I bought the RX100m7 instead of another lens for my A73/A7S3 figuring the 24-200mm was better spent money than a single lens. Once I started using it I realized how much I hated dealing with the size, weight, cards, file size.....etc of the larger cameras. Wish I had of bought the RX100 first because it would have saved me a ton of money in spite of its limitations. I like it so much I just picked up a second one in case Sony discontinues the line. I think it's a huge mistake for Sony to drop the RX line.
I have both the RX100m7 and the ZV1m1 in a kit that I use when a 1" sensor can do the job. The RX100 very much shines for stills and for manual controls. The ZV1 is better set up to more conveniently do video, especially when letting the camera auto select settings. Either model can do both stills and video, but I have preferred use cases for these sibling models. The screen polarization on both was a big problem, as I wear prescription polarized sunglasses, but I found my way around that. The RX100m7 is fantastic. 5 years old, yes, but still very much a top notch camera. There's a reason they still command very high prices, and it isn't hype. RX100 delivers.
@@davidfirth1 can’t you get the glasses in non polarized flavor? I have too many cameras, can’t recall the bad behaviors, went non polarized, no more issues.
Look at the crop factor. 2.8 with a crop factor of 2.7 is about F8 full frame. So, you don't really have to stop down. This can produce some wonderful images.
I only got one at the middle of May this year and I think it's a good option. My only other camera similar is a Canon 750D which isn't as compact but I am not sure how they compare with kit lenses
I just participated in the involuntary loaner program with a new Panasonic ZS200D at a concert. But while the zoom was great, I found the camera a little clunky to use and am now in the market for my next “loaner”, most likely the RX100 VII. But even the used prices are giving me pause, especially if I “misplaced” another loaner. :(
for the shorter range, you can get the zv1, which is darn close, and dirt cheap used, I think I got mine for $250 on CL lol. I feel like telephoto is always a struggle with any ILC system, hence why so many gravitate towards M43 for instance. Telephoto gets increasingly difficult with the larger the sensor, and I just love mixing compressed shots with the "normal" range, and I do miss the larger aperture for sure, but practically, I set it to the back of my mind and simply have at it.
@@cameraprepper7938 I owned and loved the RX100 VA for 4 years, (2019-2023), until I traded it to get the ZV1. It was at this time I discovered what I was missing out on with 4k video. The RX100 VA has a 5min record limit for 4K video that I don’t think you can get around, and absolutely no 4k hand held stabilization what so ever. You can’t use Catalyst Browse to stabilize footage from the RX100 VA in post. The 4K video quality was spectacular but unusable hand held. Must use a gimbal, tripod, or rest camera on a stationary surface. For HD, stabilization was very good. No microphone audio input jack though. The pop up flash and EVF are great for photos, but there were problems at the 24mm end for me with barrel distortion, same as zv-1. I didn’t care really at first but as I used it more I came to detest the stretching at 24mm. Distortion went away at 50mm, and this was the sweet spot for me, but closer to the 70mm range the contrast on photos would fall apart. The flash shooting with the RX100 VA, which I always used, really hid the camera’s limited low light performance which really shows up when shooting in low light with the identical sensor and lens system of the ZV1, (no built in flash). Good luck with the rx100 VA. I hope you enjoy it.
@@CharlieVN I do not like cameras that do not have an EVF ! For general photography, I never use less than 60 megapixels full frame cameras with prime Lenses. So if I do want more "compression", I can just crop a lot.
The RX100 Vii is a great small pocketable camera, but the think for me that made it make no sense in 2019 (for me) is the same thing that makes it make no sense today. The price! $1300 albeit new can get you a gently used full frame Sony A7C, with the 20-60mm kit lens. I got a an open box A7C with the kit lens from $1200 in Jan 2024 right after Christmas. You can argue the Rx100 Vii has different strengths, (zoom lens, and video capabilities), but Switching systems you can get a Panasonic S9, full frame interchangeable lens for a similar price, or a fixed lens Fuji film x100 V. There are better values for the money if you don’t need the zoom range the lens offers.
@@Cthames123 the are plenty of better values, price performance, but focusing on size, hard to beat the rx100. I did have the zve1 and this is my first trip without a ILC, probably in 20 years, the relief of bringing a small camera is really nice. Small tripod, battery, lack of sling, it’s super nice.
I bought the RX100m7 instead of another lens for my A73/A7S3 figuring the 24-200mm was better spent money than a single lens. Once I started using it I realized how much I hated dealing with the size, weight, cards, file size.....etc of the larger cameras. Wish I had of bought the RX100 first because it would have saved me a ton of money in spite of its limitations. I like it so much I just picked up a second one in case Sony discontinues the line. I think it's a huge mistake for Sony to drop the RX line.
It is a sweet camera, and I'm going to make a video about how I made a special youtube creator case for it, and yes, gonna sell it
What type cage from Smalleidge you use and what brand/type filteradapter?
It's not outdated if it matches your other cameras.
I just used my RX100V as a B cam for a professional shoot.
Waiting for the RX100VIII.
But I think Sony will sooner do the RX1-III
The only shortcoming of the RX-100M7 is that it is incredibly small for it abilities, but that is also its main advantage.
