Super job on this overview. Not an extra word, poorly constructed sentence or "ah". I have been looking for such an up-to-date overview. Thank you Sheila.
Wow, im in high school currently, and have always had a great interest in human evolution. Thanks for this video, I find it really interesting! It makes me debate my future careers, as I have a love of biology, evolution, and a keen interest in surgical nursing. I am sure that I will be binging many of the videos on your channel!
No! We may carry Neanderthal gene expression. This is the correct view. Their DNA sequence was compared to us and theirs was found to be 99.84% identical. So it is impossible for some of us have 1% to 4% of their DNA when there is only 00.16% to play with. So they WERE HUMAN with mere gene expression modifications for their environment. Gene expression happens in all of life's EPIGENOME. Its actions are called EPIGENETICS. It's a 2nd biological code that runs overtop the DNA like a software program. This fits an intelligent design signature, not the evolution one. Evolution is not happening. Evolutionists have used the epigenome's ability to make adaptations and call them 'microevolution'. However, no assumed evolving of DNA mutations happens with them. It's been a false precept. In fact, the evolution-iconic Darwin Finch's beak adaptations were materially found to be epigenome-derived...not evolution-derived. With 'microevolution' being absent, then all of the macroevolution mind-constructs are not possible. Evolution is NOT happening. It's all smoke and mirrors. We are from an intelligent design by Jesus Christ. His sacrifice on the cross was payment for OUR sins as we are imputed with 100% purity in exchange for our faith in it along with belief in his resurrection gives a FREE GIFT of eternal life. Do it today! Evolution is not an answer to our existence. God is, however.
Your presentation of paleoanthropology is most EXCELLENT. Absolutely SUPERB. It is the kind of comparative presentation that I have been looking for, for many years now. Kudos to you. And more power to you and your undertakings. (Please make the effort to update or revise your presentations as new discoveries and research findings emerge over time. Thank you.) 😊
Ms. Nightingale, Twice (21:15, 28.35) you mention migration flow back into Africa. I had not heard that hypothesis before. To the contrary, the most recent genetic evidence I am aware of suggests there was no introgression back into Africa after Neanderthal admixture. What period of time are you referring to and what evidence is there to support the idea?
Hello from México! Thanks alot for making th second part of these superb videos the day of my birthday (joking). I am writing a book about epistemology, atheism and religion and I would like to know how I can cite the information coming from this video. Besides, forgiving my ignorance, can any body tell me where exactly is the link of the description so I can get a copy of this family tree?
Thanks, what a great two videos, the timeline chart you filled out in the videos is just so easy to follow. I have a question about that, where could i find a much more detailed and complete version of a chart like that? :-)
Well put together hominin lineage, great students aspire to your example and lesser known lineages in south east asia, look forward to future episodes.
Your videos definitively seem authoritative, but I can find no reference to qualifications. My guess is you're at university lecturer or professor level. When talking to my daughters about science information on youtube I keep stressing that you need to evaluate the qualifications of the poster as much as the content. Would you mind providing perhaps a link to the organization that backs your qualifications ?
Thank you for this comment/question, Kent--you are absolutely right that it is very important for all of us to have a critical eye when it comes to content on the internet, and its awesome that you're teaching your daughters how to properly vet online resources. You are reminding me that I need to include some info about myself on my channel! To answer your question: I am an archaeologist, currently in the final stages of my PhD program. My research centers on the stone tool technologies of northern Malawi approximately 40-50 thousand years ago, to understand how human foragers responded to the particular challenges of their environment, how their technological behavior changed over time, and what this tells us about the evolutionary history and success of our species. My undergrad background is in archaeology and paleoanthropology, and I've worked on a diverse set of projects since then. And you're right that I am also a teacher: I am an adjunct lecturer working with a fantastic community of students in the City University of New York system. I started making these videos for them, but I'm excited that other folks are finding them interesting as well. :) Let me know if there are any other questions I can answer for you. And if you want to check out some of the research I've been involved with, here is the link to my profile on Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=M2uFFGsAAAAJ
Hi Shelia, very interesting talks, thank you. My ears did prick up when you mentioned cooking potatoes, this is wrong, it is a plant from the Americas, mentioning yams would be more suitable for the African continent.
