought!!!
      If someone here can explain this ,then, you are the smartest person in the universe!!!!

    • @LuisRivers-g7b
      @LuisRivers-g7b หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@beewest5704I was just wondering how "God" had Idea to create without a brain or thoughts!
      There has to be something available in life in order to be creative with!! Hense,"God" is a ridiculous concept.
      For instance:" let there be light" how the hell is light even a concept if it never existed!!!
      "Let there be water" if the concept never appeared in a thought that was never a thought!!!
      If someone here can explain this ,then, you are the smartest person in the universe!!!!

  • @Locreai
    @Locreai หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never allows a single point to be finished in his life. He's arguing himself.

    • @Khourschet
      @Khourschet 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is why verbal debates are virtually worthless, they exist only to generate applause and reaction. Good arguments are formed properly through text so as to be fleshed out. Alex and his ilk are sophists who trap people in linguistic games, laying traps by implicit assumptions in the initial question/statement that the opposition is unprepared for or overlooks.

  • @nathanedison8692
    @nathanedison8692 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    Starts off trying to claim a scientific miracle in the Bible, and within a minute he resorts to the “Well the Bible’s not a science textbook” excuse. You can’t have it both ways. Either it’s talking about science and is wrong, or it’s not talking about science, negating the point of your entire argument.

    • @chazrooks4681
      @chazrooks4681 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How do you know that the actual clip was within a minute. When the clip is a minute long? Lol its been editied.

    • @nathanedison8692
      @nathanedison8692 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@chazrooks4681 ok, 3 minutes. Whatever, same point.

    • @Truthman1-o3u
      @Truthman1-o3u 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Old Testament is NOT supposed to be taken literally. It is symbolic, allegorical, mythological and metaphorical. When atheists dismiss Genesis so deftly, they are knocking down a strawman. They are deliberately, or perhaps not deliberately understanding the book in the manner that it was supposed to be understood. We are then at cross purposes, science and religion will never be reconciled in this way

    • @1986statechamps
      @1986statechamps 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Science has no answer

    • @GodsDisciple7
      @GodsDisciple7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey there, God loves you❤️, please read everything thank you.😊🙏
      Discover True Hope and Unconditional Love
      Hey there! Did you know that God loves you more than you can imagine? He created you and desires a close relationship with you. The Bible tells us in John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." 1 John 4:9-10 says, "This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins." ❤️📖
      Our Problem:
      We all make mistakes, which the Bible calls sin. Sin separates us from God and creates chaos in our lives. Romans 3:23 says, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." This sin separates us from God and leads to spiritual death. Romans 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."
      God's Solution:
      Here’s the incredible part: God loves us so much that He sent Jesus, His Son, to solve our sin problem. Romans 5:8 tells us, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.' Jesus lived a perfect life and willingly died on the cross for our sins. Then He rose from the dead, demonstrating His power over sin and death.🙏✝️
      What We Need to Do:
      God offers us a fresh start and eternal life through Jesus. To receive this gift, we must repent-turn away from our sins, believe in Jesus, and choose to follow Him. Acts 3:19 says, 'Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord.' (Romans 10:9 assures us, 'If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.🕊️🙌
      Reasons to believe:
      1. Countless individuals, including me, have encountered God in deeply personal ways-through answered prayers, supernatural phenomena, miraculous healings, and transformative encounters that defy logical or scientific explanation affirming the existence of a higher power, which we believe to be God. Furthermore, witnessing demonic activity and the reality of spiritual warfare underscores the existence of a supernatural realm. These experiences not only highlight the battle between good and evil but also demonstrate the necessity of seeking God's protection and love. These experiences often bring a profound sense of awareness, peace, purpose, and assurance of God’s presence and love in their lives.🌟✨
      "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand." Isaiah 41:10
      2. Life Transformation: People from diverse backgrounds and circumstances have experienced radical life changes through faith in Jesus Christ. They’ve overcome deep-seated addictions, healed from emotional wounds, and found renewed hope and direction. Their stories of transformation stand as powerful testimony to the life-changing power of the gospel.🌿🌈
      Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!" 2 Corinthians 5:17
      3. Historical Evidence: The life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ are not only central to Christian faith but are also supported by substantial historical evidence. Numerous non-Christian historical sources and early Christian writings corroborate key events, affirming the credibility of Jesus’ existence, crucifixion, and the empty tomb.📜🌍
      4. Fulfillment of Prophecies: Jesus fulfilled numerous prophecies from the Old Testament Scriptures that were written centuries before His birth. These prophecies include specific details about His birthplace, lineage, suffering, death, and resurrection. The fulfillment of these prophecies provides compelling evidence of Jesus’ divine identity as the promised Messiah.🌟✝️
      5. Logical Consistency: Faith in God through Jesus Christ offers a coherent worldview that addresses humanity’s deepest existential questions. It provides a framework for understanding the meaning of life, the reality of suffering, and the possibility of forgiveness and redemption. This faith does not require ignoring facts but rather integrates historical, philosophical, and experiential evidence into a compelling narrative of truth and hope.🧠💡
      6. Transformed Communities: Throughout history and even today, communities of believers in Jesus Christ have demonstrated remarkable unity, sacrificial love, and positive societal impact. From charitable works and social justice initiatives to advancements in education and healthcare, the gospel has inspired individuals and communities to live out their faith in tangible ways that benefit society as a whole.🌍❤️
      7. Personal Relationship with God: Beyond mere intellectual belief, faith in Jesus Christ opens the door to a deep, personal connection with God. Through prayer, worship, and the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, believers engage in ongoing communion with God. This relationship brings profound spiritual fulfillment, guidance, and an increasing awareness of His presence in their lives. It's not just about knowing about God but experiencing His love and guidance firsthand, shaping a meaningful and transformative journey of faith.🫂❤️‍🔥
      Simple Prayer of Response:
      Heavenly Father,
      Thank You for loving me unconditionally and for sending Your Son, Jesus, to die for my sins. I confess that I’ve made mistakes, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus died on the cross and rose again to give me new life. I invite Him into my heart as my Savior and Lord. Please help me to follow You faithfully and to live according to Your will each day.
      In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏✝️
      If you prayed this prayer sincerely, congratulations! You’ve begun a wonderful journey with God. Here are some steps you can take to grow in your faith:
      1. Find a Church: Look for a local church, where you can learn more about God, worship with others, and build supportive relationships. I recommend the Catholic Church because Im a Catholic Christian.⛪🤝
      2. Read the Bible: Start reading the Bible regularly to discover more about God’s love, His promises, and how He wants you to live.📖🕊️
      3. Pray: Spend time in prayer every day, talking to God and listening for His guidance and comfort.🙌🌿
      4. Connect with Others: Surround yourself with fellow believers who can encourage and support you in your spiritual journey.🌟🤗
      5. Live Out Your Faith: Seek opportunities to serve others, show kindness, and share God’s love with those around you.🌍❤️
      My Note:
      • I recommend you to pray The Divine Mercy Chaplet daily at 3pm.
      • I recommend you to pray the Holy Rosary (1-2x daily) or praying in tongues daily.
      • I recommend you to pray The Angelus prayer, The Lord's prayer, Hail Mary prayer, St. Michael prayer, Angel of God prayer, Glory be prayer daily. I recommend you to pray these prayers (3x daily): (Morning) 6am, (Noon) 12pm, and (Evening) 6pm.
      Recommended Christian YT channels:
      1. The Catholic Crusade
      2. Last Days
      3. Sid Roth It's Supernatural
      4. Sensus Fidelium
      5. David diga Hernandez
      6. Vlad Savchuk
      7. Isaiah Saldivar
      8. Brother Hyeok
      9. Richard Lorenzo Jr.
      10. DLM Christian Lifestyle
      11. Bible Project
      12. Ascension presents
      There are many more on YT if you research. Matthew 7:7, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you."
      Remember, God has a plan and purpose for your life, and He promises to be with you every step of the way. Jeremiah 29:11 says, "For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."🌟🕊️
      God bless you, and remember-Jesus loves you, I love you, and together, we can experience the fullness of God’s amazing love. 😊🙏❤️
      #JesusChrist #Christianity #GodsLove #FaithJourney #EternalLife #Prayer #SpiritualJourney #ShareTheGospel

