Retire at 60 with $225,000? Understand THIS First!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @kenhart2516
    @kenhart2516 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Appreciate the scenario that is realistic for a large population. Lot of people are less than the average. By definition, half are below the median! Good presentation

    • @yourfinancialekg
      @yourfinancialekg  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks Ken! That is why we are here.

  • @robertdahl8049
    @robertdahl8049 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Thank you for making these videos for us normal people that do not have over a million at retirement . Can you make some about when we should take our 401k dispersement like monthly yearly. Thanks again

  • @asandrik3124
    @asandrik3124 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    OK a new video. I guess they have to work either full time until 65 or part time to their FRA! OK time to click play and see how I do!!! 😅

    • @yourfinancialekg
      @yourfinancialekg  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      HAHA...ok give me a better answer and I'll do it!

    • @Financefunandfitness
      @Financefunandfitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      John is not in good financial shape. I’m not bragging, I just got lucky after growing up dirt poor. I can retire now at 57 and a much better financial outlook with a government pension and free health insurance. Choices can make you or break you in life.

    • @asandrik3124
      @asandrik3124 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yourfinancialekg oh no it’s the right answer. 👍🤣
      Here’s one for you. I notice you guys generally do couples the same age or within a year of each other , how about a scenario with 5-8 years between them. That gets complicated!

  • @sammiewilliams7967
    @sammiewilliams7967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm wondering if John currently has health insurance included in the base expenses. I did not see it on the retirement planner screen. If he needs to purchase health insurance from 60 to 65 (until he reaches Medicare) in my opinion he does not have enough saved to retire at 60. Private insurance plans are very expensive. He had better take his $500 per month for entertainment/recreation to buy health insurance.
    I notice in these scenarios of early retirement planning there is often no mention of health insurance which is one of the most important considerations.

    • @Sackattack_
      @Sackattack_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ACA is very affordable from age 55-65 if your income is around 65k or less, which most people in retirement would be at, or less than that. I'm not an Obama lover, but i will admit that ACA has been a lifesaver for people who want to retire at ages pre65.

    • @bruceeigsti5274
      @bruceeigsti5274 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sackattack_ we will be getting AcA come november for me and my wife we are retiring so need it for 2 years only income is SS benefits..of $3000 and possible work PT for myself understanding income limits of $1860 a month for 2024. so wont go over that

    • @jjred233
      @jjred233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sackattack_ It was more affordable before ACA. ACA actually benefit the people who never had health insurance and were below the poverty level. It was probably less than 2 million people.

    • @Sackattack_
      @Sackattack_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jjred233 gotcha. My aca quote for me and wife with a retirement income around 65k was under $600mo vs a outside policy with blue cross being over 1k. I'm still working, so work pays half and I currently pay around 500 for a family plan. So aca is not cheaper insurance than while working, but alot better than $1000+mo. I think it helps alot of people retire earlier than they used to be able to. Having to work until age 65 so you can swap from employer insurance to Medicare, sounds depressing.

  • @chrisj302
    @chrisj302 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Appreciate the video as the majority of Americans have retirement savings in the $200k-$500k range.

  • @bruceeigsti5274
    @bruceeigsti5274 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hmm no utilities on there? no prop tax no home insurance? so is the baseline covering those expenses?

  • @mattf3348
    @mattf3348 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If you are under 65 and have less than 5ooK in savings you need to work. unless you want to starve.

    • @fasteddy3336
      @fasteddy3336 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There is a lot of information missing to make that assumption. Let’s say I have a $350,000 house that’s paid for. I have a brand new car paid for. I have $100,000 in cash. I am debt-free. These are all things that could make my retirement very easy. I can do a reverse mortgage on my house when I’m done using my Retirement savings. I would also have my Social Security and if I’m married my wife’s Social Security.

    • @Financefunandfitness
      @Financefunandfitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not unless you live in public housing

    • @aws0698
      @aws0698 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It all depends on your monthly expenses.

    • @fasteddy3336
      @fasteddy3336 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@aws0698 very true, it does depend on your monthly expenses. But if your debt-free and mortgage free it really lessons your expenses. So you have to worry about his insurance and taxes as well as maintenance items on the home. You could also find yourself a rich widow.😂😂😂

    • @johnnguyen4152
      @johnnguyen4152 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depend what is your definition of saving. If your saving is money sitting in the bank, 401K, that is not true. My house is $2.3M ( mortgage

  • @jcuadros62
    @jcuadros62 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a joke. 😂

    • @yourfinancialekg
      @yourfinancialekg  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You know a better joke? Knock knock? Or Chicken crossed the road?