Considering that the current high-altitude spraying programs use aluminum dioxide and other metals which are toxic to humans, I would say, yes, it is too risky. Most people are completely unaware that this has been underway for decades.
What happens when the sun heats the metals in our atmosphere, what happens when we breath these metals. I think we are watching the side-effects of geoengneering .
Prophet … you are wrong it has been happening full force since Dec 2022 why don’t you look up for once you should be enraged at what they are doing and it is no coincidence that 2023 was the hottest year ever recorded for earth,… their experiment has failed and they are heating the earth and waters, and they are claiming they dont know why this major jump in water temp has happened, they are lying to you
One could argue the changes in agriculture and other areas which have resulted in the higher living standards of modern society are all down to bettering nature. We changed crop yields and quality by natural selection, modified our environment to be suitable for fields and changed our role in relation to nature. Humans innately modify and attempt to better nature, sometimes to our own determent, but other times to our benefit 🙂
One only needs to watch the evening weather forecast to realize how much we don't understand how our earth works. How can you seriously think about altering something when you have no idea what all your consequences will be? The unforeseen problems would be catastrophic with no ability to rewind when it goes wrong. "Well that didn't go as planned" or "ooops sorry" are not phrases we want to hear from a group of scientist as we're plunged into total darkness. No, just no, bad idea.
@@ghada.El.Khoury fires are part of natures way of cleaning up and we only pay more attention to them cause we move and build in the forest. This is a terrible idea that has no off switch and when it goes bad we're stuck with the consequences. No, just no.
Such is the folly of man. Driven by hubris to believe they are the masters of the universe and everything is within their control. Scientists should stop tinkering with forces beyond their control lest they unleash consequences beyond their imagination.
Anton that is BS they are doing it as we speak since Dec 2022 two years into their 5 year plan and heating the earth and waters at a rapid pace now, the climate issue is a fraud and they are now causing extreme heat and flooding all over the world then blaming climate change
Cooling by geo-engineering has been happening for years already. I live in British Columbia, Canada. During the COVID lockout there were no commercial flights but the sky was crossed by a huge number of aircrafts with very long trace of condensed gas; immediately after clouds started to form and in a few hours cloudiness covered the previous beautiful blue sky. I am wondering if the aluminum colloidal particles spayed by those aircrafts deposited on trees were the cause of the wildest fires in the boreal forests of western Canada and the US, since aluminum is a very flammable metal at particle level.
Seriously did Canada have planes doing this during lockdown because in UK we had constant clear blue sky almost every day with no commercial flights and No cloud seeding at all Just goes to show how much more corrupt Canada is from UK
@grindupBakerLies, I just read a book where they say it's the fire salamanders. And the rains are provoked by planes but piloted by Sylphs, obviously the hard work is mainly pulled by the Undines who have to dive to bring water droplets to BC.
All anyone needs to do is do a search of weather modification or geoengineering and you will find many documents and patents on weather modification proving they are already on going massive programs that have been going on for 75 years.
I think we urgently need to retrace our steps of how we got here and dedicate more resources into undoing all that harm, hopefully our grandchildren will see the benefits. I feel like we would be creating more imbalances using these technologies and would make the problem worse. It takes energy to implement all these solutions and we're not doing to great on that. Imagine stopping this after 30 years due to a lack of energy. The consequences would be disastruous. Please don't.
@@antireligionwhyreligionmus2819 so you think they flew the planes into the towers strictly for religious purposes? That’s false, it was payback and an attempt to collapse financial system.
Wow, the audience here is broad, educated and most people seem to agree with this comment, I think. That's horrible. Look at us fearing progress. Look at us hoping to go backwards. When was the last time we were so afraid of our own potential?
Climate manipulation is already being done but to deliberately cause more problems and push more farmers into going broke and you into starvation so you become more compliant.
Hope that engineers consult with geologists to fully understand planetary dynamics, and Snowball Earth. In the geological record, Earth was in most cases an ice cube of a plant with little to no life. Also, reducing the amount of sunlight will reduce plant growth, affecting food production, and other unintended consequences.
Has been " reducing " / destroying & toxifying All Life, 4 many decades & still ONGOING. Patented CE, since 1947. In the Skies above you 2022, Day & Night. 🙏
Snowball Earth was a couple of billion years ago, we are in an ice age cycle today now. Earth is going through the warming part of the cycle that comes just before the cooling. The ice period is coming back no matter what we do.
Geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades. The media lies and says that they might need to deploy it. This fact desperately needs to be exposed to the public if we are to stop it. I encourage you to watch the documentary "the dimming" on youtube. It fully exposes these programs for what they are.
A solution to a problem almost always creates another. The benefit depends on how well you manage the following consequences. Penicillin was great but now we have to deal with super microbes.
Bio-engineered crop designed to act as a pesticide itself to protect from cropeater 1, successfully killed it when it tried to munch on the crop and hence BioE-crop achieved its purpose. But cropeater 1 who also used to eat cropeater 2 is now no more, so now cropeater 2 takes his place and gets to eat the crop, As you can see that, certain crop ecosystem have new boss with new rules. As a final result, nothing changed, infact situation became worse than before.
It's not happening, its actually banned under the 2010 UN Convention on Biological Diversity, over 500 scientists and experts are calling for a formal solar geoengineering non-use agreement, even though as they say it's still speculative technology not in use. About This Initiative - Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement
Mexico refuses to do it, but we are doing it and there will be alot of death , haven’t you looked up the past two years probably not, nose is always in the phone, they are counting on people like you not to notice
The biggest risk here is humans themselves. Imagine having the problem temporarily solved, but people got complacent that we continued doing what we're doing, then when the temporary solution broke down or expires, we end up being far worse than where we started
They didn't want to give up their taxes, governments, monkey go-carts and meaty treats, they blamed other nations and the billionaires. Astroturf the garden and fly to NZ for a weekend break on a speedbird.
This idea far left wing dumb satanic communist agenda. Very dangerous to block the sun. Also this is going to make billionaires trillionres and hard working tax payers have to pay for their projects. Remember global warming happens once every few hundred years and that's nothing worry about.
@@wobblybobengland They blamed the billionaires for a reason. 100 companies are responsible for more than 70% of CO2 emissions. Ecocid is occurring ecocid is capitalist and there is no capitalist solution to a capitalist ecocid. That’s what a lot of people think in France maybe in US you are too brainwashed about capitalism to understand .
Also, this temporary “solution” could never be considered a fix because it also ignores the absolutely massive problem of ocean acidification which has nothing to do with heat but with CO2 being absorbed into the oceans. The only option to try and begin to unfuck ourselves is to stop polluting. We need many different ideas and millions of people working on this problem from every angle, it’s the only way forward for us.
Messing with a system so nonlinear and we know so little about is dangerous. This shading proposal is almost saying that a nuclear winter is a blessing.
Proponents of geoengineering projects would argue that addressing those symptoms can give us more time to address the root causes (reducing greenhouse gasses emissions, and removing enormous quantities of carbon from the atmosphere). We appear to be moving in the right direction of lowering carbon emissions, but we might not get there fast enough to avoid catastrophic climate change unless we also lean on some form of geoengineering as an interim solution while we finish decarbonizing our energy production and pulling enough carbon from the atmosphere to make that interim solution no longer necessary.
The idea of Solar geoengineering is suicidal, it will disrupt rainfall patterns all across the world especially affecting countries that depend on monsoon rainfall for food production like India, and reducing the rate of photosynthesis in plants as a direct consequence of global dimming, causing acute food crisis all over the world.
@@user-1281 Vit D carency, melatonin erratic secretion, effect of the products used to cause the shade etc.. We don't know how or what the effect on human body can be. So it is a risky bet. Reducing our GHG is way safer.
@@user-1281 If you want to argue on the "new" then fine, your win. Doesn't really change the red string here : it's dangerous and we don't unedrstand fully the consequences. On something with global effects, it's just a desperate bet, I'd rather not take it.
This is not chem trails per se they are purposely spraying calcium carbonate, sulfur, alumina, and other metals for a specific purpose to mimic volcanic activity to block sun to cool the earth The experiment has failed they are heating the earth and waters and they continue to do it we are doomed if people don’t do something
Arrest them all pilots to and hold them all on chemical war crimes against humanity give them no amnesty and all those who cover this crime up. They been doing this for decades.
This technology is insane. I live in Scandinavia. We need all the rare sun we can get after such long and dark winters. I have worked on the Great Barrier Reef too. Humans and life on earth need sunlight. It drives our biological systems.
@J Silva Myb YOU need to accept things as they are and shut up because you know nothing about this experimental solution. Are you the one who is forcing people to vaccinate themselves even thought you don't know what long term side effects are going to be? I hate sheeps who just jump and do what ever others want them to do without thinking, that's why humanity suffers
@J Silva blocking sunlight anywhere in the world is just a bad idea. Just to give you a couple of examples, it gives humans vitamin d and helps boost serotonin in the brain and plants rely of sunlight for photosynthesis. Not to mention solar power would be less effective. I believe the sense of urgency is overhyped alot as well, but I'm not a scientist, so what would I know. (FYI - I'm from Australia)
@J Silva Yes, it's fall here now (we call it autumn). Well, Australia is known for being hot, but the summer we just had wasn't as hot as other summers we've had and minimal bushfires this year as well. I mean, we still had days of over 40°C, but it was stagnant, where usually we get a couple of 'heatwaves' each summer, with a week or more of 45°C days and only dropping to mid 20s at night. It was more humid than hot, if that makes sense haha. In saying that, I've noticed that the intensity of our climate is on a cycle lasting around 10 - 12 years. I'm of the opinion that, 1.5°c warming averaged over the whole planet isn't going to dramatically change the climate. The earth is very versatile and will adapt to balance out the conditions over time, historically c02 was more than 5 times today's levels, but on the point of cycles, a long term example of this is when earth experiences 'ice ages' every 50,000 years or so. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for having cleaner energy and less emissions etc. But I don't think going to zero emissions will stop the climate from changing.
