Thomas Jefferson, referring to King George III: “He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating the most sacred right of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people.” No, the Revolution was not, even in part, fought to maintain slavery.
You're "reframing" out of contest. Women had more rights in 1750 in America than most women elsewhere. Hannah-Jones seems to be delusional. What a sorry excuse for a journalist. She positively drips with self-pity! Isn't it convenient to claim victimship? It releases one from acknowledging one's own failings. "Nobody wants to get over slavery like black folks". What b*&@#$t! They'll be whining for the next 400 years!
@Mr. Grrr Sir, you gave him several chances and he STILL couldn't produce anything remotely resembling an erudite response. Oh well, flaming liberals, far out in left field are notorious for dodging any real discussion. You very much did try though. Kudos.
According to the NYT, the 1619 Project was authored by "journalists" and "poets", not historians or academics. There has been strong criticism of aspects of the 1619 Project by very well respected historians and scholars like James McPherson, Gordon Wood, Victoria Bynum, and James Oakes.
Apparently you didn't read ( lazy! Probably needed a slave to read it for you) if you do your research on the 1619 you'll see the credits and research by real historians,but we gave white historians ample opportunity to write true history and they failed
Jock Larue Name the historians. There's "maybe" one on the entire project. Hannah Jones is a journalist. It's laughably absurd to say no one has written about slavery before this.
@@jocklarue9512 There are plenty of unbiased Historians maybe that's the issue. Because Historians use Facts and science and evidence that can be verified . And Generally the conclusion does not have a narrative. The 1619 project is a narrative though it maybe true . It's not History.
2:37 (about her Father) “he was one of the only Black people that flew an American flag and I was deeply embarrassed” ~ that pretty much sums up this lady’s mindset.
She just wants to play the victim card: I'm black, you have to respect me because of salvery. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
"Above all, we should bear in mind that our liberty is not an end in itself; it is a means to win respect for human dignity for all classes of our society." ―Admiral H.G. Rickover
Yes, precisely. Radical elements of the left primarily tend towards a utopian historicism. Humanity’s arrival, the end of history through a sort of gnostic religiosity/political religion of a chosen collective group overcoming/destroying the otherized collective. They abandon liberalism almost entirely And subjugate the individual to the state (or term of collectivist radical power) forgetting the ultimate minority is the individual. Accordingly concepts like individual liberty, the virtues and values necessary to prosper as liberated individuals, and the symbiosis of virtue, character and values to maintain, develop, enhance liberty. Liberty and virtue grows and feeds each other - they fracture with inertia, consistent and constant dedication to liberty is essential. Liberty is not synonymous with choice, it’s provides choice but so much more. The radicals a priori position is always a straw man misapprehension of liberty.
@@utubemewatch I think the problem is that some social justice scholars want people to think that there are only two choices to pick from: we can are either be a denier of racism or assume that racism is everywhere and the sole explanation behind highly complex human behavior. I think this is a false dichotomy: one can believe that racism exists and understand that it must be addressed without having to assume that it is omnipresent. Those who believe in the omnipresence of racism and who present the false dichotomy simultaneously want to center the archaic and mostly useless construct of race in every interaction; and by doing so they are reinforcing race-based categorizations and diluting the individual. What is the stance those of us on the 3rd group ought to take? We want to address and defeat racism, push for a more just society, but do not believe the alternatives presented by social justice scholars will yield the desired results (quite the contrary, actually). Morally, we need to speak up.
But what is her EVIDENCE that SOME colonists fought for independence in order to retain slavery? I’m not arguing the legacy of slavery. Or it’s continued relevance. As a historian, I am saying you have to have evidence for such an assertion, you can’t say that’s a reason for the fight for independence unless you have historical evidence. And how could our fight for independence be related to British abolitionism when the Brits didn’t even deal with slavery until the 1800s.
Precisely!! The British Empire abolished slavery in 1833....why would the American colonies separate from the Empire because the American Colonies wanted to retain slavery?? Slavery is EVIL but this sort of rewriting of history without providing the evidence is also an atrocity.
The Intolerable Acts was probably the biggest reason for the Revolution, but it was really just the final straw on the camels back. There was much animosity towards the Brits going all the way back to the Salem Witch Trials, where many people started to realize the Brits were just stealing land from people and executing them. They realized every deal done with Mother Britain, was a raw deal, in which the colonist would not be treated fairly. It had nothing to do with slavery. But you already knew this. I'm just venting.
“I am afraid that there is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public." - Booker T. Washington
@@thecollector6746 So the truth is Booker T Washington's widely known comment is meant to bear witness to how double-edged the intent and direct inference to white people found working ways to make money off the existence of black folk in America. This is what whites do. Tempered tolerance was practiced as a way ""nice whites" or portrayed as ''friends of blacks'' solved merchants and sharecroppers despicable work/debt relationship to keep black folk owing, but not owning. The Collector is not woke or engaged.
@@thecollector6746 how is Hannah Jones helping fix racism? How is her approach effective and how is a version of history where racism explains everything any less biased than a version of history that is whitewashed?
@@thecollector6746 You beat me to the punch Collector. Yours was my immediate first response. Instead of these easy "like" responses to Booker T. Washington, they should just tell us where she is wrong or where she is lying. They can't do that because they don't read or know history or don't like what history tells us. "Out of all our studies, history is best qualified to reward all research". - Malcolm X
Other countries dealt with their history of slavery by addressing and apologizing for it. The U.S. of course is more than a little reluctant to do anything of the sort for fear of tarnishing their "pure" origins.
@@DuncanKassel: First of all,nobody uses the term "colored" anymore---that's been out of date since the middle of last century. And black Americans do call ourselves black---I'm one of them. Since you said you're not American, you need to ask questions instead of making assumptions about us. And the "one-drop rule" was just some bullshit made up by slavemasters to separate mixed (now called biracial) black people from dark-skinned black people to create a wedge between them. I read some of the 1619 project, and you should, too---you'll learn a hell of a lot.
@@DuncanKassel - you sound very ignorant. American slavery wasn't just slavery. There was an innate hatred and racism behind it. The one drop rule is proof of this. Even after 200+ years of legalized slavery, there was still the 100 years of legalized segregation, lynchings, and institutionalized oppression. You need to educate yourself on American slavery before you start comparing it to others because I assure you, American slavery was in a class of it's own. The same laws that were used to oppress slave, continued on to oppress Blacks after slavery ended. It wasn't until 1960s - where Blacks gained legalized equality through the Civil Rights Movement. And I say "legalized" because though Blacks may currently be equal in the eyes of the law, in practice that is a different story. You need to educate yourself on these significant nuansces specific to America before running your mouth on matters you clearly know nothing about.
@@merona1546 " There was an innate hatred and racism behind it" how can you even use the word ignorant if you don't know how to speak properly?. Do you know what innate means?. If it was "innate" why didn't the English continue with the trade?, or the Germans or the French?. Where is that "innate" quality? The only reason why Africans were being bought it was because another Africans captured them to sell them to English captains in the ports of Africa (the British colonization started centuries after the slave trade materialized). The English wanted labor, and they used the Irish and anyone that was in a position of weakness (as the Romans did with them before, as did the Saxons who raped and conquered them (they became Anglo/Saxons), the Vikings raped and killed Brits too and of course the Norman French who actually the English nobility speaking Norman French for 400 years (that is truly a humiliation). The Brits were completely decimated through history. We all did). There is nothing special about slavery in America, except that i was brief and in the end they decided to live together, regardless of people like you whining, you are all Americans today. Try to look for the word "innate" before using it again, Mr. Knowledge.
It was fact checked before it was written,unlike how all of you tend to say dumb shit then learn the truth later after the damage is done,this project is pissing people off as it should,that’s what the truth does
@@leagueofotters2774 do mean like all the lies about the confederate flag, that tends to piss people off also,but you people usually make that fit your narratives for some reason
rewrite history is sinister. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
Historians spent years of training and research and would be appalled to see history being treated like tabloid fare. We've come a long way into making history a scientific profession. Don't destroy it.
Her goal was never for history. Her ultimate goal is to destroy America. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@neojon4871 FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
@@johnsarab4500 The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
WHAT?!! " . . . never dealt w/ the harm . . .never any effort to redress that harm!?" WHAT?!!! Massive "affirmative action" for 50 years; blatant UNdisguised PREFERENTIAL treatment in hiring, educational opportunities, workplace promotions, government grants, etc. Is Ms. Hannah-Jones UNaware of the large scale CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVITIES (of which I was a volunteer participant) in the 1960's? WHEN was the last time, an African American was denied anything because of their race? NOTHING positive about this. Please - let's all work, TOGETHER, for a society where EVERY PERSON is respected and valued EQUALLY. Peace.
@Tom Wlazlinski Try putting together a coherent sentence, you fucking moron. Charles is CORRECT. This country was founded as a Constitutional Republic.
@Tom Wlazlinski Holy shit you are dumb lmao, this country was definitely founded the founding fathers.... the native tribes didn't "found America" they were nomadic hunters. Just cause Native tribes were the first ones here, doesn't mean they founded the countries within them. SO dumb...
I'm 70 years old and I do understand what your father was saying. Now don't get me wrong. I have no intention of disrespecting your father but ignorance is indeed contagious. To prove my point, I have a family member who thinks all cities are in the North and all towns are in South and nothing will ever change his mind. He thinks the sun rises and sets in a white man's ass. I know it sounds crazy but he'll tell you that to your face and be proud of it...
@@josevargasrd No he's my cousin and he's just stupid. And thank you for proving my point of ignorance is contagious! So who did you contact your desease from?
@@uriahyahu7074 he didn't mean to offend you. It was a joke. Uncle Ruckus is a character from the cartoon series Boondocks. This character believes the same as your relative.
America is amazing. In less than one hundred years, we abolished the practice of slavery. In less than two hundred years, we've assured the Rights of ever cititzen, man or woman. We are one of the youngest nations, but we are the freest. I think that's beautiful.
