XB-70 Valkyrie's Last Flight: This Week In Aviation History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 91

  • @scottrubin4478
    @scottrubin4478 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    My grandfather worked on the XB-70, specifically on the honeycomb sections. He talks fondly about the project to this day and laments its end.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My dad did engineering work on the engines. He always had a fondness for this aircraft.

    • @aidenkahn4338
      @aidenkahn4338 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My grandpa grew up in Cali he was beat friends with Joe walkers son and he says he still remembers when the cops pulled him from school and told him what happened to his father. Really a sad story my grandpa was friends with his for a long time not sure if that fellow is still alive my grandfather is he turns 70 soon.

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My grandfather swept the hangar floors.

    • @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf
      @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well MY dad worked on bathroom tile, specifically glazed tile. He talks fondly on the tile projects he did and laments their end after five years. So pretty much the same thing.

  • @MissilemanIII
    @MissilemanIII 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I got the grand tour of the XB-70 when I was a kid. Never forgot it.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I'm planning to go to Wright-Patt and see it in person, that must have been quite an awesome experience you had!

    • @earthwindflier
      @earthwindflier 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@PilotPhotogWright Patt is av geek heaven. Or at least I HOPE it's heaven. Truly amazing.

    • @teddy.d174
      @teddy.d174 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PilotPhotog I haven’t been there since I was a kid, probably 11/12yrs old. I’ve been wanting to go back recently, let me know when you go and maybe I’ll meet you there.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@teddy.d174 will do Ted, that would be awesome!

  • @CrossWindsPat
    @CrossWindsPat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    My all time favorite human creation

  • @Kragatar
    @Kragatar หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When I visited the USAF museum, the Valkyrie was the main thing that stuck in my mind. It really is humongous and just has this otherworldly presence about it. Looks like something out of Star Wars.

  • @snowbirdlady7221
    @snowbirdlady7221 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My Dad was an electrical engineer at North American/Rockwell and worked on the cockpit lighting systems. We got to go to the roll out in Palmdale when I was 10. It was so impressive and huge. Quite the memory. Of all the planes and spacecraft he worked on, he was most proud of the XB-70.

    • @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf
      @ASDasdSDsadASD-nc7lf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well MY dad installed bathroom tile and I got to see the roll out of a few cases of tile on a two-wheeler. So pretty mush the same thing.

  • @wyattdean5192
    @wyattdean5192 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I live about an hour away from wright pat, so i’ve been blessed with seeing this behemoth in person

  • @tklube308
    @tklube308 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Going up to WPAFB next Friday. She is on of my favorite birds ever. She is a marvelous work of engineering.

  • @bigetnt
    @bigetnt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I saw this in person at the Ohio Dayton museum. You can't understand how big this aircraft is until you see it in person. Powered by 6 massive jet engines. The size of this aircraft is unbelievable. It's absolutely beautiful. Just to see this one aircraft is worth the trip.

  • @perrytheplatypus8802
    @perrytheplatypus8802 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I flew 1/2 way round the world to see it, I was not disappointed

  • @jxaparicio
    @jxaparicio 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In 1972 I took an after school aircraft drafting class at North American Rockwell and all of our training materials were declassified XB-70 documents. I wish I had kept those manuals.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Futuristic looking plane like something out of Thunderbirds 👍✈️

  • @Von_Len
    @Von_Len 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m fortunate enough to have a Rollout Ribbon and Pin given to me by XB-70 technician and friend many years ago. I’ve always lived just a few miles from the Palmdale facility they were built at, here in the Antelope Valley. I went to Joe Walker junior High School named in honor of Joe Walker. Great video, Thank You.

  • @JSFGuy
    @JSFGuy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Here we go.

  • @bc-guy852
    @bc-guy852 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This must have been a lot of work. VERY well done. I really enjoyed this.
    Thanks for your professionalism .

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you very much! The goal is to make 52 of these, one for each week of the year and sort of make a "binge" list. Cheers!

  • @douglascorley6630
    @douglascorley6630 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I enjoyed seeing it there it was awesome

  • @Garaculas
    @Garaculas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video to an incredible plane. Always loved the XB and remember playing it on flight simulators as a kid and thinking it was mega.
    Went to wright pat last week on a trip to the US from the UK. Had no idea the XB was there beforehand and was awe struck as I walked into the hanger to see her.
    Spectacular.

  • @amcds2867
    @amcds2867 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Very nice documentary. The top speed of the XB-70 Valkyrie, 3309 km/h is actually just over 8 football fields per second.

    • @teafool753
      @teafool753 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anything but normal measurements

  • @scottnj2503
    @scottnj2503 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Gotta appreciate an aircraft so powerful, a B-58 Hustler plays the role of Chase plane. That's Mach 3 for ya :). I wonder...did they ever fly an A-12 Archangel against the XB-70. That'd have been an interesting mission to plan and execute.

