Thank you so much. It’s amazing how smart you are. I love ❤️ discussion about language because my favorite philosopher is my man Ludwig Wittgenstein even tho I only understand .00001% of what he said. But anything that analyzes language is therefore so appealing to me.
That's the band I play in (lead singer: my daughter, Melanie Luna-find her on Amazon Music, etc., as Melanie Bonevac), recorded live on May 12, 2019. You're hearing an instrumental break in a song called "There Will Be a Day." That's Alex Coke on sax.
Nice lecture, Professor! But isn’t “murder is wrong” able to be ethical both grammatically understood and otherwise (largely from a late Wittgenstein point of view)? As is said in your video, the surface grammar can be misleading, and the true sense of such a claim therefore leads to something like “No murder!”; on the other hand, we can just take the present grammatical structure-but this still can work ethically: imagine during a lecture on ethics, students are asked to give some ethical propositions; someone says “murder is wrong”; it’s clear to see that at this moment “murder is wrong” isn’t making any prescription or other non-descriptive claims-yet we all think this is a legal answer to the teacher’s question. That a sentence is ethical is more down to its particular “use,” I think?
Great video! Hello from London, UK
Hey, thanks!
GENEROSITY YEAAHHHHHHH
Thank you so much. It’s amazing how smart you are. I love ❤️ discussion about language because my favorite philosopher is my man Ludwig Wittgenstein even tho I only understand .00001% of what he said. But anything that analyzes language is therefore so appealing to me.
The intro music makes me think of Adrian Edmondson and Rick Mayal sitting on a bench.
Can we get a video on cognitiveism please
what is the name of your intro track ?
That's the band I play in (lead singer: my daughter, Melanie Luna-find her on Amazon Music, etc., as Melanie Bonevac), recorded live on May 12, 2019. You're hearing an instrumental break in a song called "There Will Be a Day." That's Alex Coke on sax.
Nice lecture, Professor! But isn’t “murder is wrong” able to be ethical both grammatically understood and otherwise (largely from a late Wittgenstein point of view)? As is said in your video, the surface grammar can be misleading, and the true sense of such a claim therefore leads to something like “No murder!”; on the other hand, we can just take the present grammatical structure-but this still can work ethically: imagine during a lecture on ethics, students are asked to give some ethical propositions; someone says “murder is wrong”; it’s clear to see that at this moment “murder is wrong” isn’t making any prescription or other non-descriptive claims-yet we all think this is a legal answer to the teacher’s question. That a sentence is ethical is more down to its particular “use,” I think?
Can you make one about the Error theory
Good idea!
so doxastic attitudes?
What a snoozer
If by any chance you see this check my comment on your previous video I would love you opinion, I won't repost the essay here as to not spam you 😁
5:39
Also, this song
th-cam.com/video/1_xwnb3cymc/w-d-xo.html