Very good series of presentations! I feel like whatever healing that will one day come for our species will involve knowing that we share ancestry with every living thing. Not sure if I'm properly conveying what I mean, but I just feel like most people don't have a basic grasp of who we are in terms of biological evolution. It is what it is and it's just nature... not saying anything is "wrong", just that I feel that a more general agreement on the basic facts of our evolution will be central to creating a better world.
And now this(your comment) is more relevant than ever… Christian nationalism will kill America. People are so stupid they believe in the Bible and can’t even comprehend what we are! So all the lies they believe out of the Bible make them just believe stupid lies of the real world like trumps big lie saying voter fraud. Good lord that doesn’t exist!..please help! God can suck my dick and lick my a$$ btw.
In all the lectures I've heard, I've yet to hear the one trait unique to homo sapiens discussed. The focus is always on bipedalism or tooth development instead of the anatomy that allows us one behavior not known in any other animal - killing at distance. Every projectile point found is homo sapiens. We have the ability to throw over arm, unique in hominins. We are the only thing that kills "over there" instead of within grasp or reach.
Ah YT, so many excellent & gifted commentators, so little time to examine THEIR fantastic qualifications and review their doctorate level anthropology lectures. 👤👤👤
Wow this is an amazing video lecture! Very well put together and very well spoken! I had one question about the Neanderthal species dating... it stated 200 kya as the origin. Is this accurate? I’ve seen many other sources indicate much early dates of origin, going back 600-700 kya if I’m not mistaken. What is this later date of origin based on? Thanks
How is it possible to classify sparse fossilized bone fragments as belonging to a separate species? How is it possible to delineate a species from morphological observations on fossilized skeletons? What is the operational definition of 'species' used? Thank you for the great vids!
Wonderful, comprehensive lecture, superbly presented. One quibble, though. The diagram as finalized, seems to suggest that Denisovans and Neanderthals diverged much earlier than suggested by the genetic data (between 1 and 2 million years, vs 400-500 kyr). It has been suggested that H. heidelbergensis was the common ancestor for H neanderthalensis and the Denisovans. It would be wonderful if someone could find extractable DNA from H erectus!
2:34 I have a clarification. Does the size of hominid/hominin's teeth depend on how often it was used? I mean hominids have large teeth and they used it not just for eating while hominids have small teeth that were only used in eating since their tools have been developed.
I'm a bit of an amateur paleoanthropologist :-) and I have for a long time wondered what the difference is between Homo erectus and Homo ergaster? So far, I have thought that it is the same species and that the division has been a bit unnecessary ?! It seems that the difference is partly that Homo erectus is slightly, more advanced than Homo ergaster and Homo erectus was an Asian branch of Homo ergaster and very similar species .. ..if you know what I mean? Have I got it right? I look forward to more of your on-line lectures about our family tree ... or bush. Thank you for an interesting and informative channel.
To the person in the first comment. Google this lady. She is at the University of New York with other details on the page. If you double check her details against other Anthropology sources you will see she is right on the money. Her lecture is easier to understand than others I have listened to on the topic.
Interesting you should mention the fact that Neanderthals did not appear to use symbols. In our species of course we use symbols but only because we lack comprehension, at least this is the position of philosophy, and psychology. Symbology helps humans make sense of things we do not understand. Religious belief and the invention of god fall into this suite ofpoor comprehension of phenomenon, presented to us . Did Neanderthal have a better ability at comprehension of phenomena than sapien sapiens? Indeed our perception of reality is a psychological construct based on our limitations of comprehension, or lack of knowing.
I’m assuming you’re concluding the human lovers were female because of our difference in mitochondria? But there’s more than one way to get genes in the genome... Do you have other reasoning I’m missing?
The Cro Magnon type of early modern sapiens seem to have existed only in Eurasia during the latter stage of Pleistocene. It did not go to Australia 65 ky ago. So maybe there is different genetic introgression in Cro Magnon.
In my lay opinion … What if we were genetically engineered/ modified by an advanced species? If this is the case we're never going to discover the necessary missing link(s) no matter how deep we dig. For those who appreciate Occam's razor, interventionism could explain almost everything from human origins, plants, animals, to civilization itself - all with a single concept.
then whoever genetically engineered us made it so that everything points to evolution through natural selection. our genetic engineers are deceptive for whatever reason. Occam's razor wouldnt suggest that such beings even exist. let alone that we were engineered by them
Assuming that Neandertal females bred with modern males and that there is about 800 ky to a common ancestor, shouldn't there be some mitochondrial DNA circulating in a few Europeans identifiable as Neandertal in origin?