All these people in the comments claiming that she's "rewriting" or "lying" about history have no understanding of the nuance of history as a discipline and the politics that go behind the narratives we tell. Providing truths that have previously been hidden isn't warping history. It's helping to complete our understanding of it, and that is imperative in understanding ourselves.
tell you what. you do a little research yourself , won't take a minute. just google thomas jefferson and his view of slavery. in 1772 on a committee with patrick henry and lee ( r. e.'s father) and others who petitioned the king to free all slaves in the new world ( another committee in new england did the same. the petition was rejected. this is a guy that the liberal idiots attacked in charlottesville. if you want to believe something, go ahead, don't talk about hidden truths because you want to believe lies.
bigbadbum1 tell you what, there are ways to talk to people without approaching conversation in a condescending manner you absolute ding dong. I study history and am very familiar with how Thomas Jefferson's first draft of the declaration including a condemnation of the king fit allowing the proliferation of slavery in America and other colonies. Does this past excuse him for continuing to own slaves? For having a sexual relationship with his women slaves? Or his contribution to eugenics with his pseudoscience race equation? Does the work of Robert E. Lee's father negate the fact that he owned hundreds of slaves and attempted to defer their freedom?
bigbadbum1 Acknowledging that they may have initially held anti-slavery views does not excuse the fact that, overall, they did much more to reinforce slavery on institutional levels as political figures. Do you expect me to weep for the depth of humanity Hitler showed in all his photo ops with young children? All of a few instances of good prove is that they were three dimensional people--big whoop. Don't try to turn them into models of abolitionism when the weight of history and their very own words weigh against them.
bigbadbum1 listen, I deal mostly with the reconstruction era and quite honesly am not fond of studying the revolutionary war, but you're ignoring too much lmao. Like the impact that somersett v Stewart had on slaveholder's stance on revolution--some saw it as pro slavery (not entirely true) which kept them neutral to the revolution or loyal to the British but many others saw it opening a path for the abolishment of slavery (also not entirely true) and became pro revolution. Even more important than that, the impact of British General Dunbar's proclamation that enslaved Black people could join the British side to secure their freedom? Even the bare fact that Jefferson took his initial anti-slavery passages out of the declaration? You'd have to ignore many salient aspects leading up to the American revolution to ignore the role slavery played in it.
bigbadbum1 *Google just told me that apparently the British General was named Dunmore, not Dunbar. Whoops, guess I need to brush up on my revolutionary history. By the way, I think you may want to consider doing that too. Hannah-Jones is far from the first historian to mention the importance of slavery in the revolutionary war. Since you encouraged me to do my own research and cited the most basic superficial facts, I will in turn encourage you to actuallt do an archive dive about the points I mentioned. Or, you know, just use basic reasoning to consider why Jefferson left the issue of slavery out of the declaration if he and others didn't hope to preserve it. Either way, prove you have more basis than a 9th grade American history class before daring to acuse someone else of not having an incomplete understanding of something. Good day sir 💃🏾
I’m so glad that she made sure to tell this country’s true history. So many people want to believe in the hypocrisy so they don’t have to change the way they think about America. Either you will realize it or your generations will
Weird that half the states didn’t want slavery even in 1776. A handful made slavery illegal upon declaring revolution because they saw it as a British institution. The 3/5ths comprise was fiercely argued for specifically to try to curb slavery. This woman is either lying or is completely confused.
No states abolished slavery near 1776, that is a lie. Tye 3/5th compromise was about taking away the souths voting power as they could vote FOR their slaves with 3/5ths voting power. Yes the civil war was about slavery but there is evidence that before America existed, most European countries refused to accept slavery as legal. America was in direct violation of those laws when forming a country that was built by slaves.
Interesting....some of the knowledge she is dispensing is good but I'm in need of some quick research for fact checking. She paints a beyond pathetic picture of the reality of slavery , something that many people don't want to talk about.
Yeah, I don't know why people say that. Writing history and including the stuff that has been omitted isn't rewriting anything. It's just writing history.
All History is a process of interpretation. "The Lost Cause" was a specific doctrine of historical interpretation (supported by a selected subset of facts) that was introduced by Southerners after the Civil War to benefit themselves. It has been accepted as "fact" and taught ever since. Facts by themselves do not determine history. Context, interpretation and sense-making are equally important. Anyone concerned about history being rewritten has never actually studied history. History is constantly being rewritten as new facts come to light. That's what history is.
I was born in 1953 and I met her aunt when I was a child and turns out she was an ex-slave so that means at that time we weren't that really far out of bening is she almost made it to the 1970
The goal of 1619 is quite sinister. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
This was a great interview, Trevor Noah!! Loved how you asked the questions you did as they allowed Ms. Hannah Jones to explain the narrative of her people's journey in these United States. Her boldness in confronting this will allow all Americans to revisit our history and the 'stories' being taught/told about how Africans came to the shores of these United States!!💯
Lots of comments here saying she’s lying or being revisionist without proof. Okay, can you quote passages from the book that are false, then support it with your own truthful facts of the real history. Also, the so-called historians who critiqued the book. Can you quote what they said exactly? I would love to see these, then compare it with what Nikole herself and the book have said.
She is so composed and so intelligent and so charismatic. What a delight and what an informative, engaging interview. Trevor always does a great job and has such interesting people on the show
@@vokoaxecer no trigger but nothing is disproven. Black history in America is very limited and skewed to show America in the best possible light. . History books have people believing Christopher Columbus was a great man Malcolm x was a evil man, the Confederate flag is a positive symbol, the civil war had nothing to do with slavery. Black people enjoy slavery, and contributed nothing to the country. in Texas they don't even consider the civil war a civil war it's the war of northern aggression that's what's in their actual history books. Everything I just said sadly my childrens teacher's were not aware of. When academics study and memorize a lie that's all they know. So when someone tries to show them something other than what they have been taught over the decades it's difficult if not impossible for some to see any other picture.
@@jimmyjam5453 I know. The solution to that isn't racially charged rewriting of American History to pander to a movement but a have an open dialogue like the one you and I are having.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I’m not trying to discount the awful history of slavery and racism in America, but America isn’t founded on slavery. What about Boston massacre, taxation without representation, and the intolerable acts. It was about mainly the right to decide americas own destiny as an independent nation away from the tyranny of the crown
Shadow Doc this isl why you need to read...it is explained that America had the audacity to defy Britain because of its wealth. Americans rallied up the cost and guess what guaranteed the cost and paid for the war - slavery.
@@yvette3831 america was wealthy back then. Okay. I must have missed the part where Congress couldn’t afford to pay its soldiers, people starved in valley forge, and the US navy had to steal its boats, and america had to ask for money and supplies from France
Shadow Doc we are still wealthy and let people starve suffer disease and death on our soil. War has its costs nothing is perfect but the overwhelming estimate of success was the same. Worth the risk.
@@yvette3831 you still haven’t answered the question. How can america be founded on slavery in 1619 when history tells us somethings different and Britain didn’t abolish slavery until 1833. Stop deflecting to your emotional talking points.
Just so everyone knows, her essay is filled with historical fallacies and assumptions, and was reviewed by many prominent historians that actually sent a letter against this essay. She says things like Lincoln was against black equality and chooses to leave out great black leaders and movements because they contradict the thesis. It’s unfortunate that she is praised for something that is activism based on an agenda rather than actual fact and journalism.
Salim Sivaad I acknowledge that yes, Lincoln was a product of his time which was a racist society. However, he was nonetheless a vital player on the road to racial equality in America and his views evolved as he spent more time with figures like Frederick Douglass. He was not perfect, but he was a transformational leader for his time and believed that African Americans should be held to the same rights detailed in the constitution, and he eventually directly contradicted his remarks from 1958.
Salim Sivaad three days before he died he expressed support for black political rights. As I said his views evolved over time and we always tend to look at history through the eyes of the present. Yes he held racist views during his life. But he opposed slavery since the beginning of his life and his views continued to evolve. He would have continued to evolve had he not died so suddenly. I’m not saying the man was perfect but he was a pivotal step in achieving black equality and to say that he was against eventual black equality is not true. He was the one who chose to make the war about slavery and it was him that forced through the 13th amendment. These are also facts that are well documented.
Salim Sivaad so he is not to be credited if he changes over time? He is to be beholden to his earlier views? He did hold all of these views at one point but he changed over time. He did initially believe in colonization but relented and supported citizenship for black people. He wasn’t as advanced as some of his compatriots like Thaddeus Stevens. But you make gains one step at a time in a divided congress and country and that’s what Lincoln was doing. Hell if he was such a racist why would Obama launch his campaign in Springfield and be sworn in on Lincoln’s Bible? Nikole says that we declared independence to keep slaves which is not true. If you won’t take my word for this, then look into the letter that 5 of this country’s most renowned historical scholars have sent detailing the inaccuracies in the 1619 project.
@Salim Sivaad Lincoln was a racist slave owner, the civil war was never faught over freeing slaves, it was faught to prevent succession from Tyranny again. He established a more power federal government and linked it to the banking system. Her analysis put slaves as this high role in economic activity which is fairly not true. Sure Southern states had more slave activity but the North was highly more productive in terms of technological advancement. And they didn't have much slavery, they were normal businesses and to put slavery at the centerfold is disingenuous to real historical context. It's simply propaganda to promote a political agenda against capitalism which we do not have. America is Fascist corporatism sponsored by the state, and people vote in these oppressors and fight over manufactured hate. I was under the impression that racism was dead the media sure seems to divide people, maybe that's why i feel that way. I choose not to watch the brainwashing box.
Tom Wlazlinski what made you think I support Donald trump because I don’t. As for the crimes against humanity I’m curious as to what he did that was so bad. And insulting my intelligence isn’t really a good argument to make. I wish you the best in figuring out all the problems you have because you seem like a very angry person.
Maybe she should write a book called 2022 and she could talk about how Africa still has slaves to this day. I'm just saying, that might be a better place to focus your rage on.
We’re not talking about Africa. She doesn’t live there nor has she ever. She’s talking about the US, where black Americans were enslaved. Stay on topic.
@MMTLP-JON Stay on subject. Let's get our house in order, first. Then, we can move on to help people or countries that never said that, "All men are created equal or We the people.." But, you keep trying!!
Do you know why they want to rewrite history? The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
That is crazy. Taxation without representation is absolute in history. Read the letters sent to King George. England was still practicing slavery in 1830, as was the rest of the world. The revolution was not fought for slavery, nobody was threatening the institution of slavery at that time. You cannot rewrite history based on a single race, otherwise, why was America not started by the Native Americans, which is my family tree. Or why aren’t we discussing the Ottoman Empire having historical written record as the founding of Greece and Romania? History should be adjusted with new better information, not rewritten with no historical evidence, or backing from historians (black, white, native, not just white disagree) and taught as truth to school children.
1619's goal is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I would appreciate it deeply if someone here in this comment section would be so kind as to explain to me how this project is revisionist history? What particular details about the project are historically false?
part of 1619 project is to portrait revolutionary war as if it was about "slavery", but it was not. they are doing that because they want to promote sense of entitlement to the black people. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I see you like to use a lot of scary words like "socialism" and "communism" to describe just about anything you think is just a little too progressive. I'm not saying I support the 1619 project but I don't think the people involved with it have any ill-intentions. In fact, contrary to what you said I think the project seeks to reduce resentment between blacks and whites, not exacerbate it. I don't think the 1619 project is trying to put black people at the center of American history, it's just trying to be more inclusive and make black people feel apart of the American story as much as white people.
@@60LifeRedefined I did. Severs times I believed it. Then I was presented with facts that disproves much of it now I really wonder what the motives are. It really feels like it is to keep Black Americans enslaved mentally.
Basically all of it. It's pure ideology. It's a complete re-write of history from a bIack supremacist perspective. Mind you, that this project was not done by journalists and historians, but by racist activists.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, EVERY DATE HAS BENN ALTERED. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the (Democrat) Party is always right.” - George Orwell, “1984”
“The American Revolution was fought in order to maintain slavery”- Future History Books written by Nicole Hannah Jones, after all monuments of Washington, Jefferson, Grant, and every other president are torn down (which she condoned). After all, even if you were a white man present during slavery, you were complicit in slavery (even if your work laid the foundation for its abolition or you directly fought against it like Grant) and if you lived during Jim Crow you were complicit in that, and if you were alive during the era of microagressions you were complicit in that. Any history that portrays any European descendants or their culture or struggles in America favorably is white supremacist wrongthink and must be dismantled.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
This is what so insulting about these types of ideologues. If you're going to go back to the start of slavery, why start there? This land already belonged to the natives for centuries before Europeans discovered it. Don't they count?
Don't get bought in, by the 1619 project. 1619 wants to enslave everyone. 1619's goal is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@tommymahon8939 the white man embraced it and kept it going for years. From the moment they came to this country let's not forget what happened to the indigenous people that indured the white man's wrath, oh yeah but y'all try to white wash that too.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
she made half of it up. Even the idea that 1619 was the start of slavery in the US was a lie. They were indentured servants, meaning that while their contracts were bought and sold, they would be free citizens once that contract was up.
