Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
I like most yaesu transceivers. I have FT-950, FT-1000MP, FT-1000MP V Field and FT-2000. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The best sounding transceiver I have is a FT101B from the 1970s.
I agree FT101B & 101E are better sounding transceivers with less bells & whistles of modern radios. Yaesu indeed has a certain class but Icom & Kenwood are bit different in otherways
Not sure what I am hearing. Different speakers, microphone definitely favouring the 1kMP. Also, are filters he same? Sound as if the 2k had a narrower filter. I know that the 1k has a better receiver than the 2k, but it shouldn't be so much different IMHO. 73 de HA5XA
Thanks for comments, Well there is visible difference and builtin soeakers been used from the transceivers and no filtering at all same audio settings and volume level with same antenna. 73s
Well I think FT2000 has less high frequency output as its builting speaker delivers more lower frequency sound than the higher pitches. With an external speaker sound is much of all range with more high pitch sound output. That Many amateurs note with the FT-2000. Yaesu has use different built-in speaker that FT-1000MP in my opinion. But you noted difference very well. BTW Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
Must test those on the same external speaker to get the best comparison
Interesting comparsion. There is a difference. TNX
Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
I like most yaesu transceivers. I have FT-950, FT-1000MP, FT-1000MP V Field and FT-2000. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The best sounding transceiver I have is a FT101B from the 1970s.
I agree FT101B & 101E are better sounding transceivers with less bells & whistles of modern radios. Yaesu indeed has a certain class but Icom & Kenwood are bit different in otherways
1000 sounds hissing the 2000 more natural. Could be due internal speaker since they say that the 1000 was a better quality build.
Supervideo.Yhankns you very much.
you are welcome
Valeu macanudo boa noite lido radio
Not sure what I am hearing. Different speakers, microphone definitely favouring the 1kMP. Also, are filters he same? Sound as if the 2k had a narrower filter. I know that the 1k has a better receiver than the 2k, but it shouldn't be so much different IMHO. 73 de HA5XA
Thanks for comments, Well there is visible difference and builtin soeakers been used from the transceivers and no filtering at all same audio settings and volume level with same antenna. 73s
Mark V analog wins again. The 2000 Generation wasnt good. The best of all time. 1000D. Still the king.
I can not agree more you just nailed it. Best 73s
Which is better in your opinion, the FT1000D or the FT1000MKV?
In my personal MKV was better than FT1000D, what do you think?
Big difference. That ft2000 is deaf. One would think that a more recent radio is better on receive..
Well I think FT2000 has less high frequency output as its builting speaker delivers more lower frequency sound than the higher pitches. With an external speaker sound is much of all range with more high pitch sound output. That Many amateurs note with the FT-2000. Yaesu has use different built-in speaker that FT-1000MP in my opinion. But you noted difference very well. BTW Many Thanks for watching my videos. Please Subscribe it means a lot to my hobby and will encourage me to make more videos like this. Thanks Stay Safe best regards from The Netherlands Cheers.
Сначала надо создать одинаковые условия , потом делать выводы .