This is the Best Evidence that Humans Lived with Dinosaurs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
  • Check out Foreo at foreo.se/a7pa and get 30% off UFO 3. For the first 50 people, get a 10% additional discount using the code 10DECODE. Thank you FOREO for the sponsorship!
    Simon's Social Media:
    Twitter: / simonwhistler
    Instagram: / simonwhistler
    This video is #sponsored by FOREO.
    Love content? Check out Simon's other TH-cam Channels:
    SideProjects: / @sideprojects
    Casual Criminalist: / @thecasualcriminalist
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    XPLRD: / @simonstestchannel
    Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
    Places: / @places302
    Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq
    FOREO, UFO 3 deep hydration facial device, FOREO UFO 3 review, FOREO skincare, deep facial hydration, Korean skincare, UFO 3 how to use, UFO 3 review, facial mask, sheet mask, facial treatment, face mask, face treatment, Korean mask

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @decodingtheunknown2373
    @decodingtheunknown2373  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Check out Foreo at foreo.se/a7pa and get 30% off UFO 3. For the first 50 people, get a 10% additional discount using the code 10DECODE. Thank you FOREO for the sponsorship!

    • @gshaindrich
      @gshaindrich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      off course professional idiot Simon would in 2024 still not know, that BIRDS ARE DINOSAURS, he could have asked chat gpt, but chat gpt would have needed to tell him to ask in the first place...

    • @chickenwings6172
      @chickenwings6172 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually kid they did co exist, only indoctrinated or people apart of the illuminati say they did not. People like you cover the truth and or tell people they are delusional for believing the truth.

    • @JIMDEZWAV
      @JIMDEZWAV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This lying by omission is getting tiresome Simon , I luv ya but it's getting tiresome ...

    • @mrmagoo.3678
      @mrmagoo.3678 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@JIMDEZWAV Care to Elaborate?....Mate?...

    • @VineyardGHS
      @VineyardGHS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you account for the life expectancy increase you'll find it that it's actually they're about the same

  • @riktheyellowmonkey
    @riktheyellowmonkey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +387

    I was half expecting this to be 10 seconds long with Simon just saying "no they didn't."
    Then I remembered birds.

    • @NorthOntarian
      @NorthOntarian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      He did something like that for I think covid conspiracies. Was pandemic related anyways

    • @patriciakavanaugh5300
      @patriciakavanaugh5300 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Chickens!! Anyone who has raised chickens knows that there are dinos among us!

    • @justbrowsing6327
      @justbrowsing6327 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@patriciakavanaugh5300 absolutely, watching chickens hunt for food, or seeing what they do to a mouse when they catch one is scary.

    • @markkarasik2211
      @markkarasik2211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      😎I’ll take my dinosaurs fried with biscuits and gravy, thank you!

    • @riktheyellowmonkey
      @riktheyellowmonkey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@justbrowsing6327 There was a Smosh video the other day where a chicken on a long pole was described. They claimed it must be a ghost chicken since they can't fly. I could have sworn they can fly short distances. Everything I learn about chickens makes me respect them more.

  • @mattybob12310
    @mattybob12310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +297

    Here's a fun fact that still blows my mind every time I think about it; we are closer today in time to T-Rex than T-Rex was to Stegosaurus. We imagine Dinosaurs all roaming the same era together but their time scale is absolutely monstrous.

    • @ramseysaiymeh4905
      @ramseysaiymeh4905 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      What’s even crazier is life on earth was single celled for the VAST majority of the time there’s been life like %90

    • @gshaindrich
      @gshaindrich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      "We imagine Dinosaurs all roaming the same era together" - I don´t, and there are many others not so dumb... is it so hard to grasp the concept of timelines?

    • @mattybob12310
      @mattybob12310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      @@gshaindrich zzzzzz

    • @gshaindrich
      @gshaindrich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ramseysaiymeh4905 Why not think or research, instead of spewing BS pulled out of your a**? It is the other way round and if you would think for 2sec it would be very logical and obvious as well: unicellular organisms reproduced by splitting themselves after first doubling all their organelles and other cell contents. So what happens if the two cells don´t fully separate -> viola., there´s an organism with more than one cell!

    • @theblackgoatofthewoods
      @theblackgoatofthewoods 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In fact we are actually closer timelinewise to the T-Rex.
      When this dinosaur roamed on the earth, the Stegosaurus was long gone

  • @DungeonDragon18
    @DungeonDragon18 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +320

    The word "thagomizer" comes from a Far Side comic where a caveman is explaining that they named the tail spikes after the late Thag Simmons. Paleontologists realized they hadn't given that structure a formal name, so they decided to make that Far Side joke the official term.

    • @andiward7068
      @andiward7068 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Thanks for reminding me about Far Side! I could definitely use a revisit for some comic relief.

    • @DrScrobo
      @DrScrobo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      I remember that comic very distinctly. I really enjoyed it . We named a throwback hose at our company the Davidizer as it has flown back and hit David in the face three or four times in under a year

    • @patriciaaturner289
      @patriciaaturner289 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      All hail Thag Simmons!!!

    • @RaithGyaron
      @RaithGyaron 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I'm a dinosaur nerd and that's one of my favorite dinosaur facts.

    • @budgreenjeans
      @budgreenjeans 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      His name was Gary Lawson Rip

  • @GoatTheGoat
    @GoatTheGoat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +230

    I watched an independent documentary that clearly showed humans and dinosaurs together. It was called "Jurassic Park".

    • @Youre_sinful
      @Youre_sinful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for making me laugh today. lol I really needed it. Spot on!

    • @conorthompson943
      @conorthompson943 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Those weren't dinosaurs, they were genetically modified lizards

    • @wingerding
      @wingerding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@conorthompson943 no they were dinosaurs. It's not possible in real life though.

    • @conorthompson943
      @conorthompson943 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@wingerding no pal, listen up, they are intentionally genetically modified in ways dinosaurs from the Mesozoic period would NOT have been. They are living, but they are NOT true genetic matches for dinosaurs so don't go telling me they were dinosaurs.
      But yeah it's not possible in real life, would be cool though, right!?! :)

    • @victoriaeads6126
      @victoriaeads6126 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I saw that documentary when it was first released! Wild stuff! That poor, poor lawyer.
      ☺️

  • @the-chillian
    @the-chillian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    23:15 -- It was originally a reference to a Far Side cartoon from the 1980s. A caveman is giving a lecture to other cavemen about stegosaurus anatomy. He's pointing to the tail spikes and saying, "Now this end is called the Thagomizer... after the late Thag Simmons."
    The really funny part came after. It seems paleontologists had no name for this feature, so they happily adopted "thagomizer" and that is now its actual official name.

    • @katepoole6891
      @katepoole6891 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Great cartoons.

  • @pyingst
    @pyingst 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

    “You can’t just shove the facts into your idea machine and hope that it works. It doesn’t.”
    -Simon Whistler

    • @rebeccaritchie3315
      @rebeccaritchie3315 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Need this on a coffee mug.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      tbh the only difference between this and science is that conspiracy theorists shave bits off the facts to make them fit their ideas, science shaves bits off their ideas to fit the facts.

