Who Will Replace The BIG 3 Once They Retire?...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2022
- Who Will Replace The BIG 3 Once They Retire?...
It's hard to put into words what Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have done in the game. With a combined 63 slams, 102 Masters 1000, and almost 900 weeks shared among them so far, you have to wonder why they are so good. Here are a few reasons
Channel inspired by Channel inspired by TennisTV, TENNIS TALK with Cam Williams, WTA, Tennistic Productions, CULT TENNIS
Inspired by Who Are The Top Tennis Players Who NEVER Won A Slam?
Inspired by Are Modern Tennis Players Better Than Those In The 80s & 90s?
Inspired by WHERE ARE THEY NOW? Tennis Stars Of The 90s
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/tennisplusyt
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/tennisplusyt
For copyright matters relating to our channel please contact us directly at : luxurypluschannel@gmail.com
In this video we go over tennis,tennis plus,roland garros,wimbledon,us open,australian open,carlos alcaraz,rafael nadal,roger federer,novak djokovic,who will replace the big 3,Who Will Replace The BIG 3 Once They Retire?...,big 3 tennis,Daniil Medvedev,Alexander Zverev,Nick Krygios,Taylor Fritz,Frances Tiafoe,Jannik Sinner,Matteo Berrettini,Stefanos Tsitsipas,Casper Ruud,Andrey Rublev,Dominic Thiem,Cameron Norrie,Dennis Shapovalov,Hubert Hurkacz,next gen tennis players
#rogerfederer #carlosalcaraz #rafaelnadal - กีฬา
Small correction: Kyrgios never won a masters 1000
I don't think there will be another big 3 for a while. We'll see rivalries form, but from what I'm seeing we'll have a more spread out talent pool with the coming generation, much like the 80's and 90's with maybe one or two dominating the field more than most, but not to the extent of the big three.
Tbh, I hope you right. This era was incredible but had also put so many great players in the enormous shadow of the Big 3...
Nope
@@kinomanssky when more players are in with a shout of winning big titles, the unpredictability must be more exciting than the past 15 years.
I am rooting for Ruud, Sinner, Alcaraz, Medvedev to be the next Big 4.
needs to see more from Ruud, he hasnt had any big wins vs big players yet
@@xilunjiang2558 well, if it’s gonna be a big 4, somebody needs to be Murray, don’t they? And Norway’s pretty close to Scotland! 😅
Zverev, Tsitsipas?
Absolutely agree this is the new order from the looks of things. Alcaraz to me seems poised to be the man unless he gets injured. Ruud will win multiple slams. I believe Sinner will be in that top 3 as well. Medvedev is obviously in that mix as well.
Medvedev is too old, he is 26 now he will probably retire sooner than Djokovic if Djokovic can play 5-6 years more. I am rooting for Alcaraz, Sinner and FAA
Alcaraz is going to rule. A fit Zverev is a problem for literally everyone on your. And Big 3 have always struggled playing against him. Others have opponents that they struggle against. But the best of that lot is Medvedev.
So these three. And may be Sinner (2023 is a huge year for him progression wise. He needs to win multiple titles and be top 5).
Let's just pretend that we don't want to replace them, because it's impossible. Let's just enjoy the new players and that's it.
I don't think there will ever be a big three.Nadal,Fed and the Djoker won 63 grand slams and over 102 .atp 1000 master series combined.
That will never happen again not to that extent
Zverev's ankle injury is much worse than we think.
people throwing next big 3 names like this is a regular thing .. do you know how rare it is in any sport that 3 players called goats play at the same time ? its the same in football with messi and cr7 even two at the same time is very rare .. the only potential of becoming a goat status one day is alcaraz all others can achieve great things but not end up in the goat debate so there will never be another big 3 in my opinion ..
