‘Stop whining’: Piers Morgan clashes with Peter Hitchens on Ukraine-Russia war
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Sky News Australia host Piers Morgan clashed with The Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens regarding the cause of the Ukraine-Russia war and how the conflict could end.
Mr Morgan questioned Mr Hitchens on how the war could end with both Russia and Ukraine refusing to give up territory.
“I would have thought the position the Ukrainians find themselves in now is very strong if they go through negotiations,” Mr Hitchens said.
“I don’t know what would take place in negotiations.”
The columnist complained to the Sky News Australia host that he was being interrupted as Mr Morgan told him to “stop whining and answer the question”.
“There has never been any suggestion from me … that Ukraine should give up territory,” Mr Hitchens said.
His stance on Covid must not be forgoten.
Hear hear! It saddens me that JH-B is such a sabre-rattler over Ukraine, but at least she had a solid and principled stance over Covid restrictions.
He also doesn't give a fuck about the nationists of Northern Ireland,,,
Yeah Peter was right about covid and piers was wrong so I think piers should listen to hitch more
@@gavinjames141 in which way was he wrong?
Putin's stance on covid? Or Zalinsky's?
Morgan can’t just shut up and let his guests speak for longer than 5 seconds can he?
piers as well as the audience get frustrated with classic evasion tactics like talking around the issues ...quite clearly the guy said there should be negotiations but captured territory should be given back ...piers wanted to know how this could occur given Russia's obvious track record with say Crimea??.... at some stage you just have to call the guy out.
@@bepitan fair point, but the guests never even get to ‘evasion tactics’ besides Peter Hitchens isn’t some backbench MP who has been told to tow a Party Line, he’s a very intelligent guy who, like his brother RIP, never struggles to provide a convincing argument if allowed to express it. Maybe that’s why a person of limited debating skills like Morgan cut him off so quickly?
@@thecornedbeefcouncil9792 you know if this guy had just carried on answering the specific question then piers would have given him the floor but the moment he wanders off piste which is what he kept doing over and over then piers is forced to corral him which all the less astute people listening take as talking over or bullying ...to me its plainly obvious whats really happening here.
Well, maybe someone should inform Piers that UK provided depleted uranium ammo to Ukraine...and Russia will never forget that. I'm pretty sure he will shut up then.
On second thought, nah, he will not. He's tfg.
@@bepitan no, that isn’t Peter Hitchens style. I don’t agree with everything he says but he’s well informed and more than capable of arguing his point without resorting to waffle. He would eat Morgan alive in any debate.
Piers is like a big baby sometimes having the last word all the time.
Common sense will always do that...
Morgan, Madelely on other platforms they would be troll's
Tells Hitchens to stop whining, but according to my missus that overgrown cry baby Morgan used to have massive uninterrupted rants on Good Morning Britain before stropping off when he was challenged. Morgan is a pathetic disgrace and hates dissent. Remember the fake photographs of the British Army when you were editor of the Mirror, Morgan?! C**t.
Sometimes?
But here Pier's stance is very correct. Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians appreciate it. Peter is still delusional (childish and foolish way of thinking) on how one can reach agreement with Russians. It never happens. FULL STOP. Kick them in face and start from there.
Lord Dannat realised Piers wasn't going to let him get a word in so he logged off 😂
Send Morgan to Ukraine for some first hand feedback on life in a warzone.
Keep him there!
Keep him there!
he would only be stationed in kiev or lviv like most other journalists and diplomats, far from the frontlines.
Target practice for the Russians
You first, if you think that sort of thing is a great idea.
Morgan always interrupts/talks over gest when he doesn't like the answers.
Hitchens gave no answers! That's why Piers called him out on it!
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 🤡
I see that Piers main ability is to talk fast, and so he keeps interrupting the other person. It is hateful.
Yes. Really annoying. Piers is a definition of what is wrong.
It so disgust me to see journalist speaking directly for their governments instead of asking independent questions and presenting the facts, so that we can analyse and judgements for ourselves. The western media disappoints me on a daily.
He's a interruption artist lol,
That is Piers Morgan - arrogance personified .
It's Piers Morgan, what do you expect. The guy is just an entitled posh twat
You poor bastard.
While I do agree with you, Peter’s argument was pretty week in itself. “War is bad, there should be negotiations”. What would the negotiations entail? “I don’t know, that’s not my Job”.