    • @annieinwonderland694
      @annieinwonderland694 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes as a fellow content creator i need this​@rebeccaritchie3315

    • @gshaindrich
      @gshaindrich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      “You can’t just shove the facts into your idea machine and hope that it works. It doesn’t.” - of course it works, if it doesn´t either there is something wrong with your brain, or the "facts" are wrong. You can´t blame the facts (if they are incomplete) that BS comes out, when you fill in the gaps with random imagined stuff.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gshaindrich “idea machine” here refers to the claim that the earth is only 6000 years old and humans therefore existed alongside dinos.

  • @the-chillian
    @the-chillian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    No, a rhino's horn is not compressed hair. It's made of keratin, the same material as hair -- but also nails, claws, and, yes, horn -- in a mineralized matrix. It's true that some of the keratin is structured in filaments or tubules, but those tubules are not hair.

    • @poiwytlee
      @poiwytlee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Halt, redditor! You're correct but "rhino horn is compressed hair" is an adequate way of communicating that to a layman who isn't really there to learn about the specific structure of rhino horn. It'll be okay!

    • @the-chillian
      @the-chillian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @poiwytlee I disagree. It's misleading at best. The best way to describe the material of a rhino's horn is to say it's made of... wait for it... horn. It's made of "compressed hair" in the same sense that the outer sheath of cattle horns with their lamina structure are made of "compressed fingernails".
      I'm not demanding that a writer go into the details of rhino horn structure every time the things are mentioned. That would be silly. It's better not to say anything about it at all, being both unnecessary and beside the point of the segment.
      Of course "it'll be okay". No one's lives depend on this information. But Simon already has enough strange ideas beneath his strangely attractive bald dome. He doesn't need them added to.
      Anyway, I'll have you know I'm a veteran of Usenet flame wars, and was a pedantic ass even before then. "Redditor" indeed.

    • @Sid-gu5qk
      @Sid-gu5qk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hairlip 😂

    • @SomebodysNephew
      @SomebodysNephew 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@the-chilliandon't be a painus in the anus. Regardless of the material one can assume they all get horny though

    • @eVill420
      @eVill420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@the-chillian it is better to describe a rhino's horn as "compressed hair" than leaving it unmentioned, as it could be confused with anatomical tusks

  • @radarlockeify
    @radarlockeify 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    I love the paintings of Adam and Eve, where they always have bellybuttons! 😅😅😅

    • @MeaCulpa04
      @MeaCulpa04 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who knows? Maybe they were created and hooked into an incubator by umbilical cord kinda like the matrix

    • @alprimeval4298
      @alprimeval4298 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      LOL good point I hadn't thought of

    • @gshaindrich
      @gshaindrich หลายเดือนก่อน

      well, that only means god has a bellybutton too...

    • @dannycolorado5875
      @dannycolorado5875 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnn.......

  • @anna9072
    @anna9072 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    One of my biggest gripes with a lot of the pre-history re-writers is their apparent conviction that humans in the past had absolutely no imagination. If they described or drew something then it MUST have been something they actually saw. When, in fact, imagination is probably the single most important factor in human cultural evolution. In order to design or improve a tool, the first thing that has to be done is to envisage something that does not yet exist. Imagination is crucial to our development. And yet some modern humans have so lost this facility that they cannot imagine prehistoric peoples having imagination.

    • @lawrencecrocker4870
      @lawrencecrocker4870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      this is what i was thinking while watching this...like maybe they had a van gogh kind of artist painting a picaso.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      also folktale descriptions of big creatures/giants must be true, ‘cuz there’s no possible reason early humans would exaggerate something to be larger than it really was!

    • @anna9072
      @anna9072 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @ Yes. How can you look at the LIBRARIES full of fantasy and imaginative fiction, and believe that human beings are not capable of imagining something vaguely in the form of a creature that a later human can imagine is a dinosaur?

    • @_bellatrix_potens_-bps-8366
      @_bellatrix_potens_-bps-8366 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@anna9072

    • @lawlaw295
      @lawlaw295 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you trying to tell me that the statue of liberty isn't proof that New Yorkers walked with giants?

  • @Lasvegasdayz
    @Lasvegasdayz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    Are there any archaeologists looking for cats and dogs with human faces from the Middle Ages? Because artists painted them so they definitely existed. 😂🤣

    • @IgorEngelen1974
      @IgorEngelen1974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      let's not forget the humans with animal heads from Egypt ;-)

    • @t84t748748t6
      @t84t748748t6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      furry's tru the ages

    • @greenockscatman
      @greenockscatman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      What about the giant snails and rabbits that constantly ambushed knights?

    • @allymichaelis8071
      @allymichaelis8071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is now my favorite comment ever 🤣

    • @Bubbaist
      @Bubbaist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Check out some of the paintings made by Europeans of the places Marco Polo described. The attempt at depicting elephants is pretty comical. Not to mention their depiction of Asian people.

  • @salahudeeniqbal3460
    @salahudeeniqbal3460 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +833

    The US president is 81 and one of the presidential candidates is 78. We don’t just live with dinosaurs, we’re led by them

    • @jscotthatcher380
      @jscotthatcher380 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      i'm getting up there in age and i have no idea how anyone over 50 can lead. like, where do they get the energy? drugs?

    • @UmmmmmmmWhat
      @UmmmmmmmWhat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Congress is basically nursing home.

    • @fattdamon1980
      @fattdamon1980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jscotthatcher380 Adderall for sure.

    • @airborneranger-ret
      @airborneranger-ret 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      lol

    • @TheHardys01
      @TheHardys01 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jscotthatcher380Adren°chr°me

  • @jessewilson8676
    @jessewilson8676 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    A name for the neurotoxin to extinguish, the dinosaurs could be marketed as “the meteor “

    • @usapatriot444
      @usapatriot444 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The only flaw for the asteroid impact idea being the demise of the dinosaurs is that it would not fossilize them.

  • @Im-Not-a-Dog
    @Im-Not-a-Dog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    Due to the existence of birds, this is one of those weird cases where the Conspiracists were technically correct, but not in the way they think they are.

    • @matheusfiorelli8829
      @matheusfiorelli8829 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      "Technically Correct, the best kind of correct" 😂😅

    • @lostbutfreesoul
      @lostbutfreesoul 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I do love Cassowaries.
      It is like they never forgot they where raptors at one point....

    • @theziggurat869
      @theziggurat869 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, birds are literally therapods, so I'm a little sad that it was never pointed out.

    • @eVill420
      @eVill420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@lostbutfreesoul oviraptors specifically

    • @Samantha-zu3qe
      @Samantha-zu3qe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@lostbutfreesoulneither have chickens

  • @benjamintowns9798
    @benjamintowns9798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Confirmed Anglican here. It's friggin crazy how long I believed I had one less rib. I have grown out of imaginary friends.

