@@vacamood How about a businessman that turned billions of dollars into millions. Trump would actually have been far wealthier if he just kept it in the bank/stock market instead of all his failed grift businessess. The man can turn dollars into pennies and you people would still clap...
Not at all. Vox really understated how left wing she is. Harris was the second-most liberal member of the Senate when she served from 2017 to 2021 (source: DW-NOMINATE). Everything from trillion dollar climate change bills to price caps/rent control. Being a prosecutor does not negate all of that.
Easy to say, but implementing it is something different entirely. Unfortunately , from her ACTIONS, Kamala doesn't seems to implement that principal very much..
I think this actually exposes her tendency to lack a clear position on policies. And her wanting more information is actually just saying she wants to know which stance will make her do better in polls versus taking a stance on what she actually believes in.
@@soniarollins7131 A millionaire married to a Hollywood lawyer who worked for a defense industry lobbying company. She wants to pretend to be from the middle class so much 😎
Again, I’m going to say that you people do not understand you’re dealing with an educated and highly experienced prosecutor. the decision to not answer a question has a reason behind it that for her is hugely valid and she uses her experience.
@@twittertwice she may not necessarily be informed in the matters of politics though, because her law background requires meticulous research towards an answer, but if put on the spot… maybe she’ll deflect if she doesn’t have the answers. Which she may not always have…
@@twittertwice yeah man, like how she kept her mouth shut when Tulsi Gabbard said she locked up and kept 15,000 black men in prison on weed charges. Real smart, there was nothing she could've said.
Her hesitancy in a stance some stances shows she thinks before she speaks. And she does not speak on things she doesnt know… speaks volumes compared to Trump’s lies and empty promises built in fear planting
That is such a favorable and imbalanced interpretation of her actions. You realize chameleon would be a better descriptor? She keeps her finger in the wind to determine her politics, meaning she is a political operative and cannot be trusted to hold firm when put to the test. A leader is one who LEADS. A president should be a leader and a visionary and principled. A chameleon would be none of these things. A chameleon "leads from behind" by hiding until the coast is clear and then opportunistically emerges.
These people commenting this have to be doublespeak bots… she doesn’t believe in anything except power. Her belief solely depends on what the majority thinks, or what she thinks they may think.
I know very little about her, but I can definitely appreciate a politician who takes the time to learn about an issue before taking a position. If we had more people like that, I don’t think our nation would be so polarized…
But she wasn’t just learning before taking a position. She was refusing to take a position because she knew it would be unpopular. She wouldn’t say what her position on marijuana legalization was because she knew she couldn’t say she supported it, but also didn’t want to say she was opposed.
she's just an establishment politician; hated by the normal working man but inexplicably loved and supported by the media and corporations. Basically, she'll just tow the neo-Liberal party line just like the others. You already know her beliefs and policies even without knowing anything about her because they're not her beliefs and policies, they're the beliefs and policies of the establishment and the corporations, media, military and other organisations that work together to form the establishment. When are people going to realise that it doesn't matter which party or politician is in charge, what actually matters is the establishment AKA "the system". she's identical to every other establishment-chosen Western politician, so no doubt she'll do the bidding of the "Wurld Ekonomic Four-um" (I had to misspell it to avoid censorship) just like every other Western politican. We need politicians who are of the people, not politicians who are of the establishment.
"She usually checks the vibe of how people are feeling first before she gives her opinion" I mean... that's a good thing as a politician who's supposed to be representative of the people, no?
I think that the quote is supposed to contrast from a Bernie type. Someone who was ahead of the curve and had the conviction to stand by their beliefs even if it wasn’t popular or representative of the people (at the time).
Until a certain point, if you vote for someone, you vote for them because of the opinions they already have, not the ones they will make/feel out during their mandate.
@@JackRivera-sn7xh ...so let me clarify: you're saying that checking with your constituents & team members that you represent before you make a statement or decision = all you care about is power???
Anyone serious needs to see Tulsi Gabbards dismanteling of Kamala. She is an installed candidate who kept prisoners in jail for her personal benefit. No one voted for her. Its either Trump or Kennedy unless you want more endless wars and gaslighting.
Yeah, they want the consolidation of wealth, power, resources. They want to take rights away from those with families and "give" them to people who sterilize themselves. They DONT want it to go back to the way it was NOR do they want to make American great. America is just another banana republic to milked like tax chattel as far as they're concerned.
I’d like to see the same “fair”assessment of trump. All of these points were positive. She has no foreign policy stances which in my opinion is the most important thing at the moment.
It’s a bunch of women telling us this woman is a good choice? This “journalism” is promoting a woman asking men hard questions without saying she’s being sexist? Whenever a man asks a woman tough questions the men are accused of being sexist, but when the tables turn it’s now okay?
@@thenub6304 all the assessments of trump have been fair. i don't think he's done anything positive other than tough on china. other than that his negative coverage is entirely justified
The fact that the “we’re not going back” phrase literally a fire under her campaign is because this is what people feel passionately about out. The best part of this is that that phrase came out completely natural.
When people say "we're not going back", they mean they're not going back to her failed policies & having her back in office. The Harris-Biden has failed miserably.
You don't necessarily need to know her policies! What one needs to know of our President is that individual has common respect, decency, empathy, integrity and honor for the most highest position in our nation! One that actually cares to be well informed on the issue that affects ALL Americans, not just one party of ideals! One who can work to bring our nation together and not divide us apart! A President that will think before they speak and think of everyone and not themselves or the elite rich that fund and shape their views and one that does not try to overthrow our institutions of law but rather respects and honors them!
@@damienschoop9826this has nothing to do with presidency and tbh nothing u said has anything to do with office what we need is better prices better defense more security and more police you are delusional none of what u said will protect u when the 💣 come
@@damienschoop9826I’m just saying your happy with how things are If so you must come from money because everybody I know is bleeding rn no one can afford anything and if u live in California or New York you’d see just how bad times are right now why hasn’t Kamala and Joe fixed it yet because they can’t they don’t know how you call that competent to run this country
- Good at asking questions, can't answer a single one. - Good at holding others accountable, can't be held accountable herself. - Catches wind of a buzzword and uses it, has no idea of her own.
Probably did some media training behind the scenes. If she gets elected she'll need to be a master of politics and a master of handling the traditional media as well as social media. We've seen what happens to a president who is none of those things thanks to Biden.
@@vacamood trying to shoehorn this argument into several unrelated comments only shows how desperate you are. surely you have more than one argument... right?
I think Kamala’s career, regardless of opinions on her policy or as a person, has been so interesting. Watching how the way she presents her positions over time, and the differences in how she’s been seen as a tough, effective senator to clumsy, memey VP to a sudden beacon of hope for the Democratic Party has been so unusual
I never saw her as a tough or effective Senator. She was a soapboxing grandstanding Senator who did not possess the additional element of eloquence to win hearts and minds.
@@LoveForBluebirds we all have our own opinions but it was a rather popular perception that she was effective in her questioning as a senator, and was more well received there than in her word soup streak as VP
@@maximuscraig8222 Ok comparison serves as a useful tool here. Rate her ability to speak in comparison to Obama. Obama was 100. Harris is like a 25. Compare her ability to articulate policy positions in comparison to Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders during media interviews. Sanders and Warren are excellent. Harris is yet again like a 10 out of 100 because she DOES NOT know how to speak properly to convey or persuade. She is not only a chameleon of a politician, she is a bad politician because she cannot even persuade with words even as a flip flopper.
