What a game I watched this on take take take was good to see a board instead of an analysis engine was different but in a good way any how this game was awesome what a way to start. Love from New Zealand
Come on. The move a5 (evtl. combined with a4) is a common theme in these structures. And pushes of a- or h-pawns in many different positions were a trademark of Bent Larsen 50 years ago. I'm so tired of these AI-prayers. - Thanks for this recap anyway.
Yes. AI just mostly rediscovers and combines all human chess understanding in one 'player'. I think it's easier to study Alpha0 games than digest all the chess books, courses, videos. Some people say for average chess players to copy AI is like us looking at birds and try to fly. I disagree. I am not trying to be as good as Alpha0, I just want to be a better chess player by learning from how Alpha0 plays. If you gain enough understanding and experience, learning from AI strategies is no difference from learning from all the best human players.
@@sunway1374You clearly have a point. But I do not fully agree. The development of ideas and the human perspective on them is essential for me. Not to talk about chess culture and chess history.
Thank you both!
Glad to see Howell and Houska still involved. Great review!
AMAZING ANALYSIS HERE, THANK YOU. VERY UNDERSTANDABLE, LOVE IT. 👍👍
Phenomenal game!
Bring back Dubov for recap analysis please
What a game I watched this on take take take was good to see a board instead of an analysis engine was different but in a good way any how this game was awesome what a way to start. Love from New Zealand
Come on. The move a5 (evtl. combined with a4) is a common theme in these structures. And pushes of a- or h-pawns in many different positions were a trademark of Bent Larsen 50 years ago. I'm so tired of these AI-prayers. - Thanks for this recap anyway.
Yes. AI just mostly rediscovers and combines all human chess understanding in one 'player'. I think it's easier to study Alpha0 games than digest all the chess books, courses, videos.
Some people say for average chess players to copy AI is like us looking at birds and try to fly. I disagree. I am not trying to be as good as Alpha0, I just want to be a better chess player by learning from how Alpha0 plays.
If you gain enough understanding and experience, learning from AI strategies is no difference from learning from all the best human players.
@@sunway1374You clearly have a point. But I do not fully agree. The development of ideas and the human perspective on them is essential for me. Not to talk about chess culture and chess history.
Bring back dubov