    • @RMCbreezy
      @RMCbreezy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I mean the rib thing is so as to have women be under our arm/embrace. To protect etc really. But to have an extra wouldve been badass

    • @nathancook7439
      @nathancook7439 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The human rib grows back genius

    • @RMCbreezy
      @RMCbreezy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@nathancook7439 found the lizard man

    • @ShadowDeus
      @ShadowDeus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What if it wasn't the whole rib but just fluid from it's morrow?

    • @RMCbreezy
      @RMCbreezy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ShadowDeus words used was tzela which means side, rib or side room

  • @imdanthompson
    @imdanthompson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    If humans and dinosaurs didn't live together then how did they get footage for the documentary Jurassic Park

    • @wingerding
      @wingerding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a fiction film.

    • @blackhat4206
      @blackhat4206 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@wingerding No way. Unbelievable.

    • @wingerding
      @wingerding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@blackhat4206 it's true

    • @OldLadyGladys
      @OldLadyGladys 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We used a Time Machine to get that footage

    • @dsxa918
      @dsxa918 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Life, uh... finds a way

  • @zrath67
    @zrath67 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    "Kinds" are distinctly not taxonomical. This term has not, and will never be defined. It means nothing, so it can mean what ever is needed for the current argument.

    • @littleblackcat2273
      @littleblackcat2273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I kind of like that explanation!

    • @baldbutton1983
      @baldbutton1983 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It means animals who are sexually compatible and able to produce viable offspring. If they are able to reproduce, they are of the same kind.
      It seems to be a pretty obvious explanation when you read the Bible

    • @baldbutton1983
      @baldbutton1983 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which, I might add, is exactly what we see in nature. Dogs don’t reproduce with cats, which means they’re different kinds of

    • @zrath67
      @zrath67 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What is a mule? if horses and donkeys are the same kind why would Noah disobey the lord and bring extra?

    • @baldbutton1983
      @baldbutton1983 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Horses and donkeys don’t fit the definition of the same kind. Remember they must be able to produce viable offspring. Mules are infertile and can’t reproduce because they’re not meant to be mating.

  • @Thrashifice
    @Thrashifice 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Three Horns don't play with Longnecks.

  • @theubiquitouspotato
    @theubiquitouspotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    I love the way we all assume absolutely every cave painting we find is significant and not just some cave man bored in a rain storm.

    • @TokerShark
      @TokerShark 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Either dicks weren’t funny yet or Cavemen must’ve been more mature than us, because I would have expected to find more dicks depicted on cave walls if it was due to boredom . 🤣

    • @caseco4979
      @caseco4979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They're both

    • @theubiquitouspotato
      @theubiquitouspotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @caseco4979 sorry I could of phrased that better. Of course they are significant to us. But not necessarily to them. We are trying to piece together what animal it is, and why they recorded it there etc. When in reality it was just some kids sketch book/the practice cave so they didn't mess up the main cave or even just the cave where Dave Caveman went to sleep of those funny mushrooms.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theubiquitouspotato Most of them didn't live in caves.

    • @theubiquitouspotato
      @theubiquitouspotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @randallbesch2424 yes I understand the nomadic lifestyle, I fail to see how it's germaine to my point though.

  • @Im-Not-a-Dog
    @Im-Not-a-Dog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    What I hate about some dino movies is when they make it seem like Pterosaurs would stand a chance against military aircraft.
    Sure, some Pterosaurs were huge, but they didnt fly at Mach 3 and fire rockets.

    • @eVill420
      @eVill420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      and they're just animals, even if you took a tyrannosaur a tank would flatten it easily

    • @Im-Not-a-Dog
      @Im-Not-a-Dog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @eVill420 Right. I dont care how big they are, they're still just made of meat and, when last I checked, depleted Uranium tank rounds blow right through meat.

    • @theubiquitouspotato
      @theubiquitouspotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Im-Not-a-Dog 1 round from a 30 mm canon and they are red mist. Depends on the missile if it will even lock to be honest, radar should reflect, but heat seekers aren't going to notice it.
      The only problem I can see is modern jets might be a bit to quick, and we will have to roll out the spitfires and mustangs, still absolutely going to win just maybe not with f22s the a10 is looking rather useful again though.

    • @Im-Not-a-Dog
      @Im-Not-a-Dog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @theubiquitouspotato I cant remember if Pterosaurs were myothermic like dinos, but if so they would produce heat above the ambient temperature(definitely while at altitude) so it would just be a matter of fine tuning the thermals to target that temp range. And anything with visual guidance systems would have no issue whatsoever.
      Tangent: I would love to see what a Sidewinder would do to a Pterosaur midair.

    • @theubiquitouspotato
      @theubiquitouspotato 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Im-Not-a-Dog the problem with irst systems is already range and that's when it's dealing with temperatures of in excess of 3000f bud. Doubt it's going to pick up a biological signature from outside of gunrange.
      They where warm blooded but even with a shockingly high metabolism it's not going to be hot enough to pick up much more than a mile away. Minimum engagement distance for even the shortest range missiles is 16km you aren't picking up a biological heat signature from 10 miles away not even if it's flapping like a humming bird. I'm sure in theory you could fine tune them but why bother? When the warthog exists? It's not like the pterosaurs can attack back, the only realistic danger to the aircraft is beaks in the intake.

  • @jarthursands
    @jarthursands 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +242

    I recently saw online that someone had referred to the bible as the Goat herders Guide to the galaxy. 😂😂😂

    • @karenshadle365
      @karenshadle365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂😂

    • @Davivd2
      @Davivd2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I'm a Christian, and that made me laugh. :-)

    • @amandaterrio4823
      @amandaterrio4823 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That’s great! Thank you

    • @RMCbreezy
      @RMCbreezy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I mean it isnt wrong

    • @bigginsd1
      @bigginsd1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Either that or the Big Book of Jewish Fairy Tales.

  • @MrYTGuy1
    @MrYTGuy1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    my first thought after reading the title was that we currently co exist with birds. the modern day surviving dinosaurs

    • @randysavage1
      @randysavage1 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Crocodiles

  • @kylienorton896
    @kylienorton896 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Ilze: How can I drive Simon mad? Why an entire hour of trying to pronounce Dinosaur names.

    • @lawrencecrocker4870
      @lawrencecrocker4870 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ya he butchered diplodocus. reason i remember that one in particular, is Ducky was one, from land before time XD

    • @heatherkuhn6559
      @heatherkuhn6559 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Honestly, "coelacanth" was the worst, and that's a fish, not a dinosaur. Okay, he has an excuse for that one. If he's never seen it before, the fact that it's not pronounced the way it's spelled is anything but obvious and it seems that his scriptwriter didn't include a pronunciation guide.

    • @DaleyKreations
      @DaleyKreations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@heatherkuhn6559But he's debunked lots of cryptid episodes and the coelacanth comes up all the time. It's every cryptozoologists favourite excuse for why cryptids should exist.

