Dean Radin: The Global Consciousness Project

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • Laboratory scientist Dean Radin describes an experiment testing the relationship between mind and matter. In this experiment, random number generators are used to test whether collective human attention corresponds to a change in the physical environment.

ความคิดเห็น • 332

  • @CommunistCookie
    @CommunistCookie 9 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    It would be interesting to know what would happen if everyone in the world prayed for one flower to grow faster watching a live feed of it's progress

    • @carlgreen8608
      @carlgreen8608 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Oh man that'd be so easy to publicize.

    • @brianlink391
      @brianlink391 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      +Carl Green They have done something like that. Its been brought up in the documentary call "What the bleep do we know". They said - They have bought monks together to meditate in a room with positive thoughts and it deceased crime by some percentage. 10%? can't remember but it was a cool fact.

    • @tristanhoward9190
      @tristanhoward9190 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      CommunistCookie Prayer has been shown to be ineffective maybe a better experiment would be to try to make the flower grow.

    • @nicholaslindley1982
      @nicholaslindley1982 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Thinking that prayer is ineffective has been shown to be ineffective.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      CommunistCookie if we could gwt everyone in the world to concentrate on something productive and peaceful like that, we wouldnt even be in this mess

  • @sarahknight6627
    @sarahknight6627 6 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I swear the morning of 9/11/01 when I got on the school bus (I was in 8th grade at the time), I felt this eerie calmness in the air kinda like the calm before the storm. I just knew something would happen that day, maybe it was intuition, I don't know. But I didn't imagine it would be history in the making.

    • @alexriddles492
      @alexriddles492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have seen graphs of the EGG data from 9/11 and the change from random does start a few hours before the event.

    • @MeridianOfficial
      @MeridianOfficial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Appeal to emotion

  • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
    @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I’m furious that this project has been de-funded! This research is SO important and needs to continue. (This turned out to be wrong--see edits below)

    • @amyp.575
      @amyp.575 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What?!?!

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@amyp.575 I actually had a quick online chat with Dr. Radin and he told me that the project was defunded. I didn't get any more details than that unfortunately, but I am very disappointed. That was extremely important research in my opinion.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gematria effect news

    • @TheLisa-Al-Gaib
      @TheLisa-Al-Gaib 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Actually, I have a correction. The Global Consciousness Project is up and running with current reports available online.
      noosphere.princeton.edu/
      So I don’t know what happened exactly. I was live chatting with Dr Radin at his official site awhile back trying to get data from the 2016 election. I don’t know if I was tricked or if new funding appeared in the interim. Either way, I wanted to correct my statement and not spread incorrect information. Have a great day!!💕

  • @GeetarAdam
    @GeetarAdam 8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Dude is hacking the Matrix, real-life!

    • @kajallison8896
      @kajallison8896 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      GeetarAdam haha

    • @Felewin
      @Felewin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You would also like Randonautica

    • @monicamir
      @monicamir 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He's hacking human brains for his experiments.
      They want to know how mind is connected to brain.
      They discovered the particle Psy/J at CERN in 1976 and i guess it's not a particle at all.
      They defined a Algebra at CERN called Supersymmetry.
      There's a video made by CERN called Simmetry.
      Those people are crossbreeding between human and Rhesus monkeys.
      They want to become humans. They put lots of humans to work for them. Some not knowing , some unwillingly.
      Drugs are part of their business.
      Those people have no soul. They have a digital model of their minds called silhouette.
      The psychotronic generators are people they kill in their experiments.
      They are seek.
      Buhr is hell or fire in Sanskrit.
      They use the Sanskrit language in their researches.
      They made me have nightmares about 911 since 1978 or 1979. They have stolen my journal of this time.
      I had many nightmares with 911. It's synthetic dreams. They have produced those dreams.
      They produce events. Large scale events for their psychotronic generators.
      They are into noetics, occult , etc
      They are satanists.

    • @GeetarAdam
      @GeetarAdam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mônica Miranda Indeed. Modern day alchemists. But rather than investigating how to turn lead into gold, they want to know how matter begets mind. Of course, they’ve got it bass-ackwards. Matter proceeds from mind. All matter in the universe was willed into existence by the mind of Yahweh.