He has an admirable stance on the war, but he didn’t seem to have any worthwhile arguments about to how to achieve it.
Piers Morgan: This is an interview. I get to ask the questions.
Piers Morgan: constant interruptions and answering the questions himself.
PM is one of the worst interviewers I've ever seen... His 'guests' never get to speak if PM doesn't like their point of view! I think he only has them on his show so he can get to berate them!
That’s what he does best when start to hear what is doesn’t want to hear
This is what happens when the interviewer knows the points he wants to make are indefensible
Morgan the total muppet
Piers Morgan should interview his own ego in a mirror.
I dont think he'd be able to finish his 1st question! 😅
@@drhfuhruhurr4253😂😂😂😂😂
That mostly describes his interviews.
He would absolutely LOVE that .
The mirror will win the argument.
Never forget Morgans rabid, pro lockdown stance during CONvid 1984
Whilst holidaying in the Carribean after telling viewers to stay indoors
Or that he presided as editor of a gossip rag, The Mirror, which published fake photos about the British Army on its face front page.
Ironic a fool with the name not fooled 😂😂😂
He's an awful man
Never forget Hitchens wanted no lock downs at all.
Piers's bullying efforts to simplify a complex situation really make him seem dumb
Yeah suprised he's willing to come off that dumb.
@@SmudgeOfficialUK He came out much better than Peter-"I want peace, but have no clue how to get it"-Hitchens
@@ThomasDanielsen1000Nice try
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 what's your solution?
i simply refuse to even watch this guy anymore just a ego bully narcissist right or wrong but his behaviour is just unacceptable .
Piers apparently only likes his own opinion and the sound of his voice
Pure narcissists.
Morgan: what a disgusting bully! He uses his 'guests' as an incentive to rave on himself, and if they don't accept it, he humiliates them (they 'whine'! ). One advice to all future "guests": turn down any invitation from Morgan, so that he can rage on in his own 'program', which will shrivel in no time.
Damn, let the man speak for cryin out loud!
Piers Morgan trying to take on Peter Hitchens 🤣🤣🤣
Fail!!!
How I wish Christopher was still around
And succeeding. Htchens made no sense.
@@donaldgraham6414 how
Morgan is nothing more than a show pony. About as deep as a puddle.
Piers big problem is that the public have a very nasty habit of listening to all sides before coming to conclusions rather than just his personal biased position
Sadly not true for most of the public
Unfortunately you have people coming onto panels and just do a blanket statement of it needs to end in peace, well then how do you come about that peace and Hitchens couldn't add to that statement so started to whinge. Hitches has a habit of doing this.
You've got this totally wrong
@@DaboooogA me or the OP?
Hitchens is a moron. For peace to stand a chance, Russia should just leave Ukraine. Putin said the SMO’s real objective was always Donbas, yet his troops are still occupying the south of Ukraine.
Respect to you Mr Hitchens
Konstantin Kisin already told Hitchens that he is full of lies and propaganda. The old man isn't smart enough to get it.
Agreed. He shouldn’t have lowered himself to go on Morgan’s show though
@@Sanctified57 I’ve thought the same but then he might be using any means to reach out to wider audience
@@Sanctified57 The don't watch it, stupid.
@@avtandil1971 But he should know that Morgan (being one who above all is ratings focussed) will play dirty and do anything to win a debate.
Peter was pathetic.
Well done Piers for highlighting his meaningless virtue signalling.
Piers has absolutely no clue, what´s going on !
Kremlin propaganda victim alert!
could you explain whats going on then? how would a peace agreement work
he knows what has been happening since 2014 but will not say it on the MSM Ukraine Government are killing Ukraine people in the East of the country since 2014 because they speak Russian and Russia dont want to take over the whole country they are trying to protect the people in the east if they wanted they could have taken over the whole place last year but they dont want to kill lots of people.If it was America or the UK they would have gone in all guns blazing just like they did in Iraq I remember the words they used SHOCK AND AWE.
@@ernesthemingway3181 He doesn't.
None of them does.
They are alle parrots, "peace agreement, peace agreement", but none of them knows how it can be done.
"Piers has absolutely no clue"
*Must be, of course "Hitchens has absolutely no clue"*
HOW did everyone forget Ukraine was provided with over 150 soviet legacy jets and lost them all, together with 350 they already had?
East German MiG29 was vastly superior to F18.