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@heatherkuhn6559 I learned about seal-o-can't 's through Pokemon when I was younger, they are chunky fishies, although they are sadly subject to really dumb creationists and conspiracy theorists given it's "living fossil" status (despite the fact that the Coelacanth's we have fossilized lived in fresh waters whilist the ones we happen to stumble into are marine species and have obviously evolved and aren't the exact damn same).

    • @scionofdorn9101
      @scionofdorn9101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simon’s already mad. Listening to him butcher language is meant to drive US mad.

  • @__T.O.G.
    @__T.O.G. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    3:33 no, while crocodiles aren't dinosaurs, birds are still technically theropods, and therefore dinosaurs, and further therefore, phylogenetic reptiles. Lest you want to exclude crocodilians from the reptile clade since all birds and all crocodilians are more closely related to each other than they are to any other reptiles, while also being distant from the other reptiles!
    Also, clades represent a groups actual genetic and evolutionary lineages, and can tell you more about what an animal is than physical appearance alone, which varies because of convergent evolution, which in my personal opinion, makes this classification objectively more accurate.
    And since those two are more closely related to each other than the rest, if you try to exclude birds you by default exclude crocodilians. Fun fact rant over now-.
    Fun fact two: 8:45 when referring to the movement if the behemoth'e 'tail' the word used to describe it swaying, or moving in the language it was written in hebrew could also be translated as "to extend" or "be stiff," and the word for tail, like in many languages like duestch(german) also refers to penises in ancient Hebrew.
    So there's a good chance the writers were not talking about a tail... Though, take this one with a grain of salt, I saw it in a video ages ago, and I dunno who it was so- yeah.
    Edit Three: there's a reason you have to crack bone to find "soft tissue" and that's because the "soft tissue" being found is extremely degraded tiny pieces that are likely preserved by a process requiring iron, and to be sheilded from the world inside of the bone.
    The name and exact details of this process are escaping my memory at the moment, but I'll edit this again if it comes back to me (Edit: I think it's called something like: "iron-mediated crosslinking"). It's (unfortunately T-T) not due to anything like dinosaurs living longer, just more processes of preservation being discovered, less interesting though Imo.

    • @RenoReborn
      @RenoReborn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Clint, is that you?

    • @Horvath_Gabor
      @Horvath_Gabor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      While I naturally agree with the phylogenic classification of birds as theropods, I feel that straight up calling them dinosaurs is causing more harm than good for the popular understanding of the "actual" (read: the extinct species that you see in movies and games) dinosaurs, because now every hack just plasters feathers on them and pretends they're just overgrown chickens, including sauropods and ceratopsians. I think it would've been less confusing if dinosaurs as a category was left for the non-avian species, and birds were given a separate branch for themselves, instead of everything getting lumped together, because right now, "dinosaur" carries as little information as calling a species "a therapsid". But maybe that's just a me-problem...

    • @__T.O.G.
      @__T.O.G. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Horvath_Gabor well, (speaking only in terms of clades) if you're trying to exclude birds you have to exclude the families more closely related to them from being called dinosaurs as well, which is weird and a little unnecessary imo.
      .
      Simple solution, there are avian dinosaurs, and non avian dinosaurs. That way, you get the separation of calling them "avian dinosaurs" but not removing them from the clade they reside in.
      .
      I *personally* don't think popular portrayal missing beats should effect how animals are actually accurately grouped together. But hey, I'm biased 😅 and I'm not anyone important to the discussion lol (⁠≧⁠▽⁠≦⁠)

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, crocs and birds are the last extant archosaurs - group which includes dinosaurs, pterosaurs, pseudosuchians, etc.
      I think that education for laypeople like me on this topic is getting better with the internet but it is definitely not good imo. Tons of misconceptions caused by pop culture like Jurassic Park and the like, it's quite frustrating really.

  • @sarab3888
    @sarab3888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Birds are taxonomically theropod dinosaurs, those are the only dinosaurs humans have actively lived with

  • @myvishan
    @myvishan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    The production team is really doing hard work in the last couple of weeks, so many vids came out. Thank you guys and thank you mr. allegedly

    • @HoundMonkey
      @HoundMonkey 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Um... his name is Factboy

    • @dannycolorado5875
      @dannycolorado5875 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Simon...simon...Simon😊

  • @tahlialysse
    @tahlialysse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    To be fair, the first jurrasic park movie and the books make it abundantly clear that any and all trouble with the dinos is due to bad human actors, greed, and willful negligence. At no point are the dinos a serious threat to people at large...they are just a threat to the individuals within the specific scenario, and it would likely be similar danger if a regular zoo specializing in lots of apex predators had similar "everything escapes at once" scenarios going on.
    This type of thread is lost more and more with additional JP movies, so it's easy to understand why Simon's conception of it is a bit off, and not to mention that most of Chrichten's works actually do feature existential threats to humans, so...

    • @zacharyball8009
      @zacharyball8009 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Chrichten books actually explained that the reason for the dinos aggressive behavior was because of the DX disease.

  • @ajdean2974
    @ajdean2974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    To quote the best Podcast on earth (RIP ONRAC...) "I didn't know that... and I still don't."

    • @DaleyKreations
      @DaleyKreations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was VERY sad to hear about the end of Oh No! Ross And Carrie. My husband even more so.

  • @Jpm463
    @Jpm463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    1:45 When a 500 year old clam was discovered and determined to be the oldest living animal. We killed it. Humans win!

    • @justinyates1154
      @justinyates1154 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Eh, we found it, THEN killed it, only to then find out it was the oldest after the fact. Kill first, ask questions later, right?

    • @Jpm463
      @Jpm463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @justinyates1154
      Yeah, kind of. We found it knew it was at least 400 years old. Then, we killed it to confirm the age. It was 500 years old.
      It was named "Ming".

    • @goosenotmaverick1156
      @goosenotmaverick1156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@Jpm463 the amount of disappointed in humans I was when I first read about Ming, was a lot.

    • @eVill420
      @eVill420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      just so you know scientists need to kill it to open up the insides, just last week I was studying clams in university and for the exercise I did in fact kill it too.
      if it wasn't killed we wouldn't know if it was the oldest clam recorded

    • @bradpaden3073
      @bradpaden3073 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Had no faith in humans already. But yeah we're trash. Will likely destroy the earth in search of knowledge. Shame well probably take all the other life on earth with us. Don't know that I believe it but the Bible says earth will end in fire. Doesn't sound all that unlikely these days. If it's not the fire it'll be plague that wipes us out. Dickin round with stuff that could end humanity. C. V.s changing our genes and causing number of supercancers to explode. Get checked out. Many folks being discovered to have stage 4 cancers without any warning

  • @djtigerstripes
    @djtigerstripes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    If dinos existed during the time of humans, there'd be literally millions of depictions of them all over the planet and they'd be featured very prominently in any artist's rendering.

    • @JoshuaLemons-i9r
      @JoshuaLemons-i9r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are and they did

    • @djtigerstripes
      @djtigerstripes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @JoshuaLemons-i9r nope. Gazelles yes. Birds yes. Elephants yes. Literally every conceivable animal was depicted in cave paintings for example. Zero cave paintings of dinosaurs. Zero depictions of dinosaurs found anywhere on the planet except for a few spoofs.

