No. His argument is concerning culture and how every American breaks the law due to culture, such as the flow of traffic. That's a good argument. The culture of this person's school contributes to the defendant's behavior. Memes like the ones you wrote ('we live in a society') are hollow simplistic mocking misrepresentations of substantive issues and explanations. I know it's easy to be a keyboard attorney and joke, but it's misleading when the joke exists simply to entice a laugh rather than having any semblance of satire that contributes to a larger point. No closing argument can be articulated in one sentence like the one you made. I'm not "triggered" (another overused meme). I'm just explaining the importance of why you are wrong. The lawyer did a fine job. If any American here begrudges this attorney, then write and call your Congressmembers and pressure them to amend the 6th Amendment of our Constitution. But that amendment will never be amended democratically because the right to legal representation is a core component of a strive towards freedom and democracy. Note that I said a "strive towards" democracy. The issue of whether the United States is actually a pure and legitimate democracy is grounds for another discussion. 6th Amendment: read it. The Constitution: read it. It's very short. You can get through the whole thing in 10 minutes. B
Btw, from the culture (context) of this comment section, I can tell that your upvotes stem from a mockery and ignorance of due process, not just from humor. That's why I replied. You're right: "we do live in a society" is a part of the argument, but you've eliminated the context of culture. To the reactionaries: I am "chill". Writing is not a burden to me nor does it indicate anger. Writing is actually 1/3 of my career. Reading and speaking are the other 2/3s.
Let me fill you in. These attorneys have been preparing for months for these kinds of high-stake trials. He's probably have investigated all of the jurors' background. Every "um...ah...what's that word...?" is calculated to garner jury's attention/sympathy. The defense counsel is presenting himself as someone like a juror: a 55+ year old, likely retiree, who doesn't understand college kids. He's asking the juror to put themselves in the shoes of a college kid to understand his action. This is honestly the most well-prepared argument I have ever heard. It's not the attorney's job to look like the smartest guy in the room; his job is to get the jury to his side. I have seen the best attorneys dressing down, looking folksy, etc., to get jurors to empathize with his clients.
Jacob Stylus are you a trial lawyer I think not.I went to siu school of law for 5 years and I got my b degree in us history, and if your wondering my class rank I came out to 4th in my class and I got my bar license if your wondering
@@blakemichaelis2214 1. What gives you the indication that he's not a trial lawyer? 2. Noone was "wondering" your class rank and school (irrelevant information) 3. Law school is only 3 years
Dunno why you guys are hating. What else was he supposed to do? There was physical video evidence of his client’s actions. All he can do in that situation is to manipulate their emotions to minimize his client’s sentence.
Yeh thats why the law system is such a complicated mess, especially the Lawyering buisness they get promotions and is able to advance they're carreers the more cases theyve one, this systems not promoting truth and justice its who ever has the best lawyer and the losing lawyer gets a potential downgrade if the more cases he lose, what if the person just keeps getting clients that has large amounts of evidence weighing on against them?
I dont think that's quite right, im not sure about Tennessee but in most jurisdictions the jury ascertains an accused's guilt. If the defendant is found guilty he is remanded in custody and there is a separate hearing for sentencing further down the track where the judge gives out a sentence commensurate with precedent and the facts/seriousness of the crime
This man is just doing his job. He doesn't try to actually DEFEND his client. He KNOWS that his client did it. And he's not trying to give his client a reason for a mistrial.Hes not talking about evidence or the credibility of the victim. Hes talking out of his ass and he knows it😂😂😂
His just there for the money,that's why it's better to represent yourself.Don't believe in the bullshit that you need a degree to be a lawyer.All you need is to study and understand the law,understand the judicial process, learn how to present and argue your case by formulating good defence strategies.Even when the state presents evidence against your actions you can scrutinize every detail and how it was obtain.Question,critique and scrutinize the evidence,the witnesses,even the investigators of the case.
Santo Paraiso it’s tough to do that, and the fact is that most people who think they can just don’t know enough to know they probably shouldn’t - myself included. Try reading about the Dunning-Kruger effect - it’s pretty fascinating.
@@santoparaiso4129 Well its not so easy to first learn how to practice law amd then find all the evidence you need to defend yourself in the time an educated lawyer would use just to build the case.
@Hot Water Everyone deserve and should have a right to a lawyer. Youre conpletely innocent UNTIL found guilty. So he didnt defend a guilty man, he defended an innocent man that probably was found guilty after the trial.