  • @jayumble8390
    @jayumble8390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is fantastic, thank you!!! There is a collective consciousness that is indeed totally real and these REG's prove it...period. We just need to keep studying this. Once this concept is accepted around the world, the responsibility is on us, as a collective people, to make the difference. This is so deep and points to a different reality for generations to come.

  • @fremmed1
    @fremmed1 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Dewillough This raises the question: Does our thoughts matter or are we just matter....? Yes, our bodies are matter, but thoughts decides if we live in love or fear. This (and many other) experiences proves that our attitude/thoughts matter in a unified way. Witch means that we should care about what we do cause what we do to another we also do to ourself. Its about responsibility to create a more loving world.

  • @Paddyllfixit
    @Paddyllfixit 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what are you talking about? Did you watch the same video? There is absolutely no data-dredging, the results speak for itself. The "randomness" becomes coherent during world events with peoples attention being focused. It is what it is! There is no misinterpretation other than perhaps some other cause being responsible for the change in the RNGs which is highly unlikely as no other factors are involved. Did you not hear Dean state that the odds against it being chance are 1000000/1?

  • @KnowL-oo5po
    @KnowL-oo5po ปีที่แล้ว +1

    give this man all the resources he needs

  • @robertwalker3500
    @robertwalker3500 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have written a book called Remember the Rainbow: An Instinctive Sense for Grasping the nature of things. In the book, I write about one of my experiences that caused me to raised the very same questions with regard to "intention and attention." I found myself having the ability to manifest objects into existence. To hear Dean Radin speak to this question via scientific experimentation tells me he is far more superior, intellectually, than he himself may realize. While I have been gifted in knowing, that is, by means of time travel, he has the ability to comprehend scientific data through experimentation. What he doesn't know is that his desire for discovering answers to his most puzzling question are found in the complexities of time travel. I'm currently writing a second edition that will bring my perspective, a new light, of understanding of how consciousness works in the paradigm of time to answer some of these kinds of questions [04/20/2014].

  • @davidcraigthor
    @davidcraigthor 10 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    For maximum benefit, it is essential for those manipulating things (all of us), to be happy. Happiness is a crucial factor in determining whether those changes are beneficial or detrimental. For someone with a lot of "influence" torturing & tormenting them could mean disaster for everyone.

    • @majji8604
      @majji8604 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fuck trump though

    • @tiddlecast
      @tiddlecast 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I love that idea. I think he alluded that the phenomenon’s causation is still under investigation.

  • @bilbobaggins3333
    @bilbobaggins3333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thoroughly enjoyed listening in on this discussion. On the part of the poster of this content there are far too many advertisements embedded. There were between 10 &15 planted into this presentation. It’s disruptive and impedes the absorption of the content.

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm not speaking of the GCP specifically, but rather psi research in general, specifically the Ganzfeld. You can test numerous hypotheses at once and see which one works. If the same hypothesis is found to fit the data across the board, that hypothesis might be justified. If we claim that anomalous communication occurs (i.e. mind to mind communication), finding supporting data that fits the concept and not others (i.e. sensory leakage, etc), we can presume AC is a reasonable explanation.

  • @tiddlecast
    @tiddlecast 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Here we are with this magnificent power and we’re praying for 1’s and 0’s 😅😉

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fair enough; I will agree with that. The larger effects for what we're talking about are often more difficult to demonstrate adequately though.
    If even one of the many poltergeist cases, for example, is a genuine example of large scale psi at work, then it's been demonstrated; I tend to think that there are many genuine cases of notable phenomena occurring that we can't explain. Thanks for the response!

  • @amyleigh7660
    @amyleigh7660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Six days before 911, I was burdened with excruciating sensations of utter doom. These feelings would grab me unexpectedly and throughout these days, I’d told a total of 7 people - neighbors, friends and family about it. No matter how hard I tried, I could not pinpoint it. Late at night, on September 10th, 2001, it all disappeared. And of course the next day, horror. I didn’t understand until that moment and at the time, I was an extreme skeptic.
    After that, no more.

    • @WHDRWN
      @WHDRWN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      emotion grab

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 14 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This work needs to be taken seriously by the world and academia! At least decades have been spent working on this research. Double blind experiments reveal that this is fact.