    • @MeaCulpa04
      @MeaCulpa04 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s what is being pointed out lol

  • @ClimateScepticSceptic-ub2rg
    @ClimateScepticSceptic-ub2rg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Oh, and dinosaurs are not mentioned in the bible. Behemoths are hippos, and Leviathans are whales. No dinosaurs.

    • @arondahlberg5086
      @arondahlberg5086 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah right... ever read the descriptions of those beasts? Tail like a ceder tree?😂 Seen a ceder or a hippo? If not dinosaurs then they are fictional beasts. The description of Behemoth though kind of fits a Brachiosaurus of some sort... it is also the biggest animal of all creation in the description. Just so happens to be that the description fits with the biggest animal we found in the fossilrecord to. If they are not dinosaurs they are fictional. Anything else would just be intellectual dishonesty😂

    • @Luubelaar
      @Luubelaar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arondahlberg5086 tail that MOVES like a cedar tree. Not the North American cedars, the ones in the Middle East. Ever seen a Lebanese cedar? Quite tall, but very flexible and they swish and sway in the wind. Rather like an elephant or hippo tail.
      Though I do agree that these creatures mentioned in the bible are likely fiction, just like the creatures in similar stories from neighbouring cultures in the time preceeding the Canaanites writing theirs.

    • @IAmAlgolei
      @IAmAlgolei 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arondahlberg5086 "Tail" is usually a euphemism for "the winky" in the Bible.

    • @ralphgreenwood2469
      @ralphgreenwood2469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How would you know?

    • @stevenswitzer5154
      @stevenswitzer5154 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arondahlberg5086right, fictional. Like talking serpents

  • @Snipe4261
    @Snipe4261 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    A singe attack helicopter would put a quick end to any Jurassic Park movie plot. Oh, and real velociraptors were the size of turkeys.

    • @A._is_for
      @A._is_for 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not during the storm though

    • @DeliveryMcGee
      @DeliveryMcGee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's actually how the first book ended.

    • @tektrixter
      @tektrixter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Velociraptors are turkey size, but there are related species in the size described in the books. Utahraptor is typically mentioned, but I think that one is too big.

    • @Beany2007FTW
      @Beany2007FTW 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@tektrixter They were originally deinonychus (Scaled up a bit, as they're about the size of a big dog in reality), reportedly Crichton was reading a book where the author decided that Velociraptor and deinonychus should be grouped as a species of velociraptor, not be actual different species, so he was aware of both.
      He decided that raptor sounded meaner - and in fairness, he ain't wrong.
      There's an actual wiki page called "Velociraptors in Jurassic Park" which covers a lot of the background.

    • @williammoran4898
      @williammoran4898 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Skeeters gonna argue that size don't matter. They'll eat you alive and you'll never see em.

  • @bipolarminddroppings
    @bipolarminddroppings หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Humans do live with dinosaurs. They're called Birds.

  • @JesseJoyce-cj2xg
    @JesseJoyce-cj2xg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I thought there was at least 20, 30 years between dinosaurs and people. My grandpa said he didn’t remember seeing any of them back in the 40s.

  • @oleksandrbyelyenko435
    @oleksandrbyelyenko435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Yes. And still do. They are called birds

    • @Real_Person_Not_A_Bot
      @Real_Person_Not_A_Bot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Touché

    • @SconnerStudios
      @SconnerStudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      The last bird died in the 1970s, they're all drones now #birdsarentreal

    • @oleksandrbyelyenko435
      @oleksandrbyelyenko435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SconnerStudios lmao

    • @Ms.Pronounced_Name
      @Ms.Pronounced_Name 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Real News. The fact Simon hasn't covered this truth is very suspicious IMO ​@SconnerStudios

    • @robertlogan5354
      @robertlogan5354 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      who called the birds?

  • @fuzzysteve
    @fuzzysteve 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thagomizers are called that, because of a Far Side cartoon. which named them because of a caveman called Thag Simmons.

  • @carlgibson285
    @carlgibson285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    The reason dinosaurs died out is because humans travelled back in time and hunted them to make dinosaur burgers. I read about it in the comic 2000AD so it must be true.

    • @L4g__
      @L4g__ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Honestly if we figured out time travel we probably would do that

    • @PositiveOnly-dm3rx
      @PositiveOnly-dm3rx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That was 24 years ago. Just like back to the future where they have flying cars in 2015

    • @carlgibson285
      @carlgibson285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@PositiveOnly-dm3rx the comic is called 2000AD but it actually came out in 1977.

    • @willmfrank
      @willmfrank 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Reminds me of the Ray Bradbury story "A Sound of Thunder."
      Come to think of it, that story would explain the last few years...

    • @carlgibson285
      @carlgibson285 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@willmfrank it wouldn't surprise me if that's where they got the idea. UK sci-fi comics were always entertaining but they weren't very original, at least they weren't in the 1970s.

  • @phantomninja904
    @phantomninja904 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    As a science lover, one of my favorite things is to always look at everything from the perspective of "what if we are wrong?" Like, what if the big bang never happened? What if God exists as a fourth dimensional being guiding our third dimensional universe(s)? What if the sun has far less fuel than we think it does? Pertinent to this conversation, "What if the foundations of carbon dating are wrong?" What if it drastically decelerated at as we get closer to the modern day and wasn't always a constant, leading fossil records to be wrong? No fact of science is above scrutiny even if it is accepted as a universal truth because every once in a while, "facts" can be wrong.
    To simplify, I like to keep an open mind even to the most ridiculous of theories.

    • @The_Reality_Filter
      @The_Reality_Filter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For all we really know the big bang never happened, it's still supposition at this point.

    • @karenshadle365
      @karenshadle365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @phantomninja904
      I have a warped sense of humor and I enjoy imagining ridiculous things. - Smirk...

    • @carastone3473
      @carastone3473 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So you’re gullible. Got it. 😉

    • @bcccfweirdo
      @bcccfweirdo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That is awesome, the purpose of science is to understand the world better and every day new discoveries are made by doing what you do!

    • @theeniwetoksymphonyorchest7580
      @theeniwetoksymphonyorchest7580 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s fine but be careful your brain doesn’t fall out.

  • @tripolarmdisorder7696
    @tripolarmdisorder7696 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The behemoth has a nose "that can trip snares..."
    A large mouth, and massive bones, but that nose is indicative of and exclusive to one animal.
    The African Elephant.

  • @BaronVonQuiply
    @BaronVonQuiply 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This can't really take an hour
    Evidence of "Dinosaur" dinosaurs living with humans:
    Evidence of actual dinosaurs living with humans: birds

    • @WeChallenge
      @WeChallenge 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't forget alligators and crocodiles as well.