If you guys think a 13-minute video is enough to explain a candidate to you, this is part of the problem. Please take the time to listen to the full speeches and discourses of both candidates, whether you like them or not, use your brain and form your own opinion on whether you should vote for them or not. It's really that simple, don't let the media control your thoughts, instead form your own.
But even if you really look at a fair assessment between the two you would choose Trump because he had more achievements despite his short and brutal experience than Kamala who can't even control the border.
I think she would have done better if the DNC held a primary race and she had won that contest. For the DNC to just tell us that she is their candidate for 2024 was the wrong way to start a run for the PotUS.
competent civil servant? she wanted to defund the police and allowed or atleast participated in the illegal entrance of millions of illegal migrants into america, does that scream competent civil service?
The fact that men don't have the ability to carry a child for nine months doesn't mean they can't have an option on whether or not a human being that has done nothing wrong should live
@@EzzyFramesit isn’t a human being yet nor does the opinion of a man get to dictate the choice of keeping it for them. All people are asking for is a choice on the matter.
@@EzzyFramesJust because women don't have penises doesn't mean they aren't entitled to their opinion that the government can forcibly circumcise every man to protect innocent others from cancer!
I have a friend who is a DA and while she does prosecute criminals, many under the age of 18, she also works hard to advocate for them to make sure they are brought to restorative justice. She was shot while working at her parents restaruant during a robbery, which motivated her to do this work. Talk about loving thy enemy. There are good people out there doing good work. They are far from perfect but who is? This piece reminded me of her.
no tax on tips baby! she also gonna be tough on borders and attack inflation on day 1, drill baby drill! its gonna be great. TRUMP YOU'RE FIRED! ...wait a minute..
I agree with most people on here, this was a fair assessment of vice president Harris. I also think that it is totally okay that her views on certain issues are not set in stone and she does consider what other people say or think, i'd rather have a politician who is open to ideas and isnt so closed off.
Any piece that ends with a wholly positive conclusion, like this does, isn't "fair." It is a finger on the scale. The grayer areas, light criticisms at best, discussed earlier in the piece, are included only to give weight to that final messaging.
Of course, any politician with a brain in their head is likely to change policy positions given the changes that are going on in the world. That’s not a flip-flop necessarily, most often it’s because situations just changes and options have changed. I don’t need somebody who said in stone when the ground is eroding beneath them. I need someone who sees a situation and addresses that situation for what it is at the moment and is capable of changing that assessment when the situation changes.
@@twittertwice Doing 180's and ALSO not following through to begin with... Say what? Harris is not that; she's what's known in politics as a paper bag.
No, you kinda *like her* or whatever agenda you feel she aligns with that you also align with. If someone you *disliked* did that it would instead be a point of attack.
LOL okay so when is she going to solve the border crisis??? We need someone to get on these issues and not just 'feel' them out. What qualities do you even want as a president if you consider kamala?
I’ve always felt these things about Kamala but never knew how to really put it into proper words. But yes she has a deep conviction but yet has nothing to be convicting for. That’s why it surprised me with how many people are demanding to know what her policies are. She’s just gonna be a continuation of Biden with some minor changes. She’s not very inventive but give her a cause she can rationally get behind and she brings that prosecutor energy. That’s why the campaign has had such momentum right now. In her mind this is primarily “beat Donald Trump” and it’s proving successful for the time being.
I agree, and this why I really like Walz as her VP as he does have those qualities she lacks. Always gotta remember we're not just voting for the one person, we're also voting for the team of individuals around that person. She can be uninventive but if the team around her is progressive and she's willing to steer in that direction that's a net positive IMO
Are you blind? Kamala Harris paints and preaches about HER OWN picture. She has more than proved she is capable of being the President of the United States. You sound jealous. Didn't anyone ever inform you that jealousy is petty and shallow? Because it is and you are
She’s spend her prosecutorial career locking up black men and laughing about it when she’s asked if she smoked weed. She’s a phoney and would make very bad socialist policies.
@@jeongbun2386wasn’t it creepy Joe? and now it’s weird trump lol so original. I’m surprised no one’s calling her pig since hating/defunding cops is a thing for some democrats.
Appreciate Vox news for showing Boths the good side and bad sides of Kamala. Many new sites only talk good about the person who they favor (cough cough Fox News & CNN) but never the bads.
I’m not sure how they could give you a bad side of Kamala Harris, who is extremely well prepared to become president of the United. I likely think they told you what they didn’t like about her. It doesn’t mean it’s a bad side of her, it just means that whoever wrote it or who is every speaking about it disagrees with her..
As a foreigner I cannot grasp why people are elected for a spot like district attorney. It sounds wrong to me that people must campaign and run for that function (or even for judge). The executive and legislative branches are supposed to be accessible via elections, but judicial functions? District attorney, prosecutor? Madness
I agree with you. In Dutch we have a concept we've termed the "rechtstaat" which is considered to be a sort of fundamental state of being for our society possibly best compared with the phrase "a nation of laws" if it must be translated into English. Essentially it means the state is itself bound by law and legal rights and justice are not (supposed to be) subject to political whims and arbitrary despotism. It's why our courts and judges are not politically appointed and even the public prosecutors are nominally independent from politics and government. I could sort of understand the appeal of elected public prosecutors in the sense that the people might be deciding what they feel is important to pursue or if they want to show trust in the competence of the prosecutor. But elected judges seems absurd, especially when they campaign on ideology and values. Generally the law should be their only measure. That being said, I live in one of the many countries that has a codified legal code, and the USA has a hybrid system heavily leaning towards common law which places defining what justice is almost completely with the judge.
I guess that's why people think California is weird. Californians have more say in things than in some other states. Can even put Propositions on the ballot with enough signatures.
American politics feel like high school politics to me - the louder, the most visible, the richer ones have the best chances, not the most qualified ones.
why? because you want a radical socialist, the most radical ticket VP and President in US history? and the least popular vice president who was chosen to be the next president by NOBODY. that is not hopeless, that is shameful and disgraceful
I have confidence in her but I hope she has learned from her mistakes. She must make it crystal clear what she stands for and be carefull in using language that everyone can understand.
I wish she'd talk about policies instead of platitudes. The language thing is simple to do. She obstinates her questions on purpose as a way to not answer policy questions.
How could you possibly have confidence in her? She is currently VP and failing miserably at it. She has no platform or policies. Her whole campaign is don't vote Trump.
@@aaronjustice2566 I'm mainly hearing about Trump about him dissing Kamala about her racial background. I really don't think dissing people should be questioned for campaigns.
Yeah and let’s bring out megan the stallion to twerk on stage because that’s what we think about our black voters! News flash, She’s failing miserably at what she can “hopefully” do.
No reference to what her metrics actually were to measure “smart on crime” California’s crime, homelessness, and enablement of disorderly and destabilizing conduct is outrageous and societally destructive. Her ambiguity on issues seems like an attempt to be absolved of accountability.
Check the interview she did in 2010 with Google. Idk her stats after being elected as AG, but they can be easily googled. Have you lived in California?
I do live in CA. She's part of the horrible problems Cali has and she will just spread those same problems to the rest of the country. Crime is worse but so much wrong is now not a "crime" so they cam throw all sorts of false "statistics" around. And then there are the straight up LIES, endless desemblance...