Why would F16 (clearly inferior to MiG29) change anything?
Don’t talk sense please, Ukraine bots can’t accept it.
I don't think I'd ever heard this Piers guy before. Is he a big name? I couldn't bear his interruptions. About two minutes was all I watched.
He's a big name in UK, unfortunately you in ozland now have to suffer him too.
Gosh...lucky you avoiding him up to now, but what bad luck it has ended!
Piers Morgan is by no means alone in this tendency to talk over interviewees. Sadly, it is what modern-day journalism has become. Too many journalists today see themselves as the focus of an interview, forgetting that their primary role is to extract information, not impose their opinion. The inevitable result is tension between the two parties, the disintegration of the interview, and of course, no one learns anything.
it's woke as well .
Its simple they only want the narrative, how dare you give me an alternative.
Exactly. They just want the interviewee to reinforce their own point of view. The interviewer should be asking questions in an effort to tease out sufficient information, allowing the audience to form their own views based on the information at hand.
Are u not scared that no one wants peace
Superbly put and dead accurate!
In 2010, Hitchens argued that Crimea should be part of Russia rather than Ukraine, claiming that the peninsula is historically Russian. In November, 2022, he asserted that there exists a "virulent" nationalism in Ukraine, and claimed that it is easier "to be a non-Scot in Scotland" than "an ethnic Russian in Ukraine" due to the "ugly strain of Ukrainian nationalism that made life difficult for ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
Yeah, he uses every opportunity he can get to smear the Ukrainians. Disgusting.
Piers thrives 9n antagonism. His brain chemistry needs rebooting methinks😅
Hitchens clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.
Mike Graham allows Peter to speak at length, so he's obviously disconcerted when Morgan constantly interrupts him. He's far more at ease on Graham's Show
Mike Graham is a fool to have this left wing twat on his show.
8:49 when you just can’t take Piers interrupting anymore.
Pierce's interview style is equivalent to a child putting their fingers in their ears and shouting when being told something they don't like.
But Pierce is correct though...How is negotiation possible if Putin don't give back Ukraine's land and pull his army back? The only way forward is brute force. NATO is stronger than Russia, should NATO have the right to invade Russia and annex part of it's territory, then ask for negotiation without giving the territory back?
@@johnbui6530 NATO started this war in 2014 by staging a coup to remove the elected president in Ukraine and installing the Nazi-AZOV party who started killing Russians ........Russia is NOT giving back anything.
@@johnbui6530 *your comment is laughable*
there was peace talk in Ankara 1st April 2o22 and that's why Russia pull out troops away from Kiev ( which was latter explained as Russian military weakness all around MSM ) - Than Boris Johnson got to Ukraine and stoped all that what was agreed in Russia-Ukraine negotiations - btw - main official Ukrainian negotiator was found in rubbish bin with bullet in his head - not to mention Minsk accords for which Angela Merkel and French Hollande openly admitted that they sign just to buy the time to arm Ukraine - not to mention shelling Donbas by Ukrainians since 2o14 CIA coup - not to mention burning Russian ethnics ALIVE 2nd May 2o14 at Trade Union Building in Odessa - *so - you have no idea what you even talking about* - NATO is just pathetic hyena feeding itself on Ukrainian blood since NATO Conference May 2oo8 in Bucharest - NATO have no balls nor means to fight Russia directly - nor will ever have - if you think that NATO can ignore Russian security concerns than you are greatly mistaken - the result is what you see know and you even dare to complain
The problem is that Hitchens never wanted to say what he wanted to say which is that Ukraine must give their lands.
This is why Piers shredded him to pieces.
@@johnbui6530 You what? If NATO entertained that, Russia and all anti western nations would be so galvanised against it, it would be WW3 and the end of the West. And maybe if Pierce wasnt a nilistic self indulgent moron, he and the rest of us could have heard and answer to that question, but he cant do because he is a jackass. NATO is stronger maybe, but NATO is a DEFENSIVE pact, not an offensive one. Any NATO nation who declares war does not have the backing of all the rest. Iraq demonstrated this.
As a viewer, my verdict is that Piers did not give Peter a proper chance to say what he needed to say.
Literally putting words in Peters mouth
a bit of advice to you piers..when you ask question.let the person answer
But the guests don't like Piers' questions and beat around the Bush like politicians. Thanks Piers.
