@@davidanalyst671 Somewhat most of these quick takes are based on how dense new information be conveyed about disruptive technology or what not to a mass that can understand half of what is said. BBC for one has been doing this since the seventies with science , gadget or new food industries. If you're young and from this era its natural it speaks to you in the way one can expect of current times. That is journalism still.
Thats what I was thinking, a week after the audio of lubin talking about helping whales accumulate as much ETH as they wanted in the premine, anonymously, hes the first guy here
No they are not solving complex computer problems. They are trying to guess a hash checksum by computational brute force by consuming high amounts of electricity.
Right? They say this because they believe that people cant understand. Its like They're trying to decode the rosetta stone. Except the rosetta stone is more complex and meaningless... There.
I often tell people that Crypto is the "Scientology" of currency: Lots of mumbo-jumbo, tons of true-believers, and a handful of people getting extremely rich.
Proof of Stake vs Proof of Work, tldr proof of work uses lot of electricity, proof of stake gives you more of a coin the more you stake it, uses a lot lot less of electicity.
influence =/= control. There has never been a system of money in the history of the world without outside influence. Even the US government can't stop outside influence on the economy. The goal (which has been achieved) is to remove CONTROL. In fiat currencies, the people who influence the economy can also shut it down if were to benefit them. (see: bank runs)
I've never been to a Federal Reserve conference or literally any bank, but I bet you'll find more cult-like people there. Remember, people from cults aren't willing to look at anything that may insist that their current system is somehow flawed.
I love the complete use of random clips and fast talking without actually saying anything. Love the obnoxious music the jokes the complete lack of professionalism. Beautiful piece terrible reporting and horrible editing.
There was a lot of information packed in here to introduce you to crypto. Seems like a lot of it just went over your head, maybe because it is too tightly packed in.
@@Jimsimi I'd rather say this video was probably intentionally made to illustrate how blockchain hype always worked by drowning unprepared minds with this flow of terms selected to sound technological and futuristic.
I believe it would be difficult to create a revolutionary decentralised system that can replace the functions of todays financial institutions without the two becoming very similar. It might alleviate some inefficiencies, but the end product will probably not be decentralised at all.
See, people like you think that nerds are trying to replace the real world. We still love the real world, it's just pretty bleak and we like somewhere else to go to. If you have a problem with that, then maybe direct some of your hostility to politicians who destroyed the economy and the economic system and made it so it works for them and against us. They truly deserve some of your energy on how ironic they have been. I promise you, there is a lot of material for you to review.
As a consumer, if I were to say, “this sounds great, I want it” what EXACTLY do I get? I’m not doubting the importance of any of these developments but goodness knows I’m none the wiser for watching this facile video!
What a terrible video with collection or random sentences. Was it created by a teenager on a smartphone? Shame on Bloomberg for such a low quality material.
I know there are already companies trying to sell tokenization as a service for verification purposes (essentially turning real world items into NFTs traceable on the blockchain) to prevent knockoff products from circulating. Imagine a gucci purse that can be scanned with your smartphone via RFD. Tokenized assets for things like like drone verification that meet FAA standards (essentially a token that functions as a license plate) are already developed on-chain too. These technologies seem hugely relevant to the future, regardless to the price of any one token. Looking further forward, think about something like sanctions through the lens of crypto. Currently sanctions often face retaliation, but think about if a sanction came from not from a nation state, but from a crypto governance panel (DAO). How much less effective would it be for a nation to try to retaliate against a decentralized everywhere?
Blockchains are permissionless, no one can sanction you, a DAO is just a set of smart contracts to control token issuance for specific goals, and so is a niche application that does not control the blockchain
How to I demonstrate my ownership to have a physical product tokenized into the blockchain? Who gives them the authority to do the authentication? How to demonstrate a physical item is unique and authentic? Do you like, hash the item's quantum wave function?
For me at the end banks will control this for the majority of the people, people does not want to take the rssponsability about loosing their money by loosing a password or downloading a malware, etc. So the banks will bring security for them.