Honestly if you think about the traffic analogy it honestly helped boost his argument. Yeah he went on a tangent of course but looking through the eyes of the lawyer, judge, and the jury. And also getting the idea around the case it honestly helped. You just have to think about it from a “there’s a video of what you did, were doing, and the victim. They know you did it but how can we slant their emotions” point of view.
Okay, I have read too many comments from the arm-chair attorneys here to just not say anything. Let me fill you in. Attorneys like him have been preparing for months for these kinds of high-stake trials. There's videotape of his client committing wrongdoing, so the facts are undeniable that his client did it; he's just trying to mitigate the sentencing. To do that, he probably has investigated all of the jurors' background. Every "um...ah...what's that word...?" is calculated, rehearsed, practiced to garner juror's attention/sympathy. If you have been on jury duty, you know that most jurors are older, likely retirees. The defense counsel is presenting himself as someone like those jurors: a 55+ year old, likely retiree, who doesn't understand college kids. He's asking the juror to put themselves in the shoes of a college kid to understand his action. This is honestly the most well-prepared argument I have ever heard. It's not the attorney's job to look like the smartest guy in the room; his job is to get the jury to his side. I have seen the best attorneys dressing down, looking folksy, wearing mismatched shoes etc., to get jurors to empathize with his clients.
I agree with you, if this was a medical situation, it was like a doctor who tried one last therapy he/she could try to lessen the pain on a patient that is diagnosed with terminal stage cancer.
Can someone please remove the protective clear plastic covering on the back of the judge's monitor? That is supposed to be removed when it is taken out of the box. I'm trying to concentrate on what he is saying. Thank you.
"I must be saying the right things, because I keep getting objected". - Um no, it's cos you're making bad arguments and sound like you prepared 15 minutes ago.
Yes, rape is around us everyday. That still does not mean it is right, or should be normalized. Man's talkin out his ass 🤷♀️ Did the rapist ever go to jail?
@@user-pp6gx2rk8t people like you think youre safe but can you guarantee your children, grandchildren will never make a terrible mistake and end up in there? the point of the justice system isnt to rehabilitate and reintegrate, like it should be, but to punish everyone within it, good or bad, accidental or deliberate wrongdoing. prison breeds criminals right now because what do you think would happen if suddenly, 90% of inmates, who are non-violent, were just put under house-arrest? a total industry collapse. that cant be allowed to happen now, can it? since when is the government been about downsizing? by the way, people a person in a cage is an evil act, no matter what moral gymnastics you do to justify it. and plenty of innocent people have rotted in there for decades.
If you have video evidence against you and dna evidence I'm sure no 10000 lawyer can save you. So before you talk 💩 think about what you say before you type
For all of those who think this guy is talking out of his ass, he isn't. The first piece about looking through it from the lens of a 51 year old vs the accused is telling the jury that they need to get into the perspective of the accused, not their own perspective. This is called subjective mens rea. For a guilty conviction the prosecutor needs to prove this mental element beyond a reasonable doubt. But this has to be from the accused's perspective, that he had the intention to commit w.e. he committed - from the sounds of it a sexual assault. The lawyer than ended with the accused drinking excessively. This is pointing to the defense of incapacity, if the accused drank to the point where he couldn't even remember what he did; how can the prosecution be sure he had the intention to commit his crime? The answer is they shouldn't be able to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt. Note, I am a law student not from America but the common law system is similar. Jurisdiction can have different exceptions for sexual assaults with the burden of proofs. The delivery I admit was hilarious, but if you had the back drop of what he is trying to do; it's not that bad.
I don’t know if this is possible but my mom died from a very very bad flesh eating disease and it came out of nowhere eight months before all this came down to see 19 can I sue because I know it was from that they kept it from us
This is embarrassingly cringy, I feel so bad 😂 he was not prepared at all 💀 whoever he is “defending” is over there crying knowing he bout to go to jail😩
The worst part is he actually was kind of on to something 💀 had he presented this case better, the kid probably could have gotten off the hook with a slap on the wrist smh
Did you know the police don't even have to do an investigation on particular crimes all they need is someone to point their finger at the party they suspect is guilty
he’s doing his job chill. Being a lawyer who deals with serious crimes aren’t always supporting justice. Lawyers aren’t about justice. don’t expect them to be.
