i hear december is a good time to make big videos because of increased ad revenue around that time, and timelines usually are big videos.. maybe that carries over to january or something
First, we get LeftyDCI from Narrow Raven and friends, but then we get Lefty being built by William to lure the Puppet away from FNAF 1. Lefty is getting a lot of love. Though the only problem is they both can't be true. And honestly, I highly doubt Lefty was built by William. The blueprints state it was built by Fazbear Entertainment and not Afton Robotics. And at this point in time Afron should basically have no affiliation with them.
True it does say fazbear entertainment on the blueprint, but from the week before we know a guy named Dave works at the fnaf 1 location. I believe this to be william and if he's going undercover at fazbear, he couldn't use the afton robotics name without giving himself away.
@@TerminalError I personally don't believe that is Afton as we also have evidence in the Week Before that Springtrap already exists. Between the bone in the vents and the unknown animatronic in the vent that scares Chica and eats Mr. Cupcake.
True, but that would then imply that afton either dismantled the animatronics before fnaf 1 and they were rebuilt, William unspringlocks himself and then springlocks himself again in follow me, or someone else dismantles the animatronics in follow me
@@TerminalError I don't see why that would mean Afton respringlocked himself. It's described as an animatronic meaning he is in the vents as Springtrap, not Afton. As for the animatronics being rebuilt, that's actually quite simple. We know they have spare Endoskeletons and full costumes in FNAF 1. And for why they are still haunted, the shells of the old animatronics are still here and are haunted. Plus, we know the animatronics poses the building in some way in the Week Before. Not to mention, Afton being Springlocked before FNAF 1 not only makes it, so you have to bend over backward to explain the saferooms being sealed phone call after Ralphs death. It also gives further credence to the idea that Michael is looking for Afton, and so he works at FNAF 1 trying to find him. (Before or After SL, it really doesn't matter) Edit: Oh, you meant if Afton Springlocked himself before Follow Me and Follow Me is after FNAF 1.
Just found your channel, regardless of how convoluted and nonsensical, I'm really impressed you were able to tie the books characters like Edwin and the agony/remnant professors. Really unique spin on the fnaf timeline honestly, and your presentation is super engaging too!
The Mimic1 program/AI is based on Daisy, a DOS script/program from the 1990s / late 1980s. The Mimic body is based on Cog, a robot built by MIT in the early '90s. In both cases, the physical technology (the literal circuit boards, chips and so on) needed to build them is very similar to hardware available in the early 1980s. Edit: The Animatronics for Pirates of the Caribbean Ride were made in 1967, after several years in development.
19:30 I think that's how he figures out the Puppet is possessed (23:23 New Tear Tracks gained after Charlie's death = Possession, so he moves to the next stage of his plan to try to "recreate the accident" with the Funtimes), While CASSIDY is the cause behind Fredbear gaining black accessories, becoming Golden Freddy. ADue to Fnaf 4 possibly implying CC is MORE connected to Fredbear (Based on Nightmare Fredbear)... This means it's CASSIDY'S Possession that turns the accessories BLACK. Plus their colour in the Security Logbook with Black hair, Yellow Hair Ties, Blue/Cyan shirt.... which match Golden Freddy's Black Accessories, Yellow Fur and Movie GF/Fredbear in the SB posters have Blue/Cyan Eyes. Meanwhile CC seems to have Freddy's colour scheme. Black Shirt, Brown Hair, Blue shorts.....While Freddy has Black Accessories, Brown Fur, and Blue Eyes.
Circus Baby's Pizza World has to have opened before Springlock Suits were retired, as they had a suit on hand. Even if the 'unfortunate incident at the Sister Location' was something else, that tells us when the Springsuits were retired, as the tape AFTER that one mentions Springbonnie being moved and tells people not to bring customers into the safe room. The Springsuits started being phased out a little bit before the MCI, and were sealed up after the MCI in order to hide evidence before the place shut down. (While the exact language indicates a few suits at a few locations may have stayed in service for a bit, the last confirmed sighting of a springsuit is at the FNAF 2 location in 87, it was a spare not in service, and that happened before the place closed). So Circus Baby's Pizza World was opened in mid 1985 and Elizabeth died right before the MCI. The Gas Leaks teaser implies the Rental Location opens months later(but probably not even a full calender year), so by 1986 the rental location should be up and running, which makes it very easy for Micheal to have gone there prior to FNAF 2, possibly right before FNAF 2.