In fact evidence suggest interbreeding was more wide spread, given the high percentage of DNA recovered from that period being hybrids. The lack of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA is more likely just that mitochondrial DNA didn't survive, for example due to reproductive issues of male offspring, which is common in nature of hybrid species. Saying that just one gender of one species mated with the other gender of another species given that they co-existed for so long is somewhat ridiculous.
To preserve mitochondrial DNA there has to be a unbroken chain of daughters. The same holds true for the y-Chromosome. It would only transfer to modern times through a unbroken chain of sons. There was mating between H. sapiens and H. neanderthal of both sexes.
@@flugschulerfluglehrer So then either the hybrids didnt have children themselves or they had manly sons (or some mix of the two). Perhaps this combination was more likely to produce male offspring due to the way the X and Y chromosomes interacted with the pair? Idk just speculating would be interested in your opinion.
Explanations of the origins of Homo sapiens and their migrations at about 80k years is always vague and it is here as you admitted. I have created a phylogenetic table that goes further than just display species relationships but predicts them. I would be honoured if you take a look and see what you think. I have used it to explain the origins of Homo sapiens sapiens which may interest you.
I hate blanket statements about "every human alive today..." I don't recall giving my dna to a study. I don't know anyone who has. Did you? Do you know anyone who has?
This is the second of your videos I have watched. In the first one there were some leaps of logic and over-stated positions. I haven't made it too far into this one and there is one glaring error. There were no potatoes in the old world in the time frame of homo ergaster. May I advise that you need to clean up your fact-checking and be careful how you state your factual materials.
My recollection is that she spoke about adding tubers to the human dietary repertoire. For the benefit of her students, she explained that tubers are underground plant organs and gave examples that her students would understand ie potatoes and yams. She did not say that ancient Old World hominins were eating potatoes. Might I suggest that you pay more attention? There is in any case something called the African Wild Potato or African Potato.
Thank you. I just wonder when and who in our lineage became apex predators as we were and likely still are, in part, that resulted in slavery and wars for control and profit.
At what time the Spanish put bones. If early evolution then nonsense , so late to extinction of this species . They removed from large animal found in Germany. Hunted to Spain c.
The emw from a car needs to stop the vacteria in a human is unable to walk asodentheae metals s. Illness . And tjoesnsittongnnever run Thier medsntjrough a body stopped . Also the lights and WiFi off . The plants and insects are park faster better and more accurate the humans th whimans are for the most very ill.amd comprised.tjouhhts a need to.imagine in preference to say not driving a car and saying I'm not am addict . The foods sitting on the belly undigested meats.drininvgna.neednformsex.ocee.loard of brains.painss unable.to.devise to not drive switch off the WiFi and walk therefore eat less is tje extinction hate opeming
This relevance for data to public . The soils say of bogs decides visions. Therefore segregation of people. The druid. The destruction of Forrest's .. I think if sewer is not exported the knowledge of what yo come is a help. Humour comedy is best to bridge time with issues. There is room no need to feel they are helpful. Well. It is a self too my young ci Ukkooos fled . I see a better way by qyes and time that shows a human preferably to rush . Extinctions selections v.
The story of human evolution, for me, is one of a very flawed species. The only hominids left are us. Even the more highly advanced homo species did not make it. Modern human’s survival imo is a fluke. And that continues to hang by a thread via weapons of war, our fear of the “other”, and other technologies humans create. Our defining characteristic, intelligence and our ability to use it to make things, could easily be the reason we don’t survive as a species. Perhaps “human intelligence” isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. All the weird gods and religions we invent, the strange superstitions, etc are not very helpful for getting along. The arts, reason, rationalism, compassion, our powerful imaginations are all wonderful. But I’m not sure if that will save us from ourselves.
One critique... Neanderthals ARE humans... you keep saying neanderthans and humans when it would be correct to say Neanderthals and Sapiens... both of which are human species.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 83 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "พันฤทธิ์ vs ซุปเปอร์บอล วันของโอม MBK"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1b4pkKHa_Fk/mqdefault.jpg)
Super job on this overview. Not an extra word, poorly constructed sentence or "ah". I have been looking for such an up-to-date overview. Thank you Sheila.
