Hashgraph: The Blockchain Killer? (w/ Leemon Baird)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 มิ.ย. 2019
  • Will the future be written on the blockchain? Or will a competing technology become even more important? Leemon Baird, the computer scientist behind hashgraph, explains why his distributed ledger technology could serve as a superior alternative to blockchain. This clip is excerpted from a video published on Real Vision on February 7, 2018.
    Watch more Real Vision™ videos: po.st/RealVisionVideos
    Subscribe to Real Vision™ on TH-cam: po.st/RealVisionSubscribe
    Watch more by starting your 14-day free trial here: rvtv.io/2Y3ZqEj
    About The Creators of Crypto:
    What is the future of money? Pioneers in the cryptocurrency space share their views on what opportunities and risks lie ahead in the brave new world of money.
    About Real Vision™:
    Real Vision™ is the destination for the world’s most successful investors to share their thoughts about what’s happening in today's markets. Think: TED Talks for Finance. On Real Vision™ you get exclusive access to watch the most successful investors, hedge fund managers and traders who share their frank and in-depth investment insights with no agenda, hype or bias. Make smart investment decisions and grow your portfolio with original content brought to you by the biggest names in finance, who get to say what they really think on Real Vision™.
    Connect with Real Vision™ Online:
    Twitter: rvtv.io/2p5PrhJ
    Instagram: rvtv.io/2J7Ddlw
    Facebook: rvtv.io/2NNOlmu
    Linkedin: rvtv.io/2xbskqx
    Leemon Baird on Hashgraph: The Blockchain Killer?
    / realvisiontelevision
    Transcript:
    For the full transcript visit: rvtv.io/2Y3ZqEj
    LEEMON BAIRD: Hashgraph is a way of making a distributed ledger work. In other words, it's a
    way to have a bunch of computers come to an agreement on the order of our transactions of the
    things that we're doing. And it also puts timestamps on them.
    So we have an agreement that this transaction was first and this one with second, not the other
    way around. And we have an agreement that this transaction happened at noon on Tuesday. And
    the whole community is agreeing on this.
    And that's what every deal team needs to do. Every distributed ledger comes to agreement on
    ordering and timestamps. And that's what Hashgraph does. But it does it in a very strange way,
    not the normal way of doing things.
    It is not like proof of work. You do not have to buy a super-computer to run a node. In fact, we
    have full nodes that are Raspberry Pis, you know these little tiny $30 computers. My small cell
    phone, of course, is far more powerful than you would need to be a full node. A cell phone can
    easily do it.
    So we don't use proof of work. The obvious way of getting consensus is, well, let's just have a
    King. I mean, that's the easiest way to make everyone agree on something. We'll have a King
    and the King decides what we do. That's the simplest way to have agreement.
    So a lot of old systems that were designed, and many of the new systems, are based on a leader.
    In some systems, what you have, is one computer is the leader. Everybody sends it the
    transactions. It puts them in order. And then it tells everybody the official order that it decided on.
    That's how it works.
    The problem is with a leader, you can do DDoS attacks, Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
    What if there are a bunch of computers out on the internet that a hacker has taken control of, little
    tiny computers, like the computers in printers, and in web cameras, and in DVRs.
    And they've taken control of a whole bunch of these little computers. And they tell all the
    computers at once to flood the leader with packets. That would shut down the leader, which

ความคิดเห็น • 136

  • @StoicBarbarian
    @StoicBarbarian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Hashgraph should be #3 in Market Cap imo

  • @Meatislife
    @Meatislife 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Buying HBAR now is like buying AAPL in the 90s except much much bigger potential. What an incredible opportunity to be a part of something so big so early. This is the future of online transactions.

    • @tonyh1345
      @tonyh1345 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      HBAR & AGIX are my two moonshot positions

    • @GrandmaBetty1945
      @GrandmaBetty1945 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyh1345 Why AGIX? And while hashgraph may be the future, how high do you think the coin could go?

  • @katlehman1194
    @katlehman1194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Hashgraph is the next evolution of Blockchain - not jeopardizing security for Speed and scaling. Send this video to everyone you know and be their hero!!!

    • @musviqalizade1931
      @musviqalizade1931 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what do you think about FANTOM ?

    • @sharpestasset9615
      @sharpestasset9615 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@musviqalizade1931 shitcoin 😂

    • @tookymax
      @tookymax 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All my friends hate me now. They all lost at least 30% of what they invested.

