Why AI Won't Replace Teachers
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 มี.ค. 2023
- Artificial Intelligence futurists are predicting that AI will provide students with an entirely personalized educational experience - one that has the potential to replace teachers. In this video, we explore the distinction between personalized learning (human-driven) and adaptive learning (AI-driven). Adaptive learning is algorithm-driven, with students progressing through pre-set curriculum and the AI making adjustments to their skill level based on their answers. Personalized learning, by contrast, is human-driven, with a focus on authentic, real-world problem-solving and collaboration. Both approaches have their place, but personalized learning is ultimately a more human-centered approach.
I think you have an extremely idealised view of teachers tbh, most of the teachers I've had were terrible and put me off the subject. The only reason they were necessary to me before was because if I tried teaching myself a subject by reading and researching, I'd always have questions that I'd need answering, and I'd have no one to ask (I couldn't find the answers online since they were too specific and niche, and no one seems to know the answer when I ask on sites like Quora). But now that I can ask the AI anything I want, and it always explains it far better than any human does whenever I ask them online, and explains it instantly, teachers are obsolete for me now (which is fantastic, since it opens the doors to education for me now since I don't have to pay for courses or private tutors). All the stuff you said about adaptive learning, etc. I think is unimportant. In the end, it's just someone explaining something to you. As long as they do that well, then I don't see why it's important whether it's a human or an AI.
"A.I wont replace teachers" -said by a teacher in denial
Will you pls share for which subject did you use chatgpt?
I think you're missing the point. Education is more about human interaction than it's about content. I feel sorry for you that you've never had inspirational teachers in your life.
A good teacher can never be replaced by AI. The opposite idea is an idealistic view.
do you think preschool teachers can be replaced too?
AI sometimes messes up and provides you with wrong information unless you have enough knowledge to discern between what's right and what's wrong. So when you're learning something AI might mess your learning up significantly
John, I am enjoying your videos. I think where you and differ is a matter of semantics.
If I back up a bit, I see learning as an adaptiion response in the humans.We respond to stimulus ( information) through our senses and adjust or adapt accordingly to preserve life and/or maintain homeostasis. This usually involves feedback loops.
So it's adaptive and personal.
Even on structured classroom learning, the classroom is the environment where stimuli happens and learning takes place. Ultimately, the learning takes place in the students mind which effectively makes them all autodidacts of sorts.
It's always adaptive and personal.
The teacher serves as a facilitator by preparing the learning environments and coaxing stimili.
John. I love your AI video. Makes an important distinction between personalized and individualized learning. What do you use to make your video?
Based on these argument AI will definately replace teachers. Thanka for the heads up
Nice video.will you please share which subject you teach in college.Thanks.
This is an important video to understand and share.
Great video John! Where you see AI fitting and not fitting is curiously aligned with where the teaching profession sees as bad and good teaching. I think sadly that AI will replace the majority of teachers unless we highlight those differences because as soon as 51+ percent of a state or federal legislature see the cost savings for good enough education we will live in the dystopia illustrated in books like Ready Player One.
Thank you for posting. How can we connect with you? Email or IG? Social media?
I'm only speaking from working in the elementary level, but elementary schools need human teachers with the amount of social-emotional learning and care kids need today. AI can only do so much, but the human element is missing and that's what kids need.
I agree. The human element is critical.
Yeah, you need to revisit this claim. I have heard heads of AI companies even suggest that education and health are the largest impacted industry.
Imagine individualized teachers for students on a computer ...
It will.
it depends who the teacher is and how he or she teaches
AI can replace students not only teachers.
One day the robot will directly take data from each other.
The advancement of learning model
not yet
In about two years it will replace us
This is gonna age like milk
2023 is the worst A.I can ever be, and it will only get better from here.
The problem with all your examples is that they don't upgrade like A.I does.
Tools don't self-learn like A.I does.
Gadgets don't self-evolve like A.I does.
I like your animations but I don't understand why you can't see that 2023
is the worst A.I can ever be, and it will only improve from here.
Incrementally.
