🙏68 kid(April) I've experienced fisrt moon return n now jwst just makes us so INSIGNIFICANT in every dimension. yet so destructive are we in our relationship with each other and nature🤔😭😭😭
Love this new channel on the cosmos! In seven quick minutes we get allot. Would love for you to cap the ending with maybe 1 or 2 minutes of just a long slow visual zooming in and pulling back to fully comprehend the entire deep field images….maybe a mystic track too?
is there any way of knowing if there will be at some point a new and longer jwst take of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field? or are they doing the same in other portions of the sky?
The images from the JWST and some of the discoveries are very cool. Amazing technology. But in my opinion, JWST just enhances what we have already known using our current telescopes. I have been following JWST and nothing has really caught my attention. No major news of really extraordinary discoveries. Yes, we now have some better knowledge of our solar system planets, materials, and other distant galaxies, great! For now, we need to focus efforts solving our energy production needs. $10 billion would have gone a long ways to the discovery of new energy production technology. The more energy we can produce, the more advanced we can become. Read that sentence again. The advancements in energy production will solve a lot of problems and also help us reach the stars. As with our current telescopes, I would like to see discoveries of other signs of life! Proof of distant civilizations. More planets that are habitable. Perhaps JWST can help with the Mars ongoing efforts to find areas of interest. Who would have thought! For the record I am an advid amateur astronomer.
I get very tired of AI telling me all about the “wonder” of JWST. Sure, it IS amazing but constant harping on about it gets boring. This is a great update. Why? Because it illustrates what JWST DOES in current time rather than what was. Thank you.
These jets JWST is discovering everywhere so indicate a view of the effect of Birkeland Currents likely to eventually turn out to be responsible for almost everything!
Does the existence of a galaxy 290 million years after the big bang change the way in which it was thought they came into being? Let me surmise without a shred of evidence: That galaxy presumably has a supermassive black hole at the centre, around which a huge mass of matter revolved, forming stars very quickly. But the existence of a supermassive black hole so early - doesn't that imply one of two things, either: a) the initial expansion of the universe was clumpy, with more matter in denser regions allowing black holes to form very quickly, or..heresy coming... b) the initial explosion of the Big Bang at time zero spat out a mixture of energy and black holes I repeat, I have absolutely no evidence for either conjecture (I'm not even gracing them with the term hypothesis). But...how does a supermassive black hole form so early?
@@DanBeech-ht7sw He also proposed there was no Higgs boson. Edit: Well some scientists musn't have gotten the message, Sir Roger Penrose for one. You may also want to look at the New Scientist article entitled: The hunt for black holes older than the universe itself.
The current leading ideas are that huge clouds of gas (hydrogen and helium) collapsed, merged and formed black holes, or that many Pop III stars (the first stars with masses >100 and maybe >1000 solar masses) formed and merged together. It is most likely a combination of both methods. The biggest problem in the first idea is trying to physically explain how the collapse could happen so quickly, since large amounts of gas should heat up rapidly and stop the collapse.
@tonywells6990 I totally understand the problem with the first idea. Even tge second is problematic because the black holes would have to converge somehow in an era where the expansion is taking the black holes rapidly apart. And then galaxies and stars forming simultaneously.... My problem is not understanding well enough. But thank you very much for taking the time to share your thoughts
You like showing your face way too much. I'd rather see the subject information. When you do finally show the title subject it is dirty around zooming in and out so no one can focus on it. So, for that reason, I'm out!
Thanks! I'm so tired of videos claiming to show the latest JST discoveries, that instead want to tell me the history of the JST over and over again.
I feel so fortunate to be alive during this time in our scientific history. JWST is an amazing instrument.
🙏68 kid(April) I've experienced fisrt moon return n now jwst just makes us so INSIGNIFICANT in every dimension.
yet so destructive are we in our relationship with each other and nature🤔😭😭😭
Great summary of what has been happening with JWST.
Great video. I'm subscribing. Thanks for your succinct and good humoured narration.
Love this new channel on the cosmos! In seven quick minutes we get allot. Would love for you to cap the ending with maybe 1 or 2 minutes of just a long slow visual zooming in and pulling back to fully comprehend the entire deep field images….maybe a mystic track too?
👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EXCELLENT , THANK YOU!
Thanks for getting to the point, without hyperbole, speculation etc. Liked & Subscribed
Thanks for the summary. Very exciting and interesting.
Wow, soo cool! So succinct and to the point ...
exciting times! thank you for your efforts!
Great video! Thank you!
Brilliant chris , that telescope is awesome 🚀 🛰🛰 🌙 🌞🌞🌞
Interesting. Thanks.