  • @qorilla
    @qorilla 10 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I'm manipulating matter right now with my mind. I'm pulling my finger muscles by just thinking of moving them with my mind.

    • @harishmohan1
      @harishmohan1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me too ☺

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now try manipulating matter outside of your body with just your mind.

  • @temporaryexistence1974
    @temporaryexistence1974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On the day of 9/11 I was 15 and I am from central Europe. I came back from school that day and suddenly a thought came to my mind. Turn on CNN, maybe there is some breaking news. So I did and CNN was like, there was an accident and a plane just crashed into WTC. Man, I watched it all and it changed my life. A truthseeker was born.

    • @negus3530
      @negus3530 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is no CNN in central europe

    • @temporaryexistence1974
      @temporaryexistence1974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      w@@negus3530 yes, as well as no flush toilets, you backwater retard.

  • @elfman5150
    @elfman5150 15 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow this is extremely interesting stuff! I'll be sure to look it up; thanks for your suggestion! It is amazing how different "true" reality (though I suppose I must use the word "true" very loosely) is from what the majority of people think it to be. And from what you have said, regarding prerecorded data, how consciousness can effect past events and data possibly. Truly fascinating stuff - better than science fiction, because it is real!

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reality is what's around you. There's no evidence otherwise. This is all confirmation bias garbage

  • @jeremybronson7
    @jeremybronson7 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is very exciting... Is it me or Does anyoneelse think that there may be a relation between the results of testing being done at LHC in Switzerland and Global Conciousness Project..
    1- Some particles may travel faster than light..
    2- Information may travel faster than light..
    3- Some events may be foreseen before it happen..
    4- Is the cause and effect principle becoming history-- at a certain level??
    These i would love to know... :))

  • @redbeakman
    @redbeakman 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The Force.

  • @paulflute
    @paulflute 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    he didn't mention the experimenter effect..

  • @laelwerner5441
    @laelwerner5441 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any scientific papers on this?

  • @PinballDave72
    @PinballDave72 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A noticeable byproduct of personal battles between Love of Life vs. Fear of Change, or something to that effect. :-) ☆ ♡

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @MaBu888 What do you mean 'if the tapes have 5d'? The tapes are just ordinary tapes, like any other except that the data on them is unobserved. It has recorded data generated by the RNG but in the absence of any observer. The data exists in a state of quantum indeterminacy until it is collapsed by an observer. What would be acceptable to you as determining that the tapes 'have 5d'?

  • @CW4RUNNER
    @CW4RUNNER 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is very much like 'the secret'. Think positive and you'll be rewarded with great things.

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @MaBu888 Can we establish what you mean by the 5th dimension? The 4th dimension is time, of course (the other three being the spatial dimensions of the everyday world). This is standard physics. Are you postulating a 5th dimension which is a realm of possibilities?

  • @AstroSquid
    @AstroSquid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    will Benford's law help an individual know if they are being honest in their projection on the random numbers?

  • @terrapin52
    @terrapin52 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a good example of academics falsely trying to find cause and effect relationships where they don't exist. So many countless doctoral theses written for the same reason never advance human knowledge because they are "reaching" for something that isn't there. If he'd publish his findings, I'm sure you'd find an error coefficient which is perfectly plausible and could not be attributed to anything other than normal variance.

  • @EchadLevShtim
    @EchadLevShtim 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wouldnt sum up Dean Radins career on RNG alone, he's done a few doozies. But nothing was more profound than Time Reversed Human Experience in Precognitive studies, where EEG brainscans monitor brainwave function during response of emotional stimuli, This test has been practiced at campuses globally as scaring & arousing patients shows significant brain activity. RNG is no more validating than the old card guessing trials. For the simple reason of synchronicity & lack of stimuli.

  • @ff-1971
    @ff-1971 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it possible to be every conscious being? To experience all lives linearly but at the same time simultaneously and outside of time

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Listen to 2:33 - 3:16 1000x !!!! IF YOU GET IT CONGRATS!!

  • @12thDecember
    @12thDecember 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "What is it with people?"