@@andimom2010 FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
What she says about black people fostering their freedom is really only partially true. In Massachusetts, starting with Quock Walker, slaves could sue for their freedom citing "all men are created equal" and Christianity, and all of them who tried succeeded in their freedom even though slavery was still legal. HOWEVER, she ignores that juries were comprised of WHITE people who looked within themselves and deemed slavery immoral EVERY time it was brought to court. I only point this out because we shouldn't look at history as which group did what as an exclusive thing. History is dynamic. Multiple groups of people contributed to everything in their own way. We don't need to overcorrect to say black people actually exclusively did this thing or the other. Although it shouldn't matter, no I'm not white. I'm brown.
Wow as a libertarian/conservative I love learning about history, I knew growing up learning about the constitution and that the founding fathers some owned slaves, that part always struck a nerve with me, I love hearing truth no matter where it comes from! Great interview and information!
This 1619 project has been criticized by a lot of historians for its inaccuracies try looking up the American revolution your self and America in general. She has a very big bias
This is a terrible interview, and daily show is a propaganda machine of the ultra left. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Great interview and I love how she answered these common yet annoying questions about why this part of American history matters. Slavery is truly part of the foundation and once that is acknowledged then the U.S. can move forward instead of remaining stagnant in its cultural evolution.
Now that the dems are finally through sucking up all the oxygen out the room with Trump’s impeachment, instead of getting back to the Reparations discussion/resolution they are back discussing immigration... (sigh) ... THANK YOU so MUCH for this Trevor! 🙏🏽 Great work Nikole Hannah-Jones, and Great interview guys! 🙏🏽❤️ #ReparationsNow #BlackAgenda2020 #NoReparationsNoVote !
reparations: if you family lineage has been here for 150+ years and you can prove your ancestors were in fact brought here on slave ships. No income tax, no property tax, and free college. That might help out some people 🍻
I'm a White male, late 60's, raised in a Conservative home in the South. While I disagree with some things that Nikole Hannah-Jones said, overall I agree with her. It is a fact of human psychology that, if you do not affectively deal with trauma, that trauma will be passed to future generations. This is being found in children who were sexually assaulted, we're finding this to be true in the family of veterans, research has found that some pregnant women passed their 9/11 trauma onto their unborn children, The various Black tribes were stripped of their language, culture, religion, dignity; the violence on them was a horrific experience that Whites cannot even begin to appreciate. The conversation around the 1619 Project is a way of dealing with this cultural trauma. The 1619 Project is not intended to make people feel badly about themselves. The intent is to start a more honest conversation and that I support.
Slavery. Indentured Servitude. Low cost labor pool. For-profit-prisons. Military Service. Student Debt. Racism. Slavery hasn't gone anywhere. The 1% is, as usual, the richest and most powerful and the rest of us just power the machinery that ultimately brings them their wealth. Americans must not be very good negotiators. Other nations may pay more in taxes but what they receive in return is something that American Society is expected to live without - you know - like universal health care which improved the lives of every citizen IN those nations and campaign finance reform which strengthened their democracies. Reject the 2010 Citizens United decision.
only because the greedy sick fks in charge of things have convinced the greedy stupid fks not in charge of anything, that capitalism (basically a dog eat dog system) is the best way to develop a strong stable society with a level playing field for all.
Slavery were never the issue of 1619 Well there is a political agenda behind it. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
This is a misnomer. The first African slaves brought to what is now the United States was brought over years before 1619 and it were the Spanish, not the English, who introduced slavery to North America.
@Major Henry L. But the ones who were brought over here from Africa, were not Africans, they were Hebrew-Israelites, who escaped to Western Africa, fleeing from the Roman soldiers. The reason 1619 is significant, is because time for the Israelites slavery began then. They were to be enslaved, according to Genesis 15:13, for four-hundred years (400), the time God set for them because of their disobedience. President Donald Trump, signed Bill HR 1242 recognizing the end of God's term for the Israelites. Whatever hap- pens, know this people, it's getting ready to '''''''RAIN, and REIGN,'''''''' There was an old hymn my grandmother used to sing (her mother was a slave), named, ''''We'll understand it better, bye, and bye.'''' Not now, but, Bye, and Bye. When? Bye and Bye! Bye, and Bye, is almost here Repent, for your redemption draweth nigh!!
It is indeed made and intended to rile people up. The unfortunate thing is that neither side realizes that it is purposely directed at them. We all keep being presented the "truth" as false dichotomies that are usually inversions of one another's. Subversively clear with the date chosen one a six one a nine. Why not any date in-between Columbus and now? The hypocrisy is, I speculate and fear, is that she knows the division this creates and is only a face of sinister collective. I have no enemies. Especially inherited ones. The truth and the way is not revealed through resentment Norwood It Foster so much.
I first encountered Nikole Hannah-Jones on This American Life. MacArthur Foundation gave their award to an actual genius this time. Hard working, voracious researching, fearless and no shit-taking. Thank you for giving us tools to fight the system.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@danielslack9201 Isn’t it your bedtime. Maybe argue with your mom instead of arguing with this 70 y/o woman. Not really interested in having a convo with you.
@@djm2516 And yet your comment is twice as long.....Take your ccp trash someplace else! Stop telling people to go to hell because they dont agree with you!
Her thought process and suggestions unintentionally will drive away from racial equilibrium. Good luck America. Land of tribes instead of land of Americans.
@@darrengray1569 I mean like do you regularly practice this immediate skepticism towards books with as much evidence and vetting from historians and scholars as 1619? Or just books you don't want to believe are true.
That's her goal... The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
If you want to get technical slavery never ended and still legal continues in America. They ended private slavery but states are allowed to keep criminals as slaves which imo criminal or not no human should be enslaved.
I'm Norwegian and my ancestors came to America in the 1870's. Should I pay reparations to the Celtic people (Germans) since we enslaved them from 800 AD to 1100 AD?
@@taurtue Yeah, but so do the black ancestors of African Americans who still live in Africa. In fact, they are still enslaving people. So should African Americans, who are ancestors of these slavers, pay reparations. What about you? Do you have a great grandpa or great great grandpa who might have killed someone? Should you pay reparations to their ancestors?
Man........ I'm shocked that they have her on here. Things are going to get interested going forward. I was already familiar with this project going forward. It's filled with horrific atrocities against Black People.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
One question...why would the American colonies break away from Britain in 1776 to maintain slavery, when Britain had not outlawed slavery yet until 1833? Were the British gradually adding restrictions to phase slavery out, that made the colonies think they would eventually be forced to give slavery up?
Oh, I guess the British had ended slavery "in Britain itself" in 1772 but not in the British empire and colonies, and that made the southern US colonies nervous that they would be next?
wait so, 1619 is trying to look at another point of view of history that wasn’t really addressed with the hope that the education behind looking at that side of history will spark conversations and lead people to address the lack of educational coverage schools have for slavery and the impact of it? if that’s the case then where’s the issue?
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Left wing Marxist piece aimed at saying everything from accounting to the industrial revolution to Microsoft today rose out of slavery. I would say read the whole project for yourself. It is not unbiased
I don't understand the idea that most of us weren't aware of the hypocrisy or the atrocities of our founders and our founding as a whole. We've all been well aware of that for a long long time...I think the point that is missing is you can't just discount the fact that without the actions of our founders our country would be in a very different place today...I don't know what kind of place but definitely different lol. The point is people hold the founders in such a high esteem because whether you liked them or not they are men that changed the course of our country's history. I'm all for giving a more complete history especially to our kids...some of these text books are a joke. But you can't do that with sentiment, it has to be undesputed historical fact...that is where the 1619 project has failed too many holes she needs a team of scholars to come out with something more tangible...but I do like the general idea of it
She's just a tool for the left. "and she doesn't know it". Well there is a political agenda behind it. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Yes, we all want to believe we are pure and our shit don't stink. Thank you for telling these truths and for presenting history in a way that is relatable too. What do we do about it today? What do we do with the information? As a middle-aged white woman, I always do my best to learn as much as possible so I can vote intelligently. In my city, which has a sick history of racism, many black people don't seek out information and they don't vote at all. I never thought about how, when the constitution was written, so many diverse populations were not free or not allowed to vote or participate in democracy. But, now that they can, many still don't. How do we get people, and especially those most effected by policies, to participate, to seek the information about history, to have civil conversations and to vote?
Amy This is the results of unchecked white supremacy and greed. If large influxes of uncorrupted history, knowledge, media, wealth and unity were to circulate within the indigenous black cultures, communities and tribes spreaded out across the world (panafricanism) and stop existing under this hypnosis of pseudo-indoctrinations that surround us everyday for the past 400+ years, the potential and power of the coalition of a black empire would easily dismantle neo-colonialism. We need to think like a nation not a plantation and act as one people to return to our former Afro-equilibrium and glorified lost estate of resources, healing arts, medicine, science, technology, and spiritual homeostasis beyond the records of slavery.
Please don't try to convince people to vote in our elections. Our politics is corrupt, so why bother? Our country is so structurally fractured that you cannot vote without preventing corruption from ensuing: understand that.
You know, as I am hearing about t his bogus view of American History, I can't help, since this is June, thinking about June 1944. An American General, Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, while getting ready to launch the Allied forces on the Continent of Europe, he carried on his shoulders the weight of the entire war effort. On his word America and much of Western Europe was either going to survive or die. The lives of hundreds of thousands of troops rested upon the command to go. If he made the wrong decision or if his plan was off just a little, the future of America rested with him. He carried a burden that most men will never know, but he knew what had to be done. And one better,, prior to the go order he composed a memo in which he states the full responsibility failure, if it failed was his. I don't think that any country based as you claim, and sewn in the seeds of slavery would produce a man like this. Everything that America has accomplished in its history was to liberate people just as our ancestors liberated the slaves in 1865. This whole idea id bogus, this is the greatest country on earth and your premise is totally wrong. By the way, that same General Eisenhower was, years later the first American President to enforce an order of the Supreme Court regarding desegregation when he had the military in Little Rock ensure the ability for black students to attend the white high school.
With every interview/show I view, the Brilliance of God Shines upon you, Trevor. You are truly a Gifted interviewer, and God has Placed you here/there for a reason. You are relatable, and you are doing this job with heart💕💕 I am Forever a fan/supporter🙏
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
‘Give America a Break.’ ‘Instead of trying to Break it.’ - Please Give a 👍 If you agree with ‘Debunking’ such hokum that this lady learned in a class she attended, (This is the FIRST TIME that I’ve ever asked for a response. And Thank you). Stay safe, Stay well. (Mentally & Physically). I realize that it hasn’t been easy. Maybe Americans can change this ‘Re-Racism.’ But, I doubt anyone that carries around so much hatred can be detoured easily. It’s just ‘So Mental.’ I almost feel ‘Sorry’ for this Nikole H. Jones. Maybe she’ll find healing, but, I doubt it.
Olivia G. Nobody can make anybody else like each other. It doesn’t work that way. If you’re a hater, That’s not my problem. I was raised to love everybody around me. Don’t blame me because others have mental issues. I’ve got enough to worry about putting food on my plate.
@@augustrush7538 lol, I agree with you. We don’t have to agree or like everyone around us. I just didn’t agree, that’s why you got the 👎🏾. It’s that simple, no malice behind it.
