Adding this a few days later because I’ve seen a lot of the same stuff: 1 - Yes, My channel is primarily focused on Aeronautica, but I have shown this video to multiple people outside of the RoAv community and they’ve all agreed that Aeronautica is better than PTFS. 2 - No, I am not saying PTFS is trash, I am saying Aeronautica is just better. 3 - Yes, I have been made aware that the 767 model in PTFS is older, but at the same time, as an outsider how am I supposed to know this? Yes, I probably could have compared something like the F-16s, but PTFS’ F-16 is paid access, and I’m not gonna pay to for something I’m never gonna use. 4 - While Aeronautica lacks flaps and gear tilt, it’s makes up for that in both flight physics and model quality. Again, *I am not saying PTFS is bad, I am just saying Aeronautica is better. Plus this is my opinion. if you don’t like it, cope.*
one thing that is good about aeronautica is that you can fly at 32 thousand feet for 20-30 minutes or an hour and the devs put so much work into the scenery
thats not an aeronautica only problem, happens across all roblox games due to floating point error. The map is too small on PTFS for you to see that butr if it was bigger the same thing would happen
Though I believe that Aeronautica really is a much more superior ro-aviation game, I must thank PTFS for introducing me to ro-aviation, and other games such as Neo Warfare X, which led me to Aeronautica. That being said, Aeronautica absolutely dunks on PTFS in most ways.
PTFS was also one of the first RoAviation games I played, as well as Dynamic Flight Simulator and Scallbob22's Flight Simulator (SFS). They're quite old now, and it really shows when you compare them to modern flight simulators like Project Flight and, of course, Aeronautica, which is by far the best.
I would also like to add that Aeronautica has much more and better sounds than PTFS. PTFS only has GPWS and Engine sounds while Aeronautica has Airport, Nature, Waves, and Wind sounds. Adding on to the already long list of differences of quality between PTFS and Aeronautica
i get that comparing ptfs to aeronautica might seem fair at first, but you need to understand that PTFS was made in 2010, it would take a long time to revamp the game to be as realistic as possible, PTFS is a very old plane game, and it shouldn't be compared to modern-day games.
Yet Aeronautica has 150 - 300 players on simultaneously on average, while PTFS can sometimes reach 8k. Are people just so unaware or do they not like the grind?
Both, but also PTFS appeals to a much younger playerbase than Aeronautica. Obviously with that said there are way more kids/teens on Roblox than teens/young adults
@@ilikecrawfish21 mobile support already exists, but the game is not made for it. Most mobile devices will crash at big airports, and there is no way to avoid that without removing most details off the map.
in the physics you failed to mention that aeronautica has overspeed mechanism were you engins will explode and that their is a crash animation, if you hit the ground at the right speed, you can also do sully like water landing and they are somewhat realistic. but great video as allways, aeronautica is defenetly better for me.
Aeronautica: Better gameplay loop and has actual progression Better airport diversity Better vehicle diversity Better map More things to do in game PTFS: Better taxiing system (I cry) Better particles (landing gear touchdown smoke, wingtip vapor trails) Cockpits. Cabin seats. Personally I prefer Aeronautica, but it would be insane if PTFS' pros were adopted into Aeronautica. There would be no stopping aero from being the #1 roaviation game.
Aeronautica: The map is expanding every update, PTFS: its map are stagnant. I think in the next update, Aeronautica will expand with Singapore airport, also, Kyokkou can be expanded to include The Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Plus, its devs are also working on an exciting new continent, which is like a larger version of Norman Island, and it will include Dubai, too.
Honestly, I think it's a bit unfair comparing the two because they both are a very different style of game developed in very different manners. However, I think you made a very nice video and I agree with what you've said.
@@masonsmainlineroblox PTFS: Arcade like and blocky, has an semi realistic and unrealistic approach. No crash physics Aeronautica: More realistic approach and has crash physics (like overspeed for example,) less blocky you: *_i see no difference here_*
I believe that Areonautica takes the top spot because of its huge variety of planes and customisation and lack of p2w, however in PTFS you can get out of the plane and do ground crew and stuff. PTFS is better in that aspect, but the plane physics are garbage.
In PTFS, there is a lot of gamepasses, I think the developers prioritize profitability, while in Aeronautica, it prioritizes accessibility, so Aeronautica is like an open-source ROBLOX experience.
Aeronautica is maybe better, but PTFS stays for me the iconic Roblox flight simulator. I don’t really like realistic Roblox flight simulators. If I want realistic then I just play MFS2020
aeronautica isnt that realistic. there are literally flying cow cubes and tanks, you can do barrel rolls with any plane, etc. also compared to MFS and PTFS aeronautica has a progression system
Time to dunk on PTFS, I can’t believe I used to play this game. The models. Even the remodeled planes suck. I mean the fighters are decent but they are still blocky. Even the old Fokker 100 model looks better than most of the models in PTFS. Second of all, they privated their development game, for the reason, “muahahaha it’s a secret”. Does the secret take 4 months to develop? Speaking of updates, they are so inconsistent! Sometimes every month, and sometimes every year. Also the terrain. Like, the buildings are decent but they use too many decals and the islands are way too big for the little amount of airports they have. Like, have a big continent for overland long haul flights. And then the atc… due to this being a simple game, atc is full of 8 year olds who bought the gamepass going, “Hardjet 3844 cler fro takoff from runway” meanwhile they are in the middle of a flight. Then again that also does happen in aeronautica but it’s way more common in PTFS. Also for the amount of planes in the game, that many gamepass planes? You have a Walrus, SR-71, F-22, F-35, F-16, A380, and for the group vehicles, a Concorde (in my opinion very well modeled and animated) a P-38 (why group?) and a very badly modeled F-4. And like you said, physics go brrrr
I feel like your arguments are valid but you’re also being a little harsh on PTFS. PTFS is made by a smaller dev team who are simply trying to make a non-realistic arcade style simulator. Aeronáutica is a tycoon style game that’s more about the grind. Fun factor is huge in PTFS because you can fly with your friends and do whatever whereas in Aeronáutica it’s a lot different. Also each dev team uses different tools, different software, etc. I would play aeronáutica sólo just to fly, but if I want to play with people PTFS is the clear winner. I think a much more fair comparison would be two smaller games such as aeronáutica and something maybe like Flightline. PTFS’ community is much bigger and it’s more popular in due to the part that it’s older and much less grindy but something like flightline could turn out interesting!
The point was to compare both games, Yes PTFS is older but that doesn’t justify a crappy model or 1/4 of the vehicles being paid access. Aeronautica is an economy game, not a tycoon.