  • @rogerwelsh2335
    @rogerwelsh2335 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Love this clip.
    Dinesh acts like such a know it all and to see him at a loss for words is priceless

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When was he at a loss for words exactly?

    • @joshua.recovers
      @joshua.recovers 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Typical kind of response to someone who doesn't believe.

    • @TheCaliRhino
      @TheCaliRhino 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, cuz all those edits & jump cuts make it really clear what responses were made to which statements. I don’t go to Dinesh for my theology, but the interpretation of Genesis is misleading if you’re looking at it as literal. Let there be light wasn’t the creation of the sun, it was the clearing of the sky/clouds/darkness.

    • @Person19943
      @Person19943 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@markwildt5728when he contradicted what he just said himself. “How did the Bible know?” And knowing are observations, and observations is science, and the Bible is it a scientific book. It all gets confusing and it’s because he rushed out his words

    • @benjamink8448
      @benjamink8448 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "..... alright... so, so so ... so we're... yes ahem". Technically, he said some words right?

  • @AnnoyingNewsletters
    @AnnoyingNewsletters 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Apologists took gold 🥇 in Mental Gymnastics, Jumping to Conclusions & Moving the Goal Posts.

    • @John1samar
      @John1samar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Earth is existence.
      😮
      Repent atheist.

    • @markmorris8532
      @markmorris8532 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@John1samar
      😂

    • @southernpatriot6169
      @southernpatriot6169 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dinesh is not an Apologist. Let this clown debate a true Apologist !

    • @Heeect00rrr
      @Heeect00rrr หลายเดือนก่อน

      Verse one: let there be light 🤷

  • @TheTruest
    @TheTruest 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Some people take Genesis literally, others recognize it as a poem or allegorical.
    It's all about what u want to see and what argument u want to come with when it comes to the creation story.

    • @donfette5301
      @donfette5301 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Genesis is a silly primitive myth made up by Bronze Age savages. Yawn.

  • @kami_1789
    @kami_1789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    Dinesh is so insufferable, but apologists usually are

    • @DRWH044
      @DRWH044 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Dinesh is no apologist. He is not an authority on theology.

    • @m-ox2tx
      @m-ox2tx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@DRWH044Exactly.

    • @solacedagony1234
      @solacedagony1234 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@DRWH044 Apologists aren't either usually.

    • @DRWH044
      @DRWH044 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@solacedagony1234 I don't know what apologists you are familiar with, many are not, but many others are.

    • @solacedagony1234
      @solacedagony1234 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@DRWH044 Apologists are there to keep their flock. You're talking about scholars.

  • @chinonsooragwam8833
    @chinonsooragwam8833 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

    Why is this guy arguing for Genesis as a scientifically accurate representation when early church fathers agreed it was metaphorical💀

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Who were those early church fathers?

    • @juanausensi499
      @juanausensi499 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@ApolloThyrteen Before protestantism and literalism, there were catholics and orthodox. They always saw genesis as a metaphor. Literalism is just one of the last heresies.

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@juanausensi499 a 3 minute google search proves you wrong. 3 literal minutes, not allegorical minutes. MOST take it allegorically but there were many who took it literally just like today. You should be able to defend your Church without lying.

    • @juanausensi499
      @juanausensi499 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@ApolloThyrteen The existence of non-literal passages is scholarly acknowledged as far as the 1st century, including the genesis narrative. The general idea was even older and it's contained in the proper text. Read Galatians 4:21-31 or Hebrews 4:12m for example, or see also how Matthew interprets Hosea 11:1 and Isaiah 7:14.
      There is also a huge gap between the Bible is compiled as something we can recognize today and its translation to languages that regular people could understand. At that time, the interpretation of the people was the interpretation of the church. Of course, it stands to reason it is possible for latin/greek-knowing individuals who interpreted the Bible literally, BUT that means they weren't catholics/orthodox. That's why i said catholic/orthodox and not christians.
      I bet in your 3 minute search you didn't found anything from Philo of Alexandria, Origen, Iraeneus of Lyons or Augustine of Hippo.
      It doesn't matter, really. I would like you and me to be able to reach some sort of agreement: can we say literalism was pretty minoritary BEFORE protestantism?
      This shouldn't be relevant , but i'm not defending any church.

    • @ApolloThyrteen
      @ApolloThyrteen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@juanausensi499 first I apologize for the unnecessary sarcasm in my previous post. I cannot say what Catholic or Protestants believed since most couldn’t read themselves. I’d have to concede that they believed whatever they were taught by priests. What I can say is the Jewish calendar is based on a literal interpretation of the Genesis account.
      The Jewish Virtual library has an article called Judaism and Evolution. Here is an excerpt from the article:
      The vast majority of classical rabbis hold that God created the world close to 6,000 years ago and created Adam and Eve from clay. This view is based on a chronology developed in a midrash, Seder Olam, which was based on a literal reading of the book of Genesis. It is considered to have been written by the Tanna Yose ben Halafta and covers history from the creation of the universe to the construction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. This chronology is widely accepted among most Orthodox Judaism today.
      The article goes on to explain how those views changed throughout history.