@J Silva I am a biologist, and I am a global citizen. I have lived in the tropics and still do. My comment was an educated one not a selfish one. I have spent my entire life educating others about the natural world and how precious it is. Have you? Sunlight and cold are different things. Life on earth needs sunlight. I am guessing you are uneducated and part of the problem.
The risks are too high. Knowing how human beings behave, we are definitely going to rely 100% on the geo engineering and not cut emissions. This sounds like the last resort to temporarily delay the end rather than a solution, but not that we have any solution right now. Politicians only care about their next election and that’s it, extremely simple minded. Majority of human beings only care about the immediate future and not the long term. This natural selfish behavior of human beings is the reason why we are where we are now, destroying the environment for the benefit of their own generation to enjoy life while making it impossible for their children and the next generation to survive and thrive. One would think a global disaster like global warming will bring society and countries together and more United, less conflict. It’s seems the complete opposite, more war, conflict, less trust, less cooperation.
Why so much deceit? Geoengineering has been going on for years, I discovered the criss-crossed skies in 2014 and connected the dots. It's been the longest eight years of my life trying to wake people up to these atrocities on earth's atmosphere which has almost completely decimated the ozone.
That’s what I ask people as well. Even scientists who speak honestly about irreversible climate change and say that it’s game over, still stop at talking about the elephant in the sky. It really is every wo/man for themselves, you have to find out the truth for yourself, can’t expect the “experts” to be honest about anything.
The idea of people trying to control the climate through adding something to the atmosphere is terrifying. There are so many ways for this to go wrong and the fact that it would need to be done on such large scale really does make me think doomsday immediately. If geo engineering was focused on what can we extract from the environment that humans have put there or increased I would be able to get onboard with further exploration.
That's a funny statement. We are already adding 'something' to the atmosphere that is affecting the climate. It's already gone wrong and doomsday is probably a forgone conclusion.
@@themechanictangerine yes we have added trillions of tons of carbon to the atmosphere my point is instead of focusing on adding to solve the problem our basis for geo engineering should be focused on what can we remove from the atmosphere our environment. I.e carbon capture … removing micro plastic from the ocean.
Why can't humans just solve Climate Change the right way, rather than solving 1 problem with more problems. Plant trees stop deforestation clean the ocean recycle stop wasting switch to green energy. It’s not hard
It can be done, but the oil companies won`t allowed, they have many people working politically and many people convinced that there's no problem at all, so they can get his money to live in the moon or in subterranean bunkers maybe.
People are too indoctrinated with economics and individualism in general. Stopping mindless growth and generally doing things that benefit people outside your country are frowned upon in the current society.
Weather in London is definitely been changed dull and cold even when sun tries to shine ,these lines in sky are criss cross everywhere, if passenger jets flew like this ,there would be collisions.
"We shouldn't research alternative solutions to the problem because then we might not try as hard to solve the problem the current way" is absolutely mental as an argument & I do not understand how or why it was given any weight at all
Nature have a mechanism, which corrects itself. Predicting the exact outcome would be a trickiest part, if you wanna tamper with this mechanism (considering every possible variables into account) or else it could trigger process of self-annihilation.
The 'climate change" pseudoscience maniacs and those manipulated by them and paid by them don't want to understand this simple fact, and they don't want others to understand it.
We have sun dimming for at least 2.5 years in extreme form. During March 2020 no planes in the sky. Blue skies and high temps. No rain. Here in Western Europe as soon as the planes began to fly, only rain, hailstones, snow 🌨 in March and April 2023 where there was no snowing before. Very low temperatures with minus 3 degrees in the night in april 2023. Crops are freezing. Only gray skies. Everywhere very gloomy. Even in Venice where there are blue skies. In 2021 huge floods and hailstones with apocalypse like winds all through Europe. Crazy natural disasters in Turkije. Man made. They are applying geoengineering on world wide scale for decades but after the p l andemic it went skyrocketing. 🌨️🌍😬
I'd like to know the carbon footprint of the amount of Aircraft used to dim out the sun. Everyday, there are thousands of aircrafts flying dumping chemicals and my question is how much fuel is being used????
They are already geo engineering in the uk and it’s causing us to have constant cloudy days and darkness, doesn’t seem to matter how it affecting the health of the people who are being deprived of essential sunlight 😢
Average world cloud coverage has gone down from 65 to 62% since 2000, the world is getting sunnier not cloudier, england has always had one of the lowest yearly sunshine hours.
@@alegomanYTPsOP didn’t capitalise UK. Gave no evidence for their assertions. Funny how you didn’t consider them to be a ‘bot hired to spread lies’ Seems that you call people ‘bots’ depending simply on whether or not their words conflict with your beliefs/ politics
@sandponics “nothing has changed” The multigenerational UK farmers I work with, my 60 years of experience, and the Met office, all say otherwise. So excuse me for not listening to your anecdotes. No one is saying that the climate here is not damp, so the Romans having a damp time of it compared to the Mediterranean/Adriatic/Ionian climates of the time is no surprise whatsoever.
when i watch youtube clips on problems humanity face to advance, I am filled with hope listening to people with intelligent ideas, achievements of scientist, than I watch the news and walk out of my house reality of our society hits me like a high speed train, all hopes dissepear in a flash...
Those persisting stratospheric clouds made by jet aircraft are quite visible often covering much of the sky where I live, and it's a low population area with few commercial flights. They *blanket* the atmosphere up to the stratosphere where there are usually few clouds. The atmosphere thus blanketed, being warmer to way up there, disrupts the global wind circulations. The chaotic jet streams bring warm air up over Greenland melting the glaciers, and Arctic winds flow down making extra cold winters in places down almost to the tropics (notably Texas last year), and of course we are seeing super hot summers. The other effect is that the warm air can hold far more moisture to a higher altitude, so it doesn't rain where and when it usually does, and when it finally lets go, it's "rivers from the sky" with floods that wash away cars and cows. Or giant hail stones. It does decrease insolation: nice sunny days become hazy and solar panel output drops way down. But the blanketing effect makes the world warmer, not colder, just like any cloudy night is milder than a clear night. PS: The example volcanic ash that reduces temperatures? It's DARK colored. The clouds they think will have the same cooling effect are WHITE!
This was dark comedy. It's horrifying how delusional we still are about what we're in for. The solution still is what it always was, but it's getting less effective the longer we wait. Use, do, and consume less. That also means allowing plant life and ecosystems alone to do their work. But we do the polar opposite and think "doing more and more" will somehow save us. Putting out our fire with more fossil fuel. How about do not do?
I agree with you Carlo. The following 4 lines are my idea about correcting our behavior towards the Environment B4 doing anything else. "Climate change's" cause: Profit = income - expenses. Erroneous, because it fails to recognize the environment as the only source of our sustenance, or true Profit. The Solution is: Profit = our gratefulness and loving care for the Environment, and for the sustenance that it provides for all of us. We must create a world economy that supports this new dictionary definition of "Profit". P.S. We must hurry! It may be too late, but it's never too late to try. Stop treating the environment like an expense and start treating it like our true and only Profit. Stop burning the paycheck. Let's change our behavior 1st.
I think this last pandemic has proven the devastating effects of man monkeying with nature by radical, all-encompassing and irreversible "solutions". I've had enough. The science should be very humble and implement any man-made change gradually and only after small-size trials. A lot of things could go wrong; why risk it all on one lucky strike? I think geo-engineering is a bad idea for the wellbeing of humans.
@@patrickbodine1300 ...The scientists consensus ? The multiple studies published? The leaked studies from Exxon and Shell that confirm they knew this since 1980? The IPCC reports?
While I appreciate the sentiment behind the Saami objections to this technology, at the rate things are going it will be the only roll of the dice we have left. Oil companies, buoyed by record high oil prices, are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars DAILY on oil and gas exploration. Governments across the planet are not only dragging their feet on fighting climate change, but are approving these new oil and gas megaprojects as fast as they can, while they line their own pockets. Let's face it, things are only getting worse, and as more people die from heat or starvation and sea levels keep rising, there may be nothing else left to try to save ourselves.
As an oceanographer I have to disagree. How does the earth naturally sequester carbon back to the geologic cycle? It is mostly through algal photosynthesis in the ocean. The limiting factor in most oceanic systems right now is either light or nutrients. If we decrease light we decrease algae and then we ironically slow down natural carbon sequestration. Oceanographers have been screaming for years that these sulfur projects are asinine.
@@jazzys4390 I'm not an oceanographer so lack the expertise to counter your argument. If we are to save ourselves from climate change, there are clearly no easy answers.
@@SmashPhysical I will say that at the end of the video when they talked about using water particles to cool down the great barrier reef locally it isn't a terrible idea because locally the tropics arent light limited and are actually nutrient limited. My fear is that particles like sulfur could make it to temperate oceans where a lack of light would severely decrease photosynthesis.
This very vid being made by Economist clearly demonstrates that geoengineering already is seen as option having potential to help us get out of trouble. Emissions' total are already way over what might be considered safe. Now Big Economy finally accepts that them pesky environmentalists were right all along, and they also realize stabilizing, let alone _decreasing_ emissions is almost impossible, especially since the Economist clients still wish to make money - _lots of it, can we_ . Climate change is unrolling so fast anyway, that geoengineering will be seen as the extra measures needed to try get things in check. The masters of the world , either political or business, will look more at them with every climate related incident hitting the Markets - err, I mean, People. So, prepare for headlines and public debates and large scale experiment before 2030
Or maybe it's actually a solution. We have been intervening massively with burning fossil fuels since the steam age in the wrong way. It is possible to run small scale trials for decades to figure these things out even as we decarbonise but if we say no it's too pristine to test this then...