@@user-pp6gx2rk8tso to defend a rape case that your defendant did, caught on camera, what is the best argument for it? I want to know, since you seemed like a capable person
When I came into this office for the first time I was amazed by how nice everyone was. They all went out of their way to greet me and make me feel comfortable. I knew at Harris, I always had someone in my cornir fighting for me. I would recommend this firm to anyone because of how professional they were and how easy they made my experience.
If he addressed a British jury like this I think the judge would probably have picked up a copy of Blackstones and lobbed it in his general direction!......lol.....very tough to watch. Sympathy for the jury who had to endure the whole trial.
The last minute would have been a more plausible argument to focus on. Being so drunk that Corey possibly couldn’t have been functional enough to cause intent.
@@georgecarrera18 thing is I belief that the law and facts were stacked against the defendant anyway and the atorney knew that. So he tried every angle which may give the jury some reason to be mercyful. Beeing it the surounding culture, the media glorifying violence or alcohol, anything that makes his client less accountable for his actions helps if you cannot argue law or facts.
@@alberich3099 valid point but could had use possibly the excusal defense then In conjunction with how modern media glorifies sex disrespect of woman and speaking of any possible abuse defendent may sustain or mental health I feel could've done better
Always use your rights. Especially when being questioned. Plea the fifth. Request the discover, look at the evidence against you. In some states you can waive your speedy trial like Oregon. this time can be used to have a privet investigator help with getting statements from victim. Also, expert witness, corrector witness, a reliability of witness against you or for you. Some witness will dip out. Can state in court to this and it may be objected to, but it will get out. I spent three years in county jail building a defense. I took a insanity deal for 20 years. Instead of 56 years in prison now I've been out for quit some time. I also got some time to learn about my mental illness of Bipolar schizophrenia disorder witch caused a hedge reality disorder. Don't be afraid to do some time. You can milk the DA for a better deal that way to lol. hope this helps.
The law is uniform across all cultural believes... The best he could do is bargain for leniency, cite an abusive upbringing and remorse on the part of the defendant. Then keep fingers crossed for a reduced sentence. Very bad argument...
Help!!! Emergency!!! 1.) Dearest Lawyers, I Wrote my past experiences, writing about illegal transactions, discoveries, Is it possible that Police Authority put me inside the Jail because of Libel case? Thank you for your time.
He repeats the same words too many times stays stuck on the same subject for way too long. You wana keep things brief and simple but at the same time getting your point across. What you dont wana do is read a book to the jury or tell a bedtime story like this clown is doing I cant believe he is a attorney, who would hire such idiocy I mean really😑😑🙄
Good intentions but unfortunately a poor delivery. It was hard to follow his points when he was almost rambling and stumbling over his words but I’m sure the interruptions must have thrown him off
Judge is not even paying attention bet he was playing Solitaire
The jury are the only ones making a verdict. The judge does not have to pay full attention although he should at least look productive.
@@danielbaer8924 but it would be respectable to pay attention
yawaogekiltnodbustnoD I suppose so. It looks as if he was filling out forms though.
Carlene Wagner shopping list......check
I think his doing a crossword puzzle
"Defense, please give your closing argument."
"Uhhh, we live in a society?"
No. His argument is concerning culture and how every American breaks the law due to culture, such as the flow of traffic. That's a good argument. The culture of this person's school contributes to the defendant's behavior. Memes like the ones you wrote ('we live in a society') are hollow simplistic mocking misrepresentations of substantive issues and explanations.
I know it's easy to be a keyboard attorney and joke, but it's misleading when the joke exists simply to entice a laugh rather than having any semblance of satire that contributes to a larger point. No closing argument can be articulated in one sentence like the one you made. I'm not "triggered" (another overused meme). I'm just explaining the importance of why you are wrong. The lawyer did a fine job.
If any American here begrudges this attorney, then write and call your Congressmembers and pressure them to amend the 6th Amendment of our Constitution. But that amendment will never be amended democratically because the right to legal representation is a core component of a strive towards freedom and democracy. Note that I said a "strive towards" democracy. The issue of whether the United States is actually a pure and legitimate democracy is grounds for another discussion.
6th Amendment: read it. The Constitution: read it. It's very short. You can get through the whole thing in 10 minutes. B
Btw, from the culture (context) of this comment section, I can tell that your upvotes stem from a mockery and ignorance of due process, not just from humor. That's why I replied. You're right: "we do live in a society" is a part of the argument, but you've eliminated the context of culture. To the reactionaries: I am "chill". Writing is not a burden to me nor does it indicate anger. Writing is actually 1/3 of my career. Reading and speaking are the other 2/3s.