"nobody likes war" then criticises peace talks.
peace talks that everyone with half a brain knows will go nowhere!
Well done hitchens for calling piers out for not letting you speak. In future just refuse to go on any programme he is hosting
Hitchens is an embarrassing mouthpiece for Russia. It’s easy to say “we all want peace” when you’re not on the receiving end of missiles, air strikes and tanks rolling through playgrounds. Embarrassing
he's been asked several times on what bases could peace talks start and never answered. It's a dialectical trick to convince people that ukrainians want war, when reality tells they lost 25% of their territory, hundreds of thousands people and Russia continues to say that it wont never give back what it has unlawfully taken. Just think what would you do if Germany started an attack on british land and conquered Wales. And some Hitchens comes and tells that Brits to avoid war have to start peace talks with germans without having back its territory first!!
Not letting people he is supposedly "interviewing" speak is Piers Morgan's trade mark.
I would have thought it’s easier to want piece if you are on the receiving end of missiles. And he’s not a mouthpiece for Russia, he’s just not as ignorant as people like Morgan and yourself who think Putin just woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine
@@barefoot.cryptographer3974 Do you have any idea how this started? Let me remind you: the Ukrainian nazis overthrew an elected government with the help of Brussels when they refused to join the EU after a referendum. The nazis took power after slaughtering their own people and started bombing civilians. 14.000 dead in six years. They also took a huge dump on every agreement of not joining NATO and bringing western military in the back yard of Russia. So, Ukraine gets what it deserves and then some. There is absolutely no scenario in which they can win, zelensky is ultimately murdering his own citizens while posing for the cover of vogue and getting more money than he has ever dreamed. And I repeat, you all seem to conveniently forget that those people are NAZIS for fucks sake. So, go Russia as long as I'm conserned, they should already have turned the land of Ukraine into glass. And I wish they do at some point so this whole thing is over, permanently
Piers never listens to anyone who opposes his biased and prejudiced opinion 😊
Hitchens was worth listening to. Unfortunately you're not allowed to stray 'off narrative'.
How about giving Palestine weapons to liberate themselves?
When is Musket Morgan leaving to fight in the international unit? What? Never ? Oh, he's a whiskey warrior 😅
No,a wanker!
I would love to challenge Pierce to be able to listen for 1 minute straight
Peter Hitchens the shameful brother
Piers knows nothing 😂😂😂😂😂
$
I don't like Piers Morgan or Sky News, but in this case, I agree with Morgan. Hitchens is trying to pitch a bunch of nonsense. Negotiations without giving up territory? What BS. Piers is right to continue to challenge him. He just doesn't like being put under scrutiny.
Incredible. Asks a question and then either makes a statement or asks another one.
This bearded guy got owned. He can't even shave his mustache properly, let alone talk about geopolitics. You can't have peace now. Putin does not want peace.
It is true to the point, that EU should use diplomatic route and think about peace back in 2012, and 2013 and didn't. And back in 2020 and 2021, they had more oportunities to solve this diplomaticaly (altho it was arguably too late by then). But they refused. EU and Ukraine both chose war right then and there, and they should avoid it for the benefit of Ukraine. So yes. You could talk about peaceful solutions back then. But now it's way too late. Now, that everyone is in it deep, the best course of action is to try to support Ukraine so they can maybe possibly win or at least get better deal at peace negotiating table. Putin can not win the war. And he can't win precisely because whole world supports Ukraine! Maybe Ukraine can not "win". But as long as they get support, Putin can not win either. And in such scenarios, it is usualy attacker that must eventualy settle and stop the attack.
There is one thing that Putin still can hope for however. And it is for countries to stop supporting Ukraine. That's why he's angry every time new weapons are getting delivered. And that's exactley what the broken mustache guy is arguing for!
@@Member_zero What peace exactly should have been thought about back in 2012/2013?
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 EU intitiated back then, because they didn't take Putin seriously. People were laughing at him, when he threathened with war.
Now you have it.
