If you don't want to rememebnr the tedious and long PLL parity algorithms, you can easily avoid it. For that after you do all the centers, but last, you put your upper layer corners into their position and then look at your bottom layer. You need to permute the corners untill you have 1 at place and 3 out of place and only then you build the last center with switching center pieces from adjacent centers the way it matches up with adjacent centers AND you current corners orientation (or 180 rotation of it). Only after that you do egdes pairing and F2L. Thing is, all the algorithms for edges pairing and F2L don't change your bottom layer corners configuration and they remain at the same places, so when you get to OLL/PLL part, you are 100% PLL parity free. Obviously it also avoids the cases where your bottom center is rotated 90 degrees. It works, I assembled this probably more than 100 times already without using PLL parity alg even once.
Thank you for showing us how to solve this complex megamorphix. I watched your video again for a few more times, after failing to get the puzzle solved following the second or new algorithm. The trouble lies at the 2.46/2.47 m of the video; there is an extra flick, an R’ move after the r move. You have been using the lower case l and r to represent lL and rR, but here the R’ was not shown in the algorithm. I think my next attempts should work unless I fumble again as it is difficult to follow the algorithm exactly while solving it.
“There is actually no R' at all in the whole parity alg.” Yes, that is what I meant, there was no R' in the algorithm,but in the video at that point when after the r move was made, there is an R' flick.I think here what was needed was a "r" only move, but since the r was meant to be an r+R in the algorithm, a succeeding physical R' move was made to make up for that.The next time I get the same parity problem, I'll have another chance to verify this discrepancy. Thank you again all the same.
crazy bad cuber has a few tutorials on the mega and ultramorphix and he explains a way to avoid the corner parity entirely. idk if it would benefit you since you speedsolve but it seems to me like a very quick and easy step. he does although solve it with a basic beginner method so idk how exactly it would work with whichever method you use to solve centers on the morphix puzzles...
Devin Kerr I saw his video, but he has no solution to avoid it, if I remember correctly. I have a way to avoid it in my head, but the set up to check the parity is way longer and more complex than this algorithm ^^
Devin Kerr the first one is just a regular OLL parity alg, nearly every alternative alg should work, too. But yeah, the second one is a pain, but still much easier than my previous one.
Thank you I just solved my Megamorphix! I had PLL parity and kept trying the 4x4 axis cube PLL Alg
Glad that I could help ☺️
It took me a couple of days to create/discover this algorithm 😅
If you don't want to rememebnr the tedious and long PLL parity algorithms, you can easily avoid it. For that after you do all the centers, but last, you put your upper layer corners into their position and then look at your bottom layer. You need to permute the corners untill you have 1 at place and 3 out of place and only then you build the last center with switching center pieces from adjacent centers the way it matches up with adjacent centers AND you current corners orientation (or 180 rotation of it). Only after that you do egdes pairing and F2L. Thing is, all the algorithms for edges pairing and F2L don't change your bottom layer corners configuration and they remain at the same places, so when you get to OLL/PLL part, you are 100% PLL parity free. Obviously it also avoids the cases where your bottom center is rotated 90 degrees. It works, I assembled this probably more than 100 times already without using PLL parity alg even once.
if you have a video with the corner parities leave your link in my comment. Thanks!
I always thought the megamorphix is a megaminx but turns like a morphix
Cool!
come on, you haven't even watched 10 seconds xD
But all of your videos are cool so I comment before watching also I'm farther in now and it is cool
owooo thank you so much
Thank you for showing us how to solve this complex megamorphix.
I watched your video again for a few more times, after failing to get the puzzle solved following the second or new algorithm. The trouble lies at the 2.46/2.47 m of the video; there is an extra flick, an R’ move after the r move.
You have been using the lower case l and r to represent lL and rR, but here the R’ was not shown in the algorithm.
I think my next attempts should work unless I fumble again as it is difficult to follow the algorithm exactly while solving it.
Hi I watched the video again, but I couldn't find any problem at 2:46. There is actually no R' at all in the whole parity alg.
Thanks!
yo
Thank you
WOW Nice Video
Bro I came here for the center pairity! Which is what is shown in the thumbnail, but where is the center pairity?!
The PLL-parity algorithm solves the parity. And that you can solve the last player like a regular Mastermorphix.
“There is actually no R' at all in the whole parity alg.”
Yes, that is what I meant, there was no R' in the algorithm,but in the video at that point when after the r move was made, there is an R' flick.I think here what was needed was a "r" only move,
but since the r was meant to be an r+R in the algorithm, a succeeding physical R' move was made to make up for that.The next time I get the same parity problem, I'll have another chance to verify this discrepancy.
Thank you again all the same.
There is not an R' flick actually. You should look more closely.
crazy bad cuber has a few tutorials on the mega and ultramorphix and he explains a way to avoid the corner parity entirely. idk if it would benefit you since you speedsolve but it seems to me like a very quick and easy step. he does although solve it with a basic beginner method so idk how exactly it would work with whichever method you use to solve centers on the morphix puzzles...
Devin Kerr I saw his video, but he has no solution to avoid it, if I remember correctly. I have a way to avoid it in my head, but the set up to check the parity is way longer and more complex than this algorithm ^^
I believe we all wish his idea worked haha both algorithms are a pain to execute and memorize
Devin Kerr the first one is just a regular OLL parity alg, nearly every alternative alg should work, too. But yeah, the second one is a pain, but still much easier than my previous one.
1:34 Peel the stickers off lol it’s too small
Cool!