Just in case if anyone still has this same question...the alpha is 3 at the first child of C because children inherit the current alpha/beta of their parents. Alpha and Beta are basically just current temp variables for each node.
Why do we simply ignore the two unknown values in C? if X and Y are less then 2, they would be MIN candidates. its only because the MIN of B is 3 that we can ignore Them. if B was 1 then we should take X and Y into account. which wouldn't be pruning. But now i can see how it is useful in this case.
because whether X and Y is lesser then 2, it would not affect the answer also, so we can neglect them because in the very end they want the max value of the three nodes
two is indeed less than alpha at 7:26...so confusing
he meant to say whether 2 > a, not 2
"is 2 greater than (a=3)? no its not" lmao
In the exploring the first child of C, you said is 2
Yeah exactly... how is it? Please someone answer.. I need this.
Thanks
Just in case if anyone still has this same question...the alpha is 3 at the first child of C because children inherit the current alpha/beta of their parents. Alpha and Beta are basically just current temp variables for each node.
Bojana Drangova B
Best,excellent,irreplaceable use whatever good words exists in this world to explain the quality of this video.
alpha = 3 ... and you ask - Is 2 less than alpha .. no, it's not, so we keep the 2... you got messed up at D...
Shouldn't the Beta value be updated to 2 at a certain point?
4:33 I wonna to be a cowboy. yeah
At 7:24, when we expand C to left of node value 2, shouldn't we say the 2 greater than alpha since it is min and function , and less than the beta.
Best explanation ever! very intuitive, thanks a lot!
Dude,, you need to revisit the video ,, great work though .. thanks for making it :)
explain please
Shouldn't there be an alpha and beta value for each child ?
how to apply alpha beta prunning to the card game "Beat the Buzzard"?
8:00 Could we have stopped when a=b (As we always need x>=a and x
I was asking the same
Oh, I know, because if you encounter the value of 4 in the next branch, you might wanna take that value of 4 (a=4, b=4)
thank you so much, this really helped!
He is not clearly stating the universal rules this could use some work
Why do we simply ignore the two unknown values in C? if X and Y are less then 2, they would be MIN candidates. its only because the MIN of B is 3 that we can ignore Them. if B was 1 then we should take X and Y into account. which wouldn't be pruning. But now i can see how it is useful in this case.
because whether X and Y is lesser then 2, it would not affect the answer also, so we can neglect them because in the very end they want the max value of the three nodes
how does the successor returns the action?
and stores the values v to a node.
very nice explanition
nice explainantion, keep it up
not understand
What specifically?
@@fiacobelli thx for asking, but the test is over and I think I'm fine without fully getting this pruning idea. Great video BTW.
Get an iPad and an Apple Pen