I don’t think he’s suggesting that anyone will replace them as GOATs, just as the dominant group at the top of tennis when they’ve all retired. I think the more likely scenario is that you maybe have a group of 6-8 players at the top with a gap to the rest, which could actually make things a little more interesting, since there’d be a number of people at each big tournament with a realistic chance of winning it.
@@richietaylor9870 yes i see it the same way will be interesting .. but i think alcaraz gonna make big moves and i see sinner fighting for gs constantly at some point too kyrgios looks hungry very intrtesting to see what he does the next 1-3 years ..
The reason the "Big 3" won everything is that the overall level on the tour was incredibly weak.
Thankfully, it's a rare occurrence indeed. Reminded me of women's tennis in the 1980s, when Navratilova and Evert split most titles between them.
@@fundhund62 I wonder how much their longevity helps, and I further wonder how much sports technology has to do with that. Footwear for example, is so much more advanced than it was in the 80s or 90s. Does this protect players joints so they can play til their late thirties, in contrast to earlier eras where they’d very rarely play much past 30? Do racket technology, analytical software, nutritional advances allow players to amplify the marginal advantages they have over other players, thereby making the rest of the field look relatively weaker.
This is why comparing players across eras is always dodgy. Would Henri Leconte (highest ranking, 5) have beaten Andrey Rublev (5)? How would Yannick Noah (3) fare against Marin Cilic? I’d say the later players look stronger.
@@fundhund62 The big 3’s competition was not incredibly weak, they are just incredibly great.
Considering that Alcaraz is the current world number 1, it’s fair to say that he has proven to tennis fans that he is truly the real deal.
Ruling ATP in the future i meant to say, not the final! Lol
In my opinion the three best players in 2 years are going to be Alcaraz, Sinner and Auger-Aliassime
I dont get it why people think FAA is that good... He is really really overrated..
FAA I don't think so. Maybe Medvedev and a healthy Zverev
@@Nikica40fax bro he’s mediocre at best
They are irreplaceable
There will never be such complete dominance on the tour ever again. Period.
03:19, you said that Kyrgios has won a Masters at Cincinnati, which is incorrect. Kyrgios is yet to win a masters, sadly. His biggest titles have been 500 events (Washington, Tokyo, acapulco)
I was gonna say. Grigor beat him in the final
alternative title: Best players right now under the age of 30
Sinner is my favourite from the new generation. Also as a polish person I wanna see Hubi reach the top, but I feel like he needs to be more consistent
Agreed. He is highly underrated (they only mentioned him for like 10 seconds) and has beaten current world number 1 Alcaraz on two occasions this year, the only player to do so.
Men's tennis needs Swiatek's level of a talent to really break the mold and Hurkacz is just too many tiers below i'm afraid...
I can't see Hurkacz dominating tennis in a world of Medvedev, Tsitsipas, Zverev, Sinner, Rune, Alcaraz or even Auger-Aliassime! It just ain't gonna happen...if you expect, that he will you are only setting yourself up for disappointment...
But he is not alone in this! For example Cameron Norrie also belong to his tier and several american players like Tiafoe or Fritz...Shapovalov, Berettini and co are also on the same tier as Hurkacz! Non of them will be winning any grand slams in future...at very most if they are lucky with the draw maybe one or two of them will break through and win just one grand slam in post-big3 world! But even then, i don't see Hurkacz being amongst those few lucky ones! It's more likely to be Berettini or Shapovalov...
Alcaraz probably dominate the tour for a while. None of these others dudes aside from him seem all around and consistent. People don’t realize how incredibly lucky it was to have Federer, nadal and Djokovic from like 2006-2015 pretty sure only 3 or 4 other players won slams
I bet on Alcaraz and Sinner for sure. After I have a lot of doubts, but I like FAA's upside
sinner injury prone played around 180 matches but yet to touch win% of 70
1. Alcaraz....
2. Sinner
The rest: Zverev, Ruud, Medvedev, Kyrgios, Auger-Aliassime
Kyrigos is just meh. too immature mentally
1: Sinner
2:Alcaraz
@@captainchaos1311 Alcaraz has almost three times the points Sinners has right now. Sinner is great, and produces high quality tennis against Alcaraz. But somehow only has 2220 points as of right now.