Hahaha yes
@@AlmostaFlipinSkater cringe get a life
Lolhaha
I searched for "best closing arguments" and this popped up.I am utterly disappointed.
Ditto.
Depends on your point of view. Would a competent closing argument that actually got this kid off be "better"? You'd have to define "better".
Let me fill you in. These attorneys have been preparing for months for these kinds of high-stake trials. He's probably have investigated all of the jurors' background. Every "um...ah...what's that word...?" is calculated to garner jury's attention/sympathy. The defense counsel is presenting himself as someone like a juror: a 55+ year old, likely retiree, who doesn't understand college kids. He's asking the juror to put themselves in the shoes of a college kid to understand his action. This is honestly the most well-prepared argument I have ever heard. It's not the attorney's job to look like the smartest guy in the room; his job is to get the jury to his side. I have seen the best attorneys dressing down, looking folksy, etc., to get jurors to empathize with his clients.
@@phucle2076you gave the idea even better, i couldn't understand what he was saying.
Just listen. Don't watch him because his delivery in physical terms is horrible but his thoughts aren't too bad.
*When you have to give a presentation for the class and you didn't prepare*
Jacob Stylus lmaooooo
Lawrence de Sola I know 😂
Jacob Stylus are you a trial lawyer I think not.I went to siu school of law for 5 years and I got my b degree in us history, and if your wondering my class rank I came out to 4th in my class and I got my bar license if your wondering
@@blakemichaelis2214 1. What gives you the indication that he's not a trial lawyer?
2. Noone was "wondering" your class rank and school (irrelevant information)
3. Law school is only 3 years
XxxFreemodewarriorxxX 10 well it seems like you still have an upcoming fortnight live stream not expected from a lawyers in my option
Dunno why you guys are hating. What else was he supposed to do? There was physical video evidence of his client’s actions. All he can do in that situation is to manipulate their emotions to minimize his client’s sentence.
Yeh thats why the law system is such a complicated mess, especially the Lawyering buisness they get promotions and is able to advance they're carreers the more cases theyve one, this systems not promoting truth and justice its who ever has the best lawyer and the losing lawyer gets a potential downgrade if the more cases he lose, what if the person just keeps getting clients that has large amounts of evidence weighing on against them?
Facts
Your comment is correct. But also as someone in a law program a opening statement can’t be long drown out at Boring
I dont think that's quite right, im not sure about Tennessee but in most jurisdictions the jury ascertains an accused's guilt. If the defendant is found guilty he is remanded in custody and there is a separate hearing for sentencing further down the track where the judge gives out a sentence commensurate with precedent and the facts/seriousness of the crime
Wow that’s tough defending a rapist
MegaSuperCritic his job
When it’s rape and they have all the evidence it’s best to take a plea deal
An alleged rapist. It has to be proven in court.
@@kirkrintoul328 thank you
@You stole my burrito, Charlie They have to. Every person in this country should have access to a lawyer that will advocate for them.
This man is just doing his job. He doesn't try to actually DEFEND his client. He KNOWS that his client did it. And he's not trying to give his client a reason for a mistrial.Hes not talking about evidence or the credibility of the victim. Hes talking out of his ass and he knows it😂😂😂
His just there for the money,that's why it's better to represent yourself.Don't believe in the bullshit that you need a degree to be a lawyer.All you need is to study and understand the law,understand the judicial process,
learn how to present and argue your case by formulating good defence strategies.Even when the state presents evidence against your actions you can scrutinize every detail and how it was obtain.Question,critique and scrutinize the evidence,the witnesses,even the investigators of the case.
Santo Paraiso it’s tough to do that, and the fact is that most people who think they can just don’t know enough to know they probably shouldn’t - myself included.
Try reading about the Dunning-Kruger effect - it’s pretty fascinating.
@@santoparaiso4129 Well its not so easy to first learn how to practice law amd then find all the evidence you need to defend yourself in the time an educated lawyer would use just to build the case.
@Hot Water Everyone deserve and should have a right to a lawyer. Youre conpletely innocent UNTIL found guilty. So he didnt defend a guilty man, he defended an innocent man that probably was found guilty after the trial.
@Hot Water He has an obligation to help the defendant, and do so the best way he can.
Did he practice lmaoo this man going to jail
He won the court case
"Is it wrong, is it against the law? Yea!"