Wow that was the best talk on evolution I've heard thank you
Watched all of it again, watched it before, still an excellent video
Nice job. I have been watching CARTA symposia for years, but this a great overview.
Wow, im in high school currently, and have always had a great interest in human evolution. Thanks for this video, I find it really interesting! It makes me debate my future careers, as I have a love of biology, evolution, and a keen interest in surgical nursing. I am sure that I will be binging many of the videos on your channel!
This video will help you understand the assumptions better: th-cam.com/video/dI5_HODseyE/w-d-xo.html
No! We may carry Neanderthal gene expression. This is the correct view. Their DNA sequence was compared to us and theirs was found to be 99.84% identical. So it is impossible for some of us have 1% to 4% of their DNA when there is only 00.16% to play with. So they WERE HUMAN with mere gene expression modifications for their environment. Gene expression happens in all of life's EPIGENOME. Its actions are called EPIGENETICS. It's a 2nd biological code that runs overtop the DNA like a software program. This fits an intelligent design signature, not the evolution one.
Evolution is not happening. Evolutionists have used the epigenome's ability to make adaptations and call them 'microevolution'. However, no assumed evolving of DNA mutations happens with them. It's been a false precept. In fact, the evolution-iconic Darwin Finch's beak adaptations were materially found to be epigenome-derived...not evolution-derived. With 'microevolution' being absent, then all of the macroevolution mind-constructs are not possible. Evolution is NOT happening. It's all smoke and mirrors.
We are from an intelligent design by Jesus Christ. His sacrifice on the cross was payment for OUR sins as we are imputed with 100% purity in exchange for our faith in it along with belief in his resurrection gives a FREE GIFT of eternal life. Do it today! Evolution is not an answer to our existence. God is, however.
This is great work I was looking for something like this for ages
Lots of good information while being entertaining. You should be a bridge to the general public.
Great overview that captures and assembles all the more specific videos I've watched over the past few years. Job well done!
Your presentation of paleoanthropology is most EXCELLENT. Absolutely SUPERB. It is the kind of comparative presentation that I have been looking for, for many years now. Kudos to you. And more power to you and your undertakings. (Please make the effort to update or revise your presentations as new discoveries and research findings emerge over time. Thank you.) 😊
Brilliant Sheila! Thanks.
great videos. Clear, concise, logical and factual. I watch a lot of Anthropology videos and these were among the best.
Very nicely presented series. Thank you for taking the time.
These two lectures are a fabulous overview of the hominin lineage and of the field of study. Thank you, S.N.
Fantastic both parts . Thank you so much!!
Very good. I look forward to listening to more of your lectures.
Ms. Nightingale, Twice (21:15, 28.35) you mention migration flow back into Africa. I had not heard that hypothesis before. To the contrary, the most recent genetic evidence I am aware of suggests there was no introgression back into Africa after Neanderthal admixture. What period of time are you referring to and what evidence is there to support the idea?
It's been a while for me on these topics, but I recall the Capsian people introducing both European and Neanderthal DNA into Africa
Amazing amazing brilliant video, you did an excellent job making these videos
Thanks for update of humanity tree. Appreciate the research that's being done. Excellent explanation. 👍
Very good, easy to follow. Please update us as the story unfolds.
Hello from México! Thanks alot for making th second part of these superb videos the day of my birthday (joking). I am writing a book about epistemology, atheism and religion and I would like to know how I can cite the information coming from this video. Besides, forgiving my ignorance, can any body tell me where exactly is the link of the description so I can get a copy of this family tree?
Thanks, what a great two videos, the timeline chart you filled out in the videos is just so easy to follow. I have a question about that, where could i find a much more detailed and complete version of a chart like that? :-)
Very well presented, you are an excellent teacher. Thank you very much! :)
Your videos are so interesting. I have watched several now and have enjoyed them all. Thank you for posting them.
Well put together hominin lineage, great students aspire to your example and lesser known lineages in south east asia, look forward to future episodes.
Your videos definitively seem authoritative, but I can find no reference to qualifications. My guess is you're at university lecturer or professor level. When talking to my daughters about science information on youtube I keep stressing that you need to evaluate the qualifications of the poster as much as the content. Would you mind providing perhaps a link to the organization that backs your qualifications ?