@@mcclimnie518 Sinner just needs to get himself past quarter finals which are plaguing him. one grand slam win and his rankings will go up. he has already shown that he could beat acaraz at the us open being at match point
@@captainchaos1311 I don't see sny evidence he's better than Alcaraz. He's older and just not as good in winning matches. I do see he's a bad matchup for Alcaraz and he will beat Alcaraz a lot more in the future. But he's not even top 10 right now.
Medvedev, Alcaraz, Ruud, Sinner, Kyrgios.
Never will we see the big three replicated!!
Alcaraz and Sinner are both the best all-round player in the ATP right now. Djokovic has a task ahead of him. Lorenzo Musetti will be dangerous on clay. Tiafoe should do well indoors. Tsitsipas will continue to be solid, but still I don't see him getting through the growing youngster brigade.
BIG 3 will never be replaced
well if there is another player as good as them they will
@@xilunjiang2558 no never they will be successful but not like them. I don't see that happenning
They said the same thing about Sampras
@@Courtside_Tennis yeah but this time it will be different
Sinner and Alcaraz will dominate Tennis
Alcaraz, Ruud and Sinner.
Great vid. I most certainly don't wanna sound like the "Uh! Actually..." guy, but since you could have to talk about him often in the future, just know that Félix's name is actually pronounced with soft G and an É sound at the end, so pretty much "OJ" (O-Jay) without the D sound in the J.
Thank you! Will note that for my next video!
@@Courtside_Tennis You're welcome. Our frenchie names are tough to anglophones, I totally get that. 😀
Carlos has the what it takes. I’m placing my money on him.
Don't think you could ever replace the Big 3. Over 62 single majors combine. Won't happen in my lifetime
Norrie is 6 months older than Meddy (and 9 months older than Berrettini). He hasn’t achieved as much as Medvedev but it’s maybe a touch too early to be branding him the old man of tennis.
Lorenzo Musetti is imo missing on that discussion, of course he is not "there" now, but give him 2 years and he is capable of win-streaking
1. Alcaraz, 2. Sinner and 3. Zverev thats my prediction.
Alcaraz
Sinner
Rudd
Alcaraz; Sinner; Ruud
rune*
Hope Thiem does not face so much injuries like Delpo and finally gets rid of them
1. Alcaraz
2. Sinner
3. Medvedev
4. Felix
Tsitsipas and Zverev are already washed. Maybe one or two grand slams for them throughout their career. Nobody else on this list will win a slam aside from Berrettini (if he improves his backhand)
Love Felix, but he is the next Nalbandian - solid, but no slams. There is that killer fighter instinct he doesn't possess. Top 3 are spot on
There will never be a big three again. Alcaraz won at 19 everyone else on the tour has been there for sometime no grand clams. That era of tennis will never be again.
One correction -you mention Alcaraz as a 'Future World no. 1' but he is already World no. 1 :)
Haha when I made this video he hadn't won yet. Thankfully he made good on that comment I made
Nobody. Because nobody will dominate tennis like the big 3. Those 3 were just in a class by themselves.
Anyone thinking an American becoming part of next big thing is living a fool's dream. The whole American tennis circuit has become a pile of money hungry rats. This just proves how Pete, Agassi and John were committed to the sport. Such era will never come for US sadly.
The only barrier to big 3 is injury which comes from the extreme physicality of the next gen's style of play and the poor tacticality of their current game plan.
The next gen don't have more physical game styles really, especially if you compare them to the young big three.
Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas and Alcaraz.
A year or two ago, I believed Thiem was the front runner but not now.