Great Photos!
Thank you for getting right to it. We got a lot of bang for the buck with that awesome telescope!
After all the delays and cost overruns it's good that we're getting these results.
Nicely done.
Nice! I needed that overview, how about some info on Andromeda’s black hole that seems to be birthing new blue stars.
Apparently, telescopes can make your standard hand become flipping hands, and here is the proof.
PS great video. Thankx.....
Thanks for staying on topic, it is Much Appreciated 😊
Keep it up and you'll have a sub, 👍 for now 😊
Thank you for the tour. I have a great interest in JWST discoveries, but most TH-cam videos on the subject are made click bait.
is there any way of knowing if there will be at some point a new and longer jwst take of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field? or are they doing the same in other portions of the sky?
The images from the JWST and some of the discoveries are very cool. Amazing technology. But in my opinion, JWST just enhances what we have already known using our current telescopes. I have been following JWST and nothing has really caught my attention. No major news of really extraordinary discoveries. Yes, we now have some better knowledge of our solar system planets, materials, and other distant galaxies, great! For now, we need to focus efforts solving our energy production needs. $10 billion would have gone a long ways to the discovery of new energy production technology. The more energy we can produce, the more advanced we can become. Read that sentence again. The advancements in energy production will solve a lot of problems and also help us reach the stars.
As with our current telescopes, I would like to see discoveries of other signs of life! Proof of distant civilizations. More planets that are habitable. Perhaps JWST can help with the Mars ongoing efforts to find areas of interest. Who would have thought! For the record I am an advid amateur astronomer.
"hydrocarbons in the protoplanetary disc"
That's a lot of fuel lmao
Don't plan on any savings at the pump...
I get very tired of AI telling me all about the “wonder” of JWST. Sure, it IS amazing but constant harping on about it gets boring. This is a great update. Why? Because it illustrates what JWST DOES in current time rather than what was. Thank you.
Lots of supernovae. Well, we gots to get our atoms somewhere.
A new star, that makes 450,380,058,363.484 plus 0ne
This is big.
🤠👍
These jets JWST is discovering everywhere so indicate a view of the effect of Birkeland Currents likely to eventually turn out to be responsible for almost everything!
Does the existence of a galaxy 290 million years after the big bang change the way in which it was thought they came into being?
Let me surmise without a shred of evidence:
That galaxy presumably has a supermassive black hole at the centre, around which a huge mass of matter revolved, forming stars very quickly.
But the existence of a supermassive black hole so early - doesn't that imply one of two things, either:
a) the initial expansion of the universe was clumpy, with more matter in denser regions allowing black holes to form very quickly, or..heresy coming...
b) the initial explosion of the Big Bang at time zero spat out a mixture of energy and black holes
I repeat, I have absolutely no evidence for either conjecture (I'm not even gracing them with the term hypothesis).
But...how does a supermassive black hole form so early?
Maybe it's a remenant of a previous universe?
@Dooguk Weinberg proved in the 1970s that isn't possible - it's an entropy thing
@@DanBeech-ht7sw He also proposed there was no Higgs boson.
Edit: Well some scientists musn't have gotten the message, Sir Roger Penrose for one. You may also want to look at the New Scientist article entitled: The hunt for black holes older than the universe itself.
The current leading ideas are that huge clouds of gas (hydrogen and helium) collapsed, merged and formed black holes, or that many Pop III stars (the first stars with masses >100 and maybe >1000 solar masses) formed and merged together. It is most likely a combination of both methods.
The biggest problem in the first idea is trying to physically explain how the collapse could happen so quickly, since large amounts of gas should heat up rapidly and stop the collapse.
@tonywells6990 I totally understand the problem with the first idea. Even tge second is problematic because the black holes would have to converge somehow in an era where the expansion is taking the black holes rapidly apart. And then galaxies and stars forming simultaneously....
My problem is not understanding well enough.
But thank you very much for taking the time to share your thoughts
thank you . ( 2024 / Oct / 26 )
8 JWST discoveries but only 7 links?
🤔this guy has no education'
And you have not read the book of *Job* in the Bible?
@Kirk-d7v yep, so'''''''' yur Job 2? u being bombarded with afflictions too?
@
The book *Job* was written for “atheists” and I’m not of the atheist faith,so no……..
No suffering for me EPO will have to do for now.
Helpful hint: Maybe try keeping your hands in your pockets. Impossible to watch video.
Show the pictures more than your face,🙄
You like showing your face way too much. I'd rather see the subject information. When you do finally show the title subject it is dirty around zooming in and out so no one can focus on it. So, for that reason, I'm out!