  • @KgBee
    @KgBee 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    “You cant move the goal post, especially when you’re going to miss” was the coldest line in history.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shows off his snark and lack of seriousness beautifully

    • @MasterPoppers
      @MasterPoppers 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Man, that copium must be great.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue it's hard to take people like you seriously, to be fair

    • @lVideoWatcherl
      @lVideoWatcherl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue why should anybody take a bloviating fraud like D'Souza seriously?

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MasterPoppersAlex completely dodged the question and deflected, then had the audacity to accuse Dinesh of moving the goal post... 🤦🏻‍♂️ What was it you were saying about copium?

  • @landonp4726
    @landonp4726 วันที่ผ่านมา

    “How did the writers of genesis know it had a beginning?” Wow such a bold prediction of those writers to guess that if something exists, then it had a beginning…

  • @mocha9072
    @mocha9072 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Dinesh D'Souza trying to be a Texas sharpshooter but he draws the circle next to the bullet hole instead of around it

    • @Mswordx23
      @Mswordx23 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol

    • @geroffmilan3328
      @geroffmilan3328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Fine work!"
      💯

    • @rathraven1313
      @rathraven1313 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alex practices the same method and is called a genius.

  • @MisterLumpkin
    @MisterLumpkin 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +358

    Dinesh looked like he got kicked by 2000 mules.

    • @rikardotsamsiyu
      @rikardotsamsiyu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😆

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This would be funnier if it were true.

    • @alexanderkurz1603
      @alexanderkurz1603 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and he wanted to fuck all 2000 of them

    • @briankenyon1543
      @briankenyon1543 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@markwildt5728cope more😂

    • @MrMusic238
      @MrMusic238 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A jackass getting kicked by 2000 jackasses

  • @SadamYT
    @SadamYT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    "The need for comfort and the need to belong will make people accept the most stupid conditions and then defend them as their own." - Christopher Hitchens
    (forgive possible misquotation, was written from memory)

    • @NevillePeter777
      @NevillePeter777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      would that include you?

    • @ankyspon1701
      @ankyspon1701 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Bible was also written from memory but you don't appear willing to forgive that.

    • @vtwin1979
      @vtwin1979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ankyspon1701
      It was god inspired was it not?
      And if you think it was written with memory relapses how can you take it as truth?
      Now you have just painted yourself into a corner.

    • @oneyearunder
      @oneyearunder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dude said that 4 days passed before the sun was formed, but pray tell, how would a day pass without light to denote the days passing? The sun was formed before the first day, while heaven and earth were created first, it was created to have a space to put things in, then the sun was made, then 3 verses later, the earth was formed
      When the earth was created, it was a ball of water, specifically mentioned to be formless

    • @TW-pk7lu
      @TW-pk7lu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@vtwin1979the same way you believe scientist. Faith.

  • @Judesmood118
    @Judesmood118 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Finally someone who is immune to Dinesh’s weaseling! Bravo Alex!

  • @Marcel-yu2fw
    @Marcel-yu2fw 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    There's (mostly) 2 possibilities: The universe had a beginning or it didn't. They had a 50% chance of guessing correctly.

    • @DJ-ct6so
      @DJ-ct6so 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It doesn't necessarily work like that. Consider this: "either some kind of god exists or he/she/it doesn't. You have a 50% chance of guessing correctly." Conclusion: We can't calculate probabilities for events that we don't fully understand.

    • @ajax201000
      @ajax201000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      ​@@DJ-ct6soThats a false equivalency. We know the universe objectively exists and therefore it either had a begining or it did not. God is not provable and is not supported by any data or science so it is not 50/50 whether he created the universe any more than saying that its 50/50 as to whether a magical otter made the universe.

    • @ajax201000
      @ajax201000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @Vergil512 Then that wouldnt be the God of the Christian faith but a sentient universe and those 2 things are not the same.

    • @drnanard9605
      @drnanard9605 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@Vergil512ah yes, the whole "I'm gonna redefine the whole concept of God so that it fits with what we know about science". Well, maybe God is actually the half-empty box of Cheerios that sits in my cupboard. Who knows!!

    • @CampCucumber
      @CampCucumber 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ajax201000do you think it was a 50/50 guess?

  • @ratatoskr9366
    @ratatoskr9366 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Omg that pause and cut to both of your faces was like a skit from the Office😂

  • @TXBuild
    @TXBuild 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    “And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.”
    ‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1‬:‭3‬-‭5‬

  • @jaegarbombs7297
    @jaegarbombs7297 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Dont forget the plants were created on day 3 before the sun that the plants need for photosynthesis

    • @0pp841
      @0pp841 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If God used a big bang explosion to create everything, then there would probably be some light and heat surrounding the planet before the sun got into it's position.

    • @JakeLentz
      @JakeLentz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      this is a lie he said let there be light first before plants, do your research

    • @vastabyss6496
      @vastabyss6496 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@JakeLentz it also states that the sun and moon were created on day 4. Where was the light coming from if not from the sun?

    • @tarfielarchelone2674
      @tarfielarchelone2674 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@JakeLentz sun doesn't exist until the 4th day oops lol

    • @mihaimitican7182
      @mihaimitican7182 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why do people assume that our understanding of science and we can argue with God that his ways of working doesn't make sense, ye it does not make sense for us... . Wise orthodox priests explained to me that the light on 1st day came from withing God and it was enough for all the universe, so that light could sustain plants untill God probably said that his light should not be our source of light and created big engines(Stars) with sustenable energy for millenias.

  • @zanido9073
    @zanido9073 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    "Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

    • @skpt516
      @skpt516 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not when the arms of the clock have fallen off

  • @MilwaukeeAtheists
    @MilwaukeeAtheists 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Also, dinesh doesnt realize that "in the beginning" is only in the greek. Εν αρχη. The Hebrew is better understood as "when god created..."

    • @ZachFish-
      @ZachFish- 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      How does that make sense for John 1:1?

    • @AurorXZ
      @AurorXZ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@ZachFish- The writer of John famously used the Septuagint translation for his prologue.

    • @ElusiveEel
      @ElusiveEel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ZachFish- Different authors with different voices. It's like comparing Deuteronomy 24 with Mark 10, they're obviously not from the same God.