@@Aeronauticable Yeah, that’s true, but like I said I feel like a more fair comparison would be with something like flightline. PTFS does not try to be realistic while Aeronáutica is fully centered around that. They both succeed in what they want to achieve, but for realism Aeronáutica takes the cake. I think an aeronáutica/flightline comparison could be pretty good since they’re both centered around realism
@@Aeronauticable man i totally agree, i fucking spent 1000 robux in PTFS, specially the usless ATC tower, and now I feel like I want to kill my self because of spending those robux
The PTFS players will probably fume at this but who cares ? Atleast your giving honest opinion and showing the real potential of the game, Now keep up the good work 👍
This is a heavily unfair competition, and that is because the dev team of PTFS is 3 people maximum, they only have one builder which makes the aircraft and map all by himself. Not trying to rage, just proving a point.
You forgot to talk about scenery, Ptfs is just basic stuff. Rarely gets new airports While aeronautica, Has alot of shit. You can do stuff from landing in the arctic, To the kai tak heart attack, And since there are so many, You dont really feel bored of them. Also the landing physics are- Not bad...
Aeronatuica has a bigger map and you can travel far distances for much more cinematic views ptfs, map is short you can easily cross it in about a few minute in aeronatuica it takes hours to cross the whole map and fuel burns more
i used to play PTFS all the time because i though it was the superior simulator. then i discovered PF and Flightline and then aeronautica. i LOVE aeronautica because you don't have to use robux for anything, it's all grind! so you can't have that rich kid that'll flex there airplanes that they "grinded" hours for. and aeronautica having a trading system is amazing! the devs are coming up with even more content for the game and with the hundreds of aircraft's, i don't think anyone's gonna get bored of playing aero
So I played aeronautica briefly(I'm a PTFS player) and I still think I like PTFS more. However, I will admit that Aero seems more thought out. My biggest conclusion, though, is that PTFS is a flying game while Aeronautica is a plane game. In PTFS, you have options to have unlimited fuel, no winds at all, and play it like an arcade game. You also have access to (almost) every plane as soon as you join, letting you have more ways to play immediately. meanwhile Aeronautica has progression when you buy planes, along with licenses for them. I dunno. Ptfs is just more casual and I like it that way.
PTFS has superior physics IMO, but Aeronautica has the best grind and process, makes game more enjoyable. So I guess PTFS is like a game that is just flying and no grind.
Dude what? Aeronautica’s physics are so much better. In PTFS you can climb at a 45 degree angle and GAIN airspeed. The only reason you like PTFS’s physics is because they are more forgiving.
I mean, PTFS is made by 2 developers and try to stay consistent with the game, not a PTFS defender. Aeronautica is still better but the amount of devs developing and trying to stay consistent is pretty impressive. I mean, the devs try hard to constantly update the game. Over all Aeronautica is better, but PTFS is still impressive for 2 developers (counting CoderQwerty, 3 developers. Opinon is respected though.
@@Nicalobocinator it's not really that, because i've already played games where you have to be careful with finances and stuff, but I really dislike having to worry about simething in the game, and risk running out of money
@@BurgertonYT you can get loans ingame so running out of money isnt really an issue, plus just ask people to give you money i once got 100k wp for literally nothing lol
now don't get me wrong, i really like aeronautica but there are some stuff in this video i disagree with, like how aeronautica wins the cockpit quality even though most of the planes don't have a cockpit and every plane in ptfs has adleast something to fill the interior, idk man i made a poll on my channel and an overwhelming amount of people voted for ptfs
Aeronautica is much better for one main (and personal reason), it's grind, sure "oooOooOoo grind boring Ptfs has planes that I can already use" but... think about it... it's much more rewarding when you EARN the plane (IE grind hours to get it) then just get it free, also a quarter of the planes in Ptfs are game passes, aeronautica is 100% free
Play Aeronautica for ever-expanding map, because every year, an major update will occur, this is thanks to Aeronautica's team of over tens of developers.
first thing to keep in mind (specially for model detail): ptfs is full size, aeronautica has very small planes hence why you can run that many detailed models and that big of a map in a potato PC, also the physics in aeronautica are wack because of the small size of the planes, still loving aeronautico tho
The knobs are long because PTFS is downscaled. They made the world itself half the size so that double the stuff could fit. For example if you go to the oil rig the trusses are oversized.
We need more points, so I'll continue your list and video with a comment: 1. Destruction: In ptfs the planes have no destruction, however only destruction is water. In aeronautica you can get killed by overspeed, ramming something and water too, however PTFS did the water destruction better. + 0.5 points for PTFS for water +1 Point to Aeronautica for destruction overall. (Now its 0.5 of PTFS vs 6 of Aeronautica) 2. Aeronautica has liveries which are custom made, you can even make your own, for what it receives 1 point, and PTFS has only owner-made ones. +1 point for aeronautica for customization and liveries. 3. RP availability. In PTFS you can do RP with interior and passengers, while in aeronautica you can only RP interceptions (better than in PTFS), and in aeronautica there are weapons, unlike PTFS. +1 point per each. (Now its 1.5 of PTFS vs 8 of aeronautica) 4. Availability. In Aeronautica there's a license system, grinding system and stuff, however in PTFS you can start with any plane and fly. In Aeronautica, you can be an ATC Dispatcher for free, however in PTFS its somewhere 100 robux'ish. In Aeronautica, the ATC is really well doing, and ATC experience there is better than in PTFS. Aeronautica +2 PTFS +1 (Now its 2.5 of PTFS vs 10 of aeronautica)
aeronautica is the game you go for a realistic experience, which you can have in ptfs, but it lacks the physics, details, and variety of airports/planes. ptfs is for users who just wanna fly, without worrying about realism
Nautica had some "advanced stuffs" but ptfs is the classics so my opinions on games are positive and I'm not saying one is better, both games are made for one genre, aviation so yeah The only thing that makes Nautica stands out is it's not monetized, basically it encourages you to work hard Ptfs is a sandbox aviation game but that has a cost of monetization
@@Aeronauticable they have donations and merch so quite a few people donate for a good game like aero, no need to put 20 gamepasses for nearly every aircraft/feature
Alternative title : aeronautica youtuber dunks on PTFS for 7 minutes. I don't even disagree, I really prefer Aero, but sometimes it just feels like you (more or less intentionally) omit details that go in favor of PTFS. Like for example, almost all aircraft in PTFS have full interiors/cockpits. While cockpits are more detailed in Aeronautica, only a few dozens out of the 400+ planes have them.
While you are correct about the interiors, on PTFS aircraft, 90% of them are either extremely outdated, or straight up terrible. A bunch of seats in a row inside of a mesh isn't a cabin.
I would disagree, actually. While PTFS can be easily learned by the average user, Aeronautica is also very easy to learn. Quite frankly I think the only reason Aeronautica is not as popular is because it isnt as advertised.