  • @jerm184
    @jerm184 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    So if im correct, the corona runs on the gossip protocol 😂 when lock down

    • @sheepsus
      @sheepsus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      mostly😂

  • @DigitalAssetNews
    @DigitalAssetNews 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What did I just hear? I followed about half of what Leemon said. I know that was a simplified explanation but the question I have is how will this work as an investment vehicle?

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As an investor, you hold it long term and take advantage of growth potential + proxy staking (similar to dividends).

  • @abdoulazizhassana5167
    @abdoulazizhassana5167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you!

  • @simplyapleb9027
    @simplyapleb9027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is the future

  • @peanutnutter1
    @peanutnutter1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If a node receives info on the whole network, as Leemon mentioned "in 20 steps a million people know it, in 30 steps a billion people know it", then that seems like a lot of info going through the node. If the network operates at 100,000 transactions a second, then one node would receive 8.64 billion gossips in a day.

  • @efrainlopez8292
    @efrainlopez8292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how are users of this ledger protected? Is there a private key we receive when on the network? How do we prove a gossip isn’t false?

  • @bobgrime6983
    @bobgrime6983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Battleground for new alts will be Algorand Vs Hashgraph

    • @gurpchirp
      @gurpchirp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      apparently not XD

    • @lostmysteak9444
      @lostmysteak9444 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gurpchirp just wait ;)

  • @sharpestasset9615
    @sharpestasset9615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm in 👌

  • @dv3422
    @dv3422 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could be used for voting.

  • @PinballBob1
    @PinballBob1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I watched the whole video. I heard all the words. I don't understand any of it.

    • @davehooper6481
      @davehooper6481 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have one hell of a time understanding it and would be willing to bet you know more than I do but I do know that they have proven their security and speed that blockchain can't come close to.... ever. I know that if you watch more videos about it you will pick up enough info to be seriously impressed. It's best when you can find videos where sceptics are convinced and they have that 'oh shit' moment.

  • @sandymilne224
    @sandymilne224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All hail Hashgraph!!

  • @davidcisco4036
    @davidcisco4036 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I try to make transactions in Cash, and nobody knows.

    • @rattle_
      @rattle_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I use Monero, no one knows and I can do it from one corner of the world to another.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rattle_ -- So will you be able to do with Hedera Hashgraph anonymous accounts, the only difference is that Hedera going to do it way cheaper and transact within seconds.

    • @mtube620
      @mtube620 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      go check china, certain things and services can not accept cash. Cashless is coming, like it or not

  • @jaco_g6765
    @jaco_g6765 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Meet the new internet

  • @BlockIce84
    @BlockIce84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have heard about this two years ago, and I still don't understand that virtual voting.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree, it is very technical. To sum up, it means the nodes can vote on the order of transactions without having to reconnect to each nodes over and over just to get confirmations. This changes the process of taking several minutes to only a couple of seconds. It is also more resilient to network attacks.

  • @ensartaskin06
    @ensartaskin06 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like this coin

  • @HoneyBeeAlgo
    @HoneyBeeAlgo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    HBAR to $10

  • @SlayerFoxX
    @SlayerFoxX 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if i buy enough cheap computers which make up for 34% of the network? Since i dont need PoW or a strong computer i can just buy millions of $30 (or much cheaper) computers

    • @texlinton
      @texlinton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hedera PoS works by weighing the number of $hbar staked, not the number of nodes. You would need to own 34% of all $hbar, that will never be possible

  • @xrpeacemaker6437
    @xrpeacemaker6437 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The real question though: is privacy protected, and how?

    • @alexandernystrom1343
      @alexandernystrom1343 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It depends on how much information is recorded on the graph. So if all you need is a adress the only info visable will be your address , the amount you send, to who and when it happend.

  • @amosapostrophe1251
    @amosapostrophe1251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this screams xrp ?

  • @MrKasper0001
    @MrKasper0001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is not permissionless. Has decentralized consensus, but doesnt have decentralized ownership. It cant bring economic freedom if it has to bow to government regulation or theft through taxation.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh look guys, another scammer, trying to distribute his propaganda. Next time you'll see him posting about his scam coins. A shiller waiting to happen.
      If you are going to challenge a technology, bring actual facts to the table. Stop being part of the problem.