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How would they fly an A-12 Archangel against the XB-70?

  • @davidrivero7943
    @davidrivero7943 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Helicopter guy fixated on the beauty of this bird , since childhood.

  • @joaquimfonseca2047
    @joaquimfonseca2047 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    EXCELENTE CANAL...OBRIGADO...

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Gracias!

  • @prosto_potomuwto
    @prosto_potomuwto หลายเดือนก่อน

    A very underrated aircraft, and much better than sr-71. The instability created by the wing profile, is much higher, than by the fuselage not being in line with the engine.

  • @hunterhalo2
    @hunterhalo2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Awesome. Sounds odd to say, thanks for narrating this and not using AI. Infinity more enjoyable.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I spend a lot of time recording my audio - I really appreciate it when someone points that out. Cheers!

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed. Plus, he has an excellent narrative voice.

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronjon7942 thank you!

  • @Hurpdurpdipidydoo
    @Hurpdurpdipidydoo 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    2000 mph is mind blowing

  • @sunilmisra1
    @sunilmisra1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, first flew in 1964! Looks so modern

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still does look modern today indeed. Way ahead of its time. Thanks for commenting!

  • @jaybee9269
    @jaybee9269 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you imagine B-70s, B-1B penetration bombers and B-2s? A real interception problem.

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nope. The B-70 had no penetration potential, and we'd be reducing the number of other available aircraft if we had to pay for B-1, B-2 and the B-70.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@winternow2242 >> IDK. The Soviet Bloc went to an awful lot of trouble to try to intercept the SR-71.

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jaybee9269not really. The SR-71 flew only at the edges of Soviet airspace. There's a reason we developed low level flying manned aircraft and cruise missiles.

  • @mamarussellthepie3995
    @mamarussellthepie3995 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rip XB70 and Crew! 🫡

    • @JoeBiden1776
      @JoeBiden1776 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💝🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @scottrutter1381
    @scottrutter1381 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 6:10 the narrator says the B-70 could achieve a speed of 100 football fields per second. That’s 20,455 mph, almost Earth escape velocity! I think he meant to say 10 football fields which would be closer to 2035 mph.

  • @jeremykinball2765
    @jeremykinball2765 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    ....60 years separates the Wright Brothers and the XB-70....and 60 years separates the XB-70 and today. So just think what is actually flying today....

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      why think when you can read. Why would you think that we're hiding anything when the XB-70 was heavily publicized?

    • @rickylong1001
      @rickylong1001 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Think 20 years into the future and imagine, that's what is in the skies of today and beyond! SG-1?!

  • @rgl9649
    @rgl9649 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That plane is scary this was back in the 50's I can only imagine what they have now

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wasn't built until 1964. And you don't have to imagine what we have now, you can read it, just like you could have read about this plane in 1964.

    • @UniversalStandard
      @UniversalStandard 11 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      People like to self-propagandize about black projects, but really there aren't any anymore. You can't hide anything in the smartphone age of narcissists looking for clout. Especially with how many people it takes for such a project, and the types of lonely dweeb engineers that want to impress their cyber girlfriends. Not to mention, most of that "earmarked" money is only going into executive pockets. Think about Lockheed's Darkstar, they put into a fucking movie. Sure they can obscure performance figures by telling employees different things, but none of this stuff is hidden anymore, at least in the U.S. China and Russia might have an easier time keeping things concealed with the authoritarian control they have, but even then, doubtful.

  • @Cutecataikitten
    @Cutecataikitten 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What are the qualifications for glider tug pilot

  • @DrMackSplackem
    @DrMackSplackem 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a sample of the honeycomb sandwich from my grandfather's days at Rockwell. For some reason, there's a SPANDEX sticker on one side of it.

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The honeycomb is added to plus sized spandex pants for the ‘People of Walmart’ series, to keep them from exploding.

  • @Sc_carspotting17
    @Sc_carspotting17 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m not able to open your website when I type it into the internet. Is there a link to get to it?

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Here you go: pilotphotog.com/

    • @Sc_carspotting17
      @Sc_carspotting17 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PilotPhotog thanks!

  • @laron_t_green
    @laron_t_green 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The B1s Mother

  • @djpalindrome
    @djpalindrome 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fitz Fulton piloted the B-52 mother ship that dropped the X-15 hypersonic research aircraft at altitude

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And?

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An interesting design for sure. Wasn't the B-70 and SR-71 the reason why Russia built the MiG-25?