I agree with some parts of this, but not all. Yes circus baby's needs opened before springlock suits were decommissioned and the wording of the phone call when they were decommissioned implies that some suits may not have been properly removed, I dont think the suits get discontinued immediately after the mci. The phone calls in fnaf 3 sound like they are pretty close to one another with how Ralph starts them off with things like "just a reminder" and "previously mentioned safe rooms." Plus as you said we hear about it in fnaf 2, and because follow me occurs in what looks like the fnaf 1 building, I dont think they get decommissioned/discontinued until some time before fnaf 1. The Week Before says they've been open for a bit already, and Ralph's daughter mentions fredbear. All of this leads me to think that the suits dont get removed until the fnaf 1 building where they then get sealed behind the safe room wall. Also the grave order in Help Wanted 2 princess quest leads me to think that since we enter a sister location elevator after lighting the graves, Elizabeth's death comes after them meaning circus baby's opens between fnaf 1 and fnaf 2. I say take youre daughter to work day because of something in the week before where Ralph says he was glad he didn't bring Copellia to work on take your kid to work day making me think a big incident happened that day and the first bring your daughter to work day was 1993.
@@TerminalError If you wanna take the 'kid to work day' thing 100% literally you also have to take the Happiest Place on Earth trademark 100% literally which happened after that. Those after existed on a small scale run by specific companies or done informally since the 1950s, 1992 is just when it became a national holiday and 1993 is when it was first celebrated as one.
NGL I kinda fw the idea William built the Rockstars as a ruse to get FE to ignore the OG animatronics instead of Henry just building them for the sake of it in Fnaf 6
I'm glad you like it! I thought it was an interesting idea as well and something I dont see anyone really even considering. I get it might be wrong but I think it needs discussed at least.
Unless the original Fredbear is a clockwork Automaton (popular in the 1700s and 1800s with programable discs, such as the Writing Boy). Many were built with music boxes built into them and where meant to either appear to be performing the music or dancing to the music. Some where as small as a 16" doll and one Swan + it's own pond (which also animates) model which was the size of a long dining table.
I personally think Henry is the games version of Edwin Murray, since he has no last name, loses his child in a car related accident, created vacuums (Mr hugs) and could theoretically have the last name Murray. I guess we’ll find out in SOTM hopefully
I think rye toast said this in a podcast or something but it's possible for Henry to take Edwin's role, but Edwin can't take henry's. They have similar stories but Henry is an owner of Freddy's while Edwin just works for them. Henry makes it clear that he wants nothing to do with Freddy's after fnaf 6 while Edwin returns to the pizzaplex in the books. And their kids server different purposes in the story. Charlie possesses the puppet to protect the kids and David teaches the Mimic how to play and gives it some of its characteristics.
I still don't like the idea that William built the Rockstars and Lefty around the time of FNAF 1. It's hard to believe the Rockstars were never put to use in the 30 years between FNAF 1 and FNAF 6. If theorists were supposed to figure that out, then the Rockstars being the face of FNAF 6 was really misleading on Scott's part. Anyone would naturally assume that the new set of animatronics were created for FNAF 6's restaurant, not decades prior to the game's events.
I dont think the rockstars weren't used in those 30 years. I thinks that's exactly how William was able to disassemble the originals in follow me. He made the rockstars, fazbear has a large enough budget to move to a new location, they take the new rockstar line instead of the originals. I think the other animatronics in fnaf 6 help support this. While we don't see any of these animatronics at older locations, we either know or can theorize that they are older animatronics from previous locations. Trash and the gang seem to be really old, parts of the mediocres are in "into the pit" the game showing they are at least from 1985, funtime chica is mentioned in source code around sister location, and the rockstars would be the newest and most advanced set we can purchase in the game because they came from the newest Freddy's location.
love this interpretation. on your point about RTTP's MCI count, i agree that the MCI is 5 kids, however the ITP game, while showing 6, implies this 6th one is "special" somehow. i take this to mean that the 6th one (who's likely Andrew) died either shortly before or shortly after the MCI, but the agony of the ballpit generalised and lumped him in with the others killed during that time period. Furthermore, there's an ending in RTTP where we follow the yellow rabbit 2 days earlier than the scene where we see the MCI and there's already a kid dead in the storage room. this COULD be the 6th one
Ooh I like this idea a lot. I bought that book i just need to sit down and read it now. If I have to go back and say 6 again, I'll be happy I was right the first time, but I might lose my mind
Oof, Circus Baby's between FNAF 2 and FNAF 1 is a big respectable swing. Though I will have to disagree. Between Baby's Birthday line on Thursday in FFPS and the 1587 code from Baby I think it's more like that Circus Baby's opened on July 1st, 1985.