    • @mauddib1761
      @mauddib1761 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From listening to a few different Hebrew translators, apparently in Genesis the plural "Gods" or variations like "powerful ones" are used. It was the later translations into other languages that changed it from Gods to God. I don't read Hebrew so I've no idea how accurate that is, but there are many translators who seem to agree that the plural is used a lot in Genesis in particular

    • @AurorXZ
      @AurorXZ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mauddib1761 I've heard the same occasionally online, but it incorrect. "Elohim" is used in the Priestly texts, but it is grammatically singular and functions as a concretized abstract plural (we see this used of other singular deities like Dagon as well). The overwhelming academic consensus is that "Elohim" is a singular figure in the narrative.

  • @Wackaz
    @Wackaz 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The conception of time for God is a different conception of time for us humans.

    • @BB-rh2ml
      @BB-rh2ml 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The Bible is written for human conception.

    • @Wackaz
      @Wackaz 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @BB-rh2ml Yes, but that doesn't negate the fact the conception of time for God is fundamentally different than that of humans, transcendentally speaking.

    • @BB-rh2ml
      @BB-rh2ml 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Wackaz Again, the Bible is written in a human’s conception of time not a God’s, therefore a Day in the Bible is 24 hours.

  • @sallymoore7415
    @sallymoore7415 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    I just love this young man we need more like him 🙏

    • @lotanerve
      @lotanerve 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So what are the stupid prayer hands for?

    • @odraciskatube7725
      @odraciskatube7725 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lotanerve its the universal call sign for atheist

    • @sallymoore7415
      @sallymoore7415 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lotanerve They are stupid Thank you Hands

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the more snark and semantical twists he uses, the more unserious and malicious i find him to be.
      he should ONCE attempt a steelman

    • @odraciskatube7725
      @odraciskatube7725 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue i think he did(soft steelman/remark) in the beginning of the debate. he even stood up, and his argument bordered on racism. something along the lines that allot of atheist are from Great-Britain and yes it was a stupendous moment. full debate.
      th-cam.com/video/UMKkX8qRHsw/w-d-xo.html

  • @bennettdeneghuedoeshits2950
    @bennettdeneghuedoeshits2950 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    Once you pull the thread, it all unravels.

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @andrewdouglas1963
      @andrewdouglas1963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The bible doesn't say the earth was created before the sun.
      And despite that, different cultures have different ways of listing things.
      For example in English, we would say "my eyes are blue" but in French they change the order to "blue are my eyes".
      Ancient cultures may have had different priorities for listing things.

    • @SuperNictastic
      @SuperNictastic 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andrewdouglas1963 LOL. Keep digging.

    • @andrewdouglas1963
      @andrewdouglas1963 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SuperNictastic
      ???
      Maybe this is too educationally advanced for you.

    • @TaylorL3
      @TaylorL3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@maambomumba6123 i’m trying to wrap my head around this too, so I’m an honest observer, but I would challenge you by saying, the genesis account is supposed to be the telling of things given by God. Do you believe that? If you believe that, I don’t think you can take the liberties you took in your answer above.

  • @RosieRoserules
    @RosieRoserules 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    This is the dude that was in court 4 weeks ago admitting he had zero evidence for his 2000 mules movie and now has to apologize for it remove it from distribution and is being sued for defamation from the people that he erroneously called mules

    • @scottythetrex5197
      @scottythetrex5197 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump won in 2020 .

    • @Lucasisonline2
      @Lucasisonline2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who??

    • @janeslater8004
      @janeslater8004 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Lucasisonline2not alex. The brown one dont know his name

    • @TiKallisti
      @TiKallisti 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Lucasisonline2 Dinesh D´Souza - the liar behind 2000 mules.

    • @Foulgaz3
      @Foulgaz3 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is 2000 mules? Why would a movie need recalled on the basis of a lack of evidence?

  • @jcb5942
    @jcb5942 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I cite poetry in my scientific studies.

  • @einsibongo
    @einsibongo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    The Hitch rising, Alex O'Connor, is outstanding, been following for years. Just gets better and better.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koschmx If you don't know then leave it there. You're clearly cherry picking. If seriously want to critique his response to the question, you should listen to the response.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koschmx It looks fine because its obvious that this is edited for time and to promote watching the full debate. Hence your comment makes no sense, unless you are cherry picking which you are.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koschmx If you want to know what parts were left out watch the damn thing. You're hung up on miniscule details of the editing and blowing them out of proportion when its obvious these are just sound bites to entice you into watching the ACTUAL DEBATE. You were openly arguing from your incredulity so yes, while poorly executed, you were being deceptive and continue to do so by denying it even though it is so blatantly obvious.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koschmx Yeah you don't care yet you argue. If you don't want to be informed on this specific topic thats fine but then why do you need to have fight so hard to justify your flawed reasoning? You could have just said ok and then move on, or not responded at all, but you CARED to do so. If you don't care then why do you care? By the way, the specific argument in this short was cut out and uploaded as a ten minuets long if time is your issue. Also, about your opinion on Gods, I didn't ask, don't matter. Never did I indicate that I wanted the information so way to show me how much you don't care. Whatever your stance is the point still stands that you are cherry picking aspects of the short to make it seem like it "makes him look bad" when in reality it's just a regular youtube short and nobody thinks that but you.

    • @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337
      @parcormasteryesiknowispell4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koschmx Now everyone who calls you out for blatantly making misinformed judgments is a "fanboy?" You don't want to waste an hour of your free time to properly educate yourself before opening your mouth but you'll spend MULTIPULL HOURS making excuses for a simple laps in judgment that you could have moved on from LITERAL days ago. If you don't care why do you care?

  • @ST0IC
    @ST0IC 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Theist: "My holy book is in alignment with modern science! It's a miracle!"
    Atheist: "Hold on, here is a scientific contradiction in it"
    Theist: "Well, it's not a science book!"
    What in the name of critical thinki- 🤦🏼‍♂️

    • @PicaMonedula
      @PicaMonedula 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most Christians around the western world dont take the old testament literally. That is something americans share with less developed countries.
      If you want an interesting debate dont debate fundamentalists be they religious or atheist. Its an easy way to feel smarter but its boring…
      Jesus was a stoic btw

    • @charliecinnella9090
      @charliecinnella9090 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Nice story. Did you make it up yourself?

    • @funnygaming2672
      @funnygaming2672 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you know that expert all around the world don't know /agree on how the universe started right !? im just impress that these religious people even knew the concept of outer space and creation with so little technologies,they not more wrong ...