WOE
💀
Wtf man I'm high but I was like wtf is he talking abt...
Saul Goodman much lol
The cringe is real with this argument. He’s essentially shifting the blame from his defendant to our “culture” as young adults.
raxmarrone it's all he can do really
raxmarrone there is nothing he could of done honestly
Yea, and his culture was given 15 years in prison.
Chazal Buster lmao
No, the blame is shifted to the victim. Everyone is owner of his own actions.
He just basically said, rape is apart of their culture lol
You took the words out of my mouth
Nemesis and without consent put them in my mouth
No, "Smashing" is
WAIT ✋ is it "apart" or "a part of"
Jesus loves you ✝️❤️
I don't even think he believes his own argument
Judge plans to give defendant 5 years
After closing argument
Judge plans to give him 10 years
he won the case
Man... a plumber could have done it much better just speaking out of cuff... defense is not your calling...
He won...
Ben Simmons tried doing his job and lost.
@@bensimmons6149 did he actually?
Lawyer: I see the sign saying 55 but i stay at 60-65
Judge looking at his ass like he wants to arrest him personally for doing that
Honestly if you think about the traffic analogy it honestly helped boost his argument. Yeah he went on a tangent of course but looking through the eyes of the lawyer, judge, and the jury. And also getting the idea around the case it honestly helped. You just have to think about it from a “there’s a video of what you did, were doing, and the victim. They know you did it but how can we slant their emotions” point of view.
Yeah that was him saying "don't judge ne for defending the rapist I have to but I dnt like it" hahahhaa
Okay, I have read too many comments from the arm-chair attorneys here to just not say anything. Let me fill you in. Attorneys like him have been preparing for months for these kinds of high-stake trials. There's videotape of his client committing wrongdoing, so the facts are undeniable that his client did it; he's just trying to mitigate the sentencing. To do that, he probably has investigated all of the jurors' background. Every "um...ah...what's that word...?" is calculated, rehearsed, practiced to garner juror's attention/sympathy. If you have been on jury duty, you know that most jurors are older, likely retirees. The defense counsel is presenting himself as someone like those jurors: a 55+ year old, likely retiree, who doesn't understand college kids. He's asking the juror to put themselves in the shoes of a college kid to understand his action. This is honestly the most well-prepared argument I have ever heard. It's not the attorney's job to look like the smartest guy in the room; his job is to get the jury to his side. I have seen the best attorneys dressing down, looking folksy, wearing mismatched shoes etc., to get jurors to empathize with his clients.
What do you do?
I agree with you, if this was a medical situation, it was like a doctor who tried one last therapy he/she could try to lessen the pain on a patient that is diagnosed with terminal stage cancer.
This is when you know you're fk'd, ur defense is it's your culture
This guy could have went with tons of different shit. What fucking moron... Oh, it was a public defender.
I must be saying the right things coz i keep getting objections
😂😂😂😂😂
lmaoooo
Oh he's definitely going to jail😂
I was expecting it to be all ace attorney style
me 2
rj garcia that would have been epic
😆😆😆
If ace attorney was autistic or part of the boruto verse
*When you have to write a 5000 word essay and you have no idea on the topic.*
He was copying his best friend’s test paper in middle school yet still he copied his job. Now this is what happens
To be fair, I'm not sure what you could say in a closing argument for this case as the evidence was so overwhelming and damning.
He would have done a better job just standing there saying nothing
Can someone please remove the protective clear plastic covering on the back of the judge's monitor? That is supposed to be removed when it is taken out of the box. I'm trying to concentrate on what he is saying. Thank you.
😂😂😂😂😂
"I must be saying the right things, because I keep getting objected". - Um no, it's cos you're making bad arguments and sound like you prepared 15 minutes ago.
The defendants best argument at this point is that he did not receive competent defense.
When you get a law degree through an online course.
Lmao
One of those get a law degree in 6 months or less 🤣
You know the judge was watching 'Jackass' on silence. 'Damn, Bam. Thats yo' pops!'
Can this defense lawyer guy ever recover from this?
I was thinking what the hell he is arguing as defence until I listened the last few lines. Intelligent.
I've seen a lot of closing arguments and this lawyer forgot Rule # 2 as a lawyer " Know when to shut up"
Probably the best "closed" argument instead of "closing".
Yes, rape is around us everyday. That still does not mean it is right, or should be normalized. Man's talkin out his ass 🤷♀️
Did the rapist ever go to jail?