@Olivia G, Answer this one question, why would my mother teach me that if you’re not part of the solution, you must be part of the problem. Recently, even Bill Gates admitted to being part of the climate problem. Many of the individuals that are screaming ‘Green’- Are the worst polluters on the Earth.
IF and this is a BIG IF, our people would READ our BIBLES with OPEN hearts, especially Deuteronomy 28, we would realize that our struggles for equality and freedom ARE SPIRITUAL not racial, economical...when WE as a people turn from idolatry and worship and OBEY the Creator of heaven and earth...then and only then we WILL be free, until then we will continue to struggle and talk about racism...
Yeah taxation on 138 slaves .. they fought to keep their property (black people) tax down and they were tired of people telling them what to do and having dominion over them …
Just a heads up. All of this is false. One thing that jumped out to me is that Thomas Jefferson never wrote “we hold these truths to be self evident” he actually wrote “we hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable” Ben Franklin didn’t like that and changed it to “self evident”. It’s the little things like that which shoe she did not do very good research AT ALL.
Her goal is to destroy America. to enslave everyone. The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Love that Trevor is able to see it from the "outside" and can ask questions that we Americans are too embarrassed to ask. Could it be that the Reconciliation Panels dealt with responsibility of action in South Africa (Germany, you too) brings a richer conversation? It's time we Americans grow up and have the adult conversations that are screaming to be had. Not just "racial", "caste" as well.
The moment Nikole Hannah-Jones appeared on this show, we knew she has no credibility. Thank you, Trevor Noah, for once again showing us two things: "The 1619 Porject" is social Marxist revisionism crap.. and that that "periodical" DESERVES to be called The New York Slimes.
@@Ubermensch9240 what do you think this is leading to? Do you genuinely believe it's just to spread supposed "truths" to the masses and let that widespread knowledge end with the awareness? Or that there is a financial gain at the end of the line..... take your time...
Don't want to burst your bubble but if you really want to get technical the first settlement in the U.S. was St Augustine, FL. So let's talk about the 1565 project. This is over 60 years ahead of your vaunted 1619. These were people seeking freedom. They left the inquisition in their rear view. I doubt they had slavery on the mind.
If you want to be historically accurate, Florida was not one of the original 13 colonies. It was still a Spanish settlement in the 16th century (e.g., 1565).
@@kipwonder2233 Yes you are absolutely correct. I can't remember if that was a part of the Louisiana Purchase. Regardless, it was not one of the 13 colonies. Still, it was older than VA.
@@WMJCPA 1619 was the year when the British people, who would become the United States, first introduced slaves to the 13 colonies. The British, and the 'tyranny' of King George...as opposed to Spain...being who the United States won our freedom from. The United States didn't purchase Florida until 2/22/1819...200 years after 1619. Also...technically...St. Augustine was established to eliminate the threat of the French...who had established an outpost near what would become St. Augustine.
@@kipwonder2233 I understand. I was only commenting that the British were not the first people to come here. I was off on the purchase of Florida, I thought it occurred as part of the Louisiana purchase.. I thank you for clarifying that for me. I remember learning about the slaves that came here in 1619, but since these were indentured to the British that were settling in Virginia, ow can one make the claim that these slaves had anything to do with American slavery? I also recall, that many of these initial so called slaves, were in fact indentured servants who were working off some sort of debt or other obligation to the people who brought them in. Remember, back then in England they had such a thing as debtors prisons. A person indebted to another cold be sent to prison if they could not honor the obligation. Indentured servitude was a way to work off that debt hence avoiding the debtor's prison. In any case, I don't see how this can count as the birth of a nation, it sounds more like a travelogue brochure.
@@WMJCPA I understand your confusion. You have not read...and have absolutely NO idea of what The 1619 Project ACTUALLY contains. Or else you'd know that Nikole Hannah-Jones was referencing The White Lion...which is easily Googled for reference. You're simply one more person who believes they're smarter than a MacArthur Genius Grant recipient. Fascinating🤦.
Just yesterday I was explaining how slavery has affected the modern people to a white man who declared that he wasn't angry at the English for what happened - as if the British had any real effect on us today.
nicholas schoonbeck .... I hear you. So many people don’t have the ability to think critically or conceptually. I don’t think all Americans are in denial or purposefully ignorant. How do we bring all people on to the same page?
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism. And destroy conservatism. For example, reparations for Black American: 1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar. If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power. 1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America. Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage. Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries? No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Nikole Hannah-Jones is a brave, dedicated woman. She continues to speak her truth and do her work no matter what the haters say about her. Love you, Nikole. ♥️☺️
![ค้าง (STILL) - GEMINI [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ftxx3hk5vkU/mqdefault.jpg)
Thomas Jefferson, referring to King George III: “He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating
the most sacred right of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people.”
No, the Revolution was not, even in part, fought to maintain slavery.
Thomas Jefferson always said that gods wrath would fall upon the nation for allowing slavery to continue
You're "reframing" out of contest. Women had more rights in 1750 in America than most women elsewhere.
Hannah-Jones seems to be delusional. What a sorry excuse for a journalist. She positively drips with self-pity!
Isn't it convenient to claim victimship? It releases one from acknowledging one's own failings.
"Nobody wants to get over slavery like black folks". What b*&@#$t!
They'll be whining for the next 400 years!
Well said!
@Mr. Grrr I'm not sure DW would know how to navigate a dictionary judging by his erudite statements. Wouldn't you agree?
BTW: Love your comebacks!
@Mr. Grrr Sir, you gave him several chances and he STILL couldn't produce anything remotely resembling an erudite response. Oh well, flaming liberals, far out in left field are notorious for dodging any real discussion. You very much did try though. Kudos.
According to the NYT, the 1619 Project was authored by "journalists" and "poets", not historians or academics. There has been strong criticism of aspects of the 1619 Project by very well respected historians and scholars like James McPherson, Gordon Wood, Victoria Bynum, and James Oakes.
Apparently you didn't read ( lazy! Probably needed a slave to read it for you) if you do your research on the 1619 you'll see the credits and research by real historians,but we gave white historians ample opportunity to write true history and they failed
Jock Larue Name the historians. There's "maybe" one on the entire project. Hannah Jones is a journalist. It's laughably absurd to say no one has written about slavery before this.
Also the historian who contributed on the project rejected the main thesis made. Hard to say it is a historical piece
Tyler Kaye And now, Little Miss 1619 herself, Hannah Jones, is saying it's not history at all, but journalism!
@@jocklarue9512 There are plenty of unbiased Historians maybe that's the issue. Because Historians use Facts and science and evidence that can be verified . And Generally the conclusion does not have a narrative. The 1619 project is a narrative though it maybe true . It's not History.
2:37 (about her Father) “he was one of the only Black people that flew an American flag and I was deeply embarrassed” ~ that pretty much sums up this lady’s mindset.
U must not have heard her next line
@@jaybranch6323 thank you.....she said she was young and didnt understand.
Her father could not vote in the south
She then said she grew to understand why he did
She just wants to play the victim card: I'm black, you have to respect me because of salvery.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
"Above all, we should bear in mind that our liberty is not an end in itself; it is a means to win respect for human dignity for all classes of our society."
―Admiral H.G. Rickover
Yes, precisely. Radical elements of the left primarily tend towards a utopian historicism. Humanity’s arrival, the end of history through a sort of gnostic religiosity/political religion of a chosen collective group overcoming/destroying the otherized collective. They abandon liberalism almost entirely And subjugate the individual to the state (or term of collectivist radical power) forgetting the ultimate minority is the individual. Accordingly concepts like individual liberty, the virtues and values necessary to prosper as liberated individuals, and the symbiosis of virtue, character and values to maintain, develop, enhance liberty. Liberty and virtue grows and feeds each other - they fracture with inertia, consistent and constant dedication to liberty is essential. Liberty is not synonymous with choice, it’s provides choice but so much more. The radicals a priori position is always a straw man misapprehension of liberty.
@@utubemewatch That's an utterly contradictory wall of text.
@@utubemewatch Why is it that you folks that know the least insist on saying so much and giving your ignorance away?
@@Dan-ud8hz Exactly. Word salad👎
@@utubemewatch I think the problem is that some social justice scholars want people to think that there are only two choices to pick from: we can are either be a denier of racism or assume that racism is everywhere and the sole explanation behind highly complex human behavior. I think this is a false dichotomy: one can believe that racism exists and understand that it must be addressed without having to assume that it is omnipresent. Those who believe in the omnipresence of racism and who present the false dichotomy simultaneously want to center the archaic and mostly useless construct of race in every interaction; and by doing so they are reinforcing race-based categorizations and diluting the individual. What is the stance those of us on the 3rd group ought to take? We want to address and defeat racism, push for a more just society, but do not believe the alternatives presented by social justice scholars will yield the desired results (quite the contrary, actually). Morally, we need to speak up.
If I’m half white/black should I pay pay reparations to myself?
I was wondering how they going to answer this issue... also how do they know all whites were slavers? and what aboout the northern ones?
Adrián They weren’t. Only a small percentage held slaves. Also, there were black slave owners.
@@thadoc5186 true
Thank you i have 4 or 5 nationalities so I pay myself 4 times. HELP
I have 4 or 5 nationalities so do i pay the black in me 4 times. HELP
But what is her EVIDENCE that SOME colonists fought for independence in order to retain slavery? I’m not arguing the legacy of slavery. Or it’s continued relevance. As a historian, I am saying you have to have evidence for such an assertion, you can’t say that’s a reason for the fight for independence unless you have historical evidence.
And how could our fight for independence be related to British abolitionism when the Brits didn’t even deal with slavery until the 1800s.
Precisely!! The British Empire abolished slavery in 1833....why would the American colonies separate from the Empire because the American Colonies wanted to retain slavery?? Slavery is EVIL but this sort of rewriting of history without providing the evidence is also an atrocity.
1776 Project. Check it out th-cam.com/video/DFQmh_plRi8/w-d-xo.html
As a fellow historian sometimes you don't even need evidence to prove that this entire project is fucking stupid.
Jantz Fitzgerald Kind of like when white people tell their history.
The Intolerable Acts was probably the biggest reason for the Revolution, but it was really just the final straw on the camels back. There was much animosity towards the Brits going all the way back to the Salem Witch Trials, where many people started to realize the Brits were just stealing land from people and executing them. They realized every deal done with Mother Britain, was a raw deal, in which the colonist would not be treated fairly. It had nothing to do with slavery. But you already knew this. I'm just venting.
“I am afraid that there is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public." - Booker T. Washington
...or alternatively and far more likely its people like you who offer nonsense like this to diminish the work of people like this woman.
@@thecollector6746 So the truth is Booker T Washington's widely known comment is meant to bear witness to how double-edged the intent and direct inference to white people found working ways to make money off the existence of black folk in America. This is what whites do. Tempered tolerance was practiced as a way ""nice whites" or portrayed as ''friends of blacks'' solved merchants and sharecroppers despicable work/debt
relationship to keep black folk owing, but not owning. The Collector is not woke or engaged.
Reparations now! that would be one step of healing
@@thecollector6746 how is Hannah Jones helping fix racism? How is her approach effective and how is a version of history where racism explains everything any less biased than a version of history that is whitewashed?
@@thecollector6746 You beat me to the punch Collector. Yours was my immediate first response. Instead of these easy "like" responses to Booker T. Washington, they should just tell us where she is wrong or where she is lying. They can't do that because they don't read or know history or don't like what history tells us.