@@Aeronauticable aeronautica actually has a few ads, just isnt as popular as a lot more youtubers do videos on PTFS, and a lot of younger people play it due to easy physics and no grind etc
@@Aeronauticable I think the main reason why aeronautica is less popular is the progression system, some people dont want to spend 839282 flying in ultralight to get cessna. I honestly like the progression system, but I understand people who despise it.
@@Aeronauticable But the average Roblox user only spends like 30 minutes to 1 hour on Roblox. If I were them, I wouldn't spend the time in between supper and homework just to take a 20 minute flight and then do it again and again.
@@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936 and alao flightline is a horrible game in general. the in-flight plane phsyics are an absoloute attrodity, i literally cant control the plsne every time i do a relatively mild turn the plane takes 3 sedonds to stabilise. also the autopilot is a convoluted mess, you need a map (that isnt in the game) with waypoints to set it up. i wouldnt reccomend this game on my worst enemy.
Although PTFS losses out on most things the ghost of Neo Warfare X still haunt me in aeronautica and dealing with randomly stopped aircraft when I don’t want to means a point to PTFS
@@Aeronauticable uh huh, sure, have you ever seen an aircraft launch in to the air at 100 knots while taxiing to a runway? no? well that’s not something you would see in ptfs either
i think we cannot compare ptfs and aeronautica cuz ptfs is a arcade game and it was created 13years ago and it was made to be simple and easy to play sandbox and aeronautica is a more complicated and realistic and grindy and it has totally different audience so i cannot be compared and i play both games so i personally think it is 50 50
This is my opinion, additionally PTFS has been updated through the years, so it’s still pretty fair to compare the two. I am not saying PTFS is bad, I’m saying Aeronautica is better.
First of you should put cockpit and plane models in 1 section second of in ptfs they are gamepass planes but atleast people can use every free plane right when they join also 81 aircraft isnt a small amount
First off, Nope. Cockpits and the exterior model are separate. and secondly, Sure you can use the free aircraft all at once, but my point was a quarter of the planes in the game are paid access and not unlockable at all. Plus, compared to the over 500 planes Aeronautica has at this point yeah... PTFS has a small number of aircraft. Especially as a F2P player.
PTFS has been continuously updated throughout its existence. All I am saying is that the average Aeronautica model is superior to the average PTFS model.
@@Aeronauticable you were right when you said the community is going to get defensive when you pointed out the flaws for pilot training sim, for a fact it doesn't train you for any piloting.
@@iLoveLegoPlane Every time when PTFS players loses a fight, they will say how less the devs are, how hard the modelings are blah blah, heard this millions times
Bro, No offense, but, give PTFS some points will ya? Its pretty much the OG Roblox flight simulator, and all these comments are from Aeronautica fans who probably transferred from MFS or some other High quality flight sim. PTFS is way different from Aeronautica, they have different approaches to making games and stuff, and you just go over Aeronauticas advantages. (No offense)
I would disagree, in fact, many Aeronautica players come *from* PTFS, as for giving it a point for being the most popular RFS, nah. Aeronautica is superior in my opinion.
@@Aeronauticable Thanks for responding, But like seriously, One is made for casuals and the other ones for Serious airplane lovers, and considering the fact your channel is just Aeronautica videos your comparison is just nonsense because both have their ups and downs.
@@AutumnDylanThey’re both casual games, one just has a progression system. Not only that, but just because his channel is focused on Aeronautica doesn’t mean he cannot give a fair comparison. He’s said multiple times in the comments that this was shown to people not in the Roblox aviation community and that they’ve agreed. PTFS isn’t bad, it’s just *not as good as Aeronautica*
@@thelettuceconsumer I can Agree with your statement sir, Aeronautica is slightly better than PTFS, But my problem is about why he made his arguement one-sided in the video. Before watching this video I thought the Aeronautica community was pretty chill and if they were to make comparisons they'd be quite chill, But the only thing that the video has showed me was "heres the most random stuff that make aeronautica better".
Regardless of whether Aeronica is better than PTFS, Aeronautica is underrated and PTFS is overrated. I think PTFS's simplicity is not enough reason for PTFS have that many players. (Yes, im Aero player, but I play PTFS too cuz PTFS make less headaches.)
I think the only problem with Aeronautica is the grinding. There's sometimds you can't just spend 4 hours or more to afford a good plane plus the licenses. In PTFS you play more casual and there are specialized RP servers Another important thing is that in PTFS there's only one airplane modeler while in Aeronautica they're more and updates i dont think they're weekly like ptfs. But i think Aeronautica is a good game, just isn't to funny to spend 5 hours grinding
I went from PTFS to aeronautica since PTFS doesn't have more and my fav planes and also many planes are for money and some are free. I was expecting like u farm and get money for planes than have to buy woth money and it free.
I get it that it’s your opinion but you came up with the categories that aeronautica would most likely win than ptfs so it’s kind of unfair in 1 way than another Edit: You’re also favoring aeronautica than Ptfs and just because your channel is primarily focused on aeronautica and just because it is that was doesn’t mean you have to say everything bad for other simulators. And I tried to “cope” but your 5-0 point scale made it so hard. No hate ig Edit 2: it’s hard to compare these 2 because the quality is almost the same in a few ways and you HAVE and I mean it to give credit to Ptfs because it really was the start of aviation in Roblox and you also have to cope with models and do this vid again now or later because this is outdated as heck. No hate ig for the 2nd time Suggestion: compare aeronautica to project flight if your that worried about quality than gameplay like dam and if you don’t do it then we all can say you favor this sim more than anything in the world
Don't get me wrong, I really like aeronautica, but.. PTFS is meant to be fun to play, aeronautica is leaning more to the realistic part, so I think this is not really fair considering you're just showing aeronautica's advantages.
I’d say PTFS is more so trying to be on the side of realism. I can deal with mediocre models. What I really don’t like about PTFS is how the physics are terrible, and the map is tiny.
the thing is you gotta take into account the scale of aeronautica and PTFS, PTFS has a 1:1 roblox scale while aeronautica has around a 1:20-1:60 scale, therefor the maps in aeronautica can be bigger without lagging out the entire game
and that reply tells us that this guy doesn’t care about Ptfs in my opinion Ptfs is still innocent and fine and just because the performance is good doesn’t mean the whole thing is set that aeronautica wins
I agree aeronautica is much more better no doubt, but i think you had some bias for aeronautica for example: -yes aeronauta's cockpits are better but you forgot to mention that a few aircraft has cockpits. -the biggest flaw of the physics in aeronautica is that the taxiing is quite buggy for quite a lot aircraft PTFS dont have this.
Adding this a few days later because I’ve seen a lot of the same stuff:
1 - Yes, My channel is primarily focused on Aeronautica, but I have shown this video to multiple people outside of the RoAv community and they’ve all agreed that Aeronautica is better than PTFS.