@@joythought maybe isn't not a solution. do you make wishes in every part of your life? we've been burning fossil fuels for over 150 years now and the world has become only more prosperous, healthier, safer. people live longer, have less injuries and ailments, have economically enhanced lives some 10x the standard of living of 1850, and the global poverty rate is declining, along with war and famine you, Sir, are out of touch with reality
@@capeorbobserver3903 Greenhouse gases are the underlying problem and marine cloud brightening is like temporary relief. That's why I say it's like putting Earth on life support. If for some geopolitical reason MCB were to stop, the Earth very quickly heats right back up again, as long as greenhouse gases are still there. MCB can buy time, but it doesn't address the underlying problem.
@@garysarela4431 Well, when you're in hospital and you have a choice between dying or life support, most people choose the life support. If we had plausible progress to stopping climate change (i.e. recovering), then sure. But we don't. So if it's really a crisis that we'd do anything to solve, why isn't think one of the anythings we'd consider?
The planet has been substantially colder. There were multiple "snowball earth" episodes after cyanobacteria invented photosynthesis. Even within the current ice age, it's been colder: we're in an inter-glacial period, or what would have been an inter-glacial period if we weren't putting enough CO2 into circulation to end the ice age.
@@danwylie-sears1134 The record says it’s been as much as 1.2 degrees colder and is normally 35 degrees hotter. That’s the science. The rest is the mighty religion of imbeciles and fools.
Why not harvest our sun's energy instead of deflecting it into space? Why not use the same amount of time, money, brain power, and human might that would be needed to develop the infrastructure needed for effective mass solar geoengineering to instead to develop efficient and profitable methods for harvesting & distributing renewable sources of energy?
Because we've been doing that for 2 decades and have barely gotten anywhere. While some nations have made progress, others have become even more reliant on fossil fuels. Renewable energy is fine and dandy, but it has serious drawbacks when it comes to availability and reliability. It can still be a part of the solution, but we need to be looking at a more comprehensive solution, rather than just focusing 100% on renewable energy like we've been doing. We will have to do something to take carbon out of the atmosphere and the companies that are researching how to do that are getting the same backlash about how taking carbon out of the atmosphere using technology is really just giving fossil fuel companies breathing space to continue existing and producing more fossil fuels. The current suggestion to carbon removal is to plant more trees, however we've been seeing increased deforestation in just about every country with a tropical rainforest. If this issue is as catastrophic as it appears, we will need a comprehensive and diversified approach.
Solar has too many flaws like pollution generated from manufacturing and disposing of them. The next big thing is likely Geothermal energy, it's making a comeback with cheaper, more efficient drilling methods and big oil companies are already investing in it since they already do deep-well drilling.
What we don't realise is the most technology we use the situation is worse. It's kind of digging a big hole to cover a small one. Finally, technology and our mindset brought us all this problems because technology lets us transform nature faster than it can regenerate itself. We just need to stop overconsuming resources and nature will heal itself.
Long term shift in temperature and weather change is from El Niño and La Niña and it also causes droughts like we are seeing today and can go on for years. It is not from human activity and fossils fuel burning. All of the co2 in the atmosphere has already been around on earth. I think the real reason temperature are rising is because the earth produces crude oil for a reason like in cars we use oils to keep temperature from elevating in the motor and to provide a cushion for the crank bearings. I believe the earth use the crude oil in the same way to help keep temperature from elevating but since majority of the oil is been pump out of where it needs to be the earths temperature is raising and is looking for a way to cool it self down so it turns to the water sources to release heat through oceans and the lakes that why were seeing drought all over the place the earth is trying to cool itself
I remember a Saturday in L.A., a few years ago, planes building a crisscross pattern of "water vapor" in the sky. The next Sunday, a strange haze made the weather sunny, but not. It didn't look or feel right. The sun gives needed elemental energy to biological systems, and it is worrisome to think of adding yet another layer of toxic behavior, to cover up other toxic behaviors.
Pause and Look at 0:09 and see how many trees there are, and we know that trees is a huge source for cooling off. We can try cooling off in a house that has no air conditioning and a tree and easily tell witch decision was better. Plus while you stop to take a look at the clip 0:09 ask yourself if Solar panels was on every one of those buildings, how many dollars would the community save??
We need scientists as world leaders to protect our planet, we cannot rely on leaders who less care or don't care about the changes that harms our planet earth
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming now....!!" - 1988 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW...!!" - 1992 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW and tax and spread the wealth...!!" - 1998 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW and tax and spread the wealth and deceive people...!!" - 2005 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure out how to re-spin Global Warming into 'Climate Change' now since it's not warming like we claimed and the polar ice cap hasn't melted....!!" - 2012 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure out how to re-spin 'Climate Change' now since it's snowed like crazy in places, the earth is aggressively-greening due to CO2, droughts are fewer than previous claimed, and the polar ice still hasn't melted....!!" - 2016 "Oh my goodness..!! Trump has been elected, and we'll have to spin lies like crazy to re-establish our sick and lying agenda - 2016 "Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure our how to re-spin our nonsense, since everyone knows that China will never stop consuming fossil fuels and the polar ice still hasn't melted....!!" - 2017 "Oh my goodness..!! We've lied our way into Joe Biden being elected, and we're all saved..!!" - 2020 "Oh my goodness..!! Joe Biden, the leader of the free world, has unnecessarily destroyed America's oil industry, and inappropriately blamed Putin for sky-high gas prices and inflation" - 2022 "Oh my goodness..!! Republicans have a super-majority in leadership, Joe Biden's lies have been exposed, and the American public has learned the truth about the phoniness of Climate Change. We'll have to manufacture another false climate agenda.." - November 2024
Heat moves from high temperature to low temperature. Shades block the energy movement, which is the same for green house gases. Ask physicists why one cools the earth and the other warms the earth.
The avarage "Physisists" these days can't even tell the difference between infared radiaion(red light) and thermal radiation(heat)😏 Convection uses up heat in driving the ocean currents from the equators to the pole and back and evaporation/parcipitation yes up heat making the trade winds,weather,rain and cloud....heat is not trapped or Stored anyhere "Greenhousr Effect" was dipoven by John Tyndal's and Savante's experiments eventualy only finding water as the heat conduit (Hydrological cycle) They like to thump on Tyndall and Savnte in I.P.C.C. but they dont expect the politiins or the aides to follow up on the zources I guess
Someone can correct me if I am missing something, but I think the explanation is that each type of molecule is able to absorb/emit light only when the light has certain specific wavelengths (this has to do with quantum physics). And the light that enters the earth from the sun does not have the same wavelengths as the radiation that is emitted back into space. So the overall effect of putting molecules of a particular type into the atmosphere can be either that the earth is cooled or that it is heated.
Remember when all the Covid-19 lockdowns were going on and people couldn’t go much of anywhere Earth was starting to get cleaner. I remember hearing about a lot less smog in these big cities and some rivers in Europe were getting cleaner also. Since world went back to what it was before now we’re seeing devastating consequences now.
Would have been nice if you had covered space based mirrors too. Very interesting technology that could power the space Industrie and a moon base. It also doesn’t have as many drawbacks as sulfur based approaches.
Yes, at least someone here isn't completely uneducated. Way easier to deorbit a satellite then removing particles from the atmosphere. We should really learn from past mistakes like cfc's
@@atlanciaza Thanks to bring up the cfc example. Dudes act like "wow we can't pull the thing out atmosphere in a couple years" and they basically don't understand how chemicals interact with EVERYTHING I suppose... They think the sea and rain won't be affected by it.
@@BS-vx8dg Depends, on each of the three statements. It may be superior, but cloud brightening as an example might work better. Hard to say without research. Space may be more complicated. Or it may just be a massive very very thin inflatable sun shield that then just floats around in orbit. The pressure needed to inflate it would be almost nothing. Space may be more expensive - or something like Starship may dramatically reduce the price to orbit and suddenly make it very economic. The answer is we don't know, can't know, and don't need to know. The right answer to technological progress is to research everything, because you don't know what works until you try. Picking winners has pretty much always failed. I'm always on the side of people who say "let's research some more" rather than the side of the people who say "don't research that, it's a dead end." How can they know? Progress comes from trying things.
It seems to me that mother nature is doing a cooling right now with so many volcanoes blowing Ash into the atmosphere my fear is extra amount of matter in the atmosphere will throw it into a deep freeze instead of just a cooling down
In case you haven t looked up at the sky lately, they have been doing Stratospheric Aerosol Injections and Solar Radiation Management since WW2, for 75 years already. Its not a proposal. Lyndon Johnson stated "He who controls the weather controls the world". How is that working out so far? After 75 years has geoengineering made your life better or worse???
So let's spray some of those chemicals in the sky with big airplanes and see what happens. Maybe we can even have a cool nickname for it. Maybe because it might end up looking like a condensation trail (contrail), as shown at 1:58, but is chemicals, we could call it a chemical trail (chemtrail). That would be a clever play on words.
It's treated here as if the main question isn't, Will solar dimming help save us from excessive warming?, but, What will be the inequities involved (usually without comparing them to the inequities involved in the absence of doing it)? That is morally bankrupt. Other leaps in logic abound in this short video, too, but that one is enough to show how badly the producers' moral compass is skewed.
@@kylenolan2710 I totally did. All the comparisons were implicitly to a fictional world where we're magically combating global warming. If you assume that we're failing to (we are), then instead of saying "there's a risk that if you ever stopped geo-engineering you'd go off a cliff" you'd say "there's a risk that if we don't start geo-engineering, we'll go off a cliff".
so let me get this straight it can actually but people are getting in the way ...as usually. i think people dont understand its not suppose to be a solution but buy more time to achieve the target goals. Especially if it helps lower GDP countries the most
idk, sulphur breaks up ozone molecules. the people in the rich countries can use suncreams, the poor who are working outside, don't have the money for that.