6:44 “who here would abolish their private health insurance in favour of a government-run plan?”. We have such a thing here in the UK. We don’t have to pay for healthcare. It’s free and we are so grateful for it
Maybe UK is not the best example for it, since your system is not in a great shape in the recent years (as far as I know)... But there is a lots of great examples about it across Europe.
Same here in Canada. I'm from the UK, and I've lived in the US. I have family there. Our system -as with the NHS - is under serious strain. But that's because of deliberate underfunding and neglect by successive governments. Though I think it's been particularly pernicious over 14 years of Tory rule in the UK. Conservatives everywhere seek to starve and break any and all social programs. The benefits of a healthy, well educated society is not their priority. They are motivated strictly by self interest and prefer a system that subjugates most people for the benefit of the few, as long as they are part of the few. And the most important thing from their perspective is to consolidate their positions so as to ensure that remains the case.
A lot of the stuff about she's going to check out the temperature before she stakes out a position is stuff you could say about many politicians. Joe Biden, Barack Obama, many others.
There’s nothing wrong with changing your mind. If policy makers changed their mind based on the body of evidence and public opinion more often, our country would be better for it. I hope our generation becomes the generation that finally does away with the narrative that changing your mind is “flip flopping”, and that flip flopping is bad thing. Flip flopping based on where the body evidence currently sits is a good thing. I wish every politician flip flopped more often. If they did, government policy wouldn’t be so far behind public opinion on basically every issue. Policy lags behind shifting public opinion and leads to issues where there is a large consensus being completely irrelevant to government policy on those issues for like two decades before policy actually changes to meet the consensus of experts and the consensus of the public.
What a joke. 3 months ago she was being hidden because of her incompetence. Now we're supposed to believe she's this great person capable of running the United States of America?!? Nah. Democrats like me are waking up to the lies.
Very true, just a year ago they were talking about her not being on the ticket with Joe Biden during the election because of how unpopular she was but now she’s somehow the presidential nominee.
Its suuuper easy to look tough on the attack, when asking questions. Whatever your policy position, as long as it aligns with yours it makes a politician look good. Its not as impressive as people make it out to be.
“Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine.”
@@jooo8673so is her assessment of the passage of time and its importance. At least I can take comfort in the fact that my 6 year old will be able to understand her speeches.
Does it make you "feel" better to remember a glory moment. That was a learning moment for both of them but apparently only one of them learned and evolved. The other is irrelevant.
@@devanman7920 Your answer should have been: (Yes, remembering that moment makes me "feel" better. I don't like Kamala and hate that things are looking positive for her. ) Also D, If I was ignoring anything, I would not be here! What I'm actually doing here is the opposite of ignoring. Its a win, win though. You feel good regarding a debate in 2019. I feel good that the former prosecutor, senator, Attorney General, Vp may become Prez. You keep holding onto that debate like a coping blanket. Peace ✌
I did look it up. I also saw that Tulsi Gabbard's views on abortion, climate, gun control, have evolved. After quitting the Democratic party in 2022, she gave up her radical views and seems to be drifting into the Rump orbit.
@@devanman7920 So basically, look at my echo chamber example that has a title which makes it obvious who the video creator favours… and don’t search fair debate titled videos with her in it? And people wonder why a large chunk of US citizens are easily manipulated, yet delusional that they aren’t? 😂🤦♂️
She always raves about her career as a prosecutor or attorney in CA but as pro-Far Left , she believes in the rights of criminals so criminals can be released easily; crime goes up with no consequences for criminals and at the same time there are "no" police to defend citizens as she favors defunding police (funds rerouted elsewhere). She wanted open borders so she didn’t want to go to the border to see reality and not even respect the Texas patrols working so hard to control the area. She didn’t care about her fellow American workers. Does Kamala ever tell her supporters that these illegally entering immigrants have priority in their housing, food, healthcare, etc.? US citizens are not a priority! These recent immigrants will be supported by our hard earned dollars (all kinds of taxes on us) but everything will be free for them. Kamala paints a flowery image for us like we'll have a better life (housing, work/pay, Medicare, food, gasoline, etc.) after she becomes President but she is only fooling her supporters because they are not thinking sensibly or seriously and not questioning her. Their life or their parents life will not be better, just like it is now but worse when we actually see where we are taken.
She just has a few vague, trite ideas like lowering the prices at the grocery store and building more homes. Nothing about the job side of the economy, increasing wages, improving the job market, etc. Just vagueness after vagueness.
Tulsi said enough for me. i started skipping school at 14. I was boy with a single mom. If the gov had locked her up for that I would have been much worse
Always a happy surprise to see a balanced take on issues. Every idea has a good and bad side. Hearing good journalism point out both of them gives me some hope for a healthy discourse in America.
We’re not going back ! Not going back to what? You mean: Low interest rates Low gas prices Lower food costs No major wars Lower housing prices Less crime Secure border
@@jagsanthanamits easy to attack, ask probing questions. Give me somebody willing to say something controversial because they believe in it any day. A liar sticks their finger to the wind and says whatever they think the audience wants to hear.
Not a lot of promises just "we're not going back" ok but are we going ahead ? or just keeping status quo ? Cause America desperately needs a lot of change
The way she grills people testifying in committee hearings makes it absolutely clear that she was a prosecutor, and a really, really good one at that. Those were cross examinations and she absolutely obliterated the defense’s whole narrative every time she grilled a witness. 😂
4:08 She tries to get an answer from Barr. Barr says he was not asked so she tries to get him to say he was asked informally followed by "you don't know"; basically putting words in his mouth that Barr did not say at all. At 4:27 when Barr tries to explain his position she shuts him down. While this might work in court when trying to win an argument this is not how a president / CEO should run things. She's grandstanding rather than trying to get answers. "How panicked were you when you couldn't find toilet paper"?
The funny part is the only thing I remember when she was DA in SF was the drug lab scandal. No smartphones back then. I barely used the internet in my off time. I probably read the local paper more by paper than online.
Great at asking tough questions, but she herself is not answering the american people how she is going to make life more affordable for americans, border crisis, negotiate peace in war zones. She says useless stuff and doesn't make any sense.
She says that she wants to learn all information before giving her opinion, but that just makes me feel like how really uninformed is she before giving a press conference? She’s not that intelligent people I live in California, California and what’s happened to our state is a shame. she only cares about numbers that look good, but in fact aren’t
@@johncrichter that’s what I’m saying she never took on cases that she new she couldn’t win or make a political statement with. Prosecutors are really horrible people and they never see the good in humanity .
It's genuinely frightening to me how a politician who had some of the worst approval ratings in history can be so quickly repackaged to the clueless masses with such speed and efficiency. Her years of hare-brained appearances magically disappeared. Telling voters that a candidate who can't and won't speak to the media is simply thoughtful. I have watched her carefully stage managed career from the time she started dating Willie Brown and insinuating herself into the very wealthy elite of San Francisco. She stands for nothing but her own ambition. As a DA, AG, and Senator i can't think of one good thing she did for California, and when she was actually running for president instead of being installed, California voters rejected her soundly. She is the ultimate sign of the complete decay and ruin of American politics.