@@Member_zero you are well aware that peace talk between Russia and Ukraine started on 25/02/22, the next day after the war had begun. Two weeks later they were about to sign a peace deal with then Israeli prime Minister as a mediator. Then as per that Israeli prime Minister Boris Johnson flew to Kiev to stop this from happening and he did. "UK was for war, EU was practical and the US was both" - from Israeli prime Minister. Why did Zelenskiy followed what Boris wanted - we can guess, but the fact said by the Israeli prime Minister that the peace deal was reached and needed a signatures only. You said Putin is that and that: mate look no further than Bush and Blair in Iraq. You have now all their lies published. They are maniacs, no doubt. Putin had talked about red lines from 2000 - for 22 years. You don't care- I know- so why did US wanted to blow whole world in 1962 - missiles in Cuba. The same rule can be applied in this situation, can't be? Viktoria Nuland said there were biological military labs in Ukraine (32 as per Russia) with what- ? Lollipops. Try walk in Russian shoes. If your "colonial walking stick" stops you - threy it please away - 21st century now. You said 2014 - no mate it is 2009 when Georgia and Ukraine were pushed by US against will of some of EU countries to become NATO candidates. Russia would be surrounded by NATO countries in Black sea as it surrounded by NATO countries in Baltic sea. You would say - so what? - and here the history of UK and US participating in military conflicts in 190-195 countries. Do your math mate. Thirdly a peace - Minsk agreement 2015 - was just a fake to get Ukraine military ready to attack Crimea as per then Germany chief Merkel. Look I could not process this war between brother nations until I learnt about Israeli prime Minister and Merkel's statement. War was inevitable. I don't think you read it up to this point, but if you did please do your homework before posting brainwashed statements.
@@alexandrfedotov6791 The only one who's brainwashed is you if you believe all that pathetic Kremlin propaganda. The Minsk agreement was foisted upon Ukraine at gunpoint after Russia invaded Crimea and Donbas in 2014 - they were under no obligation to respect it after what Russia had done to them!
Hitchens will need to offer an acceptable solution. But alas, he won’t be able to do that, because he knows that the only acceptable solution is for Putin to withdraw from Ukraine’s sovereign territory. And Putin is very unlikely to do that.
Hitchens doesn’t like being disagreed with, he prefers to monologue and often acts victimised when opposed.
I don’t think he’s acting like a victim but Piers tends to be superficial and vapid. You can’t have a sound-byte discussion on Ukraine.
@@mervinpronepiers asked Mr Hitchens multiple times for an answer and Mr Hitchens decided to babble without actually providing one…
"All We are saying is give Peace a Chance!" Escalation into a Nuclear War is the only existential threat to the Human Race. Not life giving carbon dioxide for example. There's far more to this Proxy War than the MSM will ever admit to. Mr Morgan is in the MSN camp.
PEACE❤
"There's far more to this Proxy War than the MSM will ever admit to" Like what?
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 👈🏼NATO bot detected
@@azmagaref You could also just answer the question.
Wow, how is Piers still on TV?
Both these guys talk over others and watching this, is exactly how I thought it would go. As the years have gone by, Peter Hitchin's has become a real grumpy old man which I find a shame .. he used to be much more interesting years ago.
Pierce has little understanding of why this is happening or he pretends to not understand it. It didn’t just happen overnight, this has been a problem since 2014 and this is not as simple as calling Putin an evil dictator who just wants to take territory. The reality is much more complex than that. He’s difficult to listen to when he doesn’t listen to what other people have to say but spews unfounded bias.
I see Putin as an aggressor who ordered his troops to bomb another sovereign state, and it would make it simple sense for Putin to call back his troops, that could stop the war.
Except it is that simple. Politics or not, invading another country is a red line, and the declaration of independence declared the right of ALL MEN (not just americans) to choose their own governments
It is on the Russian people to admit to themselves and each other they are the tyrants here. Either they rebel and execute putin, or they suffer war and death themselves.
@@jameswadsworth7951 Never mind, we don’t need negotiations. Ukraine will “defeat” Russia, whatever that means. Endless dead bodies are perfectly fine as long as they’re not UK or American soldiers piling up, and any related excuse will do. Insanity rules the vast majority of the western society now. It’s pathetic at best and there is no bottom to the worst.
There's nothing complex about it: it started in 2014 when Putin invaded for the first time. In 2022 he came back for more. That's all there is to it. Not difficult!
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 Putin didn't invade in 2014. The collective west supported a coup to overthrow the elected government in Ukraine. Crimea voted to secede, not a shot was fired in Crimea but eastern Ukraine was a different story where the coup government attacked their own citizens. Your version of this being simple is ridiculous. Plenty of documentation on everything I just wrote.