@@tomo11685 75000 years ago a rather small super volcano erupted wiping out 75% of all live, including all but 1000 females that created the human race. This was due to the sulfur that the volcano spewed into the atmosphere. Because it was so small, the nuclear winter only lasted 2 years. Glaciers formed and it took nearly a century to recover, but it did. Putting sulfur in the atmosphere would lower the planet but it would not last. You would have to do so continually and hope no volcano erupted after you put the sulfur there artificially.
I think that's partially true, but "it can actually" glosses over the real concerns about potential side effects, only some of which are known. That's what the bearded guy is talking about with "termination shock". Earth's ecology is interconnected in ways that are very hard to predict, and Climate Change is caused by humans messing with the atmosphere, so there's no guarantee messing with it in a different way will cancel out and not just create a new problem instead. Analogy Time: You have a fever, and I know hypothermia lowers people's body temperature, so I put an icepack on your head. This helps a little with no obvious downsides, but the fever doesn't break, so I go all in and toss you into a snowdrift. This does lower your temp and alleviate some symptoms, but it doesn't cure the infection causing the fever, and while I'm keeping an eye out for signs of hypothermia, because I've never done this before I don't know about frost bite nor how to treat it, so you end up loosing a foot. It'd be better to have given you an icepack and then stuck to addressing the infection directly by gathering enough antibiotics to slow and eventually reduce it. It's hard to know from just small scale tests and cloud brightening (the icepacks) whether worldwide solar-geo-engineering would be a larger icepack or a full-body snowdrift. I think it's worth looking into, and research may show us the worst side effects and how to mitigate them, but it also might not, and there's real risk there. It's easier to talk about what we do know than what we don't, but there's a lot more of the latter, and the environment is far more complicated and interconnected than we can hope to understand (look up "Yellowstone wolves" if you want an example).
@@samuelmelcher "Climate Change is caused by humans messing with the atmosphere" The truth is, we do not know if and how much we have contributed to the climate change. We do know that a lot of it is natural (despite the mmcc religion saying otherwise). IF we start assuming it is all man made and we do thing that will lower the temperature without knowing what we are doing, it is a guarantee of disaster. Scientist say that there is no evidence of a future disaster due to co2 increases.
So they want to release these chemicals with planes in a matter that would cause chemtrails? They act like they are just now wanting to do it and haven't already done it for years.
Talking about stocks, Forex trading/ investment is the most profitable venture I ever invested in, I reached my goalof $120k monthly trade earnings. wondering if viewers here are familiar with Lucy's trading platform
@Dov zigler You don't need to be surprised because I'm also a huge beneficiary of expert Mrs Lucy trading service, I'm winning consistently trading with with her
there's a super bright white paint that if everybody painted their house roofs with it their houses would stay cooler and it would reflect the heat back into the atmosphere. ❤️
Yes, I can see why the Sami would not want research into how Morocco could geo-engineer their local (and incidentally global) mean temperature for a few million dollars a year. Aside, I have worked on coal mines and I believe mining and burning coal is evil. Also aside, as a Chemical Engineer, lowering global mean temperature is far easier than raising it. At some point we're going to have to put our big person pants on and stop patronising, despite how effective the 'argument from authority' has been to date.
I encourage you to watch the documentary "The Dimming" on youtube. It exposes the global climate engineering operations in their entirety and the consequences they are having on the web of life.
The woman from the Saami counsel is entitled to object to having the experiment take place over her people's land, and there could be negative side effects from attempting to influence the Earth's climate. But I hard disagree with what she said about geoengineering being a substitute for climate action. We won't hit our Paris target (for 2030 there is zero chance, maybe better for 2050) so we should definitely be pursuing an emergency plan B.
I fully agree, Spacetweek! The problem is that there is talk, talk, talk but very little action undertaken. The last idea, the one with the sea spray over the Great Barrier Reef sounds more applicable than the others.
What she meant is that if geoengineering became a thing then industries and politicians who are making dollars from the non-renewables industry would push for it to further pollute the earth. Sure, the emissions won't raise the temperature of the earth, but the air quality will plummet because corporations have a safety net and that is geo engineering. That's the biggest worry. Companies and politicians always find a way to use things that save lives into something that fuels their wallet.
Considering that the current high-altitude spraying programs use aluminum dioxide and other metals which are toxic to humans, I would say, yes, it is too risky. Most people are completely unaware that this has been underway for decades.
There are no current programmes.
There are other alternatives non-toxic particles.
What happens when the sun heats the metals in our atmosphere, what happens when we breath these metals. I think we are watching the side-effects of geoengneering .
Prophet … you are wrong it has been happening full force since Dec 2022 why don’t you look up for once you should be enraged at what they are doing and it is no coincidence that 2023 was the hottest year ever recorded for earth,… their experiment has failed and they are heating the earth and waters, and they are claiming they dont know why this major jump in water temp has happened, they are lying to you
Operation Popeye yeah it isn't it funny when they come out of the woodwork and say there aren't any programs lol 😅
When humans have tried to be better or wanted to play with nature rule
Nature has always showed humans who's the boss here
Exactly, and I hope she fights back with a vengeance!!
One could argue the changes in agriculture and other areas which have resulted in the higher living standards of modern society are all down to bettering nature. We changed crop yields and quality by natural selection, modified our environment to be suitable for fields and changed our role in relation to nature. Humans innately modify and attempt to better nature, sometimes to our own determent, but other times to our benefit 🙂
ya just like what just happened with huricane Helene
See the documentary The Dimming. They're not just exploring the idea. They've been doing it for years.
I think they're experimenting in PR. It's been unnaturally hazy lately and we had a couple of rain storms during dry seas9n.
One only needs to watch the evening weather forecast to realize how much we don't understand how our earth works. How can you seriously think about altering something when you have no idea what all your consequences will be? The unforeseen problems would be catastrophic with no ability to rewind when it goes wrong. "Well that didn't go as planned" or "ooops sorry" are not phrases we want to hear from a group of scientist as we're plunged into total darkness. No, just no, bad idea.
The consequences are already here with all the fire incidents occurring in Spain and other parts of Europe.
Very well said...
@@ghada.El.Khoury fires are part of natures way of cleaning up and we only pay more attention to them cause we move and build in the forest. This is a terrible idea that has no off switch and when it goes bad we're stuck with the consequences. No, just no.
Such is the folly of man. Driven by hubris to believe they are the masters of the universe and everything is within their control. Scientists should stop tinkering with forces beyond their control lest they unleash consequences beyond their imagination.
Our skies are being sprayed every day do you not notice the chemtrails everywhere?
It is not risky: it is utterly insane...
is it more insane than not using solar radiation management?
Anton that is BS they are doing it as we speak since Dec 2022 two years into their 5 year plan and heating the earth and waters at a rapid pace now, the climate issue is a fraud and they are now causing extreme heat and flooding all over the world then blaming climate change
Cooling by geo-engineering has been happening for years already. I live in British Columbia, Canada. During the COVID lockout there were no commercial flights but the sky was crossed by a huge number of aircrafts with very long trace of condensed gas; immediately after clouds started to form and in a few hours cloudiness covered the previous beautiful blue sky. I am wondering if the aluminum colloidal particles spayed by those aircrafts deposited on trees were the cause of the wildest fires in the boreal forests of western Canada and the US, since aluminum is a very flammable metal at particle level.
Aluminium also makes a fine hat.
Seriously did Canada have planes doing this during lockdown because in UK we had constant clear blue sky almost every day with no commercial flights and No cloud seeding at all
Just goes to show how much more corrupt Canada is from UK
@grindupBakerLies, I just read a book where they say it's the fire salamanders. And the rains are provoked by planes but piloted by Sylphs, obviously the hard work is mainly pulled by the Undines who have to dive to bring water droplets to BC.
Aliminium spraying =
dementia, in humans & bees
That’s definitely a possibility.
I'm shocked at the number of people who have never heard of these "plans" that are already in use.
For 75+ years…
All anyone needs to do is do a search of weather modification or geoengineering and you will find many documents and patents on weather modification proving they are already on going massive programs that have been going on for 75 years.
I'm sick of planes filling the sky's with chemicals everday
@@rodgie84 yes chemicals like water vapor
@@santiagovelamorales1029 what they have Internet in Brazil now?
I think we urgently need to retrace our steps of how we got here and dedicate more resources into undoing all that harm, hopefully our grandchildren will see the benefits. I feel like we would be creating more imbalances using these technologies and would make the problem worse. It takes energy to implement all these solutions and we're not doing to great on that. Imagine stopping this after 30 years due to a lack of energy. The consequences would be disastruous. Please don't.
science says it's safe so no more denial please
Science flies you to the moon, religion into skyscrapers.
@@antireligionwhyreligionmus2819 so you think they flew the planes into the towers strictly for religious purposes? That’s false, it was payback and an attempt to collapse financial system.
Wow, the audience here is broad, educated and most people seem to agree with this comment, I think.
That's horrible. Look at us fearing progress. Look at us hoping to go backwards. When was the last time we were so afraid of our own potential?
Climate manipulation is already being done but to deliberately cause more problems and push more farmers into going broke and you into starvation so you become more compliant.
Hope that engineers consult with geologists to fully understand planetary dynamics, and Snowball Earth. In the geological record, Earth was in most cases an ice cube of a plant with little to no life. Also, reducing the amount of sunlight will reduce plant growth, affecting food production, and other unintended consequences.
Science flies you to the moon, religion into skyscrapers.
Has been " reducing " / destroying & toxifying All Life, 4 many decades & still ONGOING.
Patented CE, since 1947.
In the Skies above you 2022, Day & Night.
🙏
Snowball Earth was a couple of billion years ago, we are in an ice age cycle today now. Earth is going through the warming part of the cycle that comes just before the cooling. The ice period is coming back no matter what we do.
Geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades. The media lies and says that they might need to deploy it. This fact desperately needs to be exposed to the public if we are to stop it.
I encourage you to watch the documentary "the dimming" on youtube. It fully exposes these programs for what they are.
They've already been doing this since WW2. Do any of you LOOK UP? It is ALREADY killing the world.
A solution to a problem almost always creates another. The benefit depends on how well you manage the following consequences.
Penicillin was great but now we have to deal with super microbes.
Same goes for how companies told us to use plastics to protect from the overuse of paper/killing trees
Bio-engineered crop designed to act as a pesticide itself to protect from cropeater 1, successfully killed it when it tried to munch on the crop and hence BioE-crop achieved its purpose. But cropeater 1 who also used to eat cropeater 2 is now no more, so now cropeater 2 takes his place and gets to eat the crop, As you can see that, certain crop ecosystem have new boss with new rules. As a final result, nothing changed, infact situation became worse than before.
@@korinostream
Humans are the crop-eater # 2
Our technology is suicide in the long run.
@Perseus Arkouda - Solutions to fake "problems" are definitely a skam to manipulate and hypercontrol us. _THAT_ is what it is really all about.
That's mostly due to massive overuse of antibiotics by factory farming.
They are doing it and blaming you. Priceless 🤣 🦎
It's not happening, its actually banned under the 2010 UN Convention on Biological Diversity, over 500 scientists and experts are calling for a formal solar geoengineering non-use agreement, even though as they say it's still speculative technology not in use.
About This Initiative - Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement
Mexico refuses to do it, but we are doing it and there will be alot of death , haven’t you looked up the past two years probably not, nose is always in the phone, they are counting on people like you not to notice
@@jime2504 It is actually happening, in South Spain it became obvious since the beginning of the year. Almost every day we see on the sky.
The biggest risk here is humans themselves. Imagine having the problem temporarily solved, but people got complacent that we continued doing what we're doing, then when the temporary solution broke down or expires, we end up being far worse than where we started
They didn't want to give up their taxes, governments, monkey go-carts and meaty treats, they blamed other nations and the billionaires. Astroturf the garden and fly to NZ for a weekend break on a speedbird.
This idea far left wing dumb satanic communist agenda. Very dangerous to block the sun. Also this is going to make billionaires trillionres and hard working tax payers have to pay for their projects. Remember global warming happens once every few hundred years and that's nothing worry about.
Solar cycles are the problem 😊
@@wobblybobengland They blamed the billionaires for a reason. 100 companies are responsible for more than 70% of CO2 emissions. Ecocid is occurring ecocid is capitalist and there is no capitalist solution to a capitalist ecocid. That’s what a lot of people think in France maybe in US you are too brainwashed about capitalism to understand .
Also, this temporary “solution” could never be considered a fix because it also ignores the absolutely massive problem of ocean acidification which has nothing to do with heat but with CO2 being absorbed into the oceans. The only option to try and begin to unfuck ourselves is to stop polluting. We need many different ideas and millions of people working on this problem from every angle, it’s the only way forward for us.
Aren’t we just treating the symptom, and not addressing the root cause?
Messing with a system so nonlinear and we know so little about is dangerous. This shading proposal is almost saying that a nuclear winter is a blessing.
Proponents of geoengineering projects would argue that addressing those symptoms can give us more time to address the root causes (reducing greenhouse gasses emissions, and removing enormous quantities of carbon from the atmosphere).
We appear to be moving in the right direction of lowering carbon emissions, but we might not get there fast enough to avoid catastrophic climate change unless we also lean on some form of geoengineering as an interim solution while we finish decarbonizing our energy production and pulling enough carbon from the atmosphere to make that interim solution no longer necessary.
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀..
Thanks for watching
No; you treat both; as is common with many illnesses.
Precisely :)
The idea of Solar geoengineering is suicidal, it will disrupt rainfall patterns all across the world especially affecting countries that depend on monsoon rainfall for food production like India, and reducing the rate of photosynthesis in plants as a direct consequence of global dimming, causing acute food crisis all over the world.
Its been going on for 20 years. Go look up at the sky.
Aaaand you got these studies from where? 🤨
coool opportunity for more power grab
Sorry but what you speak of is actually happening globally NOW, Go and research David Keith thoroughly....a sinister man.
They've been geoengineering for decades. Please w a t c h & share T h e D I M M I N G (documentary)
Blocking sun rays is tantamount to imminent death, agriculture could suffer & it'll give birth to new diseases
Err, how would it give birth to new diseases exactly?
@@user-1281 by destroying immunity - and viruses thrive in absence of sunlight.
@@user-1281 Vit D carency, melatonin erratic secretion, effect of the products used to cause the shade etc..
We don't know how or what the effect on human body can be. So it is a risky bet. Reducing our GHG is way safer.
@@etienne8110 Not exactly new is it though?
Edit: except the thing about products shading the earth
@@user-1281 If you want to argue on the "new" then fine, your win.
Doesn't really change the red string here : it's dangerous and we don't unedrstand fully the consequences. On something with global effects, it's just a desperate bet, I'd rather not take it.
Chemtrails.... They've been doing it for decades
This is not chem trails per se they are purposely spraying calcium carbonate, sulfur, alumina, and other metals for a specific purpose to mimic volcanic activity to block sun to cool the earth The experiment has failed they are heating the earth and waters and they continue to do it we are doomed if people don’t do something
This was literally what happened in the Matrix.
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching!
I was thinking that too, they blacked out the sky so the machines couldn't use solar power
Listen we have to rely on technology for the solutions to our problems. I say plug me in baby
And WW III
snowpiercer
Arrest them all pilots to and hold them all on chemical war crimes against humanity give them no amnesty and all those who cover this crime up. They been doing this for decades.
This technology is insane. I live in Scandinavia. We need all the rare sun we can get after such long and dark winters. I have worked on the Great Barrier Reef too. Humans and life on earth need sunlight. It drives our biological systems.
But I hate electric cars !!
@J Silva Myb YOU need to accept things as they are and shut up because you know nothing about this experimental solution. Are you the one who is forcing people to vaccinate themselves even thought you don't know what long term side effects are going to be? I hate sheeps who just jump and do what ever others want them to do without thinking, that's why humanity suffers
@J Silva blocking sunlight anywhere in the world is just a bad idea. Just to give you a couple of examples, it gives humans vitamin d and helps boost serotonin in the brain and plants rely of sunlight for photosynthesis.
Not to mention solar power would be less effective.
I believe the sense of urgency is overhyped alot as well, but I'm not a scientist, so what would I know.
(FYI - I'm from Australia)
@J Silva Yes, it's fall here now (we call it autumn). Well, Australia is known for being hot, but the summer we just had wasn't as hot as other summers we've had and minimal bushfires this year as well. I mean, we still had days of over 40°C, but it was stagnant, where usually we get a couple of 'heatwaves' each summer, with a week or more of 45°C days and only dropping to mid 20s at night. It was more humid than hot, if that makes sense haha. In saying that, I've noticed that the intensity of our climate is on a cycle lasting around 10 - 12 years.
I'm of the opinion that, 1.5°c warming averaged over the whole planet isn't going to dramatically change the climate. The earth is very versatile and will adapt to balance out the conditions over time, historically c02 was more than 5 times today's levels, but on the point of cycles, a long term example of this is when earth experiences 'ice ages' every 50,000 years or so.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for having cleaner energy and less emissions etc. But I don't think going to zero emissions will stop the climate from changing.
@J Silva I am a biologist, and I am a global citizen. I have lived in the tropics and still do. My comment was an educated one not a selfish one. I have spent my entire life educating others about the natural world and how precious it is. Have you? Sunlight and cold are different things. Life on earth needs sunlight. I am guessing you are uneducated and part of the problem.
Aren't they already Geoengeneering the whole planet? Why the debate, look up!
The risks are too high. Knowing how human beings behave, we are definitely going to rely 100% on the geo engineering and not cut emissions. This sounds like the last resort to temporarily delay the end rather than a solution, but not that we have any solution right now. Politicians only care about their next election and that’s it, extremely simple minded. Majority of human beings only care about the immediate future and not the long term. This natural selfish behavior of human beings is the reason why we are where we are now, destroying the environment for the benefit of their own generation to enjoy life while making it impossible for their children and the next generation to survive and thrive. One would think a global disaster like global warming will bring society and countries together and more United, less conflict. It’s seems the complete opposite, more war, conflict, less trust, less cooperation.
Why so much deceit? Geoengineering has been going on for years, I discovered the criss-crossed skies in 2014 and connected the dots. It's been the longest eight years of my life trying to wake people up to these atrocities on earth's atmosphere which has almost completely decimated the ozone.
Exactly
That’s what I ask people as well. Even scientists who speak honestly about irreversible climate change and say that it’s game over, still stop at talking about the elephant in the sky. It really is every wo/man for themselves, you have to find out the truth for yourself, can’t expect the “experts” to be honest about anything.
@@meerkatreserve7543 If you speak out the truth in academies, you'll end up like Guy McPherson.
Whenever I talk about it I am looked as a conspiracy theorist. It’s crazy. Everyday I see more chemicals being used again us.
Why exactly would the world want to secretly spray chemicals all over us?
The idea of people trying to control the climate through adding something to the atmosphere is terrifying. There are so many ways for this to go wrong and the fact that it would need to be done on such large scale really does make me think doomsday immediately. If geo engineering was focused on what can we extract from the environment that humans have put there or increased I would be able to get onboard with further exploration.
I tell you even more. This thing has been going for decades now. They just don’t need to hide it anymore.
That's a funny statement. We are already adding 'something' to the atmosphere that is affecting the climate. It's already gone wrong and doomsday is probably a forgone conclusion.
Like adding trillions of tons of CO2 to the atmosphere?