@@ivanosalazar So, you think the classical banking system is safe? I dont know you, but when banks collapsed, I never saw common people's money being returned. Yes for sure there will be some mediators for people who do not understand it. But it beats the purpose of block chain.
@@ivanosalazar Quick question for you. What is safe about fiat currency? It has no intrinsic value. Its value is constantly and intentionally being depreciated. Crypto and blockchain brings decentralized finance. It can not be manipulated by governments and banks, like the fiat money. If banks control the entirety of crypto-market then crypto is de-facto the same thing with fiat money.
@@aguven I agree, and I think that crypto specially coins that can not be printed as the fed wants or deflationary ones are way better than fiat, but what I am saying is that banks will evolve and they will hold cryptos for the majority of people.
Cryptocurrency, as it exists now, does not function as an effective currency. It is too volatile to use as a store of value. Transaction speed is too slow for practical use, as is demonstrated by the lack of retailers that accept it. The amount of energy used per each transaction renders it unscalable. The hardware waste generated by it make the long term prospects for it very poor. Overall, this video seems to gloss over any real concerns in the pursuit of sensational coverage of the subject with absolutely no substance or real information.
@@nathanbustamante1479 Stablecoins, as they exist, are little better than a ponzi scheme given the demonstrable unreliability of their issuers and backers.
@@mateosabando Contact me when I can perform a transaction with the same efficiency, speed, and protection of a wire transfer or credit card transaction
@@TheRustyLM this is like Web 1.0 , you can heard same kind of blowhards as back in the day web2.0 was more civilized , I guess if there will be , crypto 2.0 will be somewhat useful
How is bitcoin democratizing if you now need huge farms of computers that cost 15k a piece? That doesn't seem accessible at all. Genuine question here, I'm an EE student but I can't wrap my head around this part of it.
Those are miners, they get paid by processing transactions. Instead, look up how much it costs to actually write a piece of information/transaction into the blockchain (e.g. Gas in Ethereum). That'd be even more difficult to wrap your head around...
@@deep.space.12 It seems to me like blockchain and cryptocurrency is quickly becoming something that only big corporations has control over. Exactly what we dislike about banks.
The average person doesn't need to mine, however mining is essential so someone should do it and they get compensated for it. Crypto is democratic because users make up the rules not an oversight regulatory agency
Blockchain is a ledger, and a potentially effective one, but it is not a currency. I don't pay bills with bank statements. If I can't pay my bills in the same currency I get paid in, it's friction that requires an exchange through a regulated entity. We've had the ability to make a global currency for decades, and there are realistic reasons why we have not that blockchain enthusiasts continue to ignore.
Thanks for the analysis! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
Scammers 3.0. I don’t know why people would trust increased financialisation when that’s what’s caused so much of the problems in the economy in the first place.
@@Dschinghiss "Supply Chain Management ", that is the most vague answer ever, SCM is a very broad subject, inventory, logistics, scheduling, security, you said absolutely nothing with your answer. Please tell us an actual use case e.g. "Cloud services like AWS offer small companies a way to host software without having to build/own physical server infrastructure. Companies can pay-per-usage". Please be more specific!
Right now crypto is for geeks. Mainstreamers can buy some coins but with web 3.0 most norms won’t get it because it’s up to the individual to put in the work to learn how to put ones money to work.
When it comes to the world of investment, most people don't know where to start. Fortunately, great investors of the past and present can provide us with guidance
Personally as a first time investor, i started trading with Mrs Sharon Laura with $1,000 now my portfolio is worth $5,400 within the space of few months trading with her
Even though DeFi poses a threat to finance i believe the benefits outweighs the risks. You just have to chose right project to work with. For spot trading, lending and borrowing services i work with and trust Unilend finance they do an amazing job.
Nice video very engaging from the beginning to the end. Nevertheless putting our time and effort in activities and investments that will yield a profitable return in the future is what we should be aiming for.
Speaking of investments, I have been finding a tough time deciding between mutual funds, real estate, and crypto investments, anyone with ideas to help me with?