Having watched other interviews involving Peter Hitchens, I've come to the conclusion that this man's ego will not permit him to engage in fruitful debate.
Yeah, he's just a crybaby!
Sometimes Morgan can be a real arse. This is one of those times.
Why? I didn't see that.
Piers is the vocal realisation and embodiment of the coarse and shouty capital-letter headlines fronting the low-brow newspapers he once edited..
Peter was speaking so long and so much but in general he's said nothing.
Last time I watch this presenter what a pointless 'interview.' I see the comments and see everyone saying he should let the man talk. Find someone who will draw in viewers who holds a position "time for peace talks" then not allow him to speak while being extremely rude. Last time for me. Seriously low quality. Peter well done for calling it out. Makes me miss Christopher all the more.
peacewithdevil
I am surprised anybody coming to this Piers monolog!!!He needs a medical attention!!!!
How I wish late christopher Hitchens was alive in these strange and crazy times
He is with his God now.
Oh, you mean the Trotsky worshipper?
Even if the war came to UK I have doubts that it is capable of fighting it considering they have gutted their military.
I'm a viewer and agree with Peter Hitchens
On what? Please elaborate? Piers asked him repeatedly what he considered would constitute appropriate terms for peace. Hitchens confessed he had no idea. Ukraine has given their conditions and Russia has not. Now, consider Russia just invaded the UK and annexed the Eastern and South Eastern part of England... would any of you lot simply roll over and cede that territory to him? I think not. Neither should Ukraine - it is a sovereign country and is recognised as such by all other nations.
@@Coconautify how is he meant to know what the price is? He said that himself. He just said peace talks should be encouraged to see what is said for a possibly of place, he never said they should should cede territory.
@@Coconautify he's right in his implication that Piers is a terrible interviewer. He never listens to what his guests have to say, always interrupts tham before they have been given half a chance to articulate their points and always seems more keen to jam his own thoughts down their throat than actually listen to them.
Piers would not let peter reply to questions, piers was constantly putting words into peters mouth and talking over him.
Typical western media journalists
Total rubbish. Hitchens made no attempt to answer any questions when he had the chance, he just repeated the same embarrassing accusations of "being talked over" as he tried to semantically dance away from the fundamental question: PM "how does this end?" PH "I don't know, I won't be there!" What a prat!
@baggycattube its a dumb question to ask how the war will end, how could someone ever predict such circumstances? Anyone with a brain can see how the question is only meant to put hitchens in an awkward position, which is not what questions are for. Another thing is that piers was constantly putting words into hitchens' mouth. He kept repeating that hitchens wanted ukrain to give up territory for russia when he never said that. Its a cheap way of arguing, not worth the hastle for an intelectual like hitch
@@baggycattube No he didn't PM was a dick just like he's always a dick.
@@danielwehbi6517 Peter was putting himself on the high moral horse by saying "I want peace". But without providing any means to get it, it is a completely vacuous statement. I want peace as well, but I have brain cells enough to recognize that it is not possible to get, as long has Russia still occupies 20% of Ukraine.
We got to stop listening to anything piers Morgan
Hitchens is the modern version neville chamberlain....
PH has been proved right over the years on all kinds of stuff - many times well after the fact and when he went out on a limb with his opinions. He’s worth listening to.
then he should start a podcast where he invites himself and no one else , then you can simp for him irrationally.
@@GorillaTVe Fool.
Ordinarily I would agree and have said so but he has a bee in his bonnet which seems to be making him irrational when it comes to dealing with Russia and Putrid - and people should start asking what it is and he should then debate that point with the authorities on the matter not some old myopic ex commie now something different intellect who is good but not omnipotent and completely wrong on the whole Ukraine affiar.
Not that Morgan gave us any opportunity to listen to him.
i did not know that P. Morgan holds such distorted views. Feel sorry for his intellect
He holds the same view as most normal thinking people would.
Zero seats! Zero seats!
Wow, hitchens is a smart one. Admits he knows nothing about the military capabilities of anyone. Doesnt know what either side would negotiate with. Doesnt know how they would do it and makenit last. But that they should negotiate. Wtf, a rare piers morgan win
He says there is currently a stalemate. That is the only time both sides might be interested in peace talks. No one is going to be interested in talks if they are currently decimating the enemy
@@glengarryglenross7127 Russia is not giving the territory back it has so far taken, and Ukraine isn't gonna give it up. So what is there to talk about?