I would agree that it seems like it comes out of nowhere, but I promise you there's some evidence. Like I said, I think it happens on take your daughter to work day but I got that from the week before which has a line saying Ralph is glad he didn't bring copellia on take your child to work day and they emphasize "especially not then". There's only 3 characters in the games with dead kids who work at Freddy's. Edwin, Henry, and William. From these 3, there's only 1 without a confirmed placement on the timeline and that's Elizabeth. After looking into take your child to work day, I found out that it first occurred in 1993 as a national holiday (first being called take your daughter to work day). Does this confirm my theory? No but I do think them including a holiday that can be traced back to close to fnaf 1 and singles out basically 1 character is a very interesting detail.
@@TerminalError My main criticism to that is that Elizabeth wasn't going to bring my child to work day. She was going to the first day the restaurant opened like everyone else. Plus, even if you wanted to argue, Elizabeth isn't going there as a normal child and only staying with William. I highly doubt the first day the restaurant was open was also bring your child to work day. Plus, the community doesn't have a solid explanation for Baby's 1587 code other than it being the date she died as what else would it be. (We know it isn't her counting children as it contradicts the numbers she tells us for that).
Very true. I remembered that there were blacked out cams while recording and while checking i was hoping there's was a path that William could have taken in order to sneak in without getting caught. Didn't seem to be the case but I still think half the cams not working had something to do with it, my pea brain just couldn't put it together yet.
Schrodinger's sixth MCI victim. With that blood splatter beneath the table in the DCI minigame (I forget what it's specifically called), maybe Scott has always had a secret MCI victim in his back pocket. But then, why six graves in 6? Should it be 7? Unless either a) the grave we thought was Charlie's is this victim, b) Charlie is the sixth victim (my personal headcanon) or c) they weren't in the fire and weren't put to rest properly, or d) they don't have a grave? Like they had no parents or their family thought they were a runaway or they were replaced with the dreaded ROBOT CHILD. It still FEELS like a retcon. And if it's Andrew I'm going to be mad. I will die on the hill it'd be stupid to introduce a brand new character in the books just to make UCN more convoluted (he was probably in the books so Afton could live long emough to explode his evil goo everywhere so we can have more spooky stories)
I don't dislike this timeline, I just wish people had a different perspective with Fredbear. I never like how people's conclusion is "becomes Golden Freddy" it's so saturated man.
It's a logical conclusion, isn't it? Dave is probably connected to Golden Freddy, he got bitten by Fredbear, and with Scott doubling down on the yellow suit (FNAF 2, The Silver Eyes, he was originally called something like yellow bear before golden Freddy took over) which is likely a spring lock suit, I don't really know where else Golden Freddy came from. Maybe if he was a pure hallucination?
@@Alkeeros Just because he's a yellow bear doesn't automatically mean he's another Yellow bear. Lmao. Besides we literally have DREADBEAR. Dreadbear who mind you, has a large upper body with a large head, big teeth, and not to mention the brain association and the FNAF 4 references with him. He's not just a "halloween DLC character" he's Fredbear. In the flesh. Golden Freddy I don't think is THE Fredbear. Besides there's multiple versions of characters, it doesn't mean there can only be one fredbear. There's not one Springbonnie, why would it stop there? If you want my opinion, Golden Freddy is **a** Fredbear, but not **THE** Fredbear. However I would never call Golden Freddy the one that caused the bite of 83. That's such a boring idea.
I appreciate trying to draw a straight line, but to my autistic brain it very clearly has a slight concavity towards the bottom of the board that I can't ignore. It's straight... it the space it crosses is slightly curved lol
honestly, your timeline might be most comprehensive one yet, like, I can actually show this to someone who's never heard of fnaf before and, in only over an hour, they can understand the entire first half of the story pretty well(with a few loose threads thanks to secret of the mimic and the new books). you didn't go in any unnecessary or incoherent tangents, the theories you selected were by far the best ones at telling a complete story(even if the evidence for some are a but dry), and you managed to connect everything very effectively, I mean, I got nothing on this, just- good job!