    Well, what it is, there are those who cannot extend their perception beyond the boundaries of their own experience.
    Remarkable that the RNGs did not display randomness *before* the actual physical event of 9-11, as if there were a prescient mass consciousness which anticipated that something of great import was about to occur.
    Odd coincidence that I'm watching a video which discusses 9-11. Those are 2 of the numbers I chose for the lottery earlier today.

  • @derekfish7768
    @derekfish7768 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This absolutely fascinating!

  • @somuchinfo
    @somuchinfo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Before 9 11, during and after... how could something that runs randomly change before anyone is even aware that the event is about to happen? This suggests that something or someone else was focusing in on the event before it actually began, not random human beings but something else had turned its energy toward that specific event and possibly others.

    • @spaceedementia
      @spaceedementia 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      joseph wall while i do believe 9/11 was a definite inside job, i think this precognition could be achieved by something like the inertia of a cosmic event. This event changed everything in our realm. It had to have some _major_ things (shifts in consciousness) leading up to it... whether 19 hijackers with box cutters carried it out or not

    • @reneeboley
      @reneeboley 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because our hearts have been shown to know when something bad is going to happen before it happens. Time is man created.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Vernonpaddy Regardless if they are negligible or not is beside the point. They are there. The unexplained parts of science can be ignores? Science doesn't ignore what it can not explain. It charges at the things it cannot explain. Whether there is practical applications are not are beside the point. Science is the search for knowledge.

  • @bowenstudios
    @bowenstudios 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @1234stives I do know a bit about it. Quantum physics in no way supports such a claim. I'm assuming you're referring to entanglement - in which two particles can be 'contected' to each other althought they may be physcially far from each other. When entangled one of the particles can effect the other partical instantly over a large distance. ONLY entangled particles effect each other in such a way. NOT all particles are entangled, in fact almost none are. (continued...)

  • @anarelle
    @anarelle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is definitely what Jacobo Grinberg was talking about with his "lattice" and syntergic theory.

  • @DrewDienno
    @DrewDienno 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder if the scientists who ran the 1950s acid studies on those housewives were trying to learn about this global consciousness thing, seeing if the drug effects were linked to getting in touch with the universal community, or if the two had nothing to do with each other.

  • @Markisagoodboy
    @Markisagoodboy 16 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When someone is reported missing on the television news, or there is a war, perhaps the news should adopt a biased approach now and present it in such as way that the viewers are encouraged to send love and safety to the victims - instead of have everyone think the worst and give it more negative attention.

  • @avidclip
    @avidclip 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Two notable quotes from the brilliant German physicist, Max Planck, relevant to the topic and to some of the comments: 1. "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." 2. "Science advances one funeral at a time." This latter quote has proven itself true way too many times., and I think will do so in Radin's case too.

  • @revolutiongames2004
    @revolutiongames2004 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how does one determine whether randomness goes down?
    i ask because, like scientists should, i would like to repeat the experiment. how does one define a decrease in randomness?

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly why its a garbage study.
      Randomness is a lack of pattern. So if you see more patterns, you can reasonably claim there is less randomness. But if you look for more patterns, you will see more patterns. (The #1 job of the human mind is to recognize the patterns it wants to see). This is all obviously confirmation bias. But if you wanted to recreate it, look for patterns in the numbers. Eg 0000 0000 0000 0000 is less random than 1001 1100 1010 0010

  • @djdavidj5531
    @djdavidj5531 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would be interesting so to see the same experiments done using quantum computers as "random" number generators. I wonder if the entanglement factor is changed...

  • @Mrpjm200
    @Mrpjm200 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @phookadude - You need to check out the earlier work that was done at Princeton Uni. They performed studies on individual volunteers who's attention was focussed on an REG (e.g. they were trying to consciously influence the outcome). This later research using EGGs is like a scaled up version of the earlier research.

  • @metaRising
    @metaRising 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've just posted a vido response to this video that people interested in the GCP may find interesting. -thanks

  • @brianlink391
    @brianlink391 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love it, thanks. Great video!

  • @Dewillo344
    @Dewillo344 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This theory appears ridiculous yet plausible and understandable. However, what are the practical implications of a global consciousness interconnected with all of global matter? I can't think of any.