LOL... everyone on youtube is a lawyer now.
Ineffective. Pity party closing.
"I must be saying the right things cause I keep getting objections" nice come back.
The whole point of Justice is give out punishment to who deserves it and mercy who deserves it.
then your justice system is wicked because everyone deserves mercy
@@jsmith434w Wrong.
@@user-pp6gx2rk8t people like you think youre safe but can you guarantee your children, grandchildren will never make a terrible mistake and end up in there? the point of the justice system isnt to rehabilitate and reintegrate, like it should be, but to punish everyone within it, good or bad, accidental or deliberate wrongdoing.
prison breeds criminals right now because what do you think would happen if suddenly, 90% of inmates, who are non-violent, were just put under house-arrest? a total industry collapse. that cant be allowed to happen now, can it? since when is the government been about downsizing?
by the way, people a person in a cage is an evil act, no matter what moral gymnastics you do to justify it. and plenty of innocent people have rotted in there for decades.
Man standing in court admitting he’s speeding on a daily basis.
Man took a shot of vodka then said alright let's defend my client who already has no chance
Ain't this social concern??? this shouldn't be put that way
exactly 😂 he's essentially arguing for leniency for all rapists.. wtf
“uhhhh, we live in a societyyy”
Got a chuckle out of me with him saying he’s doing the right thing if they keep objecting. Call them on their bs.
geeeezzz if my freedom was on the line with this guy i would NOT be feeling too good lmao
If you have video evidence against you and dna evidence I'm sure no 10000 lawyer can save you. So before you talk 💩 think about what you say before you type
he's literally the devils advocate
51? He looks more like he’s in his mid 40s. Guy is doing great
For all of those who think this guy is talking out of his ass, he isn't. The first piece about looking through it from the lens of a 51 year old vs the accused is telling the jury that they need to get into the perspective of the accused, not their own perspective. This is called subjective mens rea. For a guilty conviction the prosecutor needs to prove this mental element beyond a reasonable doubt. But this has to be from the accused's perspective, that he had the intention to commit w.e. he committed - from the sounds of it a sexual assault. The lawyer than ended with the accused drinking excessively. This is pointing to the defense of incapacity, if the accused drank to the point where he couldn't even remember what he did; how can the prosecution be sure he had the intention to commit his crime? The answer is they shouldn't be able to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt.
Note, I am a law student not from America but the common law system is similar. Jurisdiction can have different exceptions for sexual assaults with the burden of proofs.
The delivery I admit was hilarious, but if you had the back drop of what he is trying to do; it's not that bad.
I cannot believe someone let him deliver that argument. i mean surely his firm or even his paralegal would have knocked something into him.
Whereas he should not look at the jury, he should look present in the moment.
This man definitely watched better call Saul
This kid went from getting a few years in prison to maximum penitentiary for life...if this was my lawyer I’d cut him off and just take it on my self
he clearly knows whats up and wants to punish the rapist.. this technically is a great defense closing
I don’t know if this is possible but my mom died from a very very bad flesh eating disease and it came out of nowhere eight months before all this came down to see 19 can I sue because I know it was from that they kept it from us
Take your hand out of the pocket, Sir.
On his way to become Saul Goodman
Hello, good morning, I want to be a refugee in the United States. How can I become a refugee?
...by speaking off the cuff.... (correcting my own mistakes )
This is embarrassingly cringy, I feel so bad 😂 he was not prepared at all 💀 whoever he is “defending” is over there crying knowing he bout to go to jail😩
The worst part is he actually was kind of on to something 💀 had he presented this case better, the kid probably could have gotten off the hook with a slap on the wrist smh
Movies can make you think every guy with a law degree has a flow and a beat.
If this dude is a lawyer, then even i have a bright future ahead being a lawyer too!
There really wasn’t much he could do
Is it legal for a prosecuting attorney to use coercion and threats to get some one to plead guilty for a crime that person didn't do.
Did you know the police don't even have to do an investigation on particular crimes all they need is someone to point their finger at the party they suspect is guilty
he’s doing his job chill. Being a lawyer who deals with serious crimes aren’t always supporting justice. Lawyers aren’t about justice. don’t expect them to be.
Stop justifying incompetency and malpractice.