The idea for this theory is basically "what if a sixth child was murdered in the same time period, by William, but it never got reported to the newspapers/connected to the other deaths.
Youre correct that the fnaf 1 nespaper says that but into the pit the book, graphic novel, and game all say 6. Not sure why now that return to the pit (the same story just as a choose your own adventure) says 5
I love how everyone is coming out with their own timelines now
Yo I just saw you on twitter with the steel wool post thing
It's the timeline era of fnaf
i hear december is a good time to make big videos because of increased ad revenue around that time, and timelines usually are big videos.. maybe that carries over to january or something
@@shronkler1994 yeah I heard that too
Yeah this was supposed to come out in December cause I heard ads are good then but I suck at managing myself and I wasn't gonna just sit on this lmao
William: Go to Freddy's and destory the Animatronics
Michael- Fails
William: "Fine I'll do it myself"
First, we get LeftyDCI from Narrow Raven and friends, but then we get Lefty being built by William to lure the Puppet away from FNAF 1. Lefty is getting a lot of love. Though the only problem is they both can't be true. And honestly, I highly doubt Lefty was built by William. The blueprints state it was built by Fazbear Entertainment and not Afton Robotics. And at this point in time Afron should basically have no affiliation with them.
True it does say fazbear entertainment on the blueprint, but from the week before we know a guy named Dave works at the fnaf 1 location. I believe this to be william and if he's going undercover at fazbear, he couldn't use the afton robotics name without giving himself away.
@@TerminalError I personally don't believe that is Afton as we also have evidence in the Week Before that Springtrap already exists. Between the bone in the vents and the unknown animatronic in the vent that scares Chica and eats Mr. Cupcake.
True, but that would then imply that afton either dismantled the animatronics before fnaf 1 and they were rebuilt, William unspringlocks himself and then springlocks himself again in follow me, or someone else dismantles the animatronics in follow me
@@TerminalError I don't see why that would mean Afton respringlocked himself. It's described as an animatronic meaning he is in the vents as Springtrap, not Afton.
As for the animatronics being rebuilt, that's actually quite simple. We know they have spare Endoskeletons and full costumes in FNAF 1. And for why they are still haunted, the shells of the old animatronics are still here and are haunted. Plus, we know the animatronics poses the building in some way in the Week Before. Not to mention, Afton being Springlocked before FNAF 1 not only makes it, so you have to bend over backward to explain the saferooms being sealed phone call after Ralphs death. It also gives further credence to the idea that Michael is looking for Afton, and so he works at FNAF 1 trying to find him. (Before or After SL, it really doesn't matter)
Edit: Oh, you meant if Afton Springlocked himself before Follow Me and Follow Me is after FNAF 1.
26:20
Hello there old sport, Daveys back baby
Just found your channel, regardless of how convoluted and nonsensical, I'm really impressed you were able to tie the books characters like Edwin and the agony/remnant professors. Really unique spin on the fnaf timeline honestly, and your presentation is super engaging too!
The Mimic1 program/AI is based on Daisy, a DOS script/program from the 1990s / late 1980s. The Mimic body is based on Cog, a robot built by MIT in the early '90s. In both cases, the physical technology (the literal circuit boards, chips and so on) needed to build them is very similar to hardware available in the early 1980s. Edit: The Animatronics for Pirates of the Caribbean Ride were made in 1967, after several years in development.
19:30 I think that's how he figures out the Puppet is possessed (23:23 New Tear Tracks gained after Charlie's death = Possession, so he moves to the next stage of his plan to try to "recreate the accident" with the Funtimes), While CASSIDY is the cause behind Fredbear gaining black accessories, becoming Golden Freddy.
ADue to Fnaf 4 possibly implying CC is MORE connected to Fredbear (Based on Nightmare Fredbear)...
This means it's CASSIDY'S Possession that turns the accessories BLACK. Plus their colour in the Security Logbook with Black hair, Yellow Hair Ties, Blue/Cyan shirt.... which match Golden Freddy's Black Accessories, Yellow Fur and Movie GF/Fredbear in the SB posters have Blue/Cyan Eyes.