  • @nzdrone
    @nzdrone 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this is the secret of professional gamblers. Have you ever wondered how professional gamblers seem to keep winning more than they lose while everybody else loses more than they win? I think it's because they do it all the time, day after day. After a while the constant attention and intention to winning starts to favor the odds to their advantage.

  • @seyoumeye
    @seyoumeye 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about before the death of Michael Jackson? Has any mental coherence affected randomness?

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not at all. this means that each time that there is a event that have consequences on a large scale for humans, we notice that random generators have a peak of unrandomness that starts a few hours/days before the event, and ends a few hours/days after.
    From that, studies have to be done to begin to understand this phenomenon : for now we don't know much about what's "really" happening.

  • @theconsciousmovement9669
    @theconsciousmovement9669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sorry for sealing your views, I had to re-post this

  • @tjmac7
    @tjmac7 16 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Electronic number generators. Maybe the link is between consciousness and electronics. Im sure the prana and chi proponents would love this angle.

  • @Xerock
    @Xerock 15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    50 year period of study? Oh really? Considering that he's only 57 yrs old, that would be quite a feat.
    I hold all scientists to the same level of criteria. Those, like Radin, who who go as far as he has off the deep end of rational science earn the title crackpot on their own.

  • @Wstreak91
    @Wstreak91 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "The system that should be behaving randomly are no more behaving random"; if this doesn't inspirs you to know more about YOU I do not know what will!

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm trying so hard to look for the link between the current global covid pandemic and this global consciousness project but there's nothing anywhere. Even in their website Jeez. if you find anything hit me upz. People have forgotten this and they're caught up in fear now LOL.

    • @liberationwasalie2982
      @liberationwasalie2982 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davemwangi05 are you alive

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@liberationwasalie2982 I've just been taken to a morgue, they've labelled me a covid death.

  • @hibarahman7593
    @hibarahman7593 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What quantifies orderedness in the RNG?? Like is there a pattern 0000011111, 01010101??

  • @Fangornmmc
    @Fangornmmc 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Fangornmmc
    ups. The quantum mechanical effect was also scientific. Almost forgot that.

  • @decepticonsofnwo
    @decepticonsofnwo 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Considering consciousness is not a physical phenomenon it makes it difficult to measure with scientific instruments but doesn't entirely make it bad science

  • @Candyliz2003
    @Candyliz2003 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @vman456
    1. What are they (studies) and where can they be found?
    2. Being a skeptic has nothing to do with bigotry or arrogance.
    3. Didn't he fail with James Randi? Or did he not accept the challenge (like all but one psychic)?

  • @RayneMa
    @RayneMa ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes there is a direct link between consciousness and matter around you. But you will only notice it if you have extremely high consciousness at the time but you will only be the one that experiences it as no one else will be there ready to measure your consciousness when it is being experienced. I do not think you can directly measure it. But it is there. I will be interested in the results that happen a day before the global tsunamis in 2004.

  • @messianicrogue
    @messianicrogue 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Obviously there is a world wide psychic connection, that just happens to tap into TV events simultaneously around the world, hours before events happen, it is so obvious.
    'Events would occur that we couldn't predict' But you should be able to predict some form of major event hours before now this gear is kicking off.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and your response is to call him "crack pot" so now you're even. Insults doesn't deal with claims either way. My question to you: is what if his data is correct? Because he doesn't do a full presentation in an interview does not mean it is flawed. Lets just saw this man did the work, got the results, and is being honest about them. Can you be objective for a moment?

  • @Xerock
    @Xerock 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:00 - 1:35 - After loads of data wishing for heads and tails works. None of this data is shown.
    1:36 - 2:31 - Who did these tests of randomness? Where were they held? Where is the data?
    2:32 - 3:51 - "We can infer that there is mental coherence" Translation: there is no measurable link between wishing and manipulation of data.
    3:52 - 5:56 - "significant deviation towards order" Translation: Nothing we can measure beyond common, everyday apophenia.

  • @Candyliz2003
    @Candyliz2003 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Mrpjm200
    Then WHERE IS IT?