    • @PicaMonedula
      @PicaMonedula 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its ironic that strawmen do not constitute prober critical thinking.

    • @praisephillips9459
      @praisephillips9459 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@funnygaming2672 yeah the origin of the universe is not known and has only been theorized...the formation of the solar system with the earth on the other hand has been deduced by observation and proven

  • @michaelbuick6995
    @michaelbuick6995 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The look on Alex's face of "dude are you fn serious right now?"

  • @ryancropper4784
    @ryancropper4784 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The interesting answer to the beginning of the universe is that the Big bang may have been the beginning of time.
    So if time didn't exist you can't say what was the universe like before the big bang as time potentially didn't exist.
    It would be like standing on the north pole and asking which way is north.

  • @duderyandude9515
    @duderyandude9515 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    "You can't now move the goalposts, especially if you're still going to miss" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @gregorymoore2877
      @gregorymoore2877 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As a Christian, that was a pretty good line. I'm not sure what's up with Dinesh here. I thought he was supposed to be a believer? It's like he's throwing the debate on purpose.

  • @okon7464
    @okon7464 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    When bible says something true:
    "Ohh wow, how could they know that, it has to be God who tell them that"
    When Bible says something untrue:
    "Oh no no, Bible isn't scientific text, you can't expect everything from it, it's obviously based on knowledge of people in that era"

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually we really don't know if the earth or the sun was formed first, for all it's possible earth was formed as a rogue planet and only later entered the solar system.

    • @okon7464
      @okon7464 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@AndrewJF we actually pretty sure know that sun was formed first

    • @AndrewJF
      @AndrewJF 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@okon7464 just like Einstein was pretty sure the universe was eternal?

    • @okon7464
      @okon7464 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@AndrewJF nuh, like we are sure that gravity exists

    • @vtwin1979
      @vtwin1979 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AndrewJF
      That’s just a theory.
      Not a fact. Are you trying say it’s a fact?

  • @DeadRoseBouquet
    @DeadRoseBouquet 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The awkward silence leading to stuttering was the funniest part

  • @christianmenendez7733
    @christianmenendez7733 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it…. 9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world”
    God was the light and the life for the first three days.

    • @billharnet
      @billharnet หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is also a great booster of incest , see Adam and Eve or Noah and family and everyone’s favorite Lot. Adulterous behavior, see Abraham and David, and cold blooded murder, see same guys

    • @Hoganply
      @Hoganply หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where in the first 3 did it say he was the light?

  • @myssadonno2759
    @myssadonno2759 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    The face After the 'got that bit wrong' 😂

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @myssadonno2759
      @myssadonno2759 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@maambomumba6123 so the light arrived before the Sun was visible? Where did the light Come from then?
      Also, that does not really conforme with this bit ''In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep''
      So it does seem the earth was created before light existed.
      Since ''let there be light'' Comes after.
      Are we Reading the same Book?

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@myssadonno2759 yes. It’s possible to see the light from a light source but not see the source itself.
      Genesis 1:2 “says darkness was upon the surface of the watery deep”. Evidently at this point, while the Sun had already been created, it’s light had not yet diffused through Earths atmosphere - hence the darkness. In the very next verse Genesis 1:3 says “let there be light”. It’s at this point in this creation epoch that light diffuses through the atmosphere of the Earth. But the Sun itself as the source of this light is not yet discernible. Only on the fourth creation day does the Sun itself become visible as the sky was evidently clear enough to see the Sun. That’s why Genesis 1:17 refers to “Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth”…describing how the Sun could now be seen by an observer on the Earths surface.

    • @myssadonno2759
      @myssadonno2759 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maambomumba6123 not for days or epoques. How long does it take for the suns light to get here?
      Also, do you believe they, the Sun and the earth, were created at the same Time? Or was one created before the other? You believe the earth is round right? So the source of the light would have been visible from half of the planet if there was already light when the earth was created...
      You also talked about it being the description of an observer, like a physical one?

    • @WhoThisMonkey
      @WhoThisMonkey 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Genuinely the mental gymnastics some people attempt to pull off, when trying to defend absurdities, never ceases to astound me.

  • @CastIronWarlock
    @CastIronWarlock 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    *clears throat* “let there be light”, boom, sun

    • @ooooothegreat
      @ooooothegreat 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      As opposed to *clears throat*
      And then 💥
      And then 🌌
      Yea, excuse me for doubting that an explosion can occur from nothing. “Crickets”, BOOM, EVERYTHING

    • @RRBBVamp
      @RRBBVamp 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Actually he created the sun, moon, and stars on a later day than he created light.

    • @zenor7787
      @zenor7787 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ooooothegreat The big bang is just a name, its not actually an explosion. Additionally, from what I understand at least, there is no proof of there being nothing before the big bang, it's just the earliest point we can trace the universe back to.
      I hope this clears up any misconceptions.

  • @dragonuv620
    @dragonuv620 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Alex is so open minded, even willing to talk with literal felons.

    • @TommyTombstone
      @TommyTombstone 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      How forgiving and tolerant of the atheists.

    • @filipedias7284
      @filipedias7284 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yo what happened

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ahhh the snark, assery, and flippant unseriousness of Alex's audience.

    • @MrTHEMONEEMAKER
      @MrTHEMONEEMAKER 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Guy makes a donation and you make him sound like mugger

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrTHEMONEEMAKER Because the actual violent felons are 95% atheists... so they have to strawman to cover for the destruction their lack of morals produces.
      It's also a fallacy.
      A personal attack is not an argument.

  • @louisroque157
    @louisroque157 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how these people trip over themselves whenever they’re confronted with somebody who has scientific knowledge

  • @lisakurak3733
    @lisakurak3733 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    When the Bible mentions light, it doesn't necessarily mean our sun.

    • @juliagooliagiulia723
      @juliagooliagiulia723 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Exactly!!!!

    • @JB-ec1bo
      @JB-ec1bo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What does it mean?

    • @hopisix8899
      @hopisix8899 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@JB-ec1bo "The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp" (Revelation 21) ..this scripture is about the new earth in the future. It parallels Genesis. God was the light & he created the sun and moon later to mark signs & times. This transcends science..it's supernatural.

    • @korpscomacho
      @korpscomacho 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      From genesis: And God made the two great lights-the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night-and the stars. And God set them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth, to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness.
      Now are you really going to try to rationalise that this doesn't mean the sun and the moon? :)

    • @hopisix8899
      @hopisix8899 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@korpscomacho That scripture was the 4th day. There was a source of light already in Genesis 1:3. No one in this section said verse 16 wasn't about the sun and the moon.