  • @tookymax
    @tookymax 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I understand the superiority of hashgraph to blockchain but why doesn't anyone invest in it? The price has been slipping from the time I invested Sep 16th till now Dec 4th. I don't understand. It would be nice if you could come on and explain why you think this is happening. I am about to lose faith, like many others already have. Please, Mr. Baird, we need you or Mr. Harmon to say something.

    • @icekurimu1688
      @icekurimu1688 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you are a weak hand, in five years u will be very sad to not holdings even a few hundred hbars

    • @adampodlinski1734
      @adampodlinski1734 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just have patience, we are gonna make it

    • @thezodiacsignz7309
      @thezodiacsignz7309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hope u didn't sell ...hashgraph is up rn

    • @tookymax
      @tookymax 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thezodiacsignz7309 No way, I've been buying since Sept 2019. How about you? I believe it should be more valuable than bitcoin. So if the market cap were only just equal, HBAR would price at $20,000. But I think it is even better than equal so I'm holding.

    • @thezodiacsignz7309
      @thezodiacsignz7309 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tookymax I bought a little ill buy more of it stays under 1$...and u never sell anything

  • @muhammadm4582
    @muhammadm4582 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    where is hashgraph now?

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In Testing. Only a fool would rush a product, even if the product is ready for release.

    • @ChitranjanBaghiofficial
      @ChitranjanBaghiofficial 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is a close source project, so you will only see corporates and other entities use it.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ChitranjanBaghiofficial -- Actually open review. And for the argument of corporations only being the one using it, that's where you are wrong. Let's take the technology of Paypal for example, it was revolutionary when it first came out and it allowed CONSUMER to transact between each other. Well, this is no different. Anything that landed in the hands of consumers started at the enterprise level. And I do mean ANYTHING! Even Bitcoin is currently sitting in the hands of companies holding down to mining pools. Or did you forget that part?
      The only difference is the way Hashgraph is design where they are single nodes with no more than a 100s or so on a single shard that does not use the governance network to come to consensus. In fact, they don't even know what runs on their network, that is the nature of their gossip about gossip protocol. Confused? Don't worry about it, tons of material out there you can check out.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Michael Bibow-Finucane -- Control by bankers? There you go with your crypto bro conspiracies. If you don't know how something works, ask, otherwise someone smarter or more educated is going to call you out on it.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Michael Bibow-Finucane -- Wow, just wow. You call me stupid when your argument is, "He works for the air force" when that was one of his job, he's not working there now. So should I call you the garbage man for the rest of your life if you end up taking that job as a kid?

  • @GregRickard
    @GregRickard 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    His hair looks like Pipeline.

  • @dgbmemes
    @dgbmemes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    DigiByte

  • @roberteastman1396
    @roberteastman1396 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    OK. So, the take-away is the profundity of 'time-stamp'. OK, look at child: time-stamp; hug spouse: time-stamp; pet dog: time-stamp. I could go on, but I don't want to.

  • @raptorraptor6344
    @raptorraptor6344 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤🧟‍♂️

  • @bigzv6948
    @bigzv6948 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Currently Hashgraph HBAR coin is at .03 cents. Whose here reading this in 2025 wish they bought more?

    • @foobazzler
      @foobazzler 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      no one

    • @-Nobody15650
      @-Nobody15650 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i got them on binance for 0.01

    • @jeffmyron3640
      @jeffmyron3640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BXPOLANCONY nice

  • @doc1546
    @doc1546 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Check it out..... Hbar market cap is rising but the price is still hovering around .35 - .40 how is this??? Well the simple answer is this is happening because whales (companies and individuals that bought them for pennies are cashing in) they are releasing their coins onto the market and keeping the price down. this shirt is going nowhere!!!

  • @geneeverett7855
    @geneeverett7855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    HashGraph is a centralized company
    It will not disrupt blockchain especially bitcoin in anyway.
    That said I have other issues with crypto’s actually working long term
    I’m only comparing HashGraph to blockchain here. And no the bitcoin community won’t leave blockchain for a centralized company

    • @davehooper6481
      @davehooper6481 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hide and watch

    • @postulation
      @postulation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Fortunately for HBar holders, the "bitcoin community" isn't the target.. mass market is!!

    • @davehooper6481
      @davehooper6481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@postulation bullseye.... This is really going to be a shock to them.

  • @mooredann69
    @mooredann69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    26 bitcoin pumpers disliked this video.