Thank you for your opinion. I'm sure successful prosecutors win their cases with word salad, not by building a structure of facts using progressive logic.
all you need to know about her is she did *_NOT_* just fall out of a coconut tree.
What, did it happened years ago?
@@vacamoodgirliepop.
Brat360 (edit music, really nice laugh)
@@vacamood How about a businessman that turned billions of dollars into millions. Trump would actually have been far wealthier if he just kept it in the bank/stock market instead of all his failed grift businessess. The man can turn dollars into pennies and you people would still clap...
The US elections have instantly turned from "Anyone but Biden" to "Anyone but Trump". 😂
hm I was expecting this to be a total pro-Kamala puff piece but it was actually pretty fair and even-handed?
this actually made her more relatable because people are complex and have different options at different points in their lives.
Not at all. Vox really understated how left wing she is. Harris was the second-most liberal member of the Senate when she served from 2017 to 2021 (source: DW-NOMINATE). Everything from trillion dollar climate change bills to price caps/rent control. Being a prosecutor does not negate all of that.
@@the0ne809 Except Kamala has a different opinion on something every other day.
@@gldjvsnjme too. Shows growth
@@the0ne809the woman is unhinged. I'm not sure she even knows where she stands most of the time
"I want to be well informed before I give my opinion" is something we really need again.
Easy to say, but implementing it is something different entirely. Unfortunately , from her ACTIONS, Kamala doesn't seems to implement that principal very much..
Everybody should use this line at work.
@@norsie45 principle*
@@ContentNot it’s good until she has to make a quick decision for the betterment of the country.
I think this actually exposes her tendency to lack a clear position on policies. And her wanting more information is actually just saying she wants to know which stance will make her do better in polls versus taking a stance on what she actually believes in.
You guys forgot to mention that she was raised as a middle class kid
Lol. Born to an Indian woman coming from a rich Indian family and raised in a wealthy neighborhood in Montreal.
@@engma2006they rented a third floor of a house in a “rich” neighborhood 🙄
@@soniarollins7131 A millionaire married to a Hollywood lawyer who worked for a defense industry lobbying company. She wants to pretend to be from the middle class so much 😎
@@engma2006 the same could be said about silver spoon Trump pretending to work at McDonald’s, support the military, and hold Christian values
Upper middle class.
"She's great at asking questions but not answering them" is a great take
Again, I’m going to say that you people do not understand you’re dealing with an educated and highly experienced prosecutor. the decision to not answer a question has a reason behind it that for her is hugely valid and she uses her experience.
@@twittertwice she may not necessarily be informed in the matters of politics though, because her law background requires meticulous research towards an answer, but if put on the spot… maybe she’ll deflect if she doesn’t have the answers.
Which she may not always have…
@@twittertwice yeah man, like how she kept her mouth shut when Tulsi Gabbard said she locked up and kept 15,000 black men in prison on weed charges. Real smart, there was nothing she could've said.
😂
speaking is silver, silence is golden.
Her hesitancy in a stance some stances shows she thinks before she speaks. And she does not speak on things she doesnt know… speaks volumes compared to Trump’s lies and empty promises built in fear planting
gaslighting ultra promax 😂😂
That is such a favorable and imbalanced interpretation of her actions. You realize chameleon would be a better descriptor? She keeps her finger in the wind to determine her politics, meaning she is a political operative and cannot be trusted to hold firm when put to the test. A leader is one who LEADS. A president should be a leader and a visionary and principled. A chameleon would be none of these things. A chameleon "leads from behind" by hiding until the coast is clear and then opportunistically emerges.
These people commenting this have to be doublespeak bots… she doesn’t believe in anything except power. Her belief solely depends on what the majority thinks, or what she thinks they may think.
Ignorance thrives on fear mongering.
@@LoveForBluebirdsorrr…understanding the voices of the people in order to compromise and make smart decisions?
I know very little about her, but I can definitely appreciate a politician who takes the time to learn about an issue before taking a position. If we had more people like that, I don’t think our nation would be so polarized…
But she wasn’t just learning before taking a position. She was refusing to take a position because she knew it would be unpopular. She wouldn’t say what her position on marijuana legalization was because she knew she couldn’t say she supported it, but also didn’t want to say she was opposed.
She's not taking time to learn the issue, she's taking time to learn how to actually do her job
she's been VP of the country for 4 years. what more time does she need to learn about issues
she's just an establishment politician; hated by the normal working man but inexplicably loved and supported by the media and corporations.
Basically, she'll just tow the neo-Liberal party line just like the others. You already know her beliefs and policies even without knowing anything about her because they're not her beliefs and policies, they're the beliefs and policies of the establishment and the corporations, media, military and other organisations that work together to form the establishment.
When are people going to realise that it doesn't matter which party or politician is in charge, what actually matters is the establishment AKA "the system". she's identical to every other establishment-chosen Western politician, so no doubt she'll do the bidding of the "Wurld Ekonomic Four-um" (I had to misspell it to avoid censorship) just like every other Western politican.
We need politicians who are of the people, not politicians who are of the establishment.
I agree
Who's here after the election?
I'm very clear with you why you're xxxleaving with you it's not worth it
Me
Right here. And there’s that hyena laugh. Someone please show her this
"She usually checks the vibe of how people are feeling first before she gives her opinion" I mean... that's a good thing as a politician who's supposed to be representative of the people, no?
I think that the quote is supposed to contrast from a Bernie type. Someone who was ahead of the curve and had the conviction to stand by their beliefs even if it wasn’t popular or representative of the people (at the time).
Until a certain point, if you vote for someone, you vote for them because of the opinions they already have, not the ones they will make/feel out during their mandate.
She seems to do well with the elementary school lunch table.
What? It means she doesn’t truly believe in anything except for power… extremely dangerous for a politician.
@@JackRivera-sn7xh ...so let me clarify: you're saying that checking with your constituents & team members that you represent before you make a statement or decision = all you care about is power???
I think this was a fair assessment of VP Harris.
"What Can Be, Unburdened By What Has Been" Kamala Harris
i think so too. the positive and the negative. just like everyone else.
Anyone serious needs to see Tulsi Gabbards dismanteling of Kamala. She is an installed candidate who kept prisoners in jail for her personal benefit. No one voted for her. Its either Trump or Kennedy unless you want more endless wars and gaslighting.
Yeh not at all, they left out a ton!
@@jonah9250interesting like what?
"NOT GOING BACK" is directly antithetical to "Make America Great Again". Brilliant.
Yes. "NOT GOING BACK" is anti-American.
So I take it you're voting for Trump because you don't want to go back again
Yeah, they want the consolidation of wealth, power, resources. They want to take rights away from those with families and "give" them to people who sterilize themselves. They DONT want it to go back to the way it was NOR do they want to make American great. America is just another banana republic to milked like tax chattel as far as they're concerned.
How lost are you?
Exactly, let's NOT make America great again 😂
The US dodged a bullet with this one
Balanced coverage. This is what good journalism should do. Need more of this.
well said!
I’d like to see the same “fair”assessment of trump. All of these points were positive. She has no foreign policy stances which in my opinion is the most important thing at the moment.
It’s a bunch of women telling us this woman is a good choice? This “journalism” is promoting a woman asking men hard questions without saying she’s being sexist? Whenever a man asks a woman tough questions the men are accused of being sexist, but when the tables turn it’s now okay?