To the best of my knowledge, "min[ing] the largest share" is insufficient to control the network. You don't need to just do more than anyone else individually, you need more than everyone else put together, i.e. an absolute majority: >50%. On your own. While this is a potential problem, it is my understanding that such a feat is practically infeasible on any coin with a large enough following to be viable. (With the possible exception of coins that were specifically designed for their creator to control them.)
Massively decentralized... my arse. Who runs the blockchain? 51+% processing power is owned by how many companies? Do you access the blockchain directly? If not, practically through how many company's API's can you access it?
WOOHOO!! Question to ask yourself. How old are you now? If the average lifespan is 70 years how many years until you reach 70? Divide this number by weeks in a year and multiply that by the number of years you have left. That is how many weekends you probably have left on this earth! Cheers!
After this video im still not sold of the idea of decentralized. If crime committed who's gonna be responsible plus the framework is just not there at least for this moment.
Thanks for the analysis! 🔍 I wanted to ask something unrelated: 🤔 I have these words 🤨. (behave today finger ski upon boy assault summer exhaust beauty stereo over). Can someone explain what this is? 😅
"Web 3.0 means taking the ideas of Web 1.0 and solidifying them"???? What kind of nothingness / meaningless statement is that. Wow, We are in a bubble and it will burst soon. I'll invest in the ones survive.
I'm a fan of Bloomberg Quicktake, this literally watches like it was made by high schoolers
@@davidanalyst671 Somewhat most of these quick takes are based on how dense new information be conveyed about disruptive technology or what not to a mass that can understand half of what is said. BBC for one has been doing this since the seventies with science , gadget or new food industries. If you're young and from this era its natural it speaks to you in the way one can expect of current times. That is journalism still.
What would you add to make it more comprehensive?
Great point, let's see your video version of this... what don't have one or can't make one? lol!
Agreed ...its all hyping and raving without actually explaining anything.
@@mpolo17those likes gotta be bots cuz what even were you trying to say here? 😭
Bruh, these people have never seen a line of code in their life and they are here talking about digitalization. Unreal.
Thats what I was thinking, a week after the audio of lubin talking about helping whales accumulate as much ETH as they wanted in the premine, anonymously, hes the first guy here
How'd you know they haven't seen a line of code?
Isn’t that the whole point? Like it was said in this piece, people won’t trust it for that exact same reason
"Monetary system hasn't changed for centuries" Gal never heard of Bretton Woods? And they are here talking about changing how money works.
No they are not solving complex computer problems. They are trying to guess a hash checksum by computational brute force by consuming high amounts of electricity.
Right? They say this because they believe that people cant understand.
Its like They're trying to decode the rosetta stone. Except the rosetta stone is more complex and meaningless... There.
I often tell people that Crypto is the "Scientology" of currency: Lots of mumbo-jumbo, tons of true-believers, and a handful of people getting extremely rich.
Proof of Stake vs Proof of Work,
tldr proof of work uses lot of electricity, proof of stake gives you more of a coin the more you stake it, uses a lot lot less of electicity.
Crazy.
It's not decentralised. The people with the most crypto who influence the markets are just completely invisible and unaccountable.
influence =/= control. There has never been a system of money in the history of the world without outside influence. Even the US government can't stop outside influence on the economy. The goal (which has been achieved) is to remove CONTROL. In fiat currencies, the people who influence the economy can also shut it down if were to benefit them. (see: bank runs)
the blockchain is decentralised... doesnt matter who owns the coins . blockchain is way bigger than just crypto tokens
These Miami conference cryptos sound like cult members 🤣🤣
I've never been to a Federal Reserve conference or literally any bank, but I bet you'll find more cult-like people there. Remember, people from cults aren't willing to look at anything that may insist that their current system is somehow flawed.
I love the complete use of random clips and fast talking without actually saying anything. Love the obnoxious music the jokes the complete lack of professionalism. Beautiful piece terrible reporting and horrible editing.
this is by far one of the worst videos I've ever seen from Quicktake
There was a lot of information packed in here to introduce you to crypto. Seems like a lot of it just went over your head, maybe because it is too tightly packed in.
