NASA will delay Artemis 2 and 3 missions
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2024
- NASA will announce plans to push back the launch dates for Artemis 2 and Artemis 3. There are technical issues they need to correct.
Subscribe to FOX 26 Houston: th-cam.com/users/myfoxhouston2...
Watch FOX 26 Houston Live: www.fox26houston.com/live
Houston area news, weather, traffic, sports and breaking news from FOX 26 Houston. Watch news and local programming daily from KRIV.
Watch more FOX 26 Houston on TH-cam:
What's Your Point?: • What's Your Point?
Isiah Factor Uncensored: • Isiah Factor Uncensored
Positively Houston: • Positively Houston
Download the FOX 26 Houston News app: fox26houston.onelink.me/xslh?...
Download the FOX 26 Houston Weather app: www.fox26houston.com/apps
Follow FOX 26 Houston on Facebook: / fox26houston
Follow FOX 26 Houston on Twitter: / fox26houston
Follow FOX 26 Houston on Instagram: / fox26houston
Subscribe to the FOX 26 Houston newsletter: www.fox26houston.com/newsletters
Practice makes perfect 🤣
Peregrine did this. NASA has the instructions for success but keeps to themselves. Understandably so.
Imagine India or China or a combination of other countries got there before uncle Sam did, does certainly either cast doubt on the original 69 landing or put into perspective of how massively lucky they were to make it there and back given the tech of that era compared to present times
Don't worry india and china will never send humans in moon in near future because they know what kind of drama happened in 1969😂😂😂
@@rajeshx1983yeah the dram which was never exposed by USSR 😂😂😂 USA's main rival who never landed on moon.
why would it cast any doubt? Another contries satelites literally shot evidence of Apollo-11 landing site on the Moon
its not tech its budget, today NASA gets less than 0.5% of the federal budget in funding. Not all of that goes into Artemis because all the space telescopes, robotic missions, ISS, and earth science needs funding too. Meanwhile at the height of the Apollo Program the had more that 5% of the federal budget to bring to bare on putting humans on the moon. Even then development of the Apollo program and Saturn V took 9 years from start to boots on the moon. SLS has been on and off development since 2011 but the Artemis program only really began in 2017. So for having a minuscule in comparison ammount of funding compared to Apollo I think NASA is doing rather well as far as its timeline
@@Araj763 Cuz they are frauds too, encase you haven't realize they have a space agency.😆😆😆
i know it , i know
I would like to see more diversity, like in the trucking industry! Don't forget the side mirrors.
54 years of successful LAUNCHES, just never went anywhere
went into space
@@capybarinya 🤭😁 nope
The first landing was successful and that all what matter 😂
@@bakedbeans3181 Proof?
@@Paep50 🍿🤭😄
NASA SP287 " " WHAT MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? "
" of course , the way we got this job done was with meeting , big meetings , little meeting hundreds of meetings ! the thing we always tried to do in these meetings was to encourage every one , no matter how shy , to speak out "
WHY DON'T SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT IS ULTIMATE SECRET TO MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? YOU CAN GO TO THE MOON WITH " DON'T SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT ??? " 🤔🤔🤔
KAMALA . ..LOL BEST PUNCHLINE YET 😂
They need more funding for the 4k UHD special effects department studio. You know everyone & his/hers/their’s dog in Hollywood have been going on strike.😅
😂😂😂😂 is this ironic or are you being serious?
@@TurdBoi-tf5lf He's dead seriously tarded. 😂
I would speculate that they cant solve the Radiation issues and the AstroRad Vests designed to protect Women failed.
too small ship
@@yoskarokuto3553 its bigger than the apollo capsule lol.
@@Vsor I love watching people obliviously make wrong statements on the internet like those other two in this thread lol
Gee, who could've predicted they would stall and stall and stall when it came time to send people and actually get near the surface?
Oh wait, I've been predicting this BS screen for years. Weren't we supposed to be living on Mars by now, tee hee😂?
Artemis 1 happened in 2022 , it was supposed to have happened by 2017 , it was long overdue but it happened
Artemis 2 and 3 will happen later than what we would have wanted , but they will happen
I get why you are cynical, but no matter the delay, humanity is going back to the moon
@mariolis Yes, it did. And the people in charge could have easily sent it close enough to the surface, near the landing sites to shut up every moon landing denier in the world forever. And they didn't. Don't you find that just a little weird?
@@RodCalidge Because that was not the purpose of Artemis 1 ? And you would need a telescope anyway ... But even so , even if they bring a telescope on Artemis 2 and get detailed photos of the apollo sites, Im pretty sure you deniers would just make up an excuse as to why they are not real or something
Always moving the goal posts no matter how much evidence is presented
@mariolis Just like the excuses you just made for why they didn't? Self-awareness is a heckuva drug.
They MUST believe it. Otherwise they will be shunned by family and friends. Bunch of cowards trying to be popular. @@RodCalidge
54 years pass...( tech development need time )
success score ( 60's apollo with analog simple tech 6 : 0 artemis with nano tech 2024 )
nasa sp 287 " what made apollo a success ? "
What made apollo a success ?
An almost infinite amount of funding until the race was over
That is what Nasa doesn't have now and why it's taking so long to get back
Imagine if we had gone to the peak of Mount Everest a handful of times in the '60s and '70s, but couldn't go back in 2024.
@derp8575 we've been "on the Everest" in the '70s, threw away the hiking equipment, because we have 0 reasons to come back, close the factories that produce hiking equipment, because we have 0 purposes for that when we climb our local hill (ISS). And then, in 2024, we need to build those factories back, and then make new, better hiking equipment, because now we have reasons to come back.
In some kind of hollyweird way, but no, FALSE 😄
Well put!@@capybarinya
The money we give to NASA would be better use for securing our border and increasing police salaries
You know.. things that matter here on earth
maybe instead of taking money from NASA's budget, which is around 20 billion dollars per year, you should use better the money from the military budget, which is almost 900 billion dollars (40% of the worldwide military budget). Space research is useful for a lot of purposes, for example a lot of medicines and materials need to be tested without gravity on the iss, and when we will land and build a permanent base on the moon there will be a lot of experiments there too that will bring innovations also on earth.
Police don't need more money. Police will kill us all if the state order it
@@ilbananitoconijeans3497 He's just too shortsighted
Or maybe take 20% of US military budget and have both NASA and borders be well funded
@@Frank_SB the moon landing was faked
(( Google's AI Says Moon Landing Photos/Videos Are Fake )) russia never said anything about apollo...really ???
Soviet Union during the height of the cold war tracked all Apollo launches additionally gave a public congratulations to the US after Apollo 11. That should be all the evidence the conspiracy theorist need to realize we went to the moon
@@apollo4619I agree but if we don't get a camera I d be suspicious.
(( Google's AI Says Moon Landing Photos/Videos Are Fake ))
(( my grandpa says that clouds are made from storyfoam ))
Why are all the least educated people leaving multiple ignorant and incorrect coments under the same video is beyond me.