@@thenub6304 all the assessments of trump have been fair. i don't think he's done anything positive other than tough on china. other than that his negative coverage is entirely justified
@@thenub6304can I ask whats Trump foreign policy? Bc he has just said: I will solve the problems. Without explaining how
The fact that the “we’re not going back” phrase literally a fire under her campaign is because this is what people feel passionately about out. The best part of this is that that phrase came out completely natural.
When people say "we're not going back", they mean they're not going back to her failed policies & having her back in office. The Harris-Biden has failed miserably.
When you watch the video it's actually really cool to see her start to realize that's her new slogan.
Your ignorant
Yep we are not going back to Harris Biden terrible economics
Yeah, she means we're never going back to sanity, common sense and prosperity. Democrats did that.
"You may be the first to do many things, but make sure you are not the last" is such beautiful and powerful advice. Her mother was a wise woman.
my SIL & i have sweatshirts that say this and we wear them still 🤍
I love that quote. It focuses not just on our own actions for progress but also encourages others to be part of that effort
You don't necessarily need to know her policies! What one needs to know of our President is that individual has common respect, decency, empathy, integrity and honor for the most highest position in our nation! One that actually cares to be well informed on the issue that affects ALL Americans, not just one party of ideals! One who can work to bring our nation together and not divide us apart! A President that will think before they speak and think of everyone and not themselves or the elite rich that fund and shape their views and one that does not try to overthrow our institutions of law but rather respects and honors them!
@@damienschoop9826this has nothing to do with presidency and tbh nothing u said has anything to do with office what we need is better prices better defense more security and more police you are delusional none of what u said will protect u when the 💣 come
@@damienschoop9826I’m just saying your happy with how things are If so you must come from money because everybody I know is bleeding rn no one can afford anything and if u live in California or New York you’d see just how bad times are right now why hasn’t Kamala and Joe fixed it yet because they can’t they don’t know how you call that competent to run this country
- Good at asking questions, can't answer a single one.
- Good at holding others accountable, can't be held accountable herself.
- Catches wind of a buzzword and uses it, has no idea of her own.
This explains why she was absent from the media and haven’t heard from her, but it looks like she has grown into her role.
🤮sycophant
Probably did some media training behind the scenes. If she gets elected she'll need to be a master of politics and a master of handling the traditional media as well as social media. We've seen what happens to a president who is none of those things thanks to Biden.
@@vacamood That's a lie. You watch to much Fox News.
@@vacamood trying to shoehorn this argument into several unrelated comments only shows how desperate you are. surely you have more than one argument... right?
@kingace6186 i lived in SF during her tenure. Shes a disaster.
Looks like the troons are angry.
I think Kamala’s career, regardless of opinions on her policy or as a person, has been so interesting. Watching how the way she presents her positions over time, and the differences in how she’s been seen as a tough, effective senator to clumsy, memey VP to a sudden beacon of hope for the Democratic Party has been so unusual
What happened? She now seems like she has been eating lead paint chips.
same thing can be said about Trump and his trajectory to president
I never saw her as a tough or effective Senator. She was a soapboxing grandstanding Senator who did not possess the additional element of eloquence to win hearts and minds.
@@LoveForBluebirds we all have our own opinions but it was a rather popular perception that she was effective in her questioning as a senator, and was more well received there than in her word soup streak as VP
@@maximuscraig8222 Ok comparison serves as a useful tool here. Rate her ability to speak in comparison to Obama. Obama was 100. Harris is like a 25. Compare her ability to articulate policy positions in comparison to Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders during media interviews. Sanders and Warren are excellent. Harris is yet again like a 10 out of 100 because she DOES NOT know how to speak properly to convey or persuade. She is not only a chameleon of a politician, she is a bad politician because she cannot even persuade with words even as a flip flopper.
If you guys think a 13-minute video is enough to explain a candidate to you, this is part of the problem.
Please take the time to listen to the full speeches and discourses of both candidates, whether you like them or not, use your brain and form your own opinion on whether you should vote for them or not. It's really that simple, don't let the media control your thoughts, instead form your own.
Only good comment in this section
But even if you really look at a fair assessment between the two you would choose Trump because he had more achievements despite his short and brutal experience than Kamala who can't even control the border.
I would, but my brain is fried past the point of being overcooked
that's why I'm here. I decided this year is too important to be voting blindly or not heavily informed on policy and your candidate
The debates are about to end her campaign.
I think she would have done better if the DNC held a primary race and she had won that contest.
For the DNC to just tell us that she is their candidate for 2024 was the wrong way to start a run for the PotUS.
@@chriso3130 💯
She is unburdened by what has been
The passage of time will unburden her.
hahahahahaha!!!
😂😂😂 brilliant
⚠️ Which is exactly what Mao and USSR said. Aka communism. Look it up. This woman is DANGEROUS.
😂
I'm not always in agreement with her, but I like that she gives off this competent civil servant vibe. I think that's her best asset
If that's what competence looks like to you, then you have the IQ of a Trump supporter.
Haha. Bro, you clearly havent seen hwr speak.
competent civil servant? she wanted to defund the police and allowed or atleast participated in the illegal entrance of millions of illegal migrants into america, does that scream competent civil service?
It would be nice to have someone who is sane and speaks coherent sentences as a president again
@@LordRykard9376 Ill bet you havent either.
“Do not come” gets me every time 💀
"I'm gonna come!"
@@greendaleforever inside 💀
Immmnaa come ☠️☠️
she said it their safety
Thank god she can get back to her regular gig of doing nothing for the next two months.
Can we get a podcast with her talking about policy for a couple hours?
this, please
She’s can’t answer questions, she can only ask questions.
The answers is NO!
“Let’s talk about the passage of time. The passage of time is significant, because of the passage of time.”
Repeat x50
Without a teleprompter please
What can be, unburdened by what has been. That's all you need to know.
THATS A VERY HOPEFUL SMART WAY TO THINK..
The American people need to be unburdened by her extreme self this November.
In all honesty, if one really thinks about that, it's by far the only intelligent thing she has said.
What has been has been Joe and Kamala
“Sir I’m asking a question”
I am the one who talks.
The fact that men don't have the ability to carry a child for nine months doesn't mean they can't have an option on whether or not a human being that has done nothing wrong should live
"And I'm making a point. Women are the only people who can give birth--hence laws which apply to pregnancy naturally first apply to women."
@@EzzyFramesit isn’t a human being yet nor does the opinion of a man get to dictate the choice of keeping it for them. All people are asking for is a choice on the matter.
@@EzzyFramesJust because women don't have penises doesn't mean they aren't entitled to their opinion that the government can forcibly circumcise every man to protect innocent others from cancer!
I have a friend who is a DA and while she does prosecute criminals, many under the age of 18, she also works hard to advocate for them to make sure they are brought to restorative justice. She was shot while working at her parents restaruant during a robbery, which motivated her to do this work. Talk about loving thy enemy. There are good people out there doing good work. They are far from perfect but who is? This piece reminded me of her.
😂😂😂😂
After watching this video I still don’t know her policies
Neither does she
Neither does she.
@@soyokazeėgreat retort
no tax on tips baby! she also gonna be tough on borders and attack inflation on day 1, drill baby drill! its gonna be great. TRUMP YOU'RE FIRED! ...wait a minute..
Nor does she!
