El Mirador Part 4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
  • La Danta

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @StarShippCaptain
    @StarShippCaptain 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm the 10,0001 viewer! El Mirador-will be a tourist destination as much as Egypt in days to come. Can't wait. Thanks for Richard Hansen's work.

    • @ave383
      @ave383 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately doesn't look seem like they've made much progress. I don't know what the hold up is

  • @healthwealthcentre
    @healthwealthcentre 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I find it all very interesting

  • @abycamel8359
    @abycamel8359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good job sir

  • @oledevo
    @oledevo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who are those two people? Investors?

  • @celaine8088
    @celaine8088 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol, i never saw/heard that, :) good to know!

  • @robertburrismma
    @robertburrismma 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pretty amazing

  • @gforce257
    @gforce257 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    maybe they weren't gypsies that took the artifacts, but some spiritual people that wanted to remove some messages to keep safe from those who wanted to destroy them. It seems that this new team is pretty well doing the same thing now.

  • @ave383
    @ave383 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does he mean by there was a little band of gypsies?

  • @lefthorse1
    @lefthorse1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait wait wait, 4 : 50 minute , there was precision cut megalithic stones below the primitive small stones, why dont mention that ? i see a megalithic platform with a primitive structure on top

  • @lefthorse1
    @lefthorse1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All this place show traces of the great flood what cover with 30 meter of mud the all area

  • @mytime103
    @mytime103 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    There are the Inca stones with dinosaurs on them.Could it be possible the ppl who built these pyramids had tame dinosaurs to do the heavy work.

  • @CrispyFrenFry
    @CrispyFrenFry 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lame. If people want proof they claim are not provided in this video Gould just go and make the effort to read the books containing the proof they seek. This anthropologist was acting as a curator to non specialist who may not have the same amount of knowledge as a specialist. Once you read their scholarly work, then anyone who isn't convinced can point out how the specialist's data is flawed. Otherwise, objections without any data are nothing less than empty.