    • @geneeverett7855
      @geneeverett7855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m not a believer bitcoin will work long term
      So not a bitcoin dude at all here
      But HashGraph is totally centralized and even as a non bitcoin pumper I thumbs down this based on the clickbait title and HashGraph being garbage

    • @mooredann69
      @mooredann69 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@geneeverett7855 This is one of my big issues with Blockchain and open source code. Nothing stops a big player like Facebook to use these amazing ideas in a monetized fashion. Basically, ripple is a R&D team for big banks.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@geneeverett7855 -- Nothing about Hedera Hashgraph is centralized, but coming from the crypto bro space, I am not surprised that comment came from no actual facts.

  • @truffor1434
    @truffor1434 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    And what about the moment you burn let's say 10$ of energy to register cheaper transactions ?
    I've nothing against ledgers, but this...

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ... you don't understand. Hashgraph runs at around 100,000 trx a sec with the spec of a single GPU desktop computer with no more than approx. 100 nodes needed under a single shard. If you did the math, you would seen realize how very very cheap it is to do trx on Hashgraph. We are talking micro pennies.

    • @cooperkunz5604
      @cooperkunz5604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not sure where you got $10 from? Transaction fees on Hedera Hashgraph are currently less than a penny. It's a proof of stake network, so you don't have to operate expensive hardware. Even better, it has guaranteed finality and so nodes don't have to store full transaction history, but they obviously can if they would like (less memory requirements = cheaper nodes and fees)

  • @oranjelicht
    @oranjelicht 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Forget bitcoin. Hashgraph is the one

  • @ryantaylor761
    @ryantaylor761 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sounds like a copy of IOTA

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The only thing they have in common is that they are both DAGs, after that they are quite different.

    • @rattle_
      @rattle_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Similar, but quite different.

    • @ama-tu-an-ki
      @ama-tu-an-ki 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also, Baird started in 2012, IOTA and Baird both published algos in 2015. But the algos (and the basic logic behind how they achieve what they do) are different.

  • @londongabaldon9894
    @londongabaldon9894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    , hashgraph is patented you have to request in software development kit from them they're not open.... piss dirty dogs trying to sell his products

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You are confused my child. First off, development kit is part of any network, the patent has nothing to do with it. Second of all, no one trying to sell you anything. Their service is aimed at enterprise level, not a lowly consumer like yourself. But thanks for playing.

    • @cooperkunz5604
      @cooperkunz5604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your information is a bit incorrect.. Hedera Hashgraph is a public network and no license will be required to build on it at open access. See hedera.com

  • @MisterSpeedStacking
    @MisterSpeedStacking 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why does he look like that

  • @mikeledesma657
    @mikeledesma657 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Put this tech in bitcoin's side chain so that they can talk to each other.

    • @DJRYGAR1
      @DJRYGAR1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      what they want is to have monopoly - thats why hasgraph is patented. So hashgraph guys are looking for replacing one money monopoly with their own. No, thank you.
      Hey, Real Vision - you spent so many hours talking about evils of money monopolization and now you are helping other crooks to create new monopoly?

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DJRYGAR1 -- Ignorance doesn't suits you. Patent is to prevent forking. Besides, you assume they own control of the tech which they don't. Hedera Hashgraph is an LLC, not a company.

    • @DJRYGAR1
      @DJRYGAR1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Supremax67 LLC means 'limited liability company' so they are a company by definition. And why they want to prevent forking exactly?
      Patent is government approved monopoly. See, it is not me who's ignorant, it just you being naive.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DJRYGAR1 -- I am glad you looked it up. That's the first step you took out of preconceived notion. Swirlds is the only company who has any voting power and they'll own 2.56% of it. That's it, that's all. All council members will own no more than 2.56% and none of them can serve for longer than 6 years. It is the most decentralized governance to date. Compared to bitcoin where a single mining pool company owns more than 1/3 and there is no guidelines to remove them from that status. Bitcoin looks more like a Monopoly model than Hedera Hashgraph will ever be. But thanks for playing.

    • @davehooper6481
      @davehooper6481 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Supremax67 B O O M

  • @dwave5677
    @dwave5677 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That makes it too centralised

    • @geneeverett7855
      @geneeverett7855 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly
      It’s literally a centralized company

    • @postulation
      @postulation 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      He didn't even mention it's governance loool!