I agree with most people on here, this was a fair assessment of vice president Harris. I also think that it is totally okay that her views on certain issues are not set in stone and she does consider what other people say or think, i'd rather have a politician who is open to ideas and isnt so closed off.
Any piece that ends with a wholly positive conclusion, like this does, isn't "fair." It is a finger on the scale.
The grayer areas, light criticisms at best, discussed earlier in the piece, are included only to give weight to that final messaging.
Yeah keep believing the narrative. lol. They call it a story for a reason.
What are her views? Did you read her mind or something?
Of course, any politician with a brain in their head is likely to change policy positions given the changes that are going on in the world. That’s not a flip-flop necessarily, most often it’s because situations just changes and options have changed. I don’t need somebody who said in stone when the ground is eroding beneath them. I need someone who sees a situation and addresses that situation for what it is at the moment and is capable of changing that assessment when the situation changes.
@@twittertwice Doing 180's and ALSO not following through to begin with... Say what? Harris is not that; she's what's known in politics as a paper bag.
as a prosecutor not going public record about issues that her office may litigate on down the road is not a bad thing
It's the ethical thing to do.
Ethics, huh? Washington hasn't seen that in a long time.
What???
@@kingace6186 There is nothing ethical about her or any other democrat
@@MrBeetsGamingyou cant be talking when the other guy wants to suspend the supreme law of the land….
@@MrBeetsGamingProject 2025
Thank you for posting the good and bad!
I kinda like that she doesn’t just jump into an opinion without thinking it through and reading the room first. A president needs to do that
No, you kinda *like her* or whatever agenda you feel she aligns with that you also align with. If someone you *disliked* did that it would instead be a point of attack.
LOL okay so when is she going to solve the border crisis??? We need someone to get on these issues and not just 'feel' them out. What qualities do you even want as a president if you consider kamala?
@@Subremedy Can string a sentence together.
@@Subremedythere isnt something like a border crisis, and inmigration, legal or ilegal, is not a issue, cry about it
Yes
I’ve always felt these things about Kamala but never knew how to really put it into proper words. But yes she has a deep conviction but yet has nothing to be convicting for. That’s why it surprised me with how many people are demanding to know what her policies are. She’s just gonna be a continuation of Biden with some minor changes. She’s not very inventive but give her a cause she can rationally get behind and she brings that prosecutor energy. That’s why the campaign has had such momentum right now. In her mind this is primarily “beat Donald Trump” and it’s proving successful for the time being.
I agree, and this why I really like Walz as her VP as he does have those qualities she lacks. Always gotta remember we're not just voting for the one person, we're also voting for the team of individuals around that person. She can be uninventive but if the team around her is progressive and she's willing to steer in that direction that's a net positive IMO
Imagine believing this. Everyone knows shes a failure.
Yep, and rest assured Trump getting Roe v Wade overturned gave Harris the traction to pull off a win.
She is very passionate about abortion rights.
lol who's everyone @@LordRykard9376
How about a few debates to see what she really thinks. Instead of the media painting a picture for her???
Oh God, I cannot wait for her to debate Trump. 😆
They are playing games with that.
Are you blind? Kamala Harris paints and preaches about HER OWN picture. She has more than proved she is capable of being the President of the United States. You sound jealous. Didn't anyone ever inform you that jealousy is petty and shallow? Because it is and you are
How about both? With prolonged eye roll.
Getting the opponent to agree is the issue.
She’s spend her prosecutorial career locking up black men and laughing about it when she’s asked if she smoked weed. She’s a phoney and would make very bad socialist policies.
“When they go low, make sure they hit the ground hard like a coconut falling off a tree” Harris-Walz 🥥💙
You definitely don’t seem weird and socially awkward
@@robertjlaw9485weird dont work the other way round bestie
@@jeongbun2386wasn’t it creepy Joe? and now it’s weird trump lol so original. I’m surprised no one’s calling her pig since hating/defunding cops is a thing for some democrats.
@@robertjlaw9485 Your comment says more about you than the person you're directing it at
@@robertjlaw9485 get better soon ❤🩹❤
Appreciate Vox news for showing Boths the good side and bad sides of Kamala. Many new sites only talk good about the person who they favor (cough cough Fox News & CNN) but never the bads.
@Jenell30 neutrality in media is never bad
Yeah like Vox isn’t any where like CNN at all lol
I’m not sure how they could give you a bad side of Kamala Harris, who is extremely well prepared to become president of the United. I likely think they told you what they didn’t like about her. It doesn’t mean it’s a bad side of her, it just means that whoever wrote it or who is every speaking about it disagrees with her..
cough cough the entire liberal media. get real.
As a foreigner I cannot grasp why people are elected for a spot like district attorney. It sounds wrong to me that people must campaign and run for that function (or even for judge). The executive and legislative branches are supposed to be accessible via elections, but judicial functions? District attorney, prosecutor? Madness
I agree with you. In Dutch we have a concept we've termed the "rechtstaat" which is considered to be a sort of fundamental state of being for our society possibly best compared with the phrase "a nation of laws" if it must be translated into English. Essentially it means the state is itself bound by law and legal rights and justice are not (supposed to be) subject to political whims and arbitrary despotism.
It's why our courts and judges are not politically appointed and even the public prosecutors are nominally independent from politics and government.
I could sort of understand the appeal of elected public prosecutors in the sense that the people might be deciding what they feel is important to pursue or if they want to show trust in the competence of the prosecutor.
But elected judges seems absurd, especially when they campaign on ideology and values. Generally the law should be their only measure. That being said, I live in one of the many countries that has a codified legal code, and the USA has a hybrid system heavily leaning towards common law which places defining what justice is almost completely with the judge.
I guess that's why people think California is weird. Californians have more say in things than in some other states. Can even put Propositions on the ballot with enough signatures.
I think it's great that people get tp choose who enforces the laws.
District Attorney / prosecutor are part of the executive branch
American politics feel like high school politics to me - the louder, the most visible, the richer ones have the best chances, not the most qualified ones.
Her questions to Brett Kavanaugh were ridiculous. She just repeated the same question over and over without ever clarifying the question.
all i can say is that things don’t feel nearly as hopeless with Biden stepping down and her running.
Hahaha dems are done.
@@LordRykard9376no, y’all are DONE. the whole country is done with y’all
@@LordRykard9376cope 😂😂😂😂
@@LordRykard9376 keep dreaming, you might want to wear some diaper don, cos' in November you gonna wet the bed so much 🤣🤣🤣
why? because you want a radical socialist, the most radical ticket VP and President in US history? and the least popular vice president who was chosen to be the next president by NOBODY. that is not hopeless, that is shameful and disgraceful
I have confidence in her but I hope she has learned from her mistakes. She must make it crystal clear what she stands for and be carefull in using language that everyone can understand.
I wish she'd talk about policies instead of platitudes. The language thing is simple to do. She obstinates her questions on purpose as a way to not answer policy questions.
How could you possibly have confidence in her? She is currently VP and failing miserably at it.
She has no platform or policies. Her whole campaign is don't vote Trump.
@@aaronjustice2566 I'm mainly hearing about Trump about him dissing Kamala about her racial background. I really don't think dissing people should be questioned for campaigns.
Yeah and let’s bring out megan the stallion to twerk on stage because that’s what we think about our black voters! News flash, She’s failing miserably at what she can “hopefully” do.
