Can we have a breakdown on the Labour government ? Their Donators, especially from abroad, Businesses that they are making money from their Stocks & Shares, Crime Stats by Nationality and all other activities that the public should be aware of ??
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Other countries are not following by example. I would affirm that Britain could gain from incentivizing the manufacturing of new green tech, as solar panels, wind power, and electric vehicles are cheaper and better than their alternatives, but instead it simply incentivizes the use of these technologies, driving up trade deficits, decreasing British influence, and increasing British dependence on China. Meanwhile, migration continues to cause significant social issues, and, in some cases, unspeakable horrors. It is clear that your green political focus should not be the priority right now.
@@KingArthurWs Green agenda and control of immigration are not either or. We can do both. However, the best way to slow down the movement of people is to make their home a place they want to be rather impoverished and dangerous.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Are we not giving around £10 billion p/a in foreign aid precisely with that aim. Since we have been doing that since the 1970s it doesn't seem to be working
As soon as I see a headline like yours I immediately assume it's going to be slander
The WEF carried out a coup against Truss as she was going to allow fracking. Hence Rishi/Hunt.
Tice the "scientist" 🤣
Does Tice not have a financial interest in fracking?
Can we have a breakdown on the Labour government ? Their Donators, especially from abroad, Businesses that they are making money from their Stocks & Shares, Crime Stats by Nationality and all other activities that the public should be aware of ??
Good point.
You lost get over it.
You missed donations from fake Green companies to keep the green gravy train rolling.
Of all the countries in the world (200), UK ranks 17th, so not insignificant (top 10%).
And worse in terms of historical emissions - 8th.
Britain emits less than 1% of CO2. I wouldn't be too worried.
It does not matter. You can only lead by example.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Other countries are not following by example. I would affirm that Britain could gain from incentivizing the manufacturing of new green tech, as solar panels, wind power, and electric vehicles are cheaper and better than their alternatives, but instead it simply incentivizes the use of these technologies, driving up trade deficits, decreasing British influence, and increasing British dependence on China. Meanwhile, migration continues to cause significant social issues, and, in some cases, unspeakable horrors. It is clear that your green political focus should not be the priority right now.
@@KingArthurWs Green agenda and control of immigration are not either or. We can do both. However, the best way to slow down the movement of people is to make their home a place they want to be rather impoverished and dangerous.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Are we not giving around £10 billion p/a in foreign aid precisely with that aim. Since we have been doing that since the 1970s it doesn't seem to be working
@@patrickkyle4601 You don't know what things would be like if he hadn't.