    • @himonearth4328
      @himonearth4328 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@WeChallengethose may be Arkosaur

    • @himonearth4328
      @himonearth4328 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@WeChallenge both crocodiles and dinosaurs are archosaurs, crocodiles are not dinosaurs

    • @ZachBurns-gu9zk
      @ZachBurns-gu9zk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Crocodiles and alligators predate TREES. Yea they are dinosaurs. They come from a period before pre history. Yes mankind DOES live alongside dinosaurs.

    • @joluoto
      @joluoto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@WeChallenge They are not dinosaurs, they are archosaurs (which the dinos also are), so they are the cousins of the dinos.

  • @Demented_Chaos
    @Demented_Chaos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    omg, Simon has a better understanding of the Bible than half the western churches: some stories are non-literal stories primarily recorded to teach lessons of morality to the people in a digestible form. The Bible was most often spoken, not read when these stories were woven into culture and that context is massively important to interpreting it. Sure, some of the contents of the early stories could have taken from real events that happened before each story was put to writing, but chances are that the historical aspects were passed on orally for many decades and likely generations before they were finally written and disseminated among the population, most of which could not read anyway thus leaving the task of maintaining the word to nobles, religious figures and preachers that have been educated to read.
    Also, really valuable and neglected context for interpretation of the bible: it was written for an eastern audience. Storytelling and teaching in traditional eastern culture is very different than in the modern western ways. Ever hear of the chiasmus literary device? They're ***everywhere*** in scripture and it's pretty good indication that not all details of the Bible are to be taken so literally by smol brains that can't be bothered to think deeper than the depth of a page.

  • @ExperimentIV
    @ExperimentIV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    i had a budgie. was fun to live with a dinosaur descendant, but he passed away in june of this year at age 12.

    • @molybdomancer195
      @molybdomancer195 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Birds are dinosaurs - you cannot evolve out of a clade.

    • @ExperimentIV
      @ExperimentIV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @ well then i loved my pet dinosaur and miss him very much

    • @mitchellwarren5998
      @mitchellwarren5998 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sorry about your budgie, man.

    • @ExperimentIV
      @ExperimentIV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ it’s okay. he led a good, long, happy life.

    • @kirkalmeida
      @kirkalmeida 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@molybdomancer195 tell me you're a fan of Clint's Reptiles without telling me your a fan of Clint's Reptiles.

  • @Yakub9000
    @Yakub9000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Simon doesn't even know the 90s Jurassic Park exists 😂😂😂 ❤

  • @DFSJR1203
    @DFSJR1203 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The 1981 movie "CAVEMAN" starring Ringo Starr proves people lived with dinosaurs. LOL

    • @eshim3961
      @eshim3961 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There have been many documentaries about that nice Flintstones family, too.

  • @mzjalic324
    @mzjalic324 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’m really surprised it wasn’t mentioned that we literally do live with real living dinosaurs even today in the form of birds! They first evolved all the way back in the Mesozoic and survived all the way to now.
    Also props to Simon for trying on all those hard pronunciations, they were honestly pretty decent

  • @TheUnspeakableh
    @TheUnspeakableh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Birds are dinosaurs, so we do currently live with dinosaurs.

  • @Zelmel
    @Zelmel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Gonna be that pedantic guy solely because young earth weirdos are involved: they don't have a theory. It's a hypothesis, and an especially ludicrous and unsupported one. Since this whole idea revolves around science, I'd argue the common non-science definition of the worth "theory" doesn't apply.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      my favorite response to YEC dorks: great hypothesis. now get evidence, get published, then get back to me.

  • @Level3Lifestyle
    @Level3Lifestyle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Some caveman was out there living his best heavy metal record cover-art lifestyle riding a dinosaur through the jungles, hunting giant wolves

    • @Mutilatrix
      @Mutilatrix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genndy Tartakovsky's Primal

  • @Pit.Gutzmann
    @Pit.Gutzmann 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We still live together with dinosaurs. They are currently called "birds".

  • @robertstuart480
    @robertstuart480 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "They breathe Fire. How does that work?"
    Well, Bombardier Beetles exist.

    • @bradpaden3073
      @bradpaden3073 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep, fires not that far a stretch imo.

    • @stevenswitzer5154
      @stevenswitzer5154 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

  • @DaleyKreations
    @DaleyKreations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hearing Simon stumble over the dino names is both hilarious and puts my teeth on edge.
    Did you not have a dino loving phase as a kid Simon? I'm in my 40's and I still remember how to pronounce them all, even though I think I changed my mind about becoming a paleontologist around the age of 10.

  • @michelleno6078
    @michelleno6078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Per Dr. Clint Laidlaw, you can't evolve out of a clade. Birds descended from the maniraptora order of dinosaurs. Therefore birds are dinosaurs. Therefore I have a pet dinosaur. And even though he's only a budgie, he knows very well he's a dinosaur.

    • @rmonogue
      @rmonogue 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whereas my stinkin’ rad blue tongue skink only thinks she is a dinosaur, but lizards were never dinosaurs. 😂

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup, I have 2 lil dinos in my home and they fit the bill!

  • @garyseabolt
    @garyseabolt หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One of the silliest videos Simon has done. Birds and Crocodilians are both dinosaurs so we literally live with dinosaurs now. This is just arguing semantics which is completely pointless. By qualifying the definition of a word you can easily prove or disprove anything you want. Just like saying pterosaurs and plesiosaurs were not dinosaurs but we are going to count them as dinosaurs anyway. They are already qualifying the definition. Many people would say birds and crocs are 'technically' dinosaurs but that's not what we mean; of course it's not, you're qualifying your definitions to prove your point. We would benefit greatly if people stopped arguing pointless semantics and actually use that time in an attempt to understand reality as it is.

  • @jimschneider799
    @jimschneider799 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    @4:38 - fun fact, the original Hebrew in Genesis said that Eve was formed from the _side_ of Adam, not his rib. There is some speculation that its mistranslation in the King James version of the Bible was done deliberately to reinforce the subservience of women.

    • @stevenswitzer5154
      @stevenswitzer5154 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, because organized religion has ALWAYS been about control, not saving your soul. Meanwhile give unto Caesar

    • @miked8545
      @miked8545 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol

  • @Riff_Roll
    @Riff_Roll 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Birds are literally dinosaurs. Not the kind people tend to think of when you say dinosaur but they are the last surviving members of the theropod family line.

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, which is crazy to think about, they are absolutely dinosaurs, and have survived and are thriving with a lot of bio diversity.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Birds are Neorniths the one clade that survived the rest died out.

    • @randallbesch2424
      @randallbesch2424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ridleyroid9060 offshoots the alternate to mammals.

    • @SinnerChrono
      @SinnerChrono 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Im pretty sure chickens are distantly related to the T-Rex

    • @scionofdorn9101
      @scionofdorn9101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SinnerChronoBet Simon would go for some KFD (Kentucky Fried Dinosaur).

  • @Real_Person_Not_A_Bot
    @Real_Person_Not_A_Bot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Aside from birds, no. Screw you creationists.