2 - No, I am not saying PTFS is trash, I am saying Aeronautica is just better.
3 - Yes, I have been made aware that the 767 model in PTFS is older, but at the same time, as an outsider how am I supposed to know this? Yes, I probably could have compared something like the F-16s, but PTFS’ F-16 is paid access, and I’m not gonna pay to for something I’m never gonna use.
4 - While Aeronautica lacks flaps and gear tilt, it’s makes up for that in both flight physics and model quality.
Again, *I am not saying PTFS is bad, I am just saying Aeronautica is better. Plus this is my opinion. if you don’t like it, cope.*
cope cope cope
@@theopenkingdomhow is any of that cope you goober? He’s just trying to stop repeat comments
Sounds like you’re just the coping one here.
@@thelettuceconsumer shut you don't know that meme?
Do you know that if you put square windows on airliners, they might crack and EXPLODE. It has happened before.
Yes.@@AviationHour1
one thing that is good about aeronautica is that you can fly at 32 thousand feet for 20-30 minutes or an hour and the devs put so much work into the scenery
Yup
@@Aeronauticablebut there is no gear tilt but ptfs has gear tilt
@@martyb866oh stfu ur just jeoulus that ptfs uses a model buildings instead of making one
It doesn't rlly matter since players mostly won't even know it even tilts
@@AstroYT69avgeeks would
I think the only bad points of aeronáutica are not having flaps, spoilers, reversers and so important, they dont have tilted landing gears.
All are good eye candy, but really aren’t too big of a deal.
Press Z for Reverses
Press X or Y for Flaps or Spoilers
Press N, M, O for Miscs
@@ciusszzz-music2203aero don’t have flaps
@@BigBass0111 cap. it have. but for some plane. I have ever use one. B-29 or What i forgot it have flap but no animation and no spoiler
@@ciusszzz-music2203 yes, SOME planes but not all planes
The only problem i had in aeronautica is the planes drifting when taxiing
thats not an aeronautica only problem, happens across all roblox games due to floating point error. The map is too small on PTFS for you to see that butr if it was bigger the same thing would happen
The farther you get from a spawn point, the more laggier and unstable movement is when on the ground. Its simple and expected by a lot of people
@@Morganou2019 yeah its an issue with driving games that have super massive maps
relatable
Though I believe that Aeronautica really is a much more superior ro-aviation game, I must thank PTFS for introducing me to ro-aviation, and other games such as Neo Warfare X, which led me to Aeronautica.
That being said, Aeronautica absolutely dunks on PTFS in most ways.
PTFS was also one of the first RoAviation games I played, as well as Dynamic Flight Simulator and Scallbob22's Flight Simulator (SFS). They're quite old now, and it really shows when you compare them to modern flight simulators like Project Flight and, of course, Aeronautica, which is by far the best.
it dunks on PTFS in EVERYTHING
@@nutaplexusOne of the first RoAviation games I also played is PTFS as well. That's how I got in to RoAviation.
who wins?
1. aeronautica
2. aeronautica
3. my favorite one, aeronautica
👍
Results defeated ptfs
Unstoppable aeronautica
W
in your opinion i guess
👎
I would also like to add that Aeronautica has much more and better sounds than PTFS. PTFS only has GPWS and Engine sounds while Aeronautica has Airport, Nature, Waves, and Wind sounds. Adding on to the already long list of differences of quality between PTFS and Aeronautica
hi spy @Spy_Agent5
and yes I agree
Now it has engine and GPWS sounds too
And bird sounds lol
i get that comparing ptfs to aeronautica might seem fair at first, but you need to understand that PTFS was made in 2010, it would take a long time to revamp the game to be as realistic as possible, PTFS is a very old plane game, and it shouldn't be compared to modern-day games.
Yet Aeronautica has 150 - 300 players on simultaneously on average, while PTFS can sometimes reach 8k. Are people just so unaware or do they not like the grind?
most likely a mix of both
Both, but also PTFS appeals to a much younger playerbase than Aeronautica. Obviously with that said there are way more kids/teens on Roblox than teens/young adults
@@mapper7310 im a kid and i still love aeronautica, ptfs did get me into ro-aviation but aeronautica is my go-to now
aeronautica needs mobile support, because of kids
@@ilikecrawfish21 mobile support already exists, but the game is not made for it. Most mobile devices will crash at big airports, and there is no way to avoid that without removing most details off the map.
Ptfs is more of a arcade and roleplay game, aero is more of a actual flight sim.
Well, imagine those people trying to act as such a "realistic atc conversation" in such an unrealistic game
@@IamnotShawn777 it’s funny to watch people have a arc convo in that game
i hate aerinotica just cuz u beed to spebd time on de game to get their money and buy plane like bro i just want to pilot the 747-200 in peace
@@Parkour-u7x skill issue, i spent 1 day to grind the 747-200 and i have 80 planes already
@@IamnotShawn777 ur skilled issue go touch grass i aint spending a day just to get a plane
in the physics you failed to mention that aeronautica has overspeed mechanism were you engins will explode and that their is a crash animation, if you hit the ground at the right speed, you can also do sully like water landing and they are somewhat realistic. but great video as allways, aeronautica is defenetly better for me.
Yes, that only makes Aeronautica an even better option
ikr@@Aeronauticable
And in PTFS you can literally go Mach 11 in a 747 and not die.
Aeronautica is simply superior
Usually with the doors in aeronautica you have to start the engine and then it will go smoothly
aeronautica is simply a superior flight simulator
I would agree, although both games are good for their respective communites.
Not really a flight sim more of a tycoon-ish ro aviation game
I've seen alot of toxicity in PTFS in the last year when I have played it@@Aeronauticable
stop the cap@@IL-96_Enjoyer
@@aaronkiefer-he1jl Gurl I'm a expert in aeronautica it is a tycoon based game
Aeronautica:
Better gameplay loop and has actual progression
Better airport diversity
Better vehicle diversity
Better map
More things to do in game
PTFS:
Better taxiing system (I cry)
Better particles (landing gear touchdown smoke, wingtip vapor trails)
Cockpits.
Cabin seats.
Personally I prefer Aeronautica, but it would be insane if PTFS' pros were adopted into Aeronautica. There would be no stopping aero from being the #1 roaviation game.
Aeronautica: The map is expanding every update, PTFS: its map are stagnant.
I think in the next update, Aeronautica will expand with Singapore airport, also, Kyokkou can be expanded to include The Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Plus, its devs are also working on an exciting new continent, which is like a larger version of Norman Island, and it will include Dubai, too.
The cabin in PTFS just shit, when did the 737 turns into 4 seats in a row instead of 6????
Honestly, I think it's a bit unfair comparing the two because they both are a very different style of game developed in very different manners. However, I think you made a very nice video and I agree with what you've said.
the are not a different style..