Chill buddy
@@Jimsimi it was buzz words. Alot of empty sentences
@@Jimsimi I'd rather say this video was probably intentionally made to illustrate how blockchain hype always worked by drowning unprepared minds with this flow of terms selected to sound technological and futuristic.
I believe it would be difficult to create a revolutionary decentralised system that can replace the functions of todays financial institutions without the two becoming very similar. It might alleviate some inefficiencies, but the end product will probably not be decentralised at all.
BINGO!
It’s not just some efficiencies, it’s about creating a trustless system that transacts without involving mediaries
More or less
We made it in the video! Skip to 19:50
Lets gooo 🔥
The Best 💪
Awesome 🔥
LFGGGG 🔥🔥
PNFT 🔥
Is this a 24 minute video filled from start to end with BuzzWords?
how ironic. these metaverse believers actually prefer to gather and meet in person in a physical place
seriously
What’s wrong with doing both? I enjoy VR meets and I also enjoy meeting people in really life
See, people like you think that nerds are trying to replace the real world. We still love the real world, it's just pretty bleak and we like somewhere else to go to. If you have a problem with that, then maybe direct some of your hostility to politicians who destroyed the economy and the economic system and made it so it works for them and against us. They truly deserve some of your energy on how ironic they have been. I promise you, there is a lot of material for you to review.
"Metaverse believers"
Microsoft Facebook and twitter seem to believe in it
Warning, who ever holds the most bitcoin can start loaning out. All of the sudden you got firms hoarding bitcoin. And you have a bitcoin bank
Why is this a bad thing?
@@luisbranger1133 it betrays the "decentralized" principle of cryptocurrencies ?
It already exists. Not necessarily bitcoins, but using smart contracts to process loans basically puts an interest rate on crypto.
As a consumer, if I were to say, “this sounds great, I want it” what EXACTLY do I get?
I’m not doubting the importance of any of these developments but goodness knows I’m none the wiser for watching this facile video!
As a consumer you get much higher returns on your savings and faster international transactions.
@@skulitom great. Where do I sign up? 🤷🏻♂️
You can become the middle man and make money off transaction fees. This is through a process called Liquidity Pool Providing.
@@sesetio338 You'll also get much higher apr/apy rates depending on which exchange, defi app, protocol. It all depends on your risk really.
@@pcparadox5042 I understand the difference between those two the issue is I don't understand what benefits what.
What a terrible video with collection or random sentences. Was it created by a teenager on a smartphone? Shame on Bloomberg for such a low quality material.
It’s called vaporware brah
I wish I could see the dislikes so I could know this was a bad video before wasting 6 minutes of my life to find out.
same
@isle9 where?
@@ReyZar666 Vanced TH-cam app for android
RETURN DISLIKE extension for browsers.
I’m NOT the arguing the effectiveness of Blockchain, it’s most definitely the future. But all this hype does scare me a lot.
Thats not the future
Every new tech has this perspective
Me too
Scared is the problem. Life.
Blockchain hype will break at one point. After that, the technology will be utilized where it's needed.
Pump Pump Pump the shitcoin!
I know there are already companies trying to sell tokenization as a service for verification purposes (essentially turning real world items into NFTs traceable on the blockchain) to prevent knockoff products from circulating. Imagine a gucci purse that can be scanned with your smartphone via RFD. Tokenized assets for things like like drone verification that meet FAA standards (essentially a token that functions as a license plate) are already developed on-chain too. These technologies seem hugely relevant to the future, regardless to the price of any one token.
Looking further forward, think about something like sanctions through the lens of crypto. Currently sanctions often face retaliation, but think about if a sanction came from not from a nation state, but from a crypto governance panel (DAO). How much less effective would it be for a nation to try to retaliate against a decentralized everywhere?
Blockchains are permissionless, no one can sanction you, a DAO is just a set of smart contracts to control token issuance for specific goals, and so is a niche application that does not control the blockchain
How to I demonstrate my ownership to have a physical product tokenized into the blockchain? Who gives them the authority to do the authentication? How to demonstrate a physical item is unique and authentic? Do you like, hash the item's quantum wave function?