  • @Vishanti
    @Vishanti 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Glad to see more channels debunking obvious hoaxes like the Ica stones and other young-earth creationist nonsense. Thank you, Ilze!

  • @A._is_for
    @A._is_for 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Thagomizer...
    Simon needs to do a biographics on Gary Larson

  • @mwolkove
    @mwolkove 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think the stupidest part of this whole thing is this: even if there are proven ancient depiction of actual dinosaurs, that doesn't mean humans coexisted with them any more than jurassic Park would prove we live with dinosaurs today. Ancient people, who regularly butchered animals, could've found fossils and done the same kind of reconstruction we do today, and then told the other people in the cave "based on those huge bones we found, i think that animal must've looked something like this. I didn't see any tracks around, but we should probably keep an eye out for them until we find out if they're aggressive or delicious." Or, it could just as easily be a completely imaginary animal that the artist made up a story about.
    The innate abilities of prehistoric humans weren't any different than people alive today, and bones would be of extreme interest to them, particularly if they had never seen the animal they came from. The same people who invented art probably also invented fiction around the same time, and it's hardly a leap to think they might've thought to combine the two ideas. I'm pretty sure that no one has actually seen Godzilla, so detailed illustrations of fictional creatures are clearly within the realm of human ability.

  • @Ian30rf
    @Ian30rf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    When I seen the Utah cave art I thought crane or another similar bird not Dino but now I want Dino nuggys lol

  • @Ahalaya
    @Ahalaya 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Unless you are in the camp that birds are drones, most scientists agree that birds are descendents of theropod dinosaurs (the group T. rex and Velocitaptors are part of). The main point of contention is if you actually count them as theropods themselves, or merely descendants. Generally speaking, biology rules state they are, in fact, dinosaurs, since you can't evolve out of that level of taxonomy.

  • @beagleissleeping5359
    @beagleissleeping5359 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Friend of mine doesn't believe dinosaurs were a real thing.
    Us: What about all the fossils, then?
    Them: I don't know but they're not bones.

    • @stephanybrown3226
      @stephanybrown3226 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I mean technically they are right, the bone got replaced with rock 😅

    • @jonyemm
      @jonyemm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They aren't though

    • @DaleyKreations
      @DaleyKreations 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was going through a museum once and the person I was with wanted to know why the dinosaur bones weren't bone coloured. And I just blinked at her (before explaining) because I'd known what a fossil was since I was like 5.

  • @1Samsonyte
    @1Samsonyte 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The real mystery in this video is that short sleeve sweater.

  • @Aannto
    @Aannto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Before watching this I hope you mention the vase and stegosaurus or longneck drawing on it and people where like "these people have no idea what dinosaurs are so that's evidence dinosaurs and humans lived together" 😂😂😂
    *edit* I was not disappointed 🤣🤣

  • @Gary-zq3pz
    @Gary-zq3pz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We do live with dinosaurs! You can get tasty dinosaurs at KFC and Popeye's.

  • @stephanybrown3226
    @stephanybrown3226 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Aw you mean the Dinotopia books aren't real? 😂

  • @gbubbles7383
    @gbubbles7383 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The argument that “there’s a drawing, so it must be real” has me wanting to see their faces when they see cartoons and comic books for the first time.

  • @shannonbreen3732
    @shannonbreen3732 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Birds are dinosaurs. Crocodiles are crocodiles and have not changed much since the days of the dinosaurs except to grow smaller.

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Crocodylomorphs maybe haven't underwent many significant changes (although they already presently have plenty of bio-diversity, more than you'd think, and we have lost land crocs), pseudosuchia as a whole used to be really darn diverse. There used to be big armored tanks called aetosaurs, there were herbivorous members as well. I would recommend the channel "CHimerasuchus", he covers a lot of pseudosuchians.

  • @RenoReborn
    @RenoReborn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I also have evidence that humans lived alongside Dinosaurs... they're called BIRDS 🤣

  • @HandyMan657
    @HandyMan657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Oh man, you're going to get the creationists all worked up. Velociraptor riding Jesus will get you.

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Given the size of velociraptors (chicken - turkey), it would make more sense for them to be riding Jesus than the other way around. Maybe jesus with a velociraptor on his shoulder.

    • @alprimeval4298
      @alprimeval4298 หลายเดือนก่อน

      rofl

  • @nbarnes6225
    @nbarnes6225 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Simon, the living embodiment of: "Man creates dinosaurs. Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth."

  • @markusspitznagel2011
    @markusspitznagel2011 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    "We would dominate the shit out of dinosaurs" aaaaaaand point of the movie missed completely xD

    • @MoonWomanStudios
      @MoonWomanStudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Explain the point to me please

    • @SkyeRequiem001
      @SkyeRequiem001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MoonWomanStudios They spared no expense -lot's of expenses were spared, corporate malfeasance caused a few deaths-

    • @markusspitznagel2011
      @markusspitznagel2011 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MoonWomanStudiosnot everything that can be done, should be done. The movie is about human Hybris... thinking we can control the world.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean, big huge animals with big huge caloric needs? way too easy for humans to topple. the real danger would be the tiny dinosaurs ‘n such that become pest species- speaking as a Florida man.

  • @panl22
    @panl22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    24:50 🤣🤣"Cambodians in the early 1300s were domesticating dinosaurs and slapped a muzzle on a stegasaurus...."🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"

  • @PH-jv4ik
    @PH-jv4ik 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Remember kids if it happend on TV it must've happend in real life.

    • @L4g__
      @L4g__ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And never forget that no-one ever lies on the internet

  • @cartilagehead
    @cartilagehead 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The best evidence we have for humans coexisting with dinosaurs is the chicken katsu I had for dinner last night

  • @jeremywhite5762
    @jeremywhite5762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Anyone ever watch the Ringo Starr movie Caveman it's fantastic man hilarious

    • @christiangrantz6906
      @christiangrantz6906 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Bobo... Bobo means friend!

    • @jeremywhite5762
      @jeremywhite5762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @christiangrantz6906 YES somebody knows what I'm talking about 👍 caveman is ranked up there with all the Monty Python stuff on my list

    • @NorthOntarian
      @NorthOntarian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Haha yes lmao

    • @DrunkcookingwilthBilly
      @DrunkcookingwilthBilly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I remember the diarrhea scene

  • @randallbesch2424
    @randallbesch2424 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jurassic Park was about fools bringing back extinct animals and not understanding them.
    A cautionary tale.

  • @weirdkitty07
    @weirdkitty07 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The earkier one about the carved rocks was also on that cheese fest History channel. It was convenient later 'more correct' dino rocks were found after the 1990s movie Jurassic Park. Ha.

  • @Zackaria_sMax
    @Zackaria_sMax หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    23:05 it was named after a farside comic in which a cave man points at the spikes on a dinos tail and says "The thagomizer, named after the late Thag Simmons". And scientists thought it was funny, so now they're called thagomizers
    R.I.P. Thag

  • @sarameyrick7182
    @sarameyrick7182 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Erm, colour me pedantic, but birds are actual dinosaurs 😮😊❤❤❤❤

  • @spddiesel
    @spddiesel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:03 tell me you've never had a brontosaurus burger without telling me you've never had a brontosaurus burger...