Fair enough!
@@masonsmainlineroblox PTFS: Arcade like and blocky, has an semi realistic and unrealistic approach. No crash physics
Aeronautica: More realistic approach and has crash physics (like overspeed for example,) less blocky
you: *_i see no difference here_*
@@syberkyne they are both plane style ganes
@@masonsmainlineroblox both plane simulation games with different styles
i completely agree.
i used to play ptfs everyday but when i found aeronautica i basically forgot about it.
Same aeronautica gives us something to do other than free flight in a small map
I believe that Areonautica takes the top spot because of its huge variety of planes and customisation and lack of p2w, however in PTFS you can get out of the plane and do ground crew and stuff. PTFS is better in that aspect, but the plane physics are garbage.
In PTFS, there is a lot of gamepasses, I think the developers prioritize profitability, while in Aeronautica, it prioritizes accessibility, so Aeronautica is like an open-source ROBLOX experience.
yeah
You can do ground crew stuff with the aeronautican
Aeronautica is maybe better, but PTFS stays for me the iconic Roblox flight simulator. I don’t really like realistic Roblox flight simulators. If I want realistic then I just play MFS2020
aeronautica isnt that realistic. there are literally flying cow cubes and tanks, you can do barrel rolls with any plane, etc. also compared to MFS and PTFS aeronautica has a progression system
Fair enough
I play msfs too
@@Morganou2019 Cow cubes are JOKE PLANES.
The Antonov A-40 Was real.
You can also do Barrel rolls in PTFS If you can go in advanced mode.
Cope
If you don't like realistic flight simulation, then just don't call it as a "simulator", go play some shitty physics games
aeronautica is underrated, its a very good game
Time to dunk on PTFS, I can’t believe I used to play this game. The models. Even the remodeled planes suck. I mean the fighters are decent but they are still blocky. Even the old Fokker 100 model looks better than most of the models in PTFS. Second of all, they privated their development game, for the reason, “muahahaha it’s a secret”. Does the secret take 4 months to develop? Speaking of updates, they are so inconsistent! Sometimes every month, and sometimes every year. Also the terrain. Like, the buildings are decent but they use too many decals and the islands are way too big for the little amount of airports they have. Like, have a big continent for overland long haul flights. And then the atc… due to this being a simple game, atc is full of 8 year olds who bought the gamepass going, “Hardjet 3844 cler fro takoff from runway” meanwhile they are in the middle of a flight. Then again that also does happen in aeronautica but it’s way more common in PTFS. Also for the amount of planes in the game, that many gamepass planes? You have a Walrus, SR-71, F-22, F-35, F-16, A380, and for the group vehicles, a Concorde (in my opinion very well modeled and animated) a P-38 (why group?) and a very badly modeled F-4. And like you said, physics go brrrr
Yup. Couldn't agree more.
@Aeronauticable I know this comparison is biased but I don’t care. I’m tired of seeing this game praised when it actually sucks
@@APerson-fj6yx Finally😭 some wise human has spoken the truth
Ragebait
I feel like your arguments are valid but you’re also being a little harsh on PTFS. PTFS is made by a smaller dev team who are simply trying to make a non-realistic arcade style simulator. Aeronáutica is a tycoon style game that’s more about the grind. Fun factor is huge in PTFS because you can fly with your friends and do whatever whereas in Aeronáutica it’s a lot different. Also each dev team uses different tools, different software, etc. I would play aeronáutica sólo just to fly, but if I want to play with people PTFS is the clear winner. I think a much more fair comparison would be two smaller games such as aeronáutica and something maybe like Flightline. PTFS’ community is much bigger and it’s more popular in due to the part that it’s older and much less grindy but something like flightline could turn out interesting!
The point was to compare both games, Yes PTFS is older but that doesn’t justify a crappy model or 1/4 of the vehicles being paid access.
Aeronautica is an economy game, not a tycoon.
@@Aeronauticable Yeah, that’s true, but like I said I feel like a more fair comparison would be with something like flightline. PTFS does not try to be realistic while Aeronáutica is fully centered around that. They both succeed in what they want to achieve, but for realism Aeronáutica takes the cake. I think an aeronáutica/flightline comparison could be pretty good since they’re both centered around realism
@@Aeronauticable man i totally agree, i fucking spent 1000 robux in PTFS, specially the usless ATC tower, and now I feel like I want to kill my self because of spending those robux
The PTFS players will probably fume at this but who cares ? Atleast your giving honest opinion and showing the real potential of the game, Now keep up the good work 👍
I prefer ptfs but it's honestly personal opinion
Appreciate it
1:55 Livery ID and Wing ID?
That 767 looked nothing like the 737
The only way I think ptfs is better is in physics, but just barely due to the tilted landing gear and flaps
nah, tilted gear is the model more so anything, and that doesnt make up for the shitty flight physics
@Aeronauticable you have a point there, you can do a 90 degree takeoff without A/B in a Cessna 172, yet somehow people still call it, “realistic”
@@Aeronauticable language kids are reading, keep things civil
@@Memezymemes69no one gives a shit
PTFS physics are making newton angry
This is a heavily unfair competition, and that is because the dev team of PTFS is 3 people maximum, they only have one builder which makes the aircraft and map all by himself. Not trying to rage, just proving a point.
One person should be able to make a good quality model
@@Aeronauticable Yes, but Aeronautica has a much larger team, able to make more aircraft faster.
POV: when PTFS loses a fight
oH mY gOd pTfS hAS oNLy 3 dEVs~~
@@IamnotShawn777 what will be better?A game with 500 devs,or a game with 10 devs of the same skill
Ptfs has also been out longer
You forgot to talk about scenery, Ptfs is just basic stuff. Rarely gets new airports
While aeronautica, Has alot of shit.
You can do stuff from landing in the arctic, To the kai tak heart attack, And since there are so many, You dont really feel bored of them.
Also the landing physics are- Not bad...
Aeronatuica has a bigger map and you can travel far distances for much more cinematic views ptfs, map is short you can easily cross it in about a few minute in aeronatuica it takes hours to cross the whole map and fuel burns more
Ok
i used to play PTFS all the time because i though it was the superior simulator. then i discovered PF and Flightline and then aeronautica. i LOVE aeronautica because you don't have to use robux for anything, it's all grind! so you can't have that rich kid that'll flex there airplanes that they "grinded" hours for. and aeronautica having a trading system is amazing! the devs are coming up with even more content for the game and with the hundreds of aircraft's, i don't think anyone's gonna get bored of playing aero
YO THAT'S A GOOD POINT!
barely any aeronautica planes even have cockpits, but all ptfs planes have cockpits
bait, bait used to be believable
there are a lot of planes in aero that have cockpits now
@@IamnotShawn777my 747 doesn’t have a cockpit sadly
So I played aeronautica briefly(I'm a PTFS player) and I still think I like PTFS more. However, I will admit that Aero seems more thought out. My biggest conclusion, though, is that PTFS is a flying game while Aeronautica is a plane game. In PTFS, you have options to have unlimited fuel, no winds at all, and play it like an arcade game. You also have access to (almost) every plane as soon as you join, letting you have more ways to play immediately. meanwhile Aeronautica has progression when you buy planes, along with licenses for them.