    • @cooperkunz5604
      @cooperkunz5604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not sure what you're referring to? The protocol itself is decentralized (no one computer, miner, or leader determines order) and anyone will eventually be able to run a node. The governance council is decentralized because members are term limited and have no interest to collude because their organization's market caps / revenues don't compare to their role on the council

    • @tradeorwait6815
      @tradeorwait6815 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Safe Network is the one to watch. Open source and great active community. It has much more to offer than hashgraph, and their consensus algorithm is even better than hashgraph. That one is permissionless and open source. Forget hashgraph

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tradeorwait6815 -- Sorry, are you referring to the tech who tried to steal the Hashgraph algorithm and his sitting 100 ranks lower than Hedera Hashgraph on the coinmarketcap? And now renamed to MaidSafeCoin because they had to rebrand twice to get rid of some bad publicity?

  • @sandeepozarde2820
    @sandeepozarde2820 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you mean by agreement? or consensus? You mean more like a democracy? because the consensus in the real world never works. Even voting doesn't work.

  • @coulombicdistortion1814
    @coulombicdistortion1814 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    34% Attack, yeah it's faster but that's a very steep network security penalty compared to traditional blockchains which require 51% of the network to be malicious in order to be attacked.

    • @zs1455
      @zs1455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      51% assumes there aren't any partitions in the network. EVERY SINGLE NETWORK HAS A 34% ATTACK, BAR NONE. Research the byzantine generals theorem before you spout misinformation

    • @cooperkunz5604
      @cooperkunz5604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@JS72 True! It's also 34% of the network's cryptocurrency stake, so it'd additionally be much harder to find that liquidity than standup hardware for a PoW system.

    • @vonmakeheat
      @vonmakeheat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s no such network that can survive a 34% attack , those who argue against this reality is simply misinformed.

  • @michael2275
    @michael2275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Stick with bitcoin.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You mean crap coin? The tech that has problem adapting to changes so much that the entire world is inspired to introduce something different? If Bitcoin was so good, you wouldn't see 2000+ teams trying to fix it.

    • @michael2275
      @michael2275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Supremax67 You have so much to learn young grass hopper.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Michael Bibow-Finucane -- They are no governments that has control of H-Bars. You obviously haven't been paying attention. It's like saying I am not willing to break the law, so I must be a police officer. Your statement started with zero sense.

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michael2275 -- If that's the case, then it is definitely not coming from you now is it? If you can't bring valid points to a debate, than your argument, for all intent purposes, is simply trolling. I have no problem calling out trolls like yourself.

    • @michael2275
      @michael2275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Supremax67 You're not worth my time.

  • @redpillcopinthephilippines9647
    @redpillcopinthephilippines9647 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Want to get rich? Short Tesla all the way to bankrupt. I started at $395. And it's on it' s way to target $50. Now watch how the Tesla Zombies attack me..............and yes I own Gold and Bitcoin too.

    • @jeffmyron3640
      @jeffmyron3640 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr. Smith this didn’t age well

    • @1Snouser
      @1Snouser 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oof

  • @londongabaldon9894
    @londongabaldon9894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm really let down by you real vision

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Of course you are, it flew right above your pay grade. But thanks for playing.

    • @londongabaldon9894
      @londongabaldon9894 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sketchhhhh I don't trust this guy! Get him away from me!

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@londongabaldon9894 -- You don't trust a guy that is smarter than you? You plan on going far in life?

    • @londongabaldon9894
      @londongabaldon9894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Supremax67 thank you for blessing me with knowledge. Fck hashgraph

    • @londongabaldon9894
      @londongabaldon9894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I bet it @sumprememax67 because u were born in 1967. Old head, I hope ur pensions go bust! Lol im young and my future doesn't come with pension socialsecurity or anything.. I have no future thanks to shit monetary policies! Yippy 4 me

  • @tradeorwait6815
    @tradeorwait6815 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, is hashgraph already permissionLESS?? Because that is what crypto and decentralized networks are about. Otherwise it is just a centralised money making token provided by a commercial company. The world doesn't need that.
    The Safe Network is the solution we all want and NEED, also for you hashgraph fans. It is superior to hashgraph in many ways, also their consensus mechanism is better. That one IS permissionless and open source. Community should be in control, not a $$ company. But I guess most hashgraph sheep have no idea what I am talking about 😂

    • @Supremax67
      @Supremax67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh they you are again! You know your comment didn't age well. MaidSafeCoin did not age well either. Please stop trying to scam people.