  • @macflod
    @macflod 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    1:45 Jurassic park books theme is a warning about the new technology of genetic modification and how chaos theory speaks of humans not being in control. There is a bunch of safe gaurds as you mention, dinos are dependent on medicine and are tracked but humans overlooked stuff and lost control

    • @robertlogan5354
      @robertlogan5354 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the movie (as good as it may be) lost sooo much in the translation from page to screen...

    • @macflod
      @macflod 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ yeah, i just finished reading it a few weeks ago.
      I found out some cool trivia- Do you know James Cameron was also trying to get rights to make it into a movie but Spielberg got it. Cameron said his would have been darker, more like the book. I can imagine it actually, after reading i can see an Aliens/terminator feel to that story. Id love to have seen that!
      However after the film was made Cameron said Spielberg was the correct choice the version made was a warmer one with wider appeal without loosing the story

  • @Booberly
    @Booberly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the theory of dragons in all cultures being "memories" of distant ancestors common predators. Snakes, big cats and eagles

    • @ridleyroid9060
      @ridleyroid9060 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Strange that the giant shortfaced bear hasn't shown up as a "dragon" in any indigenous american mythos to my understanding, that thing is absolutely terrifying.

  • @happybeejv
    @happybeejv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dinosaurs evolved into chickens
    We live with chickens
    Ergo humans live along side dinosaurs

  • @williamst.romain7393
    @williamst.romain7393 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You should see Aron Ra's videos on this topic.

  • @ashleybowles7732
    @ashleybowles7732 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A kangaroo is the upright rock wall art

  • @victorialovatt976
    @victorialovatt976 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Inevitably now have the “It’s Jurassic Park, it’s a massive park, what could possibly go wrong?” tune in my head….😂

  • @tommern84
    @tommern84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Well.. EXCEPT from ALL the birds that still are alive today.. since ALL birds are 100% dinosaurs

    • @DeliveryMcGee
      @DeliveryMcGee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's pretty much left unstated that "dinosaur" without qualifiers is meant as "non-avian." Phylogeny is one thing, colloquial speech is another, and you have to draw the line somewhere. By strict definitions, you're a weird fish.

    • @tommern84
      @tommern84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @DeliveryMcGee birds =dinosaurs per new definition

    • @tommern84
      @tommern84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Birds are the only known living dinosaurs. They're descended from the type of dinosaur known as the theropod. A branch of dinosaurs.. So 100% DINOSAURS.

    • @DeliveryMcGee
      @DeliveryMcGee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tommern84 Did you even read what I said? Because I had to go back and read it to make sure I said what I thought I said after seeing your reply. Which was "Yes, birds are dinosaurs, but when people say 'dinosaur' they almost always mean the not-bird ones."

  • @SmashBrosAssemble
    @SmashBrosAssemble 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Humans do live alongside us today, you see them every day in your life flying around roosting on roofs & trees.

  • @veridico84
    @veridico84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Elephant Birds went extint around 1000AD, they were 3m high, and huge. That is basically a dinosaur

  • @kasahadragon9499
    @kasahadragon9499 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There are those Christians that deny dinosaurs ever existed because they say weren't mentioned in the *real* bible. They do however believe unicorns once roamed the earth because they *are* mentioned in the real bible and no, they don't accept that a unicorn was actually what we'd call a rhino 😂

  • @ArsonFire00
    @ArsonFire00 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    0:17 The Bible doesn't say that humans lived with dinosaurs either. I think you're confusing it with The Flintstones.

    • @johnfoxsmith2077
      @johnfoxsmith2077 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      While it doesn't outright say humans lived with dinosaurs (because people of the past were unaware of the existence of Dinosaurs in the way we know of them today) it does paint the picture of the earth being very young. Around 6,000 to 10,000 years old. Which would imply that humans and dinosaurs had to have coexisted. Not to mention Genesis outright says everything in existence was made in a week.

    • @AmandaHunter777
      @AmandaHunter777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnfoxsmith2077unless you accept a previous creation, or one of several other theories all of which are biblically acceptable. 🤷‍♀️

    • @TheBlaqOrder
      @TheBlaqOrder 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes it does. Behemoth "bends it's tail like a cedar"?!

    • @Haliwa-Saponi
      @Haliwa-Saponi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The dinosaurs are land animals which were created on day 6

    • @johnparla6252
      @johnparla6252 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dragons are dinosaurs and almost every colcher tells us about them .

  • @Techstriker1
    @Techstriker1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reminds me of the meme showing and claiming Stephen Spielberg was a trophy hunter, showing him next to a "dead triceratops". 😆

  • @scottnunnemaker5209
    @scottnunnemaker5209 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One of the things that made me realize religion was dumb as a kid was the insistence that dinosaurs and humans lived together.

  • @TheWhiteTrashPanda
    @TheWhiteTrashPanda 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another important thing to keep in mind is that the majority of dinosaurs were not these gigantic creatures. Many would have been no bigger than a lion or other large cat and most would have been significantly smaller than that.
    The word "dinosaur" just means "terrible lizard".

  • @princesstaco6100
    @princesstaco6100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What is this? Lol never in my life

  • @geeknupthenight7417
    @geeknupthenight7417 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simon"humans and dinosaurs didn't live together"
    Me looks at my cockatiel

  • @taylorrenee4880
    @taylorrenee4880 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    “Lets rag on Christianity for 10 minutes, but give a pass when another religion is brought up”. Classic Simon and his minion writers.

  • @greenockscatman
    @greenockscatman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The human instinct to draw weird monsters.

  • @SconnerStudios
    @SconnerStudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    There are republicans who don't believe dinosaurs ever even existed. Remember to vote Tuesday!

    • @BTM666-t7r
      @BTM666-t7r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are democrats that think islands will flip over because of climate change, so yeah.

    • @I_TheLandlord
      @I_TheLandlord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Being republican has nothing to do with not believing in dinosaurs,but it’s probably more prevalent with them.

    • @JamieAlice92
      @JamieAlice92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@I_TheLandlord not all republicans are science-deniers. But all science-deniers are republicans.

    • @dplocksmith91
      @dplocksmith91 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@I_TheLandlord Christian Fundamentalists, specifically the Neo-Charismatics (the really batshit ones who think that they have divine powers because of their faith in Jesus) are Trump's biggest backers. The Republican Party has been taken over by an abberant Christian cult whose sole goal is to force everyone onto their knees for their God. They're basically the worst aspects of the Spanish Inquisition and the Crusaders and Conquistadors mixed with the worst aspects of the Westboro Baptist Church. This election is a contest between democracy and theocracy. If Trump wins, the Christian Fundamentalists will make paleontology illegal.

    • @RealSkoolmaster
      @RealSkoolmaster 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are democrats who actually believe their policies are good for the little people while lining the peasants kids up for war. Remember to vote Tuesday!