Meanwhile CC seems to have Freddy's colour scheme. Black Shirt, Brown Hair, Blue shorts.....While Freddy has Black Accessories, Brown Fur, and Blue Eyes.
Circus Baby's Pizza World has to have opened before Springlock Suits were retired, as they had a suit on hand.
Even if the 'unfortunate incident at the Sister Location' was something else, that tells us when the Springsuits were retired, as the tape AFTER that one mentions Springbonnie being moved and tells people not to bring customers into the safe room. The Springsuits started being phased out a little bit before the MCI, and were sealed up after the MCI in order to hide evidence before the place shut down. (While the exact language indicates a few suits at a few locations may have stayed in service for a bit, the last confirmed sighting of a springsuit is at the FNAF 2 location in 87, it was a spare not in service, and that happened before the place closed).
So Circus Baby's Pizza World was opened in mid 1985 and Elizabeth died right before the MCI. The Gas Leaks teaser implies the Rental Location opens months later(but probably not even a full calender year), so by 1986 the rental location should be up and running, which makes it very easy for Micheal to have gone there prior to FNAF 2, possibly right before FNAF 2.
I agree with some parts of this, but not all. Yes circus baby's needs opened before springlock suits were decommissioned and the wording of the phone call when they were decommissioned implies that some suits may not have been properly removed, I dont think the suits get discontinued immediately after the mci. The phone calls in fnaf 3 sound like they are pretty close to one another with how Ralph starts them off with things like "just a reminder" and "previously mentioned safe rooms." Plus as you said we hear about it in fnaf 2, and because follow me occurs in what looks like the fnaf 1 building, I dont think they get decommissioned/discontinued until some time before fnaf 1. The Week Before says they've been open for a bit already, and Ralph's daughter mentions fredbear. All of this leads me to think that the suits dont get removed until the fnaf 1 building where they then get sealed behind the safe room wall.
Also the grave order in Help Wanted 2 princess quest leads me to think that since we enter a sister location elevator after lighting the graves, Elizabeth's death comes after them meaning circus baby's opens between fnaf 1 and fnaf 2. I say take youre daughter to work day because of something in the week before where Ralph says he was glad he didn't bring Copellia to work on take your kid to work day making me think a big incident happened that day and the first bring your daughter to work day was 1993.
@@TerminalError If you wanna take the 'kid to work day' thing 100% literally you also have to take the Happiest Place on Earth trademark 100% literally which happened after that. Those after existed on a small scale run by specific companies or done informally since the 1950s, 1992 is just when it became a national holiday and 1993 is when it was first celebrated as one.
Cool video and theory
NGL I kinda fw the idea William built the Rockstars as a ruse to get FE to ignore the OG animatronics instead of Henry just building them for the sake of it in Fnaf 6
I'm glad you like it! I thought it was an interesting idea as well and something I dont see anyone really even considering. I get it might be wrong but I think it needs discussed at least.
@ Even if it's wrong it's still a really cool way to explain how the Rockstars came to be!
Criminally underrated, you deserve so many more views! Keep it up dood B)
Unless the original Fredbear is a clockwork Automaton (popular in the 1700s and 1800s with programable discs, such as the Writing Boy). Many were built with music boxes built into them and where meant to either appear to be performing the music or dancing to the music. Some where as small as a 16" doll and one Swan + it's own pond (which also animates) model which was the size of a long dining table.
I've been looking forward to this video coming out, and it is excellent! Thank you!
CLASSICS, TOYS, AND FOXY TOES, AS FAR AS SILVER EYES CAN SEE-
But only one is correct I wonder which timeline it is! This is the ultimate FNaF! The ultimate timeline!
I don't think this Fortnite timeline is 100% accurate. Like where is does "A link to the past" fit in here? And where is Hatsune Miku??????
