Something very fast with a hard shell that don't easily get break up after the first hit lol by a missile or rockets very dense skin and about the payloads it should have weapons bay on both sides to pack 3 or 4 maybe 5 missiles or rockets whatever you want to put in it lol
For the BMD design: 96 VLS cells is not much for such a huge ship
They are actually looking closer at the 288 vls cell design.
No, the Navy isn't interested in so many VLS Cells.
HIL said they could add more, but the Navy is not up for it.
Kack Boon yes it's a shame all that deck space. The Russians believe in fire power, the US doesn't seem to want to match them.
Agreed, it should sport at least 150 VLS cells, Burkes have 96. Also it looks awful, no sleekness, no stealth...All together a flop.
Something very fast with a hard shell that don't easily get break up after the first hit lol by a missile or rockets very dense skin and about the payloads it should have weapons bay on both sides to pack 3 or 4 maybe 5 missiles or rockets whatever you want to put in it lol
... a lot of deck space for BMD... those can be used for additional aircrafts such as VTOL V-22 or F-35 or Ah-64 or Ah-1Z...
The lighting strike looks like a perfect fit for the air born laser, with the extra electricity.
600lbs payload that one or two weapons or ammo
About RAILGUNS what is D.C.N waiting for ??? thanks 4 sharing : )
'
this video at 450 to 520...
not good design...
many jets / drinking waste gas / too heavy weight...
not good idea
7:09 i think u mean 2016 not 1916
What's that song that plays in the beginning?
5:35 EL MATAPAJAROS
A Russian reports on our weapons? WTF