@@aaronjustice2566 This is what happens when the short bus pulls up to the voting center
No reference to what her metrics actually were to measure “smart on crime” California’s crime, homelessness, and enablement of disorderly and destabilizing conduct is outrageous and societally destructive. Her ambiguity on issues seems like an attempt to be absolved of accountability.
Not a fact! She has not been in California for the last decade as attorney general but as senator and VP. Obfuscating truth!
Check the interview she did in 2010 with Google. Idk her stats after being elected as AG, but they can be easily googled.
Have you lived in California?
Do you live in California? 🤨
That's called being a woman. Zero accountability, when upbringing goes wrong. :D
I do live in CA. She's part of the horrible problems Cali has and she will just spread those same problems to the rest of the country. Crime is worse but so much wrong is now not a "crime" so they cam throw all sorts of false "statistics" around. And then there are the straight up LIES, endless desemblance...
Tulsi Gabbard really crushed her policy politics in the 2020 election year debates ... True? ...😮
6:44 “who here would abolish their private health insurance in favour of a government-run plan?”. We have such a thing here in the UK. We don’t have to pay for healthcare. It’s free and we are so grateful for it
It still boggles my mind how so many Americans are against it!
@@TheStubertos why are they against it? I don’t understand why some people would rather pay for healthcare??
I mean we technically still do cause it comes out of our taxes but the key thing is that we get free ON DEMAND healthcare which has helped millions
Maybe UK is not the best example for it, since your system is not in a great shape in the recent years (as far as I know)... But there is a lots of great examples about it across Europe.
Same here in Canada. I'm from the UK, and I've lived in the US. I have family there. Our system -as with the NHS - is under serious strain. But that's because of deliberate underfunding and neglect by successive governments. Though I think it's been particularly pernicious over 14 years of Tory rule in the UK. Conservatives everywhere seek to starve and break any and all social programs. The benefits of a healthy, well educated society is not their priority. They are motivated strictly by self interest and prefer a system that subjugates most people for the benefit of the few, as long as they are part of the few. And the most important thing from their perspective is to consolidate their positions so as to ensure that remains the case.
A lot of the stuff about she's going to check out the temperature before she stakes out a position is stuff you could say about many politicians. Joe Biden, Barack Obama, many others.
so so proud of her always, her efforts were not unseen.
There’s nothing wrong with changing your mind. If policy makers changed their mind based on the body of evidence and public opinion more often, our country would be better for it. I hope our generation becomes the generation that finally does away with the narrative that changing your mind is “flip flopping”, and that flip flopping is bad thing. Flip flopping based on where the body evidence currently sits is a good thing. I wish every politician flip flopped more often. If they did, government policy wouldn’t be so far behind public opinion on basically every issue. Policy lags behind shifting public opinion and leads to issues where there is a large consensus being completely irrelevant to government policy on those issues for like two decades before policy actually changes to meet the consensus of experts and the consensus of the public.
“The George Floyd moment” wording was a choice
literally..
What a joke. 3 months ago she was being hidden because of her incompetence. Now we're supposed to believe she's this great person capable of running the United States of America?!? Nah. Democrats like me are waking up to the lies.
So glad I am not the only one who 👀 at hearing that.
sorry, what's the matter with that, with the GF moment?
because it was not only about GF but also the other victims of racism?
@jacopostatti3129 I see nothing wrong with what was said. Some people just want to be offended. It validates their victim card
"The significance of the passage of time is so significant because it shows that the time is significant." Brilliant!
A typical Harris word salad.
Its not about what she will do as President but what she has done as VP for 3.5 years which is NOTHING!
Very true, just a year ago they were talking about her not being on the ticket with Joe Biden during the election because of how unpopular she was but now she’s somehow the presidential nominee.
She can ask questions yet she can't answer . That's one of the main reasons why she failed
Which makes me wonder - how tf did she pass college classes?
i became a fan during the kavanaugh trials
Sure you did, bot.
@@LordRykard9376bros so bitter, step off politics videos mate
omg that's horrible do you think you'll ever turn back into a human?
another bot
Its suuuper easy to look tough on the attack, when asking questions. Whatever your policy position, as long as it aligns with yours it makes a politician look good. Its not as impressive as people make it out to be.
“Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine.”
Thats a correct simplified assessment
Russia decide to invade Ukraine when US lead NATO reaching Russian border!
@@jooo8673so is her assessment of the passage of time and its importance.
At least I can take comfort in the fact that my 6 year old will be able to understand her speeches.
@jooo8673 was she speaking to elementary students?
sometimes it takes explaining something in a simplified way for it to stick with people. we fear what we don't understand
BYE FELICIA!!!
She’s never been to the border and realize how much US CITIZENS were struggling for the millions coming across the border.
I guess that giggle after the marihuana legalisation question did mean: "Yes!" 😂
Right… her & Joe both made sure that plenty of people were locked up on possession charges.
*could’ve been legalized in 2020*
No, it means "I don't want to lose voters so let's laugh it off so nobody asks me again".
@@Valentina.MontanoGotta give it to her, she knows how to play the game 😂
Worst. Candidate. Ever.
Now look up "Tulsi Gabbard rips Kamala Harris"
Does it make you "feel" better to remember a glory moment. That was a learning moment for both of them but apparently only one of them learned and evolved. The other is irrelevant.
@@HoraceWest-1 what an odd way to look at it. Just ignore what was brought up because one of them has "evolved" 😂👍
@@devanman7920
Your answer should have been: (Yes, remembering that moment makes me "feel" better. I don't like Kamala and hate that things are looking positive for her. )
Also D, If I was ignoring anything, I would not be here! What I'm actually doing here is the opposite of ignoring.
Its a win, win though. You feel good regarding a debate in 2019. I feel good that the former prosecutor, senator, Attorney General, Vp may become Prez. You keep holding onto that debate like a coping blanket. Peace ✌
I did look it up. I also saw that Tulsi Gabbard's views on abortion, climate, gun control, have evolved. After quitting the Democratic party in 2022, she gave up her radical views and seems to be drifting into the Rump orbit.
@@devanman7920 So basically, look at my echo chamber example that has a title which makes it obvious who the video creator favours… and don’t search fair debate titled videos with her in it?
And people wonder why a large chunk of US citizens are easily manipulated, yet delusional that they aren’t? 😂🤦♂️
What i get from this is the significance of the passage of time.
Really downplayed her border failures as the border czar.
Wow, she hasn’t aged a bit since 2010
yes she has lol
neck wrinkles... makeup
She did, she went through menopause and is susceptible to emotional instability.
SHE'S TAKING CARE OF HER FACE NOT FOR THE PEOPLE
SHe is still 13 y....
She always raves about her career as a prosecutor or attorney in CA but as pro-Far Left , she believes in the rights of criminals so criminals can be released easily; crime goes up with no consequences for criminals and at the same time there are "no" police to defend citizens as she favors defunding police (funds rerouted elsewhere). She wanted open borders so she didn’t want to go to the border to see reality and not even respect the Texas patrols working so hard to control the area. She didn’t care about her fellow American workers.
Does Kamala ever tell her supporters that these illegally entering immigrants have priority in their housing, food, healthcare, etc.? US citizens are not a priority! These recent immigrants will be supported by our hard earned dollars (all kinds of taxes on us) but everything will be free for them.