For me at the end banks will control this for the majority of the people, people does not want to take the rssponsability about loosing their money by loosing a password or downloading a malware, etc. So the banks will bring security for them.
Based on this comment I can say you probably do not understand how blockchain works
@@aguven basically you don understand that most of the people don't care about financial independence they care about being safe.
@@ivanosalazar So, you think the classical banking system is safe? I dont know you, but when banks collapsed, I never saw common people's money being returned. Yes for sure there will be some mediators for people who do not understand it. But it beats the purpose of block chain.
@@ivanosalazar Quick question for you. What is safe about fiat currency? It has no intrinsic value. Its value is constantly and intentionally being depreciated. Crypto and blockchain brings decentralized finance. It can not be manipulated by governments and banks, like the fiat money. If banks control the entirety of crypto-market then crypto is de-facto the same thing with fiat money.
@@aguven I agree, and I think that crypto specially coins that can not be printed as the fed wants or deflationary ones are way better than fiat, but what I am saying is that banks will evolve and they will hold cryptos for the majority of people.
So much vapor that sounds like the beanie baby craze of the 1990s, just insane
and whats up with the half life sfx at 9:53
Cryptocurrency, as it exists now, does not function as an effective currency. It is too volatile to use as a store of value. Transaction speed is too slow for practical use, as is demonstrated by the lack of retailers that accept it. The amount of energy used per each transaction renders it unscalable. The hardware waste generated by it make the long term prospects for it very poor.
Overall, this video seems to gloss over any real concerns in the pursuit of sensational coverage of the subject with absolutely no substance or real information.
Your comment acts as if stablecoins dont exist...
All the issues you mention are being worked on. with solutions already found. The crypto space is constantly evolving.
@@nathanbustamante1479 Stablecoins, as they exist, are little better than a ponzi scheme given the demonstrable unreliability of their issuers and backers.
@@mateosabando Contact me when I can perform a transaction with the same efficiency, speed, and protection of a wire transfer or credit card transaction
@@casacara LOL. Yeah USDC totally isn’t an audited American company? Did you just make that up!?
"I tend to believe the latter." Facts!
What do you think will be the biggest impact from Web 3.0? Or is it mostly hype?
Hype.
Shitcoin.
Crapto
Listen to these people. Sound like the old Amway cult. 😵💫😵💫😵💫
@@TheRustyLM this is like Web 1.0 , you can heard same kind of blowhards as back in the day web2.0 was more civilized , I guess if there will be , crypto 2.0 will be somewhat useful
Web3 will usher in the migration to an all-digital and highly automated global economic system built upon the the internet.
Not much hype. And the hype that does exist is mostly justified. This will be like going from 1.0 to 2.0. lots of fud.
Biggest impact will be more meaningless buzzword journalism by bloomberg. This is the emptiest video you made so far. What a shame
How is bitcoin democratizing if you now need huge farms of computers that cost 15k a piece? That doesn't seem accessible at all. Genuine question here, I'm an EE student but I can't wrap my head around this part of it.
Those are miners, they get paid by processing transactions.
Instead, look up how much it costs to actually write a piece of information/transaction into the blockchain (e.g. Gas in Ethereum). That'd be even more difficult to wrap your head around...
@@deep.space.12 It seems to me like blockchain and cryptocurrency is quickly becoming something that only big corporations has control over. Exactly what we dislike about banks.
@@mohi0ne306 how so what? I asked a question
@@mohi0ne306 “if you now need huge farms of computers that cost 15k a piece” right there in the beginning of my comment buddy
The average person doesn't need to mine, however mining is essential so someone should do it and they get compensated for it. Crypto is democratic because users make up the rules not an oversight regulatory agency
Blockchain is a ledger, and a potentially effective one, but it is not a currency. I don't pay bills with bank statements. If I can't pay my bills in the same currency I get paid in, it's friction that requires an exchange through a regulated entity. We've had the ability to make a global currency for decades, and there are realistic reasons why we have not that blockchain enthusiasts continue to ignore.