Why did I think you were serious at first 😭
That all comes part 2 after Eminem battles himself and Freddy fazbear cranks 90s on kids
Ahhh I was so excited to watch part 2 cuz I’m cleaning but this was uploaded yesterday ahhhh will come back for part 2 🥰
I quite liked it! Was interesting that you think William came up with Lefty as well as a bunch of other animatronics people usually attribute to Henry
I personally think Henry is the games version of Edwin Murray, since he has no last name, loses his child in a car related accident, created vacuums (Mr hugs) and could theoretically have the last name Murray. I guess we’ll find out in SOTM hopefully
I think rye toast said this in a podcast or something but it's possible for Henry to take Edwin's role, but Edwin can't take henry's. They have similar stories but Henry is an owner of Freddy's while Edwin just works for them. Henry makes it clear that he wants nothing to do with Freddy's after fnaf 6 while Edwin returns to the pizzaplex in the books. And their kids server different purposes in the story. Charlie possesses the puppet to protect the kids and David teaches the Mimic how to play and gives it some of its characteristics.
I still don't like the idea that William built the Rockstars and Lefty around the time of FNAF 1. It's hard to believe the Rockstars were never put to use in the 30 years between FNAF 1 and FNAF 6. If theorists were supposed to figure that out, then the Rockstars being the face of FNAF 6 was really misleading on Scott's part. Anyone would naturally assume that the new set of animatronics were created for FNAF 6's restaurant, not decades prior to the game's events.
I dont think the rockstars weren't used in those 30 years. I thinks that's exactly how William was able to disassemble the originals in follow me. He made the rockstars, fazbear has a large enough budget to move to a new location, they take the new rockstar line instead of the originals. I think the other animatronics in fnaf 6 help support this. While we don't see any of these animatronics at older locations, we either know or can theorize that they are older animatronics from previous locations. Trash and the gang seem to be really old, parts of the mediocres are in "into the pit" the game showing they are at least from 1985, funtime chica is mentioned in source code around sister location, and the rockstars would be the newest and most advanced set we can purchase in the game because they came from the newest Freddy's location.
AN HOUR OF CONTENT
Went alittle crazy with this one
Dang, sorry about drawing a straight line. If only you had a ruler! 😂
Rulers are for nerds!!
10:46 thank you bro. the mimic and honestly the sister location animatronics have this issue.
I think sister location less so, but they do suffer a similar issue. The Mimic is just much worse since it's so early on in the timeline.
That's a damn nice suit sportsy.
Why thank you Dave!
love this interpretation. on your point about RTTP's MCI count, i agree that the MCI is 5 kids, however the ITP game, while showing 6, implies this 6th one is "special" somehow. i take this to mean that the 6th one (who's likely Andrew) died either shortly before or shortly after the MCI, but the agony of the ballpit generalised and lumped him in with the others killed during that time period. Furthermore, there's an ending in RTTP where we follow the yellow rabbit 2 days earlier than the scene where we see the MCI and there's already a kid dead in the storage room. this COULD be the 6th one
Ooh I like this idea a lot. I bought that book i just need to sit down and read it now.
If I have to go back and say 6 again, I'll be happy I was right the first time, but I might lose my mind
Oof, Circus Baby's between FNAF 2 and FNAF 1 is a big respectable swing. Though I will have to disagree. Between Baby's Birthday line on Thursday in FFPS and the 1587 code from Baby I think it's more like that Circus Baby's opened on July 1st, 1985.
I would agree that it seems like it comes out of nowhere, but I promise you there's some evidence. Like I said, I think it happens on take your daughter to work day but I got that from the week before which has a line saying Ralph is glad he didn't bring copellia on take your child to work day and they emphasize "especially not then". There's only 3 characters in the games with dead kids who work at Freddy's. Edwin, Henry, and William. From these 3, there's only 1 without a confirmed placement on the timeline and that's Elizabeth. After looking into take your child to work day, I found out that it first occurred in 1993 as a national holiday (first being called take your daughter to work day). Does this confirm my theory? No but I do think them including a holiday that can be traced back to close to fnaf 1 and singles out basically 1 character is a very interesting detail.
@@TerminalError My main criticism to that is that Elizabeth wasn't going to bring my child to work day. She was going to the first day the restaurant opened like everyone else. Plus, even if you wanted to argue, Elizabeth isn't going there as a normal child and only staying with William. I highly doubt the first day the restaurant was open was also bring your child to work day.
Plus, the community doesn't have a solid explanation for Baby's 1587 code other than it being the date she died as what else would it be. (We know it isn't her counting children as it contradicts the numbers she tells us for that).
I'm assuming the Mimic will mimic Charlie, which is why Henry keeps it around.