I disagree 2023 Ai has it tweaks for its early age but it is evolving.For example think about or talk about a topic and watch your algorithm pop up with it
If you want to train and educate a race of robots who see black and white then you can rely soley on AI...
But human interraction is also always evolving, and a sense of belonging can only be truly found within healthy social spheres of human interaction
I see two big problems with what you present here:
1. AI is rapidly becoming capable of what you call personalized learning. We already have the core technologies necessary to support AI led free form discussions and responding to students' emotions and desires. While applying the technology will take some time (a decade, I think), it is inevitable. What you call adaptive learning has actually been within our technical capabilities for at least two decades.
2. You can't compare AI-learing to the very best efforts that modern teachers are capable of. You need to compare it to the average effort. There are vast advantages to personalized learning over adaptive learning in many contexts. However, in practice, very little actual K-12 education is remotely similar to what you call personalized learning. Even great teachers spend most of their time teaching in less personalized styles, and when they are doing "personalized learning" their efforts are split across the many children they have in their care. Average teachers rarely rise to this standard. And this is BEFORE we factor in cost, which strongly favors automation.
Either you had terrible experiences with teachers growing up, or you have a dystopian future in mind (which is honestly the highest probability).
You are, however, trying to eliminate a core element of what makes us "human" ... cultures and traditions form part of what a teacher does.
We look up to a "human" with whom we can relate to, to inspire us to do great things as humans. We can read facial expressions and fine-tune our abilities to match our peers and unique community.
Identity is a much bigger problem here than I think you understand. Teachers are a fundamental part of what makes us we who are, whether they're our parents or leaders.
Considering that a dystopian society is most likely, your argument may have some power.
If robots educate new generations, the elites will have much greater control over discipline and propaganda.
However, I doubt humans will survive for that long.
A.I will not replace teachers.
It will only make teaching irrelevant.
PAINFUL TRUTH: Teachers can still be teachers, only they are not necessary anymore.
AI will most likely do a better job too.
Eventually, AI will replace teachers. Teaching is becoming a dead career
I've heard that for 30+ years with new iterations of technology.
@@spencereducation
We have never in all of human history had AI that is even remotely as advanced as we currently do today, and it's advancing every year at an exponential rate. Within just the last year, AI has advanced by leaps and bounds.
At this rate of advancement, if within 10 years we don't have AI that is absolutely capable of replacing a human teacher, I will be completely shocked. It's very likely that AI will become advanced enough within a couple of years from now. Anyone who thinks any differently, either doesn't understand the technology, or hasn't looked into how much AI technology has progressed in the last year.
Either you had terrible experiences with teachers growing up, or you have a dystopian future in mind (which is honestly the highest probability).
You are, however, trying to eliminate a core element of what makes us "human" ... cultures and traditions form part of what a teacher does.
We look up to a "human" with whom we can relate to, to inspire us to do great things as humans. We can read facial expressions and fine-tune our abilities to match our peers and unique community.
Identity is a much bigger problem here than I think you understand. Teachers are a fundamental part of what makes us we who are, whether they're our parents or leaders.
Considering that a dystopian society is most likely, your argument may have some power.
If robots educate new generations, the elites will have much greater control over discipline and propaganda.
However, I doubt humans will survive for that long.
No it wont
2 min. 30 sec. For me, AI, TH-cam and Wikipedia replaced teachers 100%. I prefer the net than humans. Will I ever find some reason why I should work with humans for optimum progress? Apparently not this time. Good luck with the channel!
Either you had terrible experiences with teachers growing up, or you have a dystopian future in mind (which is honestly the highest probability).
You are, however, trying to eliminate a core element of what makes us "human" ... cultures and traditions form part of what a teacher does.
We look up to a "human" with whom we can relate to, to inspire us to do great things as humans. We can read facial expressions and fine-tune our abilities to match our peers and unique community.
Identity is a much bigger problem here than I think you understand. Teachers are a fundamental part of what makes us we who are, whether they're our parents or leaders.
Considering that a dystopian society is most likely, your argument may have some power.
If robots educate new generations, the elites will have much greater control over discipline and propaganda.
However, I doubt humans will survive for that long.
This whole video is just pure cope.