I have both the RX100m7 and the ZV1m1 in a kit that I use when a 1" sensor can do the job. The RX100 very much shines for stills and for manual controls. The ZV1 is better set up to more conveniently do video, especially when letting the camera auto select settings. Either model can do both stills and video, but I have preferred use cases for these sibling models. The screen polarization on both was a big problem, as I wear prescription polarized sunglasses, but I found my way around that. The RX100m7 is fantastic. 5 years old, yes, but still very much a top notch camera. There's a reason they still command very high prices, and it isn't hype. RX100 delivers.
@@davidfirth1 can’t you get the glasses in non polarized flavor? I have too many cameras, can’t recall the bad behaviors, went non polarized, no more issues.
@@CharlieVN I'd get more headaches if I did, so, I wouldn't. Polarization takes care of so much more glare than a simple anti glare coating.
Íve got it. Itś a perfect camera with You all time. It´s a compliment to my Fuji xt5 camera! I love it!
Look at the crop factor. 2.8 with a crop factor of 2.7 is about F8 full frame. So, you don't really have to stop down. This can produce some wonderful images.
I only got one at the middle of May this year and I think it's a good option. My only other camera similar is a Canon 750D which isn't as compact but I am not sure how they compare with kit lenses
I just participated in the involuntary loaner program with a new Panasonic ZS200D at a concert. But while the zoom was great, I found the camera a little clunky to use and am now in the market for my next “loaner”, most likely the RX100 VII. But even the used prices are giving me pause, especially if I “misplaced” another loaner. :(
@@NikoOkamoto sorry to hear and yes the price is insane
Had one and sold it earlier this year in anticipation of a new version and still waiting... no question it's a beast that fits in your pocket.
I think they discontinued the rx100 series because of Smartphone cameras.
Instead they released the ZV-1 and ZV-II
You should pair your RX100 with a zhyiun m2, as a alternative to the pocket 3
What do you think of the RX1R II?
The Sony RX100 series are great, I would get the RX100 VA, I do not need a long tele Lens for a compact camera, I need larger aperture for low light !
for the shorter range, you can get the zv1, which is darn close, and dirt cheap used, I think I got mine for $250 on CL lol. I feel like telephoto is always a struggle with any ILC system, hence why so many gravitate towards M43 for instance. Telephoto gets increasingly difficult with the larger the sensor, and I just love mixing compressed shots with the "normal" range, and I do miss the larger aperture for sure, but practically, I set it to the back of my mind and simply have at it.
@@cameraprepper7938 I owned and loved the RX100 VA for 4 years, (2019-2023), until I traded it to get the ZV1. It was at this time I discovered what I was missing out on with 4k video.
The RX100 VA has a 5min record limit for 4K video that I don’t think you can get around, and absolutely no 4k hand held stabilization what so ever. You can’t use Catalyst Browse to stabilize footage from the RX100 VA in post. The 4K video quality was spectacular but unusable hand held. Must use a gimbal, tripod, or rest camera on a stationary surface. For HD, stabilization was very good. No microphone audio input jack though.
The pop up flash and EVF are great for photos, but there were problems at the 24mm end for me with barrel distortion, same as zv-1. I didn’t care really at first but as I used it more I came to detest the stretching at 24mm. Distortion went away at 50mm, and this was the sweet spot for me, but closer to the 70mm range the contrast on photos would fall apart. The flash shooting with the RX100 VA, which I always used, really hid the camera’s limited low light performance which really shows up when shooting in low light with the identical sensor and lens system of the ZV1, (no built in flash). Good luck with the rx100 VA. I hope you enjoy it.
@@CharlieVN I do not like cameras that do not have an EVF ! For general photography, I never use less than 60 megapixels full frame cameras with prime Lenses. So if I do want more "compression", I can just crop a lot.
I want this but it’s $1200 ❤😂 in my area 😮😢
I totally regret selling mine. 😢
think of the bright side, better than the California involuntary loaner program 😅
А на какую камеру ты снимал себя на протяжении всего видео у окна? Если это RX100m7 то качество ужасное. Почему?
black mist, f4 1/30 and ISO 6400++
The RX100 Vii is a great small pocketable camera, but the think for me that made it make no sense in 2019 (for me) is the same thing that makes it make no sense today. The price! $1300 albeit new can get you a gently used full frame Sony A7C, with the 20-60mm kit lens. I got a an open box A7C with the kit lens from $1200 in Jan 2024 right after Christmas. You can argue the Rx100 Vii has different strengths, (zoom lens, and video capabilities), but Switching systems you can get a Panasonic S9, full frame interchangeable lens for a similar price, or a fixed lens Fuji film x100 V. There are better values for the money if you don’t need the zoom range the lens offers.
@@Cthames123 the are plenty of better values, price performance, but focusing on size, hard to beat the rx100. I did have the zve1 and this is my first trip without a ILC, probably in 20 years, the relief of bringing a small camera is really nice. Small tripod, battery, lack of sling, it’s super nice.
You can't put those other cameras in your pocket. That's the glory of the RX100.
What district, mate?
go vap
You talk about video and image quality but film yorself with terrible backlight, really know what are you doing? The RX100 camera series is very good.
£900 UK
What? Are you Vietnamese? I thought you were Pinoy all this time..
@@lifetowander get that all the time, vn, not pinoy.
i have m6
Iphone blah blah blah, thankfully i own an S24 ultra ( and the rx100 vii)