America’s $25 Billion River Makeover: Turning Concrete To Parks!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 104

  • @marryellenmonahan5585
    @marryellenmonahan5585 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Can't wait for the industrial section of the marina in back Long Beach to be reimagined. So much potential

  • @gabrielpeck7718
    @gabrielpeck7718 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    this is a super idea sould be a win for native wildlife. also it would filter all that water naturally before it returns to the ocean

    • @SloppypapiBeefboi
      @SloppypapiBeefboi ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely would help. But that water will always be toxic lmao. Any time it rains the filth of la washes somewhere

    • @Rexluna1
      @Rexluna1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SloppypapiBeefboi wetlands reduce this pollution by sequestering it and sometimes chemically processing it. You can literally treat sewage by running it through a wetland.

  • @pacificostudios
    @pacificostudios ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I look at the Los Angeles River often when taking trains into Union Station. I already see ducks and other waterfowl in the river when before it was lifeless. The upstream work is necessary to slow water volume in the lower part of the River. I am glad that Los Angeles is finally appreciating the river that created the city.

  • @covid19deltaextrarewardspr88
    @covid19deltaextrarewardspr88 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I been in Los Angeles over 40 years and I love it.

  • @TheOak12345
    @TheOak12345 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    $50 million for 800 apartments? That sounds outrageous

    • @E11or
      @E11or ปีที่แล้ว +8

      62k per unit is pretty good

    • @okamijubei
      @okamijubei ปีที่แล้ว +2

      $50 million for 800 Apartments? That's like... let me see... if I divide by apartments to dollars then that would make it... let me see... when that's there and there that'll be.... $62.5K for each apartment.

    • @marcpapas5866
      @marcpapas5866 ปีที่แล้ว

      50 million to go towards purchasing the land. I don’t believe they said anything about how much construction would cost.

    • @Yaelynn_Lavender
      @Yaelynn_Lavender ปีที่แล้ว

      Good idea!

  • @DarvakSondrath
    @DarvakSondrath ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There are four major issues that have to be considered when reinventing the river:
    1. Flood management
    2. Green space for wildlife/ecosystem conservation and public parks
    3. Low income neighborhoods along side the river
    4. Critical infrastructure along side the river.
    If we want to accomplish objective 2, that threatens objective 1, unless we widen the river, which threatens 3 and 4, as widening the river would require us to displace communities and move (if possible and finacially viable) critical infunsturcture.
    The various groups involved in this project have to recognize for this to work, no one group can get everything they want out of it. A compromise is required. Environmentalist and community advocates will have to work together instead of against each other and be willing to make trade offs.
    1. Not all the cement can be removed
    2. The river's width could be expanded in some but not all places
    3. Some comunities and/or infustructure may need to be displaced. (Idealistically, quality replacement housing could be built before moving people away from the river)

    • @estelaangeles2346
      @estelaangeles2346 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rent will be low if someone creates their own ecosystem

  • @imanabdullah3263
    @imanabdullah3263 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Loving the project..

  • @RLReagan
    @RLReagan ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I’d really love to see this before I die. I won’t hold my breath tho. I’m getting up there. I wonder if there’s a way to contribute? LA saved me from a small mundane life into one where I’ve really thrived. I’d like to give back now.

    • @miles5600
      @miles5600 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Go to your local city hall meetings to support sustainable transit like biking, electric trains, busses and more infrastructure for all of the above. Housing also needs to be addressed by eliminating the minimum parking requirements, minimum lot and drastically changing the zoning map to allow for dwelling units, denser housing and apartments which increase tax revenue and allow for better services. You got it.

    • @blazesardonyx7557
      @blazesardonyx7557 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@miles5600 What Miles said!

    • @julianperez4049
      @julianperez4049 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you do for a living

    • @RLReagan
      @RLReagan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@miles5600 thank you for the information. I live in the Palisades but I’d often see the river working g at the Burbank studios and Nestlé in Glendale

    • @RLReagan
      @RLReagan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@julianperez4049 now I’m a trust attorney but before law school I worked at the movie studios and Nestlé in computer graphics for labeling and movie posters. Not glamorous, just cut and paste film stills.

  • @mrxman581
    @mrxman581 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hopefully, they can get a significant section done by the 2028 Olympics. I completely support this project. It's long overdue.

  • @fty-ys4ni
    @fty-ys4ni ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is this an automated voice? I hate channels that use them

  • @montymo
    @montymo ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Am loving your channel and informative video there

  • @everettkincaid1214
    @everettkincaid1214 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Check out what the Army Corps of Engineers did with Brush Creek in Kansas City MO.