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 maybe if there were assurances from Ukraine they they would not bomb the Russian speaking parts of Ukraine like the Donbass - then Russia maybe willing to cede territory
LOL. Well done, Piers! I've seen Peter H. bully Konstantin Kisin in a debate on this subject. He deserves to be called out on his BS. I wish his brother, Christopher, would still be with us and whoop some sense into his naive sibling.
Hitchens was completely unhinged in that Unherd debate!
Said zero bs here. Was right again. This will end when a deal is made.
@@WiseOwl_1408 if a "wise owl" tells me so, it MUST be true
Piers knows all the war machine talking points. Good boy
Russia is the invading War Machine, if Russia stops invading the war is over Einstein.
Hitchens knows all the Kremlin talking point! Wonder how much they paid him
Frustrating when the interviewer won't let the guest finish his sentence! Piers Morgan definitely likes the sound of his own voice!
One minute Hitchens mentions "peace talks" the next he says he meant "negotiations". Either way, a peace talk or a negotiation by the very literal definition implies that both sides compromise. A compromise from Ukraine = cede territory. And Hitchens says he doesn't agree they should cede territory so what the hell on earth is he talking about then?
Nobody knows...
Wondering if Piers is mandated to interrupt guest and not allow them to speak… any thoughts?
Zelensky is an evil dictator Mr Morgan you know nothing!
Lol, you Russian shills really are the lowest of the low!
I like the fact that love him, or loathe him, Morgan inspires debate. This said, he has to stop shouting people down and interrupting them constantly.
Morgan stokes controversy - mostly about issues of no real consequence like Harry and Meghan. But when it comes to issues of real consequence like lockdowns or Ukraine he just toes the official line. His supposed ‘bravery’ and ‘outspokenness’ just gets a bit tedious. Like him or not Peter Hitchens is willing to take a contrary position on things that actually matter.
@@martinmitchell7280 exactly right.
and putting words in others mouths.
nobody's was shouting
@@1francosvizzero “shouting people down” is one of those odd English language expressions. You don’t need to witness actual shouting for this turn of phrase to work.
After watching the Alex O'Connor interview and now this, I don't understand why anyone interviews this guy
It's not just the aircraft, most people don't know for every hour an aircraft flies, it takes hundreds of man hours to maintain it, on the ground plus all the spair parts
Morgan trying to set up an argument again
Things like this should be put to a vote by the people, first told the truth about what's happening and not just a one sided narrative
thats anti semitic
What’s the truth and according to whom?
@@peterk9445 jews.
russian propaganda is not truth
I have seen Piers Morgan do it loads of times , he talks over guests if they have a different view point to him, never let them explain themselves and if they do speak he twist what they said into another narrative . These people have better things to do then listen to Piers Morgans voice lol.
Hitchens couldn't explain himself because his point is nonsense.
Why did Morgan ask anybody on to his show if all he wants to do is shout his own opinion.
Stop whining and complaining Peter Hitchens and answer the question.
get on
Peter is such a child.
Go watch his interview with Alex O'Connor if you want to know how coddled this so-called intellectual really is.
It will blow your mind! I promise you that.
Peter Hitchens argues "peace negotiations" like Nixon did in his 'I want an honourable peace in Vietnam ". No substance or usable points.
There will be no need to negotiations. Russia will succeed with its intentions.
Piers' questions are simple and his guest refuses to give a straight answer.
The more I listen to it the more I know it’s a wef agent
I respect Hitchens. I do not agree with him this time around but I think he has valid points and want to learn what led him to his stance. The questions asked were valid also, but this is no way to conduct an interview or treat someone. Truly disrespectful.
Wrong brother died 😢
Piers Morgan the king of the current thing.
Piers Morgan wouldn't know the truth about the situation in Ukraine if it slapped him in the face. I would love a chat with the ignorant interviewer and put him straight on all of his 'factual' lies and falsehoods!
What truths? And cut the crap about nazis in Ukraine, NATO expansion, Minsk agreement and all the usual sh.. you shills spout all the time.
@@ThomasDanielsen1000 Yeahhhhh,,,sure late;;;;no nazis there;;;;;;;;;;; NOOOOOOOOO
@@MrLaizard You are clearly not well!