I dunno. Ptfs is just more casual and I like it that way.
I can respect your points, as for me, PTFS just isn’t as good as Aeronautica, but in no way Is a bad game
Even though I think Aeronautica is better than PTFS, the PTFS community seems more active and friendlier than the Aero one.
Depends on who you meet. If you come into Aeronautica begging for stuff, you wont get it.
There's some chill people in aero
There are chill people in aero but it’s just that you don’t see them everyday
PTFS has superior physics IMO, but Aeronautica has the best grind and process, makes game more enjoyable. So I guess PTFS is like a game that is just flying and no grind.
Dude what?
Aeronautica’s physics are so much better. In PTFS you can climb at a 45 degree angle and GAIN airspeed. The only reason you like PTFS’s physics is because they are more forgiving.
@@Aeronauticable Yeah, only way you can gain speed while going that angle is afterburners (and i don't think ptfs even has afterburners)
@@Aeronauticable U CAN 90 DEGREES CLIMB A GOD DAMN B-29 I CRIED WHEN I SAW THAT
Nice video, can you do an actual version of this? PTFS is getting much better now with remodels and new stuff
PTFS sucks ass. It's definitely overrated
Fr it’s trash
@@ude_kptfs has been out longer and they could always use blender or a 3d model studio. It’s not like they are being forced to use Roblox studio
I mean, PTFS is made by 2 developers and try to stay consistent with the game, not a PTFS defender. Aeronautica is still better but the amount of devs developing and trying to stay consistent is pretty impressive. I mean, the devs try hard to constantly update the game. Over all Aeronautica is better, but PTFS is still impressive for 2 developers (counting CoderQwerty, 3 developers.
Opinon is respected though.
fair enough of an argument
PTFS has tilted gear, tire smoke, and not so bad landing physics (plane doesnt bounce around), but i do prefer aeronautica
As a PTFS player. I would only play Aeronautica if the game didn't have fuel, grinding and repairing, as that stresses me out.
If a plane can take the job it can do the flight..
Sorry to say but if those stress you out you will never become a pilot
@@Nicalobocinator it's not really that, because i've already played games where you have to be careful with finances and stuff, but I really dislike having to worry about simething in the game, and risk running out of money
@@BurgertonYT you can get loans ingame so running out of money isnt really an issue, plus just ask people to give you money i once got 100k wp for literally nothing lol
@@Nicalobocinator I guess. Also, I think you need bigger and faster airplanes to be able to cross the whole map.
now don't get me wrong, i really like aeronautica but there are some stuff in this video i disagree with, like how aeronautica wins the cockpit quality even though most of the planes don't have a cockpit and every plane in ptfs has adleast something to fill the interior, idk man i made a poll on my channel and an overwhelming amount of people voted for ptfs
I wasn’t comparing cockpit numbers, I was comparing the QUALITY of the models.
He was comparing quality
Try comparing Project Flight and Aeronautica next video
maybe
@@Aeronauticable 👌
@@Aeronauticable i bought it and the atc is also a gamepass. 60 robux gamepass for atc
one downside to aeronautica, is that i cant fly inside my buddy's aircraft with him😔
POV: when you taxi in aeronautica: \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Aeronautica wins, no more commenting needed
personally, I only find PTFS cool when there’s an ATC or playing with friends. Since the map is so small, I have almost nothing to do.
Aeronautica is much better for one main (and personal reason), it's grind, sure "oooOooOoo grind boring Ptfs has planes that I can already use" but... think about it... it's much more rewarding when you EARN the plane (IE grind hours to get it) then just get it free, also a quarter of the planes in Ptfs are game passes, aeronautica is 100% free
Though he forgot to take into notice that ptfs devs are way less and they use studio not blender.
so?
I don’t care what software they use, if the model is shit, the model is shit
@@Aeronauticable Exactly, if you guys are just taking pity on PTFS devs, just tell them to use the fucking blender
aeronautica is overall better but nothing can beat doing a butter landing in ptfs
i gues
imo buttering in project flight is better
so you are flexing you butter landings uder that kind oof ultra shit physics?
Yall hear me out they dont play aeronautica cuz some ppl are lazy to do it cuz of the grinding but id say aeronautica solos.
The grinding part gives you a purpose to play the game idk why people are complaining about it. I agree
the one thing that i didnt like about aeronautica is the plane sizes. the cessna looks bigger than the 747.
Ptfs is not a bad as you say, sure I love aeronáutica but I still love ptfs. They recently remade the physics so now it’s way better.
You forgot that PTFS doesn't need a lot of useless training to play.
A lot is an overstatement.
and u forgot that PTFS has lot of low quality plane models
and u forgot that PTFS's gamepasses has a total cost of 2955 robux
I don’t think this is a fair comparison because ptfs is basically just a simple aviation game that is just for fun but aeronautics is a simulation
Aeronautica is far from simulation. It's just that PTFS has awful physics.
Play PTFS for more details.
Play Aeronautica for big map, more planes, kinda like a simulator.
Fair enough.
Play Aeronautica for ever-expanding map, because every year, an major update will occur, this is thanks to Aeronautica's team of over tens of developers.
@@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashups true
WTF????????? Aeronautica has more details did u even played it???????
Thanks for information
Aeoronitica is just the free version of Project flight and PTFS is just a more basic version of Aeoronitica
first thing to keep in mind (specially for model detail): ptfs is full size, aeronautica has very small planes hence why you can run that many detailed models and that big of a map in a potato PC, also the physics in aeronautica are wack because of the small size of the planes, still loving aeronautico tho
"aeronautica physics are wayyy better"
*conveniently ignores the fact that planes randomly fling into the air on takeoff around 20%* *of the time*
The knobs are long because PTFS is downscaled. They made the world itself half the size so that double the stuff could fit. For example if you go to the oil rig the trusses are oversized.
Knob size isn’t affected by scaling, it’s affected by how big the devs made them lmao
@@Aeronauticableis this kid 9
We need more points, so I'll continue your list and video with a comment:
1. Destruction:
In ptfs the planes have no destruction, however only destruction is water.
In aeronautica you can get killed by overspeed, ramming something and water too, however PTFS did the water destruction better.
+ 0.5 points for PTFS for water
+1 Point to Aeronautica for destruction overall.