  • @knightxc
    @knightxc 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    There have been plenty of other tests that seem to support some inter-connectedness bewtween everything, not a god, just a connection. The double slit experiment, entanglement theory, and chaos theory all seem to suggest a higher conscious or at least suggests that there is some hidden reality that we cannot observe. Yes, maybe this test has a variable unaccounted for but that does not mean we should discard the theory all together.

  • @stephenm6137
    @stephenm6137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mind blowing literally.

  • @piperogusano
    @piperogusano 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @decepticonsofnwo its a physical phenomenon....of course, and biological

  • @SAlexanderHardison
    @SAlexanderHardison 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @nemirn Doubtfully. The evidence for these things, at least in small effects, is undeniable -at least by any honest skeptic. We don't know what is going on -but we know that something very strange is.

  • @bowenstudios
    @bowenstudios 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @bunny153649. Yes, I understand the fundamentals of quantum entanglement. (Please see my other comments on this page). This 'phenomena' is nothing like quantum entanglement which ONLY works on the quantum level - human brains are large and therefore cannot be entangled with a random number generator. But even if our minds 'could' be entangled WHY would they be entangled with random number generators?! It makes no sense. It

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Candyliz2003 How would you know the details of the experiments from a 10min interview clip? You may be psychic or maybe you are a remote viewer. You seem to know things that no one could know from the information presented here. Wow. A real life remote viewer!

  • @gschnuuget
    @gschnuuget 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ok. Why not extending the experiment, using all the million computers of volunteers to generate more random data.
    Why not feeding back the random values on a website so that everybody can see the next arriving drama ?

    • @jutjubow
      @jutjubow 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You won't see what exactly it will be though.

  • @Nowitzki25
    @Nowitzki25 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    collective consciousness is like sunyata in Buddhism which means emptiness; or for better words emptiness of consciousness. Because Buddha taught that we are all one in a void state/place. "Emptiness is form and form is emptiness" Not a Buddhist just found it interesting.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting that 2 hours before 911 the random generators stopped running randomly. The cause could not be "collective mind" because the event had not happened yet. Something else was affecting the generators...

  • @jimeaglesmith
    @jimeaglesmith 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    agreed. For the moment anyhow! ;)

  • @Donnnny2010
    @Donnnny2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Entrainement of global conciousness (Hive) in motion

  • @tristanhoward9190
    @tristanhoward9190 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Try the retropsychokinesesexperiements.

  • @coolduderyan07
    @coolduderyan07 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I've gathered that we have 0's and 1's peaking in times of collective consciousness.
    So this, hypothetically, could be measuring a force that bridges our minds in an interconnected consciousness. So, we would all be one mind, separated by different physical realities. So, it's almost like friends sitting in a car. Kickin in the front seat. Sittin in the back seat. Gotta make my mind up... WHICH SEAT SHOULD I TAKE?!
    ITS FRIDAY, FRIDAY

  • @BrunoCoelho
    @BrunoCoelho 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Controlling a coin with the mind? Have we been able to falsify this, yet or how is this supported by the scientific method?

    • @commodoor646
      @commodoor646 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bruno Coelho I'd be interested to know how often their random number generators produce non-randomn data sets in the absence of what they refer to as global consciousness *_attending_* events. In other words, if the spikes in non-random data occur in the absence of global events, maybe these spikes can be explained by pure chance.

  • @cricketjam
    @cricketjam 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Vernonpaddy right on.

  • @ChiefBiggM
    @ChiefBiggM 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @LucasI3434 Well i guess that the generators started to show the same numbers more often, or something like that. Maybe i should read this man's books. Brilliant stuff!

  • @aaronjennings8385
    @aaronjennings8385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    911 was prophesied to occur. not random, prophesied. .
    rev17:18And this woman you saw in your vision represents the great city that rules over the kings of the world.”
    the global consciousness may just be called God

  • @huni54
    @huni54 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    we could also try a youtube experiment with this.. since a lot of people watched it we could try to focus real hard on a thought and see if the random number generator is disturbed by it or not.