Kamala paints a flowery image for us like we'll have a better life (housing, work/pay, Medicare, food, gasoline, etc.) after she becomes President but she is only fooling her supporters because they are not thinking sensibly or seriously and not questioning her. Their life or their parents life will not be better, just like it is now but worse when we actually see where we are taken.
Well said! TY.
😘☮️🙏🎸
She couldn’t interrupt Tulsi like she always did the men. The whole I’m speaking now didn’t work on another woman.
What are her accomplishments, policies and positions? ... ?
Why don’t you research yourself? Or are you passive republican?
Exactly! All I know is she pivots a lot when asked about her stance.
Go to her website.
@@JohnDoe-jh5yr People have. There is nothing.
She just has a few vague, trite ideas like lowering the prices at the grocery store and building more homes. Nothing about the job side of the economy, increasing wages, improving the job market, etc. Just vagueness after vagueness.
No Tulsi Gabbard moment?
Hawaii doesn't like toosi gab bard
@@Icuh8n911 who cares? the truth is self evident.
tulsi who? 😂😂😂 gabbard is the literal definition of "irrelevant"
@@pgabrieli It was a defining moment in her last run for President... remember that?
@@chuckrogers5077 She got put on a Terrorist Watchlist for criticizing Harris
Tulsi said enough for me. i started skipping school at 14. I was boy with a single mom. If the gov had locked her up for that I would have been much worse
I’m old enough to remember when the Left hated this woman like 5 minutes ago😂 now they’re all pretending like they like her
Basically she's just a chameleon
Please, we can't go back, we're not going back!!!
Ohhh… we’re going back to America First🇺🇸♥️
To prosperity? Got it.
Can't go back to what? What's wrong with making America great again? Don't you want to prosper? Weird. 🤷
@@WallNutBreaker524We want affordable everything like we had with President Trump. Trump 2024.
you mean go back to a country with SANITY and MORAL INTEGRITY? got ya....
Good luck to your elections, Americans. I hope y’all select the most fit and competent person.
Nobody here rooted for her or knew anything about her before this most recent 15 minutes of fame she’s enjoying.
Always a happy surprise to see a balanced take on issues. Every idea has a good and bad side. Hearing good journalism point out both of them gives me some hope for a healthy discourse in America.
We’re not going back !
Not going back to what? You mean:
Low interest rates
Low gas prices
Lower food costs
No major wars
Lower housing prices
Less crime
Secure border
Your the only one in this thread who gets it 😮
@@jacobharris2373lots of dem bots here TRUMP 24
@@TaiwanBobby most Dems are bots lol they are programmed with 0 critical thinking skills
Intact first and second amendments….
She may be great at asking questions! But she can’t answer any of them
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY 💯 RIGHT
Let us say she does, will that alone make her or anyone a great President?
@@jagsanthanamits easy to attack, ask probing questions. Give me somebody willing to say something controversial because they believe in it any day. A liar sticks their finger to the wind and says whatever they think the audience wants to hear.
I got a Harris Walsh ad before this video
Pretty sure everyone did
its Walz
Not on premium. Worth it.
I got a trump ad in the middle of it lol
i got a trump ad
Not a lot of promises just "we're not going back" ok but are we going ahead ? or just keeping status quo ? Cause America desperately needs a lot of change
What’s her policies??? Please anyone let me know I’ve been waiting for 3 months now
Safe to say she fell off of a coconut tree and that’s why she’s unburdened by what has been.
I look forward to the day that she unburdens the public with her word salad heavily sprinkled with cackling.
@@lemostjoyousrenegade Simpletons like you just couldn't understand Truism.
@@lemostjoyousrenegade Simpletons like you just couldn't understand Truism.
The way she grills people testifying in committee hearings makes it absolutely clear that she was a prosecutor, and a really, really good one at that. Those were cross examinations and she absolutely obliterated the defense’s whole narrative every time she grilled a witness. 😂
Learned nothing of value here
4:08 She tries to get an answer from Barr. Barr says he was not asked so she tries to get him to say he was asked informally followed by "you don't know"; basically putting words in his mouth that Barr did not say at all.
At 4:27 when Barr tries to explain his position she shuts him down.
While this might work in court when trying to win an argument this is not how a president / CEO should run things. She's grandstanding rather than trying to get answers.
"How panicked were you when you couldn't find toilet paper"?
pretty neutral explanation!
I was waiting for this one
she wont even do a single interview no worries the media will tell you about her instead.
Didn’t she sleep her way to that position?
No intelligence no consciousness in haris
I don't know haris ? Brainless, unconscious, sounds like the Living Dead.
Feelings over policy. A complete disaster for the Western world in she gets to be President.
Yea Rump is the ideal of a rational human being in control of his emotions, the Roman ideal of "mens sana in corpore sano". Yup. Uh-huh.
America dodged a bullet
She grew up in Canada and was upper middle class and NOT black at all.
We are NOT going back 💙👍🏻
Onward into more Marxism right?
Oh, on the contrary, you are! 😂
The funny part is the only thing I remember when she was DA in SF was the drug lab scandal.
No smartphones back then. I barely used the internet in my off time. I probably read the local paper more by paper than online.
unburdened of Kackles & the Diddycrats by the passage of time
"Let's bring metrics..."
This! Immediately voting her 😂
Great at asking tough questions, but she herself is not answering the american people how she is going to make life more affordable for americans, border crisis, negotiate peace in war zones. She says useless stuff and doesn't make any sense.
@@finesgomez4154She filibusts with so many nonsensical words to say nothing at all.
She has zero accomplishments in 30+ years of government employment.
@@finesgomez4154absolutely, which all of these things she has a big hand in causing. She’s not fit to run a coffee shop.
Was expecting one of the seven moments to be her talking about falling out of a coconut tree, very disappointed
2:55 And they saying she’s not black.😂 Love this hairdo. Makes me think of the “Different World” episodes.
Right, I thought the same 💯
What about all the other qualified democrats that didnt get a chance? There were no primaries like how ethical is the whole thing really
She says that she wants to learn all information before giving her opinion, but that just makes me feel like how really uninformed is she before giving a press conference? She’s not that intelligent people I live in California, California and what’s happened to our state is a shame. she only cares about numbers that look good, but in fact aren’t
I mean she even admitted that she cares about the numbers
@@johncrichter that’s what I’m saying she never took on cases that she new she couldn’t win or make a political statement with. Prosecutors are really horrible people and they never see the good in humanity .
It's genuinely frightening to me how a politician who had some of the worst approval ratings in history can be so quickly repackaged to the clueless masses with such speed and efficiency. Her years of hare-brained appearances magically disappeared. Telling voters that a candidate who can't and won't speak to the media is simply thoughtful.
I have watched her carefully stage managed career from the time she started dating Willie Brown and insinuating herself into the very wealthy elite of San Francisco. She stands for nothing but her own ambition. As a DA, AG, and Senator i can't think of one good thing she did for California, and when she was actually running for president instead of being installed, California voters rejected her soundly. She is the ultimate sign of the complete decay and ruin of American politics.
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Absolutely not President material. A woman of word salad.
Thank you for your opinion. I'm sure successful prosecutors win their cases with word salad, not by building a structure of facts using progressive logic.
@@konicsection two things can be true once you know.
@@konicsection you say that like we haven't word salad after word salad spew out lol. The proof is in the pudding! (To keep up the food theme here)