Here we go
The Blacked Out Cameras Is A Cool Observation Would Make More Sense If The Party Hallway's Was Also Blacked
Very true. I remembered that there were blacked out cams while recording and while checking i was hoping there's was a path that William could have taken in order to sneak in without getting caught. Didn't seem to be the case but I still think half the cams not working had something to do with it, my pea brain just couldn't put it together yet.
Schrodinger's sixth MCI victim. With that blood splatter beneath the table in the DCI minigame (I forget what it's specifically called), maybe Scott has always had a secret MCI victim in his back pocket.
But then, why six graves in 6? Should it be 7? Unless either a) the grave we thought was Charlie's is this victim, b) Charlie is the sixth victim (my personal headcanon) or c) they weren't in the fire and weren't put to rest properly, or d) they don't have a grave? Like they had no parents or their family thought they were a runaway or they were replaced with the dreaded ROBOT CHILD.
It still FEELS like a retcon. And if it's Andrew I'm going to be mad. I will die on the hill it'd be stupid to introduce a brand new character in the books just to make UCN more convoluted (he was probably in the books so Afton could live long emough to explode his evil goo everywhere so we can have more spooky stories)
20 seconds in my brain already hurts
Lmao, 20 seconds in is still the intro. You might just need an ibuprofen or something.
Commenting for the algorithm
Favorite comment
william making lefty is very interesting 👀
Weird theory saying William made the Rockstars and L.E.F.T.E. it fits, but not really, imo, it fits if Henry made L.E.F.T.E... I like it though.
You remind me of Weird Al. That's a good thing.
When was the bite of 83 referred to as the big bite? Not questioning the validity, just curious because I've never heard it called that before.
It's said by Ralph in the week before. The book where we play as phone guy
@@TerminalError ohhh okay, thank you!
Bros yappin
I don't dislike this timeline, I just wish people had a different perspective with Fredbear. I never like how people's conclusion is "becomes Golden Freddy" it's so saturated man.
It's a logical conclusion, isn't it? Dave is probably connected to Golden Freddy, he got bitten by Fredbear, and with Scott doubling down on the yellow suit (FNAF 2, The Silver Eyes, he was originally called something like yellow bear before golden Freddy took over) which is likely a spring lock suit, I don't really know where else Golden Freddy came from. Maybe if he was a pure hallucination?
@@Alkeeros Just because he's a yellow bear doesn't automatically mean he's another Yellow bear. Lmao. Besides we literally have DREADBEAR. Dreadbear who mind you, has a large upper body with a large head, big teeth, and not to mention the brain association and the FNAF 4 references with him. He's not just a "halloween DLC character" he's Fredbear. In the flesh. Golden Freddy I don't think is THE Fredbear. Besides there's multiple versions of characters, it doesn't mean there can only be one fredbear. There's not one Springbonnie, why would it stop there? If you want my opinion, Golden Freddy is **a** Fredbear, but not **THE** Fredbear.
However I would never call Golden Freddy the one that caused the bite of 83. That's such a boring idea.
I pretty sure Edwins wife dies giving birth to their son.
I appreciate trying to draw a straight line, but to my autistic brain it very clearly has a slight concavity towards the bottom of the board that I can't ignore.
It's straight... it the space it crosses is slightly curved lol
honestly, your timeline might be most comprehensive one yet, like, I can actually show this to someone who's never heard of fnaf before and, in only over an hour, they can understand the entire first half of the story pretty well(with a few loose threads thanks to secret of the mimic and the new books). you didn't go in any unnecessary or incoherent tangents, the theories you selected were by far the best ones at telling a complete story(even if the evidence for some are a but dry), and you managed to connect everything very effectively, I mean, I got nothing on this, just- good job!
i thought the mci was just 5 kids, since the fnaf 1 news papers say that
The idea for this theory is basically "what if a sixth child was murdered in the same time period, by William, but it never got reported to the newspapers/connected to the other deaths.
Youre correct that the fnaf 1 nespaper says that but into the pit the book, graphic novel, and game all say 6. Not sure why now that return to the pit (the same story just as a choose your own adventure) says 5
I came to sleep ty
Crazy vid to sleep to (i feel like i get loud and go on too many crazy tangents) but thank you!
Making up a conversation between two characters is too oddly specific, assumes too much about personality, motive and reaction.