    • @Nasko86
      @Nasko86 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      For this you need a big mass of people to pay attention to it. Since only 77 000 people saw this.
      How big is the number you think of the people actually interested in this video/information. Since it is from 2008. If you are interested in the subject or at least openhanded as I pretend to be you could tap by accident on it.
      Or maybe people don't care. Couse they are scared, that if we have missed this, there could be so much more?
      I am not critical. I just say, that the problem is not technology, the problem are we. Of course we can. But we just don't! People don't want to know. Some of was do. But here we are. 77 000 peope + some maybe 100 000 who have not found this video yet. Now who is going to organize them? For free, cause anything else would be appearing the same as all this "I will tell you a secret which will make you endlessly happy, rich, or sexy, only for 99$ for a cd, or book".
      I would be happy to find out a way to change that. How to make people curious ? How to make them want to know?
      We need an Idea here. Big bang kind of Idea.

  • @amisfitpuivk
    @amisfitpuivk 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is weird. I willed a coin to turn heads and resulted in a constant +1 to +4 heads for a bunch of flips. I switched to tails, and had streaks of 4 and 5 tails flips, and once 10 tails in a row. Call it luck, but thats a .01% chance to get tails 10 times in a row :O

    • @sunofx4142
      @sunofx4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its confirmation bias. If the experiment had failed, you wouldn't be posting about it, ie you wouldn't take note. You only take note of the times it works. This makes you think your hypothesis is true. When in reality, its confirmation bias

  • @archdeaconj
    @archdeaconj 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, it's truly mindblowing. I got so into it I got the original papers out to the library. I'm still reading up on it. The implications are that the data is not on the tape until it is observed, that is to say until the quantum indeterminacy is collapsed by the observer (of course, once it is collapsed, you cannot change it). Matter would seem to be a construct of consciousnes, not objectively real. QM vindicates (more or less) Kant as well as Buddhism and much oriental philosophy.

    • @adbrooks95
      @adbrooks95 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like what happens in the double slit?

  • @galacticswan
    @galacticswan 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Or maybe not so strange. Maybe it is our conception of separation witch is strange, being just a usefull tool to concieve reallity at a certain level, but quiet inadequat to concive it at other levels.
    A pair of binoculars, a telescope, a magnifying glass, a microscope, different subjects, different tools.

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @ikvsabre This is an interview cut into a 10min clip. You want details? And how would you know he has not submitted his work for peer review from this clip? Search Dean Radin speaks at google here on youtube or on my page. You will find names, places, and all the other information you need. Now the question is are you brave enough to leave your bias at the door and deal wit the data honestly? Probably not. You skeptics are really like the religious. I've done this dance many times.

  • @bxbank
    @bxbank 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This just sounds like it is proving where attention is being directed, not before it happened. Just showing when it is happening in real time. There is no perception being proved here.

  • @cricketjam
    @cricketjam 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @jamesarongray right on.

  • @Wretbornify
    @Wretbornify 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @nemirn You've just shown that Science is a belief-system just as strong as religion.

  • @andresperovich9601
    @andresperovich9601 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You know Dean, you can't really flip a bit in a pseudorandom generator; besides, the sequence isn't really truly random. Maybe, what's going on here is your peeking into the future? Impossible? -- contemplate the events of Chicago Flight and David Booths nightmares!

  • @greenelf12
    @greenelf12 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @decepticonsofnwo yay, thankyou!

  • @DoctorTachyon
    @DoctorTachyon 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @tttapmmman right you are tap man.

  • @janeeissa9539
    @janeeissa9539 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Randonautica!

  • @MrNilsenone
    @MrNilsenone 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah totally

  • @yehnahyeh
    @yehnahyeh 16 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow

  • @elfman5150
    @elfman5150 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Read up on Quantum Mechanics, and m-theory...I believe you will find the answer there.

  • @dennistucker1153
    @dennistucker1153 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing stuff.

  • @ROForeverMan
    @ROForeverMan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For anyone interested in consciousness see my papers like How Self-Reference Builds the World author Cosmin Visan.

  • @darkaether2798
    @darkaether2798 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is even weirder than the double slit experiment

  • @beastyshout
    @beastyshout 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ITS AT 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @zadeh79
    @zadeh79 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's unfortunate that Radin's claim gets thrown into the Trolls and Boogeyman basket. I've talked to people about the GCP, and unexpectedly, their seems to be quite a bit of confusion and difficulty in understanding all of it.