I'm beginning to really despise Piers Morgan. I have 100% respect for Peter Hitchens and always look forward to hearing his analysis of complex issues. Piers Morgan, on the other hand puts forward a question. Then, if the answer doesn't follow the popular media native then he decides to shut them down!!
Why would you have such respect for Hitchins. He's bizzarrely schizophrenic on the question. He's not stupid. He knows damn well Putin has ZERO intention of giving up conquered territory and consequently there is no reason for Ukraine to enter into peace negotiations while they are the victims of his aggression. His sensless waffling about such negitations under these circumstances seems utterly naieve and Morgan is entirely correct to press him on the issue.
Peter Hitchens is right we need peace as soon as possible.
Unfortunately his wishy washy, they must negotiate stance won't work.
He is right this conflict has history which needs to be taken into account. Russia invaded in 2014 and took some of Ukraine, they negotiated and got a temporary peace with Russia keeping what they had stolen. Then Russia came back for the rest.
The Russians must be driven back to Russia then you can negotiate - there is no other way!
These days people seem to prefer having a vehement opinion rather than a conversation. That's how wars start: lots of shouting then some fighting. Morgan seems like the kind of person who eggs them on from the sidelines without putting himself at risk: an armchair general in a tv studio whipping everybody towards ever more conflict. I can see why people find him repulsive.
How has a man in his 60s like piers morgan, who behaves like piers morgan, not suffered a beating so severe that manners and humility were the only possible outcome. Im happy to do it.
a big wagner sledgehammer to Morgan's head would be the ideal karma a toff and a ponce
He would eat you for breakfast, brunch, lunch, tea, and dinner anytime.
@@a.a.7416 his little fat legs wouldn’t be able to carry him away quick enough..
@@scottbrierley6183 Of course, Scott, of course. Why don't you challenge him to a live debate so that we can all watch your skills? Any human being with 2 hands and 10 fingers can be a genius on youtube... it's called a keyboard warrior. The guy is not my favorite anchor but only few win a debate against him, and my view is that you would not stand a chance.
@@a.a.7416 hang on i thought we were having a fight? What kind of hopskipjumpery is this?
Hitchens riding on the coattails of his brother yet again
Hitchens knows nothing on this subject.
Go Russia 🇷🇺 👏🏽
Yeh Go
Morgan should be made to send bulk of his wealth to the Ukraine.
With his earnings, he should be able to keep dozens of fighters - including his children - in the field indefinitely.
Ye England has such a great track record..in not invading countries
Usually I find myself at least partially agreeing with Hitchens. But not this time. His argument is that peace talks should happen. When asked how he thinks those talks would go, he replies “I don’t know”. He’s playing dumb, of course. Russia won’t give back their gains and Ukraine won’t give up on their land. There’s no premise on which peace talks could happen. What would need to happen first would be for the West to stop arming Ukraine, forcing it to the negotiating table with a weakened hand, and thereby, indirectly, giving Putin what he wants. Once you start thinking about the preconditions for those peace talks and how they might go, it becomes clear: Peter is effectively arguing for appeasement.
I would love to hear Peter's late brother's opinion on the war.
Type it in to Google . He was a prominent author/prolific editor and a brilliant orator.. there's lots of his material readily available and he doesn't hold back on his opinions.
@@mikethomas4423 i mean the war in Ukraine
@@TheDracarys ahhh.. i'm sure he would've foreshadowed it .
Also I hope the Hitchens mother and father had several Sons 506. Unruly to a moral, not a ideology
Piers conveniently forgets the events of 2014 in Ukraine and the US war machine
I think he remembers 2014 when Yanukovytš tried to made himself autocrat like Lukashenka and take Ukraine to same path as Belarus.. there was western support for democratic movement in Ukraine and it was right thing to do.
@@jm8kabove you are trying to convince a Russian bot, they get paid for this, my Finnish friend
Piers at his very worst
Agreed.
The Western media keeps blaming Putin for the war in Ukraine yet they don't question why MINSK AGREEMENT which was ratified by UNSC was never implemented.
Russia supported the re integration of Donbass back to Ukraine as outlined in the Minsk agreement but Ukraine never made effort to implement the same.
Unfortunately former Germany Chancellor Angela Markel confessed that Minsk agreement was never meant to be implemented.
Ohh piss off with you Minsk agreement. It was forced upon Ukraine at gunpoint after Russia invaded Ukraine for the first time in 2014.