This 👆🏻exactly
Thank you quicktake for this.
Crypto folks still benchmark the value of their holdings against the US dollars.
Don't you see the irony?
Not for long. Lightning is here. Satoshis will be the measurement.
Nothing of meaning was said in this video
2:35 gal never heard of the Bretton Woods agreement? Literally living under a rock.
For as big as ETH is, most people who play around in DEFI avoid it because of the gas fees. There are far quicker and cheaper L1 platforms.
Multivac is my favorite L1 but pretty much nobody knows of it yet. Much better tech than ETH
@@puffpuffpass3214 I feel like could pick any other L1 and it would be better than ETH. I like HBAR. Not Blockchain, but hashgraph.
This didn’t age well.
DeFi is the future
Dreamer reppin DFK 😍😍
Thanks for the analysis! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
The days of greedy banks are numbered.
Most people in crypto want to be rich only a small percentage are in for the tech and innovation.
I am in for the money.
I honestly trust my government more than these nameless "software" guys.
-Software Guy
First guy is being investigated by the sec… lol
I see Crypto is more of a " catalyst " than as a " replacement " of Finance though.....🤔 Or is it just me ?
R.I.P CB!!
replaces the financial backend
Just you
Financial institution as blockbuster and crypto is Netflix. We all know what happened to blockbuster
Scammers 3.0. I don’t know why people would trust increased financialisation when that’s what’s caused so much of the problems in the economy in the first place.
Ripple Labs is the heart of DeFi .. Everyone can afford XRP , transact XRP , & this makes XRP the IN YOUR FACE BITCOIN / ETHER KILLER ..
intro song name please
They explained so cleanly
Still waiting for a problem that only crypto can take care of.
If you want a completely open system where every transaction is public information, crypto is what you need.
supply chain management and and anti counterfeit measures are already done through NFTs by big companies like BMW and Louis Vuitton.
@@ReddoFreddo Huh. Perhaps the stock market should be based on that kind of tech. So that nobody can hide their insider dealings and such.
@@ReddoFreddo if everything is public information, isn’t that the most unsecure thing on the planet? Why would you democratize your wealth?
@@Dschinghiss "Supply Chain Management ", that is the most vague answer ever, SCM is a very broad subject, inventory, logistics, scheduling, security,
you said absolutely nothing with your answer. Please tell us an actual use case e.g. "Cloud services like AWS offer small companies a way to host software without having to build/own physical server infrastructure. Companies can pay-per-usage". Please be more specific!
Mpesa invented in Kenya 🇰🇪 is where bitcoin came from. Bitcoin is just the 'west' version of Mpesa.
Just how reliable are these smart contracts? Like any technology they are fallible.
Right now crypto is for geeks. Mainstreamers can buy some coins but with web 3.0 most norms won’t get it because it’s up to the individual to put in the work to learn how to put ones money to work.
this a 30 minute show, how is this a quicktake?
When it comes to the world of investment, most people don't know where to start. Fortunately, great investors of the past and present can provide us with guidance
Personally as a first time investor, i started trading with Mrs Sharon Laura with $1,000 now my portfolio is worth $5,400 within the space of few months trading with her
A friend that i referred to her from UK just received €9,005 profit after 14 days of trading just jealous ASF LOL
bot
Even though DeFi poses a threat to finance i believe the benefits outweighs the risks. You just have to chose right project to work with. For spot trading, lending and borrowing services i work with and trust Unilend finance they do an amazing job.
anyone else see some irony in a Bloomberg-created crypto doc
I think energy intensive solutions of contemporary problems is best way to make sustainable present and future
When there's a crypto rush don't sell bitcoin sell RUSH tshirts
That's crazy greetings from PERU
this video made me feel like my phobe alarm was going off with the background music at parts.
that Brock guy is why some people hate crypto
Timestamp please
Omg!! Just go to 20:55 and you will love the next 60 seconds. 😂😂😂
thanks for the video
No transaction fees LOL
Awesome! Thank you :)
Defi is "full service shadow banking with nobody in charge". Or - trustless, permissionless, autonomous. Sign me up.