  • @escobar789oscar
    @escobar789oscar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great idea..

  • @avrinrose5457
    @avrinrose5457 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In my fictional world, this project already finished and successful

  • @cliffwoodbury5319
    @cliffwoodbury5319 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so ill wait till 2050 until i go to L.A. so i can see the city as i want to see it. With the river complete, because i think that will be one of if not my favorite part of the city. L.A. is going to be better than its ever been if the continue with metro rail building at the pace they are building their metro network; with the added skyscrapers the city is going in the right direction

  • @des1
    @des1 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    I like the idea. but how about building more affordable housing for the people? billion dollars can build thousand of houses that people can afford. just saying.

    • @gabrielpeck7718
      @gabrielpeck7718 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i agree with all the billions of dollars their should not be homeless

    • @StevenJacobs
      @StevenJacobs ปีที่แล้ว +21

      There's been a $7.2 billion dollar budget to address the homelessness problem in Los Angeles. How's that money being spent? Who knows.

    • @Iceyfire12
      @Iceyfire12 ปีที่แล้ว

      And where is this affordable housing going to be build it! LA would need to buy 1/3 of every city within LA County which would be massive amounts of reestates to then develop it for affordable housing and it will be just slightly bigger than a Hong Kong apartment lol! Not for family of 7-9 ppl which most minorities except Asians have!

    • @paco7992
      @paco7992 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@StevenJacobs I live in the burned out husks of the Midwest where houses outnumber people three to one. We still have homelessness issues. You can not build your way out of homelessness. The problem seems to be lack of culture coupled with rampant hard drug use. It would be better for Americans to learn who their neighbors are and how can we be of service to each other. Sterile modern architecture only reinforces the idea that we are moving in the wrong direction.

    • @StevenJacobs
      @StevenJacobs ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@paco7992 Tell California that. Everyone complains about not enough money being spent on homelessness or "affordable housing" and that's not it at all. We need to bring back mental institutions and deal with drugs, rather than making everything just "legal" or even just handing money to the poor. We need (back to work) programs.

  • @kwebs10
    @kwebs10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think they need to worry about flooding concerns coming back. It never rains here in LA.

    • @majorlycunningham5439
      @majorlycunningham5439 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It DOES rain, but only a couple times a year. Sometimes even flash floods can happen. But not often.

    • @wetsock6334
      @wetsock6334 ปีที่แล้ว

      I happened to be passing over the river last time it rained and it seemed about 50-75% full. When it rains it RAINS

  • @ivycantu5006
    @ivycantu5006 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We have so much land,,but everyone on top of eachother ,,so much cement,,where is the nature?? This is sad.😢

  • @qjtvaddict
    @qjtvaddict ปีที่แล้ว

    Well damn I am impressed

  • @rolfjacobson833
    @rolfjacobson833 ปีที่แล้ว

    great

  • @BrandonLee-ig1qg
    @BrandonLee-ig1qg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An improvement, but any changes to the planet Earth is unfortunate.

  • @Aikynbreusov
    @Aikynbreusov ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I already see homeless encampments popping up along the river habitat now

    • @daharos
      @daharos ปีที่แล้ว +3

      grow up

    • @bluelambda
      @bluelambda ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daharos he isnt wrong though...

    • @jrr6947
      @jrr6947 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@daharos You're viewing the world through a child's eyes if you don't think this will happen. The hobos already make use of camping out everywhere else, so why not a nice new park?

    • @mikeohawk95
      @mikeohawk95 ปีที่แล้ว

      And in respects I live in one of those encampments to this day and few areas to get Wi-Fi to watch content like this

    • @mikeohawk95
      @mikeohawk95 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’d also use the rivers for hydro energy collection and flying car freeways on or high above the rivers too

  • @Tony-ku5oq
    @Tony-ku5oq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whoa, I thought they were going to cover the whole river with solar panels...

    • @fty-ys4ni
      @fty-ys4ni ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No that’s the aqueduct

    • @Tony-ku5oq
      @Tony-ku5oq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fty-ys4ni ah. Now awesome!

  • @Smiley_101
    @Smiley_101 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t think is a bad idea and it’s a great investment going into the future . I think it’s time the US should focus on building projects to benefit the community instead of spending worthless money to other countries when our own country need to be focus on . Peoples will absolutely be upset if their tax money is not going to build road and things going on in their state but elsewhere . The US been known for our generosity all over the world but you know it’s time just to also help build our own country too and stayed out of other countries crap 💩 they don’t butt in with our , we don’t butt w them . Next

  • @andreibaracuda
    @andreibaracuda ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hahaha, 25-50 years completion timeline, this is hilarious!