Zverev and Tsitsipas need to win a slam first
@@RR_theproahole Zverev and Tsitsipas have a better chance of winning their first slam than Thiem has a chance of winning another one in my opinion. I like Thiem a lot, but he is struggling to get his top form back again. Zverev is still recovering from his ankle injury so I guess at this moment I'd have to go with Tsitsipas, Medvedev and Alcaraz as the top contenders to replace the Big 3 as of this moment.
Add Ruud to the discussion also. He has been to two slam finals compared to one each for Tsitsipas and Zverev.
The Big 3 are irreplaceable but Alcaraz, Sinner, Rune and Auger Aliassime will be their successors. These four will move past Medvedev, Tsitspas and co in the near future.
Draper, Lehechka, and Forjeteck
There will never be the Next big 3..... This phrase " The big 3" should be copyrighted and should never be allowed to use so loosely.. The word big 3 should always remind us of federer nadal and djokovic...
Kyrgios has never won a M1000 btw only Washington twice and Acapulco I believe for the 500's
Nobody, If these young guys were on their level they would be beating them now. The big three would dominate all of them at their age. They lose the majority of the time now when the big three are old.
There are 10 or 15 players that can be grand slam winners.
I don't see any dominator,surely Alcaraz is the best beetween the next gen and the one who jas the best chances to win slam.
I seriously doubt any new ones will ever come close to the three greats ever
The young Greek is not on the same level as Carlitos or Sinner.
Alcaraz, sinner and Felix
Alcatraz and Sinner will be two of the big three . The other one could be anyone who has been mentioned in the video.
It’s Coric
Alcatraz is a prison, mate
Sinner, Alcaraz, Ruud
Kyrgios never won Cincinatti
Hay muchos jugadores excelentes el tenis tiene futuro
You simply analysed the best players in the ATP, but being good is not enough to achieve what the big 3 did (not even being able to beat them in 1 match at their age)
Most of the players mentioned in the video just don't have what it takes to "dominate the game" like they did
Alcaraz, Sinner, Meddy
Djokovic and Nadal aren’t going anywhere.
tsistipas in a thumb nail lol, among current players only alacaraz has chance because he has reached 75 win % so quickly , sinner felix tsitsipas shapovalov ,zverev are yet to touch a win % of 70, so only alcaraz has chance if he improves serve and reduces ue, and along with alcaraz musetti and rune are having slim chances but they should reach win% of 75 as early as possible.
1.Alcatraz.
2.Rudd.
3.Daniil Medvedev.
From Bangladesh 🇧🇩
রুড হবে না--- উনি হারিয়ে যাবে। Sinner will break it out
@@mdabdulnaeem5317 রুডের ফোরহ্যান্ড এবং বেস লাইন খারাপ না।অপজিশনের ড্রপ শর্টে নেট কাভার করতে পারে ভালো,দেখা যাক ভবিষ্যই বলে দেবে, কারণ টেনিসে ইনজুরি একটা ফেক্টর।
@@merajm.pathan7553 হ্যাঁ, ইনজুরি টা প্রভাব বিস্তার করে। এন্ডি,ডমেনিক,স্টান ওরা এখনো সংগ্রাম করছে চোট সারিয়ে।
কিন্তু নাদাল,জোকোভিচ, ফেদেরার এঁরা ইনজুরি থেকে ফিরে আরও ভয়ংকর হতে দেখেছি🤔।
যা-হোক আমার কার্লিতোকে ভাল লাগে একটু। স্টেফানোর এক হাতের ব্যাক হ্যান্ডের জন্য ভাল লাগে মাঝে মাঝে।
আমি বলি
মেদভেদেব, জেরেভ,স্টেফানো,কার্লিতো, এরা একটু আকটু ধারাবাহিক থাকবে। নিক,বারেত্তিনি,সিনার,রুড,রুভলেভ এরা কিছু ক্ষেত্রে চমক দিবে।
Alcaraz Sinner and Ruud
Alcaraz,Sinner,Ruud,Felix augur.