Look up,
Dane Wigington
@@themechanictangerine yes we have added trillions of tons of carbon to the atmosphere my point is instead of focusing on adding to solve the problem our basis for geo engineering should be focused on what can we remove from the atmosphere our environment. I.e carbon capture … removing micro plastic from the ocean.
wow - very eye opening, glad we haven't been doing this for decades
Why can't humans just solve Climate Change the right way, rather than solving 1 problem with more problems. Plant trees stop deforestation clean the ocean recycle stop wasting switch to green energy. It’s not hard
It can be done, but the oil companies won`t allowed, they have many people working politically and many people convinced that there's no problem at all, so they can get his money to live in the moon or in subterranean bunkers maybe.
People are too indoctrinated with economics and individualism in general. Stopping mindless growth and generally doing things that benefit people outside your country are frowned upon in the current society.
WE DID NOT START THIS LYING PROBLEM THEY HAVE ITS ALL MADE UP THEY ARE CAUSING IT
Weather in London is definitely been changed dull and cold even when sun tries to shine ,these lines in sky are criss cross everywhere, if passenger jets flew like this ,there would be collisions.
The metals being disseminated in the aerosol do fall to Earth over time. We then breathe them , drink them, and eat them.
"We shouldn't research alternative solutions to the problem because then we might not try as hard to solve the problem the current way" is absolutely mental as an argument & I do not understand how or why it was given any weight at all
Nature have a mechanism, which corrects itself. Predicting the exact outcome would be a trickiest part, if you wanna tamper with this mechanism (considering every possible variables into account) or else it could trigger process of self-annihilation.
The 'climate change" pseudoscience maniacs and those manipulated by them and paid by them don't want to understand this simple fact, and they don't want others to understand it.
We're already on a process of self-annihilation.
We have sun dimming for at least 2.5 years in extreme form. During March 2020 no planes in the sky. Blue skies and high temps. No rain. Here in Western Europe as soon as the planes began to fly, only rain, hailstones, snow 🌨 in March and April 2023 where there was no snowing before. Very low temperatures with minus 3 degrees in the night in april 2023. Crops are freezing. Only gray skies. Everywhere very gloomy. Even in Venice where there are blue skies. In 2021 huge floods and hailstones with apocalypse like winds all through Europe. Crazy natural disasters in Turkije. Man made. They are applying geoengineering on world wide scale for decades but after the p l andemic it went skyrocketing. 🌨️🌍😬
C'mon man, you've been applying this madness for years, cause the problem first then provide the solution, game over.
💊->🤪
I'd like to know the carbon footprint of the amount of Aircraft used to dim out the sun. Everyday, there are thousands of aircrafts flying dumping chemicals and my question is how much fuel is being used????
A down side to shading the earth? Gee I dunno. How about PLANTS NEED SUNLIGHT!
They are already geo engineering in the uk and it’s causing us to have constant cloudy days and darkness, doesn’t seem to matter how it affecting the health of the people who are being deprived of essential sunlight 😢
Average world cloud coverage has gone down from 65 to 62% since 2000, the world is getting sunnier not cloudier, england has always had one of the lowest yearly sunshine hours.
@@albin4323 have you got any evidence to back that up? I don’t think farmers would agree with you, also what rainfall?
@@bobbymac1319 He didn't even capitalize England so probably not, just another bot hired to spread lies.
@@alegomanYTPsOP didn’t capitalise UK. Gave no evidence for their assertions. Funny how you didn’t consider them to be a ‘bot hired to spread lies’
Seems that you call people ‘bots’ depending simply on whether or not their words conflict with your beliefs/ politics
@sandponics “nothing has changed”
The multigenerational UK farmers I work with, my 60 years of experience, and the Met office, all say otherwise. So excuse me for not listening to your anecdotes. No one is saying that the climate here is not damp, so the Romans having a damp time of it compared to the Mediterranean/Adriatic/Ionian climates of the time is no surprise whatsoever.
when i watch youtube clips on problems humanity face to advance, I am filled with hope listening to people with intelligent ideas, achievements of scientist, than I watch the news and walk out of my house reality of our society hits me like a high speed train, all hopes dissepear in a flash...
Excellent comment, except for the typo at the end - “…. all hopes disappear in a FLUSH…” (or 10 flushes, if you’re TFG) 😂
We have been geo engineering for years this is BS .
You are right my friend they've been doing it for quite a while now I agree this video is b*******
@Alex I don't do drugs or alcohol open your eyes and look up and try watching the Deming it's free on TH-cam
@Alex
Those persisting stratospheric clouds made by jet aircraft are quite visible often covering much of the sky where I live, and it's a low population area with few commercial flights. They *blanket* the atmosphere up to the stratosphere where there are usually few clouds. The atmosphere thus blanketed, being warmer to way up there, disrupts the global wind circulations. The chaotic jet streams bring warm air up over Greenland melting the glaciers, and Arctic winds flow down making extra cold winters in places down almost to the tropics (notably Texas last year), and of course we are seeing super hot summers. The other effect is that the warm air can hold far more moisture to a higher altitude, so it doesn't rain where and when it usually does, and when it finally lets go, it's "rivers from the sky" with floods that wash away cars and cows. Or giant hail stones.
It does decrease insolation: nice sunny days become hazy and solar panel output drops way down. But the blanketing effect makes the world warmer, not colder, just like any cloudy night is milder than a clear night.
PS: The example volcanic ash that reduces temperatures? It's DARK colored. The clouds they think will have the same cooling effect are WHITE!
@@craigcarmichael5748 ash blocks sunlight not because it’s black but because it‘s ASH. White reflects sunlight literally yes.
This was dark comedy. It's horrifying how delusional we still are about what we're in for. The solution still is what it always was, but it's getting less effective the longer we wait. Use, do, and consume less. That also means allowing plant life and ecosystems alone to do their work. But we do the polar opposite and think "doing more and more" will somehow save us. Putting out our fire with more fossil fuel. How about do not do?
Since we can't go back to the stone age or consume less in only 50 years, we must "do more and more" in order for the umanity to survive.
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching!
I agree with you Carlo. The following 4 lines are my idea about correcting our behavior towards the Environment B4 doing anything else.
"Climate change's" cause: Profit = income - expenses. Erroneous, because it fails to recognize the environment as the only source of our sustenance, or
true Profit. The Solution is: Profit = our gratefulness and loving care for the Environment, and for the sustenance that it provides for all of us.
We must create a world economy that supports this new dictionary definition of "Profit". P.S. We must hurry! It may be too late, but it's never too late to try.
Stop treating the environment like an expense and start treating it like our true and only Profit. Stop burning the paycheck. Let's change our behavior 1st.
Only a poor person would suggest something so crazy. I want money🤑 and big plane! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
I think this last pandemic has proven the devastating effects of man monkeying with nature by radical, all-encompassing and irreversible "solutions". I've had enough. The science should be very humble and implement any man-made change gradually and only after small-size trials. A lot of things could go wrong; why risk it all on one lucky strike? I think geo-engineering is a bad idea for the wellbeing of humans.
We have had global pandemics at the start of every global minimum so this one was no different it will just be much deeper!
Unfortunately, it seems that our only hope is a hail-marry pass.
@@terenceiutzi4003 this pandemic was engineered and planned, tough guy
@@RobertMJohnson just like the black plague during the dark ages and the plagues when the earth has cooled every other time?
what about the unintended consequences we can't possibly foresee? this is a large scale global system leave it alone.
📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀..
Thanks for watching
@AvengeVoltaire leave nature alone dude, mankind interferes too much already. Now you want to block out the sun? This is stupidity.
I jumped into the comments expecting a lot of Snowpiercer references but I'm utterly surprised to see little to none.
me too 😂
@@NeilsonBuntowa it's sad to see that the comments are so dry of culture 😂
FYI: the climate has been changing ever since there was a climate.
Just sayin'.
Thanks for proving to be that i havent landed here in the twillight zone
Yeah: the problem is that humans are changing the climate.Are you new here?
@@tinaandro1178 proof?
@@patrickbodine1300 ...The scientists consensus ? The multiple studies published? The leaked studies from Exxon and Shell that confirm they knew this since 1980? The IPCC reports?
@@tinaandro1178 drink some more koolade.
Any geoengineering is really terrifying..
While I appreciate the sentiment behind the Saami objections to this technology, at the rate things are going it will be the only roll of the dice we have left. Oil companies, buoyed by record high oil prices, are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars DAILY on oil and gas exploration. Governments across the planet are not only dragging their feet on fighting climate change, but are approving these new oil and gas megaprojects as fast as they can, while they line their own pockets. Let's face it, things are only getting worse, and as more people die from heat or starvation and sea levels keep rising, there may be nothing else left to try to save ourselves.
As an oceanographer I have to disagree. How does the earth naturally sequester carbon back to the geologic cycle? It is mostly through algal photosynthesis in the ocean. The limiting factor in most oceanic systems right now is either light or nutrients. If we decrease light we decrease algae and then we ironically slow down natural carbon sequestration. Oceanographers have been screaming for years that these sulfur projects are asinine.
@@jazzys4390 I'm not an oceanographer so lack the expertise to counter your argument. If we are to save ourselves from climate change, there are clearly no easy answers.
@@SmashPhysical I will say that at the end of the video when they talked about using water particles to cool down the great barrier reef locally it isn't a terrible idea because locally the tropics arent light limited and are actually nutrient limited. My fear is that particles like sulfur could make it to temperate oceans where a lack of light would severely decrease photosynthesis.
This very vid being made by Economist clearly demonstrates that geoengineering already is seen as option having potential to help us get out of trouble. Emissions' total are already way over what might be considered safe. Now Big Economy finally accepts that them pesky environmentalists were right all along, and they also realize stabilizing, let alone _decreasing_ emissions is almost impossible, especially since the Economist clients still wish to make money - _lots of it, can we_ . Climate change is unrolling so fast anyway, that geoengineering will be seen as the extra measures needed to try get things in check. The masters of the world , either political or business, will look more at them with every climate related incident hitting the Markets - err, I mean, People.