  • @johnjames9359
    @johnjames9359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you” - Werner Heisenberg, father of quantum physics

    • @mistere5857
      @mistere5857 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I don't know if he meant that how I interpret it, but it is a beautiful statement. I've heard more than one scientist say once they understood "X" they became theist. Insert any field you want into "X". Apparently once you see how intricate and fragile the building blocks of the universe are, you start to believe in a higher power.

    • @PierreLucSex
      @PierreLucSex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's entirely bs. Absolutely crushing intelligent minds have tackled metaphysics without resorting to such rhetoric nonsense.

    • @ARRAM57
      @ARRAM57 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That is pretty much the opposite of how things evolved in history. The first gulp of natural science was with the blessing of the church and religious scholars. Unfortunately when science began to contradict their holy book we found they were willing to imprison Galileo for suggesting the earth was not the centre of the universe.

    • @marismcmullen6023
      @marismcmullen6023 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@ARRAM57 that's not why Galileo was imprisoned. You should look into it. The real history is much more interesting

    • @guyr3618
      @guyr3618 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh man God is tiny

  • @amt4653
    @amt4653 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I love how Alex included a diagram that beautifully demonstrates how the 6 days of creation were not literal, and I dont think he knows it. Pause the video and notice how the top half mirrors the bottom half. It's a parallelism, which is a form of Hebrew poetry. It uses a song-like rhythm to reinforce the message being made. The second part completes the ideas introduced in the first part. The order of the creation events had to be molded to fit the style of poem, not the other way around.

  • @KaAlKyGood
    @KaAlKyGood หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is better than any sitcom I have seen this far.

  • @aboveman5321
    @aboveman5321 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Who else gets a little schadenfreude from this? It just makes me happy to see these arrogant people make fools of themselves in front of people like Alex.

    • @jsmit9484
      @jsmit9484 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It brings back a little of the "old school" new atheist fire. Exept Alex's debates have so much more depth than the Hitch, Harris, Dawkins debates.
      I hate that I love this, but I do.

    • @robertluechtefeld5017
      @robertluechtefeld5017 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The epitome of arrogance is to presume the religion of modern science can answer or at some point in the future can discover the answer to all the mysteries of the universe. When science creates something from nothing, or creates a single-celled living organism from amino acids, or proteins in a lab, I MIGHT lend them some "street cred"; until then, I'll keep my faith in the Triune God-head. Nice try, epic fail.

    • @jsmit9484
      @jsmit9484 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertluechtefeld5017 Just keep on moving the goalposts buddy

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @shambhav9534
      @shambhav9534 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertluechtefeld5017 No, maybe science all questions ever asked, but that doesn't mean we need to believe in a space wizard. The questions will go unanswered, I guess. That's better than making them up based on a dubious book.
      What do you mean by "something"? And what do you mean by "nothing". Assuming default meanings, yeah, happens all the time. We can measure this quantum fluctuation pretty easily too.
      And we'll get there with the single-celled living organism, I hope. We know the mechanism involved, and there's no reason to suspect it couldn't happen. Totally feasible, plus we have a ton of supporting evidence. It's only a matter of time.

  • @zcobryant
    @zcobryant 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I’ve watched this like 20 times over several days. I’m absolutely in awe that you setup each of these moments so perfectly and he fell for it every time. Like just asking “what day was it that god created the sun? Day four or something like that?” And it sets up the next moment perfectly.
    Bravo, Alex. This is one of the more perfect moments anyone has ever had on a debate stage.

    • @aztubmatt904
      @aztubmatt904 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Alex is being dishonest here the verses (gen 1:14-18) isn't refering to the moon and sun or they wouldve been named but time which creates periods utilising the light (photons) that was created on the first day simarly to what astrophysicts believe so please instead of taking this clip in 20x look for scholarly opinions that differ and explain in more detail what Alex is actually trying to talk about

    • @jdetres01
      @jdetres01 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ok then... aztubmatt904.... i cant wait to see you up there debating it next so we can all pause, look up your references and form our own conclusions in our own time like we do when (non coward) christians get up there to debate. 🙏🏽❤️

    • @aztubmatt904
      @aztubmatt904 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jdetres01 what are you on about its not my reference he used it im just stating how Alex's point has been echoed before and is objectively wrong and provide a counteractive view that IS correct

    • @John1samar
      @John1samar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      On day 1 God Created the Heavens and the Earth. Believe it or not the Sun is part of Earth. It's just burning up, it's a matter of flesh not divinity.
      Why are you all saying bravo and praising like you're robots? Does Alex pay for these comments?

    • @jdetres01
      @jdetres01 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aztubmatt904 you're debating in the comments, instead of preping for your upcoming debate. you had a month to prep, are you ready? i cant wait to watch and form my own opinions after looking into the things you say! :)

  • @ST0IC
    @ST0IC 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    The mental gymnastics and confirmation bias in these theistic arguments are insufferable 💀

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      not really. It's just hard to discuss things properly with self-centered materialists.

    • @kaylakaymorgan
      @kaylakaymorgan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue what a lame response lol....like a child who is butthurt: "yeah, well you're selfish so there"....

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@ithurtsbecauseitstrueThe people who are humbly accepting that the facts and realities of the universe are true, and the made up story that each of us is special and loved by the divine creator of the universe is what's NOT true, proves that religious people are the self centered ones. We don't live based on a belief that we'll get eternal paradise while everyone else burns bc we're so special. THAT is the definition of self centered, and you might want to look up what "True" means as well if you're gonna keep such a bogus profile name.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Matt-the-Wise since you have to strawman the position, you defeated nothing

    • @Matt-the-Wise
      @Matt-the-Wise 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ithurtsbecauseitstrue Add "straw man position" to your homework, bc you missed that one too. A straw man argument is utilizing a false equivalency in lieu of something to negate it. So if I had said "your response sounds exactly like what a Muslim would say to defend their faith, so you're no different" it would've been a straw man, but you just being wrong and not liking it doesn't qualify. Now get busy, you've obviously got quite a LOT of definitions to learn.

  • @jred201
    @jred201 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Body bag mode 😂

  • @masteroogway2853
    @masteroogway2853 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Alex has the best critiques, he eviscerates dumb arguments and respects strong ones

    • @markwildt5728
      @markwildt5728 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should remove your lips from Alex's ass and come up for air... Alex is simply your typical dime a dozen TH-cam atheist edgelord. Also, he dodged the question and deflected. He couldn't refute one argument, so he deflected to one he thought he could. Unfortunately Dinesh got rattled and handled it poorly, because if Dinesh would have stayed sharp, not fall for Alex's tactics, and pressed him on the original question, Alex would have come away looking rather foolish.