Hey look, another TH-camr posting videos about how some random Top 20 guys can replace Big 3 .. 😂😂😂
1. Kyrgios
2. Everyone else
...
**Wakes up in a pool of sweat**
You talk about Sinner for less than 20 seconds?! I would think he deserves more than that, top 10 at age 20?
Batista agut?? Fritz?? I mean they're good but comeon.. Pretty generous list IMO. The most important tool is mentality and movement and Alcaraz, sinner, medvedev stand out
Hopefully no one. I have hated the fact that its just been 3 players winning everything for 20 years. I heard the 80s and 90s were exciting
No one because for to have a big 3 ou must have 3 players who win at least 8 GC each in the same area. When this thing will appear we could say who are the big 3.
Alcatraz, Sinner & Rudd…
It doesn't have to be 3. It could be 2 or 4 or maybe just a lone Alcaraz dominating.
Berretini like Federer, Del Potro and Thiem has had too many surgeries to be a contendor
Alcaraz, Rudd and Sinner will be next top 3
I don’t see Ruud doing it.
He will be more like Murray but with competition for that spot from the others.
I really think Coric is going to be the other one once he gets his consistency back.
@@westonmeyer3110 interesting but he is 26 and couldn't prove himself yet. Rudd is just 22-23 and already reached 2 grand slams final and became world num 2. Let's see..good luck to both!
@@harsshitntripathi
Coric has been out for a long time with injury like Thiem has been and Zverev is now. When he was healthy he was almost a top 10 player despite being scrawny and inexperienced. He has a winning record against Nadal, Zverev, Shapo, Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Ruud and Tiafoe while being even with Kyrgios and he is one win away from being on even terms with Thiem. The only top players who aren’t retired to consistently beat him are Rublev for some reason and Novak and he has never played Sinner or Alcaraz.
With a full season of good health he will be dangerous in every tournament next year and his only points will come from Cincinnati and maybe Tokyo and other late year tournaments so his rank will only climb from where he is at to top 10 status and probably top 5(he only made it to the 2nd round at Australia, Roland Garros and the US Open while pulling out of Wimbledon due to injury this year so he can cover a lot of ground just by winning a few matches in majors next year)
He has the same build as Alcaraz but with a much more powerful serve and Sinner’s backhand. He will be a good rival for Alcaraz for at least 7 years or so.
@@westonmeyer3110 let's pray for him to have better health..we need players like him, sinner and Alcaraz specially after retirement of Big4..Tennis needs to be equally competitive and interesting
@@harsshitntripathi
He should be fine now. He had wrist problems in 2019 and then shoulder surgery in 2021 but right now he is just working the kinks out playing top level tennis again and then he should be right there in the thick of things.
I can’t wait until he plays Laver cup for the first time. Maybe he could play doubles with Alcaraz for team Europe.
Hopefully he annihilates Shapo this morning and then he can start to get into the groove for next year.
Correction: Kyrgios didnt win the Masters 1000 :)
So far its only sinner and carlos
Alcaraz and Sinner will be there. Not sure about the third.
Alcaraz for sure, then my guess, Al Assime, Ruud, Sinner.
A revolving door
Rooting for Felix!
Oh no God forbid Tsitsipas been up there in the big 3
I am rooting for Sinner, Rune, Alcaraz and auger Aliassime
Kyrgios never won Cincinnati. He hasn't won any Masters 1000 yet.
My money’s on Donald Young
Sinner, Alcaraz and Ruud are already great players. They will be there on the top for years, if they can avoid injuries. They all seem to be very tough mentally.
Alkaraz, Ruud and Sinner are my picks
Zverev and Medvedev>>>> Ruud
Nobody will replace them: but alcaraz
Weird that you name the likes of Norrie, Hurkacz and Bautista Agut but not actual talents like Draper, Musetti and Rune
Norrie is very good.
