Seems like a much better rating system. However, you may want to re rate some other bows to see how the point scale compares. After that you may need to adjust the scale or methodology.
I think it is an excellent. Statistic informs the viewers to help use the information to consider purchasing bows. I especially think it would be good to send a copy of the review back to the bow builder, pointing out their deficits to a “potential” customer. Mention their better competitors include “all” the information. For me, the force graph is important and few builders provide it. Thank you Armin!
I think your rating process I’d efficient and transparent. It’s a good “evolution” of your process. I think the complainers could easily start their own channel an attempt to make a fraction of the effort you have made for years. Good on you Armin!
Hi Armin, You are not the only one thinking about bows during the night 😂 Now you’ll have to review all your bows again with this new method 😅 I really love your 3’ Fridays (the longer videos too)
The review that has been inplace was consistence and believable, To me (my opinion) that data was on target, no fluff, no buff, I like the spec that you provided... SO what was this about other that maybe filling a nitch for the group that's need's it.... Perhap so.... stay with the Engineering spec... Cheers
I was fine with the other rating(s) as well, but this one looks very detailed and transparent. Would you mind, if I use your new system, too? ☺️ Thank you so much for improving continuously, dear Armin! 😁👍
Gute Idee, die Umsetzung deiner Gefühle, Erfahrungen und Gedanken. Es kommt einer gerechten Beurteilung näher. Das Du die Aussage des Herstellers mit deiner Einschätzung vergleichst- wäre für mich wichtig. Andererseits, wenn Du sagen würdest, der Bogen ist gut, oder weniger gut, wäre MIR das auch genug.
This looks a lot more transparent than your normal system. So I vote for this one. However two points: 1. I am not sure it makes sense to judge every point already considering the price, or if it is better to judge everything on an absolute scale and then point out the price so people can judge for themselves if 100€ is good for a 7 point bow or whatever. 2. This might make your videos even longer and the temptation to skip forward stronger ;-)
I'm sure I got a string when I bought my qinghai (not an extra though... but I make my own Flemish twist strings anyway) .... im sure you mis-spoke. I'm going to save judgement until you've reviewed a few bows .... you have changed/developed your rating system over the years anyway. The early 'Malta Archery ' ratings were much less detailed than what you've used recently... but I do miss the bow tree and getting a good look at HOW a bow bends... all the best from Oz....
Hi Armin, I like your new rating system. This looks more differentiated than the old one. With the old one I had the impression that there was a bit too much emphasis on gut feeling.
Hello Armin, absolutely! There's nothing wrong with gut feeling. Especially when it comes from a qualified mouth. I work in quality assurance in a regulated environment, GMP etc., and am busy developing testing procedures for my company. Therefore, I appreciate when an evaluation is based on comprehensible criteria.
Bow companies or craftsmen should send some recommendation of arrows for their bows although it is cool to look for arrows in the process. Cheers Armin 😊☕️✨️🏹
AWESOME!!! I am now curious as to how the rating will go with some bows that you have reviewed previously, like Monarq, Cheonji, YMG, the Korean Warbow, AF Sicai, Tatar, and so on. I don't think you would have to go through every single one, but a few significant bows that you see deserve re-rating in your opinion.
Maybe make a rating for the bows and a separate rating for the additional goodies you want, but usually do not get. That way people who are interested in a bow are not misled by minus points due to lacking accessories. That could make the reviews again more interesting.
Now wait for it ..Lots of armchair experts coming out of their armchairs to "improve" it ! As the French say the enemy of the already good is the "better" ! The new system looks great ..Excited to see it in action going forwards ..Great work Armin ..
Seems to be reasonable, ...though I wonder if this is able to “compensate” the main “issue” of your ratings: your love for bows and archery (i.e. the several times mentioned “bow porn” 😂 aspect of your reviews).🤔😉🙂 ...But it might, as this system seems to force you to stay more analytical and to make yes/no decisions more often and by more details, which might keep your critical attention better “awaken”. Waiting for the first 5-10 reviews!😊
@@ArminHirmer 🙂That doesn’t seem to be possible, don’t worry. If anything it will add to it, as you’re going to see the bows from a bit different perspective. ...And discover new aspects of what you love is (mostly!) great fun.
seems this is very individual, I never had an issue with AF. And with some I never had any problems, so how could I rate something that did not happen for me?
All of this seems like to much work . I prefer the verbal tick methods Like the zoot or oooh armin tends to use This is opinion work So we tune in for the opinion Is he opinionated? Yep
![“อ.เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม” มาตามคำเรียกร้อง แหกศาสตร์ฮวงจุ้ย เตือนสติอย่างมงาย | แฉ 7 พ.ย. 67 [1/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5fc4S3xBNfc/mqdefault.jpg)
Seems like a much better rating system. However, you may want to re rate some other bows to see how the point scale compares. After that you may need to adjust the scale or methodology.
I never complained, I just learned Armin speak! Lol being nice without saying something negative is difficult... cheers!
Thats a great approach much appreciated .
I think it is an excellent. Statistic informs the viewers to help use the information to consider purchasing bows.
I especially think it would be good to send a copy of the review back to the bow builder, pointing out their deficits to a “potential” customer. Mention their better competitors include “all” the information. For me, the force graph is important and few builders provide it.
Thank you Armin!
Just want to join this request. This could be *very* useful. Would be interesting if the builders follow it 😊
Thanks for all your effort
Your energy reaches me through the screen, it's amazing. how is this possible? You are my best teacher. Thank you
I think your rating process I’d efficient and transparent. It’s a good “evolution” of your process. I think the complainers could easily start their own channel an attempt to make a fraction of the effort you have made for years. Good on you Armin!