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not likely. The Soviets began working on the MiG-25 in 1961, before either the XB-70A or SR-71 or A-12 had flown. The B-70 was cancelled in early 1961, and never built. Virtually all of the Soviets' work on the MiG-25 came after that cancelation. The motive for tge MiG-25's speed is probably more prosaic than the internet claims, allowing the Soviets to defend a vast Frontier with a comparatively small number of aircraft.

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mmmm, from Wings of the Red Star, the MiG-25 was intended to intercept the XB-70. But given the dates posted by Winternow, maybe he’s correct. But what else would the Foxbat had been constructed so quickly for?
      At any rate, the Blackbird was probably a surprise for the Soviets. That project seems to have successfully been secret, with no leaks discovered to this day. But who knows for sure, right?

    • @Silver_Prussian
      @Silver_Prussian 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was believed that its main target would be the xb70 that why the soviets rushed the mig25 into production however the xb70 never materialised.

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Silver_PrussianThe MiG-25 was never rushed into production. Development began in early 1961, with a first flight in 1964, pretty much as long as it took for the F-14 go from RFP to 1dt flight, and longer than for the F-16. The Soviets took even longer to go from 1st flight to operational status. Recce Foxbats entered service in 1969, and teh inetrceptor model entered service around 1972, just 2 years before the F-14, even though its first fligth was 6 years earlier.
      "It was believed that its main target would be the xb70"
      I'd be very curious to know who believed that, since the XB-70 wasn't a bomber, or any combat aircraft, but a flight test aircraft with no weapons systems or the ability to carry them. The XB-70A actually did materialize in 1964, flying AFTER the 1st MiG-25, and being retired in 1969. However, it was obvious by early 1961 that the US never had any plans to putting a bomber B-70 into production, and as mentioned above, that's about the same time that the MiG-25 development began.

  • @gandalfgreyhame3425
    @gandalfgreyhame3425 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was the simple brute force engineering of the time - at the inception of the program in the mid to late 1950s, the Soviets did not have any ability to shoot down such high and fast flying aircraft. And so the XB-70 was designed to fly at Mach 3+ at 70,000 feet because it could outpace and fly higher than anything the Soviets had. By the time the first XB-70 was flying, in 1964, Gary Powers's U-2 had already been shot out of the air at 70,000 feet by Soviet S-75 missiles in 1969. That is what made the bomber obsolete by the time it first flew.

  • @Aeronaut1975
    @Aeronaut1975 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    WTF is "a Fahrenheit" and "an inch" 😋

  • @edutaimentcartoys
    @edutaimentcartoys 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it looks like a white swan

  • @derrickadusei7987
    @derrickadusei7987 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Did you say the Valerie flew again after 60 years

  • @thelizardbrosgaming
    @thelizardbrosgaming 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is the drive worth-it to Dayton, Ohio?

    • @Spectator1959
      @Spectator1959 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      To see the National Museum of the USAF? Oh yes. Go.

  • @DefaultProphet
    @DefaultProphet 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oof imagine this with 8 F35 engines. Diabolical speed

  • @PatrickAustin
    @PatrickAustin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think you have an error? Mach 3.1 is over 2300mph

  • @edwardcaseyjr5490
    @edwardcaseyjr5490 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder if the XB-70 inspired the movie Firefox with Clint Eastwood.😊

    • @wolfshanze5980
      @wolfshanze5980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mig-31 Firefox fighter?
      No, the XB-70 bomber has nothing to do with the Firefox in the movie... at all.

  • @blurglide
    @blurglide 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait...a THIRD one was built?

    • @PilotPhotog
      @PilotPhotog  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Built but never flew - thanks for commenting!

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No. It was canceled 15 February 1964 and never completed. What was under construction was entirely scrapped.

  • @Paleorunner2
    @Paleorunner2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The greatest plane the Air Force never bought! I will always hate McNamara for canceling it.

    • @winternow2242
      @winternow2242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was his boss's decision. Nobody wanted the B-70 by 1961. This was a plane with no supporters at all. This had nothing specifically to do with Mcnamara. And if it did, he was probably right. High-speed/high Altitude hasn't been a viable capability for years.

    • @wolfshanze5980
      @wolfshanze5980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can outrun a fighter but not a SAM... it was a HUGE target easily visible by SAM Radar... a whole lotta NOPES there.

  • @bigmike9128
    @bigmike9128 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    High flying canadian B1A

  • @RakHineUss9
    @RakHineUss9 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rakhine

  • @miker3298
    @miker3298 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Not fit for purpose, took too long to develop, too expensive to maintain and did not have a complete operational requirement. Menawhile the older B52 still flies as the main US bomber.

  • @dunder0827
    @dunder0827 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    oil me up 😫

    • @RobertEpple
      @RobertEpple 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use ky