"Out of all our studies, history is best qualified to reward all research".
- Malcolm X
Other countries dealt with their history of slavery by addressing and apologizing for it. The U.S. of course is more than a little reluctant to do anything of the sort for fear of tarnishing their "pure" origins.
@@DuncanKassel you are the perfect example of America that addressed or apologized for slavery
Wish Trevor will get some A Listers as guests.Never know these people.
@@DuncanKassel:
First of all,nobody uses the term "colored" anymore---that's been out of date since the middle of last century. And black Americans do call ourselves black---I'm one of them. Since you said you're not American, you need to ask questions instead of making assumptions about us. And the "one-drop rule" was just some bullshit made up by slavemasters to separate mixed (now called biracial) black people from dark-skinned black people to create a wedge between them. I read some of the 1619 project, and you should, too---you'll learn a hell of a lot.
@@DuncanKassel - you sound very ignorant. American slavery wasn't just slavery. There was an innate hatred and racism behind it. The one drop rule is proof of this. Even after 200+ years of legalized slavery, there was still the 100 years of legalized segregation, lynchings, and institutionalized oppression. You need to educate yourself on American slavery before you start comparing it to others because I assure you, American slavery was in a class of it's own. The same laws that were used to oppress slave, continued on to oppress Blacks after slavery ended. It wasn't until 1960s - where Blacks gained legalized equality through the Civil Rights Movement. And I say "legalized" because though Blacks may currently be equal in the eyes of the law, in practice that is a different story. You need to educate yourself on these significant nuansces specific to America before running your mouth on matters you clearly know nothing about.
@@merona1546 " There was an innate hatred and racism behind it" how can you even use the word ignorant if you don't know how to speak properly?.
Do you know what innate means?.
If it was "innate" why didn't the English continue with the trade?, or the Germans or the French?. Where is that "innate" quality?
The only reason why Africans were being bought it was because another Africans captured them to sell them to English captains in the ports of Africa (the British colonization started centuries after the slave trade materialized).
The English wanted labor, and they used the Irish and anyone that was in a position of weakness (as the Romans did with them before, as did the Saxons who raped and conquered them (they became Anglo/Saxons), the Vikings raped and killed Brits too and of course the Norman French who actually the English nobility speaking Norman French for 400 years (that is truly a humiliation). The Brits were completely decimated through history. We all did).
There is nothing special about slavery in America, except that i was brief and in the end they decided to live together, regardless of people like you whining, you are all Americans today.
Try to look for the word "innate" before using it again, Mr. Knowledge.
I wonder if the right, left or on honest non partisan comity did a fact check on the 1619 new re-right of history.
That wouldn't be politically expedient.
It was fact checked before it was written,unlike how all of you tend to say dumb shit then learn the truth later after the damage is done,this project is pissing people off as it should,that’s what the truth does
Anything starting with the word "imagine" is pure fiction. Shame that the Pulitzer is now given for pure propaganda garbage.
@@kreshawnjackson5382 Who fact checked it? I guess I agree when that left fact checks it self. Enjoy the power.
@@leagueofotters2774 do mean like all the lies about the confederate flag, that tends to piss people off also,but you people usually make that fit your narratives for some reason
"Reframing" is another word for "re-writing history."
rewrite history is sinister.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
Correcting history
Historians spent years of training and research and would be appalled to see history being treated like tabloid fare. We've come a long way into making history a scientific profession. Don't destroy it.
Her goal was never for history. Her ultimate goal is to destroy America.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@neojon4871 FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past."
A PORTION OF THE 10% WHO ARE BLACK WANT TO TAKE OVER.
God and God only!!!!!!
@@johnsarab4500 The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@Omar Hasanovic Hahaha
Like essentially nobody reads or cares about history very much...so...no
WHAT?!! " . . . never dealt w/ the harm . . .never any effort to redress that harm!?" WHAT?!!! Massive "affirmative action" for 50 years; blatant UNdisguised PREFERENTIAL treatment in hiring, educational opportunities, workplace promotions, government grants, etc. Is Ms. Hannah-Jones UNaware of the large scale CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVITIES (of which I was a volunteer participant) in the 1960's? WHEN was the last time, an African American was denied anything because of their race? NOTHING positive about this. Please - let's all work, TOGETHER, for a society where EVERY PERSON is respected and valued EQUALLY. Peace.
Gotta salute this black queen!! Stay up sista!!
Search : ' Jews Behind Slavery '
@Dave Hanson
Search : ' How Israel Treat Black People '
@@roysmith3767 treats*
@@DarthVader1977 Either way . CK both
@Good Shepherd English teachers around the world are silently weeping....😢
Slavery haven’t ended, look who is lock up in these jails, this country is still getting free labor
So criminals shouldn't be punished according to their crimes?
@YHWH*JUDGES*BABYLON:
Hell, yeah---loved hearing this, because I love reading about history, and how things got to be the way they are today.
Kirk Wood wow, my comment on this comment was censored. Thanks google.
Sakeenah Auto Solutions no they shouldn’t be punished if they were set up and entrapped by law enforcement,,and I know for a fact
Sakeenah Auto Solutions everybody in jail are not criminal, you had better hope and pray you never get set up by law enforcement
this country was founded as constitutional republic not a democratic republic
@Tom Wlazlinski Try putting together a coherent sentence, you fucking moron.
Charles is CORRECT.
This country was founded as a Constitutional Republic.
@Tom Wlazlinski Holy shit you are dumb lmao, this country was definitely founded the founding fathers.... the native tribes didn't "found America" they were nomadic hunters. Just cause Native tribes were the first ones here, doesn't mean they founded the countries within them. SO dumb...
My dad, born Canadian of ½ US descent, a naturalized US Citizen and Korean War Vet, felt and taught me the same as what her dad expressed.
I'm 70 years old and I do understand what your father was saying.
Now don't get me wrong.
I have no intention of disrespecting your father but ignorance is indeed contagious.
To prove my point,
I have a family member who thinks all cities are in the North and all towns are in South and nothing will ever change his mind.
He thinks the sun rises and sets in a white man's ass.
I know it sounds crazy but he'll tell you that to your face and be proud of it...
@@uriahyahu7074 it's your uncle? Also, is his name ruckus
@@josevargasrd
No he's my cousin and he's just stupid.
And thank you for proving my point of ignorance is contagious!
So who did you contact your desease from?
Search : ' Jews Behind Slavery
@@uriahyahu7074 he didn't mean to offend you. It was a joke. Uncle Ruckus is a character from the cartoon series Boondocks. This character believes the same as your relative.
America is amazing. In less than one hundred years, we abolished the practice of slavery. In less than two hundred years, we've assured the Rights of ever cititzen, man or woman. We are one of the youngest nations, but we are the freest. I think that's beautiful.
All these people in the comments claiming that she's "rewriting" or "lying" about history have no understanding of the nuance of history as a discipline and the politics that go behind the narratives we tell. Providing truths that have previously been hidden isn't warping history. It's helping to complete our understanding of it, and that is imperative in understanding ourselves.
tell you what. you do a little research yourself , won't take a minute. just google thomas jefferson and his view of slavery. in 1772 on a committee with patrick henry and lee ( r. e.'s father) and others who petitioned the king to free all slaves in the new world ( another committee in new england did the same. the petition was rejected. this is a guy that the liberal idiots attacked in charlottesville. if you want to believe something, go ahead, don't talk about hidden truths because you want to believe lies.
bigbadbum1 tell you what, there are ways to talk to people without approaching conversation in a condescending manner you absolute ding dong. I study history and am very familiar with how Thomas Jefferson's first draft of the declaration including a condemnation of the king fit allowing the proliferation of slavery in America and other colonies. Does this past excuse him for continuing to own slaves? For having a sexual relationship with his women slaves? Or his contribution to eugenics with his pseudoscience race equation? Does the work of Robert E. Lee's father negate the fact that he owned hundreds of slaves and attempted to defer their freedom?
bigbadbum1 Acknowledging that they may have initially held anti-slavery views does not excuse the fact that, overall, they did much more to reinforce slavery on institutional levels as political figures. Do you expect me to weep for the depth of humanity Hitler showed in all his photo ops with young children? All of a few instances of good prove is that they were three dimensional people--big whoop. Don't try to turn them into models of abolitionism when the weight of history and their very own words weigh against them.
bigbadbum1 listen, I deal mostly with the reconstruction era and quite honesly am not fond of studying the revolutionary war, but you're ignoring too much lmao. Like the impact that somersett v Stewart had on slaveholder's stance on revolution--some saw it as pro slavery (not entirely true) which kept them neutral to the revolution or loyal to the British but many others saw it opening a path for the abolishment of slavery (also not entirely true) and became pro revolution. Even more important than that, the impact of British General Dunbar's proclamation that enslaved Black people could join the British side to secure their freedom? Even the bare fact that Jefferson took his initial anti-slavery passages out of the declaration? You'd have to ignore many salient aspects leading up to the American revolution to ignore the role slavery played in it.
bigbadbum1 *Google just told me that apparently the British General was named Dunmore, not Dunbar. Whoops, guess I need to brush up on my revolutionary history. By the way, I think you may want to consider doing that too. Hannah-Jones is far from the first historian to mention the importance of slavery in the revolutionary war. Since you encouraged me to do my own research and cited the most basic superficial facts, I will in turn encourage you to actuallt do an archive dive about the points I mentioned. Or, you know, just use basic reasoning to consider why Jefferson left the issue of slavery out of the declaration if he and others didn't hope to preserve it. Either way, prove you have more basis than a 9th grade American history class before daring to acuse someone else of not having an incomplete understanding of something. Good day sir 💃🏾
I’m so glad that she made sure to tell this country’s true history. So many people want to believe in the hypocrisy so they don’t have to change the way they think about America. Either you will realize it or your generations will
even Ny times admit there are mistakes in this fake history
1619 Project is verifiably false and has been debunked. This ends with the usual grift - give us all your money or your a racist
Confederates and their sympathizers loves
CAUCASIAN
RACE
THEORY
Weird that half the states didn’t want slavery even in 1776. A handful made slavery illegal upon declaring revolution because they saw it as a British institution. The 3/5ths comprise was fiercely argued for specifically to try to curb slavery.
This woman is either lying or is completely confused.
No states abolished slavery near 1776, that is a lie. Tye 3/5th compromise was about taking away the souths voting power as they could vote FOR their slaves with 3/5ths voting power. Yes the civil war was about slavery but there is evidence that before America existed, most European countries refused to accept slavery as legal. America was in direct violation of those laws when forming a country that was built by slaves.
This is so good. Can't wait to read this and share.
Interesting....some of the knowledge she is dispensing is good but I'm in need of some quick research for fact checking. She paints a beyond pathetic picture of the reality of slavery , something that many people don't want to talk about.
Prepare to be disappointed cuz simple fact checking debunks multiple points in her essay
ATLGaGirl09 🤦🏻♀️
@@warboss346 those "fact checks" (five historians) got called out on their lies as well, do some updated research.
Rewrite history? I don't like the sound of that
Reframe. She said reframe. “Until the Lion Learns How to Write, Every Story will Glorify the Hunter”
👄Correct history!!
Yeah, I don't know why people say that. Writing history and including the stuff that has been omitted isn't rewriting anything. It's just writing history.
Ancient Greek accounts of the Persians were DEFINITELY unbiased.
