Thank you for watching the video. This video is part of a series. Watch the rest: Entire playlist: th-cam.com/play/PL1p7uWYlKNaDy4YKicpKQ6QE0_NTv6r_G.html Part 1: th-cam.com/video/Enb2XE50L4o/w-d-xo.html Part 2: th-cam.com/video/d2yD-QVd-qc/w-d-xo.html Part 3: th-cam.com/video/ojWqAJTdejk/w-d-xo.html Part 4: th-cam.com/video/0X5c0TWu-ao/w-d-xo.html Part 5: th-cam.com/video/IZcZPp1LQKA/w-d-xo.html Part 6: th-cam.com/video/24Qy5sVJjKA/w-d-xo.html Part 7: th-cam.com/video/OKIirgoUWQU/w-d-xo.html Part 8: th-cam.com/video/MkZY2o8XaUo/w-d-xo.html
Who provided the voice template for the A.I.? It has a crisp British accent I find interesting. Though it has those mispronunciations that annoy people, it is still pleasant to listen to.
Second time around, Tobruk was defended by inexperienced South Africans, instead of battle hardened Australians; and that it's previous static defenses had been dismantled. Which is why the South Africans were overcome so swiftly.
@@michaelmcintyre5719The second South African Infantry Division had previously participated in the battles of Bardia, Sollum, and Gazala. What do you have to say now?
The second South African Infantry Division had previously participated in the battles of Bardia, Sollum, and Gazala and were far from inexperienced. The defences of Tobruk had been run down completely and it was never intended to be defended. Auchinlek and Ritchie dropped the South Africans into an untenable situation as they were never supposed to allow themselves to be invested in Tobruk as it was by then indefensible. As usual, the British commanders tried to cover up their incompetence by blaming the South Africans.
Thank you for watching the video. This video is part of a series. Watch the rest:
Entire playlist: th-cam.com/play/PL1p7uWYlKNaDy4YKicpKQ6QE0_NTv6r_G.html
Part 1: th-cam.com/video/Enb2XE50L4o/w-d-xo.html
Part 2: th-cam.com/video/d2yD-QVd-qc/w-d-xo.html
Part 3: th-cam.com/video/ojWqAJTdejk/w-d-xo.html
Part 4: th-cam.com/video/0X5c0TWu-ao/w-d-xo.html
Part 5: th-cam.com/video/IZcZPp1LQKA/w-d-xo.html
Part 6: th-cam.com/video/24Qy5sVJjKA/w-d-xo.html
Part 7: th-cam.com/video/OKIirgoUWQU/w-d-xo.html
Part 8: th-cam.com/video/MkZY2o8XaUo/w-d-xo.html
I always wonder how it must have been like to be these kind of situations. I always do research on true stories like this. Its very fascinating.
Who provided the voice template for the A.I.? It has a crisp British accent I find interesting. Though it has those mispronunciations that annoy people, it is still pleasant to listen to.
This AI guy born in England but must be German and Japanese, he does a lot of WW 2 work
It’s cool, but ads are out of control
I think the German narrator got a big surprise.
Second time around, Tobruk was defended by inexperienced South Africans, instead of battle hardened Australians; and that it's previous static defenses had been dismantled. Which is why the South Africans were overcome so swiftly.
Utter twaddle. Tobruk's defences had been allowed to run down to the point where it was indefensible.
@@MikeWinkyObamaMight I suggest that you read some History Winky before you make such an 'authoritative' assertion?
@@michaelmcintyre5719The second South African Infantry Division had previously participated in the battles of Bardia, Sollum, and Gazala. What do you have to say now?
The second South African Infantry Division had previously participated in the battles of Bardia, Sollum, and Gazala and were far from inexperienced. The defences of Tobruk had been run down completely and it was never intended to be defended. Auchinlek and Ritchie dropped the South Africans into an untenable situation as they were never supposed to allow themselves to be invested in Tobruk as it was by then indefensible. As usual, the British commanders tried to cover up their incompetence by blaming the South Africans.
@@MikeWinkyObama I stand corrected.
Interesting. What is happening at 28:34?
Some one likes to act like an immature teenager.
In other words, they were meant to be cannon fodder to distract the British from the flanking attacks.
The accent should be on "bruk", not "To."