    • @qjtvaddict
      @qjtvaddict ปีที่แล้ว

      Typical American incompetence

    • @miles5600
      @miles5600 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ikr?!? 😂 they should really put some beavers there to help with the regreening part

  • @eriwidianto8215
    @eriwidianto8215 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subhanallah lakhaulla wallakuattaillabillahillallliyyil adhzim Allohu Rosyid Allahu hulghony Allahu mugghny Allah Akbar walillahilhamd,

  • @lightninlarry8936
    @lightninlarry8936 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yea great idea, build a beautiful river park and let the homeless ruin it. This project is pointless if they don’t prevent the homeless from invading it.

  • @politicalchannel66
    @politicalchannel66 ปีที่แล้ว

    🔥

  • @hafizsirajkumar7927
    @hafizsirajkumar7927 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can building affordable apartment?

    • @travelingnk6001
      @travelingnk6001 ปีที่แล้ว

      No ?? Why earth deserve every living things it’s not only for human

  • @Aikynbreusov
    @Aikynbreusov ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No affordable housing nearby the canal...... no low income families too.... they turn any beautiful place into a favela or little Africa

    • @daharos
      @daharos ปีที่แล้ว

      whatever racist. grow up.

    • @qjtvaddict
      @qjtvaddict ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok

    • @joshuakhaos4451
      @joshuakhaos4451 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep. "Affordable Housing" is the new term for what was known as section 8 housing for decades, And if they build "affordable housing", The places are never kept nice and the local area surrounding those places are affected. How do I know? I deliver construction material to these places and the workers there say that, Yes, affordable housing harms any nice community.
      And if one pulls their head out of their ass and acknowledges reality in America, You would know that the majority of Low income people dont give a fuck about their communities and dont care to integrate well with non low income individuals in whatever community they wind up arriving in. Some people who are low income really do try to get out of that situation and really take advantage to do so with low income housing and benefits to get move to a better socioeconomic position, But most dont and will never care too. And they just defile a good community wherever they are implanted. But no one wants to actually have that conversation because it makes you look hateful and non inclusive.

  • @remymccoy6078
    @remymccoy6078 หลายเดือนก่อน

    25BILL 😮, yikes 😬

  • @Aikynbreusov
    @Aikynbreusov ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, 25 to 50 years to just repair a canal???? That's outrageous..... China took less than that to go into space.... China only took 20 years to transform its cities into 1st class.... China took just 10 years to ramp up it's high speed railway system.... how we let China repair this canal in 5 years???? Just let the Chinese do it for cheap and fast.....

    • @daharos
      @daharos ปีที่แล้ว

      China is a crap country just like you're a pathetic troll.

    • @wetsock6334
      @wetsock6334 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They arent "repairing" the canal. They are making it less damaging to the people, something the CCP has a hard time doing.
      Why does it cost so much? We pay people better here and stuff costs more. Plus many middle-men involved in the process

  • @anthonyslaughter1419
    @anthonyslaughter1419 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You know that will be a nice place for the homeless to live and sleep since y’all can’t seem to care enough to build a homeless center / shelter to return them back to being self sustaining. So sad they don’t care

    • @benjammin369
      @benjammin369 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly what I was thinking when they showed the illustrations of the finished product, look at all that new tent land!

  • @SergeTaran
    @SergeTaran ปีที่แล้ว

    Happy clean low income communites on both banks of the river? Scam right there.

  • @andreinastase1604
    @andreinastase1604 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Taxpayers theft

  • @juannielsen7359
    @juannielsen7359 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    $25 billion dollars for the river and 25 years total waste of money and time a tiny percentage of people will use it with that amount we can fund section 8 to help thousands of homeless and mentally ill people repair potholes and sidewalks etc

  • @emp0rizzle
    @emp0rizzle 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just another place for the homeless. 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @akusitaaiai2215
    @akusitaaiai2215 ปีที่แล้ว

    All those artificial islands got washed away in several hours during heavy raining for 2 weeks. Waist of hard earned tax payers money.

  • @me2dance4u
    @me2dance4u ปีที่แล้ว

    Lies

  • @fcukrealmadrid
    @fcukrealmadrid ปีที่แล้ว +2

    total waste of tax money

    • @daharos
      @daharos ปีที่แล้ว

      you're a waste of human skin.

    • @fcukrealmadrid
      @fcukrealmadrid ปีที่แล้ว

      @@daharos thief calls for catching thieves