  • @smadaf
    @smadaf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    LOL! This was uncommonly good!
    (Now I have to think of Mr. Kipling and his exceedingly good cakes.)

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

    • @smadaf
      @smadaf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@maambomumba6123 , I suppose that you meant to comment on the video in general, not to reply to my comment.
      Still, now that I'm aware of your comment, I'll point one thing out: Genesis 1:14-19 _does_ say that God _made_ the sun, the moon, and the stars; and it places this _making_ on the fourth day. Your interpretation _is_ an interesting one; but it is an interpretation that reads into the text something that the text does not say. You began your comment by saying "The Genesis account of creation _doesn’t say_ the Sun was created after the Earth" (emphasis mine); the fact is that Genesis 1 puts the Earth there, formless and void, at the very beginning (verses 1 and 2), and waits until the third day has come and gone before it has God making the sun, the moon, and the stars. It _does_ do that. What it does _not_ do is say "And, on the fourth day, God took the _already existing_ sun and _moved_ it, from a place of invisibility, into _such a place that an observer on the surface of the Earth could see it."_

  • @arkafella1984
    @arkafella1984 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Alex I've been following your ascend since the beginning, you are one of the few or maybe the only one guy in youtube that i actually feel proud to support.

  • @ranbirsingh7666
    @ranbirsingh7666 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Iam sure there is more important topics to discuss than how the universe began…. All those Billions of years ago

    • @axel9473
      @axel9473 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm sure there is more important things to do then watching this video and commenting about it, and yet here we are...

    • @ranbirsingh7666
      @ranbirsingh7666 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ Yh - should have skipped it .. but hey can’t bring that time back again.. 🫣😅

  • @AlanZornOfficial
    @AlanZornOfficial 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Alex, have a bit of mercy please 😂

    • @billwalton4571
      @billwalton4571 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you mean have some common sense. He has no idea when the sun was created yet hes so sure of himself I got second hand embarrassment for him.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      or even an ounce of seriousness. that'd be nice.

    • @liamthomas2014
      @liamthomas2014 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@billwalton4571no one’s embarrassed for him. The earth was formed after the sun and we do know.

    • @billwalton4571
      @billwalton4571 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@liamthomas2014 you know like you know man came from apes 🤣🤡

    • @billwalton4571
      @billwalton4571 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@liamthomas2014 🤡

  • @photografr7
    @photografr7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The Bible only “knows” what the writers of the Bible knew at the time it was written. I tried to explain that to my 5th grade teacher, who was Catholic, but she wouldn’t have it, so she sent me to the principal’s office as punishment.

    • @clay07770
      @clay07770 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to presume God does not exist to come to that conclusion. 🤷‍♂️
      If there is a God, it would stand to reason He could reveal things as He sees fit. So once again, you assume what these people knew actually came from themselves.. Since you have an issue with the idea of God --- What if we are in a simulation, and the programmer decides at times to reveal things to His creation? Even things that seem impossible or improbable looking back billions of years -- which none of us can do.

    • @joestrat2723
      @joestrat2723 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Every religion is rainbows and lollipops until you question it. Then the knives come out.

    • @photografr7
      @photografr7 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@clay07770 There is no God and never was.

    • @clay07770
      @clay07770 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@photografr7 And that is your belief.
      Your atheism never was, and never will be.....
      So, are you just as convinced as I was!?
      If existence is infinite, WHY NOT God!?
      If the universe is not infinite... Who did it? Because it doesn't even make sense to assume nothing did it, since nothing would have existed to make existence exist... ;)
      Creation is all around you.. To think it wasn't designed is stupid. Look around your room of manufactured things.. Do they come about by chance? Yet you are more infinitely complex than the phone you hold, and assume yourself to be the accident!? Only if your parents didn't mean to conceive, haha....
      Absurd to think life is an accident, knowing full well we are agents of creation ourselves, to think a far greater creator than we can imagine, exists.
      Atheism requires faith... Faith in nothing to conceive everything.

  • @ryancook1078
    @ryancook1078 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    “God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day.” Genesis 1:5

    • @thecelestialvoyager
      @thecelestialvoyager 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Literal is nonsense

    • @akiblue
      @akiblue 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Meanwhile:
      She lusted after lovers with genitals as large as a donkey’s and emissions like those of a horse.
      Ezekiel 23:20

    • @geewanraghoo1520
      @geewanraghoo1520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      U are correct! Sun before earth!@

    • @akiblue
      @akiblue 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      And God created mankind. But he made a huge mistake, like omnipotent beings do sometimes, and instead of starting over when there were only two, he waited until they populated the earth with millions and then killed them all. But he knew it was going to happen, so either, it was that God is the dumbest omnipotent being there is, or that he's a sadist. The rest of the bible proves the second one is true.

    • @kaehlerfamily7251
      @kaehlerfamily7251 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@akiblue​ it is a interesting take.
      But I'd like you to consider this. God has always been and always will be. He is outside of time. He knows all. He is love. He is creative. He brings justice. The bible says he is perfect essentially.
      When you have a child, do you want them to explore and come to you and love you because they want/choose to love you, or do you want them to be like robots with no choice? If God is love like the bible states, he wants us to choose him, he doesn't want something fake. No one can love you if they didnt have a choice, they would almost be like an inanimate object, there because you put them there. We were made in his image, to love and be loved by him.
      I believe he made us out of evey idea we can think of and even more than we can imagine. Out of all the possibilities we were chosen because I believe we are the best option, nothing but God can be perfect. If we were perfect we would not need God. And then what would be the point of God creating us? If his creation did what they want seperate from him?

  • @THEREALAKRINIM
    @THEREALAKRINIM หลายเดือนก่อน

    To be fair, that's according to the scientific community who used to count pluto as a planet

  • @SimonPartogi-y8i
    @SimonPartogi-y8i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The book genesis clearly mention: "Let there be light!" as the first creation

    • @glara039
      @glara039 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interestingly enough it mentions earth twice. Heaven and earth in the beginning , then light and later on they again mention the division between water and dry land. John Lennox has a pretty good presentation about the seven days of creation that breaks it down very nicely.