Thank you for this comment/question, Kent--you are absolutely right that it is very important for all of us to have a critical eye when it comes to content on the internet, and its awesome that you're teaching your daughters how to properly vet online resources. You are reminding me that I need to include some info about myself on my channel!
To answer your question: I am an archaeologist, currently in the final stages of my PhD program. My research centers on the stone tool technologies of northern Malawi approximately 40-50 thousand years ago, to understand how human foragers responded to the particular challenges of their environment, how their technological behavior changed over time, and what this tells us about the evolutionary history and success of our species. My undergrad background is in archaeology and paleoanthropology, and I've worked on a diverse set of projects since then. And you're right that I am also a teacher: I am an adjunct lecturer working with a fantastic community of students in the City University of New York system. I started making these videos for them, but I'm excited that other folks are finding them interesting as well. :)
Let me know if there are any other questions I can answer for you. And if you want to check out some of the research I've been involved with, here is the link to my profile on Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=M2uFFGsAAAAJ
Crisp and yet informative. Easy to understand and interestingly presented. I am from India and appreciate your explanations.
Same
Thanks for the wonderful presentation of human evolution.
Excellent breakdown. Thanks for this.
Hi Shelia, very interesting talks, thank you. My ears did prick up when you mentioned cooking potatoes, this is wrong, it is a plant from the Americas, mentioning yams would be more suitable for the African continent.
Highly informative video - putting it all together, sorting it out, and organizing our family tree . . . 🙋🏼♂️
Thank you, Sheila. Well done.
Very good series of presentations! I feel like whatever healing that will one day come for our species will involve knowing that we share ancestry with every living thing. Not sure if I'm properly conveying what I mean, but I just feel like most people don't have a basic grasp of who we are in terms of biological evolution. It is what it is and it's just nature... not saying anything is "wrong", just that I feel that a more general agreement on the basic facts of our evolution will be central to creating a better world.
And now this(your comment) is more relevant than ever… Christian nationalism will kill America. People are so stupid they believe in the Bible and can’t even comprehend what we are! So all the lies they believe out of the Bible make them just believe stupid lies of the real world like trumps big lie saying voter fraud. Good lord that doesn’t exist!..please help! God can suck my dick and lick my a$$ btw.
13:05 So it’s either a burial ritual or a pile of trash. Interesting. I get those mixed up sometimes too.
I've learnt so much from these 2 videos, thank you!!!
In all the lectures I've heard, I've yet to hear the one trait unique to homo sapiens discussed. The focus is always on bipedalism or tooth development instead of the anatomy that allows us one behavior not known in any other animal - killing at distance. Every projectile point found is homo sapiens. We have the ability to throw over arm, unique in hominins. We are the only thing that kills "over there" instead of within grasp or reach.
Good point.
Homo redsockensis then?
@@henkvandergaast3948 Doesn't Homo Yankian have a better ring?
Great vid. Now im curious about the mystery group I think you said 35,000 yrs ago. Hmm.
Excellent job again. Thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!.
Ah YT, so many excellent & gifted commentators, so little time to examine THEIR fantastic qualifications and review their doctorate level anthropology lectures. 👤👤👤
Excellent discussion you talk very well and so and I can understand every Everything You discuss it's true to my understanding
This is covering a lot informations.Thank you professor
Excellent discussion. Little about present day man is either simple or straightforward. It's appearing that it's always been that way. ;)
I'm glad you're covering all these different subjects because I am currently taking Anthropology and I just dislike reading.
Bravo 😁 love from Sweden ❤
Great presentation, thank you!
Wow this is an amazing video lecture! Very well put together and very well spoken! I had one question about the Neanderthal species dating... it stated 200 kya as the origin. Is this accurate? I’ve seen many other sources indicate much early dates of origin, going back 600-700 kya if I’m not mistaken. What is this later date of origin based on? Thanks
How is it possible to classify sparse fossilized bone fragments as belonging to a separate species? How is it possible to delineate a species from morphological observations on fossilized skeletons? What is the operational definition of 'species' used? Thank you for the great vids!
It makes you think when the next iteration will come. Homo Digitalensis?