So, prepare for headlines and public debates and large scale experiment before 2030
intervening with complex systems in this way is batshit insane. We have no idea what the secondary etc effects of this will be
Or maybe it's actually a solution. We have been intervening massively with burning fossil fuels since the steam age in the wrong way. It is possible to run small scale trials for decades to figure these things out even as we decarbonise but if we say no it's too pristine to test this then...
That's literally what we're doing right now anyway.
@@joythought maybe isn't not a solution. do you make wishes in every part of your life?
we've been burning fossil fuels for over 150 years now and the world has become only more prosperous, healthier, safer. people live longer, have less injuries and ailments, have economically enhanced lives some 10x the standard of living of 1850, and the global poverty rate is declining, along with war and famine
you, Sir, are out of touch with reality
Marine cloud brightening seems useful and harmless but all the other ideas terribly risky.
📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀.
Thanks for watching!
Marine cloud brightening is like putting the Earth is on permanent life support. We still don't know if carbon capture will ever work at scale.
@@garysarela4431 From the video it seems that mcb is a temporary measure tha can be stopped anytime. So not like permanent life support imho
@@capeorbobserver3903 Greenhouse gases are the underlying problem and marine cloud brightening is like temporary relief. That's why I say it's like putting Earth on life support. If for some geopolitical reason MCB were to stop, the Earth very quickly heats right back up again, as long as greenhouse gases are still there. MCB can buy time, but it doesn't address the underlying problem.
@@garysarela4431 Well, when you're in hospital and you have a choice between dying or life support, most people choose the life support. If we had plausible progress to stopping climate change (i.e. recovering), then sure. But we don't. So if it's really a crisis that we'd do anything to solve, why isn't think one of the anythings we'd consider?
The Earth has never been colder than today’s Ice Age. It’s normally tropical on the poles which is why they are so oil rich.
The planet has been substantially colder. There were multiple "snowball earth" episodes after cyanobacteria invented photosynthesis. Even within the current ice age, it's been colder: we're in an inter-glacial period, or what would have been an inter-glacial period if we weren't putting enough CO2 into circulation to end the ice age.
@@danwylie-sears1134
The record says it’s been as much as 1.2 degrees colder and is normally 35 degrees hotter. That’s the science. The rest is the mighty religion of imbeciles and fools.
Why not harvest our sun's energy instead of deflecting it into space? Why not use the same amount of time, money, brain power, and human might that would be needed to develop the infrastructure needed for effective mass solar geoengineering to instead to develop efficient and profitable methods for harvesting & distributing renewable sources of energy?
That wouldn't make $$$
@@NoOneAM2 Value is subjectively determined. Anything can be profitable if humans collectively decide for it to be. 🌞
@@user-dh7ff1ur4f collectively humans decide nothing.
Because we've been doing that for 2 decades and have barely gotten anywhere. While some nations have made progress, others have become even more reliant on fossil fuels. Renewable energy is fine and dandy, but it has serious drawbacks when it comes to availability and reliability. It can still be a part of the solution, but we need to be looking at a more comprehensive solution, rather than just focusing 100% on renewable energy like we've been doing.
We will have to do something to take carbon out of the atmosphere and the companies that are researching how to do that are getting the same backlash about how taking carbon out of the atmosphere using technology is really just giving fossil fuel companies breathing space to continue existing and producing more fossil fuels. The current suggestion to carbon removal is to plant more trees, however we've been seeing increased deforestation in just about every country with a tropical rainforest.
If this issue is as catastrophic as it appears, we will need a comprehensive and diversified approach.
Solar has too many flaws like pollution generated from manufacturing and disposing of them. The next big thing is likely Geothermal energy, it's making a comeback with cheaper, more efficient drilling methods and big oil companies are already investing in it since they already do deep-well drilling.
We are so arrogant to believe we can nature better than nature?
Political leaders don’t give me much hope about humanity preventing the worst impacts of this.
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching!
The Answer to this question is (Yes) it's to risky. It could inadvertently cause another Ice-age and that's just for starters.
What we don't realise is the most technology we use the situation is worse. It's kind of digging a big hole to cover a small one.
Finally, technology and our mindset brought us all this problems because technology lets us transform nature faster than it can regenerate itself.
We just need to stop overconsuming resources and nature will heal itself.
NO ONE CAN CONTROL THE CLIMATE.
If the amount of sunlight is reduced, what effect do you think it would have on PLANTS.
We’d have no food
Already being done…. Pay attention 🤔
Living things including humans need sunlight.
@@letang6772 how would we ever survive the night?!
Just have it reflect away UV and Infrared light, while letting visible light pass through, this allows us to see while also allowing plants to grow.
…..but they’ve been doing this almost every single day for years! Just look up, for goodness sake. That stuff is NOT condensation.
Glad to hear that climate change is a disputed area of sciences
Long term shift in temperature and weather change is from El Niño and La Niña and it also causes droughts like we are seeing today and can go on for years. It is not from human activity and fossils fuel burning. All of the co2 in the atmosphere has already been around on earth. I think the real reason temperature are rising is because the earth produces crude oil for a reason like in cars we use oils to keep temperature from elevating in the motor and to provide a cushion for the crank bearings. I believe the earth use the crude oil in the same way to help keep temperature from elevating but since majority of the oil is been pump out of where it needs to be the earths temperature is raising and is looking for a way to cool it self down so it turns to the water sources to release heat through oceans and the lakes that why were seeing drought all over the place the earth is trying to cool itself
I remember a Saturday in L.A., a few years ago, planes building a crisscross pattern of "water vapor" in the sky. The next Sunday, a strange haze made the weather sunny, but not. It didn't look or feel right.
The sun gives needed elemental energy to biological systems, and it is worrisome to think of adding yet another layer of toxic behavior, to cover up other toxic behaviors.
Yeah, that's called smog
@@l.baileyjean3719 Hm
Same in Puerto Rico....it's been very hazy lately and it's not normal!
“If” the world is getting too hot.
Where is the scientific data that supports this theory?
Stop spraying the sky What a way to destroy the planet
Pause and Look at 0:09 and see how many trees there are, and we know that trees is a huge source for cooling off. We can try cooling off in a house that has no air conditioning and a tree and easily tell witch decision was better. Plus while you stop to take a look at the clip 0:09 ask yourself if Solar panels was on every one of those buildings, how many dollars would the community save??
We need scientists as world leaders to protect our planet, we cannot rely on leaders who less care or don't care about the changes that harms our planet earth
Xi Jinping has a degree in chemical engineering.
@@xuimod then he must be working in a chemical factory
@@lathapauline1063 he is
@@Batman-mg3dy who is a scientist? 🤔
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming now....!!" - 1988
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW...!!" - 1992
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW and tax and spread the wealth...!!" - 1998
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to solve Global Warming NOW and tax and spread the wealth and deceive people...!!" - 2005
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure out how to re-spin Global Warming into 'Climate Change' now since it's not warming like we claimed and the polar ice cap hasn't melted....!!" - 2012
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure out how to re-spin 'Climate Change' now since it's snowed like crazy in places, the earth is aggressively-greening due to CO2, droughts are fewer than previous claimed, and the polar ice still hasn't melted....!!" - 2016
"Oh my goodness..!! Trump has been elected, and we'll have to spin lies like crazy to re-establish our sick and lying agenda - 2016
"Oh my goodness..!! We have to figure our how to re-spin our nonsense, since everyone knows that China will never stop consuming fossil fuels and the polar ice still hasn't melted....!!" - 2017
"Oh my goodness..!! We've lied our way into Joe Biden being elected, and we're all saved..!!" - 2020
"Oh my goodness..!! Joe Biden, the leader of the free world, has unnecessarily destroyed America's oil industry, and inappropriately blamed Putin for sky-high gas prices and inflation" - 2022
"Oh my goodness..!! Republicans have a super-majority in leadership, Joe Biden's lies have been exposed, and the American public has learned the truth about the phoniness of Climate Change. We'll have to manufacture another false climate agenda.." - November 2024
This is being done already ! Look up people !!!
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching!
Cooling the earth???? This is insane!!! We are cooking alive, this is not the earth i knew as a kid. These people should be in jail
Heat moves from high temperature to low temperature. Shades block the energy movement, which is the same for green house gases. Ask physicists why one cools the earth and the other warms the earth.
The avarage "Physisists" these days can't even tell the difference between infared radiaion(red light) and thermal radiation(heat)😏
Convection uses up heat in driving the ocean currents from the equators to the pole and back and evaporation/parcipitation yes up heat making the trade winds,weather,rain and cloud....heat is not trapped or Stored anyhere "Greenhousr Effect" was dipoven by John Tyndal's and Savante's experiments eventualy only finding water as the heat conduit (Hydrological cycle)
They like to thump on Tyndall and Savnte in I.P.C.C. but they dont expect the politiins or the aides to follow up on the zources I guess
Someone can correct me if I am missing something, but I think the explanation is that each type of molecule is able to absorb/emit light only when the light has certain specific wavelengths (this has to do with quantum physics). And the light that enters the earth from the sun does not have the same wavelengths as the radiation that is emitted back into space. So the overall effect of putting molecules of a particular type into the atmosphere can be either that the earth is cooled or that it is heated.
Remember when all the Covid-19 lockdowns were going on and people couldn’t go much of anywhere Earth was starting to get cleaner. I remember hearing about a lot less smog in these big cities and some rivers in Europe were getting cleaner also. Since world went back to what it was before now we’re seeing devastating consequences now.
The fact they are discussing this shows the severity of the situation
They are already doing it… look up.