White people rewrite history all the time for there narrative are you serious that why it's call whitewashing history smh
All History is a process of interpretation. "The Lost Cause" was a specific doctrine of historical interpretation (supported by a selected subset of facts) that was introduced by Southerners after the Civil War to benefit themselves. It has been accepted as "fact" and taught ever since. Facts by themselves do not determine history. Context, interpretation and sense-making are equally important. Anyone concerned about history being rewritten has never actually studied history. History is constantly being rewritten as new facts come to light. That's what history is.
Incorrect facts do not determine history.
I was born in 1953 and I met her aunt when I was a child and turns out she was an ex-slave so that means at that time we weren't that really far out of bening is she almost made it to the 1970
1860 is when slavery finally ended. 110 years before 1970. Jim Crow, now yes she experienced that.
The goal of 1619 is quite sinister.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I dont believe you.
@@breathingaloha3023 1865.
This was a great interview, Trevor Noah!!
Loved how you asked the questions you did as they allowed Ms. Hannah Jones to explain the narrative of her people's journey in these United States. Her boldness in confronting this will allow all Americans to revisit our history and the 'stories' being taught/told about how Africans came to the shores of these United States!!💯
I LOVE how Trevor opened this! Because one of the first questions people who want to “get over it” ask. 🙄
Colin Flaherty's videos on TH-cam and Bitchute.
Darth Vader a Conservative Media radio host. GTFOH!
penguins inadiorama what demographic is that “you” aimed at?
Lots of comments here saying she’s lying or being revisionist without proof.
Okay, can you quote passages from the book that are false, then support it with your own truthful facts of the real history. Also, the so-called historians who critiqued the book. Can you quote what they said exactly? I would love to see these, then compare it with what Nikole herself and the book have said.
She is so composed and so intelligent and so charismatic. What a delight and what an informative, engaging interview. Trevor always does a great job and has such interesting people on the show
Carmel Buckingham Her entire project has been fact checked and debunked.
whenever a friend tells me racism is no longer a problem, I just remind him Rush Limbaugh received the medal of freedom.
Bazz Bro
I also remind people about Black Lives Matter and Louis Farrakhan
Colin Flaherty's videos on TH-cam and Bitchute.
I threw up when I heard that!
"REEEEEEEE! Everyone I politically dissagree with is a racist!!!!!"
"The only racist are the identarians on the left."
Is this satire?
I really love and respect Nikole Hannah-Jones. Job well done....thank you.
Best interview l have heard about this subject. Trevor keeping it real Shame on America 🇺🇸
It has no shame,Republicans right now making facts of American history illegal
This is the ultimate victimhood claiming.
And I'll bet you thought Christopher Columbus was a great man.
@@jimmyjam5453 No man. I just know that her narrative's been disproven by Legit Historians. I hope that doesn't trigger you.
@@vokoaxecer no trigger but nothing is disproven. Black history in America is very limited and skewed to show America in the best possible light. . History books have people believing Christopher Columbus was a great man Malcolm x was a evil man, the Confederate flag is a positive symbol, the civil war had nothing to do with slavery. Black people enjoy slavery, and contributed nothing to the country. in Texas they don't even consider the civil war a civil war it's the war of northern aggression that's what's in their actual history books. Everything I just said sadly my childrens teacher's were not aware of. When academics study and memorize a lie that's all they know. So when someone tries to show them something other than what they have been taught over the decades it's difficult if not impossible for some to see any other picture.
@@jimmyjam5453 I know. The solution to that isn't racially charged rewriting of American History to pander to a movement but a have an open dialogue like the one you and I are having.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Wonderful work. Americans are finally seeing something different. How importantly the American story is tied to African American history.
I’m not trying to discount the awful history of slavery and racism in America, but America isn’t founded on slavery. What about Boston massacre, taxation without representation, and the intolerable acts. It was about mainly the right to decide americas own destiny as an independent nation away from the tyranny of the crown
Shadow Doc this isl why you need to read...it is explained that America had the audacity to defy Britain because of its wealth. Americans rallied up the cost and guess what guaranteed the cost and paid for the war - slavery.
@@yvette3831 america was wealthy back then. Okay. I must have missed the part where Congress couldn’t afford to pay its soldiers, people starved in valley forge, and the US navy had to steal its boats, and america had to ask for money and supplies from France
Shadow Doc we are still wealthy and let people starve suffer disease and death on our soil. War has its costs nothing is perfect but the overwhelming estimate of success was the same. Worth the risk.
@@yvette3831 you still haven’t answered the question. How can america be founded on slavery in 1619 when history tells us somethings different and Britain didn’t abolish slavery until 1833. Stop deflecting to your emotional talking points.
Just so everyone knows, her essay is filled with historical fallacies and assumptions, and was reviewed by many prominent historians that actually sent a letter against this essay. She says things like Lincoln was against black equality and chooses to leave out great black leaders and movements because they contradict the thesis. It’s unfortunate that she is praised for something that is activism based on an agenda rather than actual fact and journalism.
Salim Sivaad I acknowledge that yes, Lincoln was a product of his time which was a racist society. However, he was nonetheless a vital player on the road to racial equality in America and his views evolved as he spent more time with figures like Frederick Douglass. He was not perfect, but he was a transformational leader for his time and believed that African Americans should be held to the same rights detailed in the constitution, and he eventually directly contradicted his remarks from 1958.
Salim Sivaad three days before he died he expressed support for black political rights. As I said his views evolved over time and we always tend to look at history through the eyes of the present. Yes he held racist views during his life. But he opposed slavery since the beginning of his life and his views continued to evolve. He would have continued to evolve had he not died so suddenly. I’m not saying the man was perfect but he was a pivotal step in achieving black equality and to say that he was against eventual black equality is not true. He was the one who chose to make the war about slavery and it was him that forced through the 13th amendment. These are also facts that are well documented.
Salim Sivaad so he is not to be credited if he changes over time? He is to be beholden to his earlier views? He did hold all of these views at one point but he changed over time. He did initially believe in colonization but relented and supported citizenship for black people. He wasn’t as advanced as some of his compatriots like Thaddeus Stevens. But you make gains one step at a time in a divided congress and country and that’s what Lincoln was doing. Hell if he was such a racist why would Obama launch his campaign in Springfield and be sworn in on Lincoln’s Bible? Nikole says that we declared independence to keep slaves which is not true. If you won’t take my word for this, then look into the letter that 5 of this country’s most renowned historical scholars have sent detailing the inaccuracies in the 1619 project.
@Salim Sivaad Lincoln was a racist slave owner, the civil war was never faught over freeing slaves, it was faught to prevent succession from Tyranny again. He established a more power federal government and linked it to the banking system. Her analysis put slaves as this high role in economic activity which is fairly not true. Sure Southern states had more slave activity but the North was highly more productive in terms of technological advancement. And they didn't have much slavery, they were normal businesses and to put slavery at the centerfold is disingenuous to real historical context. It's simply propaganda to promote a political agenda against capitalism which we do not have. America is Fascist corporatism sponsored by the state, and people vote in these oppressors and fight over manufactured hate. I was under the impression that racism was dead the media sure seems to divide people, maybe that's why i feel that way. I choose not to watch the brainwashing box.
Tom Wlazlinski what made you think I support Donald trump because I don’t. As for the crimes against humanity I’m curious as to what he did that was so bad. And insulting my intelligence isn’t really a good argument to make. I wish you the best in figuring out all the problems you have because you seem like a very angry person.
Maybe she should write a book called 2022 and she could talk about how Africa still has slaves to this day. I'm just saying, that might be a better place to focus your rage on.
What's the problem? Did she say something wrong or inaccurate?
We’re not talking about Africa. She doesn’t live there nor has she ever. She’s talking about the US, where black Americans were enslaved. Stay on topic.
@MMTLP-JON Stay on subject. Let's get our house in order, first. Then, we can move on to help people or countries that never said that, "All men are created equal or We the people.."
But, you keep trying!!
2 corporate puppets here in a poor attempt to rewrite history
Do you know why they want to rewrite history?
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
That is crazy. Taxation without representation is absolute in history. Read the letters sent to King George. England was still practicing slavery in 1830, as was the rest of the world. The revolution was not fought for slavery, nobody was threatening the institution of slavery at that time. You cannot rewrite history based on a single race, otherwise, why was America not started by the Native Americans, which is my family tree. Or why aren’t we discussing the Ottoman Empire having historical written record as the founding of Greece and Romania? History should be adjusted with new better information, not rewritten with no historical evidence, or backing from historians (black, white, native, not just white disagree) and taught as truth to school children.
1619's goal is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Nikole, I like knowing as much of the facts as possible about slavery that dealt with both Africans and Indians.
You won't get that from her.
She's not a historian. Or a journalist. She's a bIack supremacist activist. Why would you look to her for 'facts'?
@@Matt-kt9nm Did you do a related research and what was your findings?
I would appreciate it deeply if someone here in this comment section would be so kind as to explain to me how this project is revisionist history? What particular details about the project are historically false?
part of 1619 project is to portrait revolutionary war as if it was about "slavery", but it was not. they are doing that because they want to promote sense of entitlement to the black people.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I see you like to use a lot of scary words like "socialism" and "communism" to describe just about anything you think is just a little too progressive. I'm not saying I support the 1619 project but I don't think the people involved with it have any ill-intentions. In fact, contrary to what you said I think the project seeks to reduce resentment between blacks and whites, not exacerbate it. I don't think the 1619 project is trying to put black people at the center of American history, it's just trying to be more inclusive and make black people feel apart of the American story as much as white people.
@@neojon4871 Did you actually read the 1619 Project compilation of articles? Frankly, it doesn't sound like you did.
@@60LifeRedefined I did. Severs times I believed it. Then I was presented with facts that disproves much of it now I really wonder what the motives are. It really feels like it is to keep Black Americans enslaved mentally.
Basically all of it. It's pure ideology. It's a complete re-write of history from a bIack supremacist perspective. Mind you, that this project was not done by journalists and historians, but by racist activists.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, EVERY DATE HAS BENN ALTERED. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the (Democrat) Party is always right.” - George Orwell, “1984”
@@taurtue that's what the democrats Ministry of Trust WANTS you to believe is true
Name a country that didn't have slavery.
Is that supposed to make it ok?
Some countries STILL have slavery.
@@jimjam1188 no because slavery have been a thing for thousands of years dumbass and to try to “reframe” history is not good at all
@@g.w.f.212 that's why it's been SO important for the statues to be torn down in the park's...from Wyoming USA 🇺🇸 🤠
But it was different.
“The American Revolution was fought in order to maintain slavery”- Future History Books written by Nicole Hannah Jones, after all monuments of Washington, Jefferson, Grant, and every other president are torn down (which she condoned). After all, even if you were a white man present during slavery, you were complicit in slavery (even if your work laid the foundation for its abolition or you directly fought against it like Grant) and if you lived during Jim Crow you were complicit in that, and if you were alive during the era of microagressions you were complicit in that. Any history that portrays any European descendants or their culture or struggles in America favorably is white supremacist wrongthink and must be dismantled.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Basically a an accurate summary of the agenda
I can listen to her all day... Her dialog...explanation...delivery is so smooth... truth runs that way
Every person that came to this land took from my people. They were also slaughtered by genocide. I'm part Cherokee Indian
This is what so insulting about these types of ideologues. If you're going to go back to the start of slavery, why start there? This land already belonged to the natives for centuries before Europeans discovered it. Don't they count?
