interesting review but you missed the interesting point : gamma spectroscopy. you should make another test and analyse better the gamma spectrogramm you get. You couldnt see anything significant with KCl as you didnt leave the device measuring long enough. On the uranium glass , with Raysid I could already see the caractéristic spectrum of uranium glass and it looks like that Raysid is superior to radiacode.
@@totoff92 thanks for the idea! I did see tests that take about an hour to collect necessary data, so I simply skipped that comparison with thought that both of those devices are too small. Let me find spare time and do the check!
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
![ALLY - OH MY! [ REACTION ] 'Amarin Nitibhon' #ALLY_OHMY #ALLY #allynitibhon #แอลลี่](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nX9qpHjVfbQ/mqdefault.jpg)
interesting review but you missed the interesting point : gamma spectroscopy. you should make another test and analyse better the gamma spectrogramm you get. You couldnt see anything significant with KCl as you didnt leave the device measuring long enough. On the uranium glass , with Raysid I could already see the caractéristic spectrum of uranium glass and it looks like that Raysid is superior to radiacode.
@@totoff92 thanks for the idea! I did see tests that take about an hour to collect necessary data, so I simply skipped that comparison with thought that both of those devices are too small. Let me find spare time and do the check!