Thanks for the huge effort behind this. I do not really care much about the details, I trust your knowledge.
A top 5 of your favourite bows using your new review scale could be interesting !
Very well put together rating system, looking forward to it in use. Good job :)
Hi Armin,
You are not the only one thinking about bows during the night 😂
Now you’ll have to review all your bows again with this new method 😅
I really love your 3’ Fridays (the longer videos too)
hahaha no way
Wohoo! Much better rating system! Looking forward to it.
The review that has been inplace was consistence and believable, To me (my opinion) that data was on target, no fluff, no buff, I like the spec that you provided...
SO what was this about other that maybe filling a nitch for the group that's need's it....
Perhap so....
stay with the Engineering spec...
Cheers
Well done and well thought out!
Armin, Very well done! Could you give us the highest point of rating so that we may understand how a 6.5 rating stacks up in your system? Cheers
10
I was fine with the other rating(s) as well, but this one looks very detailed and transparent.
Would you mind, if I use your new system, too? ☺️
Thank you so much for improving continuously, dear Armin! 😁👍
Sure :)
@@ArminHirmer Thank you! 😁🙏
@@ArminHirmer I would like to stick to this request. If its okay for you, we will try to use your System as well 😀. Best regards from germany :)
Gute Idee, die Umsetzung deiner Gefühle, Erfahrungen und Gedanken. Es kommt einer gerechten Beurteilung näher.
Das Du die Aussage des Herstellers mit deiner Einschätzung vergleichst- wäre für mich wichtig.
Andererseits, wenn Du sagen würdest, der Bogen ist gut, oder weniger gut, wäre MIR das auch genug.
Yea this makes more sense. Also smoothes of draw is a big deal for me. I've pulled some 35# bows that were stiffer than some 45#
This looks a lot more transparent than your normal system. So I vote for this one. However two points:
1. I am not sure it makes sense to judge every point already considering the price, or if it is better to judge everything on an absolute scale and then point out the price so people can judge for themselves if 100€ is good for a 7 point bow or whatever.
2. This might make your videos even longer and the temptation to skip forward stronger ;-)
I'm sure I got a string when I bought my qinghai (not an extra though... but I make my own Flemish twist strings anyway) .... im sure you mis-spoke.
I'm going to save judgement until you've reviewed a few bows .... you have changed/developed your rating system over the years anyway. The early 'Malta Archery ' ratings were much less detailed than what you've used recently... but I do miss the bow tree and getting a good look at HOW a bow bends... all the best from Oz....
Hi Armin,
I like your new rating system.
This looks more differentiated than the old one.
With the old one I had the impression that there was a bit too much emphasis on gut feeling.
Well that what matters for me in my reviews :)
Hello Armin,
absolutely! There's nothing wrong with gut feeling. Especially when it comes from a qualified mouth.
I work in quality assurance in a regulated environment, GMP etc., and am busy developing testing procedures for my company.
Therefore, I appreciate when an evaluation is based on comprehensible criteria.
Interesting rating system 👍
sounds good Armin😀👍
Well, good morning :D
Now this looks pretty detailed, for sure. Let's see how it'll work out :) Thumbs up for the effort 👍
Perfect progression of reviews. Legendary ,,Deutsch Präzisionsarbeit '' online :)
Greetings from Czechia, my dear neighbour and teacher...
Information is ok if it's on the bow, in the package, on the package or on the website.
Good rating system!
nice thank you
Bow companies or craftsmen should send some recommendation of arrows for their bows although it is cool to look for arrows in the process. Cheers Armin 😊☕️✨️🏹
Happy Friday my old friend 🏹
Would be nice if there was a direct comparison to the old rating system. What did this bow rate using the old system?
AWESOME!!! I am now curious as to how the rating will go with some bows that you have reviewed previously, like Monarq, Cheonji, YMG, the Korean Warbow, AF Sicai, Tatar, and so on. I don't think you would have to go through every single one, but a few significant bows that you see deserve re-rating in your opinion.
I will consider :)
would be good to have something like a comparison to a group average (Korean, Manchu, Persian, etc.) and/or top metric for each class
Maybe make a rating for the bows and a separate rating for the additional goodies you want, but usually do not get. That way people who are interested in a bow are not misled by minus points due to lacking accessories. That could make the reviews again more interesting.
reason I include it to "force" the bow builders to step up their game ;)
I like it 👍👍
nice
Now wait for it ..Lots of armchair experts coming out of their armchairs to "improve" it ! As the French say the enemy of the already good is the "better" ! The new system looks great ..Excited to see it in action going forwards ..Great work Armin ..
of course :D
Seems to be reasonable, ...though I wonder if this is able to “compensate” the main “issue” of your ratings: your love for bows and archery (i.e. the several times mentioned “bow porn” 😂 aspect of your reviews).🤔😉🙂 ...But it might, as this system seems to force you to stay more analytical and to make yes/no decisions more often and by more details, which might keep your critical attention better “awaken”. Waiting for the first 5-10 reviews!😊
yeah lets see how much it will take away from my fun hahaha
@@ArminHirmer 🙂That doesn’t seem to be possible, don’t worry. If anything it will add to it, as you’re going to see the bows from a bit different perspective. ...And discover new aspects of what you love is (mostly!) great fun.
uh...what...?...
Too bad you don't include customer service, cuz AF Archery's Sucks!
Overall a good rating system!
seems this is very individual, I never had an issue with AF. And with some I never had any problems, so how could I rate something that did not happen for me?
Yeah, just my life. They won't return emails either. Still trying to get a new string from them!
All of this seems like to much work .
I prefer the verbal tick methods
Like the zoot or oooh armin tends to use
This is opinion work
So we tune in for the opinion
Is he opinionated?
Yep