(Now its 0.5 of PTFS vs 6 of Aeronautica)
2. Aeronautica has liveries which are custom made, you can even make your own, for what it receives 1 point, and PTFS has only owner-made ones.
+1 point for aeronautica for customization and liveries.
3. RP availability.
In PTFS you can do RP with interior and passengers, while in aeronautica you can only RP interceptions (better than in PTFS), and in aeronautica there are weapons, unlike PTFS.
+1 point per each.
(Now its 1.5 of PTFS vs 8 of aeronautica)
4. Availability.
In Aeronautica there's a license system, grinding system and stuff, however in PTFS you can start with any plane and fly.
In Aeronautica, you can be an ATC Dispatcher for free, however in PTFS its somewhere 100 robux'ish.
In Aeronautica, the ATC is really well doing, and ATC experience there is better than in PTFS.
Aeronautica +2
PTFS +1
(Now its 2.5 of PTFS vs 10 of aeronautica)
aeronautica is the game you go for a realistic experience, which you can have in ptfs, but it lacks the physics, details, and variety of airports/planes. ptfs is for users who just wanna fly, without worrying about realism
Aeronautica is not a flight sim. It’s very unrealistic, it just has some better mechanics when it comes to flying when compared to PTFS
Nautica had some "advanced stuffs" but ptfs is the classics so my opinions on games are positive and I'm not saying one is better, both games are made for one genre, aviation so yeah
The only thing that makes Nautica stands out is it's not monetized, basically it encourages you to work hard
Ptfs is a sandbox aviation game but that has a cost of monetization
"The devs need to make money" Aero has like 10x the content and absolutely zero in game purchases. Its just greed
I disagree, devs should be able to earn off of their work, but the penny pinching of PTFS is agitating
@@Aeronauticable they have donations and merch so quite a few people donate for a good game like aero, no need to put 20 gamepasses for nearly every aircraft/feature
Alternative title : aeronautica youtuber dunks on PTFS for 7 minutes.
I don't even disagree, I really prefer Aero, but sometimes it just feels like you (more or less intentionally) omit details that go in favor of PTFS. Like for example, almost all aircraft in PTFS have full interiors/cockpits. While cockpits are more detailed in Aeronautica, only a few dozens out of the 400+ planes have them.
While you are correct about the interiors, on PTFS aircraft, 90% of them are either extremely outdated, or straight up terrible. A bunch of seats in a row inside of a mesh isn't a cabin.
the things is, pts is like a 2 dev game
But it’s been out longer than
PTFS is for those who want a simple, fun, flight simulator. Aeronautica is for those who don’t have MSFS and want a sorta realistic flight sim.
Aeronautica isn't very realistic either, it's arcadey as well with slightly better everything.
BRO YOUR TH-cam IS ON AERONAUTICA! Come on man!
Yes, I primarily make Aeronautica content. But that doesn't forbid me from having my opinions on PTFS
me personally, i would have given cockpits to PTFS as a lot more aircraft have cockpits compared to aero.
I compared the quality, not the quantity.
My bro, Quality > numbers
i play aeronautica and ptfs and i love them equally as much
It’s a Roblox flight sim, what did you expect (some aircraft are getting a remodel)
But, you have to keep in mind that PTFS is for the average user, while Aeronautica is for av-geeks and aviation enthusiasts.
I would disagree, actually.
While PTFS can be easily learned by the average user, Aeronautica is also very easy to learn.
Quite frankly I think the only reason Aeronautica is not as popular is because it isnt as advertised.
@@Aeronauticable aeronautica actually has a few ads, just isnt as popular as a lot more youtubers do videos on PTFS, and a lot of younger people play it due to easy physics and no grind etc
@@Aeronauticable I think the main reason why aeronautica is less popular is the progression system, some people dont want to spend 839282 flying in ultralight to get cessna. I honestly like the progression system, but I understand people who despise it.
@@Aeronauticable But the average Roblox user only spends like 30 minutes to 1 hour on Roblox. If I were them, I wouldn't spend the time in between supper and homework just to take a 20 minute flight and then do it again and again.
@@Aeronauticable And their is the fact that only two people are currently working on the game, So the models might not be that realistic.
3:30 ATC is paid bcs there will be so much trolles and it will just ruin the game.
So then what do the people who aren't trolling do?
I moved from ptfs to Aero because aero has realistic cities , scenery, larger map etc.
U shall move to Project flight or Flightline i recommend trying them out
@@Eye606 Hopefully project flight once it becomes playable. Flightline doesn't have proper scenery.
Project flight is playable u shall try it@@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936
@@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936 and alao flightline is a horrible game in general. the in-flight plane phsyics are an absoloute attrodity, i literally cant control the plsne every time i do a relatively mild turn the plane takes 3 sedonds to stabilise. also the autopilot is a convoluted mess, you need a map (that isnt in the game) with waypoints to set it up. i wouldnt reccomend this game on my worst enemy.
the only thing I dont like about aeronautica that you need to go on trainings and make money to buy planes
That’s the entire point of the game lol
That’s what makes it fun
Although PTFS losses out on most things the ghost of Neo Warfare X still haunt me in aeronautica and dealing with randomly stopped aircraft when I don’t want to means a point to PTFS
No tf it doesn’t lmao, that’s your Wi-Fi
@@Aeronauticable uh huh, sure, have you ever seen an aircraft launch in to the air at 100 knots while taxiing to a runway? no? well that’s not something you would see in ptfs either
@@antlionworkerfan2007 are you talking about the aircraft being shown from different servers? thats normal silly billy
pov: this dude compared the only cockpit in aeronautica with of tons cockpits in PTFS
You are right, PTFS has more cockpits, but most of them are hot garbage.
ok ive returned. ptfs are remaking all cockpits for 3rd gen (as i call it) @@Aeronauticable
Both games are equally good.(I'm saying this for the sake of not having a internet war over PTFS and Aeronautica.
Bro made it sound like ptfs is Fly wings 2015 💀
Cause PTFS is not as good as Aeronautica
It is, probably worse
IMO i like PTFS because you get all the planes for free.
No you don’t.
You literally have to pay Robux for a quarter of them.
@@Aeronauticable ok maybe not all but im not trying to fight but IMO PTFS is better.
@@AmericanTrainRailfan Your very wrong, All the planes in aero are free. i would rather grind than waste money on a shit game
@@cvgspotting 1. ur late
2. maybe i had the wrong version.
3. whatever
@@AmericanTrainRailfan4: ur a dummy
Bro just chose all the weakness of PTFS and put it
Weaknesses?
Buddy I showed what PTFS actual is
i think we cannot compare ptfs and aeronautica cuz ptfs is a arcade game and it was created 13years ago and it was made to be simple and easy to play sandbox and aeronautica is a more complicated and realistic and grindy and it has totally different audience so i cannot be compared and i play both games so i personally think it is 50 50
This is my opinion, additionally PTFS has been updated through the years, so it’s still pretty fair to compare the two. I am not saying PTFS is bad, I’m saying Aeronautica is better.
