Menger's Theorem - 13

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @A82653
    @A82653 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I got confuse if I read book about Menger's Theorem. But this video makes it simple to understand. Thanks

  • @Poojanthaker
    @Poojanthaker 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To the point, clean, precise video, great explanation. Helped a lot.

  • @kuzaxe
    @kuzaxe 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video! Love the cleanliness of the explanation.

  • @ekleanthony7997
    @ekleanthony7997 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video.. very intuitive. Thanks

  • @anstjd_ys
    @anstjd_ys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation

  • @pranjalpatil9659
    @pranjalpatil9659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    another min max relationship I can think of is König’s theorem for bipartite graph.

  • @sifou7974
    @sifou7974 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much

  • @vasilpetrov547
    @vasilpetrov547 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Danke!

  • @cladelpino
    @cladelpino 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video! Thanks ! I'm in need of implementing the algorithm to actually locate the minimal separators set of the whole graph (not just s-t). It is my understanding that this can be done by doing the s-t procedure for all possible vertex pairs and then looking at the minimal sets that arise from that. Then I'm need of implementing the s-t procedure. Now, I get that all possible paths can be found easily by solving "max flow" s-t, and I do it with matlab, but I'm curious about getting the maximally vertex independent sets of paths. I understand, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-vertex-connected_graph#Computational_complexity that this can be acheived by doubling the vertex in some way, but I'm not able to figure it out on my own. Any advice ?

  • @dragovern
    @dragovern 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Oh man, I came here looking for a proof. However, your work is great.

    • @graphtheoryforeducators3265
      @graphtheoryforeducators3265  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! The proof would be a little more complicated but maybe I'll add it one day.

  • @Vagasvic
    @Vagasvic 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    where can I find the references that states the theorem you used? it is in 6:00.

  • @Khilawan27
    @Khilawan27 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @dimitrisdimitriou6969
    @dimitrisdimitriou6969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video big thanks!

  • @asimyousaf3352
    @asimyousaf3352 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent..!!!

  • @stelpveri4679
    @stelpveri4679 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great. Thank you.
    How did you quickly get that the size of the minimum v1-v5 separating set is 2? In other words, how can you find the separating vertices (here v4 and v10) as fast as possible? Should you check all the vertices one by one?

    • @lukasschlacher5221
      @lukasschlacher5221 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty late answer, i know, but maybe it helps others. It's fairly easy in his examples. Notice that the size of the minimum seperating set has to be

  • @putriafebriana
    @putriafebriana 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks

  • @noegnoes
    @noegnoes 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice explanation!

  • @thisisfabre
    @thisisfabre 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice clean explanation ! :D

  • @ilyabezdetko9227
    @ilyabezdetko9227 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bravo - very nice and intuitive explanation!
    BTW I would be careful with showing a path of the file that contains your username ;)

  • @abdulmagedkhaled9480
    @abdulmagedkhaled9480 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    big like

  • @karishmazsweblog5561
    @karishmazsweblog5561 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome (Y)

  • @Guivarpa27
    @Guivarpa27 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thx a lot dude

  • @korneldavid3415
    @korneldavid3415 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like ha te is szopsz a bsz2 vizsgával és azért tévedtél ide :(