Nice video very engaging from the beginning to the end. Nevertheless putting our time and effort in activities and investments that will yield a profitable return in the future is what we should be aiming for.
Yeah. 😐
A great work demands a great sacrifice.
Nothing comes easy unless we really strive for it
Success usually comes to those who are busy looking for it.
Speaking of investments, I have been finding a tough time deciding between mutual funds, real estate, and crypto investments, anyone with ideas to help me with?
XRP 📈📈
10:00 nirnroot?
What about chia?
agree with Mark Whitehouse
long live crypto, gave me an opportunity to get on my feet.
Coloring of the video was definitely off.
ABSOLUTELY, ŸÊÃ!✊🏼
Those mine the largest share eventually control the network what's the point of decentralized.
To the best of my knowledge, "min[ing] the largest share" is insufficient to control the network. You don't need to just do more than anyone else individually, you need more than everyone else put together, i.e. an absolute majority: >50%. On your own. While this is a potential problem, it is my understanding that such a feat is practically infeasible on any coin with a large enough following to be viable. (With the possible exception of coins that were specifically designed for their creator to control them.)
The Defi 2.0 project on Ethereum layer 2
You gave up your freedom when you took that cell phone now they own you no matter what wallet you have or have not
I'm here for the bloomberg quicktake a e s t h e t i c
bunch of salty old men discrediting a technology that will replace most of them lol
I am thinking to bring a decentralization revolution in my country
It should be from Bitcoin to Bitcoin.
Sounds like they want to create buffers to limit risk in Crypto investment.
I learned nothing there
This is not folding@home, hon. Solving these "increasingly complex computer problems" doesn't actually solve anything.
This didn't age well
"shiba inu community wants robinhood listing has called on robinhood to list the token for months now"
Massively decentralized... my arse. Who runs the blockchain? 51+% processing power is owned by how many companies? Do you access the blockchain directly? If not, practically through how many company's API's can you access it?
You should see what proof of stake is. It will answer your questions
most of this did not make any sense
U guys are the best in media 👍🏼
So the rich can afford more mining equipment gets richer? and those who cant afford mining equipment gets poorer? how is this decentralize?
WOOHOO!! Question to ask yourself. How old are you now? If the average lifespan is 70 years how many years until you reach 70? Divide this number by weeks in a year and multiply that by the number of years you have left. That is how many weekends you probably have left on this earth! Cheers!
Guy at 17:35 looks like old version of BigHead.
It will be interesting how far governments will achieve regulation
Amen and hallelujah, ŸÊÃ!✊🏼
bitcoin does not give "financial mobility"
Horrible times of psychopaths coming
After this video im still not sold of the idea of decentralized. If crime committed who's gonna be responsible plus the framework is just not there at least for this moment.
it is there and it is working what do you mean ?
I absolutely should follow ya. Hope to see your thought on the Streeth next time. Your idea is the only thing I'm waiting for to buy some $STREETH.
This “Quicktake” is utter trash filled with a bunch of get-rich-quick-scam-dudes. Barely journalism.
PREACH. sounds like a cult mentality to me
Seems to me: Start teaching this in first grade. Kids' minds will savvy this and take it further. Get this info out there, all races. Everyone.
So much wasted power and heat from mining in todays climate, BUFUs all of them in this vid.
Gonna eventually dismantle big pharma
Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about. strawberry fields forever!
Thanks for the analysis! 🔍 I wanted to ask something unrelated: 🤔 I have these words 🤨. (behave today finger ski upon boy assault summer exhaust beauty stereo over). Can someone explain what this is? 😅
Paradigm shift!!!! 🤗🤭🥰🦋🌈✨👣💕
"Web 3.0 means taking the ideas of Web 1.0 and solidifying them"????
What kind of nothingness / meaningless statement is that.
Wow, We are in a bubble and it will burst soon. I'll invest in the ones survive.
* laughs in hbar *