Don't get bought in, by the 1619 project. 1619 wants to enslave everyone.
1619's goal is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Who the hell are those 6 people disliking this video in 20mins ?
You know who...
Slavery advocates..
Members of the cult45 trumptard coalition...
Who cares?
Whites that hate being called white and dont like being "painted with a broad brush"
One thing I want to bring up is that Portugal was the first European power to abolish slavery.
Gabriel de oliveira But it was also, at one time, the biggest driver of slaves.
Lol and they love to blame the white man for slavery lmao
Also the first to embrace it (black slavery, that is).
@@tommymahon8939 the white man embraced it and kept it going for years. From the moment they came to this country let's not forget what happened to the indigenous people that indured the white man's wrath, oh yeah but y'all try to white wash that too.
They were the first European power to capitalize on it lol
We owe the blacks of this country NOTHING!!
Wonderful work! Thank you
no it isnt. its racism and hatred. i guess youre a racist.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
she made half of it up. Even the idea that 1619 was the start of slavery in the US was a lie. They were indentured servants, meaning that while their contracts were bought and sold, they would be free citizens once that contract was up.
This was the worst comedy show Ive seen in years!!!!!
I love Nikole Hannah-Jones. Thank you for shedding light on America's true history. The world is watching.
Nikole Hannah-Jones is to history what Jerry Springer is to social studies.
Perfect!!! Love that.
@@andimom2010 FACTS: Bc THE PAST was written thru the eyes of Kidnapping-Murdering-Thieving-Rapists, A SMART person would WANT TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS LEFT OUT, MISCONSTRUED, OR MISREPRESENTED!!! Exposing hidden truths, is not rewriting. It's simply telling THE WHOLE TRUTH! But I understand, you're just showing how much YOU'RE RACISM dislikes the *TRUTH*!$#@!!!
YOU TOO *J L N*
What she says about black people fostering their freedom is really only partially true. In Massachusetts, starting with Quock Walker, slaves could sue for their freedom citing "all men are created equal" and Christianity, and all of them who tried succeeded in their freedom even though slavery was still legal. HOWEVER, she ignores that juries were comprised of WHITE people who looked within themselves and deemed slavery immoral EVERY time it was brought to court.
I only point this out because we shouldn't look at history as which group did what as an exclusive thing. History is dynamic. Multiple groups of people contributed to everything in their own way. We don't need to overcorrect to say black people actually exclusively did this thing or the other.
Although it shouldn't matter, no I'm not white. I'm brown.
Why did you have to mention the white ? Your a clown for that
"It's a little angry". So true sis.
Great interview.
#ADOS #B1 #TRE45ON
Wow as a libertarian/conservative I love learning about history, I knew growing up learning about the constitution and that the founding fathers some owned slaves, that part always struck a nerve with me, I love hearing truth no matter where it comes from! Great interview and information!
The problem is that this is misleading information. Try the 1776 Project instead.
This 1619 project has been criticized by a lot of historians for its inaccuracies try looking up the American revolution your self and America in general. She has a very big bias
This is a terrible interview, and daily show is a propaganda machine of the ultra left.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Great interview and I love how she answered these common yet annoying questions about why this part of American history matters. Slavery is truly part of the foundation and once that is acknowledged then the U.S. can move forward instead of remaining stagnant in its cultural evolution.
It’s not like slavery isn’t being taught though. She wants to have a particular spin on the subject. I don’t trust her one bit. Bad faith actor.
I've been following this author and she speaks truth to power in a way that gives me chills
Colin Flaherty's videos on TH-cam and Bitchute.
I know. Except it gave me gas!!!! I couldnt stop laughing at the goofy acting! Hahahaha
Now that the dems are finally through sucking up all the oxygen out the room with Trump’s impeachment, instead of getting back to the Reparations discussion/resolution they are back discussing immigration... (sigh) ... THANK YOU so MUCH for this Trevor! 🙏🏽 Great work Nikole Hannah-Jones, and Great interview guys! 🙏🏽❤️ #ReparationsNow #BlackAgenda2020 #NoReparationsNoVote !
Search : ' Jews Behind Slavery
@@roysmith3767 Jews are white.
reparations: if you family lineage has been here for 150+ years and you can prove your ancestors were in fact brought here on slave ships.
No income tax, no property tax, and free college. That might help out some people 🍻
@@dontplay_withme.965
Search : ' How Israel Threat Black People '
I'm a White male, late 60's, raised in a Conservative home in the South. While I disagree with some things that Nikole Hannah-Jones said, overall I agree with her. It is a fact of human psychology that, if you do not affectively deal with trauma, that trauma will be passed to future generations. This is being found in children who were sexually assaulted, we're finding this to be true in the family of veterans, research has found that some pregnant women passed their 9/11 trauma onto their unborn children, The various Black tribes were stripped of their language, culture, religion, dignity; the violence on them was a horrific experience that Whites cannot even begin to appreciate. The conversation around the 1619 Project is a way of dealing with this cultural trauma. The 1619 Project is not intended to make people feel badly about themselves. The intent is to start a more honest conversation and that I support.
Slavery. Indentured Servitude. Low cost labor pool. For-profit-prisons. Military Service. Student Debt. Racism. Slavery hasn't gone anywhere. The 1% is, as usual, the richest and most powerful and the rest of us just power the machinery that ultimately brings them their wealth. Americans must not be very good negotiators. Other nations may pay more in taxes but what they receive in return is something that American Society is expected to live without - you know - like universal health care which improved the lives of every citizen IN those nations and campaign finance reform which strengthened their democracies. Reject the 2010 Citizens United decision.
only because the greedy sick fks in charge of things have convinced the greedy stupid fks not in charge of anything, that capitalism (basically a dog eat dog system) is the best way to develop a strong stable society with a level playing field for all.
Slavery were never the issue of 1619
Well there is a political agenda behind it.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
This is a misnomer. The first African slaves brought to what is now the United States was brought over years before 1619 and it were the Spanish, not the English, who introduced slavery to North America.
@Major Henry L.
But the ones who were brought over here from Africa, were not Africans,
they were Hebrew-Israelites, who escaped to Western Africa, fleeing from
the Roman soldiers. The reason 1619 is significant, is because time for
the Israelites slavery began then. They were to be enslaved, according to
Genesis 15:13, for four-hundred years (400), the time God set for them
because of their disobedience. President Donald Trump, signed Bill HR
1242 recognizing the end of God's term for the Israelites. Whatever hap-
pens, know this people, it's getting ready to '''''''RAIN, and REIGN,''''''''
There was an old hymn my grandmother used to sing (her mother was a
slave), named, ''''We'll understand it better, bye, and bye.'''' Not now, but,
Bye, and Bye. When? Bye and Bye! Bye, and Bye, is almost here Repent,
for your redemption draweth nigh!!
You know there’s some hard truths in this series when so many people (wonder who) get riled up.
It is indeed made and intended to rile people up. The unfortunate thing is that neither side realizes that it is purposely directed at them. We all keep being presented the "truth" as false dichotomies that are usually inversions of one another's. Subversively clear with the date chosen one a six one a nine. Why not any date in-between Columbus and now?
The hypocrisy is, I speculate and fear, is that she knows the division this creates and is only a face of sinister collective. I have no enemies. Especially inherited ones.
The truth and the way is not revealed through resentment Norwood It Foster so much.
I first encountered Nikole Hannah-Jones on This American Life. MacArthur Foundation gave their award to an actual genius this time. Hard working, voracious researching, fearless and no shit-taking. Thank you for giving us tools to fight the system.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@neojon4871 go directly to hell.
@@djm2516 Why does the truth hurt you so much?
@@danielslack9201 Isn’t it your bedtime. Maybe argue with your mom instead of arguing with this 70 y/o woman. Not really interested in having a convo with you.
@@djm2516 And yet your comment is twice as long.....Take your ccp trash someplace else! Stop telling people to go to hell because they dont agree with you!
Her thought process and suggestions unintentionally will drive away from racial equilibrium. Good luck America. Land of tribes instead of land of Americans.
They are trying to promote socialism, communism.
I hope you realize how ironic this comment is... Yikes
A "rethinking" .......
*rethinking in progress*............................
Rethinking how much of this book is true
@@darrengray1569maybe you would rather believe the traditional lies than be uncomfortable
@@darrengray1569 I mean like do you regularly practice this immediate skepticism towards books with as much evidence and vetting from historians and scholars as 1619? Or just books you don't want to believe are true.
okay but did you hear the rest of the video? “rethinking” is so trivial compared to the message behind this video.
This is racist. Teach slavery and it's implications. We didn't fight for independence cause of slavery. She wants everything to be race related.
That's her goal...
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
If you want to get technical slavery never ended and still legal continues in America. They ended private slavery but states are allowed to keep criminals as slaves which imo criminal or not no human should be enslaved.
Yeah ok. You're an idiot.
I'm Norwegian and my ancestors came to America in the 1870's. Should I pay reparations to the Celtic people (Germans) since we enslaved them from 800 AD to 1100 AD?
You're confusing them with facts and reality.
The enslaving of Celtic people has little to no influence in today's society, the slavery of black Americans does.
@@taurtue Yeah, but so do the black ancestors of African Americans who still live in Africa. In fact, they are still enslaving people. So should African Americans, who are ancestors of these slavers, pay reparations. What about you? Do you have a great grandpa or great great grandpa who might have killed someone? Should you pay reparations to their ancestors?
Man........ I'm shocked that they have her on here. Things are going to get interested going forward.
I was already familiar with this project going forward. It's filled with horrific atrocities against Black People.
WOW!!! no one has ever heard of slavery!!! Thank god this book was written... and 13% is still responsible for 50%
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Wow she is just brilliant and marvelous- "We've never dealt with the harm that was done"- so true and inspiring.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
One question...why would the American colonies break away from Britain in 1776 to maintain slavery, when Britain had not outlawed slavery yet until 1833? Were the British gradually adding restrictions to phase slavery out, that made the colonies think they would eventually be forced to give slavery up?
Oh, I guess the British had ended slavery "in Britain itself" in 1772 but not in the British empire and colonies, and that made the southern US colonies nervous that they would be next?
Truth crushed to earth has risen again.To God be the glory
wait so, 1619 is trying to look at another point of view of history that wasn’t really addressed with the hope that the education behind looking at that side of history will spark conversations and lead people to address the lack of educational coverage schools have for slavery and the impact of it? if that’s the case then where’s the issue?
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Left wing Marxist piece aimed at saying everything from accounting to the industrial revolution to Microsoft today rose out of slavery. I would say read the whole project for yourself. It is not unbiased
All people are created equal, but Some people are more equal than others
STFU
A quote from the book "Animal Farm", telling indirectly of hypocrisy and power
I don't understand the idea that most of us weren't aware of the hypocrisy or the atrocities of our founders and our founding as a whole. We've all been well aware of that for a long long time...I think the point that is missing is you can't just discount the fact that without the actions of our founders our country would be in a very different place today...I don't know what kind of place but definitely different lol. The point is people hold the founders in such a high esteem because whether you liked them or not they are men that changed the course of our country's history. I'm all for giving a more complete history especially to our kids...some of these text books are a joke. But you can't do that with sentiment, it has to be undesputed historical fact...that is where the 1619 project has failed too many holes she needs a team of scholars to come out with something more tangible...but I do like the general idea of it
She's just a tool for the left. "and she doesn't know it".
Well there is a political agenda behind it.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
You read the book? There’s a whole host of cited sources and historians.