Wonderful, comprehensive lecture, superbly presented. One quibble, though. The diagram as finalized, seems to suggest that Denisovans and Neanderthals diverged much earlier than suggested by the genetic data (between 1 and 2 million years, vs 400-500 kyr). It has been suggested that H. heidelbergensis was the common ancestor for H neanderthalensis and the Denisovans.
It would be wonderful if someone could find extractable DNA from H erectus!
Really good lecture! What about the Red Deer Cave people? Anything concrete about them?
2:34 I have a clarification. Does the size of hominid/hominin's teeth depend on how often it was used? I mean hominids have large teeth and they used it not just for eating while hominids have small teeth that were only used in eating since their tools have been developed.
Amazing video as well as the first part. I have to correct you Qafzeh as it is located in Palestine though, thought you should mention it.
Excellent! BTW, at 22:00 you said 315 million years ago when you meant 315 thousand years ago.
I'm a bit of an amateur paleoanthropologist :-) and I have for a long time wondered what the difference is between Homo erectus and Homo ergaster? So far, I have thought that it is the same species and that the division has been a bit unnecessary ?!
It seems that the difference is partly that Homo erectus is slightly, more advanced than Homo ergaster and Homo erectus was an Asian branch of Homo ergaster and very similar species .. ..if you know what I mean? Have I got it right?
I look forward to more of your on-line lectures about our family tree ... or bush. Thank you for an interesting and informative channel.
Thanks for the update! 👍
To the person in the first comment. Google this lady. She is at the University of New York with other details on the page. If you double check her details against other Anthropology sources you will see she is right on the money. Her lecture is easier to understand than others I have listened to on the topic.
Fascinating thank you
Interesting you should mention the fact that Neanderthals did not appear to use symbols. In our species of course we use symbols but only because we lack comprehension, at least this is the position of philosophy, and psychology. Symbology helps humans make sense of things we do not understand. Religious belief and the invention of god fall into this suite ofpoor comprehension of phenomenon, presented to us . Did Neanderthal have a better ability at comprehension of phenomena than sapien sapiens? Indeed our perception of reality is a psychological construct based on our limitations of comprehension, or lack of knowing.
Well explained!
Excellent 2
Well there goes my interest in any of my DNA test ideas.
Great video!
¡Me encantó! Great narrative and excellent analysis. Hope to hear more about this subject in the near future.
I’m assuming you’re concluding the human lovers were female because of our difference in mitochondria? But there’s more than one way to get genes in the genome... Do you have other reasoning I’m missing?
It seems to me following fires would predate building cooking fires. They do the hunting and cooking all at once.
The Cro Magnon type of early modern sapiens seem to have existed only in Eurasia during the latter stage of Pleistocene. It did not go to Australia 65 ky ago. So maybe there is different genetic introgression in Cro Magnon.
In my lay opinion … What if we were genetically engineered/ modified by an advanced species? If this is the case we're never going to discover the necessary missing link(s) no matter how deep we dig. For those who appreciate Occam's razor, interventionism could explain almost everything from human origins, plants, animals, to civilization itself - all with a single concept.
then whoever genetically engineered us made it so that everything points to evolution through natural selection.
our genetic engineers are deceptive for whatever reason.
Occam's razor wouldnt suggest that such beings even exist.
let alone that we were engineered by them
Fascinating!
Thank you!
Assuming that Neandertal females bred with modern males and that there is about 800 ky to a common ancestor, shouldn't there be some mitochondrial DNA circulating in a few Europeans identifiable as Neandertal in origin?
The lack of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA in modern humans would indicate that female H sapiens mated with Neaderthals, not the males.
In fact evidence suggest interbreeding was more wide spread, given the high percentage of DNA recovered from that period being hybrids. The lack of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA is more likely just that mitochondrial DNA didn't survive, for example due to reproductive issues of male offspring, which is common in nature of hybrid species. Saying that just one gender of one species mated with the other gender of another species given that they co-existed for so long is somewhat ridiculous.
To preserve mitochondrial DNA there has to be a unbroken chain of daughters. The same holds true for the y-Chromosome. It would only transfer to modern times through a unbroken chain of sons. There was mating between H. sapiens and H. neanderthal of both sexes.
@@flugschulerfluglehrer Thanks!