First of you should put cockpit and plane models in 1 section second of in ptfs they are gamepass planes but atleast people can use every free plane right when they join also 81 aircraft isnt a small amount
First off, Nope. Cockpits and the exterior model are separate.
and secondly, Sure you can use the free aircraft all at once, but my point was a quarter of the planes in the game are paid access and not unlockable at all. Plus, compared to the over 500 planes Aeronautica has at this point yeah... PTFS has a small number of aircraft. Especially as a F2P player.
@@Aeronauticable you know ptfs is from 2010 and got a new version 2015 and ptfs has only like 3 devs
PTFS has been continuously updated throughout its existence. All I am saying is that the average Aeronautica model is superior to the average PTFS model.
@@Aeronauticable you were right when you said the community is going to get defensive when you pointed out the flaws for pilot training sim, for a fact it doesn't train you for any piloting.
@@iLoveLegoPlane Every time when PTFS players loses a fight, they will say how less the devs are, how hard the modelings are blah blah, heard this millions times
Nice content you earn a sub
Core reason why Aeronautica is better than PTFS: the latter is made for money, while the former, for fun.
yup
aeronautica is better in every way possible by you
Bro, No offense, but, give PTFS some points will ya? Its pretty much the OG Roblox flight simulator, and all these comments are from Aeronautica fans who probably transferred from MFS or some other High quality flight sim. PTFS is way different from Aeronautica, they have different approaches to making games and stuff, and you just go over Aeronauticas advantages. (No offense)
I would disagree, in fact, many Aeronautica players come *from* PTFS, as for giving it a point for being the most popular RFS, nah.
Aeronautica is superior in my opinion.
@@Aeronauticable Thanks for responding, But like seriously, One is made for casuals and the other ones for Serious airplane lovers, and considering the fact your channel is just Aeronautica videos your comparison is just nonsense because both have their ups and downs.
@@AutumnDylanW for you m8
@@AutumnDylanThey’re both casual games, one just has a progression system.
Not only that, but just because his channel is focused on Aeronautica doesn’t mean he cannot give a fair comparison.
He’s said multiple times in the comments that this was shown to people not in the Roblox aviation community and that they’ve agreed. PTFS isn’t bad, it’s just *not as good as Aeronautica*
@@thelettuceconsumer I can Agree with your statement sir, Aeronautica is slightly better than PTFS, But my problem is about why he made his arguement one-sided in the video.
Before watching this video I thought the Aeronautica community was pretty chill and if they were to make comparisons they'd be quite chill, But the only thing that the video has showed me was "heres the most random stuff that make aeronautica better".
ptfs is for fun and to just fly (even tought i would make at last the f-16 free) while aeronautica is for pros and real grinding
Regardless of whether Aeronica is better than PTFS, Aeronautica is underrated and PTFS is overrated. I think PTFS's simplicity is not enough reason for PTFS have that many players.
(Yes, im Aero player, but I play PTFS too cuz PTFS make less headaches.)
I think the only problem with Aeronautica is the grinding. There's sometimds you can't just spend 4 hours or more to afford a good plane plus the licenses.
In PTFS you play more casual and there are specialized RP servers
Another important thing is that in PTFS there's only one airplane modeler while in Aeronautica they're more and updates i dont think they're weekly like ptfs.
But i think Aeronautica is a good game, just isn't to funny to spend 5 hours grinding
If you just hate grinding, just go and sue War Thunder
I like the grinding part it gives me something to do. Anyway I watch yt while my flights are cruising
lets compare player counts
I went from PTFS to aeronautica since PTFS doesn't have more and my fav planes and also many planes are for money and some are free. I was expecting like u farm and get money for planes than have to buy woth money and it free.
theres also space in aeronautica which PTFS doesnt have.
I get it that it’s your opinion but you came up with the categories that aeronautica would most likely win than ptfs so it’s kind of unfair in 1 way than another
Edit: You’re also favoring aeronautica than Ptfs and just because your channel is primarily focused on aeronautica and just because it is that was doesn’t mean you have to say everything bad for other simulators. And I tried to “cope” but your 5-0 point scale made it so hard. No hate ig
Edit 2: it’s hard to compare these 2 because the quality is almost the same in a few ways and you HAVE and I mean it to give credit to Ptfs because it really was the start of aviation in Roblox and you also have to cope with models and do this vid again now or later because this is outdated as heck. No hate ig for the 2nd time
Suggestion: compare aeronautica to project flight if your that worried about quality than gameplay like dam and if you don’t do it then we all can say you favor this sim more than anything in the world
And I’m not a nerd for writing too long 😅
you really should take coping more seriously, no hate
how do you access the cockpit in aeronautica?
5
@@Aeronauticable ok thx!
Is anyone else gonna notice that his Yt channel name is Literally Aeronotica💀
Just because i focus on Aeronautica doesn't mean I can't make content calling PTFS what it is - Trash
Don't get me wrong, I really like aeronautica, but.. PTFS is meant to be fun to play, aeronautica is leaning more to the realistic part, so I think this is not really fair considering you're just showing aeronautica's advantages.
I’d say PTFS is more so trying to be on the side of realism. I can deal with mediocre models. What I really don’t like about PTFS is how the physics are terrible, and the map is tiny.
@@Aeronauticable I agree with that.
I would choose PTFS bc I’m on phone
the thing is you gotta take into account the scale of aeronautica and PTFS, PTFS has a 1:1 roblox scale while aeronautica has around a 1:20-1:60 scale, therefor the maps in aeronautica can be bigger without lagging out the entire game
Scale doesn’t matter if the content itself is better
and that reply tells us that this guy doesn’t care about Ptfs in my opinion Ptfs is still innocent and fine and just because the performance is good doesn’t mean the whole thing is set that aeronautica wins
I already know that Aeronautica would win cause PTFS is a bit worse than Aeronautica
I agree aeronautica is much more better no doubt, but i think you had some bias for aeronautica for example:
-yes aeronauta's cockpits are better but you forgot to mention that a few aircraft has cockpits.
-the biggest flaw of the physics in aeronautica is that the taxiing is quite buggy for quite a lot aircraft PTFS dont have this.
Again, I referred to the QUALITY of the cockpits, not the quantity.
As for physics, that’s sometimes roblox goofing up, and not the airport models
you deserve a mil subs
Don't hate me, but PTFS looks stuck in 2010. Can't handle my opinion? Cope.
More like in 2016-2018. Most of the plane models are straight out of 2019-2021. Fortunately, the devs are remodeling the planes and even some islands.
Yeah, at least the PTFS dev team are doing something, making the scenery less bleak and making the aircraft less outdated.