Where can I purchased this book or magazine 1619 Projects? A great interview. Thanks for answering my question where I can purchase this magazine.
Google is your friend, Deborah. You can find pdf versions to read and more information about the ongoing project.
purchase*
Palestine is beautiful.
Can't believe people especially black people doesn't understand that racism was invented in 1619.
I'm black go ahead educate me.
Yes, we all want to believe we are pure and our shit don't stink. Thank you for telling these truths and for presenting history in a way that is relatable too. What do we do about it today? What do we do with the information? As a middle-aged white woman, I always do my best to learn as much as possible so I can vote intelligently. In my city, which has a sick history of racism, many black people don't seek out information and they don't vote at all. I never thought about how, when the constitution was written, so many diverse populations were not free or not allowed to vote or participate in democracy. But, now that they can, many still don't. How do we get people, and especially those most effected by policies, to participate, to seek the information about history, to have civil conversations and to vote?
Search : ' Jews Behind Slsvery '
Amy This is the results of unchecked white supremacy and greed. If large influxes of uncorrupted history, knowledge, media, wealth and unity were to circulate within the indigenous black cultures, communities and tribes spreaded out across the world (panafricanism) and stop existing under this hypnosis of pseudo-indoctrinations that surround us everyday for the past 400+ years, the potential and power of the coalition of a black empire would easily dismantle neo-colonialism. We need to think like a nation not a plantation and act as one people to return to our former Afro-equilibrium and glorified lost estate of resources, healing arts, medicine, science, technology, and spiritual homeostasis beyond the records of slavery.
Please don't try to convince people to vote in our elections. Our politics is corrupt, so why bother? Our country is so structurally fractured that you cannot vote without preventing corruption from ensuing: understand that.
@@roysmith3767 Only a tiny minority. Venetians, Arabs, Dutch, English did more.
1619 Project is verifiably false and has been debunked. This ends with the usual grift - give us all your money or your a racist oh and vote Democrat
Every school needs to implement this critical curriculum. Such a defining moment in human history along with the Germans bombing Pearl Harbor.
You know, as I am hearing about t his bogus view of American History, I can't help, since this is June, thinking about June 1944. An American General, Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, while getting ready to launch the Allied forces on the Continent of Europe, he carried on his shoulders the weight of the entire war effort. On his word America and much of Western Europe was either going to survive or die. The lives of hundreds of thousands of troops rested upon the command to go. If he made the wrong decision or if his plan was off just a little, the future of America rested with him. He carried a burden that most men will never know, but he knew what had to be done. And one better,, prior to the go order he composed a memo in which he states the full responsibility failure, if it failed was his. I don't think that any country based as you claim, and sewn in the seeds of slavery would produce a man like this. Everything that America has accomplished in its history was to liberate people just as our ancestors liberated the slaves in 1865. This whole idea id bogus, this is the greatest country on earth and your premise is totally wrong. By the way, that same General Eisenhower was, years later the first American President to enforce an order of the Supreme Court regarding desegregation when he had the military in Little Rock ensure the ability for black students to attend the white high school.
@Jantz Fitzgerald I assume you are speaking metaphorically, reverse psychology. Otherwise the comment is different.
With every interview/show I view, the Brilliance of God Shines upon you, Trevor. You are truly a Gifted interviewer, and God has Placed you here/there for a reason. You are relatable, and you are doing this job with heart💕💕 I am Forever a fan/supporter🙏
Young lady, I really appreciate you very much. Continue to say it like it is. Love you Trevor ❤️
What was the US before “black people turned it into a Democracy”?
It's an op Ed...that's it..not a project..not a novel..not reality..has anyone watched CSA the mockumentary
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
I don't know if you know what op-ed means
2:41 Imagine being "deeply embarrassed" for flying an American flag in your yard.
‘Give America a Break.’ ‘Instead of trying to Break it.’ - Please Give a 👍 If you agree with ‘Debunking’ such hokum that this lady learned in a class she attended, (This is the FIRST TIME that I’ve ever asked for a response. And Thank you). Stay safe, Stay well. (Mentally & Physically). I realize that it hasn’t been easy. Maybe Americans can change this ‘Re-Racism.’ But, I doubt anyone that carries around so much hatred can be detoured easily. It’s just ‘So Mental.’ I almost feel ‘Sorry’ for this Nikole H. Jones. Maybe she’ll find healing, but, I doubt it.
👎🏾
Funny…
Olivia G. Nobody can make anybody else like each other. It doesn’t work that way. If you’re a hater, That’s not my problem. I was raised to love everybody around me. Don’t blame me because others have mental issues. I’ve got enough to worry about putting food on my plate.
@@augustrush7538 lol, I agree with you. We don’t have to agree or like everyone around us. I just didn’t agree, that’s why you got the 👎🏾. It’s that simple, no malice behind it.
@Olivia G, Answer this one question, why would my mother teach me that if you’re not part of the solution, you must be part of the problem. Recently, even Bill Gates admitted to being part of the climate problem. Many of the individuals that are screaming ‘Green’- Are the worst polluters on the Earth.
IF and this is a BIG IF, our people would READ our BIBLES with OPEN hearts, especially Deuteronomy 28, we would realize that our struggles for equality and freedom ARE SPIRITUAL not racial, economical...when WE as a people turn from idolatry and worship and OBEY the Creator of heaven and earth...then and only then we WILL be free, until then we will continue to struggle and talk about racism...
Damn, what an intelligent and articulate woman. This was such a compelling interview...
Absolutely agree! ☆♡☆
Colin Flaherty's videos on TH-cam and Bitchute.
She’s a divisive liar.
Yeah taxation on 138 slaves .. they fought to keep their property (black people) tax down and they were tired of people telling them what to do and having dominion over them …
Wow....what a skewed warped mentality.
I agree that some of the history is not taught fully but this is a hot sloppy mess.
Does the magazine say anything about the epidemic of fatherlessness in the black community?
Jordan Owen no, this is just another victim virtue signaling. No solutions. Just complaining.
I remember the good old days when "What If..." was followed by "Gwen Stacy Had Lived?"
Just a heads up. All of this is false. One thing that jumped out to me is that Thomas Jefferson never wrote “we hold these truths to be self evident” he actually wrote “we hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable” Ben Franklin didn’t like that and changed it to “self evident”.
It’s the little things like that which shoe she did not do very good research AT ALL.
Fantastic Magazine? Fantastic job? wow this was truly insane, now i know why they ate pushing this in schools, this needs to be taken out now
or the left will kill America.
Keep your head up...the TRUTH always stands alone.
Her goal is to destroy America. to enslave everyone.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
@@neojon4871 okay conspiracy theorist
Awesome interview👍
Love that Trevor is able to see it from the "outside" and can ask questions that we Americans are too embarrassed to ask. Could it be that the Reconciliation Panels dealt with responsibility of action in South Africa (Germany, you too) brings a richer conversation? It's time we Americans grow up and have the adult conversations that are screaming to be had. Not just "racial", "caste" as well.
The moment Nikole Hannah-Jones appeared on this show, we knew she has no credibility. Thank you, Trevor Noah, for once again showing us two things: "The 1619 Porject" is social Marxist revisionism crap.. and that that "periodical" DESERVES to be called The New York Slimes.
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH COMMUNISM?!?!?!?
@@Ubermensch9240 , the entire "1619" hoax is about cultural Marxism, you nitwit. Trevor Noah, like all the other Leftist celebs, is a social Marxist.
@@Panwere36 No it isn't. Where the fuck does it say that all wealth should be shared equally?
@@Ubermensch9240 what do you think this is leading to? Do you genuinely believe it's just to spread supposed "truths" to the masses and let that widespread knowledge end with the awareness? Or that there is a financial gain at the end of the line.....
take your time...
@@Moviemaniac221 If there was it would be through Capitalism, but it's a historical essay so no that doesn't work either.
Don't want to burst your bubble but if you really want to get technical the first settlement in the U.S. was St Augustine, FL. So let's talk about the 1565 project. This is over 60 years ahead of your vaunted 1619. These were people seeking freedom. They left the inquisition in their rear view. I doubt they had slavery on the mind.
If you want to be historically accurate, Florida was not one of the original 13 colonies. It was still a Spanish settlement in the 16th century (e.g., 1565).
@@kipwonder2233 Yes you are absolutely correct. I can't remember if that was a part of the Louisiana Purchase. Regardless, it was not one of the 13 colonies. Still, it was older than VA.
@@WMJCPA 1619 was the year when the British people, who would become the United States, first introduced slaves to the 13 colonies. The British, and the 'tyranny' of King George...as opposed to Spain...being who the United States won our freedom from. The United States didn't purchase Florida until 2/22/1819...200 years after 1619. Also...technically...St. Augustine was established to eliminate the threat of the French...who had established an outpost near what would become St. Augustine.
@@kipwonder2233 I understand. I was only commenting that the British were not the first people to come here. I was off on the purchase of Florida, I thought it occurred as part of the Louisiana purchase.. I thank you for clarifying that for me. I remember learning about the slaves that came here in 1619, but since these were indentured to the British that were settling in Virginia, ow can one make the claim that these slaves had anything to do with American slavery? I also recall, that many of these initial so called slaves, were in fact indentured servants who were working off some sort of debt or other obligation to the people who brought them in. Remember, back then in England they had such a thing as debtors prisons. A person indebted to another cold be sent to prison if they could not honor the obligation. Indentured servitude was a way to work off that debt hence avoiding the debtor's prison. In any case, I don't see how this can count as the birth of a nation, it sounds more like a travelogue brochure.
@@WMJCPA I understand your confusion. You have not read...and have absolutely NO idea of what The 1619 Project ACTUALLY contains. Or else you'd know that Nikole Hannah-Jones was referencing The White Lion...which is easily Googled for reference. You're simply one more person who believes they're smarter than a MacArthur Genius Grant recipient. Fascinating🤦.
Just yesterday I was explaining how slavery has affected the modern people to a white man who declared that he wasn't angry at the English for what happened - as if the British had any real effect on us today.
nicholas schoonbeck .... I hear you. So many people don’t have the ability to think critically or conceptually.
I don’t think all Americans are in denial or purposefully ignorant.
How do we bring all people on to the same page?
Palestine is beautiful.
The goal of 1619 is to inject sense of entitlements to various groups in America. To promote socialism and communism.
And destroy conservatism.
For example, reparations for Black American:
1619 is rewriting black history to emphasis their suffering, to maximize, to vilify white people. To grow hatred and entitlement in Black American. Thus they would require government to act on it. They will be making demands like reparations. What we are talking about is trillions of dollar.
If government decided to act on it, which means greatly increase taxes. Resource (money) to the government, thus creating a big government. Resource= power.
1619, New York Times are not just doing this to Black American, they want to do this to every groups in America.
Socialist's plan is to tell you: "You all can ask something from the government, because the nation owe you so much, you must elect me" For example: free education, free health care, free medicine, free housing, employment, high wage.
Do you see the problem with that? There is simply not enough resource to be doing that, or China/ Russia/ Vietnam/ Cuba would have already succeeded. Do you see any technological innovation coming from those countries?
No, because everyone in these countries is a zombie. There is no motivation for them to thrive. The state will take care of everything, but in the end, there won't be enough food or medicine to go around like Venezuela.
Nikole Hannah-Jones is a brave, dedicated woman. She continues to speak her truth and do her work no matter what the haters say about her.
Love you, Nikole. ♥️☺️