    • @glara039
      @glara039 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Don’t know if it’s a bit of a reach but the first sentence of creation sounds a bit vague - it’s not like they go into detail - they just say earth and the heavens. And I mean that may very well just mean space and matter -

    • @stephante3519
      @stephante3519 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually, wherever is a good reader would read the Bible and know that the "light" (sun) was created on the first day not on the fourth day.
      Science can only discover what God has done. The gentleman is only trying to twist the scriptures to favor his argument. He's either a fraud or he's ignorant.

    • @sigmaman721
      @sigmaman721 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Light doesn't mean sun, there are many suns in space

    • @dr.science9505
      @dr.science9505 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah ...The father did not say ...not let there be the sun .This whole discussion was maximum stupid . How many other lights can you see and how many more can you not see. Very extremely stupid argument. What other type of light have our retarded arrogant scientists not discovered for man to even be able to see as of right this second.

  • @danielbriggz
    @danielbriggz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Everytime I remember how I was so enamored and captured by the likes of D'Souza and JP, I am deeply ashamed at younger me

    • @kinoko5566
      @kinoko5566 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Don't be ashamed, were just glad you saw the bs

    • @theintelligentmilkjug944
      @theintelligentmilkjug944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      JP seems leagues above D'Souza in terms of intelligence. As a Christian I've never heard of D'Souza , but his defense of the Bible is laughable bad here.

    • @flynnoflenniken7402
      @flynnoflenniken7402 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I still enjoy listening to Peterson when he's talking about psychology. It's just when he steps into politics or religion I have to take some of what he says with a grain of salt. I still don't disagree with everything he says though, just some things.

    • @ithurtsbecauseitstrue
      @ithurtsbecauseitstrue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You fell for the low-rent skeptical semantics of online atheists, huh?

    • @maambomumba6123
      @maambomumba6123 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Genesis account of creation doesn’t say the Sun was created after the Earth.
      The account is written from the perspective of an observer standing on the surface of the Earth. It tells you the order in which things became visually manifest; what could be seen in which creation epoch. The reference to God making the “two great luminaries for dominating the day and dominating the night” is pointing to what was happening visually. During the first day light diffuses through the atmosphere but its source could not yet be seen. Only until the fourth creation epoch did the Sun and the moon become discernible from the Earths surface.

  • @martinkuliza
    @martinkuliza 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "Surely Day 4 comes after Day 1 though"
    well... umm... well... it depends... i mean .. umm
    LMFAO , Bloody Classic

    • @jayrussell3796
      @jayrussell3796 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm pretty sure the first thing the bible said God did was say" Let there be light."....just a thought.

    • @martinkuliza
      @martinkuliza 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jayrussell3796
      Actually, You're not Correct.
      Let there be light WAS THE 2ND THING
      The 1st Thing was....
      "God Created the Heavens and the Earth"
      (Verse 1)
      when he did that
      - The earth was formless and dark
      - Then he said
      Let there be light (Verse 3)
      .... Just a thought :P

    • @jayrussell3796
      @jayrussell3796 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@martinkuliza Let me rephrase that....
      The first thing God said in the Bible was "Let there be light." He didn't say "Let me make earth." It also stands to reason that since it also states earth was without form and he created light first, that the sun was created first.
      Just another thought 😉

    • @martinkuliza
      @martinkuliza 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jayrussell3796
      LOL..... Yeah, i reckon you should rephrase it
      But see, You can't now change
      "What God did"
      to
      "What God said"
      1. That's a cop out
      2. I could still argue that god spoke the words to create the heavens and the earth
      3. He didn't Make earth
      HE MADE EVERYTHING
      But instead of going down this B.S. Road
      WHAT ARE YOU REALLY TRYING TO GET AT ?
      so Look
      1. Your point stuffed up ok
      COP IT ON THE CHIN AND LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKE
      2. Don't try and change your story and wriggle out of it. Because it was your responsibility to google it before you said it to ensure accuracy.
      You stuffed up.... JUST COP IT and admit it and we'll move on
      that's what we did in the 70s
      YOU MAKE MISTAKES , YOU LEARN.
      OK
      so cop it sweet
      Now... What are you getting at anyway ?
      You said this
      " It also stands to reason that since it also states earth was without form and he created light first, that the sun was created first.
      Just another thought 😉"
      OK, i like thoughts, i'll entertain this.
      1. Let's start by understanding this....
      FACT - The bible Absolutely is not god's word.
      So it's good that you did state
      "IN THE BIBLE IT SAYS"
      as opposed to
      "GOD SAID"
      2. Let's skip the without form part, because that a bunch of DogSh$##T Anyway
      let's get to the light thing
      LOL
      Well.....
      My God.. From Genesis 1 to Genesis 5, don't we have some stupid crap.
      I'm not even going to debate what came first AS A FACT
      But we can agree on this i think.
      The bible isn't god's word
      God (According to the bible) LOL... Creates Light on Day 1 and then again on Day 4
      LOL
      so you see if we debate it and you say
      he created light on Day 1
      I can say ... Naahh it was Day 4
      and we can debate it forever and we are both correct or.. Both incorrect
      and then the word "DAY"
      Allow me to show the first bit of the bible here
      Watch how dumb this is...
      "1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
      3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day."
      OK, now we know that THE DEFINITION OF 1 DAY IS
      - You need to have a Moon
      - You need to have a Sun
      - You need to have an Earth
      LOL... Ohh this is funny isn't it
      I mean, you know this part , right..
      so From Gen 1:1 to Verse 3 there is no sun that was created.
      So how did GOD Conclude this was called
      THE FIRST DAY
      Because on day 4 he creates light and the sun and the moon.
      So wouldn't day 4 be day 1
      THERE'S FOOD FOR THOUGHT
      How about Gen 1:2
      "Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters."
      WHERE THE HELL DID THE WATERS COME FROM ?
      Did he create THE HEAVENS and...
      the EARTH
      Now if someone argues. it's the planet
      then... Why later did he cause dry land to appear.
      so basically it's saying God created a waterworld, so to speak
      so why did he call it EARTH ?
      I mean we are 3 verses in LOL
      and look at how much stuff i can poke a stick at
      Now i don't wan't to bore you ,
      if you want to discuss this, i'm happy to do so and i'm an ordained Minister (no longer practising) but still, i was made to study this stuff for 4 years. so i know this stuff in and out
      But in a nutshell
      Gen 1 to Gen 5 is a joke
      but hey.. at the end of the day ,
      it's not God's word so really it's no reflection on god's character should he exist, right
      but yeah dude
      let me know if you want to have a chat and what about

  • @tacojoe4474
    @tacojoe4474 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He threw a spanner in Dinesh’s gearbox 😂