@@user-pp6gx2rk8tso to defend a rape case that your defendant did, caught on camera, what is the best argument for it? I want to know, since you seemed like a capable person
When I came into this office for the first time I was amazed by how nice everyone was. They all went out of their way to greet me and make me feel comfortable. I knew at Harris, I always had someone in my cornir fighting for me. I would recommend this firm to anyone because of how professional they were and how easy they made my experience.
you were represented b this firm? may I ask what case you were involved in?
@@noobyproducions4092 yeah tell us!!!!
Show them the video
If he addressed a British jury like this I think the judge would probably have picked up a copy of Blackstones and lobbed it in his general direction!......lol.....very tough to watch. Sympathy for the jury who had to endure the whole trial.
He’s an alright lawyer overall he should be a priest or a game show host
The last minute would have been a more plausible argument to focus on. Being so drunk that Corey possibly couldn’t have been functional enough to cause intent.
Trueeeeee the rest was poorly spoken and indirectly said his guilty by given the jurors a confirmation of the case before them
@@georgecarrera18 thing is I belief that the law and facts were stacked against the defendant anyway and the atorney knew that.
So he tried every angle which may give the jury some reason to be mercyful.
Beeing it the surounding culture, the media glorifying violence or alcohol, anything that makes his client less accountable for his actions helps if you cannot argue law or facts.
@@alberich3099 valid point but could had use possibly the excusal defense then In conjunction with how modern media glorifies sex disrespect of woman and speaking of any possible abuse defendent may sustain or mental health I feel could've done better
19 year old defendant: 😟
I think that would be way better if he called Saul
When there is video evidence, what else is thus lawyer supposed to say, to
minimize the sentence of his client?
Not to Bad ! Much better than my own attorneys, anyway. But La Banque Postale makes me pay a tax to get a better one !
He basically indirectly pointed point at the defendant
great video guys @t
I’m about 100% sure he is in breach of court mandate when he directly addresses the jury!
Bro, what?
Wtf is this guy even saying
It somehow reminds me Better Call Saul.
jimmy was an amazing lawyer. But this dude kinda looks like chuck and hamlin combined
Legend says the defendent sued his lawyer🤣
Defense attorneys of rapists and murders have a special place in hell.
Lmao if you ever step out of the real world you'll see how unfair and unreasonable your assigned jobs can get
When you decide to wing it but then realize you fucked up
Always use your rights. Especially when being questioned. Plea the fifth. Request the discover, look at the evidence against you. In some states you can waive your speedy trial like Oregon. this time can be used to have a privet investigator help with getting statements from victim. Also, expert witness, corrector witness, a reliability of witness against you or for you. Some witness will dip out. Can state in court to this and it may be objected to, but it will get out. I spent three years in county jail building a defense. I took a insanity deal for 20 years. Instead of 56 years in prison now I've been out for quit some time. I also got some time to learn about my mental illness of Bipolar schizophrenia disorder witch caused a hedge reality disorder. Don't be afraid to do some time. You can milk the DA for a better deal that way to lol. hope this helps.
Where is the result
0:58 The judges face 🤣
The woman behind him looked so done lmao
Saul Goodman? Is that you?
I prey that someone can help me my mom died from this and they kept it a Secret see somebody help me Amen🙏
Looks like a Baldwin brother with glasses.
How did I get into this thing called Raprure is more appropriate.
Continue
The law is uniform across all cultural believes... The best he could do is bargain for leniency, cite an abusive upbringing and remorse on the part of the defendant. Then keep fingers crossed for a reduced sentence.
Very bad argument...
Help!!! Emergency!!!
1.) Dearest Lawyers,
I Wrote my past experiences, writing about illegal transactions, discoveries,
Is it possible that Police Authority put me inside the Jail because of Libel case?
Thank you for your time.
This reminds me also of Billy Madison on the debate of business ethics.
He repeats the same words too many times stays stuck on the same subject for way too long. You wana keep things brief and simple but at the same time getting your point across. What you dont wana do is read a book to the jury or tell a bedtime story like this clown is doing I cant believe he is a attorney, who would hire such idiocy I mean really😑😑🙄
They should call Saul
Better call Saul next time
Did you won the case?
violent rape and hung over regret about the previous nights activities are NOT the same thing.. Thats what this Defense lawyer is saying.
This case last over a course of 6mos. he’s probably heard the lot of it. This is the closing for the most part
Good intentions but unfortunately a poor delivery. It was hard to follow his points when he was almost rambling and stumbling over his words but I’m sure the interruptions must have thrown him off