@@flugschulerfluglehrer So then either the hybrids didnt have children themselves or they had manly sons (or some mix of the two). Perhaps this combination was more likely to produce male offspring due to the way the X and Y chromosomes interacted with the pair? Idk just speculating would be interested in your opinion.
I don’t understand the poor food quality. Nature provides. Lots of berries natural fruit and vegetables?
On 32.15 Philippines is misspelled.
Thank you.
Amazing
title of partv3?
THANKS FOR THE VIDEO ❤ LOVE YOU 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
20.35 Tibet seems wrongly located
Wow, I had no idea Homo egaster wielded fire. Hominins are impressive.
315 million years ago huh? That’s a while back
Explanations of the origins of Homo sapiens and their migrations at about 80k years is always vague and it is here as you admitted. I have created a phylogenetic table that goes further than just display species relationships but predicts them. I would be honoured if you take a look and see what you think. I have used it to explain the origins of Homo sapiens sapiens which may interest you.
Great
I hate blanket statements about "every human alive today..." I don't recall giving my dna to a study. I don't know anyone who has. Did you? Do you know anyone who has?
Haha you are a prognosticator. Enjoyed the talk but yes a year later and things are outdated
This is the second of your videos I have watched. In the first one there were some leaps of logic and over-stated positions. I haven't made it too far into this one and there is one glaring error. There were no potatoes in the old world in the time frame of homo ergaster. May I advise that you need to clean up your fact-checking and be careful how you state your factual materials.
My recollection is that she spoke about adding tubers to the human dietary repertoire. For the benefit of her students, she explained that tubers are underground plant organs and gave examples that her students would understand ie potatoes and yams. She did not say that ancient Old World hominins were eating potatoes. Might I suggest that you pay more attention?
There is in any case something called the African Wild Potato or African Potato.
Thank you. I just wonder when and who in our lineage became apex predators as we were and likely still are, in part, that resulted in slavery and wars for control and profit.
Potatoes don't make it to the Old World until the 1500s.
315,000-160,000 years ago homo sapiens appear 21.48
Homo is Latin for man and Sapien means wise.
nice work make a video about race
At what time the Spanish put bones. If early evolution then nonsense , so late to extinction of this species . They removed from large animal found in Germany. Hunted to Spain c.
,what metals predominate the African regions seeing evolutions drives
Tilt to the or away from sun the hydrogen oxeygen relationship. To cut metals and ceell life. Access to fruits in the right temperature
The emw from a car needs to stop the vacteria in a human is unable to walk asodentheae metals s. Illness . And tjoesnsittongnnever run Thier medsntjrough a body stopped . Also the lights and WiFi off . The plants and insects are park faster better and more accurate the humans th whimans are for the most very ill.amd comprised.tjouhhts a need to.imagine in preference to say not driving a car and saying I'm not am addict . The foods sitting on the belly undigested meats.drininvgna.neednformsex.ocee.loard of brains.painss unable.to.devise to not drive switch off the WiFi and walk therefore eat less is tje extinction hate opeming
Meat is not food is it
This relevance for data to public . The soils say of bogs decides visions. Therefore segregation of people.
The druid. The destruction of Forrest's .. I think if sewer is not exported the knowledge of what yo come is a help. Humour comedy is best to bridge time with issues.
There is room no need to feel they are helpful. Well. It is a self too my young ci
Ukkooos fled . I see a better way by qyes and time that shows a human preferably to rush . Extinctions selections v.
Humans were created.
THEY DIDNT GO EXTINCT GOD DANGIT
The story of human evolution, for me, is one of a very flawed species. The only hominids left are us. Even the more highly advanced homo species did not make it. Modern human’s survival imo is a fluke. And that continues to hang by a thread via weapons of war, our fear of the “other”, and other technologies humans create. Our defining characteristic, intelligence and our ability to use it to make things, could easily be the reason we don’t survive as a species. Perhaps “human intelligence” isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. All the weird gods and religions we invent, the strange superstitions, etc are not very helpful for getting along. The arts, reason, rationalism, compassion, our powerful imaginations are all wonderful. But I’m not sure if that will save us from ourselves.
Jj
One critique... Neanderthals ARE humans... you keep saying neanderthans and humans when it would be correct to say Neanderthals and Sapiens... both of which are human species.
They aren’t modern humans