Rune will be in this discussion very soon.
@@keithcampbell6806
As will Coric
Honestly, Kyrgios is just the average Aussie
There will never be another Big 3. It was a lightning strike era that will not likely be repeated. Alcaraz could be the next exciting thing - hard to say b/c 2022 tennis rankings and tournaments got majorly f'd up with all the government policies banning Djokovic from Australia and the U.S. and Wimbledon points not counting -- so Alcaraz isn't a true world no. 1 in the eyes of avid tennis fans. But credit to Alcaraz for seizing his opportunity and winning UO. And just for the sake of argument about a potential Little 3, this list is too long. You lost me at Taylor Fritz and Tiafoe... Tiafoe has one 250 title and he's 24 years old. Likewise, Taylor Fritz has 2 titles, but Indian Wells Nadal had a fractured rib. Kyrgios is already too old to try and his entitled temper tantrums belong in a MMA cage fight. The toughest one is Thiem, whose tennis was fierce but he may never get back to his same level again. I love Rublev but he only has 2 gears. Berrettini gets injured too often. Casper Ruud is certainly a dark horse but his tennis is so boring. My contenders are Alcaraz, Meddy, Tsitsipas, Sinner - Zverev maybe if he recovers but yuck -- all I see is him choking out his ex-girlfriend, not a great image for tennis. Remember that each of the Big 3 won at least 1 slam by the time they were 21 years old, so only one that comes close to having that start is Alcaraz. But I will add that Tsitsipas and Meddy are the only ones on my list who've beaten the Big 3 at a slam -- and Alcaraz hasn't yet had to meet the Big 3 (now Big 2) in a slam. Even if he does, only Nole will be in peak form unless it's Nadal at French Open where he somehow becomes superhuman even with a broken foot. If we keep obsessing about who's replacing the Big 3 and slam counts, we're missing the point. This young generation is playing at insane levels - their athleticism has never been seen before in tennis and it's a joy to watch them flying around the courts.
I agree, this year was definitely and asterisk year when it comes to final rankings.
There will be no big 3 for sure, let’s hope there will be a big 1 and i have one player in mind, hoping he’ll prove me right next season
I say since april 2022 that alcaraz will be the best player of all time. He is already pretty close
Kyrgios maybe...
Give credit when you use content innit?
I can see Alcaraz and Zverev being 2/3
Alcatraz Ruud Tsitsipas but my favorite is Tsitsipas
Anyone but Zverev
Alcaraz, Ruud, and Medvedev are your sure bet in the years to come! Then come Sinner, Zverev, Kyrgios and the rest. Still, none of these is likely get even near the results of the big three in my opinion. Alcaraz is the only one who has a chance to win 10+ (maybe even 15, 16 GS titles), and the others can consider themselves extremely lucky if they get to 7 or 8.
Sinner is better than Alcaraz play wise but doesnt have as good stamina.
He won 2 tie breaks sets. If Carlos hadn't been so wasteful he easily could've straight setted him.
@@iannovak5223 Sinner beat him the two matches before the US Open. The US Open was ridiculous. They played till 3 am.
@@joevelte4252 They're 2-2 in h2h. Alcaraz finished even later than Sinner did with his Cilic match, so that's not an excuse.
And like I said, it should've been straight set win for Carlos but he was too wasteful, that'll improve in the coming years.
1. Kyrgios
2.Medvedev
3.Zverev
Big 3 and average 20.
Was that the weakest top 20 ever? Was too easy for 3playes
Carlitos Ruud Medvedev Alexander
alcaraz-sinner.
faluire grend slam all i can say about it
Kyrgios does not even have a M1OOO Trophy🤡🤡 how can you upload a video saying he won Cincinnati??
Alcaraz,Sinner,Zeverev, Tsisipas, Ruud. Shapovalov has all big serve ,backhand and forehand but too inconsistent and mentally weak.