Considering how dangerous climate change and all the tipping points are for humanity no its not too risky at all in fact its about our only hope
If Harvard proposed doing their first major experiment over the USA, others might be a tad more persuaded to listen.
Climate has always been changing.....
I love how they act like they’re not already spraying stuff in the skies. What if it’s backfiring and making it hotter??
This is already happening. Wake up
Would have been nice if you had covered space based mirrors too. Very interesting technology that could power the space Industrie and a moon base. It also doesn’t have as many drawbacks as sulfur based approaches.
Yes, at least someone here isn't completely uneducated. Way easier to deorbit a satellite then removing particles from the atmosphere. We should really learn from past mistakes like cfc's
I guess the mirror lobby guys aren't so fast. Or the chemical crooks spent it more money.
@@atlanciaza Thanks to bring up the cfc example. Dudes act like "wow we can't pull the thing out atmosphere in a couple years" and they basically don't understand how chemicals interact with EVERYTHING I suppose... They think the sea and rain won't be affected by it.
🛰A space based solution is clearly superior.
🧩 A space based solution is clearly more complicated.
💰 A space based solution is clearly more expensive.
@@BS-vx8dg Depends, on each of the three statements.
It may be superior, but cloud brightening as an example might work better. Hard to say without research.
Space may be more complicated. Or it may just be a massive very very thin inflatable sun shield that then just floats around in orbit. The pressure needed to inflate it would be almost nothing.
Space may be more expensive - or something like Starship may dramatically reduce the price to orbit and suddenly make it very economic.
The answer is we don't know, can't know, and don't need to know. The right answer to technological progress is to research everything, because you don't know what works until you try. Picking winners has pretty much always failed. I'm always on the side of people who say "let's research some more" rather than the side of the people who say "don't research that, it's a dead end." How can they know? Progress comes from trying things.
It’s already in practice look up at all the con trails
Aren't we supposed to wait until war against AI before we initiate operation dark storm?
..📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching!
LOL
I listened to this. I got solar engineering would change the weather patterns.
Just no, absolutely no, no more particles in our atmosphere. There is way better options.
Name them
@@kylenolan2710 pv as photovoltaic? Parabolic CSP coupled with steam turbine?
COWARDDDD
Stop using vehicles then
@@themechanictangerine stop cooking food then
It seems to me that mother nature is doing a cooling right now with so many volcanoes blowing Ash into the atmosphere my fear is extra amount of matter in the atmosphere will throw it into a deep freeze instead of just a cooling down
o ok I get it.. they're doing it now so they can research it later..
In case you haven t looked up at the sky lately, they have been doing Stratospheric Aerosol Injections and Solar Radiation Management since WW2, for 75 years already. Its not a proposal. Lyndon Johnson stated "He who controls the weather controls the world". How is that working out so far? After 75 years has geoengineering made your life better or worse???
Ummm... Hey people of Sweden have you not looked up in the skies? Geoengineering has been going on for years, decades
Remember back in the 70s when scientists were warning us all that the Earth was cooling too much?
In the 80's it was "Hole in the Ozone layer" ...
They change the narrative every so many years
What about painting roofs white, and creating more reflective surfaces everywhere?
If we all put on refletive tinfoil sombreros could also help
@@ristorantanen5769 Comically, you are right.
They have been spraying without our consent.
Just need to do 5 things.
1 Grow more trees.
2 convert deserts into greens.
3 use of public transport.
4 No weapons test.
5 less use of ✈️️
Solutions that won’t work for a problem that doesn’t exist. Very fitting.
So let's spray some of those chemicals in the sky with big airplanes and see what happens. Maybe we can even have a cool nickname for it.
Maybe because it might end up looking like a condensation trail (contrail), as shown at 1:58, but is chemicals, we could call it a chemical trail (chemtrail). That would be a clever play on words.
They're already doing this.
Cobra effect. Dont forget that everytime you create solution you create another problem or worsen existing one.
📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀......
Thanks for watching
Why not help the climate in the uk because we are getting way too much rain?
It's treated here as if the main question isn't, Will solar dimming help save us from excessive warming?, but, What will be the inequities involved (usually without comparing them to the inequities involved in the absence of doing it)? That is morally bankrupt. Other leaps in logic abound in this short video, too, but that one is enough to show how badly the producers' moral compass is skewed.
📩☝ Let's talk!..🚀..
Thanks for watching
I did not get that at all. Perhaps you should watch it again.
@@kylenolan2710 I totally did. All the comparisons were implicitly to a fictional world where we're magically combating global warming. If you assume that we're failing to (we are), then instead of saying "there's a risk that if you ever stopped geo-engineering you'd go off a cliff" you'd say "there's a risk that if we don't start geo-engineering, we'll go off a cliff".
@@kylenolan2710 Dense MC moment
theyve been doing chem trails like this for YEARS
so let me get this straight it can actually but people are getting in the way ...as usually. i think people dont understand its not suppose to be a solution but buy more time to achieve the target goals. Especially if it helps lower GDP countries the most
"Especially if it helps lower GDP countries the most" This is the main purpose, to lower America's GDP so that we can not compete with china.
idk, sulphur breaks up ozone molecules. the people in the rich countries can use suncreams, the poor who are working outside, don't have the money for that.
@@tomo11685 75000 years ago a rather small super volcano erupted wiping out 75% of all live, including all but 1000 females that created the human race. This was due to the sulfur that the volcano spewed into the atmosphere. Because it was so small, the nuclear winter only lasted 2 years. Glaciers formed and it took nearly a century to recover, but it did. Putting sulfur in the atmosphere would lower the planet but it would not last. You would have to do so continually and hope no volcano erupted after you put the sulfur there artificially.
I think that's partially true, but "it can actually" glosses over the real concerns about potential side effects, only some of which are known. That's what the bearded guy is talking about with "termination shock". Earth's ecology is interconnected in ways that are very hard to predict, and Climate Change is caused by humans messing with the atmosphere, so there's no guarantee messing with it in a different way will cancel out and not just create a new problem instead.
Analogy Time: You have a fever, and I know hypothermia lowers people's body temperature, so I put an icepack on your head. This helps a little with no obvious downsides, but the fever doesn't break, so I go all in and toss you into a snowdrift. This does lower your temp and alleviate some symptoms, but it doesn't cure the infection causing the fever, and while I'm keeping an eye out for signs of hypothermia, because I've never done this before I don't know about frost bite nor how to treat it, so you end up loosing a foot. It'd be better to have given you an icepack and then stuck to addressing the infection directly by gathering enough antibiotics to slow and eventually reduce it.
It's hard to know from just small scale tests and cloud brightening (the icepacks) whether worldwide solar-geo-engineering would be a larger icepack or a full-body snowdrift. I think it's worth looking into, and research may show us the worst side effects and how to mitigate them, but it also might not, and there's real risk there. It's easier to talk about what we do know than what we don't, but there's a lot more of the latter, and the environment is far more complicated and interconnected than we can hope to understand (look up "Yellowstone wolves" if you want an example).
@@samuelmelcher "Climate Change is caused by humans messing with the atmosphere" The truth is, we do not know if and how much we have contributed to the climate change. We do know that a lot of it is natural (despite the mmcc religion saying otherwise). IF we start assuming it is all man made and we do thing that will lower the temperature without knowing what we are doing, it is a guarantee of disaster. Scientist say that there is no evidence of a future disaster due to co2 increases.
So they want to release these chemicals with planes in a matter that would cause chemtrails? They act like they are just now wanting to do it and haven't already done it for years.
Talking about stocks, Forex trading/ investment is the most profitable venture I ever invested in, I reached my goalof $120k monthly trade earnings. wondering if viewers here are familiar with Lucy's trading platform
I keep wondering how people earn money in financial markets, i tried trading on my own made a huge loss and now l'm scared of investing more.
@@rosewin7560 I totally agree with you it has been an eye-opening experience for a lot of people..
Amazing,I thought I'm the only one she has helped walk through the fears and falls of stock trading.
Extraordinary is the right word for expert Mrs Lucy, she's experience as a trader and so unique..
@Dov zigler You don't need to be surprised because I'm also a huge beneficiary of expert Mrs Lucy trading service, I'm winning consistently trading with with her
there's a super bright white paint that if everybody painted their house roofs with it their houses would stay cooler and it would reflect the heat back into the atmosphere. ❤️
Yes, I can see why the Sami would not want research into how Morocco could geo-engineer their local (and incidentally global) mean temperature for a few million dollars a year. Aside, I have worked on coal mines and I believe mining and burning coal is evil. Also aside, as a Chemical Engineer, lowering global mean temperature is far easier than raising it. At some point we're going to have to put our big person pants on and stop patronising, despite how effective the 'argument from authority' has been to date.
I encourage you to watch the documentary "The Dimming" on youtube. It exposes the global climate engineering operations in their entirety and the consequences they are having on the web of life.
How they kept straight faces is impressive.
Hows this for climate change GROW MORE TREES AND STOP DESTROYING FORESTS.
This is worst thing we can do the earth, ,
The woman from the Saami counsel is entitled to object to having the experiment take place over her people's land, and there could be negative side effects from attempting to influence the Earth's climate. But I hard disagree with what she said about geoengineering being a substitute for climate action. We won't hit our Paris target (for 2030 there is zero chance, maybe better for 2050) so we should definitely be pursuing an emergency plan B.
I fully agree, Spacetweek!
The problem is that there is talk, talk, talk but very little action undertaken. The last idea, the one with the sea spray over the Great Barrier Reef sounds more applicable than the others.
What she meant is that if geoengineering became a thing then industries and politicians who are making dollars from the non-renewables industry would push for it to further pollute the earth. Sure, the emissions won't raise the temperature of the earth, but the air quality will plummet because corporations have a safety net and that is geo engineering. That's the biggest worry. Companies and politicians always find a way to use things that save lives into something that fuels their wallet.
give a gold medal to the narrator